DOCSLIB.ORG

Mission Statement the Danish Refugee Council (DRC)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mission Statement the Danish Refugee Council (DRC) Mission Statement The Danish Refugee Council (DRC) is a Danish non governmental organization established in 1956. DRC is an umbrella organization for 30 member organizations with programs in 30 different countries, working for durable solutions for refugee and displaced populations. DRC has been operating in the Russian Federation since 1997. Objective 1 Objective 2 To support and build the capacity GOAL To promote and build the of local authorities and Protection and promotion of capacity of civil society, through institutions for planning, durable solutions to refugee LNGOs and other potential non- budgeting and delivering on their and displacement problems in governmental actors, to address ToRs as directly relevant for the North Caucasus, on the gaps in service provision and IDPs, i.e. assisting the practical basis of humanitarian entitlements. implementation of federal and principles and human rights republic legislation and policies. Objective 4 Objective 3 To advocate and help ensure the To promote and support the adherence to and protection of establishment of viable housing and socio-economic entitlements that livelihoods for integrating, returning are applicable and relevant to IDPs and resettling IDPs. and displacement situations. General Overview of the Programme The DRC North Caucasus (DRC NC) programme carries out a large assistance operation in partnership with the United Nations (UNHCR), EC's Humanitarian Aid department (ECHO), the governments of Norway (in partnership with NRC and the Norwegian Embassy) and Sweden (SIDA). DRC NC carries out activities in Chechnya, Ingushetia and North Ossetia and to a lesser degree in Dagestan. The DRC NC programme is implemented by the departments of Livelihood & Self-reliance (LSR) and Housing & Infrastructure (HI). These implementing departments are supported by a Finance and Administration department, Logistics & Procurement (LOG) department and by the Information & Analysis Department (IAD), which apart from registration and verification of activities also carries out legal aid assistance for IDPs and vulnerable recent returnees. 2, Karaeva Street Grozny, Chechnya Russian Federation 1 tel.: 8 (8712) 33 29 38 fax: 8 (8712) 33 29 37 Statistics and Characteristics of the Target Group Ingushetia As of December 31, 6,471 IDPs (1,591 HHs) from Chechnya’s second conflict displaced in Ingushetia were registered in the DRC/UNHCR database. The majority, 5,524 (1,326 HHs) of IDPs in Ingushetia live in the private accommodation, while 947 (265 HHs) reside in temporary settlements (TS). 1,450 belong to the vulnerable strata (which according to UNHCR criteria includes pregnant and lactating women, children under the age of three, the disabled, elderly people without adequate social support, orphans and children from single parent homes). IDPs in Ingushetia (DRC statistics as of December 31, 2010): Year of Birth 2005 or 2004 - 1997 – 1992 - 1950 or Total Percentage Gender later 1998 1993 1951 before Female 314 440 382 1 977 447 3 560 55,0% Male 260 459 329 1 622 241 2 911 45,0% Total 574 899 711 3 599 688 6 471 100,0% % 8,87% 13,89% 10,99% 55,62% 10,63% 100,0% Protection and Advocacy Chechnya In December, within the project for Information, Counselling and Legal Assistance (hereinafter as ICLA), DRC served 38 individuals. 30 individuals out of the total were assisted with legal advice on available social allowances. DRC does mobile visits directly to the hostels/TS and private accommodations in the area and to the beneficiaries referred to DRC by UNHCR and its implementing partners, as well as by various government entities. In December, DRC ICLA staff assisted 19 individuals with preparation of documents for state social payments, obtaining internal passports and housing privatization and advocated on behalf of 3 persons for accessing various government institutions for various entitlements. As a result of provided DRC ICLA, 18 individuals received access to different documents, various social payments and social services, 9 persons expect this access. According to agreements with DRC, «Nizam» and «Denal» provide ICLA to IDPs residing in the hostels/TSs in Chechnya and Ingushetia respectively. They also do the associated advocacy and capacity building of stakeholders and duty bearers to facilitate access of the target group to: identity, residence and status documentation; housing, land and property rights; social security and social welfare entitlements and other socio-economic entitlements, benefits and services. In December, «Nizam» was approached by total of 33 IDPs, providing 33 consultations on available social allowances, assisting 25 individuals with preparation of documents for state social payments, in obtaining internal passports and accessing housing/land rights, and 7 persons were advocated to get access to various government institutions. As a result of the legal aid provided by «Nizam», 8 individuals received access to different documents, various social payments and social services, 15 persons expect this access. In December, «Denal» was approached by total of 48 IDPs, 21 of them were assisted with legal advice, 24 individuals were assisted with preparation of documents for state payments and IDP status extension, and 7 persons were advocated to get access to various government institutions. As a result of the legal aid provided by «Denal», 14 individuals received access to different documents, various social payments and social services while 12 more people expect to get it. Ingushetia The DRC registration team in Ingushetia verified the residences of 306 IDP households in the temporary settlements. The activities presented above are funded by NRC/NMFA, SIDA and UNHCR. 2 Physical Rehabilitation Ingushetia Following the 2010 agreement with UNHCR, DRC is providing housing assistance to 20 IDP households from Chechnya and Prigorodny district, North Ossetia-Alania, permanently settling in Ingushetia. The amount of materials to be distributed will be sufficient for construction of a standard 48 m2 house. All 20 houses are to be constructed on a self-help principle, using materials distributed by DRC. By the end of December, all 20 beneficiary HHs have the roofs, windows and doors installed; timber for floors was distributed and most of the beneficiaries proceeded to the installation; 10 out of the 20 completed plastering works. There is a part of cutboard and materials for electrification in stock which will be distributed to the beneficiaries in January 2011. Additionally, the beneficiaries have been assisted with a set of sanitation equipment. Contractor for delivery and installation of the equipment was identified in December and will proceed to its installation in January 2011. Furthermore, the caseload will be assisted with individual heating systems (boiler, radiators, etc.) to help beneficiaries finish interior decoration works in winter time and speed up the process of occupation of the newly constructed housing. In December, DRC identified and contracted a company for delivery and installation of the appliances which will be distributed to the beneficiaries in January 2011. Chechnya In 2010, with the funds provided by UNHCR, DRC is providing housing assistance to 30 vulnerable IDPs and returnees in Chechnya. By the end of December, DRC finalized distribution of construction materials for 28 households. Out of the total number of beneficiaries, 28 finished bricklaying and installed roofs while 24 installed doors. (Please, see the earlier reports for the explanation for the other 2 HHs). Additionally, the caseload will be assisted with individual heating systems. In December, DRC identified and contracted a company for delivery and installation of the appliances which will be distributed to the beneficiaries in January 2011. Apart from permanent housing, UNHCR is funding provision of box-tents to returnee families in Chechnya, Prigorodny IDPs in North Ossetia and IDPs from Chechnya that decided to reside in Ingushetia permanently. The plan is to produce, distribute and install about 160 box-tents. The beneficiary lists are provided by UNHCR and verified by Vesta (UNHCR IP). In December, 9 more box-tents were distributed to the beneficiaries as follows: 8 in Chechnya and 1 in Ingushetia. By the end of December, the total number of box-tents installed reached 158. In early December 2010, UNHCR added distribution of additional 37 box-tents and accessories to its cooperation with DRC. As per the request from UNHCR, DRC is planning to complete installation of the 37 box-tents by the end of January 2011, reaching the overall result of 195 box-tents. The construction project funded by SIDA provides a number of turn-key and self-help houses for the most vulnerable IDPs and returnees residing in Chechnya. The number of houses constructed in 2010 is 21 comprising 13 self-help and 8 turn-key. Self-help: In December, DRC distributed the remaining construction materials (windows, doors and roofing board) to the beneficiaries. By the end of the month, 12 out of 13 HHs completed roof construction. Turn-key: 6 houses are completed and accommodated. DRC is in the process of contracting a construction company for the remaining 2 houses. As part of its SIDA-funded Community Development project, DRC is assisting in implementation of the following infrastructure projects, identified through the review of the community proposals submitted by numerous local administrations. · Rehabilitation of the bathhouse at the hostel on 4 Dudaeva St., Grozny, Chechnya: DRC identified and contracted
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Health Sector Field Directory
    HEALTH SECTOR FIELD DIRECTORY Republic of Chechnya Republic of Ingushetia Russian Federation June 2004 World Health Organization Nazran, Republic of Ingushetia TABLE OF CONTENTS ORGANIZATION 1. Agency for Rehabilitation and Development (ARD/Denal) 2. CARE Canada 3. Centre for Peacemaking and Community Development (CPCD) 4. Danish Refugee Council/Danish Peoples Aid (DRC/DPA) 5. Hammer FOrum e. V. 6. Handicap International 7. International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) 8. International Humanitarian Initiative (IHI) 9. International Medical Corps (IMC) 10. Islamic Relief (IR) 11. International Rescue Committee (IRC) 12. Medecins du Monde (MDM) 13. Medecins Sans Frontieres – Belgium (MSF-B) 14. Error! Reference source not found. 15. Medecins Sans Frontieres - Holland (MSF-H) 16. Medecins Sans Frontieres - Switzerland (MSF-CH) 17. Memorial 18. People in Need (PIN) 19. Polish Humanitarian Organisation (PHO) 20. Save the Generation 21. SERLO 22. UNICEF 23. World Vision 24. World Health Organization (WHO) 2 Agency for Rehabilitation and Development (ARD/Denal) Sector: Health; Food; Non-Food Items; Education Location: Chechnya and Ingushetia Objectives: To render psychosocial support to people affected by the conflict; to provide specialised medical services for women and medical aid for the IDP population; to support education and recreational activities; to supply supplementary food products to vulnerable IDP categories with specific nutritional needs; to provide basic hygienic items and clothes for new-born; to help the IDP community to establish a support system for its members making use of available resources. Beneficiaries: IDP children, youth, women and men in Ingushetia and residents in Chechnya Partners: UNICEF, SDC/SHA CONTACT INFORMATION: INGUSHETIA Moscow Karabulak, Evdoshenko St.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention
    Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by the Russian Federation for the period from 2001 to 2005 Moscow, May 2006 CONTENT Introduction .......................................................................................................................................4 Summary...........................................................................................................................................5 Article 2 ..........................................................................................................................................14 Measures taken to improve the conditions in detention facilities .............................................14 Measures to improve the situation in penal institutions and protection of prisoners’ human rights ..........................................................................................................................................15 Measures taken to improve the situation in temporary isolation wards of the Russian Ministry for Internal Affairs and other custodial places ..........................................................................16 Measures taken to prevent torture and cruel and depredating treatment in work of police and other law-enforcement institutions ............................................................................................16 Measures taken to prevent cruel treatment in the armed forces ................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention
    Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by the Russian Federation for the period from 2006 to 2012 October 2012, Moscow Этот материал выпущен МОО ПЦ "Мемориал", который внесен в реестр, предусмотренный ст. 13.1.10 ФЗ "Об НКО". Мы обжалуем это решение. Introduction This Joint Report on the Observance of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by the Russian Federation for the period from 2001 to 2005 was prepared jointly by the leading Russian NGOs, including: Public Verdict Foundation, Civic Assistance Committee, Memorial Human Rights Center, Soldiers' Mothers of Saint Petersburg, Independent Psychiatric Association, Interregional Committee against Torture, Human Rights Institute, Russian Justice Initiative (Utrecht), Legal Assistance Astreya (Moscow), Moscow office of the Penal Reform International, International Human Rights Youth Action, Krasnoyarsk Public Committee for Human Rights Protection, Center of Civic Education and Human Rights in Perm region. The Public Verdict Foundation was responsible for coordination of work over the Report. This Report is submitted to the UN Committee against Torture within the framework of its examination of the Russia's Fifth Periodic Report on implementation of the Convention against Torture. The Report is aimed at comprehensively tackling the issues of observing in Russia the rights enshrined in the Convention and at drawing the Committee experts’ attention to the most burning problems in the sphere of these rights realization, which have not been reflected in the Russian Federation Report. When working on the Report we did not strive to refute the official information and to confront the Russian Federation’s official position.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Federation -March 2003
    PROFILE OF INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT : RUSSIAN FEDERATION Compilation of the information available in the Global IDP Database of the Norwegian Refugee Council (as of 10 March, 2003) Also available at http://www.idpproject.org Users of this document are welcome to credit the Global IDP Database for the collection of information. The opinions expressed here are those of the sources and are not necessarily shared by the Global IDP Project or NRC Norwegian Refugee Council/Global IDP Project Chemin Moïse Duboule, 59 1209 Geneva - Switzerland Tel: + 41 22 799 07 00 Fax: + 41 22 799 07 01 E-mail : [email protected] CONTENTS CONTENTS 1 PROFILE SUMMARY 8 CHECHENS PRESSED TO GO HOME 8 CAUSES AND BACKGROUND OF DISPLACEMENT 13 THE CONFLICTS IN CHECHNYA 13 BACKGROUND TO THE CONFLICT: CHECHNYA RECENT HISTORY (1922-1998) 13 THE MILITARY OPERATIONS IN DAGESTAN AND CHECHNYA (SEPTEMBER 1999 - MARCH 2000) 15 VIOLATIONS OF HUMANITARIAN LAW BY THE FEDERAL FORCES HAS LED DIRECTLY TO THE DISPLACEMENT OF THE CIVILIAN POPULATION (1999-2000) 17 INSECURITY AND VIOLENCE HAMPER GOVERNMENT'S PLANS OF NORMALIZATION IN CHECHNYA (2000-2002) 18 CIVILIAN POPULATION IN CHECHNYA ALSO EXPOSED TO VIOLENCE FROM THE CHECHEN REBEL GROUPS (2000-2002) 20 REVIEW OF POPULATION MOVEMENTS BETWEEN CHECHNYA AND INGUSHETIA (SEPTEMBER 1999-DECEMBER 2000) 21 VIOLENCE AND INSECURITY CONTINUE TO TRIGGER DISPLACEMENT IN CHECHNYA AND INGUSHETIA (2001-2002) 23 OTHER CAUSES OF DISPLACEMENT 24 ETHNIC RUSSIAN POPULATION LEAVE NORTH CAUCASIAN REPUBLICS IN A CONTEXT OF ETHNIC ANTAGONISMS 25 DISPLACEMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S824
    S824 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE February 24, 2000 Constabulary have been put forth. adequate health care services for uninsured trillion surplus to provide people with Cross border institutions have been es- populations, serving over 4,500,000 uninsured health insurance. tablished and are functioning. patients in 1999, including over 1,000,000 new The third thing these plans have in They must abide by their obligations uninsured patients who have sought care common—and perhaps the most impor- from such centers in the last 3 years; as well. Mr. President, Sinn Fein and Whereas health centers care for nearly tant thing—is that they probably have the IRA must understand that if they 7,000,000 minorities, nearly 600,000 farm- little chance of becoming law this do not, they will not have the support workers, and more than 500,000 homeless in- year. Whether because of policy dif- of the United States. dividuals each year; ferences or political differences, it’s Today I am offering a resolution Whereas health centers provide cost-effec- just not likely that they will pass. stressing the importance of decommis- tive comprehensive primary and preventive So today, we’re launching a bipar- sioning to the success of the peace in care to uninsured individuals for less than tisan effort—called the REACH Initia- Northern Ireland and calling on the $1.00 per day, or $350 annually, and help to tive—that does have a chance this reduce the inappropriate use of costly emer- year. There’s no need to wait for an IRA to commit to the process and to gency rooms and inpatient hospital care; offer a timetable as to when they will Whereas current resources only allow election—we can do it now.
    [Show full text]
  • Social & Behavioural Sciences SCTCMG 2019 International
    The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS ISSN: 2357-1330 https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.12.04.174 SCTCMG 2019 International Scientific Conference «Social and Cultural Transformations in the Context of Modern Globalism» PREREQUISITES AND CONDITIONS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF PRIVATIZATION MECHANISM OF REGIONAL INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISES Lalita Idigova (a, c)*, Sultan Tagaev (d), Tamila Tasueva (d), Hussein Chaplaev (e), Kazbek Mazhiev (a, d), Aslan Mazhiev (a, b) *Corresponding author (a) Kh. Ibragimov Complex Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 21a, Staropromyslovskoye Highway St., Grozny, 364051, Russia [email protected], 7(8712) 22-26-28 (b) Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic, 13, M. Esambaev Avenue, Grozny, 364051, Russia [email protected], 7(8712) 22-26-76 (c) Chechen State University, 32, Sheripov St., Grozny, 364907, Russia, [email protected], 7(8712) 29-00-04 (d) Grozny State Oil Technical University named after Academician M. D. Millionshchikov, 100, Ordzhonikidze Square, Grozny, [email protected], 7(8712) 22-36-07 (e) Chechen State Pedagogical University, 62, Kh. Isaev Ave., Grozny, 364068, Russia [email protected], 7(8712) 22-43-01 Abstract The paper is devoted to the analysis of the privatization activity of the industrial enterprises in the Chechen Republic over 2013-2018. The authors noted that the importance of the privatization covers the change of the form and entity of freehold interest in the property, transfer of state property to citizens and legal entities, that is, to private property. Thus, according to the authors, there is a layer of new owners, and the state is freed from costs on maintenance and management of inefficient production.
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE February 24
    February 24, 2000 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE 1549 There is no limit to what TRIO par- spite the best efforts of the hardline yearning for change, as witnessed by ticipants can accomplish. Program clerical institutions to disqualify and the vote this week—including their graduates have become successful in intimidate popular candidates, the Ira- peaceful yet brutalized Baha’is commu- all spheres of society and have gone on nian people had the courage of their nity. I ask for their freedom to express to enjoy careers as doctors, lawyers, convictions. They want economic liber- their faith as they see fit. astronauts, television reporters, ac- alization, they want freedom of the Our resolution is in addition to the tors, state politicians and Members of press, and they want personal liberty. bill that passed earlier today. It con- Congress, to list a few. Indeed, two of We in the United States obviously gratulates the Iranian people and says: our colleagues in the House of Rep- share those convictions and are obvi- Let’s take other steps forward. No resentatives, Representative HENRY ously heartened by what took place at weapons of mass destruction. But, also, BONILLA and Representative ALBERT R. the polls this week in Iran. It should be let’s recognize religious freedom, as in WYNN are graduates of the TRIO Pro- noted and applauded, and this resolu- the Universal Declaration of Human grams. tion does just that. Rights, which the Iranian Government I have long supported TRIO and will We say to the Iranian people: Con- has signed on to. continue to push for increased funding gratulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S825
    February 24, 2000 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S825 residents, one out of every 6 low-in- munized to protect her from a variety denounced Moscow’s handling of Babitsky as come children, and one of every 5 ba- of dreaded diseases. a violation of Russian law and international bies born to low-income families. These individuals, and millions more law and stated that the situation sur- 3. Health centers truly target the like them, are the reasons why we rounding Babitsky signals ‘‘that the same must make the goal of the REACH Ini- thing may happen to every reporter’’; health care access problem. By defini- Whereas the Union of Journalists in Russia tion, health centers must be located in tiative—doubled funding for commu- declared on February 16 that the case of ‘‘medically underserved’’ commu- nity health centers—a reality. Andrei Babitsky is ‘‘not an isolated episode, nities—which simply means places f but almost a turning point in the struggle where people have serious problems SENATE RESOLUTION 261—EX- for a press that serves society and not the getting access to health care. So health authorities’’ and that ‘‘the threat to freedom PRESSING THE SENSE OF THE of speech in Russia has for the first time in centers attack the problem right at SENATE REGARDING THE DE- this source. Unlike other health care the last several years transformed into its TENTION OF ANDREI BABITSKY open and regular suppression’’; proposals, the REACH Initiative BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE Whereas freedom of the press is both a cen- doesn’t create problems of ‘‘crowding RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND tral element of democracy as well as a cata- out’’ private insurance by replacing FREEDOM OF THE PRESS IN lyst for democratic reform; private dollars spent on health insur- RUSSIA Whereas the Government of the Russian ance with federal dollars.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideology, Image-Making and the Media in Putin's Russia
    Ideology, Image-making and the Media in Putin's Russia. A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF PhD IN RUSSIAN IN THE UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY BY GREGORY J. SIMONS University of Canterbury 2004 L ?_(:1t l )t INDEX. LIST OF ABREVIATIONS ... v GLOSSARY ... VI ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ... Vll ABSTRACT ... Vll INTRODUCTION. ... 1 CHAPTER 0: THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR THE THESIS. 0.0 Chapter Objectives ... 14 0.1 Media Theory ... 14 0.1.1 The Significance of the Mass Media ... 14 0.1.2 Social Functions of the Media ... 15 0.1.3 Requirements for Freedom of the Press ... 16 0.1.4 Political Communication ... 17 0.2 Critical Theory ... 20 0.3 Semiotics ... 22 0.4 Ideology ... 23 0.5 Jean Baudrillard' s Theories of Simulation and Simulacra ... 27 0.6 Image Theory ... 30 0.7 TV and Power ... 32 0.8 Making the News ... 36 0.9 Chapter Summary ... 39 CHAPTER I: VLADIMIR PUTIN AND THE DEBATE ON THE EMERGENCE OF CULT OF PERSONALITY. 1.0 Chapter Objectives. ...41 1.1 Definition of Cult of Personality. .. 42 I 1.2 Cult of Personality in the Soviet Union. ... 45 1.3 Does a 'Cult of Putin' Really Exist? ... 49 1.3.1 Creating Putin. ... 50 1.3.2 Creating an 'Acceptable' Public Personality. ... 51 1.3.3 Reinforcing the Image. ... 52 1.3.4 Putin's Initial Public Profile: A Summary. ... 59 1.3.5 Putin: The Passionate Lover of Literature. ... 60 1.3.6 Putin For Sale: The Industry Dealing in Putin Paraphernalia. ... 61 1.3.7 Cultural Putin: Art and Culture Dedicated to Putin.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf | 982.39 Kb
    Assistance Activities in Chechnya by Sector Summer 2006 Nadterechny district Naursky district Shelkovskoy district Kalmykiya Agency Sectors Agency Sectors Agency Sectors NORTH CAUCASUS Yuzhno-Sukhokumsk AV PT AV PT Stavropolsky kray AV PT Nogaiskiy Pyatigorsk Kochubei To Mineralnye Vody Stavropolsky kray Berkat E Berkat E Berkat E Kislovodsk Tarumovskiy Prokhladnenskiy Rayon Kizlyarskiy ICRC WS CPCD H Karachaevo- Malka Mozdoksky Rayon Mozdok ICRC WS Kizlyar St.Terek Prokhladny Naursky Rayon Cherkessia Pavlodollskaya Isherskaya Kamennomostskoe Baksan Naurskaya Zol’skiy Rayon Mayskiy Rayon Baksanskiy Rayon Terek IR FSA ICRC WS Znamenskoe Shelkovskoy Rayon Maisky Terskiy Rayon Nadterechny Rayon IR FSA Nalchik Terek El’bruskiy Rayon Nartkala Shelkovskaya Malgobek Chervlennaya Goragorsk Spartak Bylym Babayurtovskiy Urvanskiy Rayon Verkhnij Kurp Psedakh Chechnya C a s p i a n Kabardino- Malgobeksky Rayon IR FSA Mou t.M usa kai Groznensky Rayon MSF-H H 872 Tyrnyauz Pervomayskaya 777 kiy Moutain ridge Sunzhens Airport “Grozny” (Severny) MSF-H H Srednie 658 Airport “Magas” Sunzhensky Balkariya Achaluki Kirovski Rayon Rayon Gudermes Dagestan Karabulak Sleptsovskaya Sernovodsk Staraya Khasav-Yurtovskiy Nazranovsky Rayon Grozny Sunzha Argun Elkhotovo Plievo Troitskaya Kavkaz/Adler Gudermessky Rayon Chegemskiy Rayon Cherekskiy Rayon Pravoberezhny Nesterovskaya Noybera Khasav-Yurt Nazranovsky Nazran Achkhoi-Martanovsky Gerzel Rayon Kantyishevo MSF-H H municipal okrug Assinovskaya Sulak Zhemtala Airport “Beslan” Rayon Bachi-Yurt S e a NI PT Digora Kurchaloy
    [Show full text]
  • Commdh(2010)55 Or
    CommDH(2010)55 Or. Russian Comments of the Russian Federation on the Report by Thomas Hammarberg, Commissioner for Human Rights of the Council of Europe, following his visit to the Russian Federation on 2-11 September 2009 I. Introduction II. General provisions III. Human rights situation in the Chechen Republic 1. Situation of human rights defenders 2. Counter-terrorism measures 3. Abductions and disappearances 4. Combating impunity IV. Human rights situation in the Republic of Ingushetia 1. Counter-terrorism measures 2. Situation of human rights defenders 3. Situation of Internally Displaced Persons Annex 1 Annex 2 2 I. Introduction The Report by the Commissioner for Human Right of the Council of Europe has been developed following his visit to the Chechen Republic and the Republic of Ingushetia as a part of his visit to the Russian Federation on 2-11 September 2009. Human rights situation in the North Caucasus is an object of constant concern and attention on the part of the Commissioner for Human Right of the Council of Europe. Earlier, T. Hammarberg, like his predecessor A. Gil-Robles, has more than once visited the North Caucasus: in February 2006, February to March 2007, April 2008. In the course of his visit to the Russian Federation on 2-11 September 2009 the Commissioner met with the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, S.V. Lavrov, and the Minister of Justice of the Russian Federation, A.V. Konovalov. He also held discussions with the Ombudsman of the Russian Federation, V.P. Lukin, the Chairperson of the Council on Civil Society Institutions and Human Rights under the President of the Russian Federation, E.A.
    [Show full text]
  • “Counterterrorism Operation” by the Russian Federation in the Northern Caucasus Throughout 1999-2006
    “Counterterrorism Operation” by the Russian Federation in the Northern Caucasus throughout 1999-2006 Brief overview by the Human Rights Center "Memorial” and Center "Demos": Submitted to the Eminent Jurists Panel in January 2007 in connection with high level public hearings on terrorism, counterterrorism and human rights in Russia 1. Introduction. 2. Conflict Development Background and History. Chechenization of the Conflict 3. Legal Framework 4. The First Stage of the Conflict - Nonselective Use of Force 5. Deliberate Attacks on Peaceful Population 6. "Special Operations [zachistka]” 7. Inhuman Treatment of Detained, Arrested and Kept in Custody Persons 7.1. Filtration System. 7.2. Illegal Prisons Today 7.3. Torture 8. “Disappearances” of People. Arbitrary Executions 9. Taking Insurgents’ Relatives Hostage, Repressive Acts against Insurgents’ Relatives 10. Impunity of Perpetrators 1. Introduction. Terrorism has become a grave threat in modern Russia. To protect the rights and freedoms of its citizens the state has not only the right but also an obligation to put up an effective fight against terrorism. However, the actions undertaken by Russia’s authorities in the Chechen Republic and Northern Caucasus since autumn 1999 under the banner of struggle against terrorism cannot be defined as a counterterrorism operation (CTO). The ways the top management and military agencies of the country use force have transformed the CTO into criminal acts resulting in mass victims and outrageous violations of human rights. It should be noted, though, that throughout the period of 1996-99, the heads of the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria (ChRI) proved to be unable to ensure safety and civil rights on the territory under their administration.
    [Show full text]