Arson Detection for the First Responder/Student Manual
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Juvenile Firesetting
JUVENILE FIRESETTING KEY POINTS OVERVIEW • Children set fires for a wide variety of reasons. When juvenile delinquency is mentioned, arson is not • Pyromania is an extremely rare disorder usually the first type of offense that comes to mind. and is not usually the cause of juvenile However, between 2007 and 2011, the National Fire firesetting. Protection Association (NFPA) reported that 282,600 • intentional fires were reported to U.S. fire Children who deliberately set fires should be evaluated by a therapist or other departments each year, and 40 percent of individuals professional. arrested for these events were less than 18 years of age. Even more disturbing is that almost 85 percent of • Fire safety education and cognitive the victims of fires started by children are the children behavioral therapy are common treatments. themselves, with 80 deaths and 860 injuries occurring annually. Although legal definitions of arson vary from state to state, a juvenile may be charged with arson when an evaluation of the event reveals sufficient evidence of malicious and willful firesetting. Families can prevent firesetting by following a few rules, such as the following from the U.S. Fire Administration: 1. Teach children that matches and lighters are not toys. 2. Never allow children to play with lighters or matches. About half of fires started by children are caused by children playing with matches and lighters. 3. Keep all matches and lighters out of the reach of children. Store in a high cabinet, preferably locked. 4. Do not leave young children unattended. 5. Teach young children to tell a grown-up when they see matches or lighters. -
In Custody List **Total Inmates Does Not Include ICE Detainees **Current As Of: Total Inmates: 28 November 09, 2020 6:48 Am
Freeborn Co Adult Detenton Center In Custody List **Total Inmates does not include ICE Detainees **Current as of: Total Inmates: 28 November 09, 2020 6:48 am Ashley, Nicholas Ryan Charge(s) Burglary-3rd Deg-Steal/Commit Felony or Gross Misd Intake Date: October 15, 2020 Intake Time: 1:05 pm Ba, La Charge(s) Drugs - 5th Degree - Possess Schedule 1,2,3,4 - Not Small Amount Marijuana Domestic Abuse - Violate Order for Intake Date: November 01, 2020 Protection Intake Time: 12:21 am Boots-Ringoen, Dominik Nikko Charge(s) Criminal Vehicular Homicide - Operate Vehicle with Negligence - Under Influence Alcohol Intake Date: August 27, 2020 Traffic - DWI - Operate Motor Vehicle - Alcohol Concentration 0.08 Within 2 Intake Time: 10:31 pm Hours Disorderly Conduct-Brawling or Fighting Criminal Vehicular Operation - Great Bodily Harm - Gross Negligence Traffic-Drivers License-Driving After Revocation Traffic - Underage drinking and driving; Crime described Burt, Adam Robert Charge(s) Assault-3rd Degree-Substantial Bodily Harm Traffic - DWI - First-Degree DWI;w/in Intake Date: February 14, 2020 10 yrs of 3 or more qualified prior impaired driving incidents Intake Time: 4:43 pm Page 1 of 6 Everet, Michael Leonard Charge(s) Harassment; Restraining Order - Violate and knows of temporary or restraining order Intake Date: November 06, 2020 Intake Time: 5:53 pm Fishel, Adam Dwayne Charge(s) Fleeing a Peace Officer in a Motor Vehicle Traffic - DWI - Operate Motor Vehicle - Intake Date: November 01, 2020 Alcohol Concentration 0.08 Within 2 Hours Intake Time: -
April 5, 2021
APRIL 5, 2021 APRIL 5, 2021 Tab le o f Contents 4 #1 Songs THIS week 5 powers 7 action / recurrents 9 hotzone / developiong 10 pro-file 12 video streaming 13 Top 40 callout 14 Hot ac callout 15 future tracks 16 INTELESCOPE 17 intelevision 18 methodology 19 the back page Songs this week #1 BY MMI COMPOSITE CATEGORIES 4.5.21 ai r p lay OLIVIA RODRIGO “drivers license” retenTion THE WEEKND “Save Your Tears” callout OLIVIA RODRIGO “drivers license” audio DRAKE “What’s Next” VIDEO CARDI B “Up” SALES BRUNO MARS/A. PAAK/SILK SONIC “Leave The Door Open” COMPOSITE OLIVIA RODRIGO “drivers license” Your weekly REsource for music research MondayMorningIntel.com CLICK HERE to E-MAIL Monday Morning Intel with your thoughts, suggestions, or ideas. mmi-powers 4.5.21 Weighted Airplay, Retention Scores, Streaming Scores, and Sales Scores this week combined and equally weighted deviser Powers Rankers. TW RK TW RK TW RK TW RK TW RK TW RK TW COMP AIRPLAY RETENTION CALLOUT AUDIO VIDEO SALES RANK ARTIST TITLE LABEL 1 10 2 10 10 8 1 OLIVIA RODRIGO drivers license Geffen/Interscope 7 1 15 12 13 10 2 THE WEEKND Save Your Tears XO/Republic 23 x 21 1 6 2 3 JUSTIN BIEBER Peaches f/Daniel Caesar/Giveon Def Jam 10 2 3 16 23 18 4 24KGOLDN Mood f/Iann Dior RECORDS/Columbia 15 x 35 5 4 3 5 BRUNO MARS/A .PAAK/SILK SONIC Leave The Door Open Aftermath Ent./Atlantic 2 9 8 34 20 13 6 BILLIE EILISH Therefore I Am Darkroom/Interscope 6 6 10 31 25 11 7 TATE MCRAE You Broke Me First RCA 4 7 7 21 17 37 8 ARIANA GRANDE 34+35 Republic 21 16 11 20 15 7 9 SAWEETIE Best Friend f/Doja -
Fire and Arson Scene Evidence: a Guide for Public Safety Personnel
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice FireFire andand ArsonArson SceneScene Evidence:Evidence: A Guide for Public Safety Personnel Research Report U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs 810 Seventh Street N.W. Washington, DC 20531 Janet Reno Attorney General Daniel Marcus Acting Associate Attorney General Mary Lou Leary Acting Assistant Attorney General Julie E. Samuels Acting Director, National Institute of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice World Wide Web Site World Wide Web Site http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij Fire and Arson Scene Evidence: A Guide for Public Safety Personnel Written and Approved by the Technical Working Group on Fire/Arson Scene Investigation June 2000 NCJ 181584 Julie E. Samuels Acting Director David G. Boyd, Ph.D. Deputy Director Richard M. Rau, Ph.D. Project Monitor Opinions or points of view expressed in this document represent a consensus of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Justice. The National Institute of Justice is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice Assistance, the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office for Victims of Crime. Message From the Attorney General ctions taken at the outset of an investigation at a fire and Aarson scene can play a pivotal role in the resolution of a case. Careful, thorough investigation is key to ensuring that potential physical evidence is not tainted or destroyed or potential witnesses overlooked. -
FIGHT FIRE with FACTS Speak with a USFA Spokesperson, Please Call 202-842-3600
FIGHT FIRE WITH FACTS More than 4,000 Americans die each year in fires and approximately 20,000 are injured. Many of them might be alive today if they had only had the information they needed to avoid a disaster. The U.S Fire Administration offers the following life-saving tips that could make a big difference for you and your community. Following these simple fire safety tips can increase survival rates dramatically. Did you know? ALTERNATIVE HEATER SAFETY LIFE-SAVING TIPS Eighty-two percent of all fire ¾ For increased protection, USFA recommends installing deaths occur in the home. both ionization (detects fast-burning fires) and photoelectric Heating is the second leading (detects slow, smoldering fires), or dual sensor smoke alarms cause of residential fires. in the home per manufacturers’ installation instructions and Deaths due to fires caused by applicable codes. Install smoke alarms in each bedroom. heating a home are particularly ¾ Kerosene heaters are not permitted in many areas. If you preventable. use a kerosene heater, use only the recommended fuel. Always Having a working smoke alarm refuel outdoors safely away from your home. reduces one’s chances of dying in ¾ Allow your heater to cool before refueling and only refuel a fire by nearly a half. outdoors. For more information on how you can help prevent fires and fire ¾ Keep the fire in the fireplace by making sure you have a screen large enough to catch flying sparks and rolling logs. deaths, please contact your local fire department on a non- ¾ Clean your chimney regularly – chimney tar build-up can emergency number or the U.S. -
Forensic Analysis of Fire Debris Residues
INDIANAPOLIS-MARION COUNTY FORENSIC SERVICES AGENCY Doctor Dennis J. Nicholas Institute of Forensic Science 40 SOUTH ALABAMA STREET INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46204 PHONE (317) 327-3670 FAX (317) 327-3607 EVIDENCE SUBMISSION GUIDELINE #4 FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF FIRE DEBRIS RESIDUES INTRODUCTION A fire investigation is an unenviable task. The devastation, charred debris, collapsed structures, water soaked ashes, together with the smoke and stench, makes the task uninviting and seemingly impossible. The basic role of an investigator at a fire scene is twofold: firstly to determine the origin of the fire (the site where the fire began), and secondly to examine closely the site of origin to try and determine what it was that caused a fire to start at or around that location. An examination would typically begin by trying to gain an overall impression of the site and the fire damage; this could be done at ground level or from an elevated position. From this, one might proceed to an examination of the materials present, the fuel load, and the state of the debris at various places. Fire debris is a general term used to define the materials collected from a fire scene for laboratory examination. When a fire investigator suspects that a fire might have been deliberately set using accelerants such as ignitable liquids, it is possible to collect and analyze fire debris to see if such products are present. Combustion requires three elements — heat, oxygen, and fuel. Fire will be extinguished when any one of these three elements is absent. Fire does not burn solids or liquids (in general), but rather the gases formed above them. -
THE CRIME of ARSON Paul Sadler, Jr
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 41 | Issue 3 Article 4 1950 The rC ime of Arson Paul Jr. Sadler Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Paul Jr. Sadler, The rC ime of Arson, 41 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 290 (1950-1951) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. THE CRIME OF ARSON Paul Sadler, Jr. The following article is from a thesis the author prepared while pursuing his studies in Social Relations at Harvard University, from which he received his A.B. degree in June, -1950. Mr. Sadler is currently employed as a fire investigator adjuster for the General Adjustment Bureau, Inc., Boston, Mass.-EDrroR. I The crime of arson is an extraordinarily complex one by its definition alone. Its complexity makes many difficulties to the student. It also gives the perpetrator some advantages. To begin with, arson, like murder and most admirality crimes, exists in several degrees of indict- ment. These degrees are wholly dependent upon the type and use of the structure or property burned, degree of involvement of participants, and often the time of day in which the crime is committed.' But what degrees now exist are only created by modern statutory defini- tion over and above the original common law of England, which law, in comparison with 20th century statutes, seems very defective in scope. -
Residues of Fire Accelerant Chemicals Volume I: Risk
RESIDUES OF FIRE ACCELERANT CHEMICALS VOLUME I: RISK ASSESSMENT Prepared for: Intermountain Region USDA Forest Service Ogden, UT By: Headquarters: 8000 Westpark Drive, Suite 400 McLean, VA 22102 October 16, 2002 Abstract This report summarizes the results of quantitative human health and ecological risk assessments of chemical residues in the environment from the use of a variety of accelerants to ignite prescribed burns. On a per-unit basis for each ignition method, no risks were identified for human health, nor for general wildlife species. However, consideration should be given at the planning stage to protecting sensitive aquatic species in small watersheds that have limited potential for diluting residue chemicals that may run off or erode to surface water. Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction.............................................................................................................................1 1.1 Background: Fire Accelerants.....................................................................................1 1.2 Identification of Accelerant Residues ..........................................................................2 1.3 Overview of the Human Health Risk Assessment .......................................................4 1.4 Overview of the Ecological Risk Assessment..............................................................4 2.0 Human Health Hazard Assessment.........................................................................................6 2.1 Background Information ..............................................................................................6 -
Laboratory Safety for Chemistry Students
LABORATORY SAFETY FOR CHEMISTRY STUDENTS ROBERT H. HILL, JR. DAVID C. FINSTER A JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., PUBLICATION LABORATORY SAFETY FOR CHEMISTRY STUDENTS LABORATORY SAFETY FOR CHEMISTRY STUDENTS ROBERT H. HILL, JR. DAVID C. FINSTER A JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., PUBLICATION Copyright 2010 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey Published simultaneously in Canada No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 750-4470, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permission. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. -
An Environmental and Behavioural Analysis of Arson in a Danish Sample
An Environmental and Behavioural Analysis of Arson in a Danish Sample Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Liverpool for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Charlotte Kappel. July, 2018 i Table of Contents Page Number List of Tables ii List of Appendices ii Abstract 1 Acknowledgements 4 Part 1: Literature Review and Background Chapter One – The Problem of Arson 6 1.1. Introduction: The Problem of Arson 6 1.2. 7 Definition 1.2.1. Fire-setting and Arson 7 1.2.2. Pyromania 8 1.3. Is Arson on the 10 Increase? 1.3.1. Detection and Conviction Rates 11 1.4. Conclusion 13 ii Chapter Two - Previous Research and Theory on Arson 15 2.1. Introduction 15 2.2. Theoretical Approaches 16 2.3. Motivational Aspects of Arson 22 2.4. Demographic and Biographical Characteristics of Arsonists 23 2.4.1. Gender 23 2.4.2. Age 26 2.4.3. Family, Marital, Educational and Occupational 27 Background 2.4.4. Ethnicity 29 2.4.5. Psychiatric History 30 2.4.6. Solo Offending versus Co-offending 31 2.4.7. Serial versus Single Offenders 32 2.5. Geographic Profiling 34 2.5.1. Geographic Profiling: Basic Concepts 34 2.5.2. Journey to the Scene of the Crime 35 2.5.3. Geographic Profiling: Problems and Issues 37 2.6. Conclusion: Investigating Arson from a New Angle 38 Chapter Three - Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design and 41 Defensible Space Theory: Towards a New Approach 3.1. Introduction: An Environmental Approach 41 3.2. -
Out with the Grungy, Socialism-Preaching City Park
volume 12 - issue 4 - tuesday, september 24, 2012 - uvm, burlington, vt uvm.edu/~watertwr - thewatertower.tumblr.com by rebeccalaurion Quick confession before we begin: I’m not a huge gamer. However, 90 percent of my friends are, and my earliest memory of my father is watching him play Final Fan- tasy. So even though I wasn’t one of the people who spent my weekend download- ing Borderlands 2 or Torchlight 2, I can still deeply appreciate what game culture has done for me. I’ve met some of my best friends through Meta-Gaming Club, and, even though I consider myself a huge geek, just in diff erent ways, gaming wasn’t exact- ly on my radar until college. As such, I’ve learned quite a bit about the world of gaming, whether I have enjoyed it or not. For one thing, a ‘gamer’ doesn’t necessarily mean an acne-ridden virgin draped in wizard robes in their mother’s basement. Th ough, that’s not to say that never happens anymore. A gamer can be anyone from someone religiously playing Angry Birds on their phone or any devoted fan waiting outside Game Stop during all hours of the night for the newest consoles ben berrick or Halo installments. by phoebefooks and patrickmurphy As a whole, I think we can all agree that stereotypes are stupid as hell. And with Vermont, and Burlington specifi cally, the primary target of the Dobrá Tea protes- es-too long-menu is a so-called “waste of gamers, there are plenty of them: they’re is known for its politically active and of- tors. -
Physical Science
Cedar Grove School District Cedar Grove, NJ 2019 Grade 9 Physical Science Revisions Approved by the Cedar Grove Board of Education October 2019 Superintendent of Schools Mr. Michael J. Fetherman Board of Education Mrs. Christine Dye, President Mr. David Schoner, Vice-President Mrs. Nicole DiChiara Mrs. Michele Mega Mr. Leonard Splendoria Physical Science Course Description Within the New Jersey Student Learning Standards for Science there are three distinct and equally important dimensions to learning science. These dimensions are combined to form each standard—or performance expectation—and each dimension works with the other two to help students build a cohesive understanding of science over time. Crosscutting Concepts help students explore connections across the four domains of science, including Physical Science, Life Science, Earth and Space Science, and Engineering Design. When these concepts, such as “cause and effect”, are made explicit for students, they can help students develop a coherent and scientifically-based view of the world around them. Science and Engineering Practices describe what scientists do to investigate the natural world and what engineers do to design and build systems. The practices better explain and extend what is meant by “inquiry” in science and the range of cognitive, social, and physical practices that it requires. Students engage in practices to build, deepen, and apply their knowledge of core ideas and crosscutting concepts. Disciplinary Core Ideas are the key ideas in science that have broad importance within or across multiple science or engineering disciplines. These core ideas build on each other as students progress through grade levels and are grouped into the following four domains: Physical Science, Life Science, Earth and Space Science, and Engineering.