High Resolution LC-MS for Screening and Quantitative
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
High Resolution LC-MS for Screening and Quantitative Analysis of Antibiotics in Drinking Water Using an Orbitrap and Online Sample Preparation Jonathan Beck, Charles Yang, Dipankar Ghosh, Kristi Akervik; Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA Mass Spectrometry TABLE 2. List of antibiotics analyzed with their theoretical masses, LOQs and FIGURE 4. Spectral comparision of the MS2 spectrum of the antibiotic Overview Results reproducibility trimethoprim obtained at a concentration of 80 pg/mL. The library reference The Exactive™ Plus Orbitrap mass spectrometer was used in this experiment. The spectrum is the top spectrum, the lower spectrum is from the sample. The Purpose: To demonstrate online sample pre-concentration and extraction of water Exactive Plus was operated in alternating full scan and all ion fragmentation (AIF) Quantitation Compound Theoretical Mass (m/z) LOQ (pg/mL) % RSD at LOQ samples and analysis with high-resolution, accurate mass (HR/AM) detection, comparison was performed with ExactFinder software. mode with positive electrospray ionization. One scan of full scan MS data was Acquisition and quantitation was carried out using TraceFinder™ software. The Carbamazepine 332.14050 0.2 8.90 quantitation and confirmation. collected, and subsequently, all of the ions entering the MS were fragmented in the theoretical mass of each protonated antibiotic compound was used as the mass for Erythromycin 734.46852 40.0 14.30 Methods: Inject 1 mL water samples directly onto a trapping column. The trapped higher-energy C-trap dissociation (HCD) collision cell at a collision energy (CE) of quantitation in this analysis. Calibration lines were created for each compound, and fit Ketoprofen 255.10157 1.0 9.90 compounds are then backflushed onto an analytical HPLC column and detected using 30 eV with a 20% stepped CE, and analyzed in the Orbitrap mass analyzer. The with either a linear or quadratic curve. Each calibration level was run in triplicate. Due Norethindrone 299.20056 1.0 13.50 resolution for the full scan experiment was 70,000 and the resolution of the AIF a Thermo Scientific Orbitrap mass analyzer. to the large concentration range of the standards, some compounds exhibited non- Roxithromycin 837.53185 9.9 4.20 experiment was 35,000. The mass range 150-1000 amu was monitored in full scan, linear calibration lines, and were fitted with a quadratic fit. All calibrators used a 1/X Results: This poster describes a method to perform screening and quantitation of Sulfachloropyridazine 285.02075 1.0 7.30 and 80-1000 amu in the AIF experiments. weighting. An example calibration line for the compound sulfamerazine is show in antibiotics at ppt and sub-ppt levels in drinking water using online pre-concentration Sulfadimethoxine 311.08085 0.4 4.80 Figure 2. The chromatogram shown in Figure 2 corresponds to the second to lowest together with HR/AM confirmations of the compounds. Data Analysis Sulfamerazine 265.07537 0.6 4.90 level, 3 pg/mL. Data was collected and analyzed using Thermo Scientific TraceFinder 2.1 software. Sulfamethazine 279.09102 1.0 3.45 Spectral confirmation was carried out with Thermo Scientific ExactFinder, 2.0 software. Sulfamethizole 256.02089 1.0 6.30 Introduction Sulfamethoxazole 254.05939 1.0 6.60 Most current methodologies for the quantitation of antibiotics in drinking water revolve Sulfathiazole 271.03179 0.6 3.60 around analysis using triple stage quadrupole platforms with offline sample Trimethoprim 291.14517 1.6 13.10 preparation. While this is a proven technique for the analysis of many contaminants in drinking water, ground water and other environmental water samples, the offline FIGURE 2. TraceFinder screen shot for the quantitation of the antibiotic sample preparation steps are time-consuming and prone to operator error and sulfamerazine at 3 pg/mL FIGURE 3. Alternating full scan and AIF mass spectra for sulfathiazole. The top reproducibility problems. In addition, the need to transport large sample volumes from cell is the chromatogram; the middle cell is the full scan spectrum; and the the collection site to the laboratory, typically 1 L samples, is laborious. This poster bottom cell is the AIF mass spectrum. illustrates the ability to directly inject the water sample without any offline pre- C:\Users\...\10-3 4/27/2012 1:50:24 PM TABLE 1. HPLC gradients for the loading and analytical pumps in the method RT: 4.81 - 5.10 concentration steps, while achieving the same sensitivities required for the experiment. 4.93 NL: 100 4.94 6.39E5 4.92 90 m/z= 271.03043- Thus smaller sampling volumes can be used. Time Loading Pump Flow Rate Time Analytical Pump Analytical Pump Flow Rate 80 4.95 4.91 271.03315 70 MS 10-3 4.95 4.91 (min) %A (µL/min) (min) %A %B (µL/min) 60 4.96 The method described here utilizes liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) 50 4.97 40 4.98 4.90 4.99 30 0.0 100 1000 0.0 98 2 350 Abundance Relative 4.99 with a Thermo Scientific Exactive Plus Orbitrap™ mass spectrometer using HR/AM. 20 5.00 4.89 5.01 5.02 10 5.02 1.3 100 1000 1.5 98 2 350 4.88 5.03 5.04 5.05 While the triple stage quadrupole instrument is routinely used in these types of 0 4.81 4.82 4.83 4.84 4.85 4.86 4.87 4.88 4.89 4.90 4.91 4.92 4.93 4.94 4.95 4.96 4.97 4.98 4.99 5.00 5.01 5.02 5.03 5.04 5.05 5.06 5.07 5.08 5.09 5.10 experiments, we demonstrate the ability to use a benchtop HR/AM instrument to 1.5 100 100 3.0 70 30 350 Time (min) 10-3 #1195 RT: 4.92 AV: 1 NL: 1.56E7 T: FTMS + p ESI Full ms [150.00-1000.00] 12.0 100 100 8.0 2 98 350 388.25366 quantitate and confirm the contaminants of interest. The advantages of HR/AM 100 instruments includes high resolution to isolate contaminants of interest from interfering 12.1 100 1000 9.0 2 98 350 80 15.0 100 1000 9.1 98 2 350 60 matrix peaks at similar masses as well as the ability to re-interrogate data at a later 160.13310 40 268.17517 15.0 98 2 350 Abundance Relative 391.28372 date for additional compounds. Furthermore, compared to the triple stage quadrupole 20 432.26056 Conclusion 200.12799 239.14865 164.98442 186.12950 291.14484 402.23300 212.09155 344.22751 371.22720 0 instrument, method development time is greatly reduced as there is no need to 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 m/z This poster demonstrates: individually optimize each analyte of interest. 10-3 #1194 RT: 4.92 AV: 1 NL: 6.37E6 T: FTMS + p ESI Full ms2 [email protected] [80.00-1000.00] 89.06022 100 . Online pre-concentration and extraction for 1mL injections of antibiotics at the ppt 80 level. 60 Methods 95.08595 133.08582 149.02315 40 105.07017 115.05643 Relative Abundance Relative . The quantitation of HR/AM data using TraceFinder software from the Exactive 20 159.08209 Sample Preparation 177.11186 0 Plus Orbitrap instrument. 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 420 440 460 480 500 m/z Samples were prepared from a stock solution of pesticides in methanol. Calibration 2 FIGURE 1. EQuan MAX system flow schematic . Spectral confirmation of MS spectrum collected in the same data file as the solutions were prepared from the stock solutions, resulting in 8 levels of antibiotics for quantitation data using ExactFinder software. positive analysis. Dilutions were made in laboratory water (HPLC-grade) to create eight Spectral Confirmation different calibration levels. The antibiotic calibration samples were acidified with formic . Ability to quantitate and confirm samples in the same analytical run for antibiotics To add additional confirmation to the antibiotics detected in the samples, spectral acid to a concentration of 0.1% formic acid. The concentration range varied for each in water samples. confirmation of the MS2 spectrum collected in the HCD cell was performed using compound, but were in the approximate range of 1 ppt to 10 ppb. This ensured ExactFinder™ software. Samples were submitted to the software after acquisition. The compatibility with the mobile phase for chromatography. No further sample preparation Limits of Quantitation MS2 spectra were searched against the built-in Environmental and Food Safety and Acknowledgements was conducted. The antibiotics studied for this poster were: carbamazepine, The limit of quantitation (LOQ) was determined by the lowest calibration standard Clinical Research spectral libraries. These libraries contain MS2 spectra collected on erythromycin, ketoprofen, norethindrone, roxithromycin, sulfachloropyridazine, We would like to thank Paul Yang from the Ontario Ministry for the Environment for group with a %RSD of less than 15%. The LOQ for this experiment is shown in Orbitrap instruments. Because all Orbitrap platform mass spectrometers are sulfadimethoxine, sulfamerazine, sulfamethazine, sulfamethizole, sulfamethoxazole, supplying the antibiotic standards for this analysis. Table 2. The %RSD for each compound at its LOQ is included in Table 2. In some compatible, they provide identical spectra. sulfathiazole, trimethoprim and tylosin. cases, the LOQ was lower than the concentration of the lowest calibration standard. The spectral match for the antibiotic trimethoprim is shown in Figure 4. This Liquid Chromatography Alternating Full Scan + All Ion Fragmentation Scans comparison is from the HCD MS2 spectrum of the calibration standard corresponding Liquid chromatography was performed using the Thermo Scientific EQuan MAX The Exactive Plus Orbitrap MS was operated in alternating full scan and AIF mode.