DOCSLIB.ORG

Phase I Archaeological Survey Along KY 3376 in Madison County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Phase I Archaeological Survey Along KY 3376 in Madison County Contract Publication Series 13-252 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR THE PROPOSED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AND APPROACH MODIFICATION ALONG KY 3376 OVER HAYS FORK IN MADISON COUNTY, KENTUCKY (ITEM NO. 7-1126.00) by Michael J. Curran Prepared for Prepared by Kentucky West Virginia Ohio Wyoming Illinois Indiana Louisiana Tennessee Utah Virginia Colorado Contract Publication Series 13-252 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR THE PROPOSED BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AND APPROACH MODIFICATION ALONG KY 3376 OVER HAYS FORK IN MADISON COUNTY, KENTUCKY (ITEM NO. 7-1126.00) by Michael J. Curran With contributions by Lisa J. Kelley and Jennifer M. Price Prepared for David Waldner Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Division of Environmental Analysis 200 Mero Street Frankfort, Kentucky 40622 Phone: (502) 564-7250 Fax: (502) 564-5655 Prepared by Cultural Resource Analysts, Inc. 151 Walton Avenue Lexington, Kentucky 40508 Phone: (859) 252-4737 Fax: (859) 254-3747 Email: [email protected] CRA Project No.: K13K005 __________________________ ________________________ Charles M. Niquette, RPA Alexandra D. Bybee, RPA Co-Principal Investigator Co-Principal Investigator September 16, 2013 Lead Agency: Federal Highway Administration Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Item Number 7-1126.00 OSA Project Registration No.: FY14_7736 ABSTRACT On August 13, 2013, Cultural Resource Analysts, Inc., personnel conducted an archaeological survey of a proposed bridge replacement and approach modification along KY 3376 over Hays Fork Creek in Madison County, Kentucky. The survey was conducted at the request of David Waldner of the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (Item No. 7-1126.00). A records review was conducted at the Office of State Archaeology. The review indicated that no archaeological sites or investigations had been documented within the project area. The project area is located on the northwest side of KY 3376 and extends from the intersection of KY 3376 and U.S. 421 approximately 195 m (640 ft) to the southwest, covering .39 ha (.97 acres). The fieldwork consisted of an intensive pedestrian survey supplemented by screened shovel testing and bucket augering, and the project area was surveyed in its entirety. One new cultural resource (15Ma499) was recorded as a result of this survey. Site 15Ma499 is a historic farm/residence dating from the late nineteenth through the twentieth centuries. The portion of the site within the project boundary is not considered to have the potential to provide important information about local or regional history, and Site 15Ma499 is recommended as not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion D. No further work for this portion of the site is recommended. No cultural resources recommended eligible for listing, or listed, on the National Register of Historic Places will be affected by the proposed project, and archaeological clearance is recommended for the project. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................................................................. i LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................ iii LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................................... iv I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 1 II. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING............................................................................................................................. 2 III. PREVIOUS RESEARCH AND CULTURAL OVERVIEW ................................................................................. 13 IV. METHODS ....................................................................................................................................................... 36 V. MATERIALS RECOVERED ............................................................................................................................. 37 VI. RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................................ 48 VII. CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS, AND TREATMENT ...................................................................... 58 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................................................... 59 APPENDIX A. HISTORIC ARTIFACT INVENTORY ........................................................................................... A-1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Map of Kentucky showing the location of Madison County. ..................................................................... 1 Figure 2. Location of project area on topographic quadrangle. ............................................................................... 3 Figure 3. Project area plan map. ............................................................................................................................. 4 Figure 4. The Bluegrass region. .............................................................................................................................. 5 Figure 5. Rivers that drain the Bluegrass region. .................................................................................................... 6 Figure 6. Standing KY 3376 bridge that spans Hays Fork, facing northeast. ........................................................ 11 Figure 7. Creek terrace within the project area tested by shovel testing and bucket augering. ............................ 11 Figure 8. Vegetation within the project area southwest of the bridge, facing north. .............................................. 12 Figure 9. Lawn and surface disturbance related to a commercial development. .................................................. 12 Figure 10. 1929 topographic map depicting MS 1 (KGS 1929). ........................................................................... 20 Figure 11. 1952 topographic quadrangle depicting MS 1, MS 2, and MS 3 (USGS 1952b). ................................ 21 Figure 12. Historic materials recovered. ............................................................................................................... 41 Figure 13. Schematic plan map of Site 15Ma499. ................................................................................................ 49 Figure 14. Representative soil profiles from Site 15Ma499. ................................................................................. 52 Figure 15. Feature 1: a capped well, facing southeast. ........................................................................................ 54 Figure 16. Feature 2: L-shaped foundation outline, facing north. ......................................................................... 54 Figure 17. Feature 2: foundation piers. ................................................................................................................. 55 Figure 18. Feature 2: foundation pad, facing north. .............................................................................................. 55 iii LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Sites within the File Search Area without Associated Reports. .............................................................. 17 Table 2. Summary of Selected Information for Previously Recorded Archaeological Sites in Madison County, Kentucky. Data Obtained from OSA and May Contain Coding Errors. ........................................................ 19 Table 3. Historic Artifacts Recovered According to Functional Group.................................................................. 38 Table 4. Summary of Historic Materials Recovered. ............................................................................................ 39 Table 5. Historic Artifacts from Site 15Ma499. ..................................................................................................... 53 Table 6. Chain of Deeds for Site 15Ma499. ......................................................................................................... 56 Table A-1. Historic Artifacts Recovered. ............................................................................................................. A-3 iv The purpose of this survey was to assess I. INTRODUCTION any potential effects the proposed development might have on identified cultural n August 13, 2013, Cultural Resource resources. To do this, the archaeologists O Analysts, Inc. (CRA), personnel followed these objectives: conducted an archaeological survey of a proposed bridge replacement and approach identify prehistoric and historic archaeological modification along KY 3376 over Hays Fork sites located within the project area; Creek in Madison County, Kentucky (Figure determine, to the extent possible, the age and 1). The survey was conducted at the request of cultural affiliation of sites; David Waldner of the Kentucky establish the vertical and horizontal boundaries Transportation Cabinet (KYTC) (Item No. 7- of sites; and 1126.00) and only performed once landowner establish the degree of site integrity and permission was obtained. Michael Curran and potential for intact cultural deposits to be Lisa Kelley completed the survey in 20 person present. hours. Archival research was conducted at the Madison
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UC Berkeley International Association of Obsidian Studies Bulletin
    UC Berkeley International Association of Obsidian Studies Bulletin Title IAOS Bulletin 59 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3r35f908 Author Dillian, Carolyn D., [email protected] Publication Date 2018-06-15 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California IAOS International Association for Obsidian Studies Bulletin ISSN: 2310-5097 Number 59 Summer 2018 CONTENTS International Association for Obsidian Studies News and Information ………………………… 1 President Kyle Freund Notes from the President……....……….………. 2 Past President Rob Tykot MatLab for OHD Calculations…………………..9 Secretary-Treasurer Matt Boulanger Obsidian Macro-Core from Belize…………..…19 Bulletin Editor Carolyn Dillian Poverty Point’s Obsidian……………………….28 Webmaster Craig Skinner Instructions for Authors …..……………………42 About the IAOS………………………………...43 Web Site: http://members.peak.org/~obsidian/ Membership Application ………………………44 NEWS AND INFORMATION CONSIDER PUBLISHING IN THE NEWS AND NOTES IAOS BULLETIN Have news or announcements to share? The Bulletin is a twice-yearly publication that reaches Send them to [email protected] for a wide audience in the obsidian community. Please the next issue of the IAOS Bulletin. review your research notes and consider submitting an article, research update, news, or lab report for publication in the IAOS Bulletin. Articles and inquiries can be sent to [email protected] Thank you for your help and support! CALL FOR NOMINATIONS Kyle Freund has just begun his responsibilities as IAOS President, and Rob Tykot has stepped into the position of Past President for the coming year. That means that it’s now time for nominations for our next IAOS President. Elections will be held this winter and the winner announced at the 2019 IAOS meeting at the SAAs in Albuquerque.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithic Raw Material Prospects in the Mojave Desert, California
    UC Merced Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Title Lithic Raw Material Prospects in the Mojave Desert, California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8np7g12w Journal Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, 11(2) ISSN 0191-3557 Authors Wilke, Philip J. Schroth, Adella B. Publication Date 1989-07-01 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 146-174 (1989). Lithic Raw Material Prospects in the Mojave Desert, California PHILIP J. WILKE and ADELLA B. SCHROTH, Dept. of Anthropology, Univ. of California, Riverside, CA 92521. A HIS paper discusses lithic raw material THEORETICAL BACKGROUND prospects (or simply "prospects"), places where potentially flakeable tool stone was Acquisition of tool stone by aboriginal assayed or tested for quality. It characterizes peoples was an industry that in terms of scale this site type and contrasts it with quarries, varied greatly from one situation to another. places where stone was obtained consistently The large and well-known quarries of the and in quantity, and places where stone was western United States represent one end of picked up, used, and discarded with little the spectrum. These include the AUbates modification. We believe prospects represent silicified dolomite quarries, Texas; Spanish a major archaeological site type that has re­ Diggings quartzite quarries, Wyoming; ceived inadequate attention in the literature. Tosawihi opalite quarries, Nevada; and Casa We describe here a prospect site (CA- Diablo and Coso obsidian quarries, California, SBr-5872), characterize its assemblage, and to name a few.
    [Show full text]
  • Ra Ising the Ba R
    12 Ra ising the Ba r Lithic Analysis and Archaeological Research in the Southeast William Andrefsky Jr. When I was asked to provide comments on the collection of lithic analysis pa- pers presented at the Southeastern Archaeological Conference (included within this volume), I did not realize the extent to which lithic tools and debitage had been overlooked in the region as a medium for interpreting past aboriginal practices and behaviors. According to the session abstract, the goal of the lithic symposium and this volume is to highlight contemporary methods and theory in lithic analysis to encourage researchers in the Southeast to integrate lithic data into their site interpretations. After a quick perusal of the literature for the region, it was apparent that very few Southeast lithics-related publications have appeared in the national peer-reviewed literature (Daniel2001; Shott and Ballenger 2007); slightly more lithic research occurs in regional journal venues (Carr and Bradbury 2000; Franklin and Simek 2008; Peacock 2004); and other contributions are found in edited volumes not necessarily focused specifically on lithics in the region (Anderson and Sassaman 1996; Carr 1994a; Henry and Odell1989; Johnson and Morrow 1987). Similar to the case of Mesoamerica and the American Southwest, there is a relatively low proportion of lithics- based research relative to ceramics and architecture. Such a trend comes as a surprise to me. However, I have been hooked on stone tool technology since the sixth grade when I first began looking at Louis Leakey's Oldowan pebble tools and wondering whether the broken cobbles in my local creek could have been made by Australopithecus.
    [Show full text]
  • Program of the 75Th Anniversary Meeting
    PROGRAM OF THE 75 TH ANNIVERSARY MEETING April 14−April 18, 2010 St. Louis, Missouri THE ANNUAL MEETING of the Society for American Archaeology provides a forum for the dissemination of knowledge and discussion. The views expressed at the sessions are solely those of the speakers and the Society does not endorse, approve, or censor them. Descriptions of events and titles are those of the organizers, not the Society. Program of the 75th Anniversary Meeting Published by the Society for American Archaeology 900 Second Street NE, Suite 12 Washington DC 20002-3560 USA Tel: +1 202/789-8200 Fax: +1 202/789-0284 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://www.saa.org Copyright © 2010 Society for American Archaeology. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted in any form or by any means without prior permission from the publisher. Program of the 75th Anniversary Meeting 3 Contents 4............... Awards Presentation & Annual Business Meeting Agenda 5……….….2010 Award Recipients 10.................Maps of the America’s Center 12 ................Maps of Renaissance Grand St. Louis 14 ................Meeting Organizers, SAA Board of Directors, & SAA Staff 15 .............. General Information 18. ............. Featured Sessions 20 .............. Summary Schedule 25 .............. A Word about the Sessions 27............... Program 161................SAA Awards, Scholarships, & Fellowships 167............... Presidents of SAA . 168............... Annual Meeting Sites 169............... Exhibit Map 170................Exhibitor Directory 180................SAA Committees and Task Forces 184………….Index of participants 4 Program of the 75th Anniversary Meeting Awards Presentation & Annual Business Meeting America’s Center APRIL 16, 2010 5 PM Call to Order Call for Approval of Minutes of the 2009 Annual Business Meeting Remarks President Margaret W.
    [Show full text]
  • Lithic Technological Organization, Mobility, and Landscape Use from Jakes Valley, Nevada
    University of Nevada, Reno Paleoindian Occupations in the Great Basin: A Comparative Study of Lithic Technological Organization, Mobility, and Landscape Use from Jakes Valley, Nevada A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology By Mark B. Estes Dr. Gary Haynes/Thesis Advisor May, 2009 Copyright by Mark B. Estes 2009 All Rights Reserved THE GRADUATE SCHOOL We recommend that the thesis prepared under our supervision by MARK B. ESTES entitled Paleoindian Occupations In The Great Basin: A Comparative Study Of Lithic Technological Organization, Mobility, And Landscape Use From Jakes Valley, Nevada be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Gary Haynes, Ph.D., Advisor Michael R. Bever, Ph.D., Committee Member Ted Goebel, Ph.D., Committee Member P. Kyle House, Ph.D., Graduate School Representative Marsha H. Read, Ph. D., Associate Dean, Graduate School May, 2009 i Abstract Previous research on Paleoindian occupations in the Great Basin has provided many more questions than answers. Central to understanding this early period is the relationship between its Western Fluted and Western Stemmed Tradition occupants. Little is known of the temporal, cultural, and technological behaviors of Western Fluted peoples, while the Western Stemmed Tradition inhabitants are only slightly better understood. This thesis presents the results of intensive technological studies that focused on determining raw material provisioning strategies, lithic conveyance zones, and landscape use to identify mobility and settlement patterns. Lithic assemblages from 19 Paleoindian era occupations, encompassing several environmental zones within Jakes Valley in eastern Nevada, provide data on the technological organization and movement patterns of early humans in the Great Basin, and reveal previously unknown behaviors that help differentiate the early hunter-gatherer groups who made Fluted and Stemmed projectile points.
    [Show full text]
  • Skill and Cognition in Stone Tool Production F 695
    Current Anthropology Volume 43, Number 5, December 2002 ᭧ 2002 by The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. All rights reserved 0011-3204/2002/4305-0001$3.00 Assessing mental activity from the material residues of Skill and Cognition in behavior is a central problem for archaeologists working in any time period. In the case of Paleolithic archaeology, the endeavor is further weighted with evolutionary im- Stone Tool Production plications (e.g., Holloway 1969, Parker and Gibson 1979, Isaac 1986, Wynn 1993, Gowlett 1996, Ambrose 2001). Because of their persistence in the archaeological record An Ethnographic Case Study and because they provide evidence of individual tech- nical acts, knapped stone artifacts are commonly used from Irian Jaya1 as a source of information about prehistoric and pre- modern mental abilities. Although stone tools do not necessarily provide evidence of the full range of their makers’ mental abilities, they do indicate certain min- by Dietrich Stout imum required competences (Gowlett 1996). In order to assess these competences, we must ultimately rely upon models developed from actualistic research in the mod- ern world. Since it is impossible to observe the evolving Stone tools represent some of the best remaining evidence of pre- technological behaviors of extinct hominid species di- historic behavior and cognition. Interpreting this evidence prop- rectly, our reconstructions should at least be able to draw erly requires models based on observable phenomena in the mod- upon an understanding of the modern human condition. ern world. For this reason, ethnographic research was undertaken In order to contribute to the development of such among the adze makers of the village of Langda in Indonesian Irian Jaya.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio Archaeologist 26 3
    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGIST VOLUME 26 SUMMER 1976 i I • • The Archaeological Society of Ohio Officers—terms expire 1978 Robert Harter, 1961 Buttermilk Hill, Delaware, Ohio President—Jan Sorgenfrei, Jeff Carskadden, 2686 Carol Drive, Zanesville, Ohio 2985 Canterbury Drive, Lima, Ohio 45805 Associate Editor, Martha P. Otto, Vice President—Steve Fuller, Ohio Historical Society, Columbus, Ohio 4767 Hudson Drive, Stow, Ohio 44224 All articles, reviews and comments on the Ohio Archae­ Executive Secretary—Dana L. Baker, ologist should be sent to the Editor. Memberships, re­ West Taylor St., Mt. Victory, Ohio 43340 quests for back issues, changes of address, and other Treasurer—Don Bapst, matter should be sent to the business office. 2446 Chambers Ave., Columbus, Ohio 43223 Recording Secretary—Mike Kish, PLEASE NOTIFY BUSINESS OFFICE IMMEDIATELY 39 Parkview Ave., Westerville, Ohio 43081 OF ADDRESS CHANGES. BY POSTAL REGULATIONS Editor—Robert N. Converse, SOCIETY MAIL CANNOT BE FORWARDED. P.O. Box 61, Plain City, Ohio 43064 Editorial Office Trustees P. O. Box, Plain City, Ohio 43064 Terms expire Ensil Chadwick, 119 Rose Ave., Business Office Mount Vernon, Ohio 1978 Summers Redick, 35 West River Glen Drive, Wayne A. Mortine, Scott Drive, Worthington, Ohio 43085 Oxford Heights, Newcomerstown, Ohio 1978 Charles H. Stout, 91 Redbank Drive, Membership and Dues Fairborn, Ohio 1978 Annual dues to the Archaeological Society of Ohio are Max Shipley, 705 S. Ogden Ave., payable on the first of January as follows: Regular mem­ Columbus, Ohio 1978 bership $7.50; Husband and wife (one copy of publication) William C. Haney, 706 Buckhom St., $8.50; Contributing $25.00. Funds are used for publish­ Ironton, Ohio 1980 ing the Ohio Archaeologist.
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of the First Americas
    In Search of the First Americas Michael R. Waters Departments of Anthropology and Geography Center for the Study of the First Americans Texas A&M University Who were the first Americans? When did they arrive in the New World? Where did they come from? How did they travel to the Americas & settle the continent? A Brief History of Paleoamerican Archaeology Prior to 1927 People arrived late to the Americas ca. 6000 B.P. 1927 Folsom Site Discovery, New Mexico Geological Estimate in 1927 10,000 to 20,000 B.P. Today--12,000 cal yr B.P. Folsom Point Blackwater Draw (Clovis), New Mexico 1934 Clovis Discovery Folsom (Bison) Clovis (Mammoth) Ernst Antevs Geological estimate 13,000 to 14,000 B.P. Today 13,000 cal yr B.P. 1935-1990 Search continued for sites older than Clovis. Most sites did not stand up to scientific scrutiny. Calico Hills More Clovis sites were found across North America The Clovis First Model became entrenched. Pedra Furada Tule Springs Clovis First Model Clovis were the first people to enter the Americas -Originated from Northeast Asia -Entered the Americas by crossing the Bering Land Bridge and passing through the Ice Free Corridor around 13,600 cal yr B.P. (11,500 14C yr B.P.) -Clovis technology originated south of the Ice Sheets -Distinctive tools that are widespread -Within 800 years reached the southern tip of South America -Big game hunters that killed off the Megafauna Does this model still work? What is Clovis? • Culture • Era • Complex Clovis is an assemblage of distinctive tools that were made in a very prescribed way.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13 Chipped Stone Bifaces As Cultural, Behavioural, And
    Chapter 13 Chipped Stone Bifaces as Cultural, Behavioural, and Temporal Indices on the Central Canadian Plateau Mike K. Rousseau Antiquus Archaeological Consultants Ltd., Maple Ridge B.C. V4R 0A8 • Email: [email protected] Over the last three and a half decades, archaeo- to successfully extract and utilize resources within logical investigations on the Canadian Plateau have a wide range of local environmental niches, and to resulted in definition of several ubiquitous and cope with significant environmental and climatic distinctive chipped stone formed bifacial projectile changes spanning many millennia. Chipped stone point and knife types. Many have been successfully bifaces were an important and integral aspect of employed as temporal horizon markers for relative these cultural and technological systems, and with dating, others for interpreting and reconstructing the proper reconstruction and understanding of past human behaviour, and a few have been used for their role(s) and significance, a great deal of behav- developing models of cultural/ethnic group origins, ioral and ethnic information can be inferred from identity, and inter-regional group interaction. This them. chapter provides general and detailed descriptions The Early Prehistoric (pre-contact) Period from of recognized “diagnostic” biface types found on the ca. 11,000 to 7000 BP is still very poorly understood, central aspect of Canadian Plateau (Figure 1) over nevertheless, both solid and tenuous data have been the last 11,000 years. It also summarizes what is gathered. Rousseau (1993) and Stryd and Rousseau currently known about initial appearance and ter- (1996:179−185) have summarized what is currently mination dates for various bifacial implement forms known, and additional information is presented and their persistence through time; suspected and/or herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Knife River Flint Distribution and Identification in Montana
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2016 Knife River Flint Distribution and Identification in Montana Laura Evilsizer University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Indigenous Studies Commons, and the United States History Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Evilsizer, Laura, "Knife River Flint Distribution and Identification in Montana" (2016). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 10670. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/10670 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. KNIFE RIVER FLINT DISTRIBUTION AND IDENTIFICATION IN MONTANA By Laura Jean Evilsizer B.A. Anthropology, Whitman College, Walla Walla, WA, 2011 Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology, Cultural Heritage University of Montana Missoula, MT May, 2016 Approved By: Scott Wittenburg, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School Dr. Douglas H. MacDonald, Chair Department of Anthropology Dr. John Douglas Department of Anthropology Dr. Julie A.
    [Show full text]
  • Quartz Technology in Scottish Prehistory
    Quartz technology in Scottish prehistory by Torben Bjarke Ballin Scottish Archaeological Internet Report 26, 2008 www.sair.org.uk Published by the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, www.socantscot.org.uk with Historic Scotland, www.historic-scotland.gov.uk and the Council for British Archaeology, www.britarch.ac.uk Editor Debra Barrie Produced by Archétype Informatique SARL, www.archetype-it.com ISBN: 9780903903943 ISSN: 1473-3803 Requests for permission to reproduce material from a SAIR report should be sent to the Director of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, as well as to the author, illustrator, photographer or other copyright holder. Copyright in any of the Scottish Archaeological Internet Reports series rests with the SAIR Consortium and the individual authors. The maps are reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of The Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. ©Crown copyright 2001. Any unauthorized reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Historic Scotland Licence No GD 03032G, 2002. The consent does not extend to copying for general distribution, advertising or promotional purposes, the creation of new collective works or resale. ii Contents List of illustrations. vi List of tables . viii 1 Summary. 1 2 Introduction. 2 2.1 Project background, aims and working hypotheses . .2 2.2 Methodology . 2 2.2.1 Raw materials . .2 2.2.2 Typology. .3 2.2.3 Technology . .3 2.2.4 Distribution analysis. 3 2.2.5 Dating. 3 2.3 Project history . .3 2.3.1 Pilot project. 4 2.3.2 Main project .
    [Show full text]
  • OSL Ages of the Clovis, Late Paleoindian, and Archaic Components at Area 15 of the Gault Site, Central Texas, U.S.A
    Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 7 (2016) 94–103 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jasrep OSL ages of the Clovis, Late Paleoindian, and Archaic components at Area 15 of the Gault Site, Central Texas, U.S.A. K. Rodrigues a,⁎, W.J. Rink b,M.B.Collinsc,T.J.Williamsc, A. Keen-Zebert d,G.I.Lόpez e a Department of Geological Sciences and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N Virginia St, Reno, NV 89557, United States b School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada c Department of Anthropology, Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX 78666, United States d Division of Earth and Ecosystem Sciences, Desert Research Institute, 2215 Raggio Parkway, Reno, NV 89503, United States e Luminescence Dating Laboratory, CENIEH (Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana), Paseo Sierra de Atapuerca 3, Burgos 09002, Spain article info abstract Article history: The Gault Site, Texas, U.S.A., affords a near-complete regional prehistoric sequence from an ~2 m-thick alluvial Received 31 August 2015 sedimentary interval. Age estimates on Clovis, Late Paleoindian, and Archaic components were obtained using Received in revised form 10 March 2016 optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating of silt-sized quartz grains. The luminescence characteristics of Accepted 11 March 2016 the quartz are favorable, showing normal equivalent dose distributions and no evidence of incomplete zeroing. Available online 12 April 2016 The artifacts span Clovis to Archaic forms, and their ages are generally in excellent agreement with independent radiocarbon ages from five other Texas sites.
    [Show full text]