In the Supreme Court of the United States

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

In the Supreme Court of the United States NO. 18-453 In the Supreme Court of the United States OLIVIA DE HAVILLAND, DBE, Petitioner, v. FX NETWORKS, LLC AND PACIFIC 2.1 ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC., Respondents. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND DISTRICT BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI SARAH G. BOYCE KELLY M. KLAUS Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP Counsel of Record 1155 F Street, NW JENNIFER L. BRYANT Washington, DC 20004 Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP (202) 220-1100 350 South Grand Ave. 50th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 (213) 683-9100 [email protected] Counsel for Respondents i QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the California Court of Appeal erred in holding, under the state’s anti-SLAPP statute, that Petitioner could not proceed with her claims for: (1) false-light invasion of privacy, because (a) as a matter of California law, Respondents’ portrayal of Plaintiff was not “highly offensive” and thus not actionable; and (b) as a matter of law, Peti- tioner, who indisputably is a “public figure,” could not show that Respondents acted with “actual malice” in their depiction of Petitioner; and (2) violation of California’s common law and stat- utory right of publicity, where the court concluded that Respondents’ portrayal of a character based on Petitioner was “transformative” as a matter of law and therefore subject to a complete defense under California Supreme Court precedent? ii CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Respondents are FX Networks, LLC and Pacific 2.1 Entertainment Group. Inc. Respondents’ ulti- mate parent company is Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc., a publicly traded company. There is no parent or publicly held company owning 10% or more of Twenty-First Century Fox, Inc.’s stock. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE QUESTION PRESENTED ........................................... i CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ............. ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ........................................ v INTRODUCTION ........................................................ 1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE ..................................... 3 A. Factual Background ............................... 3 B. State Court Proceedings ......................... 6 REASONS FOR DENYING THE PETITION ........... 13 I. This Court Cannot and Should Not Review the Dismissal of Petitioner’s False-Light Claim ............................................ 13 A. This Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Petitioner’s False-Light Claim ..................................................... 13 B. Even if this Court had Jurisdiction, the Court of Appeal’s Factbound Application of the Actual Malice Rule Does Not Merit Certiorari Review ................ 15 II. The Court of Appeal’s Dismissal of Petitioner’s Right-of-Publicity Claim Does Not Warrant Review .............................. 22 CONCLUSION ........................................................... 24 iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES PAGE(S) FEDERAL CASES Curtis Publ’g Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130 (1967) .............................................. 17 Dodds v. American Broad. Co., 145 F.3d 1053 (9th Cir. 1998) .............................. 11 Fox Film Corp. v. Muller, 296 U.S. 207 (1935) .............................................. 13 Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323 (1974) ............................ 17, 18, 19, 20 Harte-Hanks Commc’ns, Inc. v. Connaughton, 491 U.S. 657 (1989) .............................................. 17 Herb v. Pitcairn, 324 U.S. 117 (1945) .............................................. 13 Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1983) ...................................... 13, 15 New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964) .......................................... 1, 20 Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps, 475 U.S. 767 (1986) .............................................. 17 Sarver v. Chartier, 813 F.3d 891 (9th Cir. 2016) ................................ 23 v Thoroughbred Legends, LLC v. The Walt Disney Co., No. 1:07-CV-1275-BBM, 2008 WL 616253 (N.D. Ga. Feb. 12, 2008) .................... 20, 21 United States v. Alvarez, 567 U.S. 709 (2012) ........................................ 18, 19 STATE CASES Aisenson v. American Broad. Co., 220 Cal. App. 3d 146 (1990) ................................. 15 Brodeur v. Atlas Entm’t, Inc., 248 Cal. App. 4th 665 (2016) ................................ 14 Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. Gary Saderup, Inc., 25 Cal. 4th 387 (2001) .................................... 12, 23 Gilbert v. Sykes, 147 Cal. App. 4th 13 (2007).................................. 11 Good Gov’t Grp. of Seal Beach, Inc. v. Superior Court, 22 Cal.3d 672 (1978) ............................................. 11 Guglielmi v. Spelling-Goldberg Productions, 25 Cal. 3d 860 (1979) ............................................ 21 Rusheen v. Cohen, 37 Cal. 4th 1048 (2006) .......................................... 9 FEDERAL STATUTES 28 U.S.C. § 1257 ..................................................... 2, 14 vi STATE STATUTES Cal. Civ. Code § 3344 ................................................. 23 Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.16............................. 1, 9, 12 OTHER AUTHORITIES Emily Nussbaum, “Feud”: A Bittersweet Beauty, THE NEW YORKER (Mar. 20, 2017), available at https://www.new yorker.com/magazine/2017/03/20/feud -a-bittersweet-beauty; ............................................ 4 Epic TV Experience, SALON (Mar. 4, 2017), available at https://www.salon.com/2017/03/04/ with-feud-bette-and-joan-a- hollywood-rivalry-for-the-ages- becomes-an-epic-tv-experience/.............................. 4 1 INTRODUCTION Applying its state’s anti-SLAPP statute, Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.16, the California Court of Appeal unanimously held that Petitioner had no probability of prevailing on her claims that Respondents placed her in a false light or violated her right of publicity through their inclusion of an Olivia de Havilland character in the Emmy-winning miniseries Feud: Bette and Joan (“Feud”). The court’s decision rested on a straightforward application of well-established law. Petitioner’s mischaracterizations of Feud and of the court of appeal’s opinion fail to obscure the fact that there is nothing cert-worthy about this case. Contrary to Petitioner’s hyperbole, the court of appeal did not hold that the First Amendment “grant[s] absolute immunity to docudramas,” (Pet. at 13)—nor anything close to that. The court actually held, far more modestly, that Petitioner’s false-light claim failed as a matter of law because (1) she could not show that the snippets of dialogue that formed the basis for her claim were “highly offensive to a reasonable person,” as they must be under California law for Petitioner to have a claim (Pet. App. at 29a- 34a); and (2) alternatively, Petitioner had no evidence that Respondents, who indisputably tried to portray Petitioner as the wise and respectful counselor and friend to Davis that she was in real life, acted with “actual malice,” as New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), and its progeny require in a case of alleged public-figure defamation (Pet. App. at 37a- 38a). The court’s first holding, which Petitioner barely acknowledges, provides an adequate and independent state-law ground for the decision below, with the consequence that this Court has no certiorari juris- 2 diction under 28 U.S.C. § 1257 to review the dismis- sal of the false-light claim. Moreover, the court’s alternative holding is a factbound application of the “actual malice” standard that does not merit this Court’s review, even if the Court had jurisdiction. Petitioner’s arguments for review of the court of appeal’s right-of-publicity ruling—set forth largely in one footnote in the Petition—likewise miss the mark. The court of appeal did not hold that the First Amendment absolutely immunizes any use of “the name and identity of a living person” in a docudrama, irrespective of other facts; nor did the court’s decision rest on a purely quantitative analysis of “how many minutes of time are spent on subjects other than the” right-of-publicity plaintiff. (Pet. at 19 n.34.) The court instead held that the First Amendment applied to Feud, an expressive work, and that there was no evidence that Respondents falsely implied Petition- er’s endorsement of the miniseries. The court also held, under California Supreme Court precedent, that Respondents had a “transformative” defense to Peti- tioner’s right-of-publicity claim, both because Peti- tioner’s name and likeness were simply “raw materi- als” from which the larger work was “synthesized,” and because the primary economic value of Feud did not derive from Petitioner’s fame. (Pet. App. at 27a.) Petitioner presents no grounds justifying this Court’s review of these factbound determinations. 3 STATEMENT OF THE CASE A. Factual Background 1. Feud: Bette and Joan Feud is an eight-part televised miniseries that tells the story of the legendary rivalry between the actors Bette Davis and Joan Crawford. The series’ initial episodes focus on the conflicts between Davis and Crawford during the 1962 filming of Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? (“Baby Jane”), the only movie in which both appeared. Later epi- sodes portray the fallout from that experience, includ- ing the ill-fated attempt by Baby Jane’s director, Robert Aldrich, to reprise the Davis-Crawford pairing during the 1964 filming of Hush … Hush, Sweet Charlotte (“Charlotte”). Crawford was eventually fired from Charlotte, and Petitioner replaced her in the movie. Feud uses the Davis-Crawford relationship from 1960s Hollywood to explore current-day issues affect- ing women, including ageism, sexism,
Recommended publications
  • See It Big! Action Features More Than 30 Action Movie Favorites on the Big
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ‘SEE IT BIG! ACTION’ FEATURES MORE THAN 30 ACTION MOVIE FAVORITES ON THE BIG SCREEN April 19–July 7, 2019 Astoria, New York, April 16, 2019—Museum of the Moving Image presents See It Big! Action, a major screening series featuring more than 30 action films, from April 19 through July 7, 2019. Programmed by Curator of Film Eric Hynes and Reverse Shot editors Jeff Reichert and Michael Koresky, the series opens with cinematic swashbucklers and continues with movies from around the world featuring white- knuckle chase sequences and thrilling stuntwork. It highlights work from some of the form's greatest practitioners, including John Woo, Michael Mann, Steven Spielberg, Akira Kurosawa, Kathryn Bigelow, Jackie Chan, and much more. As the curators note, “In a sense, all movies are ’action’ movies; cinema is movement and light, after all. Since nearly the very beginning, spectacle and stunt work have been essential parts of the form. There is nothing quite like watching physical feats, pulse-pounding drama, and epic confrontations on a large screen alongside other astonished moviegoers. See It Big! Action offers up some of our favorites of the genre.” In all, 32 films will be shown, many of them in 35mm prints. Among the highlights are two classic Technicolor swashbucklers, Michael Curtiz’s The Adventures of Robin Hood and Jacques Tourneur’s Anne of the Indies (April 20); Kurosawa’s Seven Samurai (April 21); back-to-back screenings of Mad Max: Fury Road and Aliens on Mother’s Day (May 12); all six Mission: Impossible films
    [Show full text]
  • Withering Heights
    Withering Heights When one mentions the Presbyterian Church, the name that first comes to mind is that of the Scottish Calvinist clergyman John Knox. This dynamic religious leader of the Protestant Reformation founded the Presbyterian denomination and was at the beginning of his ministry in Edinburgh when he lost his beloved wife Marjorie Bowes. In 1564 he married again, but the marriage received a great deal of attention. This was because she was remotely connected with the royal family, and Knox was almost three times the age of this young lady of only seventeen years. She was Margaret Stewart, daughter of Andrew Stewart, 2nd Lord of Ochiltree. She bore Knox three daughters, of whom Elizabeth became the wife of John Welsh, the famous minister of Ayr. Their daughter Lucy married another clergyman, the Reverend James Alexander Witherspoon. Their descendant, John Knox Witherspoon (son of another Reverend James Alexander Witherspoon), signed the Declaration of Independence on behalf of New Jersey and (in keeping with family tradition) was also a minister, in fact the only minister to sign the historic document. John Knox Witherspoon (1723 – 1794), clergyman, Princeton’s sixth president and signer of the Declaration of Independence. Just like Declaration of Independence signatory John Witherspoon, actress Reese Witherspoon is also descended from Reverend James Alexander Witherspoon and his wife Lucy (and therefore John Knox). The future Academy Award winner, born Laura Jeanne Reese Witherspoon, was born in New Orleans, having made her début appearance at Southern Baptist Hospital on March 22, 1976. New Orleans born Academy Award winning actress, Reese Witherspoon Reese did not get to play Emily Brontë’s Cathy in “Wuthering Heights” but she did portray Becky Sharp in Thackeray’s “Vanity Fair”.
    [Show full text]
  • Senior Women's Performances of Sexuality
    “DUSTY MUFFINS”: SENIOR WOMEN’S PERFORMANCES OF SEXUALITY A Thesis by EVLEEN MICHELLE NASIR Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS August 2012 Major Subject: Performance Studies “Dusty Muffins”: Senior Women’s Performances of Sexuality Copyright 2012 Evleen Michelle Nasir “DUSTY MUFFINS”: SENIOR WOMEN’S PERFORMANCES OF SEXUALITY A Thesis by EVLEEN MICHELLE NASIR Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, Kirsten Pullen Committee Members, Judith Hamera Harry Berger Alfred Bendixen Head of Department, Judith Hamera August 2012 Major Subject: Performance Studies iii ABSTRACT “Dusty Muffins”: Senior Women’s Performance of Sexuality. (August 2012) Evleen Michelle Nasir, B.A., Texas A&M University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Kirsten Pullen There is a discursive formation of incapability that surrounds senior women’s sexuality. Senior women are incapable of reproduction, mastering their bodies, or arousing sexual desire in themselves or others. The senior actresses’ I explore in the case studies below insert their performances of self and their everyday lives into the large and complicated discourse of sex, producing a counter-narrative to sexually inactive senior women. Their performances actively embody their sexuality outside the frame of a character. This thesis examines how senior actresses’ performances of sexuality extend a discourse of sexuality imposed on older woman by mass media. These women are the public face of senior women’s sexual agency.
    [Show full text]
  • Noel Bon Tempo TAH September 27, 2012 the Life of Frank Sinatra
    Noel Bon Tempo TAH September 27, 2012 The life of Frank Sinatra spans the majority of the 20th Century. He entered the world in Hoboken, New Jersey, on December 12, 1915. He died on May 14, 1998. His cultural impact is the subject of Pete Hamill’s extended essay, “Why Sinatra Matters.” Hamill knew Sinatra. He spoke with Hamill on numerous occasions in the 1970’s and 1980’s in anticipation of writing a biography of the singer. Frank Sinatra was the son of immigrants. He was a high school dropout who worked dead-end jobs while dreaming of becoming a singer. He never learned to read music and became, arguably, the most accomplished and famous musician of the 20th Century. Hamill’s work is “. an unusually thoughtful contribution to the growing body of literature of appreciation of Sinatra as an artist, a supreme interpreter of the great American popular song.” (Kirkus Review) Hamill focuses his investigation of Sinatra’s life on his rise to stardom from his hard-scrabble days in Hoboken to his fall from grace in the late 1940’s to his stunning comeback in the 1950’s. As such, this is a story of redemption and reinvention. This type of story strikes a particular chord in the American psyche. Begun by Benjamin Franklin’s “Autobiography”, affirmed by Ralph Waldo Emerson, Sinatra’s story of redemption is modeled by his contemporaries such as Malcolm X and Richard Nixon, and in contemporary society by Bill Clinton and Oprah Winfrey. (Redemptiveself) Sinatra’s life exemplifies some of the major cultural and social movements of the 20th Century.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fargo Beat Fargo-Moorhead Social & Word of Mouth Network April 28, 2011
    The Fargo Beat Fargo-Moorhead Social & Word of Mouth Network April 28, 2011 “The most important single ingredient in the formula of success is knowing how to get along with people.” -Theodore Roosevelt SOCIAL th • 8 ANNUAL ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY EXPO – April 28, 2011, with a Pre-conference Workshop on April 27, 2011 in Fargo, ND. The day includes a morning of presentations by AT providers and vendors. There is a registration fee of $30 for these sessions and lunch. Scholarships are available to individuals with disabilities on a first-come, first serve basis. The AT Expo runs 11:00am-6:00pm and is free and open to the public . Over 60 vendors and service organizations are expected. More information on presentations, vendors, and how to register for this event can be found at www.atexpo.org or by contacting Jenny Davis at 1-877-760-2939 (701-526-3454) or email [email protected] . • Red Raven Espresso Parlor Grand Reopening Celebration – Sat 4/29, 916 Main Ave, Fargo. Full espresso bar, weekly events, a used book store, gallery and more. Events include a seed and plant exchange at 6pm, a group bike ride at 8pm, and music from 9- 11pm. • Valley Vintage Car Show – Sat 4/30 10am-8pm and Sun 5/1 10am-4pm, Fargo Civic Center. $7 at the door, kids 12 and under free. • Musical May Basket: Tribute to Frank Sinatra – Sun 5/1, 4pm, Fargo Theatre. Nostalgic, romantic sounds of the FM Kicks Big Band and David Ferreira’s tribute to the songs of Frank Sinatra.
    [Show full text]
  • Juliet Ouyoung 917-528-9764
    Feb. 2015 Page #1 of 2 Juliet Ouyoung 917-528-9764 www.jouyoung.com Costume Designer Assistant Costume Designer The Shanghai Hotel 2006 Late Show With David Letterman 2006-2015 Feature / Cornucopia Productions Talk –Variety TV Show \ CBS – Worldwide Pants INC. 2006 Contemporary Drama/ Human Trafficking Fast Paste Sketch Characters \ Comedy Hill Harper, Pei Pei Cheng, Eugenia Yuan Bruce Willis, Steve Martin, Martin Short, Bill Murray,Chris Elliott Jerry Davis, Director Jerry Foley , Director ; Sue Hum, CD Neurotica 2000 Bernard & Doris 2005 Feature / Three Forks Productions Feature / Trigger Street Productions 2000 Contemporary Comedy / Road Trip 1980’s-1990’s Drama / Doris Duke Biopic Brian D’Arcy James, Amy Sedaris Ralph Fiennes, Susan Sarandon Roger Rawlings, Director Bob Balaban, Director ; Joe Aulissi, CD Mob Queen 1997 Copshop 2003 Feature / Etoile Productions Pilot / PBS Television 1956 Comedy / Mafia Meets Transvestite 2003 Contemporary Drama / NYPD - Brothel Tony Sirico, David Proval, Candice Kane Richard Dreyfuss, Rosey Perez, Rita Moreno, Blair Brown Jon Carnoy, Director Anita Addison & Joe Cacaci , director ; Bobby Tilly, CD Harwood 1999 Like Mother Like Son 2002 Feature / Absolutely Legitimate Film MOW / CBS Televison 1999 Contemporary / Sci-fi Thriller 1998 Contemporary Drama / Sente Kimes’ Story Morgan Roberts, Director Mary Tyler Moore, Jean Stapleton Arthur Seidelman, Director; Martin Pakledinaz, CD The Floys Of Neighborly Lane 1998 Deconstructing Harry 1996 Short / Once Upon A Picture Production Feature / Sweetheart Productions
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Heide Meeting Jackie
    Excerpt from When Jackie Met Ethyl / Curated by Dan Cameron, May 5 – June 1, 2016 © 2016 Howl! Arts, Inc. Page 1 Robert Heide Meeting Jackie I first met Jackie Curtis through theater director Ron Link, during rehearsals of Jackie’s outrageous nostalgic/camp Hollywood comedy-play Glamour Glory, and Gold at Bastiano’s Cellar Studio in the Village. In the cast were platinum Melba LaRose Jr. playing a Jean Harlow-type screen siren, Robert De Niro in his very first acting role playing all the male parts, and Candy Darling, still a brunette before being transformed by Link—with the help of Max Factor theatrical make-up, false eyelashes, blue eye shadow, and for her hair, 20 volume peroxide mixed with white henna ammonia—into the super-blonde Goddess she is thought of today. Jackie also became a Warhol Superstar, along with her glamorous sisters Candy and Holly Woodlawn. At the time of my first introduction, Jackie was a pretty boy wearing wire-rimmed eyeglasses with natural rosy cheeks and brown hair. Initially shy and introverted, he was given a quick makeover by Svengali Link and changed, with the help of red henna, into a flaming redhead with glossy scarlet lips à la Barbara Stanwyck, Jackie’s favorite film star. Gobs of facial glitter would later add to the mix. During the run of Glamour, Glory, and Gold, Sally Kirkland, who lived upstairs from me on Christopher Street, brought along her friend Shelley Winters to Bastiano’s to see Jackie’s show. Shelley was about to open in her own play, One Night Stands of a Noisy Passenger, at the Actors’ Playhouse on Sheridan Square, and became enamored with the young, sexy, muscular De Niro, deciding to cast him in her show, where he ran around stage in his bathing trunks.
    [Show full text]
  • Jessica Lange Regis Dialogue Formatted
    Jessica Lange Regis Dialogue with Molly Haskell, 1997 Bruce Jenkins: Let me say that these dialogues have for the better part of this decade focused on that part of cinema devoted to narrative or dramatic filmmaking, and we've had evenings with actors, directors, cinematographers, and I would say really especially with those performers that we identify with the cutting edge of narrative filmmaking. In describing tonight's guest, Molly Haskell spoke of a creative artist who not only did a sizeable number of important projects but more importantly, did the projects that she herself wanted to see made. The same I think can be said about Molly Haskell. She began in the 1960s working in New York for the French Film Office at that point where the French New Wave needed a promoter and a writer and a translator. She eventually wrote the landmark book From Reverence to Rape on women in cinema from 1973 and republished in 1987, and did sizable stints as the film reviewer for Vogue magazine, The Village Voice, New York magazine, New York Observer, and more recently, for On the Issues. Her most recent book, Holding My Own in No Man's Land, contains her last two decades' worth of writing. I'm please to say it's in the Walker bookstore, as well. Our other guest tonight needs no introduction here in the Twin Cities nor in Cloquet, Minnesota, nor would I say anyplace in the world that motion pictures are watched and cherished. She's an internationally recognized star, but she's really a unique star.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Classic Film Series, Now in Its 43Rd Year
    Austin has changed a lot over the past decade, but one tradition you can always count on is the Paramount Summer Classic Film Series, now in its 43rd year. We are presenting more than 110 films this summer, so look forward to more well-preserved film prints and dazzling digital restorations, romance and laughs and thrills and more. Escape the unbearable heat (another Austin tradition that isn’t going anywhere) and join us for a three-month-long celebration of the movies! Films screening at SUMMER CLASSIC FILM SERIES the Paramount will be marked with a , while films screening at Stateside will be marked with an . Presented by: A Weekend to Remember – Thurs, May 24 – Sun, May 27 We’re DEFINITELY Not in Kansas Anymore – Sun, June 3 We get the summer started with a weekend of characters and performers you’ll never forget These characters are stepping very far outside their comfort zones OPENING NIGHT FILM! Peter Sellers turns in not one but three incomparably Back to the Future 50TH ANNIVERSARY! hilarious performances, and director Stanley Kubrick Casablanca delivers pitch-dark comedy in this riotous satire of (1985, 116min/color, 35mm) Michael J. Fox, Planet of the Apes (1942, 102min/b&w, 35mm) Humphrey Bogart, Cold War paranoia that suggests we shouldn’t be as Christopher Lloyd, Lea Thompson, and Crispin (1968, 112min/color, 35mm) Charlton Heston, Ingrid Bergman, Paul Henreid, Claude Rains, Conrad worried about the bomb as we are about the inept Glover . Directed by Robert Zemeckis . Time travel- Roddy McDowell, and Kim Hunter. Directed by Veidt, Sydney Greenstreet, and Peter Lorre.
    [Show full text]
  • BRIEF CHRONICLE Artistic Director the Official Newsmagazine of Writers’ Theatre Kathryn M
    ISSUE twEnty-nInE MAY 2010 1 A STREETCAR NAMED DESIRE: On Stage Table of ConTenTs Dear Friends .................................................................................................... 3 “DroppeD overboarD… on Stage: A Streetcar Named Desire ...................................................................... 5 The Man. The Play. The Legend. ........................................................ 6 Director's Sidebar .................................................................................... 10 into an ocean Acting Cromer ............................................................................................. 12 Setting the Scene ..................................................................................... 13 Why Here? Why Now? ............................................................................ 14 Announcing the 2010/11 Season ................................................. 16 baCksTage: as blue as Event Wrap Up – Behind-the-Scenes Brunch ........................... 20 Event Wrap Up – Literary Luncheon ............................................ 22 Sponsor Salute ........................................................................................... 24 Tales of a True Fourth Grade Nothing .......................................... 26 Performance Calendar .......................................................................... 29 my first lover’s eyes!” - blanChe, A Streetcar named desire 2 A STREETCAR NAMED DESIRE: On Stage A STREETCAR NAMED DESIRE: On Stage 1 Michael halberstam tHe
    [Show full text]
  • Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR Developments, Issue 5/2018 Stanford-Vienna Transatlantic Technology Law Forum 3
    Stanford – Vienna Transatlantic Technology Law Forum A joint initiative of Stanford Law School and the University of Vienna School of Law Transatlantic Antitrust and IPR Developments Bimonthly Newsletter Issue No. 5/2018 (November 2, 2018) Contributors: Gabriel M. Lentner, Jonathan Cardenas, Kletia Noti, Marie-Andrée Weiss Editor-in-chief: Juha Vesala 2 Contents INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ............................................................................................... 5 United States .......................................................................................................................................... 5 A Study in Trademarked Characters ................................................................................................... 5 There is Such Thing as Bad (Right of) Publicity ................................................................................. 9 What’s New in the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) .......................................................... 13 OTHER DEVELOPMENTS ..................................................................................................15 United States ........................................................................................................................................ 15 Olivia de Havilland Asks Supreme Court to Review Docudrama Right of Publicity Case ................ 15 European Union ................................................................................................................................... 18 The UK House
    [Show full text]
  • JOAN CRAWFORD Early Life and Inspiration Joan Crawford Was Born Lucille Fay Lesueur on March 23, 1908, in San Antonio, Texas
    JOAN CRAWFORD Early Life and Inspiration Joan Crawford was born Lucille Fay LeSueur on March 23, 1908, in San Antonio, Texas. Her biological father, Thomas E. LeSueur, left the family shortly after Lucille’s birth, leaving Anna Bell Johnson, her mother, behind to take care of the family. page 1 Lucille’s mother later married Henry J. Cassin, an opera house owner from Lawton, Oklahoma, which is where the family settled. Throughout her childhood there, Lucille frequently watched performances in her stepfather’s theater. Lucille, having grown up watching the many vaudeville acts perform at the theater, grew up wanting to pursue a dancing career. page 2 In 1917, Lucille’s family moved to Kansas City after her stepfather was accused of embezzlement. Cassin, a Catholic, sent Lucille to a Catholic girls’ school by the name of St. Agnes Academy. When her mother and stepfather divorced, she remained at the academy as a work student. It was there that she began dating and met a man named Ray Sterling, who inspired her to start working hard in school. page 3 In 1922, Lucille registered at Stephens College in Columbia, Missouri. However, she only attended the college for a few months before dropping out when she realized that she was not prepared enough for college. page 4 Early Career After her stint at Stephens, Lucille began dancing in various traveling choruses under the name Lucille LeSueur. While performing in Detroit, her talent was noticed by a producer named Jacob Shubert. Shubert gave her a spot in his 1924 Broadway show Innocent Eyes, in which she performed in the chorus line.
    [Show full text]