Чеченская Республика the Chechen Republic
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Download Article
Advances in Engineering Research, volume 177 International Symposium on Engineering and Earth Sciences (ISEES 2018) Unique Natural Objects of Mountain Landscapes of the Chechen Republic Zaburayeva Kh.Sh. Gatsayeva L.S. Department of Geology, Geophysics and Geoecology Department of Geology, Geophysics and Geoecology Complex Research Institute named after Kh.I. Ibragimov, Complex Research Institute named Kh.I. Ibragimov, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russian Academy of Sciences Institute of Oil and Gas Grozny, Russia Grozny State Oil Technical University [email protected] named M.D. Millionshchikov Grozny, Russia [email protected] Gayrabekov U.T. Dzhabrailov S.-E.M. Department of Geology, Geophysics and Geoecology Faculty of Geography and Geoecology Complex Research Institute named Kh.I. Ibragimov, Chechen State University Russian Academy of Sciences, Grozny, Russia Faculty of Geography and Geoecology [email protected] Chechen State University Grozny, Russia [email protected] Daukayev Asl.A. Sediyeva M.B. Department of Geology, Geophysics and Geoecology Department of Geology, Geophysics and Geoecology Complex Research Institute named Kh.I. Ibragimov, Complex Research Institute named after Kh.I. Ibragimov, Russian Academy of Sciences Russian Academy of Sciences Department of Earth Sciences Grozny, Russia Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic [email protected] Grozny, Russia [email protected] Abumuslimova I.A. Department of Biological and Medical Studies Academy of Sciences of the Chechen Republic Grozny, Russia indira_anChechen [email protected] -
Health Sector Field Directory
HEALTH SECTOR FIELD DIRECTORY Republic of Chechnya Republic of Ingushetia Russian Federation June 2004 World Health Organization Nazran, Republic of Ingushetia TABLE OF CONTENTS ORGANIZATION 1. Agency for Rehabilitation and Development (ARD/Denal) 2. CARE Canada 3. Centre for Peacemaking and Community Development (CPCD) 4. Danish Refugee Council/Danish Peoples Aid (DRC/DPA) 5. Hammer FOrum e. V. 6. Handicap International 7. International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) 8. International Humanitarian Initiative (IHI) 9. International Medical Corps (IMC) 10. Islamic Relief (IR) 11. International Rescue Committee (IRC) 12. Medecins du Monde (MDM) 13. Medecins Sans Frontieres – Belgium (MSF-B) 14. Error! Reference source not found. 15. Medecins Sans Frontieres - Holland (MSF-H) 16. Medecins Sans Frontieres - Switzerland (MSF-CH) 17. Memorial 18. People in Need (PIN) 19. Polish Humanitarian Organisation (PHO) 20. Save the Generation 21. SERLO 22. UNICEF 23. World Vision 24. World Health Organization (WHO) 2 Agency for Rehabilitation and Development (ARD/Denal) Sector: Health; Food; Non-Food Items; Education Location: Chechnya and Ingushetia Objectives: To render psychosocial support to people affected by the conflict; to provide specialised medical services for women and medical aid for the IDP population; to support education and recreational activities; to supply supplementary food products to vulnerable IDP categories with specific nutritional needs; to provide basic hygienic items and clothes for new-born; to help the IDP community to establish a support system for its members making use of available resources. Beneficiaries: IDP children, youth, women and men in Ingushetia and residents in Chechnya Partners: UNICEF, SDC/SHA CONTACT INFORMATION: INGUSHETIA Moscow Karabulak, Evdoshenko St. -
Information for Persons Who Wish to Seek Asylum in the Russian Federation
INFORMATION FOR PERSONS WHO WISH TO SEEK ASYLUM IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION “Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in the other countries asylum from persecution”. Article 14 Universal Declaration of Human Rights I. Who is a refugee? According to Article 1 of the Federal Law “On Refugees”, a refugee is: “a person who, owing to well‑founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership of particular social group or politi‑ cal opinion, is outside the country of his nationality and is unable or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to avail himself of the protection of that country”. If you consider yourself a refugee, you should apply for Refugee Status in the Russian Federation and obtain protection from the state. If you consider that you may not meet the refugee definition or you have already been rejected for refugee status, but, nevertheless you can not re‑ turn to your country of origin for humanitarian reasons, you have the right to submit an application for Temporary Asylum status, in accordance to the Article 12 of the Federal Law “On refugees”. Humanitarian reasons may con‑ stitute the following: being subjected to tortures, arbitrary deprivation of life and freedom, and access to emergency medical assistance in case of danger‑ ous disease / illness. II. Who is responsible for determining Refugee status? The responsibility for determining refugee status and providing le‑ gal protection as well as protection against forced return to the country of origin lies with the host state. Refugee status determination in the Russian Federation is conducted by the Federal Migration Service (FMS of Russia) through its territorial branches. -
HUMANITARIAN AID for the Victims of the Chechnya Conflict in the Caucasus
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR HUMANITARIAN AID - ECHO HUMANITARIAN AID for the victims of the Chechnya conflict in the Caucasus GLOBAL PLAN 2007 Humanitarian Aid Committee – December 2006 ECHO/-EE/BUD/2007/01000 1 Table of contents Explanatory Memorandum page 1) Executive summary..................................................................................... 3 2) Context and situation.................................................................................. 3 2.1.) General Context.................................................................................... 3 2.2.) Current Situation.................................................................................. 4 3) Identification and assessment of humanitarian needs.............................. 5 4) Proposed DG ECHO strategy....................................................................... 8 4.1.) Coherence with DG ECHO´s overall strategic priorities.................... 8 4.2.) Impact of previous humanitarian response......................................... 9 4.3.) Coordination with activities of other donors and institutions............ 10 4.4.) Risk assessment and assumptions........................................................ 10 4.5.) DG ECHO Strategy.................................................................................11 4.6.) Duration............................................................................................. 12 4.7.) Amount of decision and strategic programming matrix..................... 13 5) Evaluation............................................................................................. -
From Ethiopia to Chechnya François Jean
François From Jean Ethiopia to Chechnya Reflections on Humanitarian Action 1988-1999 Reflections on Humanitarian Action 1988-1999 Edited by Kevin P.Q. Phelan Translated by Richard Swanson Franços From Jean Ethopa to Chechnya Reflections on Humanitarian Action 1988-1999 Edited by Kevin P.Q. Phelan Translated by Richard Swanson Copyediting by Nicole Lisa The Médecins Sans Frontières Charter Contents Médecins Sans Frontières/Doctors Without Borders (MSF) offers assis- iv Preface tance to populations in distress, victims of natural or man-made disasters, v Introduction and victims of armed conflict, without discrimination and irrespective of race, religion, creed, or political affiliation. Secton One MSF observes strict neutrality and impartiality in the name of universal medical ethics and the right to humanitarian assistance, and demands Famne full and unhindered freedom in the exercise of its functions. 2 Famine and Ideology (1988) 13 Ethiopia: A Political Famine (1988) MSF volunteers undertake to observe their professional code of ethics 24 North Korea: A Famine Regime (1999) and to maintain complete independence from all political, economic, and religious powers. Volunteers are aware of the risks and dangers of the missions they under- Secton Two take and have no right to compensation for themselves or their beneficia- Conflct ries other than that which MSF is able to afford them. 50 Security: How Do We Know When Not to Go Too Far? (1991) 53 Have You Heard About Somalia? (1992) 56 The Sudanese Conflict (1993) 59 What Role for MSF? (1993) -
Laws in Conflict: Legacies of War and Legal Pluralism in Chechnya
Laws in Conflict: Legacies of War and Legal Pluralism in Chechnya Egor Lazarev Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2018 © 2018 Egor Lazarev All rights reserved ABSTRACT Laws in Conflict: Legacies of War and Legal Pluralism in Chechnya Egor Lazarev This dissertation explores how the social and political consequences of armed conflict affect legal pluralism; specifically, the coexistence of Russian state law, Sharia, and customary law in Chechnya. The study draws on qualitative and quantitative data gathered during seven months of fieldwork in Chechnya. The data include over one hundred semistructured interviews with legal authorities and religious and traditional leaders; an original survey of the population; and a novel dataset of all civil and criminal cases heard in state courts. First, the dissertation argues that armed conflict disrupted traditional social hierarchies in Chechnya, which paved the way for state penetration into Chechen society. The conflict particularly disrupted gender hierarchies. As a result of the highly gendered nature of the conflict, women in Chechnya became breadwinners in their families and gained experience in serving important social roles, most notably as interlocutors between communities and different armed groups. This change in women’s bargaining power within households and increase in their social status came into conflict with the patriarchal social order, which was based on men’s rigid interpretations of religious and customary norms. In response, women started utilizing the state legal system, a system that at least formally acknowledges gender equality, in contrast to customary law and Sharia. -
1222 RUS Khashiyev H/Exec Disappearance Cases
DIRECTORATE GENERAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND RULE OF LAW DIRECTORATE OF HUMAN RIGHTS DEPARTMENT FOR THE EXECUTION OF JUDGMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS H/Exec(2015)5 rev – 20 August 2015 ——————————————— Khashiyev and Akayeva v. Russian Federation (No. 57942/00) group of cases Overview of the Court’s judgments concerning enforced disappearances in the North Caucasus Memorandum prepared by the Department for the Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights ——————————————— The opinions expressed in this document are binding on neither the Committee of Ministers nor the European Court. This document contains an overview of the judgments delivered by the European Court against the Russian Federation concerning enforced disappearances in the North Caucasus between 1999 and 2006 (Khashiyev and Akayeva group of cases). It also indicates the fate of the disappeared persons, where known, at the time of the examination by the European Court. 1 http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/execution/ 2 Case name Disappeared Facts as established by the Criminal investigation file, as Fate of disappeared persons Violations Application no. persons (name Court noted in the Court’s judgment as indicated in the Court’s found Date of definitive and year of birth) judgments (where known) judgment Bazorkina Mr Khadzhi-Murat The applicant’s son was Case no. 19112 opened on 14 July Unknown. Art. 2 69481/01 Yandiyev (1975) detained on 2 February 2000 2001 by the Chechnya Prosecutor’s (substantive 11/12/2006 by State servicemen during a Office under Article 126 § 2 of the and counter-terrorist operation in Criminal Code (aggravated procedural), the village of Alkhan-Kala kidnapping). -
Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention
Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by the Russian Federation for the period from 2001 to 2005 Moscow, May 2006 CONTENT Introduction .......................................................................................................................................4 Summary...........................................................................................................................................5 Article 2 ..........................................................................................................................................14 Measures taken to improve the conditions in detention facilities .............................................14 Measures to improve the situation in penal institutions and protection of prisoners’ human rights ..........................................................................................................................................15 Measures taken to improve the situation in temporary isolation wards of the Russian Ministry for Internal Affairs and other custodial places ..........................................................................16 Measures taken to prevent torture and cruel and depredating treatment in work of police and other law-enforcement institutions ............................................................................................16 Measures taken to prevent cruel treatment in the armed forces ................................................17 -
Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention
Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by the Russian Federation for the period from 2006 to 2012 October 2012, Moscow Этот материал выпущен МОО ПЦ "Мемориал", который внесен в реестр, предусмотренный ст. 13.1.10 ФЗ "Об НКО". Мы обжалуем это решение. Introduction This Joint Report on the Observance of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by the Russian Federation for the period from 2001 to 2005 was prepared jointly by the leading Russian NGOs, including: Public Verdict Foundation, Civic Assistance Committee, Memorial Human Rights Center, Soldiers' Mothers of Saint Petersburg, Independent Psychiatric Association, Interregional Committee against Torture, Human Rights Institute, Russian Justice Initiative (Utrecht), Legal Assistance Astreya (Moscow), Moscow office of the Penal Reform International, International Human Rights Youth Action, Krasnoyarsk Public Committee for Human Rights Protection, Center of Civic Education and Human Rights in Perm region. The Public Verdict Foundation was responsible for coordination of work over the Report. This Report is submitted to the UN Committee against Torture within the framework of its examination of the Russia's Fifth Periodic Report on implementation of the Convention against Torture. The Report is aimed at comprehensively tackling the issues of observing in Russia the rights enshrined in the Convention and at drawing the Committee experts’ attention to the most burning problems in the sphere of these rights realization, which have not been reflected in the Russian Federation Report. When working on the Report we did not strive to refute the official information and to confront the Russian Federation’s official position. -
Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention
Russian NGO Shadow Report on the Observance of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by the Russian Federation for the period from 2012 to 2018 June, Moscow 2018 This Joint Report on the Observance of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment by the Russian Federation for the period from 2012 to 2018 was prepared jointly by the leading Russian NGOs, including: Public Verdict Foundation, Civic Assistance Committee, Memorial Human Rights Center, OVD-info, Soldiers' Mothers of Saint Petersburg, Independent Psychiatric Association, Human Rights Institute, Stichting Justice Initiative, STAKS Expert and Legal Group, Psychologists for civil society, Citizens Commission on Human Rights in Russia, Urals Human Rights Group, Legal Basis Association, Interregional Center of Human Rights, Memorial Anti- Discrimination Center, Social Partnership Foundation, Russia behind the bars, the Foundation "In defense of the rights of prisoners", Movement for Human Rights and experts: Natalya Lutaya, former member of Kaliningrad Public Oversight Commission and Lyudmila Alpern, former member of Moscow Public Oversight Commission. The Public Verdict Foundation was responsible for coordination of work over the Report, systematizing and editing the Report materials. This Report is submitted to the UN Committee against Torture within the framework of its examination of the Russia's Sixth Periodic Report on implementation of the Convention against Torture. The Report is aimed at comprehensively tackling the issues of observing in Russia the rights enshrined in the Convention and at drawing the Committee experts‘ attention to the most burning problems in the sphere of these rights realization, which have not been reflected in the Russian Federation Report. -
On the Situation of Residents of Chechnya in the Russian Federation
MEMORIAL Human Rights Center Migration Rights Network Edited by Svetlana A. Gannushkina On the Situation of Residents of Chechnya in the Russian Federation August 2006 – October 2007 Moscow 2007 1 Этот материал выпущен МОО ПЦ "Мемориал", который внесен в реестр, предусмотренный ст. 13.1.10 ФЗ "Об НКО". Мы обжалуем это решение. The project is funded by the European Commission Based on the materials gathered by the Migration Rights Network, Memorial Human Rights Center, Civic Assistance Committee, Internet Publication Caucasian Knot, SOVA Information and Analysis Center, and others S.A. Gannushkina, Head of the Migration Rights Network, Chairwoman of the Civic Assistance Committee L.Sh. Simakova, compiler of the Report Other contributors to the Report included: E. Burtina, S. Magomedov, Sh. Tangiyev, N. Estemirova The Migration Rights Network of Memorial Human Rights Center has 56 offices providing free legal assistance to forced migrants, including five offices located in Chechnya and Ingushetia (www.refugee.memo.ru). In Moscow lawyers from the Migration Rights Network use the charitable Civic Assistance Committee for Refugee Aid as their base (www.refugee.ru). ISBN 978-5-93439-246-9 Distributed free of charge 2 Этот материал выпущен МОО ПЦ "Мемориал", который внесен в реестр, предусмотренный ст. 13.1.10 ФЗ "Об НКО". Мы обжалуем это решение. CONTENTS I. Introduction............................................................................................................5 II. Svetlana Gannushkina’s speech at the seminar for administrative law judges in Hohenheim, Germany (November 25, 2006): Chechen refugees and the EU qualification rules....................................................................................................6 III. Living conditions and security situation of internally displaced persons and residents of the Chechen Republic......................................................................18 IV. Situation of people from Chechnya in the Republic of Ingushetia......................42 V. -
Pdf | 129.39 Kb
Memorial Human Rights Center 127051 Russia, Moscow, Malyj Karetnyj per. 12 tel. (495) 225-31-18 Web-site: http://www.memo.ru/ Report for the next round of consultations on Human Rights European Union – Russia The situation in the conflict zone of the North Caucasus June 2009 – October 2009 Moscow 2009 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………..…..1 Activization of armed underground………………………………………………….……2 The reaction of the governmental authorities………………………………….…………3 Human Rights activists under attack…………………………………………….………..3 Ingushetia………………………………………………………………………….…….…..5 Dagestan…………………………………………………………………………….……….7 Chechnya……………………………………………………………………….……………8 Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights……………………………………..10 Recommendations…………………………………………………………………………11 Introduction The North Caucasus remains one of Russia's least prosperous regions in the field of human rights. Although the situation in various republics and regions of the North Caucasus differs remarkably, some general factors, spread over a large territory of the North Caucasus adversely influence the development of the situation. These are: − the ongoing fighting. Right now armed underground forces, using terroristic methods, oppose the Russian state on the North Caucasus. The power structures, in turn, implement a politics of state terror; − the impunity for mass crimes, committed by state representatives during a "counterterrorist operation". This way, the fate of the absolute majority of thousands of people, that have forcibly "vanished" on the territory of Chechnya since 2000, has not been established. The database of the HRC "Memorial" contains more than three thousand cases on those kind of forced "disappearances", and no one has so far been punished for these crimes; − the corruption, whose level is high even against the background of the rest of Russia; − the arbitrariness of the officials; − a high unemployment rate; – the conflict between the supporters of the "traditional" Islam for the North Caucasus and the relatively new, fundamental Salafism movement of Islam.