DOCSLIB.ORG

Περίληψη : Γενικές Πληροφορίες Area: 158.403 Km2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

IΔΡΥΜA ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ Συγγραφή : Γεώρμα Φραγκούλα , Γεώρμα Φραγκούλα , Μαυροειδή Μαρία , Καρβώνης Παύλος , Καρβώνης Παύλος , Καρβώνης Παύλος Μετάφραση : Παπαδάκη Ειρήνη , Παπαδάκη Ειρήνη , Ντοβλέτης Ονούφριος , Ντοβλέτης Ονούφριος , Ντοβλέτης Ονούφριος , Νάκας Ιωάννης , Νάκας Ιωάννης (30/10/2006) Για παραπομπή : Γεώρμα Φραγκούλα , Γεώρμα Φραγκούλα , Μαυροειδή Μαρία , Περίληψη : Γενικές Πληροφορίες Area: 158.403 km2 Coastline length: 139 km Population: 4.771 Island capital and its population: Plaka (Milos), 792 Administrative structure: Region of South Aegean, Prefecture of the Cyclades, Province of Milos, Municipality of Milos Local newspapers: Politis tis Milou, Milos, Foni tis Milou Local radio stations: Milos 102,5 FM Museums: Archaeological Museum, Ecclesiastical Museum, Folklore Museum, Mining Museum Archaeological sites and monuments: Phylakopi, the Catacombs, Ancient Theatre. The island has been included in the list of "100 Mediterranean archaeological sites" by the Mediterranean Action Plan of the United Nations and UNESCO Natural monuments: The area of Profitis Ilias has been included on the European network NATURA 2000 as a Site of Community Importance (SCI). The western part of the island has been declared an Important Bird Area of Greece Traditional settlements: Plaka, Klima, Trypiti, Fourkovouni Cultural clubs: Union of Friends of Adamas, Educational and Social Association, Union of Plaka, Apollonians' Cultural Association of Milos (POSPOM) Festivals: Milos annual festival (July, August): cultural events under the auspices of the Municipality (donor: S&B Industrial Minerals) Religious feasts: Holy Trinity at Adamas (50 days after Easter), Feast at Klima with mass at the catacombs (June 9th), on St George's day at Triovasalos (April 23d), on St Anargiroi's day (June 30th), on St Kyriaki's day (July 6th), on St Marina's day at Chalakas (July 16th), on Prophet Elias' day at Chalakas and at Komia (July 19th), on St Markela's day at Kipos (July 21st), on St Paraskevi's day at Pollonia (July 25th), on St Panteleimon's day at Plakota and at Korfos (July 26th), Holy Cross Feast at Plaka (July 31st), Transfiguration of the Saviour at Parasporos (August 5th), Dormition of Virgin Mary at Zefyria (August 14th-15th), on St Floros' day at Komia (August 17th), on August 22 at Panagia Giatrissa at Komia, Panagia tou Kipou and Panagia Faneromeni at Trypiti, on St Fanourios' day at Pollonia (August 26th), on the eve of the Decapitation of St John at Agrilies and at Provatas (August 28th), on St Alexandros' day at Katsoulis (August 29th), at the Pandokratoras at Mytakas (August 31st), at Agios Sostis at Provatas (September 6th), at Panagia Eleousa at Psathadika (September 7th), at Panagia Korfiatissa at Plaka (September 8th), Holy Cross at Kaneria (September 13th), on St Sophia's day at Chalakas (September 16th), on St John's day at Chalakas (September 25th), on St Spyridon's day at Triovasalos (December 12th) Sport clubs: Milos Nautical Club (sailing), Milos Sport Club (football, athletics) 1. Position - Environment Milos is located at the southwestern end of the Cyclades, 86 miles away from Piraeus. Its shape is irregular. From north to south it measures about 11.2 km, while from east to west 17.6 km. What characterizes it is the gulf at its north part. It goes 5,5 nautical miles deep into the island and is the second largest gulf in Greece. The ground of Milos is mountainous for the most part culminating in Profitis Ilias (751 m). Its few lowlands are situated at its northeastern part. Milos is a volcanic island, located on the south Aegean volcanic arc. It has two dormant volcanoes: that of Fyriplaka at the central part of the island, and of Trachilas at the northwestern part. The first one has a crater with a diameter of 1,700 m and is 220 m high. Δημιουργήθηκε στις 26/9/2021 Σελίδα 1/11 IΔΡΥΜA ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ Συγγραφή : Γεώρμα Φραγκούλα , Γεώρμα Φραγκούλα , Μαυροειδή Μαρία , Καρβώνης Παύλος , Καρβώνης Παύλος , Καρβώνης Παύλος Μετάφραση : Παπαδάκη Ειρήνη , Παπαδάκη Ειρήνη , Ντοβλέτης Ονούφριος , Ντοβλέτης Ονούφριος , Ντοβλέτης Ονούφριος , Νάκας Ιωάννης , Νάκας Ιωάννης (30/10/2006) Για παραπομπή : Γεώρμα Φραγκούλα , Γεώρμα Φραγκούλα , Μαυροειδή Μαρία , There are some hot sulphurous springs at the eastern part of the island and mostly the southeastern one, both on ground surface and underwater. This geological activity is also useful: the Public Power Corporation has established there a geothermoelectrical station, which covers a part of the island’s demand on electricity. The volcanic activity has created submarine caves of great beauty, such as Smaragdenia Spilia (“Emerald Cave”), Kleftiko and Papafraga. Milos’ground is fertile, producing citrus fruits, garden produce, grain, olives and figs. (Pavlos Karvonis) 2. Fauna of Milos: the Milos Viper On the island complex of Milos there are many endemic species and subspecies of reptiles, namely species that cannot be found anywhere else in the world. The Milos Viper (Macrovipera schweizeri) and the Milos Wall Lizard (Podarcis milensis) are two of those. Even though the latter is quite common on the island, it is endemic. The Balkan Freshwater Turtle (Mauremys rivulata) survives only in the area of Achivadolimni where a few individuals have been seen, whereas the endemic subspecies of the Water Snake (Natrix natrix schweizeri) is very rare on Milos. The subspecies of the Balkan Green Lizard (Lacerta trilineata hansschweizeri) is also endemic. The Kotschy’s Gecko (Cyrtopodion kotschyi), the European Copper Skink (Ablepharus kitaibelii) and the Mediterranean House Gecko (Hemidactylus turcicus) are also common lizard species on Milos. There are two more snake species there: the European Cat Snake (Telescopus fallax), probably the most common snake species in the area, and the Leopard Snake (Elaphe situla), seen mostly at rural land. The Milos viper is seen only on Milos (where its largest populations live), Sifnos, Kimolos and Polyaigos. Until recently, it was included in the Vipera lebetina species, which is widely spread in North Africa and the Near and Middle East, from Turkey and Cyprus up to Kashmir. The geographical isolation of the Greek populations is believed to be 5 million years old. The differences that developed between these populations led scientists to classify it into a different species. The Milos Viper has 23 rows of dorsal flakes in the middle of its body. It has small dimensions, since adults grow to an average length less than 85 cm, with a maximum of 1 m. Colour diversity is an attribute of this species. The individuals are usually grey-brown or grey-yellow, with bright coloured patternings in brown or yellow. On Milos, we also find whole-coloured individuals with red colour, which can vary from orange to a brownish red. Its mating season is spring. It lays 4-13 eggs, usually 7-11. The young feed themselves mostly with lizards and invertebrates, whereas adults eat birds, rodents and lizards. Unfortunately, the viper of Milos is an endangered species. This is due to a variety of reasons, the most important being the destruction of its habitat. Many collectors, attracted by the rareness of the species, have contributed to the further decline of its population. Many individuals are also killed on the road by cars. The Milos Viper is a protected species according to Greek Law (Presidential Decree 67/1980, Official Government Gazette 23/30.1.1981). Therefore capturing, owning, killing and trading living or dead individuals is prohibited. The species is also protected by the Washington and Berne Conventions. It is also listed as strictly protected under the European Community Directive 92/43 (Appendix II), which means it falls into the same category with the Bear, the Mediterranean Seal and the Sea-Turtle Caretta-caretta. The Milos Viper is a particularly significant part of our natural heritage, an integral part of the island’s environment and natural habitats. The species is also of great scientific interest due to the island populations’geographical isolation from their closest relatives in Asia Minor and Cyprus. (Maria Dimaki) 3. History Δημιουργήθηκε στις 26/9/2021 Σελίδα 2/11 IΔΡΥΜA ΜΕΙΖΟΝΟΣ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ Συγγραφή : Γεώρμα Φραγκούλα , Γεώρμα Φραγκούλα , Μαυροειδή Μαρία , Καρβώνης Παύλος , Καρβώνης Παύλος , Καρβώνης Παύλος Μετάφραση : Παπαδάκη Ειρήνη , Παπαδάκη Ειρήνη , Ντοβλέτης Ονούφριος , Ντοβλέτης Ονούφριος , Ντοβλέτης Ονούφριος , Νάκας Ιωάννης , Νάκας Ιωάννης (30/10/2006) Για παραπομπή : Γεώρμα Φραγκούλα , Γεώρμα Φραγκούλα , Μαυροειδή Μαρία , 3. 1. Prehistoric Times Human presence on Milos is attested from the second half of the 8th millennium BC (Mesolithic Period). At Nychia and Demenegaki there were facilities for the extraction of obsidian already since the Neolithic Period. During the Early Bronze Age (3300-2000 BC), mines developed at Chalakas, Pilos, Phylakopi and elsewhere. The first organized settlement of Phylakopi was built around 2200 BC. In 2000 BC the settlement was fortified, organized in blocks and acquired a road network and sewage system. The city was destroyed and was rebuilt in 1550 BC, while new disaster struck in 1400 BC. It was finally deserted in the 11th century. (Pavlos Karvonis) (Transl. Onoufrios Dovletis) 3. 1. 1. Obsidian The word obsidian (in Greek: οψιδιανός, later οψιανός) comes from the Latin obsidianus. It is a hard volcanic rock with a glassy appearance and sleek black color. Due to its being a hard rock with sharp cutting edges after processing, it constituted, especially during the Neolithic period, a widespread raw material for the construction of tools (e.g. blades) and weapons (e.g. arrowheads). In Greece, deposits of this rock can only be found in the volcanic island of Milos and the small island of Gyali, next to Nisyros. Geologists can distinguish between the deposit products of each island, making it easy to trace the origins of an archaeological find. Tool samples and obsidian core process waste were found in the Franchthi cave in Argolis, in a layer dating from the 11th millennium BC (Upper Paleolithic period). Tools dating from the Mesolithic period (ca.
Recommended publications
  • Bronze Age Aegean Harboursides

    Bronze Age Aegean Harboursides

    J.W. SHAW Bronze Age Aegean Harboursides ABSTRACT R ecent excavations and exploration have contributed new and crucial information warranting a review of our earlier understanding of Bronze Age Aegean harboursides, especially of the topographical conditions and geographical locations selected by the Aegeans. Major sites which can be cited are Kea, Kommos, Zakros, and Amnisos. Further information derives from precious pictorial depictions of coastal towns and possible harbours, as in frescoes found at Kea and, especially, in the West House at Akrotiri, or in the recently published sealing from Chania. The paper will discuss this new material and address questions of defence, ship storage, relations with inland towns, trade, relative water-levels, and the nature of the possible harbour installations during the Middle and Late Bronze Age in the Aegean. Introduction With its often large, well-furnished buildings, the Akrotiri settlement (Fig. 1) appears relatively opulent in comparison with Ayia Irini on Kea (Fig. 2)or more densely built Phylakopi on Milos (Fig. 3). At Akrotiri, of course, there still remain unusual contrasts among the building groups. For instance, the agglutinative room-group B/D, which probably consisted of three or more residences, appears to be sprawling in comparison with the much larger, more carefully planned ashlar buildings, whether one considers the relatively small West House, or Ashlars III and IV which in size and with the care given to their construction compare favourably with the largest of the houses at Ayia Irini (House A) or at Phylakopi (the Mansion) or, for that matter, with large houses in the Knossos area.
  • Herpetofaunistic Diversity of the Cres-Lošinj Archipelago (Croatian Adriatic)

    Herpetofaunistic Diversity of the Cres-Lošinj Archipelago (Croatian Adriatic)

    University of Sopron Roth Gyula Doctoral School of Forestry and Wildlife Management Sciences Ph.D. thesis Herpetofaunistic diversity of the Cres-Lošinj Archipelago (Croatian Adriatic) Tamás Tóth Sopron 2018 Roth Gyula Doctoral School of Forestry and Wildlife Management Sciences Nature Conservation Program Supervisors: Prof. Dr. Faragó Sándor Dr. Gál János Introduction In recent years the Croatian islands, especially those of the Cres-Lošinj Archipelago became the focus of research of herpetologists. However, in spite of a long interest encompassing more than a hundred years, numerous gaps remain in our herpetological knowledge. For this reason, the author wished to contribute to a better understanding by performing studies outlined below. Aims The first task was to map the distribution of amphibians and reptiles inhabiting the archipelago as data were lacking for several of the smaller islands and also the fauna of the bigger islands was insufficiently known. Subsequently, the faunistic information derived from the scientific literature and field surveys conducted by the author as well as available geological and paleogeological data were compared and analysed from a zoogeographic point of view. The author wished to identify regions of the islands boasting the greatest herpetofaunal diversity by creating dot maps based on collecting localities. To answer the question which snake species and which individuals are going to be a victim of the traffic snake roadkill and literature survey were used. The author also identified where are the areas where the most snakes are hit by a vehicle on Cres. By gathering road-killed snakes and comparing their locality data with published occurrences the author seeked to identify species most vulnerable to vehicular traffic and road sections posing the greatest threat to snakes on Cres Island.
  • Mycenaean Seminar List

    Mycenaean Seminar List

    THE MYCENAEAN SEMINAR 1954–2017 Olga Krzyszkowska and Andrew Shapland This list gives titles of individual seminars (and related events) with links and references to their publication in BICS. Initially discussions and some summaries were printed in the Seminar minutes, which were privately circulated (only from 21st January 1959 were minutes headed ‘Mycenaean Seminar’). The first published summaries appeared in BICS 13 (1966), soon superseding the minutes. Some seminars/public lectures were published as full-length articles (page references to these are given in bold). Summaries were usually, but not always, published in the subsequent year’s BICS and some never appeared at all. However, from 1993–94 onwards summaries of all Seminars and virtually all public lectures relating to Aegean prehistory held at the Institute were published in BICS. The summaries for 2014–15 were the last to appear in the print edition of BICS, which has now become thematic. The summaries for 2015–16 and 2016–17 are published in an online supplement to BICS available at the Humanities Digital Library. 1953–1954 The first meeting was on 27 January 1954, and there were four subsequent meetings that academic year. Minutes were kept from the second meeting onwards. 1954–55 Papers were given by J. Chadwick, P. B. S. Andrews, R. D. Barnett, O. Gurney, F. Stubbings, L. R. Palmer, T. B. L. Webster and M. Ventris. 1955–56 M. Ventris ‘Pylos Ta series’ S. Piggott ‘Mycenaeans and the West’ R. A. Higgins ‘Archaeological basis for the Ta tablets’ (BICS 3: 39–44) G. L. Huxley ‘Mycenaean history and the Homeric Catalogue of Ships’ (BICS 3: 19–30) M.
  • OBSIDIAN in the PREHISTORIC AEGEAN: TRADE and Correspondence To: Mailinta Tsampiri USES Mtsampiri@Yahoo.Gr

    OBSIDIAN in the PREHISTORIC AEGEAN: TRADE and Correspondence To: Mailinta Tsampiri USES [email protected]

    Volume 53 BGSG Research Paper OBSIDIAN IN THE PREHISTORIC AEGEAN: TRADE AND Correspondence to: Mailinta Tsampiri USES [email protected] 1 DOI number: Mailinta Tsampiri http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/ bgsg.18588 1 Archaeologist, S&B Industrial Minerals S.A. Keywords: Collaborator of the Ephorate of Antiquities of Cyclades in excavations in Melos Obsidian, Aegean, Melos, Blade, Giali, Phylakopi. Pansedon (3201) - Porto Rafti, Attica, Greece Email: [email protected] Citation: Tsampiri Mailinta (2018), Obsidian in the prehistoric Aegean: Trade and uses. Abstract Bulletin Geological Society of Greece, 53, 28- 49. This paper studies the prehistoric use of obsidian quarries in the Aegean. Obsidian sources in the eastern Mediterranean have been traced on certain Publication History: islands of the Aegean: Melos, Antiparos and Giali. Due to its hardness, this Received: 24/09/2018 material was already being used by the end of the Upper Palaeolithic to produce Accepted: 03/10/2018 Accepted article online: blades with sharp edges to serve as knives, scrapers and razors, arrowheads 03/10/2018 and spears, axes, saws and mattocks. This naturally occurring glass was also used for ornamental purposes. During the Late and the Final Neolithic Period The Editor wishes to thank Prof. M. Stamatakis, Prof. (ca. 5300-3200 B.C.), when the systematic habitation of the Cyclades developed, Hara Drinia and Ms Erietta the transportation of obsidian was incorporated in the gradually developing Vlachou for editorial assistance. trade networks of the Aegean. The material was much in demand in the early Bronze Age. During the later Bronze Age its use declined and by the classical ©2018.
  • Aegean Painting in the Bronze Age

    Aegean Painting in the Bronze Age

    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-86591-3 - The Cambridge History of: Painting in the Classical World Edited by J. J. Pollitt Excerpt More information C h a p t e r 1 AEGEAN PAINTING IN THE BRONZE AGE A n n e P. C h a p i n Th e frescoes discovered on the Palace site constitute a new epoch in the history of painting. Sir Arthur Evans, March 1901 1 N 5 APRIL 1900, new excavations led by Sir Arthur Evans at Knossos, Crete, were barely two weeks old when a mysterious fi gure in fresco was uncovered near the south propylon ( Fig. 1.1). “A great day”, Evans recorded in his journal as he noted the fi gure’s noble profi le, Obeautifully modeled arms, and tiny waist. It was, he observed “far and away the most remarkable human fi gure of the Mycenaean Age that has yet come to light.” Evans noted how even his workmen felt the painting’s spell, regarding its discov- ery as miraculous, the icon of a saint. Th e next morning, the Cretan man posted to guard the new fi nd told a story of how the wrathful saint had woken him at mid- night. Th e animals lowed and neighed, and there was, he said, “something about – but of a ghostly kind – φαντάζει [ fand á zi ] – it spooks!” 2 Th is incident more than a century ago encapsulates the reception of Aegean Bronze Age art, in which, even today, a lively mixture of fact, imagination, and emotion continues to influence its interpretation.
  • Studi Trentini Di Scienze Naturali, 99 (2020): 21-24

    Studi Trentini Di Scienze Naturali, 99 (2020): 21-24

    Studi Trentini di Scienze Naturali, 99 (2020): 21-24 Studi Trentini di Scienze Naturali vol. 99 Studi Trentini di Scienze Naturali 2020 ISSN 2532-7712 homepage: http://www.muse.it/it/Editoria-Muse/Studi-Trentini-Scienze-Naturali/Pagine/home.aspx © 2020 MUSE - Museo delle Scienze, Trento, Italia Nota Breve Distribuzione e nuovo limite nord occidentale di Telescopus fallax (Fleischmann, 1831) in Friuli-Venezia Giulia (Serpentes, Colubridae) Matteo Riccardo Di Nicola1,*, Erika Vida Calcich2, Thomas Zabbia3 1 Via Bobbio, 20144 Milano (MI) 2 Regione FVG / CESFAM - Centro servizi per le foreste e le attività della montagna, 33026 Paluzza (UD) 3 Via Giuseppe Ungaretti, 22030 Orsenigo (CO) Parole chiave Summary • Distribuzione Telescopus fallax (Fleischmann, 1831) è un colubride con abitudini notturne-crepuscolari, rinveni- • serpente gatto europeo bile principalmente in habitat rocciosi e xerici. La specie ha un corotipo Turanico-Mediterraneo e in • nuove segnalazioni Italia era noto finora solo per le aree carsiche della Provincia di Trieste. Con questo lavoro gli auto- • Friuli-Venezia Giulia ri aggiornano le informazioni sulla distribuzione italiana di T. fallax, segnalandola per la prima volta nella Provincia di Gorizia. L’areale della specie è quindi più esteso, oltre la Provincia di Udine, pro- babilmente a causa di una traslocazione antropica. Viene fornito anche l’elenco aggiornato delle Key words segnalazioni della specie in Italia. • Distribution • European Cat Snake Summary • new records • Friuli-Venezia Giulia Telescopus fallax (Fleischmann, 1831) is a colubrid with nocturnal-crepuscular habits, mainly found in rocky and xeric environments. The species has a Turanian–Mediterranean chorotype and in Italy is so far confined to karst areas in the Province of Trieste.
  • Nature Park of Sitia Is on the Easternmost Edge of Crete, in the Municipality of Sitia

    Nature Park of Sitia Is on the Easternmost Edge of Crete, in the Municipality of Sitia

    This publication was designed by the Natural History Museum of Crete for the Municipal- ity of Sitia, due to the implementation of the action 2.3.1 “Development of an Ecotouristic guide” of the project “Geotourism and local development (GEOTOPIA)”, funded 80% by the European Union and by 20% by national funds from Greece and Cyprus, through the Greece-Cyprus 2007 - 2013 cross-border cooperation programme. “GEOTOPIA” refers to the collaboration of two mountainous and insular areas, the Munici- pality of Sitia in Crete and the mountain Troodos in Cyprus, which are characterized by their wealthy natural, geological and cultural environment, by underdevelopment and depopu- lation of the hinterland, and by the depreciation of their landscape, aiming to promote their natural and cultural environment, to develop geotouristic activities and finally, establish a geopark. Museum Scientific Coordinator: Dr Charalampos Fassoulas Authors: Fassoulas C. – Dr geologist, Staridas S. – Msc geologist, Perakis N. – environmentalist, Mavroudi N. – archaeologist, Trichas A. – Dr biologist, Avramakis M. – botanist, Perakis V. – botanist, Mavrokosta C. – speleologist. Map design: Staridas S. Graphics design: Harkoutsis G. Text compilation: Dr Fassoulas C. Text correction: Mavroudi N. Translation in English: Interpretation and Translation Center. Jeni Kantarti Loutsa & collaborators, Thessaloniki Copyright: Natural History Museum of Crete / University of Crete, Sitia Nature Park Copyright of pictures and illustrations: Natural History Museum of Crete / Uni. of
  • The Palaeoethnobotany of the West House Akrotiri, Thera

    The Palaeoethnobotany of the West House Akrotiri, Thera

    THE PALAEOETHNOBOTANY OF THE WEST HOUSE AKROTIRI, THERA A CASE STUDY Submitted in fulfillment of a Doctorate in Philosophy Department of Archaeology and Prehistory University of Sheffield Anaya Anastasia Sarpaki December 1987 gedicatioit tFo 9fl4,onj aelmt,a. Contents List of Plates i List of Tables List of Figures Acknowledgements xii Summary xv Abbreviations xvi Preface xvii 1 The environment and agriculture of modern Greece 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.1.1 Relief 2 1.1.2 Water-drainage systems: the present 4 1.1.3 Climate 5 1.1.4 Greek soils 9 1.1.5 Plant communities 18 1.1.6 Present-day agricultural systems 25 1.1.7 Thera: crop cultivation 37 2 The environment of Greece in the past 44 2.1 Introduction 44 2.1.1 The climate 44 2.1.2 The drainage 46 2.1.3 Soils of Thera 47 2.1.4 Pollen analysis in Crete 48 2.1.5 Deforestation 55 2.1.6 Architectural evidence 56 2.1.7 Documentary evidence 60 2.1.8 Archaeological data 64 2.1.9 Discussion 67 3 Archaeobotanical studies 69 3.1 Introduction 69 3.1.1 Archaeobotany in Greece - The early days 70 3.1.2 Archaeobotany in Greece - The later days 71 3.1.3 Approaches to archaeobotany - The early days 76 3.1.4 Approaches to archaeobotany - The loss of innocence 80 3.1.5 Models of crop-processing and beyond 85 3.1.6 Recovery methods and sampling 92 3.1.7 Interpretation 97 4 Thera: The background 99 4.1 Introduction 99 4.1.1 The macro-context: the island 99 4.1.2 Settlement pattern 101 4.1.3 Agricultural production: past and present 103 4.1.4 Akrotiri: The micro-context 106 4.1.5 Discussion 137 5 Akrotiri: The palaeoethnobotany 139 5.1 Introduction 139 5.1.1 Choice of area studied 141 5.1.2 Choice of samples 142 5.1.3 Sampling methods 143 5.1.4 Plant remains 145 5.1.5 Insect infestation 168 5.1.6 Weeds and wild plants 168 5.1.7 Preservation by charring 170 5.1.8 Preservation by silicification 174 5.1.9 Preservation by mineralization 175 6 Akrotiri: Interpretation of palaeoethnobotanical data 176 6.1 Introduction 176 6.1.1 Background information 176 6.1.2 cf.
  • The Potter's Wheel at Phylakopi, Melos

    The Potter's Wheel at Phylakopi, Melos

    Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 26 (2007) 234–252 www.elsevier.com/locate/jaa Meaning in the making: The potter’s wheel at Phylakopi, Melos (Greece) Ina Berg ¤ Department of Archaeology, University of Manchester, School of Arts, Histories and Cultures, Humanities Bridgeford Street Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK Received 24 February 2006; revision received 28 September 2006 Available online 12 December 2006 Abstract It is now commonly accepted that technology is, to its very core, a social product through which we can explore cultural choices. This cultural dimension of technology will be examined with reference to the introduction and use of the potter’s wheel at Phylakopi on Melos (Greece) during the Late Bronze Age. At this site, the co-existence of two diVerent manufac- turing techniques was so deeply embedded that, despite the presence of hybrid vessels, many aspects of the pottery produc- tion had become linked to either a local (hand-built) or Minoanising (wheel-thrown) tradition. It will be argued that the traditional hand-building technique was associated with individual and rooted facets of the Melian identity (such as kin- ship, social class, or gender). Reasons for the initial stimulus for adoption of the potter’s wheel are considered to lie in its potential for competitive social practice through association with exotic, symbolically laden technologies, craft products and consumption rituals. The gradual application of the technology to ever more complex vessels, on the other hand, corre- sponds to the apprenticeship sequence outlined by Roux and Corbetta and may indicate an incomplete learning process or a certain lack of practice opportunities among local potters.
  • 4241-033: Sustainable Urban Transport Investment Program

    4241-033: Sustainable Urban Transport Investment Program

    Initial Environmental Examination November 2018 Project Number: 42414-033 GEO: Sustainable Urban Transport Investment Program – Tranche 2 Marshal Gelovani Avenue and Right Bank Intersection (SUTIP/C/QCBS-3) Prepared by the Municipal Development Fund of Georgia for the Government of Georgia and the Asian Development Bank. This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “terms of use” section on ADB’s website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. CONTRACT NO: SUTIP/C/QCBS-3 Detailed Design of Marshal Gelovani Avenue and Right Bank Intersection Initial Environmental Examination Prepared by: Ltd „Eo-“peti 7 Chavchvadze Ave, room 4 Phone: +995 322 90 44 22; Fax: +995 322 90 46 37 Web-site: www.eco-spectri.com November 2018 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 10 B. ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS, STANDARDSAND REGULATIONS ................................................. 21 B.1 Environmental Policies and Laws of Georgia ................................................................. 21 B.2
  • A Logical Break-Up of the Genus Telescopus Wagler, 1830 (Serpentes: Colubridae) Along Phylogenetic and Morphological Lines

    A Logical Break-Up of the Genus Telescopus Wagler, 1830 (Serpentes: Colubridae) Along Phylogenetic and Morphological Lines

    Australasian Journal of Herpetology 43 Australasian Journal of Herpetology 35:43-53. ISSN 1836-5698 (Print) Published 20 July 2017. ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) A logical break-up of the genus Telescopus Wagler, 1830 (Serpentes: Colubridae) along phylogenetic and morphological lines. RAYMOND T. HOSER 488 Park Road, Park Orchards, Victoria, 3134, Australia. Phone: +61 3 9812 3322 Fax: 9812 3355 E-mail: snakeman (at) snakeman.com.au Received 2 September 2016, Accepted 18 December 2016, Published 20 July 2017. ABSTRACT The Catsnake genus Telescopus Wagler, 1830 as currently understood includes a diverse assemblage of distantly related and morphologically similar snakes from south-west Asia, southern Europe and north, central and southern Africa. The various species groups are self-evidently morphologically and regionally distinct and so it is surprising that not all have been formally named in accordance with the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (Ride et al. 1999) or earlier codes. This paper breaks up the genus along logical lines, the result being as follows: Telescopus Wagler, 1830 (type species: Coluber obtusus Reuss, 1834) includes the North African assemblage commonly referred to in the literature as “the dhara-obtusus group”. Tarbophis Fleischmann, 1831 (type species: Tarbophis fallax Fleischmann, 1831) is treated as a subgenus of Telescopus and includes the species with a distribution centred on the Middle-east and nearby parts of southern Europe and south-west Asia. Ruivenkamporumus subgen. nov. is erected to accommodate two divergent species within Telescopus with a distribution centred on Pakistan and Iran. Elfakhariorumserpens gen. nov. is erected to accommodate the very different four described species-level taxa from south-west Africa, and another from sub-Saharan Africa, with Matsonserpens subgen.
  • Biodiversity Analysis Update for Armenia Final Report Prosperity, Livelihoods and Conserving Ecosystems (Place) Iqc Task Order #4

    Biodiversity Analysis Update for Armenia Final Report Prosperity, Livelihoods and Conserving Ecosystems (Place) Iqc Task Order #4

    BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS UPDATE FOR ARMENIA FINAL REPORT PROSPERITY, LIVELIHOODS AND CONSERVING ECOSYSTEMS (PLACE) IQC TASK ORDER #4 February 2009 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by the Armenia Biodiversity Update Team of ECODIT. ECODIT Contract #EPP-I-04-06-00010-00; Task Order #04 AUTHORITY Prepared for USAID/Armenia under Prosperity, Livelihoods and Conserving Ecosystems (PLACE) Indefinite Quantity Contract number EPP-I-04-06-00010-00, Task Order #04 awarded 14 November 2008, entitled Biodiversity Analysis Update for Armenia (“Armenia Biodiversity Update”). This “Armenia Biodiversity Update” was completed in reference to the task order. The views expressed and opinions contained in this report are those of the Armenia Biodiversity Assessment Team and are not intended as statements of policy of either USAID or the contractor. PREPARED BY: ARMENIA BIODIVERSITY UPDATE TEAM ASSEMBLED BY ECODIT, INC. ECODIT, Inc. 1800 N. Kent Street, Suite 1260 Arlington, VA 22209 USA Tel: +1 703 841 1883 Fax: +1 703 841 1885 Web: www.ecodit.com BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS UPDATE FOR ARMENIA – FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 17, 2009 ECODIT Contract #EPP-I-04-06-00010-00; Task Order #04 BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS UPDATE FOR ARMENIA FINAL REPORT PROSPERITY, LIVELIHOODS AND CONSERVING ECOSYSTEMS (PLACE) IQC TASK ORDER #4 DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS UPDATE FOR ARMENIA – FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 17, 2009 ECODIT Contract #EPP-I-04-06-00010-00; Task Order #04 [this page intentionally blank] BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS UPDATE FOR ARMENIA – FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 17, 2009 ECODIT Contract #EPP-I-04-06-00010-00; Task Order #04 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY his Biodiversity Analysis update responds to requirements of Section 119(d) of the FAA of 1961 (as T amended) and ADS 201.3.8.2 regarding biodiversity analysis for country strategic plans.