DOCSLIB.ORG

Approved 50-Key Hotel Development Opportunity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Approved 50-Key Hotel Development Opportunity CONFIDENTIAL OFFERING MEMORANDUM BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS Approved 50-Key Hotel Development Opportunity 188 High Street is an approved, 14 story, 50 Key hotel development opportunity located in the heart of Boston’s Financial District. The project is approved by the Boston Planning & Development Agency and the City of Boston Zoning Board of Appeals. All appeal periods have expired. The premises currently consist of a vacant lot with approximately 1,090 square feet of land in a highly- commercialized section of Boston’s Financial District. The proposed project includes the development of a 14-story hotel with certain related site improvements (“Proposed Project”). The property site is just steps away from the Rose Kennedy Greenway with numerous public transportation options, including the South Station transportation facility, within a short walking distance. The immediate area is lush with numerous institutions and large companies as well as tourist attractions within walking distance that are major demand drivers for additional hotel rooms. 188 High Street is offered on an “as-is” basis and without a formal asking price. Upon receipt of a signed confidentiality agreement, qualified investors will be provided with access to the offering memorandum and due diligence materials. Once investors have had an opportunity to review the offering materials and tour the property, Colliers will schedule a “Call for Offers”. For more additional information on the property, please visit 188high.colliers.com. South Station 8-minute walk to South Station Seaport Beacon Hill North Station State Street Station 6-minute walk to State Street Station Faneuil Hall 7-minute walk to Faneuil Hall Aquarium Station 5-minute walk to Aquarium Station Greenway Rowes Wharf Ferry 4-minute walk to Rowes Wharf Project Rendering HIGH STREET - BOSTON - 188 HOTEL 03.05.2019 PISANI + ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS PROJECT BREAKDOWN Lot Size: 1,090 SF Lobby: 1,090 SF (Lobby) Floors 2- 13: 1,345 SF (4 rooms per floor) Floor 14: 1,345 SF (2 rooms and roof top cafe) Total Project: 18,575 SF (50 hotel rooms) Lot #: 1100481000 INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS Prominent Transit Oriented Address The Property is strategically situated within walking distance of South Station (Boston’s transit hub), the MBTA Blue Line and the MBTA commuter ferry with swift vehicular access to Interstates 90 (Massachusetts Turnpike) and 93 as well as Logan International. 188 High Street will offer future guests unparalleled transit access. Approved Hospitality Development Opportunity The offering is approved to transform from a surface parking lot to a 14 story, 50 key hotel in the heart of downtown Boston, surrounded by countless attractions and amenities. Live – Work – Play Destination The area surrounding 188 High Street has developed in recent years beyond being a traditional home for financial, accounting and law firms. Today, hundreds of thousands of office workers, residents and college students, visit downtown Boston each day to experience the dynamic mix of retail, dining, residential, hotel, health/fitness and cultural options the neighborhood offers. Ultra-Core Location Situated in the heart of Boston’s booming central business district, 188 High Street presents immediate access to Boston’s Financial District, Beacon Hill, Faneuil Hall, Downtown Crossing, and Seaport. The Rose F Kennedy Greenway has become Boston’s “Main Street” and provides green space to downtown. Back Bay South Station Greenway Rowes Wharf Ferry Seaport Cambridge Boston Common Aquarium Station Long Wharf Ferry BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS CONTACT US: CHRIS SOWER Senior Vice President 617 330 8141 [email protected] BRUCE LUSA Vice President 617 330 8043 [email protected] JONATHAN BRYANT Assistant Vice President 617 330 8081 [email protected] JOHN FLAHERTY Associate 617 330 8151 [email protected] Colliers International 160 Federal Street Boston, MA 02110 colliers.com.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inner Harbor Connector Ferry
    Inner Harbor Connector Ferry Business Plan for New Water Transportation Service 1 2 Inner Harbor Connector Contents The Inner Harbor Connector 3 Overview 4 Why Ferries 5 Ferries Today 7 Existing Conditions 7 Best Practices 10 Comprehensive Study Process 13 Collecting Ideas 13 Forecasting Ridership 14 Narrowing the Dock List 15 Selecting Routes 16 Dock Locations and Conditions 19 Long Wharf North and Central (Downtown/North End) 21 Lewis Mall (East Boston) 23 Navy Yard Pier 4 (Charlestown) 25 Fan Pier (Seaport) 27 Dock Improvement Recommendations 31 Long Wharf North and Central (Downtown/North End) 33 Lewis Mall (East Boston) 34 Navy Yard Pier 4 (Charlestown) 35 Fan Pier (Seaport) 36 Route Configuration and Schedule 39 Vessel Recommendations 41 Vessel Design and Power 41 Cost Estimates 42 Zero Emissions Alternative 43 Ridership and Fares 45 Multi-modal Sensitivity 47 Finances 51 Overview 51 Pro Forma 52 Assumptions 53 Funding Opportunities 55 Emissions Impact 59 Implementation 63 Appendix 65 1 Proposed route of the Inner Harbor Connector ferry 2 Inner Harbor Connector The Inner Harbor Connector Authority (MBTA) ferry service between Charlestown and Long Wharf, it should be noted that the plans do not specify There is an opportunity to expand the existing or require that the new service be operated by a state entity. ferry service between Charlestown and downtown Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) Boston to also serve East Boston and the South and the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) were Boston Seaport and connect multiple vibrant both among the funders of this study and hope to work in neighborhoods around Boston Harbor.
    [Show full text]
  • Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present
    Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • Red / Blue Line Connector Assessment – Land Use, Population, and Ridership Memo 2 2
    SUMMARY MEMORANDUM: POPULATION, LAND USE, AND RIDERSHIP CHANGES UPDATE TO THE 2010 DEIR FOR THE RED LINE/BLUE LINE CONNECTOR Published October 2018 1. Introduction In 2010, Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) conducted a study to evaluate the connection of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’s (MBTA’s) Red Line and Blue Line in Boston. The Red/Blue Line Connector Project consisted of extending the Blue Line beyond its current terminus at Bowdoin Station along Cambridge Street to the Red Line at Charles/ MGH Station. In March 2010, MassDOT submitted a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) pursuant to the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA). In May 2010, MEPA approved the DEIR. At the time, MassDOT had not identified funding for the construction of the Project. Recent changes in development and growth in Revere, East Boston, and Cambridge, as well as advancements in construction technologies, have generated a renewed interest in revisiting the need for the Red/Blue Line Connector. MassDOT’s Office of Transportation and Planning (OTP), working with the MBTA, has initiated a study to reassess the Project by revisiting previous assumptions developed during the 2010 DEIR. The purpose of this memorandum is to update the data and assumptions regarding population, land use, and ridership from the 2010 DEIR’s Purpose and Need. The 2010 DEIR focused primarily on four Census tracks surrounding the Cambridge Street corridor project area. However, due to their current access to the Blue and Red lines, the communities in this area would likely not have a large effect on demand for and use of the connection.
    [Show full text]
  • 51 Sleeper Street for Lease Boston, Massachusetts 20,104 Sf | 7Th Floor
    51 SLEEPER STREET FOR LEASE BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS 20,104 SF | 7TH FLOOR AVAILABLE SPACES Floor Square Feet Timing 7 20,104 Vacant 51 Sleeper Street is an eight-story first-class office building located in the heart of the Seaport District’s Fort Point neighborhood. The building features sweeping waterside views of downtown Boston from every floor and efficient, rectangular, 20,000 square foot floor plates. 51 Sleeper Street is ideally situated in one of the most desirable neighborhoods in the market, due to the area’s accessibility, energy and growing roster of retail and nightlife options. The property’s proximity to both the amenity-rich Financial District and the evolving Seaport District make 51 Sleeper Street an optimal location for a multitude of companies. In addition, the building is located just steps from the transportation hub at South Station, while also providing easy access to Interstates 93 and 90 as well as a ten (10) minute ride to Logan International Airport. For more information or to schedule a tour, please contact: Michael Joyce Thomas Ashe Abby Callahan 617.439.9704 617.439.3113 617.933.0173 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 617.439.6000 | www.transwestern.com Marriott Long Wharf HOTEL y Water Taxi to Faneuil Hall a North Station w Marketplace n LOGAN e New England FOR LEASE 51 SLEEPER e STREET Marriott r Aquarium INTERNATIONAL G Custom House y d AIRPORT e BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTSn 20,104 SF | 7THlocated FLOOR directly n e across harbor K d l a Post Office r Broad St.
    [Show full text]
  • MBTA Transit Asset Management Plan Massachusetts Bay
    The following document was created by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA). This document file may not be fully accessible. If you would like to request this file in a different format, please contact the Central Transportation Planning Staff (CTPS) via email at [email protected]. CTPS will coordinate your request with the MBTA. SEPTEMBER 2018 MBTA Transit Asset Management Plan Massachusetts Bay Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Transportation Authority MBTA TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN This page intentionally left blank This page intentionally left blank PAGE 4 OF 143 MBTA TRANSIT ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 15 MBTA Background ................................................................................................................................. 15 Scope of Transit Asset Management Plan ...................................................................................... 16 Objectives .................................................................................................................................................. 17 Accountable Executive and Strategic Alignment ........................................................................ 18 Plan
    [Show full text]
  • Downtown Waterfront District Municipal Harbor Plan
    DRAFT 9-06-2016 DOWNTOWN WATERFRONT DISTRICT MUNICIPAL HARBOR PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. SUMMARY 2. MHP BACKGROUND & GOALS 2.1. The Downtown Waterfront Planning Area Boundary & Parcels 2.2. Chapter 91 Jurisdiction 2.3. Historical Context & Historic Resources in the Planning Area 2.4. Urban Context 2.5. Related Planning Efforts and Existing Zoning 2.6. Development Adjacent to the Planning Area 2.7. The Magenta Zone 2.8. The MHP Process 2.9. 2013 MHP Goals 2.10. 2014 Downtown Waterfront Public Realm & Watersheet Activation Plan Recommendations 3. AMPLIFICATIONS, SUBSTITUTE PROVISIONS, & OFFSETS 3.1. Approach 3.2. Baseline Requirements with Amplifications 3.2.1. Activation of Commonwealth Tidelands for Public Use [310 CMR 9.53(2)(b) and 310 CMR 9.53(2)(c)] 3.2.2. Engineering and Construction Standards [310 CMR 9.37(3)(c)] 3.2.3. Standards to Protect Water-dependent Uses [310 CMR 9.36(1) & (3)] 3.2.4. Upper Floor Uses Over Flowed Commonwealth Tidelands 3.3. Substitute Provisions 3.3.1. Building Height [310 CMR 9.51(3)(e)] 3.3.2. Building Footprint Lot Coverage [310 CMR 9.51(3)(d)] 3.3.3. Facilities of Private Tenancy [310 CMR 9.51(3)(b)] 3.3.4. Water-Dependent Use Zone [310 CMR 9.51(3)(c)] 3.4. Offsets 3.4.1. Marriott Long Wharf 3.4.2. Hook Wharf 3.4.3. Harbor Garage 3.4.4. Additional Offsets 3.5 Summary of Chapter 91 Substitutions, Offsets and Amplifications 4. CHAPTER 91 LONG-TERM LICENSE FEES 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Station
    MBTA ATM/Branding Opportunities 43 ATM Locations Available Line City Station Available Spaces Station Entries Blue East Boston Airport 1 7,429 Blue Revere Revere Beach 1 3,197 Blue Revere Wonderland 1 6,105 Blue East Boston Maverick 1 10,106 Blue Boston Aquarium 1 4,776 Green Boston Prudential 2 3,643 Green Boston Kenmore 1 9,503 Green Newton Riverside 1 2,192 Green Boston Haymarket 1 11,469 Green Boston North Station 1 17,079 Orange Boston Forest Hills 2 15,150 Orange Boston Jackson Square 2 5,828 Orange Boston Ruggles 1 10,433 Orange Boston Stony Brook 2 3,652 Orange Malden Oak Grove 1 6,590 Orange Medford Wellington 1 7,609 Orange Charlestown Community College 1 4,956 Orange Somerville Assembly 1 * Red Boston South Station 1 23,703 Red Boston Charles/MGH 1 12,065 Red Cambridge Alewife 2 11,221 Red Cambridge Harvard 1 23,199 Red Quincy Quincy Adams 3 4,785 Red Quincy Wollaston 2 4,624 Red Boston Downtown Crossing 2 23,478 Red Somerville Davis Square 2 12,857 Red Cambridge Kendall/MIT 1 15,433 Red Cambridge Porter Square 1 8,850 Red Dorchester Ashmont 2 9,293 Silver Boston World Trade Center 1 1,574 Silver Boston Courthouse 1 1,283 Commuter Boat Hingham Hingham Intermodal Terminal 1 ** * Assembly Station opened September 2, 2014. Ridership numbers are now being established ** The Hingham Intermodal Terminal is scheduled to open December 2015 . ATM proposals /branding are subject to MBTA design review and approval. Blue Line- Airport Station K-2 Blue Line- Revere Beach Station Map K-1 Charlie Card Machine Charlie Card Collectors Machines
    [Show full text]
  • Boston University School of Social Work
    Boston University School of Social Work SSW Office of Student Services Charles River Student Guide Adapted from the School of Public Health International Student Organization Guidebook Revised by Molly Egan-Williams (SSW/SED 2016), Katie Ouimet (SSW 2017) & Tarik Brown (SSW 2018) Table of Contents Welcome!.......................................................................................................................................................................................2 Housing………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………3 Where should I live? Transportation…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..3 Location & Accessibility Transit Costs & the BU Semester Link Pass BU Shuttle Bus (B.U.S) Rideshares, Taxis & Rental Vehicles BU Escort Security Service Transportation Apps Biking in Boston Health Insurance………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..6 Boston University Options MassHealth Exploring……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………7 Weather Food Fun and Activities -Student Discounts -Places to Visit -Museums, Art & Culture -Great Views of Boston -Seasonal Fun -Social Aspects -Local Movies 1 Welcome Welcome to Boston University’s School of Social Work! As you are getting ready for your move to Boston, and the beginning of the school year, we want to give you information that we believe will be great to know and will be helpful to your smooth transition to Boston and Boston University’s School of Social Work (BUSSW). Within this guide, you will find tips on which neighborhoods to seek out when
    [Show full text]
  • Transreport Transportation News from the Boston Metropolitan Planning Organization
    DECEMBER 2001 TRANSREPORT TRANSPORTATION NEWS FROM THE BOSTON METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Aquarium Station Reopens on the MBTA’s Blue Line The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Hall Marketplace. The new west-side east side of the Central Artery, will open Authority (MBTA) reopened Aquarium entrances improve access to both the in 2003. Station on October 29. The Blue Line Faneuil Hall area and the Financial Dis- Completely closing the station for subway station had been closed a year allowed the modernization for the past year. The renovated work to proceed more quickly: facility features a longer platform the project can now be completed that makes possible the use of a year ahead of the original 2004 six-car trainsets. The old station scheduled completion date. In was only able to accommodate 2003 the MBTA will start to four-car trainsets. operate six-car trainsets on the Currently, the station can be Blue Line. The $172 million pur- accessed only from a new head- chase of 94 new Blue Line cars house on the west side of the from Siemens Transportation Sys- Central Artery at the intersec- tems, which was authorized by tion of State Street and McKin- the MBTA board of directors in ley Square. The headhouse October, will provide the rolling includes an elevator. A second A Blue Line train enters the reopened Aquarium Station stock required for the operation west-side entrance is nearing com- of longer trains. pletion and will open soon. It is located trict. The old headhouse located adjacent on the other side of State Street, adja- to the Marriott Long Wharf Hotel, as cent to Marketplace Center and Faneuil well as another new headhouse on the Updated Big Dig Exhibit Debuts; Tunnel Construction Delayed The Museum of Sci- contributions from private companies the five-foot-thick concrete floor.
    [Show full text]
  • North South Rail Link Feasibility Reassessment Chapter 5
    Photo Source: Anthony Delanoix / Unsplash Photo Source: Charlotte / Unsplash 60 North South Rail Link Feasibility Reassessment Final Report January 2019 | Service Planning 5. Potential Alignments and Schematic Design Potential Alignments and Schematic Design | January 2019 North South Rail Link Feasibility Reassessment Final Report 61 5. Potential Alignments and Schematic Design 5.1 2003 Alignments and Alternatives All potential alignments to connect the northern The build alternatives consisted of the following four Each of the four alternatives was envisioned as and southern MBTA Commuter Rail lines that were confgurations: one or more 41-foot-diameter deep tubes, with evaluated in the 2003 DEIR followed the Central mined approaches and underground junctions • Two-Track / Two-Station (Back Bay OR South Artery/Tunnel project corridor between South but otherwise constructed primarily with tunnel Bay portals) Station and North Station. While a Congress Street boring machines along the length of the alignment alternative was initially considered, the alignment • Two-Track / Three-Station (Back Bay OR South underneath Central Boston. did not advance past the 2003 screening process Bay portals) All 2003 alternatives included tracks descending because of anticipated construction and operational • Four-Track / Two-Station (Back Bay AND South from a new Back Bay portal at a 3% grade constraints in the limited rights-of-way underneath Bay portals) (towards the new underground South Station). This narrower downtown streets. In addition to a No
    [Show full text]
  • Resilience of Rapid Transit Networks in the Context of Climate Change by Michael Vincent Martello
    Resilience of Rapid Transit Networks in the Context of Climate Change by Michael Vincent Martello Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering Manhattan College (2018) Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY May 2020 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2020. All rights reserved. Author . Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering May 8, 2020 Certified by. Andrew J. Whittle Edmund K. Turner Professor of Civil & Environmental Engineering Thesis Supervisor Certified by. Frederick P. Salvucci Senior Lecturer of Transportation Planning and Engineering Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . Colette L. Heald Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering Chair, Graduate Committee 1 2 Resilience of Rapid Transit Networks in the Context of Climate Change by Michael Vincent Martello Submitted to the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering on May 8th, 2020 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering Abstract Climate change and projected rises in sea level will pose increasing flood risks to coastal cities and infrastructure. This thesis proposes a general framework of engineering resilience for infrastructure systems in the context of climate change and illustrates its application for the rail rapid transit network in Boston. Within this framework, projected coastal flood events are treated as exogenous factors that inform exposure. Endogenous network characteristics are modeled by mapping at-grade tracks, water ingress points, track elevations, crossover switches, and critical dispatch yards to produce a dual network representation of the system, capturing physical and topological characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Real Estate Mantra Location Near Public Transportation
    The New Real Estate Mantra Location Near Public Transportation THE NEW REAL ESTATE MANTRA LOCATION NEAR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION | MARCH, 2013 1 The New Real Estate Mantra Location Near Public Transportation COMMISSIONED BY AMERICAN PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION ASSOCIATION IN PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS PREPARED BY THE CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TECHNOLOGY MARCH 2013 COVER: MOCKINGBIRD STATION, DALLAS, TX Photo by DART CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary 3 Previous Research 6 Findings 8 Phoenix 12 Chicago 17 Boston 23 Minneapolis-St. Paul 27 San Francisco 32 Conclusion 33 Methodology THE NEW REAL ESTATE MANTRA LOCATION NEAR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION | MARCH, 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Authors: Center for Neighborhood Technology Lead Author: Sofia Becker Scott Bernstein, Linda Young Analysis: Center for Neighborhood Technology Sofia Becker, Al Benedict, and Cindy Copp Report Contributors and Reviewers: Center for Neighborhood Technology: Peter Haas, Stephanie Morse American Public Transportation Association: Darnell Grisby National Association of Realtors: Darren W. Smith Report Layout: Center for Neighborhood Technology Kathrine Nichols THE NEW REAL ESTATE MANTRA LOCATION NEAR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION | MARCH, 2013 Executive Summary Fueled by demographic change and concerns over quality of life, there has been a growing interest in communities with active transportation modes. The recession added another dimension to these discussions by emphasizing the economic impli- cations of transportation choices. Housing and transportation, the two economic sectors mostly closely tied to the built environment, were both severely impacted by the economic downturn. There has been a growing effort among planners, real estate professionals, and economists to identify not only the economic benefits of alternative transportation modes in and of themselves, but also the impact that they have on housing prices and value retention.
    [Show full text]