DOCSLIB.ORG

Solar Ready II FINAL REPORT May 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Solar Ready II FINAL REPORT May 2016 Solar Ready II FINAL REPORT May 2016 Solar Ready II MID-AMERICA REGIONAL COUNCIL Solar Ready II | Final Report Solar Ready II participants Northwestern Indiana Regional Planning Commission (NIRPC) Population of engaged jurisdictions: 515,384 Central New York Regional Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Planning and Development Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Council of Governments (OKI) Board (CNYRPDB) (MWCOG) Population of engaged Population of engaged Population of engaged jurisdictions: 4.2 million jurisdictions: 411,760 jurisdictions: 1.9 million Delaware Valley Regional Southwest Florida Regional Mid-American Regional Council Planning Council (SWFRPC) Planning Commission (DVRPC) (MARC) Population of engaged Population of engaged jurisdictions: 1.44 million Population of engaged jurisdictions: 2.2 million jurisdictions: 1.6 million Maricopa Association North Central Texas Council of Tampa Bay Regional Planning of Governments (MAG) Governments (NCTCOG) Council (TBRPC) Population of engaged Population of engaged Population of engaged jurisdictions: 3.56 million jurisdictions: 4.64 million jurisdictions: 2.4 million Contents Executive Summary....................3 Detailed Narrative .......................8 Major Findings ............................13 SRII Partner Reports ..................15 Conclusion ..................................28 Appendix.....................................30 page 2 | Solar Ready II | Final Report Executive Summary Solar Ready II by the numbers... 2.5 Years 277 Jurisdictions 408 Events, 34 Webinars 13,444 Participants 626 Solar Contracts 4.91 MW Solar The major objective of the Solar Ready II (SRII) project was to expand the proven collaborative approach of the Solar Ready KC initiative — a DOE Rooftop Solar Challenge project launched in the Kansas City metropolitan region in 2011 — to a national scale, using established relationships among regional planning councils and their member local governments. This was accomplished through a best management practices (BMPs) implementation framework, which provided the means for substantive technology/knowledge transfer to have the expected impacts of soft cost reductions. Solar Ready II is a partnership of the Mid-America Regional Council (MARC), National Association of Regional Councils (NARC), Meister Consultants Group (MCG), Council of State Governments (CSG) and nine regional councils that have engaged 277 local governments, containing nearly 23 million residents across thirteen states and the District of Columbia. National Partners Roles and Responsibilities Mid-America Regional Council Lead agency National Association of Regional National coordination, monitoring, oversight, reporting Councils (NARC) and communications and outreach. Meister Consultants Group (MCG) Subject matter expert, research, technical assistance, content development, education and training. Council of State Governments (CSG) Connection to state elected and appointed offi cials, dissemination of communications, education and outreach. | page 3 Solar Ready II | Final Report Participating Regional Planning Councils (RPCs) Participating RPC Partners Number of Population Solar Ready II - Best Management Participating of Engaged Practices (BMPs) Jurisdictions Jurisdictions Central New York Regional 51 411,760 • Solarize, community solar. Planning and Development • Financing, lending, PACE. Board (CNYRPDB) • Streamline permit process, checklist. Delaware Valley Regional 35 2,230,719 • Solarize. Planning Commission • Solar Ready guidelines. (DVRPC) / Delaware County • Zoning/model ordinances. Planning Department • Streamline permit process, checklist. Metropolitan Washington 15 4,220,401 • Solarize. Council of Governments • Central information source. (MWCOG) - DC • Streamline permit process, checklist. Maricopa Association of 19 3,596,661 • Solar Ready Guidelines. Governments (MAG) • Financing, lending, PACE. • Streamline permit process, checklist. Mid-America Regional 26 1,439,225 • Solar Ready guidelines. Council (MARC) • Zoning/model ordinances. • Streamline permit process, checklist. North Central Texas Council 33 4,646,743 • Central information source. of Governments (NCTCOG) • Zoning/model ordinances. • Pre-qualify plans. • Streamline permit process, checklist. Northwestern Indiana 19 515,384 • Solarize. Regional Planning Council • Zoning/model ordinance. (NIRPC) • Pre-qualify plans. Ohio Kentucky Indiana 45 1,900,330 • Solar Ready guidelines. Regional Council of • Central information source. Governments (OKI) • Financing, lending, PACE. Southwest Florida Regional 23 1,619,827 • Solar Ready guidelines. Planning Council (SWFRPC) • Zoning/model ordinances. • Streamline permit process, checklist. Tampa Bay Regional 11 2,409,685 • Solar Ready guidelines. Planning Council (TBRPC) • Central information source. • Financing, lending, PACE. TOTAL 277 22,990,735 page 4 | Solar Ready II | Final Report Anticipated impacts The key goal of SRII was to reduce soft costs associated with local government processes and customer acquisition through the implementation of streamlined permitting, proper planning and zoning, Solarize campaigns and other financing options in the ten participating regions.The BMPs provided the framework to streamline both permitting and planning processes, and promote financing options.The expected impacts of the SRII initiative included: Residential/Commercial Siting, Planning and Zoning Financing Permitting Processes • Reduced permitting • Permissive Solar Rights and • Access to PACE. IMPACTS application time. Access. • Implementation of • Easy access to permitting • Allowance of solar in zoning Solarize campaigns. applications. codes. • Availability of local • Easy access to processing • Availability of new construction and diverse lending information. guidelines that lower labor options and access to • Reduced permitting costs. capital. processing time. • Integration and incorporation of • Reasonable permitting fees. solar into long-term community planning. • Coordination of inspection and reduced waiting times. Outcomes Coverage Results templates, checklists and guides, along with other educational materials for solar energy. • National scale expansion involving 10 regions in 13 states and the District of Columbia. • SRII partner websites and web pages received more than 55,740 views. In addition to websites, • RPCs’ efforts targeted close to 23 million five educational videos were produced with 1,445 population. views. The SRII • 277 local governments actively engaged, receiving team published SRII resources. 23,566 Facebook posts and 621 Communications Education tweets. It is estimated that SRII and Outreach Results information released • One central website created and maintained to the public was with periodic updates. Specifics include: online picked up and re- newsletters, press releases and direct e-blasts disseminated to over reached 155,018 individuals; print newsletters were 759,290 individuals distributed to 16,110 individuals; online resources by local media. were disseminated to over 33,170 individuals and Lastly, regional print resources were provided to 4,786 individuals. partners gave 27 Frederick County Solar Co-op These resources included best management practice interviews to local participants. Photo courtesy of radio and TV Sandra Thomas. stations. | page 5 Solar Ready II | Final Report Strategies — Results Soft Cost Reduction Estimates • 15 best management practices (BMPs) codified • Reduced time for permit applications and and utilized as framework for local government submittals. implementation. • Increased access to checklists and guidelines, • 408 events (meetings, training workshops) held resulting in estimated time savings. with 12,600 participants. In addition, 34 webinars were held, which convened 844 individuals. • Reduced wait times for inspections. • 18,600 state elected and appointed officials • Below average cost of permitting fees. received solar resource materials through magazine • 20 percent documented savings from Solarize articles, email communications, webinars and a programs. one-day, in-person workshop at CSG National annual conference. Market Transformation • Market research public engagement initiative • 66 percent increase of installed residential capacity in KC metro region that connected with 22,247 over grant period. stakeholders, conducting two solar-related surveys (42 percent return rate of 1,051 participants) and • Total cost is now estimated at $3.50/W for one discussion forum. residential and $2/W for commercial. • 12 successful Conclusion Solarize campaigns in five regions Benefits of a Regional Approach that resulted in SRII provides insight into the value of a regional over 4.91 MW of approach to solar and the powerful roles that RPCs installed capacity, can play in reaching and supporting a large number 4,405 staff hours, of local governments. The most important function 183 public events, of an RPC is to foster communication, coordination 4,665 interested and collaboration among and across their member solar customers, DVPRC’s Solarize Greater Media jurisdictions in a politically neutral setting. Because 626 individual Lawn sign. RPCs are aware of the specific needs, challenges, or installations. other special considerations of member jurisdictions, • Regional Solar Ready Communities recognition they are uniquely suited to provide customized tools or program development and implemented in KC technical assistance. RPCs are natural conveners and metro region. 12 jurisdictions received awards
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Boulder Solar Power JUN 3 2016 MBR App.Pdf
    20160603-5296 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 6/3/2016 12:51:20 PM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION Boulder Solar Power, LLC ) Docket No. ER16-_____-000 APPLICATION FOR MARKET-BASED RATE AUTHORIZATION, REQUEST FOR DETERMINATION OF CATEGORY 1 SELLER STATUS, REQUEST FOR WAIVERS AND BLANKET AUTHORIZATIONS, AND REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF PRIOR NOTICE REQUIREMENT Pursuant to Section 205 of the Federal Power Act (“FPA”),1 Section 35.12 of the regulations of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or the “Commission”),2 Rules 204 and 205 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure,3 and FERC Order Nos. 697, et al.4 and Order No. 816,5 Boulder Solar Power, LLC (“Applicant”) hereby requests that the Commission: (1) accept Applicant’s proposed baseline market-based rate tariff (“MBR Tariff”) for filing; (2) authorize Applicant to sell electric energy, capacity, and certain ancillary services at market-based rates; (3) designate Applicant as a Category 1 Seller in all regions; and (4) grant Applicant such waivers and blanket authorizations as the Commission has granted to other sellers with market-based rate authorization. Applicant requests that the Commission waive its 60-day prior notice requirement6 to allow Applicant’s MBR Tariff to become effective as of July 1, 2016. In support of this Application, Applicant states as follows: 1 16 U.S.C. § 824d (2012). 2 18 C.F.R. § 35.12 (2016). 3 Id. §§ 385.204 and 385.205. 4 Mkt.-Based Rates for Wholesale Sales of Elec. Energy, Capacity & Ancillary Servs. by Pub. Utils., Order No.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Fighter Safety and Emergency Response for Solar Power Systems
    Fire Fighter Safety and Emergency Response for Solar Power Systems Final Report A DHS/Assistance to Firefighter Grants (AFG) Funded Study Prepared by: Casey C. Grant, P.E. Fire Protection Research Foundation The Fire Protection Research Foundation One Batterymarch Park Quincy, MA, USA 02169-7471 Email: [email protected] http://www.nfpa.org/foundation © Copyright Fire Protection Research Foundation May 2010 Revised: October, 2013 (This page left intentionally blank) FOREWORD Today's emergency responders face unexpected challenges as new uses of alternative energy increase. These renewable power sources save on the use of conventional fuels such as petroleum and other fossil fuels, but they also introduce unfamiliar hazards that require new fire fighting strategies and procedures. Among these alternative energy uses are buildings equipped with solar power systems, which can present a variety of significant hazards should a fire occur. This study focuses on structural fire fighting in buildings and structures involving solar power systems utilizing solar panels that generate thermal and/or electrical energy, with a particular focus on solar photovoltaic panels used for electric power generation. The safety of fire fighters and other emergency first responder personnel depends on understanding and properly handling these hazards through adequate training and preparation. The goal of this project has been to assemble and widely disseminate core principle and best practice information for fire fighters, fire ground incident commanders, and other emergency first responders to assist in their decision making process at emergencies involving solar power systems on buildings. Methods used include collecting information and data from a wide range of credible sources, along with a one-day workshop of applicable subject matter experts that have provided their review and evaluation on the topic.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives
    Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives DONALD VIAL CENTER ON EMPLOYMENT IN THE GREEN ECONOMY Institute for Research on Labor and Employment University of California, Berkeley November 10, 2014 By Peter Philips, Ph.D. Professor of Economics, University of Utah Visiting Scholar, University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Peter Philips | Donald Vial Center on Employment in the Green Economy | November 2014 1 2 Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California: Quality Careers—Cleaner Lives Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives DONALD VIAL CENTER ON EMPLOYMENT IN THE GREEN ECONOMY Institute for Research on Labor and Employment University of California, Berkeley November 10, 2014 By Peter Philips, Ph.D. Professor of Economics, University of Utah Visiting Scholar, University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Peter Philips | Donald Vial Center on Employment in the Green Economy | November 2014 3 About the Author Peter Philips (B.A. Pomona College, M.A., Ph.D. Stanford University) is a Professor of Economics and former Chair of the Economics Department at the University of Utah. Philips is a leading economic expert on the U.S. construction labor market. He has published widely on the topic and has testified as an expert in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, served as an expert for the U.S. Justice Department in litigation concerning the Davis-Bacon Act (the federal prevailing wage law), and presented testimony to state legislative committees in Ohio, Indiana, Kansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Utah, Kentucky, Connecticut, and California regarding the regulations of construction labor markets.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 ANNUAL REPORT Table of CONTENTS EDITOR’S COMMENTS
    2020 ANNUAL REPORT table of CONTENTS EDITOR’S COMMENTS ...................................................................................................... 3 ENERGY SITES OF NORTH DAKOTA ................................................................................... 4 A VIEW FROM ABOVE ....................................................................................................... 4 NORTH DAKOTA GENERATION .......................................................................................... 5 GENERATION ................................................................................................................... 6 Mining ..................................................................................................................... 6 Reclamation ............................................................................................................. 7 Coal-Based ................................................................................................................. 8 Peaking Plants ............................................................................................................. 9 Wind .........................................................................................................................10 Hydroelectric ..............................................................................................................14 Geothermal ................................................................................................................15 Solar .........................................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • US Solar Industry Year in Review 2009
    US Solar Industry Year in Review 2009 Thursday, April 15, 2010 575 7th Street NW Suite 400 Washington DC 20004 | www.seia.org Executive Summary U.S. Cumulative Solar Capacity Growth Despite the Great Recession of 2009, the U.S. solar energy 2,500 25,000 23,835 industry grew— both in new installations and 2,000 20,000 employment. Total U.S. solar electric capacity from 15,870 2,108 photovoltaic (PV) and concentrating solar power (CSP) 1,500 15,000 technologies climbed past 2,000 MW, enough to serve -th MW more than 350,000 homes. Total U.S. solar thermal 1,000 10,000 MW 1 capacity approached 24,000 MWth. Solar industry 494 revenues also surged despite the economy, climbing 500 5,000 36 percent in 2009. - - A doubling in size of the residential PV market and three new CSP plants helped lift the U.S. solar electric market 37 percent in annual installations over 2008 from 351 MW in 2008 to 481 MW in 2009. Solar water heating (SWH) Electricity Capacity (MW) Thermal Capacity (MW-Th) installations managed 10 percent year-over-year growth, while the solar pool heating (SPH) market suffered along Annual U.S. Solar Energy Capacity Growth with the broader construction industry, dropping 10 1,200 1,099 percent. 1,036 1,000 918 894 928 Another sign of continued optimism in solar energy: 865 -th 725 758 742 venture capitalists invested more in solar technologies than 800 542 any other clean technology in 2009. In total, $1.4 billion in 600 481 2 351 venture capital flowed to solar companies in 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Springs Solar Project Draft Environmental Assessment Pennington County, South Dakota
    Wild Springs Solar Project Draft Environmental Assessment Pennington County, South Dakota DOE/EA-2068 April 2021 Table of Contents Introduction and Background ................................................................................... 1 Purpose and Need for WAPA’s Federal Action ...................................................................... 1 Wild Springs Solar’s Purpose and Need .................................................................................. 1 Proposed Action and Alternatives ............................................................................ 2 No Action Alternative .............................................................................................................. 2 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Further Study .................................................. 2 Proposed Action ....................................................................................................................... 2 Solar Panels and Racking ................................................................................................3 Electrical Collection System ...........................................................................................4 Inverter/Transformer Skids .............................................................................................4 Access Roads ..................................................................................................................5 Fencing & Cameras .........................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • CEEC 100% Renewable Energy White Paper
    CONCORD CITY COUNCIL CONCORD ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE ADVISORY REPORT IN SUPPORT OF THE GOAL OF 100% RENEWABLE ENERGY FOR CONCORD January 31, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................... iii PART 1 - INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 PART 2 – CONCORD’S ENERGY PRESENT ................................................................................................... 2 A. Current Community-Wide Energy Consumption ............................................................................... 2 B. Current Municipal Government Energy Consumption ..................................................................... 2 C. Existing Non-Fossil Fueled Energy Generation in Concord ........................................................... 2 D. Concord's Recent Energy-Related Initiatives ....................................................................................... 3 PART 3 -- THE THREAT OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE RENEWABLE ENERGY SOLUTION ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4 A. Global and National Impacts ..................................................................................................................... 4 B. State and Local Impacts .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Standards and Requirements for Solar Equipment, Installation, and Licensing and Certification a Guide for States and Municipalities
    SUSTAINABLE SOLAR EDUCATION PROJECT Beren Argetsinger, Keyes&FoxLLP•BenjaminInskeep,EQResearchLLC Beren Argetsinger, A GuideforStatesandMunicipalities and LicensingCertification for SolarEquipment,Installation, Standards andRequirements FEBRU A RY 2017 RY © B igstock/ilfede SUSTAINABLE SOLAR EDUCATION PROJECT ABOUT THIS GUIDE AND THE SUSTAINABLE SOLAR EDUCATION PROJECT Standards and Requirements for Solar Equipment, Installation, and Licensing and Certification: A Guide for States and Municipalities is one of six program guides being produced by the Clean Energy States Alliance (CESA) as part of its Sustainable Solar Ed- ucation Project. The project aims to provide information and educational resources to help states and municipalities ensure that distributed solar electricity remains consumer friendly and its benefits are accessible to low- and moderate-income households. In ad- dition to publishing guides, the Sustainable Solar Education Project will produce webinars, an online course, a monthly newsletter, and in-person training on topics related to strengthening solar accessibility and affordability, improving consumer information, and implementing consumer protection measures regarding solar photovoltaic (PV) systems. More information about the project, including a link to sign up to receive notices about the project’s activities, can be found at www.cesa.org/projects/sustainable-solar. ABOUT THE U.S. DEpaRTMENT OF ENERGY SUNSHOT INITIATIVE The U.S. Department of Energy SunShot Initiative is a collaborative national effort that aggressively drives innovation to make solar energy fully cost-competitive with traditional energy sources before the end of the decade. Through SunShot, the Energy Department supports efforts by private companies, universities, and national laboratories to drive down the cost of solar electricity to $0.06 per kilowatt-hour.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Integrated Resource Plan
    PUBLIC VERSION | CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION EXCISED 2015 INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN S e 0 p 9 t 6 e 5- m -1 be P r /R 1, 15 201 E0 5 | Docket No. Printed on 100% recycled paper. Lori Hoyum Policy Manager 218-355-3601 [email protected] September 1, 2015 VIA E-FILING Daniel P. Wolf Executive Secretary Minnesota Public Utilities Commission 121 7th Place East, Suite 350 St. Paul, MN 55101-2147 Re: In the Matter of Minnesota Power’s Application for Approval of its 2015-2029 Resource Plan Docket No. E015/RP-15-690 Dear Mr. Wolf: Minnesota Power presents for approval its 2015 Integrated Resource Plan (“2015 Plan” or “Plan”) pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission’s (“Commission”) Order dated November 12, 2013, in Docket No. E015/RP-13-53. This Plan is being filed under Minn. Stat. § 216B.2422 and Minn. Rules Chapter 7843. Minnesota Power’s 2015 Plan is the next chapter in the Company’s EnergyForward resource strategy. Minnesota Power’s EnergyForward strategy is reshaping the Company’s power supply from a predominantly coal-based energy mix to one that is more diverse, while maintaining low cost, reliable electricity to customers. The Plan is designed to supply Minnesota Power customers with a safe, reliable, and affordable power supply while improving environmental performance, reducing emissions, sustaining the Company’s high-quality energy conservation program and adding renewables in the near-term and natural gas in the long-term. Minnesota Power’s short-term action plan during the five-year period of 2015 through 2019 is comprised of steps that will: a) preserve competitive base load generating resources while reducing emissions, b) increase implementation of least-cost demand-side resources including conservation, c) reduce reliance on coal-fired generation, and d) add renewable energy and transmission infrastructure to the benefit of customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Powering Indiana's Economic Future November 2020 Powering Indiana’S Economic Future
    POWERING INDIANA'S ECONOMIC FUTURE NOVEMBER 2020 POWERING INDIANA’S ECONOMIC FUTURE This study was made possible through these supporting organizations and the work of the Advisory Council, co-chaired by Ron Christian and Tom Easterday. We thank them for their efforts: Champion: Advisory Council* Kari Fluegel, Alcoa Corporation Evan Midler, Alliance Resource Partners Cyril Martinand, ArcelorMittal Susan Zlajic, ArcleorMittal Wendell Carter, ArcelorMittal Mike Crossey, CountryMark Stan Pinegar, Duke Energy Gold: Amy Kurt, EDP Renewables Scott Glaze, Fort Wayne Metals Jean Neel, Haynes International, Inc. Matt Prine, Indiana American Water John Gasstrom, Indiana Electric Cooperatives Danielle McGrath, Indiana Energy Association Brian Bergsma, Indiana Michigan Power Joe Rompala, INDIEC Silver: Nick Heiny, Metal Technologies, Inc. Alliance Resource Partners Melissa Seymour, MISO ArcelorMittal Brandon Seitz, NIPSCO CountryMark Tom Easterday, North American Subaru, Inc. Fort Wayne Metals Sam Schlosser, Plymouth Foundry Haynes International Ron Christian, Retired-Vectren Indiana American Water Rachel Hazaray, Subaru of Indiana Automotive, Inc. Indiana Electric Cooperatives Jamalyn Sarver, Sunrise Coal Indiana Energy Association Mike Roeder, Vectren, A CenterPoint Energy Company INDIEC (Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers) Steve Chriss, Walmart Inc. Metal Technologies Kevin Thompson, Walmart Inc. NIPSCO Subaru of Indiana Automotive *The Indiana Chamber of Commerce Foundation commissioned Sunrise Coal London Economics International LLC (LEI) to
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Homes: the Next Step for Clean Energy
    Solar Homes The Next Step for Clean Energy Solar Homes The Next Step for Clean Energy Written by: Abigail Bradford and Jonathan Sundby Frontier Group Bret Fanshaw and Rob Sargent Environment America Research & Policy Center December 2018 Acknowledgments Environment America Research & Policy Center thanks Jennifer Amann of the American Council for an Energy- Efficient Economy (ACEEE), Justin Baca and Maria Kanevsky of Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), John Rogers of the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), Madhur Boloor of Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Susannah Churchill of Vote Solar, and Kelly Knutsen of the California Solar and Storage Association (CALSSA) for their review of drafts of this document, as well as their insights and suggestions. Thanks also to Tony Dutzik, Susan Rakov and Elizabeth Ridlington of Frontier Group for editorial support. Environment America Research & Policy Center thanks The Scherman Foundation, The John Merck Fund, Energy Foundation, The Fund for New Jersey, The Bullitt Foundation and The Cynthia and George Mitchell Foundation for making this report possible. The authors bear responsibility for any factual errors. The recommendations are those of Environment America Research & Policy Center. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of our funders or those who provided review. 2018 Environment America Research & Policy Center. Some Rights Reserved. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 3.0 Unported License. To view the terms of this license, visit creativecommons.org/licenses/by-no-nd/3.0. Environment America Research & Policy Center is a 501(c)(3) organization.
    [Show full text]
  • SREC) Markets: Status and Trends
    Solar Renewable Energy Certificate (SREC) Markets: Status and Trends Lori Bird, Jenny Heeter, and Claire Kreycik NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Technical Report NREL/TP-6A20-52868 November 2011 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Solar Renewable Energy Certificate (SREC) Markets: Status and Trends Lori Bird, Jenny Heeter, and Claire Kreycik Prepared under Task No. SM10.2464 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 1617 Cole Boulevard NREL/TP-6A20-52868 Golden, Colorado 80401 November 2011 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]