Preprint: http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.7633 Original Publication:

UPCOMING STANDARDS IN WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORKS

Sourangsu Banerji Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, RCC-Institute of Information Technology, India Email: [email protected]

ABSTRACT: Network technologies are However out of every one of these standards, traditionally centered on wireline solutions. WLAN and recent developments in WLAN Wireless broadband technologies nowadays technology will be our main subject of study in this particular paper. The IEEE 802.11 is the most provide unlimited broadband usage to users widely deployed WLAN technology as of today. that have been previously offered simply to Another renowned counterpart is the HiperLAN wireline users. In this paper, we discuss some of standard by ETSI. These two technologies are the upcoming standards of one of the emerging united underneath the Wireless Fidelity (Wi-fi) wireless broadband technology i.e. IEEE alliance. In literature though, IEEE802.11 and Wi- 802.11. The newest and the emerging standards fi is used interchangeably and we will also continue with the same convention in this fix technology issues or add functionality that particular paper. A regular WLAN network is will be expected to overcome many of the associated with an Access Point (AP) in the current standing problems with IEEE 802.11. middle/centre and numerous stations (STAs) are connected to this central Access Point (AP).Now, Keywords: Wireless Communications, IEEE there are just two modes in which communication 802.11, WLAN, Wi-fi. normally takes place.

1. Introduction Within the centralized mode of communication, The wireless broadband technologies were communication to/from a STA is actually carried developed with the objective of providing services across by the APs. There's also a decentralized just like those supplied by, on the wireline mode in which communication between two STAs networks. Cellular networks now provide support can happen directly without the requirement for top bandwidth data transfer for numerous associated with an AP in an ad hoc fashion. mobile users simultaneously. In view of this, WLAN networks provide coverage up to a place of additionally, they provide mobility support for 50-100 meters. Initially, Wi-fi provided an voice communication. Wireless data networks may aggregate throughput of 11Mbps, but recent be separated into several types depending with developments have increased the throughput to their area of coverage. They are: around 54 Mbps. Because of its high market penetration, several amendments on the basic IEEE WLAN: Wireless Local Area network, in area that 802 standard are developed or are now under has a cell radius up to hundred meters, mainly in development. office and home environments. WMAN: Wireless Metropolitan Area Network; In this paper, we address the technical context generally cover wider areas as huge as entire cities. of its latest amendments. In section 2, we briefly WWAN: Wireless Wide Area Network that has a discuss the history behind the development of the cell radius about 50 km, cover areas bigger a city. standard. Section 3 deals with the features of the IEEE 802 family which have already been implemented. In section 4, the upcoming standards

Preprint: http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.7633 Original Publication: are discussed and some open issues with the IEEE 3. IEEE 802.11 family 802.11 standard is given in section 5. Lastly we The absolute and the most widely deployed conclude our paper in section 6. 802.11 standard have plenty of extension and additional amendments are now under 2. Development of IEEE 802.11 development. First introduced in 1999, the IEEE The Physical layer (PHY) and medium access 802.11 standards were primarily developed bearing control (MAC) layer were mainly targeted by the in minds our home and work environment for IEEE 802 project. When the thinking behind wireless local area connectivity. The initial wireless local area network (WLAN) was first standards gave a maximum data rate of 2Mbps per conceived, it was just thought of another PHY of AP which risen up to 11 Mbps per AP with the one of many available standards. The earliest deployment of IEEE 802.11b [2].Newer extensions candidate which was considered for it was IEEE's like IEEE 802.11g and IEEE 802.11a provided most prominent standard 802.3. maximum data rate of 54Mbps per AP using various methods to improve up the utmost data However later findings indicated that the radio rates [3-5]. WLAN devices based on IEEE 802.11g medium behaved quite diverse from the common currently offer data rate 100-125Mbps [4]. well behaved wire. Concerning was attenuation even over short distances, as well as collisions Similarly, a comparatively newer IEEE 802.11n which could not be detected. Hence, 802.3's carrier provides maximum data rate around 540Mbps sense multiple access with collision detection [25].Furthermore, various other standards were (CSMA/CD) could not be applied. deployed which solved many QoS and security issues related with the newer standards. Additional Another candidate standard considered was mechanisms were introduced to treat QoS support 802.4. At that time, its coordinated medium access and security problems in IEEE 802.11e [12] and i.e. the token bus concept was considered IEEE 802.11i.The IEEE 802.11n standard which preferable over 802.3's contention-based scheme. we earlier discussed also introduced MAC Hence, WLAN began as 802.4L. Later in 1990 it enhancements to overcome MAC layer limitations became obvious that token handling in radio in today's standards [28]. The IEEE 802.11s networks was rather difficult. The standardization standard added mesh topology support to the IEEE body realized they will need a wireless 802.11 [34]. The IEEE 802.11u improved communication standard that could have a very internetworking with external non-802.11 unique MAC. Finally, on March 21, 1991, the networks. The IEEE 802.11w was an additional project 802.11 was approved (fig. 1). onto 802.11i covering management frame security.

The IEEE 802.11ad standard adds a "fast session transfer" feature, enabling the wireless devices to seamlessly make transition involving the legacy 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands and the 60 GHz frequency band [41]. The IEEE 802.11ac standard, under development is expected to supply a multi- station WLAN throughput of at the very least 1 Gbps and just one link throughput of at the very least 500 Mbps [45].

4. Upcoming Standards

4.1. IEEE 802.11ad The IEEE 802.11ad also referred to as WiGig is Figure 1 WLAN Network Architecture really a relatively new standard published in December 2012. It specification adds a "fast

Preprint: http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.7633 Original Publication: session transfer" feature, enabling the wireless information on which frequency, at what time and devices to seamlessly make transition in the under what conditions networks may operate. legacy 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands and the 60 GHz frequency band [41]. To provide for optimal 4.5. IEEE 802.11ah performance and range criteria, the IEEE 802.11ad The IEEE 802.11ah is directed at developing an provides the capability to move in between the international WLAN network which will allow bands ensuring that computing devices are usually user to gain access to sub carrier frequencies below "best connected," 1GHz in the ISM band. It will even enable devices on the basis of the IEEE 802.11 standards to access Through the vast improvements in spectral short burst data transmissions like meter data. reuse at 60 GHz and an efficient beam forming Additionally it can provide improve coverage technology, IEEE 802.11ad enables great range that will allow new applications such as, for improvements in capacity [42]. Many users in a example wide area based sensor networks, sensor thick deployment can all maintain top-speed backhaul systems and potential Wi-Fi off-loading performance, without interfering with one another functions to emerge [48]. This standard is under or having to generally share bandwidth just like the development and is predicted to be finalized by legacy frequency bands [43-44]. The likely 2016. enhancements to 802.11 beyond a brand new 60 GHz PHY include MAC modifications for 4.6. IEEE 802.11ai directional antennas, personal basic service set, The IEEE 802.11ai is a forthcoming standard beamforming, fast session transfer between PHYs predicted to be finalized by 2015. It'll add a fast and spatial reuse. initial link setup (FILS) that might enable an STA to reach a protected link setup that will be 4.2. IEEE 802.11ae significantly less than 100 ms [49]. An effective The IEEE 802.11ae introduces a mechanism for link setup process will then permit the STA to send prioritization of management frames. A protocol to IP traffic with a valid IP address through the AP. communicate management frame prioritization policy is specified in this standard. 4.7. IEEE 802.11mc The IEEE 802.11mc resembles the IEEE 4.3. IEEE 802.11ac 802.11m and is also scheduled to appoint an Among the important standards currently under operating group with the job of maintenance of the development is IEEE 802.11ac. This standard is standard around 2015. anticipated to be published by the end of 2014. It's expected to supply a multi-station WLAN throughput of at the least 1 Gbps and an individual 4.8. IEEE 802.11aj link throughput of at the least 500 Mbps [45]. That The IEEE 802.11aj provide modifications to is accomplished by extending the air interface the IEEE 802.11ad Physical (PHY) layer and the concepts which are embraced by 802.11n like (MAC) layer for wider RF bandwidth (up to 160 MHz), more operation in the Chinese Milli-Meter Wave MIMO spatial streams (up to 8), multi-user (CMMW) frequency bands like the 59-64 GHz MIMO, and high-density modulation [45-47]. frequency band. The amendment can also be meant to maintain backward compatibility with 802.11ad when it operates in the 59-64 GHz frequency band. 4.4. IEEE 802.11af The amendment shall also define modifications to The IEEE 802.11af is meant to operate in the the PHY and MAC layers allowing the operation in TV White Spaces, that will be the spectrum the Chinese 45 GHz frequency band. This standard already allocated to the TV broadcasters however, is scheduled to be finalized by the end of 2016. not used at a certain location and time frame [12].

It uses cognitive radio technology to spot white spaces it could use. However, this cognitive 4.9. IEEE 802.11aq technology will soon be predicated on an official The WLAN is fast evolving and is no more one geolocation database. This database can provide where stations are merely looking for just usage of internet service. This creates opportunities to

Preprint: http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.7633 Original Publication: supply new services, because the IEEE 802.11 5.3. MAC Layer Throughput standard must be enhanced to advertise and Even although IEEE 802.11g supplies a data describe these new services. rate of 54 Mbps, the MAC layer throughput is definitely not at this value. Detailed studies show The IEEE 802.11aq can provide mechanisms that with higher data rates, the MAC layer that will assist in pre-association discovery of throughput decreases to 40-50% of the new data services by addressing the methods to advertise rate. Several factors could be held responsible for their existence and enable delivery of information this reduction in throughput including the link that describes them. These records about services condition overhead of the MAC layer control will be made available ahead of association by headers and usage of the RTS/CTS mechanism. stations operating on IEEE 802.11 wireless Increasing the PHY layer data rate alone cannot networks. This standard is scheduled to be solve the throughput problem; nevertheless the published by 2015. MAC layer must also be changed. Two extensions IEEE 802.11e and IEEE 802.11n both introduce 5. Issues with IEEE 802.11 new mechanisms to resolve the situation, but these Several extensions of the initial IEEE 802.11 techniques are definitely not providing an entire standard have been developed but nonetheless solution. there are lots of problems connected with the standards which are needed to be addressed. 6. Conclusion In this paper we provided a detailed discussion 5.1. Security on all of the reported upcoming IEEE 802.11 Among the prime concerns in wireless standards. Although some of the key issues have networking is security. As WLANs operate within already been revised in the upcoming standards, a the shared medium, eavesdropping by lot of open issues still need to be addressed. The unauthorized people and important information Task groups for the standards have already been might be accessed with the utilization of malicious technologies. The original standard WEP had set up and some of them have also succeeded in security flaws which lead the wi-fi forum to implementing the tasks it was assigned. Still, the implement another encryption system WPA. IEEE 802.11 standard needs much development to Although WPA is a lot safer and provides good give strong competition to its wireline counterpart protection still it's not secure enough to be content i.e. IEEE 802.3 . with. More complicated encryption algorithms have to be implemented without decreasing the MAC layer throughput. References 1. IEEE 802.11-1999, IEEE Standard for Local 5.2. Data Rate and Metropolitan Area Networks Specific Another serious drawback of IEEE 802.11 Requirements – Part 11: Wireless LAN wireless network is the data rate, which is quite Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical low when compared with its wireline IEEE 802.3 Layer (PHY) Specifications, June 12, 1999. counterpart. IEEE 802.11g supplies a data rate of 2. IEEE 802.11b-1999, IEEE Standard for Local 54Mbps. There is significant improvement in the and Metropolitan Area Networks Specific information rates supplied by the IEEE 802.11n Requirements – Part 11: Wireless LAN extension. The WWise and TGnSync proposal Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical supported data rates upto 540Mbps and 630Mbps Layer (PHY) Specifications High Speed respectively. However, the 40 MHz channel Physical Layer Extension in the 2.4 GHz Band, required to guide such data rates aren't for sale in September 16, 1999 many countries. The more recent IEEE 802.11ac 3. IEEE 802.11a-1999, IEEE Standard for Local aims at providing data rates upto 1Gbps. But this and Metropolitan Area Networks Specific data rate is even still quite low as set alongside the Requirements – Part 11: Wireless LAN 10 GHz data rate of the wireline network standard Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical 802.3n.

Preprint: http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.7633 Original Publication:

Layer (PHY) Specifications High Speed International Workshop on QoS and Security Physical Layer in the 5 GHz Band, 1999. for Wireless and Mobile Networks 2005 4. IEEE 802.11g-2003, IEEE Standard for Local (Q2SWinet ’05) Spring, Canada, 2005, pp. and Metropolitan Area Networks Specific 122–129. Requirements – Part 11: Wireless LAN 13. A.C.H. Ng, D. Malone, D.J. Leith, Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Experimental evaluation of TCP performance Layer (PHY) Specifications Amendment 4: and fairness in an 802.11e testbed, in: ACM Further Higher Data Rate Extension in the 2.4 Annual Conference of the Special Interest GHz Band, June 27, 2003. Group on Data Communication 2005 5. U.S. Robotics, 802.11g Speed Acceleration (SIGCOMM ’05) Philadelphia, PA, USA, How We Do It, 2005, pp. 17–22. www.usr.com/download/whitepapers/125mbps 14. S. Choi, J. del Prado, S. Shankar, S. Mangold, -wp.pdf 2004. IEEE 802.11e contention-based channel access 6. A. Otyakmaz, U. Fornefeld, J. Mirkovic, D.C. (EDCF) performance evaluation, in: IEEE Schultz, E.Weiss, Performance evaluation for International Conference on Communications IEEE 802.11g hot spot coverage using (ICC ’03) Anchorage, Alaska, USA, 2003. sectorized antennas, in: 15th IEEE 15. Kuran, Mehmet S., and Tuna Tugcu. "A International Symposium on Personal, Indoor survey on emerging broadband wireless access and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC technologies." Computer Networks 51.11 ’04), vol. 2, 2004, pp. 1460– 1465. (2007): 3013-3046. 7. D. Vassis, G. Kormentzas, A. Rouskas, I. 16. Hiertz, G., et al. "The IEEE 802.11 Maglogiannis, The IEEE 802.11g standard for universe." Communications Magazine, high data rate WLANs, IEEE Network 19 (3) IEEE48.1 (2010): 62-70. (2005) 21–26. 17. Akyildiz, Ian F., and Xudong Wang. "A survey 8. IEEE 802.11d-2001, IEEE Standard for Local on wireless mesh networks."Communications and Metropolitan Area Networks Specific Magazine, IEEE 43.9 (2005): S23-S30. Requirements – Part 11: Wireless LAN 18. Q. Ni, L. Romdhani, T. Turletti, A survey of Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical QoS enhancements for IEEE 802.11 wireless Layer (PHY) Amendment 3: Specification for LAN, Wiley Journal of Wireless Operation in Additional Regulatory Domains, Communications and Mobile Computing4 (5) 2001. (2004) 547–566. 9. IEEE 802.11e-2005, IEEE Standard for Local 19. Konsgen, A., Zakir Hossain, and Carmelita and Metropolitan Area Networks Specific Gorg. "Transmit power control algorithms in Requirements – Part 11: Wireless LAN .11 h based networks." Personal, Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, Layer (PHY) Specifications MAC 2005. PIMRC 2005. IEEE 16th International Enhancements for QoS, 2005. Symposium on. Vol. 3. IEEE, 2005. 10. A.E. Xhafa, S. Kangude, X. Lu, MAC 20. IEEE 802.11i-2004, IEEE Standard for Local Performance of IEEE 802.16e, IEEE 62nd and Metropolitan Area Networks Specific Vehicular Technology Conference 2005 (VTC Requirements – Part 11: Wireless LAN ’05) vol. 1. Dallas, TX, USA, 2005, pp. 685– Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical 689. Layer (PHY) Specifications Amendment 6: 11. D.J. Leith, P. Clifford, Using the 802.11e Medium Access Control (MAC) Security EDCF to achieve TCP upload fairness over Enhancements, July 23, 2004. WLAN links, in: 3rd International Symposium 21. S. Fluhrer, I. Mantin, A. Shamir, Weakness in on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad the key scheduling algorithm of RC4, in: Hoc, and Wireless Networks 2004 (WiOPT Springer Eighth Annual Workshop on Selected ‘05) Trentino, Italy, 2005, pp. 109–118. Areas in Cryptography 2001 (SAC ’01), vol. 12. Y.P. Fallah, H. Alnuweiri, A controlled-access 2259, Toronto, Canada, 2001, pp. 1–24. scheduling mechanism for QoS provisioning in 22. J. McNair, T. Tugcu, W. Wang, J. Xie, A IEEE 802.11e wireless LANs, in: 1st ACM survey of crosslayer performance

Preprint: http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.7633 Original Publication:

enhancements for mobile IP networks, Elsevier communications and mobile computing. ACM, Computer Networks Journal 49 (2) (2005) 19– 2006. 294. 33. Wang, Jianfeng, Monisha Ghosh, and Kiran 23. 802.11k-IEEE Standard for Information hallapali. "Emerging cognitive radio technology-Local and metropolitan area applications: A survey." Communications networks-Specific requirements-Part 11: Magazine, IEEE 49.3 (2011): 74-81. Wireless LAN Medium Access Control 34. Carrano, Ricardo C., et al. "IEEE 802.11s (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) multihop MAC: A tutorial."Communications Specifications Amendment 1: Radio Resource Surveys & Tutorials, IEEE 13.1 (2011): 52-67. Measurement of Wireless LANs, 2008. 35. P. Djukic, S. Valaee, “802.16 MCF for 24. Rabaey, Jan, et al. "Connectivity brokerage- 802.11a based mesh networks: a case for enabling seamless cooperation in wireless standards re-use” in: 23rd IEEE Biennial networks." White Paper), Sept (2010). Symposium on Communications 2006, 25. Y. Xiao, “IEEE 802.11n: enhancements for Kingston, Ont., Canada, 2006, pp. 186–189. higher throughput in wireless LANs”, IEEE 36. D. Molta, “Primer: mesh configurations Wireless Communications 12 (6) (2005) 82– applications make a mesh of your WLAN”, 91. Network Computing 11 (17) (2005) 67–71. 26. J.M. Gilbert, W. Choi, Q. Sun, MIMO 37. D. Maniezzo, G. Villa, M. Gerla, “A smart technology for advanced wireless local area MAC-routing protocol for WLAN mesh networks, in: 42nd Annual Conference on networks”, UCLA-CSD Technical Report Design Automation 2005 (DAC ’05), number 040032, 2004. Anaheim, CA, USA, 2005, pp. 413–415. 38. Stankiewicz, Rafal, Piotr Cholda, and Andrzej 27. Skordoulis, Dionysios, et al. "IEEE 802.11 n Jajszczyk. "QoX: what is it MAC frame aggregation mechanisms for next- really?." Communications Magazine, generation high-throughput IEEE 49.4 (2011): 148-158. WLANs." Wireless Communications, 39. Khan, Bilal, and Jong-Suk Ahn. "A IEEE 15.1 (2008): 40-47. performance model for the effect of 28. Perahia, Eldad. "IEEE 802.11 n development: interferences among the collocated history, process, and heterogeneous wireless networks."Advanced technology." Communications Magazine, Communication Technology (ICACT), 2013 IEEE 46.7 (2008): 48-55. 15th International Conference on. IEEE, 2013. 29. Jiang, Daniel, and Luca Delgrossi. "IEEE 40. Kim, Eunsun, and Yongho Seok. "Method for 802.11 p: Towards an international standard Operating a Station in a White Space, and for wireless access in vehicular Apparatus for Same." U.S. Patent No. environments." Vehicular Technology 20,130,109,403. 2 May 2013. Conference, 2008. VTC Spring 2008. IEEE. 41. Perahia, Eldad, et al. "IEEE 802.11 ad: IEEE, 2008. Defining the next generation multi-Gbps Wi- 30. Wellens, Matthias, Burkhard Westphal, and Fi." Consumer Communications and Petri Mahonen. "Performance evaluation of Networking Conference (CCNC), 2010 7th IEEE 802.11-based WLANs in vehicular IEEE. IEEE, 2010. scenarios." Vehicular Technology Conference, 42. Cordeiro, Carlos, Dmitry Akhmetov, and 2007. VTC2007-Spring. IEEE 65th. IEEE, Minyoung Park. "Ieee 802.11 ad: introduction 2007. and performance evaluation of the first multi- 31. Hartenstein, Hannes, and Kenneth P. gbps wifi technology."Proceedings of the 2010 Laberteaux. "A tutorial survey on vehicular ad ACM international workshop on mmWave hoc networks." Communications Magazine, communications: from circuits to networks. IEEE 46.6 (2008): 164-171. ACM, 2010. 32. Bangolae, Sangeetha, Carol Bell, and Emily 43. Zhu, Hua, et al. "Distributed Admission Qi. "Performance study of fast BSS transition Control for IEEE 802.11 Ad Hoc Networks." using IEEE 802.11 r." Proceedings of the 2006 (2013). international conference on Wireless

Preprint: http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.7633 Original Publication:

44. Zhao, Fang, et al. "Comparison of analytical 46. Ong, Eng Hwee, et al. "IEEE 802.11 ac: and measured performance results on network Enhancements for very high throughput coding in IEEE 802.11 ad-hoc WLANs." Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio networks." Network Coding (NetCod), 2012 Communications (PIMRC), 2011 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on. IEEE, 2012. International Symposium on. IEEE, 2011. 45. Banerji, Sourangsu. "On IEEE 802.11: Wireless LAN Technology." arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.2661 (2013).