Are Breakthroughs Foreseeable? Page 2 Page 3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Are Breakthroughs Foreseeable? Page 2 Page 3 Research Fields for the Medicine of Tomorrow Are Breakthroughs Foreseeable? Page 2 Page 3 Dear Readers, Friends and Partners of the Imprint Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung, Editor Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung Content Editor PD Dr. Susanne Schultz-Hector Can we predict groundbreaking scientific discoveries? A look back in time Contents (officially liable under German press law) suggests not – and the path to scientific progress is just as unpredictable. Nevertheless, the allocation of finite funding requires decisions that can 2 Publication Details Managing Editor Christiane Löll only be made based on assumptions. Both public and private research funding is an investment in the future. With the Else Kröner Fresenius 3 Editorial Translation Sternkopf Communications, Lisa Wicklund Preis für Medizinische Forschung 2017, we hope to provide momentum to a particularly promising research field by making resources available 4 Scope for Creativity Art Director Angelika Schwarz to a prominent scientist in this area. EKFS would therefore like to create a framework that will give the prizewinner the opportunity to make substantial 6 Can We Predict Picture Editor Beatrice Jansen progress in their work and inspire talented young scientists to enter the field. Breakthroughs? A major criteria for selecting a prizewinner is of course our appreciation Fact-checking Christian Schwan for the individual’s achievements to date. In 2013, immunologist Ruslan 12 Heading for the Next Else Kröner Medzhitov from Yale University received the prize. Fresenius Preis für Medizinische Publisher TEMPUS CORPORATE GmbH – Forschung 2017 a member of Die ZEIT publishing group The first step toward conferring the 2017 prize is to identify a research Office Berlin Askanischer Platz 3, 10963 Berlin field for nominations. This has led us to becoming involved in an exciting 15 The Next Generation takes Center Office Hamburg Buceriusstraße, Eingang Speersort 1, 20095 Hamburg process of reflection on scientific theory and history in two workshops. Stage Alongside Nobel Prize winners, senior editors of leading scientific jour- Project Managers Dr. Regine Brandtner, Maria Einhorn nals and young scientists with a fresh perspective took part in animated 17 A Workshop with Intelligent Minds discussions. We therefore tapped into the driving force behind science Production Torsten Bastian (resp.), Dirk Woschei and that which forms its beating heart: intelligent minds uniting creativ- 23 A Letter from the World of Research ity and passion. In the hope of sparking your interest, we are reporting on Printing G. Peschke Druckerei GmbH, the progress of our search in this booklet. 24 Image: Research Fields for Taxetstraße 4, 85599 Parsdorf b. München Tomorrow’s Medicine Contact Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung Postfach 1852, 61288 Bad Homburg v. d. H. Telefon: +49 6172 8975-0 Telefax: +49 6172 8975-15 [email protected] www.ekfs.de Dr. Susanne Schultz-Hector Member of the Executive Board Photos/Illustrations/Paintings p. 4: Heinrich Völkel/Ostkreuz Agency, p. 5: Wolfgang Leidhold, Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung p. 6-9: skizzomat/Marie Luise Emmermann, p. 10: © 2012 Börner / Quelle: PLoS ONE: www.plosone.org, p. 12-16: Heinrich Völkel/ Ostkreuz Agency, p. 18: The Swedish Cancer Society, p. 18-21: Christian Flemming/Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings, p. 23: © MFPL, Daniel Hinterramskogler, p. 24-25: EKFS Tomorrows Medicine Field Workshop, Matthias Weitbrecht und Tami Tolpa Page 4 interview Page 5 Scope for Creativity How do You Arrive at a theory in Science? The knot is a historic symbol for the opaqueness of our world How can we initiate creativity? and cosmos. within itself it is highly regular. But we see only The primary hindrance here is our own inner resistance. There its outer aspect and not what is inside. One can definitely take is a naysayer within all of us who speaks up when we want to it as a symbol for the knowledge-based society, devoted to accomplish something new. it says: »Oh, just leave it. it is a stu- unraveling complex knots. pid idea. Better to carry on with what has already been suc- For his knot paintings, Wolfgang Leidhold cessful so far.« it took me a whole year to get away from the used self-made egg tempera and oil paints. He drew his inspiration from the Gordian You hold seminars in creative theory formation. What knot theme in my painting. knot which Alexander the Great once sliced are you trying to convey to the new generation of medical through with his sword. Leidhold also took professionals? When my inner inhibition stands in my way – how do I deal the Omphalos of Delphi, symbol for the cosmos, as his inspiration. Basically, it is about communicating a clear picture of the re- with this? search process. Of course, we know the process from scientific recognizing our inner inhibition as a merely psychological practice – but it also helps to get a bird’s eye view of the logical barrier, and not as a intuitive counter argument, is the first and methodical aspects. This is essential in order to identify the step in overcoming it. everything unfamiliar provokes unease, exact point in the process where creativity comes into play. resistance. As soon as we realize that this resistance does not constitute a valid argument against a new idea, we will easily You have developed a simple model that describes how cre- defy it. All creative people – whether artists, research ers or ativity finds its way into the formation of theories. Could you mystics – constantly come up against this archetypal inner clarify this? naysayer. One does well to anticipate it turning up – then The process develops in a cycle comprising four stations: pushing it politely to one side. starting with the theoretical principles (1) to the observa- As both political scientist and artist, how do you yourself Wolfgang Leidhold is an artist – as well as Professor of tions and experiments derived therefrom (2) and further to Are there other things that block creativity? come up with ideas? Political Theory and the History of Ideas at the University the analysis of the new findings thus gained (3). Finally, it is There are internal and external barriers. Besides the naysayer, to begin with, i take each thought seriously. Any idea will be of Cologne. The role of creativity in the process of theory down to classification into that which is already known. This there is a corresponding tendency to accept the familiar. As entered in my diary, an artistic thought in a sketchbook or on formation is one of the subjects he teaches to young scien- process runs smoothly while everything remains inherently creatures of habit, we love the established, the trusted, the ac- a sketching sheet. The question of whether it is beneficial and tists from different fields. In its quest for a promising field self-consistent and as long as no surprises crop up. cepted. A third opponent of creativity is the blind spot – we useful comes much later. of research for the next Else Kröner Fresenius Preis für if something unexpected should turn up in steps (2) and overlook, we ignore deviating observations, things which do in my experience, artistic and intellectual creativity Medizinische Forschung in 2017, EKFS is also involved in (3), then a discovery happens. Sometimes it is possible to not fit our grid pattern. we say: we will attend to that later – or: it strengthen each other interactively. whether that be music, similar questions. integrate the unexpected into the accepted theory by intro- is not so important. painting or poetry: to be productive yourself in any of these are- ducing minor modifications. when that does not work, the A typical external barrier, for instance, is a climate of co- as in a playful way is highly efficient– it strengthens the intellec- Professor Leidhold, as a painter, the knot is one of your theory has to be changed. we must then risk a new hypoth- formism in the scientific community; just as obstructive are tual area of our psyche and also stimulates creativity. But it is motifs – not as a simple fastening device but as a complex esis, and this is station (4). At this point we have the space time pressure, publication stress and a lack of leeway – thus a important to become productive yourself. Just look ing at pictu- labyrinth. Is it a symbol for the knowledge-based society? for creativity. lack of encouragement towards »playful« trial and error. res or reading history is of no use. Page 6 Cover Story Page 7 The Greatest Challenge of All Can We Predict Breakthroughs? It is a great challenge to find a promising research field for Jenner had thus cleared the way for vaccines against numer- the mind of a great scientist. »the greatest achievements in ing his investigations. Instead of disregarding the protein as a the Else Kröner Fresenius Preis für Medizinische Forschung ous infectious diseases. science are the consequence of talented and mentally pre- distraction or interference, Agre analyzed it and came to un- 2017. We can start by looking back in time. How do break- Meanwhile, the birth of modern antibiotics can be traced pared individuals who are able to recognize unexpected re- derstand its significance over a year later: the protein forms throughs come about, and who or what is the driving force back to Scotsman Alexander Fleming, who returned to an sults, draw conclusions, and then follow them wherever they aqueous channels in the cell membrane (aquaporins). behind them? At the same time, this is really only a start- experiment on bacteria after a short holiday in 1928. Aston- lead,« wrote geneticist and chairman of the renowned Lasker the phenomenon is aptly summed up by the word ing point – because medical research is a fast-moving field. ished, he realized that his experiment was completely ruined; Award jury, Joseph Goldstein, in the scientific journal Nature serendipity, which originates from a fairy tale about good Here is an overview of where we are now.
Recommended publications
  • 書 名 等 発行年 出版社 受賞年 備考 N1 Ueber Das Zustandekommen Der
    書 名 等 発行年 出版社 受賞年 備考 Ueber das Zustandekommen der Diphtherie-immunitat und der Tetanus-Immunitat bei thieren / Emil Adolf N1 1890 Georg thieme 1901 von Behring N2 Diphtherie und tetanus immunitaet / Emil Adolf von Behring und Kitasato 19-- [Akitomo Matsuki] 1901 Malarial fever its cause, prevention and treatment containing full details for the use of travellers, University press of N3 1902 1902 sportsmen, soldiers, and residents in malarious places / by Ronald Ross liverpool Ueber die Anwendung von concentrirten chemischen Lichtstrahlen in der Medicin / von Prof. Dr. Niels N4 1899 F.C.W.Vogel 1903 Ryberg Finsen Mit 4 Abbildungen und 2 Tafeln Twenty-five years of objective study of the higher nervous activity (behaviour) of animals / Ivan N5 Petrovitch Pavlov ; translated and edited by W. Horsley Gantt ; with the collaboration of G. Volborth ; and c1928 International Publishing 1904 an introduction by Walter B. Cannon Conditioned reflexes : an investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex / by Ivan Oxford University N6 1927 1904 Petrovitch Pavlov ; translated and edited by G.V. Anrep Press N7 Die Ätiologie und die Bekämpfung der Tuberkulose / Robert Koch ; eingeleitet von M. Kirchner 1912 J.A.Barth 1905 N8 Neue Darstellung vom histologischen Bau des Centralnervensystems / von Santiago Ramón y Cajal 1893 Veit 1906 Traité des fiévres palustres : avec la description des microbes du paludisme / par Charles Louis Alphonse N9 1884 Octave Doin 1907 Laveran N10 Embryologie des Scorpions / von Ilya Ilyich Mechnikov 1870 Wilhelm Engelmann 1908 Immunität bei Infektionskrankheiten / Ilya Ilyich Mechnikov ; einzig autorisierte übersetzung von Julius N11 1902 Gustav Fischer 1908 Meyer Die experimentelle Chemotherapie der Spirillosen : Syphilis, Rückfallfieber, Hühnerspirillose, Frambösie / N12 1910 J.Springer 1908 von Paul Ehrlich und S.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Woche Spezial
    In cooperation with DIE WOCHE SPEZIAL >> Autographs>vs.>#NobelSelfie Special >> Big>Data>–>not>a>big>deal,> Edition just>another>tool >> Why>Don’t>Grasshoppers> Catch>Colds? SCIENCE SUMMIT The>64th>Lindau>Nobel>Laureate>Meeting> devoted>to>Physiology>and>Medicine More than 600 young scientists came to Lindau to meet 37 Nobel laureates CAREER WONGSANIT > Women>to>Women: SUPHAKIT > / > Science>and>Family FOTOLIA INFLAMMATION The>Stress>of>Ageing > FLASHPICS > / > MEETINGS > FOTOLIA LAUREATE > CANCER RESEARCH NOBEL > LINDAU > / > J.>Michael>Bishop>and GÄRTNER > FLEMMING > JUAN > / the>Discovery>of>the>first> > CHRISTIAN FOTOLIA Human>Oncogene EDITORIAL IMPRESSUM Chefredakteur: Prof. Dr. Carsten Könneker (v.i.S.d.P.) Dear readers, Redaktionsleiter: Dr. Daniel Lingenhöhl Redaktion: Antje Findeklee, Jan Dönges, Dr. Jan Osterkamp where>else>can>aspiring>young>scientists> Ständige Mitarbeiter: Lars Fischer Art Director Digital: Marc Grove meet>the>best>researchers>of>the>world> Layout: Oliver Gabriel Schlussredaktion: Christina Meyberg (Ltg.), casually,>and>discuss>their>research,>or>their> Sigrid Spies, Katharina Werle Bildredaktion: Alice Krüßmann (Ltg.), Anke Lingg, Gabriela Rabe work>–>or>pressing>global>problems?>Or> Verlag: Spektrum der Wissenschaft Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Slevogtstraße 3–5, 69126 Heidelberg, Tel. 06221 9126-600, simply>discuss>soccer?>Probably>the>best> Fax 06221 9126-751; Amtsgericht Mannheim, HRB 338114, UStd-Id-Nr. DE147514638 occasion>is>the>annual>Lindau>Nobel>Laure- Geschäftsleitung: Markus Bossle, Thomas Bleck Marketing und Vertrieb: Annette Baumbusch (Ltg.) Leser- und Bestellservice: Helga Emmerich, Sabine Häusser, ate>Meeting>in>the>lovely>Bavarian>town>of> Ute Park, Tel. 06221 9126-743, E-Mail: [email protected] Lindau>on>Lake>Constance. Die Spektrum der Wissenschaft Verlagsgesellschaft mbH ist Kooperati- onspartner des Nationalen Instituts für Wissenschaftskommunikation Daniel>Lingenhöhl> GmbH (NaWik).
    [Show full text]
  • Tomaso A. Poggio
    BK-SFN-NEUROSCIENCE-131211-09_Poggio.indd 362 16/04/14 5:25 PM Tomaso A. Poggio BORN: Genova, Italy September 11, 1947 EDUCATION: University of Genoa, PhD in Physics, Summa cum laude (1971) APPOINTMENTS: Wissenschaftlicher Assistant, Max Planck Institut für Biologische Kybernetik, Tubingen, Germany (1978) Associate Professor (with tenure), Department of Psychology and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1981) Uncas and Helen Whitaker Chair, Department of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1988) Eugene McDermott Professor, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory and McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2002) HONORS AND AWARDS (SELECTED): Otto-Hahn-Medaille of the Max Planck Society (1979) Member, Neurosciences Research Program (1979) Columbus Prize of the Istituto Internazionale delle Comunicazioni Genoa, Italy (1982) Corporate Fellow, Thinking Machines Corporation (1984) Founding Fellow, American Association of Artificial Intelligence (1990) Fellow, American Academy of Arts and Sciences (1997) Foreign Member, Istituto Lombardo dell’Accademia di Scienze e Lettere (1998) Laurea Honoris Causa in Ingegneria Informatica, Bicentenario dell’Invezione della Pila, Pavia, Italia, March (2000) Gabor Award, International Neural Network Society (2003) Okawa Prize (2009) Fellow, American Association for the Advancement of Science (2009) Tomaso Poggio began his career in collaboration
    [Show full text]
  • 365-369 POSTERS Sunda
    365-369 POSTERS Sunda as a cold-sensitive allele in vivo. Our earlier analyses have the relaxed fiber at an ionic strength of 30 mM. Despite differences revealed that: (1) G680V exhibits reduced basal and actin-activated in magnitude, in all cases the frequency dependent stiffness ATPase activities; (2) it cannot move actin filaments and inhibits showed similar characteristics. The stiffness of the relaxed fiber at movement by wild type myosin in mixed assays; (3) it cosediments low ionic strength and the rigor stiffness after unloading at 30 mM with actin even in the presence of ATP, but not in the presence of closely coincided. No indication of attachment and/or detachment ATPyS; (4) its defects in vivo are suppressed by combining with a of cross bridges was observed in the spectrum of stiffness of the second mutation that accelerates Pi release. Here we report that relaxed fiber (in agreement with Bagni et al, G680V SI was unable to quench fluorescence of pyrene-actin in J.Electromyogr.Kinesiol.,1999). The present results indicate that the presence of ATP. In contrast, it quenched the pyrene the remainder of stiffness of the unloaded rigor is carried by fluorescence in the presence of ADP, indicating that an extended unloaded cross bridges. ADP-bound state cannot account for its excessive actin binding in the presence of ATP. Taken together, it was suggested that the Muscle Regulatory Proteins ATPase cycle of acto-G680V is blocked in a strongly bound 1 A.S .ADP.Pi state, or the "A state" of the 3G model (Geeves et al., 368-Pos Board # B224 1984).
    [Show full text]
  • KITCHEN CHEMISTRY Bijeta Roynath & Prasanta Kumar Sahoo
    Test Your Knowledge KITCHEN CHEMISTRY Bijeta Roynath & Prasanta Kumar Sahoo 1. The common cooking fuel, Liquefied Petroleum Gas 10. Which of the following could be produced by the gas (LPG), is a mixture of two hydrocarbons. These are: stove? (a) Methane and Butane (b) Propane and Butane (a) Nitrogen Oxides (b) Sulphur dioxides (c) Oxygen and Hydrogen (d) Hexane and Propane (c) Carbon monoxide (d) Dihydrogen oxide 2. Hydrocarbons in LPG are colourless and odourless. 11. Which of the following chemical is found in dish- Therefore, a strong smelling agent added to LPG washing detergent? cylinders to detect leakage is: (a) Carbon monoxide (b) Chlorine (a) Ethyl mercaptan (b) Nitrous oxide (c) Sulphur dioxide (d) Lithium (c) Hydrogen sulfide (d) Chloroform 12. Proteins help build our body and carbohydrates 3. Chemical irritant produced during chopping an provide energy to the body. The protein and onion (Allium cepa) which makes our eye weepy is: carbohydrate found in milk are: (a) Allinase (b) Sulfoxide (a) Albumin and maltose (b) Pepsin and sucrose (c) Syn-propanethial-S-oxide (d) Allyl mercaptan (c) Collagen and fructose (d) Casein and lactose 4. The powerful anti-inflammatory and antioxidant 13. Salt readily absorbs water from the surroundings. properties of haldi or turmeric (Curcuma longa) are Sprinkling salt on salad releases water from it after due to presence of: few seconds. The process is: (a) Curcumin (b) Gingerol (a) Osmosis (b) Adsorption (c) Cymene (d) Capsaicin (c) Dehydration (d) Oxidation 5. The active ingredient in chilli peppers (Capsicum) 14. Washing hands before eating prevents illness which produces heat and burning sensation in the by killing germs.
    [Show full text]
  • Federation Member Society Nobel Laureates
    FEDERATION MEMBER SOCIETY NOBEL LAUREATES For achievements in Chemistry, Physiology/Medicine, and PHysics. Award Winners announced annually in October. Awards presented on December 10th, the anniversary of Nobel’s death. (-H represents Honorary member, -R represents Retired member) # YEAR AWARD NAME AND SOCIETY DOB DECEASED 1 1904 PM Ivan Petrovich Pavlov (APS-H) 09/14/1849 02/27/1936 for work on the physiology of digestion, through which knowledge on vital aspects of the subject has been transformed and enlarged. 2 1912 PM Alexis Carrel (APS/ASIP) 06/28/1873 01/05/1944 for work on vascular suture and the transplantation of blood vessels and organs 3 1919 PM Jules Bordet (AAI-H) 06/13/1870 04/06/1961 for discoveries relating to immunity 4 1920 PM August Krogh (APS-H) 11/15/1874 09/13/1949 (Schack August Steenberger Krogh) for discovery of the capillary motor regulating mechanism 5 1922 PM A. V. Hill (APS-H) 09/26/1886 06/03/1977 Sir Archibald Vivial Hill for discovery relating to the production of heat in the muscle 6 1922 PM Otto Meyerhof (ASBMB) 04/12/1884 10/07/1951 (Otto Fritz Meyerhof) for discovery of the fixed relationship between the consumption of oxygen and the metabolism of lactic acid in the muscle 7 1923 PM Frederick Grant Banting (ASPET) 11/14/1891 02/21/1941 for the discovery of insulin 8 1923 PM John J.R. Macleod (APS) 09/08/1876 03/16/1935 (John James Richard Macleod) for the discovery of insulin 9 1926 C Theodor Svedberg (ASBMB-H) 08/30/1884 02/26/1971 for work on disperse systems 10 1930 PM Karl Landsteiner (ASIP/AAI) 06/14/1868 06/26/1943 for discovery of human blood groups 11 1931 PM Otto Heinrich Warburg (ASBMB-H) 10/08/1883 08/03/1970 for discovery of the nature and mode of action of the respiratory enzyme 12 1932 PM Lord Edgar D.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Cite Complete Issue More Information About This Article
    Revista de la Facultad de Medicina ISSN: 2357-3848 ISSN: 0120-0011 Universidad Nacional de Colombia Barco-Ríos, John; Duque-Parra, Jorge Eduardo; Barco-Cano, Johanna Alexandra From substance fermentation to action potential in modern science (part two) Revista de la Facultad de Medicina, vol. 66, no. 4, 2018, October-December, pp. 623-627 Universidad Nacional de Colombia DOI: 10.15446/revfacmed.v66n4.65552 Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=576364271017 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Rev. Fac. Med. 2018 Vol. 66 No. 4: 623-7 623 REFLECTION PAPER DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v66n4.65552 From substance fermentation to action potential in modern science (part two) De la fermentación de sustancias al potencial de acción en la ciencia moderna (segunda parte) Received: 08/06/2017. Accepted: 12/12/2017. John Barco-Ríos1,2 • Jorge Eduardo Duque-Parra1,2 • Johanna Alexandra Barco-Cano2,3 1 Universidad de Caldas - Faculty of Health Sciences - Department of Basic Sciences - Manizales - Colombia. 2 Universidad de Caldas - Department of Basic Sciences - Caldas Neuroscience Group - Manizales - Colombia. 3 Universidad de Caldas - Faculty of Health Sciences - Clinical Department - Manizales - Colombia. Corresponding author: John Barco-Ríos. Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de Caldas. Calle 65 No. 26-10, office: M203. Telephone number: +57 6 8781500. Manizales. Colombia. Email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Molecular Machinery of Neurotransmitter Release Nobel Lecture, 7 December 2013
    The Molecular Machinery of Neurotransmitter Release Nobel Lecture, 7 December 2013 by Thomas C. Südhof Dept. of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, USA. 1. THE NEUROTRANSMITTER RELEASE ENIGMA Synapses have a long history in science. Synapses were frst functionally demon- strated by Emil duBois-Reymond (1818–1896), were morphologically identifed by classical neuroanatomists such as Rudolf von Kölliker (1817–1905) and San- tiago Ramon y Cajal (1852–1934), and named in 1897 by Michael Foster (1836– 1907). Although the chemical nature of synaptic transmission was already sug- gested by duBois-Reymond, it was long disputed because of its incredible speed. Over time, however, overwhelming evidence established that most synapses use chemical messengers called neurotransmitters, most notably with the pioneer- ing contributions by Otto Loewi (1873–1961), Henry Dale (1875–1968), Ulf von Euler (1905–1983), and Julius Axelrod (1912–2004). In parallel, arguably the most important advance to understanding how synapses work was provided by Bernard Katz (1911–2003), who elucidated the principal mechanism of syn- aptic transmission (Katz, 1969). Most initial studies on synapses were carried out on the neuromuscular junction, and central synapses have only come to the fore in recent decades. Here, major contributions by many scientists, including George Palade, Rodolfo Llinas, Chuck Stevens, Bert Sakmann, Eric Kandel, and Victor Whittaker, to name just a few, not only confrmed the principal results obtained in the neuromuscular junction by Katz, but also revealed that synapses 259 6490_Book.indb 259 11/4/14 2:29 PM 260 The Nobel Prizes exhibit an enormous diversity of properties as well as an unexpected capacity for plasticity.
    [Show full text]
  • Legacy of Leadership NOBEL PRIZE WINNERS
    Legacy of Leadership NOBEL PRIZE WINNERS 43 Fulbright Alumni Awarded the Nobel Prize The Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs of the U.S. Department of State, sponsor of the Fulbright Program, recognizes 43 alumni of the Fulbright Program from 11 countries who have been awarded the Nobel Prize for their contributions to humanity. Nobel Laureates are listed in order of their award’s receipt, with the most recent first. Peter A. Diamond – U.S.A. Roy J. Glauber – U.S.A. Nobel Laureate in Economics 2010 Nobel Laureate in Physics 2005 Fulbright Scholar in Italy, 1999-00 Fulbright Scholar in France, 1954-55 Ei-ichi Negishi – Japan Nobel Laureate in Chemistry 2010 Aaron Ciechanover – Israel Fulbright Student at University of Nobel Laureate in Chemistry 2004 Pennsylvania, 1960-63 Fulbright Scholar at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1981-84 Muhammad Yunus Oliver Williamson – U.S.A. Nobel Laureate in Economics 2009 Ei-ichi Negishi Riccardo Giacconi – Italy Nobel Laureate in Physics 2002 Fulbright Scholar in Italy, 1999 Fulbright Student at Indiana University, 1956-58 Jean-Marie Le Clézio – France Nobel Laureate in Literature 2008 Masatoshi Koshiba – Japan Fulbright Scholar at University of Nobel Laureate in Physics 2002 California-Santa Cruz, 1979 Fulbright Student at University of Rochester, 1953-55 Osamu Shimomura – Japan Nobel Laureate in Chemistry 2008 George A. Akerlof – U.S.A. Fulbright Scholar at Princeton Nobel Laureate in Economics University, 1960 2001 Aaron Ciechanover Osamu Shimomura Fulbright Scholar in India, 1967-68 Leonid Hurwicz – U.S.A. Nobel Laureate in Economics 2007 Joseph Stiglitz – U.S.A. Fulbright Scholar in India, 1965-66 Nobel Laureate in Economics 2001 Fulbright Student in the United Muhammad Yunus – Bangladesh Kingdom, 1969-70 Nobel Peace Prize 2006 Fulbright Student at University of Alan G.
    [Show full text]
  • Close to the Edge: Co-Authorship Proximity of Nobel Laureates in Physiology Or Medicine, 1991 - 2010, to Cross-Disciplinary Brokers
    Close to the edge: Co-authorship proximity of Nobel laureates in Physiology or Medicine, 1991 - 2010, to cross-disciplinary brokers Chris Fields 528 Zinnia Court Sonoma, CA 95476 USA fi[email protected] January 2, 2015 Abstract Between 1991 and 2010, 45 scientists were honored with Nobel prizes in Physiology or Medicine. It is shown that these 45 Nobel laureates are separated, on average, by at most 2.8 co-authorship steps from at least one cross-disciplinary broker, defined as a researcher who has published co-authored papers both in some biomedical discipline and in some non-biomedical discipline. If Nobel laureates in Physiology or Medicine and their immediate collaborators can be regarded as forming the intuitive “center” of the biomedical sciences, then at least for this 20-year sample of Nobel laureates, the center of the biomedical sciences within the co-authorship graph of all of the sciences is closer to the edges of multiple non-biomedical disciplines than typical biomedical researchers are to each other. Keywords: Biomedicine; Co-authorship graphs; Cross-disciplinary brokerage; Graph cen- trality; Preferential attachment Running head: Proximity of Nobel laureates to cross-disciplinary brokers 1 1 Introduction It is intuitively tempting to visualize scientific disciplines as spheres, with highly produc- tive, well-funded intellectual and political leaders such as Nobel laureates occupying their centers and less productive, less well-funded researchers being increasingly peripheral. As preferential attachment mechanisms as well as the economics of employment tend to give the well-known and well-funded more collaborators than the less well-known and less well- funded (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Declaration Accepted by the Plenary Meeting of the Nobel Laureates at the PETRA IV Meeting on 19 June 2008 and Released by the Elie Wiesel Foundation
    Declaration accepted by the Plenary Meeting of the Nobel Laureates at the PETRA IV Meeting on 19 June 2008 and released by the Elie Wiesel Foundation We, undersigned Nobel Laureates, commend the remarkable progress made in creating the SESAME Synchrotron Light Source. It will provide a major center for scientific research, with ownership shared by many nations of the Middle East. Thereby, SESAME, as well as producing educational and economic benefits, will serve as a beacon, demonstrating how shared scientific initiatives can help light the way towards peace. We urge all friends of science and peace to lend their encouragement and support to this exemplary project. Signed by 44 Laureates (see list below) Kenneth J. Arrow Economics 1972 Günter Blobel Physiology or Medicine 1999 Paul D. Boyer Chemistry 1997 Aaron Ciechanover Chemistry 2004 Claude Cohen-Tannoudji Physics 1997 Elias James Corey Chemistry 1990 Paul J. Crutzen Chemistry 1995 Frederik W. de Klerk Peace 1993 Johann Deisenhofer Chemistry 1988 Sir Martin J. Evans Physiology or Medicine 2007 John B. Fenn Chemistry 2002 Edmond H. Fischer Physiology or Medicine 1992 Jerome I. Friedman Physics 1990 Donald A. Glaser Physics 1960 Clive W.J. Granger Economics 2003 Paul Greengard Physiology or Medicine 2000 David J. Gross Physics 2004 Roger Guillemin Physiology or Medicine 1977 Dudley R. Herschbach Chemistry 1986 Avram Hershko Chemistry 2004 Roald Hoffmann Chemistry 1981 John Hume Peace 1998 Eric R. Kandel Physiology or Medicine 2000 Roger D. Kornberg Chemistry 2006 Finn E. Kydland Economics 2004 Yuan T. Lee Chemistry 1986 Jean-Marie Lehn Chemistry 1987 Rudolph A. Marcus Chemistry 1992 Craig C.
    [Show full text]
  • August 6Th, 2009 SCIENTISTS for a NUCLEAR WEAPONS-FREE WORLD Scientists and Engineers Bear a Heavy Burden of Responsibility to S
    Schützenstr. 6a 10117 Berlin, Germany Phone: +49 (0) 30-20 65 38 31 Fax: +49 (0) 30- 21234057 [email protected] www.inesglobal.com August 6th, 2009 SCIENTISTS FOR A NUCLEAR WEAPONS-FREE WORLD Scientists and engineers bear a heavy burden of responsibility to society for the creation of nuclear weapons. The immense destructive power of these weapons was demonstrated on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and in over 2,000 atmospheric and underground nuclear tests on the lands of indigenous peoples. Thermonuclear weapons are capable of destroying cities, countries and civilization. They could end intelligent life on Earth. Humanity has been warned again and again of the perils of nuclear weapons and nuclear war. We recall the Russell-Einstein Manifesto, issued on July 9, 1955. The Manifesto warned, “Here, then, is the problem which we present to you, stark and dreadful and inescapable: Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?” Human fallibility and nuclear weapons are a dangerous and unacceptable mix. We rely upon human theories concerning nuclear weapons, such as the theory of nuclear deterrence, at our peril. Since Nagasaki, humankind has been spared nuclear war far more by good fortune than by sound planning. This good fortune will not be possible to maintain indefinitely – particularly, as is foreseeable, if nuclear weapons continue to proliferate and fall into the hands of non-state extremist groups. Nuclear weapons were created by humans, and it is our responsibility to eliminate them before they eliminate us and much of the life on our planet.
    [Show full text]