Excavations at Phylakopi in Melos, Conducted by The

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Excavations at Phylakopi in Melos, Conducted by The iM: :;^;s^ :!l>h. t:,S. '&. F>>?" it:, (:';;' i!,;''^- MM^j'Vt''"! "m Bt 'if;'-!Kl 'jc; im m^ '!:i^r;' ::X ,'.1' .v I,'. .' ;>>'iti;j Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2007 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/excavationsatphyOObrituoft .8^ EXCAVATIONS AT PHYLAKOPT IN JIELOS f THE SOCIETY FOR THE PROMOTION OF HELLENIC STUDIES ) SUPPLEMENTARY PAPER No. 4 EXCAVATIONS AT PHYLAKOPI IN MELOS CONDUCTED BY THE BRITISH SCHOOL AT ATHENS DESCRIBED BY T. D. ATKINSON, R. C. BOSANQUET, C. C. EIXiAR, A. J. EVANS, D. G. HOGARTH, D. MACKENZIE, C. SMITH, AND F. B. WELCH With 41 P/fi^es ami 193 I/liMlrcUlons in the Text PUBLISHED BY THE COUNCIL, AND SOLD ON THEIR BEHALF BY MACM ILLAN AND CO., Limited, ST. MARTIN'S STREET. LONDON, W.C. MDCCCCIV 22/ / Ri<;hard Clay and Soks, Limited, liRKAD STREET HILL, E.C., AND BL'NtJAY, srFFOLK. aKTRONlC VERSIOh* ^ AVAILABIE m f6qqoQlnQ p^u 260 & PRKFACE In accordance with a proposal of the Committee of the British School at Athens, the Council of the Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies, at a meeting held on Dec. 20, 1900, authorised the publication of a Supplementary Paper embodying the results of the_ Excavations at Phylakopi. For this purpose a special Editorial Committee was appointed, consisting of Messrs. R. C. Bosanquet, E. A. Gabdnkr, and G. F. IIn,L. The process of preparing for publication the masses of pottery and other objects brought from Melos to Athens has of necessity been a slow one. It was begun by Mr. C. C. Eduar in 1897, and has been carried on since 1899 by Mr. Bosanquet, with occasional help from Mr. F. B. Welch and other members of the British School. The majority of the drawings (excluding those in Chapter II. which are all by Mr. Atkinson) are the work of Mr. Halvor Bagge ; others, including the coloured copy of the Flying-fish picture, have been made by Mr. E. Cillieron, and a few by Mr. Theodore Fyfe. The difficulty of communication between contributors living in three and sometimes four difi"erent countries, may be held to excuse certain inconsistencies in nomenclature. No contributor is to be j-egarded as responsible for any statement not standing over his own .signature. "4 vi PREFACE The Editorial Committee desire to express their acknowledg- ments to Mr. P. Cavvadias, Ephor-General of Antiquities, and to Messrs. V. Staes and Ch. Tsountas, Ephors of the National Museum at Athens, who have done everything in their power to facilitate the preparation of this volume ; to Messrs. D. G. Hogarth and Cecil Smith, who, in addition to contributing the chapters signed by them, have in other ways rendered valuable assistance ; and also to Mr. Arthur Evans, who, though he took no part in the excav- ations, has contributed a note on the Pottery Marks in the light of the Cretan evidence. THE EDITORIAL COMMITTEE. Feb. 1904. / —— TABLK OF CONTENTS Introduction. By Cecil Smith CnAPTKR I. —TiiK Excavation. By D. G. Hogarth. §1 —Preliminary Soundings and the Wall of Fortification 5 8 2 —The South-Western Corner 10 § 3. —The North-Western Terrace 11 § 4. —The North Central Terrace U § 5. —The North-Eastern Terrace and the Palace 19 §6. —The other Regions 23 Chapter II. The Architecture. By T. D. Atkinson. § 1. —Introductory 25 § 2.—Relationship of the Buildings of the Three Periods 27 § 3.—The Site 29 § 4.—The Town Wall 30 § 5.—The First Period 35 § 6. —The Second Period 38 § 7.—The Third Period 50 Explanation of Plan of First and SeconifPeriocU 64 Explanation of Plan (>f 7'hird Period 66 Chapter III. The Wall-Paintinos. By R. C. Bosanquet. § 1.—The Frieze of the Flying-fish 70 § 2. —The Fragments of Larger Pictures 72 5^3.—The Design of White Lilies 76 § 4. —The Original Position and Age of these Pictures 76 § 5. —Other Remains of Wall-Paintings 77 ^ 6. —The Rosette Spiral 78 s5 7.—The Technique of the Melian Wall Paintings 79 ——— . CONTENTS. Chapter IV. The Pottery. By C. C. Edgar. § 1. —Introductory ... <. 80 S 2. —The Earliest Pottery 82 § 3. —Some otlier Early Wares 85 ^ i. —An Early Group of Dark-faced Vases 87 § 5. —Painted Ware of the Geometric Period : Introductory Matter 93 §6. —Vases with Geometric Designs in Lustrous Paint 96 §7. —Geometric Pottery with Designs in Matt Black 102 8. : 106 !;} —Pottery of the Mycenaean Period Introductory § 9. —Potteiy of the Early Mycenaean Style with Designs in Matt Black 108 5j 10. — Pottery of the Early Mycenaean Period with Designs in Black and Red 118 § 11.—The Fishermen Vase 123 § 12. —Pottery Decorated with Flowers in Black and Red 125 § 13. —The Later Local Pottery of the Mycenaean Period 129 * Jl} 14. —Baths or Washing Troughs and other similar Vessels ... 139 ^15. —Series of Flat BowlSi with Spouts >r. ... 143 • §16. — Imported Pottery of the Ordinary Mycenaean Type 145 §17. —Kamares Ware 148 § 18.—Odds and Ends 151 § 19. —The Chronological Relations of the preceding Fabrics to each other and to the various Settlements 159 § 20.—Conclusion 164 Explanation of fhe Plates 165 Chapter V. The Potteev Marks. A. —Occurrence of the Marks. By C. C. Edgar . 177 B. —Significance of the Marks. By A. J. Evans 181 Chapter VI. The Bronze Statuette. By Cecil Smith 186 Chapter VII. The Minor Antiquities. By R. C. BosANQUET and F. B. Welch ». 190 A. —The Minor Antiquities of Metal, Bone, Ivory and Stone. § 1. —Copper and Bronze 190 § 2. —Lead 192 § 3.—Bone 192 § 4. —Ivory 193 § 5.—Flint 194 § 6.—Marble 194 § 7. —Steatite 196 § 8. —Miscellaneous Objects of Stone 199 § 9.—Shells 201 —— . CONTENTS. IX PAUIt B. —The Minor Aiiti(|uitie8 of Clay. 1. 55 — Human Figures •J02 ij 2. —Animal Figures 203 §3. —Koats and otlicr Models 200 4. jlj — Lamps and other Domestic Utensils 201> 5. ilj —Spindle-whorls and Small Objects 213 Explanation of Ihn Plates 214 CiiAPTEK VIIT. —TiiK Obsidian Thadk. By li. C. Bosanqoet. § 1. —The Quarries 216 § 2.—The Obsidian "Workshop of the First City 218 3. {5 — IT-ses of (>l)si(lian : the Knife and Razor 221 4. 5} — Uses of Obsidian : the Arrowhead 222 5. § —Uses of Obsidian : the Threshing-sledge and Sickle 223 § 6. —The Finlay Collection and its Sources 224 §7. —The Copenhagen Collection 227 {} 8. —The Range and Duration of the Obsidian Ti'ade . 227 Chapter IX. Notes on the Tombs. By C. C. Eik;ar 234 Chaptek X. The Successive Settle.men'ts at Phvlakopi in their Aeoeo- Cretan Rel.\tioxs. By D. Mackenzie § 1 . — Introductory *. 238 § 2.-—The Earliest Beginnings of Settlement at Phylakopi 239 § 3.—The First City 243 § 4.—The Second City 254 § 5.—The Third City 263 Index 273 LIST OF PLATES I..—Plan showing Work of First and Second Periods. II. —Plan showing Work of Third Period. III. —The Flying-fish Fresco. IV-XXXVL—The Pottery. (For details, see pp. 165-176). XXXVII.—The Bronzfe Statuette. XXXVIII-XL.^—Miscellaneous Minor Antiquities. (For details, see pp. •214, 215). XLI.—Lamps of Stone and Eartlienware. .. / LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS IN THE TEXT H'l- PAftB 1 Neighbourhood of the Site 4 2. External Face of Great Wall, showing Revetment on the right and Bastion in the distance 7 3. The Site from N.E. Beach of Bouldere in the Foreground 8 4. The S.W. Angle and Baation of the Great Wall, above the Eroded Bay 9 a. The Eroded S.W. Corner of the Town from within 10 6. Stone Washing Trough in situ (F 2 : rf) 14 7. Stone Tank »»t sii!?t in G 3 16 8. Pillar built of Two Blocks 17 9. Monolithic Pillar 18 10. The Well Mouth 20 1 1 The Excavated Part of the Site looking towards the S. End of the Palace 21 12. Early House in J 2 from above 22 13. Ruined Walls witli the Cultivated Plain and the Hills in the distance 26 14. Plan and Section of Buildings in H 2, showing Work of Three Periods and Modern Terrace 28 1-5. The Town Wall looking West, showing an Ofiset in the Work of Period II and Bastion of Period III built up against it 30 16. Plan of Part of the Town Wall, and Enlarged Plan showing Staircase, ifcc 31 17. View of Passage through the Town Wall looking South 32 18. ViewofStairca.se 32 19. Suggested Restoration of Doorway in the Town Wall 33 20. Angle of the Town Wall 34 21. Remains of Period I 35 22. „ ,, „ showing Pavement and Doorway 36 23. House of Period I 37 24. „ „ „ 38 25. Block-Plan of Part of the Town of Period II 39 26. Plan of House of Period JI, with Stone Column 40 27. Plan of House of Period II 41 CONTENTS. FIO. 28. Vie wof Rooms in Fig. 27 looking towards the Sea 42 42 29. „ „ „ looking South 30. Diagram of Doorway in Fig. 27 4'5 31. Plan of House of Period II 43 44 32. „ „ „ 33. View of Room in Fig. 32 45 34. Plan of House of Period II 45 35. View of Staircase in Fig. 34 46 36. Section of Street and Drain (Plate I., H 3 : 13) and of Doorway ... 46 37. Plan of House of Period 11 47 38. View of Wall in H 1 (Plate I) 48 39. Diagram of Doorway in H 2 (Plate I) 48 40. View of Doorway in H 2 49 41. Details of Plaster Ceiling 50 42. Block-Plan of part of the Town of Period III 51 43.
Recommended publications
  • Bronze Age Aegean Harboursides
    J.W. SHAW Bronze Age Aegean Harboursides ABSTRACT R ecent excavations and exploration have contributed new and crucial information warranting a review of our earlier understanding of Bronze Age Aegean harboursides, especially of the topographical conditions and geographical locations selected by the Aegeans. Major sites which can be cited are Kea, Kommos, Zakros, and Amnisos. Further information derives from precious pictorial depictions of coastal towns and possible harbours, as in frescoes found at Kea and, especially, in the West House at Akrotiri, or in the recently published sealing from Chania. The paper will discuss this new material and address questions of defence, ship storage, relations with inland towns, trade, relative water-levels, and the nature of the possible harbour installations during the Middle and Late Bronze Age in the Aegean. Introduction With its often large, well-furnished buildings, the Akrotiri settlement (Fig. 1) appears relatively opulent in comparison with Ayia Irini on Kea (Fig. 2)or more densely built Phylakopi on Milos (Fig. 3). At Akrotiri, of course, there still remain unusual contrasts among the building groups. For instance, the agglutinative room-group B/D, which probably consisted of three or more residences, appears to be sprawling in comparison with the much larger, more carefully planned ashlar buildings, whether one considers the relatively small West House, or Ashlars III and IV which in size and with the care given to their construction compare favourably with the largest of the houses at Ayia Irini (House A) or at Phylakopi (the Mansion) or, for that matter, with large houses in the Knossos area.
    [Show full text]
  • Mycenaean Seminar List
    THE MYCENAEAN SEMINAR 1954–2017 Olga Krzyszkowska and Andrew Shapland This list gives titles of individual seminars (and related events) with links and references to their publication in BICS. Initially discussions and some summaries were printed in the Seminar minutes, which were privately circulated (only from 21st January 1959 were minutes headed ‘Mycenaean Seminar’). The first published summaries appeared in BICS 13 (1966), soon superseding the minutes. Some seminars/public lectures were published as full-length articles (page references to these are given in bold). Summaries were usually, but not always, published in the subsequent year’s BICS and some never appeared at all. However, from 1993–94 onwards summaries of all Seminars and virtually all public lectures relating to Aegean prehistory held at the Institute were published in BICS. The summaries for 2014–15 were the last to appear in the print edition of BICS, which has now become thematic. The summaries for 2015–16 and 2016–17 are published in an online supplement to BICS available at the Humanities Digital Library. 1953–1954 The first meeting was on 27 January 1954, and there were four subsequent meetings that academic year. Minutes were kept from the second meeting onwards. 1954–55 Papers were given by J. Chadwick, P. B. S. Andrews, R. D. Barnett, O. Gurney, F. Stubbings, L. R. Palmer, T. B. L. Webster and M. Ventris. 1955–56 M. Ventris ‘Pylos Ta series’ S. Piggott ‘Mycenaeans and the West’ R. A. Higgins ‘Archaeological basis for the Ta tablets’ (BICS 3: 39–44) G. L. Huxley ‘Mycenaean history and the Homeric Catalogue of Ships’ (BICS 3: 19–30) M.
    [Show full text]
  • OBSIDIAN in the PREHISTORIC AEGEAN: TRADE and Correspondence To: Mailinta Tsampiri USES [email protected]
    Volume 53 BGSG Research Paper OBSIDIAN IN THE PREHISTORIC AEGEAN: TRADE AND Correspondence to: Mailinta Tsampiri USES [email protected] 1 DOI number: Mailinta Tsampiri http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/ bgsg.18588 1 Archaeologist, S&B Industrial Minerals S.A. Keywords: Collaborator of the Ephorate of Antiquities of Cyclades in excavations in Melos Obsidian, Aegean, Melos, Blade, Giali, Phylakopi. Pansedon (3201) - Porto Rafti, Attica, Greece Email: [email protected] Citation: Tsampiri Mailinta (2018), Obsidian in the prehistoric Aegean: Trade and uses. Abstract Bulletin Geological Society of Greece, 53, 28- 49. This paper studies the prehistoric use of obsidian quarries in the Aegean. Obsidian sources in the eastern Mediterranean have been traced on certain Publication History: islands of the Aegean: Melos, Antiparos and Giali. Due to its hardness, this Received: 24/09/2018 material was already being used by the end of the Upper Palaeolithic to produce Accepted: 03/10/2018 Accepted article online: blades with sharp edges to serve as knives, scrapers and razors, arrowheads 03/10/2018 and spears, axes, saws and mattocks. This naturally occurring glass was also used for ornamental purposes. During the Late and the Final Neolithic Period The Editor wishes to thank Prof. M. Stamatakis, Prof. (ca. 5300-3200 B.C.), when the systematic habitation of the Cyclades developed, Hara Drinia and Ms Erietta the transportation of obsidian was incorporated in the gradually developing Vlachou for editorial assistance. trade networks of the Aegean. The material was much in demand in the early Bronze Age. During the later Bronze Age its use declined and by the classical ©2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Aegean Painting in the Bronze Age
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-86591-3 - The Cambridge History of: Painting in the Classical World Edited by J. J. Pollitt Excerpt More information C h a p t e r 1 AEGEAN PAINTING IN THE BRONZE AGE A n n e P. C h a p i n Th e frescoes discovered on the Palace site constitute a new epoch in the history of painting. Sir Arthur Evans, March 1901 1 N 5 APRIL 1900, new excavations led by Sir Arthur Evans at Knossos, Crete, were barely two weeks old when a mysterious fi gure in fresco was uncovered near the south propylon ( Fig. 1.1). “A great day”, Evans recorded in his journal as he noted the fi gure’s noble profi le, Obeautifully modeled arms, and tiny waist. It was, he observed “far and away the most remarkable human fi gure of the Mycenaean Age that has yet come to light.” Evans noted how even his workmen felt the painting’s spell, regarding its discov- ery as miraculous, the icon of a saint. Th e next morning, the Cretan man posted to guard the new fi nd told a story of how the wrathful saint had woken him at mid- night. Th e animals lowed and neighed, and there was, he said, “something about – but of a ghostly kind – φαντάζει [ fand á zi ] – it spooks!” 2 Th is incident more than a century ago encapsulates the reception of Aegean Bronze Age art, in which, even today, a lively mixture of fact, imagination, and emotion continues to influence its interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Palaeoethnobotany of the West House Akrotiri, Thera
    THE PALAEOETHNOBOTANY OF THE WEST HOUSE AKROTIRI, THERA A CASE STUDY Submitted in fulfillment of a Doctorate in Philosophy Department of Archaeology and Prehistory University of Sheffield Anaya Anastasia Sarpaki December 1987 gedicatioit tFo 9fl4,onj aelmt,a. Contents List of Plates i List of Tables List of Figures Acknowledgements xii Summary xv Abbreviations xvi Preface xvii 1 The environment and agriculture of modern Greece 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.1.1 Relief 2 1.1.2 Water-drainage systems: the present 4 1.1.3 Climate 5 1.1.4 Greek soils 9 1.1.5 Plant communities 18 1.1.6 Present-day agricultural systems 25 1.1.7 Thera: crop cultivation 37 2 The environment of Greece in the past 44 2.1 Introduction 44 2.1.1 The climate 44 2.1.2 The drainage 46 2.1.3 Soils of Thera 47 2.1.4 Pollen analysis in Crete 48 2.1.5 Deforestation 55 2.1.6 Architectural evidence 56 2.1.7 Documentary evidence 60 2.1.8 Archaeological data 64 2.1.9 Discussion 67 3 Archaeobotanical studies 69 3.1 Introduction 69 3.1.1 Archaeobotany in Greece - The early days 70 3.1.2 Archaeobotany in Greece - The later days 71 3.1.3 Approaches to archaeobotany - The early days 76 3.1.4 Approaches to archaeobotany - The loss of innocence 80 3.1.5 Models of crop-processing and beyond 85 3.1.6 Recovery methods and sampling 92 3.1.7 Interpretation 97 4 Thera: The background 99 4.1 Introduction 99 4.1.1 The macro-context: the island 99 4.1.2 Settlement pattern 101 4.1.3 Agricultural production: past and present 103 4.1.4 Akrotiri: The micro-context 106 4.1.5 Discussion 137 5 Akrotiri: The palaeoethnobotany 139 5.1 Introduction 139 5.1.1 Choice of area studied 141 5.1.2 Choice of samples 142 5.1.3 Sampling methods 143 5.1.4 Plant remains 145 5.1.5 Insect infestation 168 5.1.6 Weeds and wild plants 168 5.1.7 Preservation by charring 170 5.1.8 Preservation by silicification 174 5.1.9 Preservation by mineralization 175 6 Akrotiri: Interpretation of palaeoethnobotanical data 176 6.1 Introduction 176 6.1.1 Background information 176 6.1.2 cf.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potter's Wheel at Phylakopi, Melos
    Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 26 (2007) 234–252 www.elsevier.com/locate/jaa Meaning in the making: The potter’s wheel at Phylakopi, Melos (Greece) Ina Berg ¤ Department of Archaeology, University of Manchester, School of Arts, Histories and Cultures, Humanities Bridgeford Street Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK Received 24 February 2006; revision received 28 September 2006 Available online 12 December 2006 Abstract It is now commonly accepted that technology is, to its very core, a social product through which we can explore cultural choices. This cultural dimension of technology will be examined with reference to the introduction and use of the potter’s wheel at Phylakopi on Melos (Greece) during the Late Bronze Age. At this site, the co-existence of two diVerent manufac- turing techniques was so deeply embedded that, despite the presence of hybrid vessels, many aspects of the pottery produc- tion had become linked to either a local (hand-built) or Minoanising (wheel-thrown) tradition. It will be argued that the traditional hand-building technique was associated with individual and rooted facets of the Melian identity (such as kin- ship, social class, or gender). Reasons for the initial stimulus for adoption of the potter’s wheel are considered to lie in its potential for competitive social practice through association with exotic, symbolically laden technologies, craft products and consumption rituals. The gradual application of the technology to ever more complex vessels, on the other hand, corre- sponds to the apprenticeship sequence outlined by Roux and Corbetta and may indicate an incomplete learning process or a certain lack of practice opportunities among local potters.
    [Show full text]
  • Aegis-4 410..410 ++
    Current Approaches and New Perspectives in Aegean Iconography Edited by Fritz Blakolmer Printed with financial support from the Faculty of Historical and Cultural Studies of the University of Vienna and the Institute of Aegean Prehistory (INSTAP). # Presses universitaires de Louvain, 2020 http://pul.uclouvain.be Registration of copyright : D/2020/9964/29 ISBN : 978-2-87558-968-2 ISBN pdf version : 978-2-87558-969-9 PrintedinBelgiumbyCIACOscrl– printer number 100758 All right reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, adapted or translated, in any form or by any means, in any country, without the prior permission of Presses universitaires de Louvain Cover design : Marie-Hélène Grégoire Cover image : model of polythyron hall 3, Xeste 3 in Akrotiri, Thera, by Ute Günkel-Maschek (based on the drawing in A. Vlachopoulos, The wall paintings from the Xeste 3 building at Akrotiri, in Horizon. A Colloquium on the Prehistory of the Cyclades, edited by N. Brodie et al., Cambridge (2008), 458, fig. 41.19. Courtesy: A. Vlachopoulos – Akrotiri Excavations / Drawing : Maria Kriga) Volume set in Arbortext Advanced Print Publisher by Roman Jacobek, Vienna, Austria Distribution: www.i6doc.com, on-line university publishers Available on order from bookshops or at Diffusion universitaire CIACO (University Distributors) Grand-Rue, 2/14 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium Tel:+3210473378 Fax:+3210457350 [email protected] Distributor in France: Librairie Wallonie-Bruxelles 46 rue Quincampoix 75004 Paris, France Tel:+33142715803 Fax:+33142715809 [email protected] Narrative in Aegean Art: A Methodology of Identification and Interpretation* John G. Younger Abstract: This study continues previous work on identifying narratives and myths that are illustrated in Aegean Bronze Age art.
    [Show full text]
  • The British School at Athens June 2018
    The British School at Athens June an institute for advanced research 2018 presentations that were made at our From the Director AGM in February, we will make the structure of our support base simpler the Library and Archive, the Fitch and clearer from 1 January 2019. Laboratory and the Knossos Research Our Development Officer covers Centre. As always, most of our lectures the process in greater detail below, are available on our YouTube channel. outlining the associated entitlements, The Knossos Research Centre hosted but we are introducing three levels of a visit by the BSA’s Patron, HRH The support: Friends, Pendlebury Circle Prince of Wales in May. The occasion and Director’s Circle, as well as a new was the event ‘Cooking Like Minoans’, category for legacy pledges, the 1886 co-organised with Branding Heritage, Circle. We hope that all current Friends part of a deliberate strategy by the BSA of the BSA UK and subscribers world- HE the Ambassador, HRH The Prince of Wales and the Director in the Knossos to boost its visibility beyond its core wide will remain part of our community Stratigraphical Museum (V. Goumas) stakeholders. Other similar initiatives and that those able to do so will have seen us sponsor lectures for a consider supporting the BSA at one of It is a great pleasure to introduce the general audience in Manchester, as the two higher levels. The good news third issue of our newsletter and to well as in London, including a highly is that the switch to a calendar-year wish everyone well for a productive successful lecture by Ian Collins on renewal cycle means that everyone on and enjoyable summer.
    [Show full text]
  • Precursory Volcanic Activity and Cultural Response to the Late Bronze Age Eruption Of
    PRECURSORY VOLCANIC ACTIVITY AND CULTURAL RESPONSE TO THE LATE BRONZE AGE ERUPTION OF SANTORINI (THERA), GREECE A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAIʻI AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS MAY 2020 By Krista Jaclyn Evans Thesis Committee: Floyd W. McCoy, Chairperson Bruce Houghton Robert Littman Acknowledgements Thank you to my advisor, committee chair, and mentor, Dr. Floyd McCoy, for his support and dedication for the completion of this project. Dr. McCoy has pushed me to attend several conferences which has led to a press conference at AGU’s Fall 2019 meeting. I am truly grateful to him for making me a better student and scientist. I have learned a lot from Dr. McCoy and hope to continue working with him in the future. My committee members, Drs. Bruce Houghton and Robert Littman have been truly gracious and generous with their time during the development of this work. Bruce has especially contributed not only as part of my committee, but through his classes and field trips. Laboratory processing was done on both the Manoa and Windward campuses of the University of Hawaii. At the latter campus, Lisa Hayashi is thanked for her assistance and help. Laboratory work in Greece was accomplished at the INSTAP Center for East Crete, courtesy of Dr. Tom Brogan, Director. Dr Thomas Shea, at the University of Hawaii, allowed me to use his picking scope to look at some of the samples when it came to the componentry, for which I extremely thankful.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bronze Age Case Study from Akrotiri, Thera
    hesperia yy (2008) COLONIALISM WITHOUT Pages 1?42 COLONIES? A Bronze Age Case Study from Akrotiri, Thera ABSTRACT on Using ceramic evidence from Bronze Age Akrotiri Thera, the authors a explore the idea that regional cultural interactions of "colonialista character can take without the occurrence of colonization se. assess the place per They types and frequency of Cretan Middle Minoan IILA imports from selected deposits at the site, the nature of local imitations of Cretan pottery, and the a adoption of characteristically Cretan technology, the potter's wheel. By comparing processes of material, stylistic, and technological transfer, the to s authors seek characterize Crete influence off-island and the responses of neighboring island communities, concluding that Cretan material culture is more a cause than an effect of Minoanization. INTRODUCTION The debate over the character of Crete's influence across the southern Aegean in the Neopalatial period received considerable impetus with a series of papers published in the early 1980s.1 Yet, while the evidence has on continued to accumulate since, particularly with work Kythera, Thera, Rhodes, and Kos, as well as on the coast of Asia Minor atMiletos and 1. Dimitris Sakatzis for E.g., Branigan 1981; Davis 1982, pottery drawings; gave freely of their time and knowledge 1984; Schofield 1982; H?gg andMari photography; and Lucy Valassi for help in providing stimulating discussion: natos 1984. with the translation of the 1984; Wiener catalogue Cyprian Broodbank, Fragoula Georma, are to were We grateful the director of and database entries. We fortunate Colin Macdonald, and Nicoletta Mo to have the Akrotiri Excavations, Christos Angeliki Moschou working migliano.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Ashbacher Mariah Thesis.Pdf (2.334Mb)
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE ZOOMORPHIC REPRESENTATIONS IN EARLY CYCLADIC ART: A CATALOGUE REFERENCE LIST A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN ART HISTORY By MARIAH LOUANN ASHBACHER Norman, Oklahoma 2017 ZOOMORPHIC REPRESENTATIONS IN EARLY CYCLADIC ART: A CATALOGUE REFERENCE LIST A THESIS APPROVED FOR THE SCHOOL OF VISUAL ARTS BY ______________________________ Dr. Rozmeri Basic, Chair ______________________________ Dr. Mary Jo Watson ______________________________ Dr. Allison Palmer © Copyright by MARIAH LOUANN ASHBACHER 2017 All Rights Reserved. I dedicate this thesis to my husband, Todd, and to my children, Christian, Parker and Madison. Acknowledgements I would like to acknowledge the mentoring I received from Dr. Rozmeri Basic over the last four years, who introduced me to the Aegean Bronze Age. It is because of her that I decided to study Art History. Through my studies at the School of Visual Arts, I became acquainted with several professors who shaped my education, including Dr. W. Jackson Rushing, III, Dr. Robert Bailey, Professor Victor Youritzin, and Professor B. Byron Price. I also want to particularly mention Dr. Mary Jo Watson and Dr. Allison Palmer, who along with Dr. Basic, have been sources of immeasurable inspiration as art historians, professors, and women. I thank them for their contribution to this thesis as members of my committee and for shaping me as an emerging art historian. iv Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Museums, Sites & Monuments
    MUSEUMS, SITES & MONUMENTS Art Space, Exo Gonia, Tel 2286032774, web: www.artspace-santorini.com Jewish Museum of Rhodes, Tel 2241022364, web: www.rhodesjewishmuseum.org Emm. Lignos Museum, Kontochori, Tel 2286022792 Museum of Modern Greek Art, Tel 2241023766, web: www.mgamuseum.gr Maritime Museum of Thera, Oia, Tel 2286071156 Palace of the Grand Master, Tel 2241043489 Megaro Gyzi, Fira, Tel 2286023077, web: www.megarogyzi.gr Museum of Prehistoric Thera, Fira, Tel 2286023217 Symi Island Thera Wallpainting Exhibition, Nomikos Conference Centre, Fira, Tel 2286023016 Museum of Symi, Tel 2246071114 Wine Museum "Volcan Wines", Vothonas, Tel 2286031322, web: www.volcanwines.gr Nautical Museum of Symi, Tel 2246072363 Serifos Island Tilos Island Archaeological Collection of Serifos, Tel 2281052611 Museum of Tilos, Tel 2246044212 Sifnos Island Archaeological Museum of Sifnos (Temporarily closed) , Tel 2284031022 Dodekanissos Islands Sites & Monuments Folklore and Folk Art Museum of Sifnos, Tel 2284033730 Acropolis of Ialysos, Tel 2241092202 • Acropolis of Lindos, Tel 2244031258 • Syros Island Acropolis of Rhodes, Tel 2241025500 • Altar of Dionysus, Kos, Tel 2242028326 • Archaeological Museum of Syros, Tel 2281088487 Archaeological Site of Ancient Agora and Port of Kos, Tel 2242028326 • Archaeological Site of Kameiros, Tel 2241040037 • Archaeological Site of Rodini, Art Gallery of the Cyclades, Tel 2281080918 Tel 2241075674 • Asklepieion of Kos Tel 2242028763 • Casa Romana, Kos, Tel Industrial Museum of Ermoupolis, Tel 2281081243, web: www.imsyros.gr
    [Show full text]