DOCSLIB.ORG

Transreport Transportation News from the Boston Metropolitan Planning Organization

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DECEMBER 2001 TRANSREPORT TRANSPORTATION NEWS FROM THE BOSTON METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION Aquarium Station Reopens on the MBTA’s Blue Line The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Hall Marketplace. The new west-side east side of the Central Artery, will open Authority (MBTA) reopened Aquarium entrances improve access to both the in 2003. Station on October 29. The Blue Line Faneuil Hall area and the Financial Dis- Completely closing the station for subway station had been closed a year allowed the modernization for the past year. The renovated work to proceed more quickly: facility features a longer platform the project can now be completed that makes possible the use of a year ahead of the original 2004 six-car trainsets. The old station scheduled completion date. In was only able to accommodate 2003 the MBTA will start to four-car trainsets. operate six-car trainsets on the Currently, the station can be Blue Line. The $172 million pur- accessed only from a new head- chase of 94 new Blue Line cars house on the west side of the from Siemens Transportation Sys- Central Artery at the intersec- tems, which was authorized by tion of State Street and McKin- the MBTA board of directors in ley Square. The headhouse October, will provide the rolling includes an elevator. A second A Blue Line train enters the reopened Aquarium Station stock required for the operation west-side entrance is nearing com- of longer trains. pletion and will open soon. It is located trict. The old headhouse located adjacent on the other side of State Street, adja- to the Marriott Long Wharf Hotel, as cent to Marketplace Center and Faneuil well as another new headhouse on the Updated Big Dig Exhibit Debuts; Tunnel Construction Delayed The Museum of Sci- contributions from private companies the five-foot-thick concrete floor. ence and the Cen- working on the CA/T project. Through these holes, workers will inject expandable grout that will fill the 14- tral Artery/Tunnel The Big Dig is the largest, most techni- inch space permanently. Project have cally challenging highway project in reopened an exhibit American history. A current unexpected I Big Dig cont. on p. 4 on the Big Dig. challenge is a persistent water leak at Originally opened in Fort Point Channel between the I-90 1993, it has been renovated and now connection and the Ted Williams Tun- INSIDE THIS ISSUE includes interactive hands-on displays. nel. The leak was discovered in June at One of the main features of the exhibit is the entrance pit of the eastbound side of MPO activities update . 2 a model of the Leonard P. Zakim Bunker the connection. A 14-inch space Transportation Plan workshops . 2 Hill Bridge accompanied by a display between the bottom of the tunnel box New Logan Airport roadways . 3 providing a closer look at the cables that and a concrete base slab has been esti- make the bridge a unique landmark. mated to be allowing approximately Arborway trolleys to return . 3 Located at the Museum of Science, the 25,000 gallons per minute to pass Fairmount Line study . 4 exhibit is funded through a grant from through. To fix the leak, engineers are Meeting calendar . 4 the Federal Highway Administration and drilling approximately 80 holes through The members of the Boston Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO): Executive Office of Transportation and Construction • City of Boston • City of Everett • City of Newton • City of Peabody • Federal Highway Administration • Federal Transit Administration • Joint Regional Transportation Committee • Massachusetts Bay Transporta- tion Authority • Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Advisory Board • Massachusetts Highway Department • Massachusetts Port Authority • Massachusetts Turnpike Authority • Metropolitan Area Planning Council • Town of Bedford • Town of Framingham • Town of Hopkinton BOSTON METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION ACTIVITIES MPO Workshops Provide Forum for Discussion of SUB-SIGNATORY COMMITTEE UPDATE the Transportation Plan A committee made up of representatives of all MPO mem- Work on the Transportation Plan Update bers met several times in November to develop a revised for the Boston Region continues in Boston MPO Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). The preparation for submitting a final docu- MOU, which will replace a 1997 agreement, was required by the Federal Highway and ment to the federal transportation agen- Federal Transit Administrations in their recertification report of March 15. Consensus cies by March 15, 2002. The latest efforts on the new MOU was reached on November 15; a committee is preparing the final included public-outreach workshops held document for approval and signing in December. at various locations throughout the The SSC also met to discuss the 2001 Regional Transportation Plan Update, another region and continued coordination with requirement of the March recertification report. MPO staff presented additional infor- the Joint Regional Transportation Com- mation to help the SSC define a package of projects that will be analyzed using travel mittee (the MPO’s public advisory board) models. After analyzing all the model results and other information, the SSC will rec- and the Metropolitan Area Planning ommend a set of projects for the Plan Update. The draft Plan Update will be circulated Council subregional groups. for a 35-day public review and comment period beginning in late January. These efforts have included distributing JRTC UPDATE information on policies for selecting proj- The Joint Regional Transportation Committee’s subcommittee on the 2001 Regional ects to be recommended in the Plan, on Transportation Plan Update is reviewing materials developed for the Plan and preparing for discussion with the full JRTC at the December meeting. The JRTC will submit its comments on the Plan to the MPO. The JRTC has organized committees to plan pro- PLAN grams and specialize in other MPO documents. It is forming another to update its by- UPDATE laws. The JRTC is also considering ways to facilitate member and citizen participation. Other JRTC activity in the past month included extending membership to the town of 2001 Weymouth. AACT UPDATE alternative project sets being tested using At its November 20 meeting, the Access Advisory Committee to the MBTA (AACT) the regional transportation model, and was given a presentation by the MBTA on the 30 percent–design work for moderniza- on the universe of potential projects. The tion of Savin Hill Station on the Red Line. One aspect of the modernization is making list of potential projects includes ones the station accessible; this includes an elevator from street level to the platform. Work that have been previously studied, are on the station is scheduled to be complete in late summer 2003. currently under study, or are in develop- ment, as well as projects that were pro- posed in comments received during the public-outreach efforts for the Plan MBTA to Hold Meetings for Fairmount Line Commuter adopted in January 2001. The public has Rail Upgrade Study been asked to comment on and add to this list, indicating what the region’s pri- The MBTA is developing a plan for possi- achusetts Avenue, Columbia Road, and orities should be over the next 20 to 25 ble service improvements on the Fair- Blue Hill Avenue. New stations at these years. The list may be downloaded from mount commuter rail line and would like locations, as well as others, are some of the Boston MPO Web site at www.ctps. your opinions and input. The Fairmount the suggestions the MBTA has already org/bostonmpo.plan2000/plan. To request Line operates in Boston and Milton, with received. An increase in service frequency that a copy be mailed, call Anne McGa- stations at Uphams Corner in Dorches- is viewed as a way to increase ridership. han at (617) 973-7100. ter, Morton Street in Mattapan, and Fair- Currently, trains run once an hour during mount and Readville in Hyde Park. the off peak and not on weekends. The comments received by the public will be used by the MPO in selecting the The Fairmount Line Commuter Rail The first meeting to discuss the study was set of projects to be included in the Plan. Upgrade Study will explore several held on November 29 in Hyde Park. The proposed schedule is for the MPO to options for improving service along this Additional meetings are scheduled for release a draft of the Plan Update in Jan- right-of-way. Two improvements that are December 10 in Dorchester and December uary 2002 for a 35-day public review being examined are the construction of 18 in Mattapan; see the meeting calendar period, which will be the next opportu- new stations and an increase in service to the left. For more information concern- nity for public input into the Plan frequency. The line crosses several high- ing the study, call Yawa Duse-Anthony at process. volume streets in Boston, including Mass- 1-800-556-7245. TRANSREPORT 2DECEMBER 2001 New Logan Airport Roadway System Opens; Other Massport News The first segment of Logan Airport’s two- after leaving a departure area. This seg- the Massport board of directors in Octo- level roadway system opened to motorists ment has yet to be built, so all vehicles ber went into effect on November 12. on November 11. The purpose of the departing the airport will continue to use The daily rate at Central Parking is now two-level system, which the Massachu- the lower roadway. $22 and the weekly rate is capped at $99. setts Port Authority and the Central Two immediate benefits accrue from the The weekly rate is only available until Artery Project began to build in 1996, is opening of the first segment of the upper satellite parking lots reopen, at which to provide separate routes for vehicles roadway. Work can now begin on the time weekly rates will be offered at those destined for terminal departure areas and direct connection from the Ted Williams economy lots only.
Recommended publications
  • Cambridge, Boston, and Beyond

    Cambridge, Boston, and Beyond

    Harvard2 Cambridge, Boston, and beyond 12B Extracurriculars Events on and off campus through October 12F A trip to the bog Harvesting New England’s iconic berries 12L Science, art, and nature converge The Bruce Museum 12P Sparking interest Heartfelt artifacts at the Boston Fire Museum 12J Innovation —Colonial Style The Saugus Iron Works reveals roots of American industrialization 12R Ethnic Markets Asian, Armenian, Indian, African....and more PHOTOGRAPH BY THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Harvard Magazine 12a HARVARD SQUARED Autumn Hills Orchard Extracurriculars www.autumnhillsorchard.com Forget noisy hayrides and fall-foliage gew- Events on and off campus during September and October gaws and head instead to this real, 84-acre hilltop farm to wander trails, pick apples, BELMONT—Belmont Hill. Sited on a beautiful tree- CAMBRIDGE—Harvard Square. Sophisticated WATERTOWN—Lovely 3-level townhouse has SEASONAL pumpkins. Carved by artists using the “Amer- and picnic on the ridge with views of Mount lined street. Large corner lot. 4 bedrooms. 3.5 baths. condominium with high-end appliances. Private been beautifully renovated and maintained. Jack-O-Lantern Spectacular ican Treasures” theme, these gourds depict Wachusett and Mount Monadnock. Extensively renovated in 2005. Two-car garage. balcony with views of the Charles River. 24-hr High ceilings, period details, wood floors and full www.rwpzoo.org events, places, and cultural icons that have (Through October) Central air. ...................................................$1,499,000 Concierge. Parking. ...................................$1,100,000 basement. .............................................................SOLD The nighttime festival at Roger Williams Park appeared on commemorative U.S. postage Zoo in Providence features 5,000 illuminated stamps. (October 6-November 6) NATURE AND SCIENCE The Arnold Arboretum From left: Downy woodpeckers could appear during fall bird walks at the Arnold Arbore- tum; a 1931 scene at the Boston Light on display at the Hull Lifesaving Museum; the A.R.T.
  • CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT

    CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT

    CHAPTER 2 Progress Since the Last PMT The 2003 PMT outlined the actions needed to bring the MBTA transit system into a state of good repair (SGR). It evaluated and prioritized a number of specific enhancement and expansion projects proposed to improve the system and better serve the regional mobility needs of Commonwealth residents. In the inter- vening years, the MBTA has funded and implemented many of the 2003 PMT priorities. The transit improvements highlighted in this chapter have been accomplished in spite of the unsus- tainable condition of the Authority’s present financial structure. A 2009 report issued by the MBTA Advisory Board1 effectively summarized the Authority’s financial dilemma: For the past several years the MBTA has only balanced its budgets by restructuring debt liquidat- ing cash reserves, selling land, and other one-time actions. Today, with credit markets frozen, cash reserves depleted and the real estate market at a stand still, the MBTA has used up these options. This recession has laid bare the fact that the MBTA is mired in a structural, on-going deficit that threatens its viability. In 2000 the MBTA was re-born with the passage of the Forward Funding legislation.This legislation dedicated 20% of all sales taxes collected state-wide to the MBTA. It also transferred over $3.3 billion in Commonwealth debt from the State’s books to the T’s books. In essence, the MBTA was born broke. Throughout the 1990’s the Massachusetts sales tax grew at an average of 6.5% per year. This decade the sales tax has barely averaged 1% annual growth.
  • Directory of Massachusetts LOBBYISTS   617.646.1000 - BOSTON - WASHINGTON DC GREG M

    Directory of Massachusetts LOBBYISTS   617.646.1000 - BOSTON - WASHINGTON DC GREG M

    Directory of Massachusetts LOBBYISTS 617.646.1000 - www.oneillandassoc.com BOSTON - WASHINGTON DC GREG M. PETER J. VICTORIA E. MARK K. MATTHEW P. D’AGOSTINO D’AGOSTINO IRETON MOLLOY MCKENNA Lobbying & Public Aairs Providing comprehensive state and municipal advocacy. PRACTICE AREAS: TRANSPORTATION | HEALTH CARE PUBLIC SAFETY | REGULATIONS | ENERGY ENVIRONMENT | CANNABIS FINANCIAL SERVICES | EMERGING INDUSTRIES 12 POST OFFICE SQUARE, 6TH FLOOR | BOSTON, MA 02109 | 6175743399 WWW.TENAXSTRATEGIES.COM David Albright Oamshri Amarasingham Cynthia Arcate Jewish Alliance for Law and Social Action American Civil Liberties PowerOptions, Inc. A 18 Tremont Street, Suite 320 Union of Massachusetts 129 South Street, 5th Floor Boston, MA 02108 211 Congress Street Boston, MA 02111 Anthony Arthur Abdelahad (617) 227-3000 Boston, MA 02110 (617) 428-4258 Ventry Associates LLP (617) 482-3170 1 Walnut Street Walter Alcorn Luz A. Arevalo Boston, MA 02108 Consumer Technology Association Robert J. Ambrogi Greater Boston, Legal Services (617) 423-0028 1919 South Eads Street Law Office of Robert Ambrogi 197 Friend Street Arlington, VA 22202 128 Main Street Boston, MA 02114 Tate Abdols (571)239-5209 Gloucester, MA 01930 (617) 603-1569 Onex Partners Advisor, Inc. (978) 317-0972 161 Bay Street Theodore J. Alexio Jr. Derek Armstrong Toronto, ON M5J 2S1 Essential Strategies Inc. Shannon Ames Bank of America, N.A. (416) 362-7711 One State Street, Suite 1100 Low Impact Hydropower Institute 100 Federal Street Boston, MA 02109 329 Massachusetts Avenue, Suite 6 Boston, MA 02110 Brendan Scott Abel (617) 227-6666 Lexington, MA 02420 (617) 434-8613 Massachusetts Medical Society (781) 538-4266 860 Winter Street Waltham, MA 02451 Daniel Allegretti Gabriel Amo Kristina Ragosta Arnoux (781) 434-7682 Exelon Generation Company, LLC Magellan Health 1 Essex Drive The Home Depot 8621 Robert Fulton Drive Bow, NH 03304 166 Valley Street, 6M222 Columbia, MD 21046 Lisa C.
  • Building a Better T in the Era of Covid-19

    Building a Better T in the Era of Covid-19

    Building a Better T in the Era of Covid-19 MBTA Advisory Board September 17, 2020 General Manager Steve Poftak 1 Agenda 1. Capital Project Updates 2. Ridership Update 3. Ride Safer 4. Crowding 5. Current Service and Service Planning 2 Capital Project Updates 3 Surges Complete | May – August 2020 Leveraged low ridership while restrictions are in place due to COVID-19 directives May June July August D Branch (Riverside to Kenmore) Two 9-Day Closures C Branch (Cleveland Circle to Kenmore) E Branch (Heath to Symphony) Track & Signal Improvements, Fenway Portal Flood 28-Day Full Closure 28-Day Full Closure Protection, Brookline Hills TOD Track & Intersection Upgrades Track & Intersection Upgrades D 6/6 – 6/14 D 6/20 – 6/28 C 7/5 – 8/1 E 8/2 – 8/29 Blue Line (Airport to Bowdoin) Red Line (Braintree to Quincy) 14-Day Closure Harbor Tunnel Infrastructure Upgrades On-call Track 2, South Shore Garages, Track Modernization BL 5/18 – 5/31 RL 6/18 -7/1 4 Shuttle buses replaced service Ridership Update 5 Weekday Ridership by Line and Mode - Indexed to Week of 2/24 3/17: Restaurants and 110 bars closed, gatherings Baseline: limited to 25 people Average weekday from 2/24-2/28 100 MBTA service reduced Sources: 90 3/24: Non-essential Faregate counts for businesses closed subway lines, APC for 80 buses, manual counts at terminals for Commuter Rail, RIDE 70 vendor reports 6/22: Phase 2.2 – MBTA 6/8: Phase 2.1 60 increases service Notes: Recent data preliminary 50 5/18-6/1: Blue Line closed for 40 accelerated construction Estimated % of baseline ridership
  • Inner Harbor Connector Ferry

    Inner Harbor Connector Ferry

    Inner Harbor Connector Ferry Business Plan for New Water Transportation Service 1 2 Inner Harbor Connector Contents The Inner Harbor Connector 3 Overview 4 Why Ferries 5 Ferries Today 7 Existing Conditions 7 Best Practices 10 Comprehensive Study Process 13 Collecting Ideas 13 Forecasting Ridership 14 Narrowing the Dock List 15 Selecting Routes 16 Dock Locations and Conditions 19 Long Wharf North and Central (Downtown/North End) 21 Lewis Mall (East Boston) 23 Navy Yard Pier 4 (Charlestown) 25 Fan Pier (Seaport) 27 Dock Improvement Recommendations 31 Long Wharf North and Central (Downtown/North End) 33 Lewis Mall (East Boston) 34 Navy Yard Pier 4 (Charlestown) 35 Fan Pier (Seaport) 36 Route Configuration and Schedule 39 Vessel Recommendations 41 Vessel Design and Power 41 Cost Estimates 42 Zero Emissions Alternative 43 Ridership and Fares 45 Multi-modal Sensitivity 47 Finances 51 Overview 51 Pro Forma 52 Assumptions 53 Funding Opportunities 55 Emissions Impact 59 Implementation 63 Appendix 65 1 Proposed route of the Inner Harbor Connector ferry 2 Inner Harbor Connector The Inner Harbor Connector Authority (MBTA) ferry service between Charlestown and Long Wharf, it should be noted that the plans do not specify There is an opportunity to expand the existing or require that the new service be operated by a state entity. ferry service between Charlestown and downtown Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) Boston to also serve East Boston and the South and the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) were Boston Seaport and connect multiple vibrant both among the funders of this study and hope to work in neighborhoods around Boston Harbor.
  • District of Massachusetts CJA Panel List

    District of Massachusetts CJA Panel List

    District of Massachusetts CJA Panel List Panel(s) Name Address Phone Email Boston Amabile, John A Amabile & Burkly, PC 508-559-6966 [email protected] 380 Pleasant Street Brockton, MA 02301 Worcester Angiulo, Leonardo A. Angiulo Law, PLLC 508-868-0899 [email protected] PO Box 2903 Worcester, MA 01613 Boston Apfel, David J Goodwin Procter LLP 617-570-1970 [email protected] 1000 Northern Avenue Boston, MA 02210 Boston Bailey, R Bradford Brad Bailey Law P.C. 857-991-1945 [email protected] 44 School Street Suite 1000B Boston, MA 02108 Boston Barron, Kevin 50 Congress St 617-407-6837 [email protected] Habeas Sutie 600 Boston, MA 02109 Boston Benzaken, Jason Benzaken, Alexander & Wood, PC 508-897-0001 [email protected] 1342 Belmont Street Suite 102 Brockton, MA 02301 Boston Bernstein, Inga Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein LLP 617-820-5168 [email protected] 65A Atlantic Avenue Boston, MA 02110 Boston Bourbeau, Michael C Bourbeau & Bonilla, LLP 617-350-6565 [email protected] 80 Washington St Building K Norwell, MA 02061 District of Massachusetts CJA Panel List Panel(s) Name Address Phone Email Boston Braceras, Roberto M Goodwin Procter LLP 617-570-1895 [email protected] 1000 Northern Avenue Boston, MA 02210 Boston Budreau, James H Bassil & Budreau 617-276-7385 [email protected] 20 Park Place Suite 1005 Boston, MA 02116 Boston Caramanica, James M. 120 North Main Street 508-222-0096 [email protected] Suite 306 Attelboro, MA 02703 Boston Carney, Jr., J. W. J. W. Carney & Associates
  • Downtown Development Fact Sheet Compiled by the Downtown Boston

    Downtown Development Fact Sheet Compiled by the Downtown Boston

    Downtown Development Fact Sheet Compiled by the Downtown Boston BID Updated August 2021 Under Construction Inside The BID: Winthrop Center (115 Winthrop Square): • A 691-foot, 50-story, 1.6 million sq.-ft. mixed-use tower including 321 residential units, 750,000 sq.-ft. of commercial space, a 550-space parking garage, and a 12,000 sq.-ft. Connector lobby space. Winthrop Center is slated to open in early 2023. High Street Place (160 Federal St./100 High St.): • A 18,500 sq.-ft. food hall being developed for the lobby space connecting 160 Federal Street and 100 High Street. The food hall will feature 22 food vendor stalls/kiosks and seating for 400. It is slated to open in September 2021. Development Proposals: 175 Federal Street Renovation: • Proposal calls for a 12,000 sq.-ft. canted structural glass enclosure encompassing 175 Federal Street’s first three floors. Within the structure will be a raised public platform offering sweeping of the Greenway and adjacent neighborhoods. The proposal also calls for the relocation of the building’s lobby. 11 Bromfield Street Development (1 Bromfield St.): • Proposal calls for a 23-floor, 441,000 sf mixed-use office tower, with 59,00 sf of retail space on the first three floors (one of them below-grade). The proposal is currently in its scoping review phase with the BPDA. Completed Projects: 2020: 399 Washington Street Renovation: • A complete renovation and modernization of the 5-story, 75,000 sf building. Internal demolition began in summer 2017 and finished in 2018. The renovation completed in early 2020.
  • India Street Historic District Designation Report

    India Street Historic District Designation Report

    India Street Historic District Designation Report General Description of the District The India Street neighborhood as we know it today encompasses a 19-block area, extending west to east from Franklin Arterial to Washington Avenue/Mountfort Street and north to south from Congress Street to Commercial Street. Within this larger neighborhood boundary, the proposed India Street Historic District encompasses portions of 10 blocks and is focused on the major corridors (Congress, India and Middle) that define the historic core of the neighborhood and around which many of the neighborhood’s most significant institutional, commercial, religious and residential structures are concentrated. Within or just outside the district boundaries are located five previously-designated landmark structures or sites. These include the Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception, St. Paul’s Church and Parish Hall, North School, the Abyssinian Meeting House and Eastern Cemetery. Four additional landmarks are proposed for designation in conjunction with the district designation. These include the former Etz Chaim Synagogue (now Maine Jewish Heritage Museum), the former India Street Fire Station, St. Peter’s Catholic Church, the former Shaarey Tphiloh Synagogue, and See full-sized map of district attached to this report. the Abraham S. Levey Commercial Block. These structures are recommended for landmark status based on their significance in the development of the neighborhood, their architectural significance and/or their position at a key gateway into the neighborhood.
  • Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present

    Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA District 1964-Present

    Changes to Transit Service in the MBTA district 1964-2021 By Jonathan Belcher with thanks to Richard Barber and Thomas J. Humphrey Compilation of this data would not have been possible without the information and input provided by Mr. Barber and Mr. Humphrey. Sources of data used in compiling this information include public timetables, maps, newspaper articles, MBTA press releases, Department of Public Utilities records, and MBTA records. Thanks also to Tadd Anderson, Charles Bahne, Alan Castaline, George Chiasson, Bradley Clarke, Robert Hussey, Scott Moore, Edward Ramsdell, George Sanborn, David Sindel, James Teed, and George Zeiba for additional comments and information. Thomas J. Humphrey’s original 1974 research on the origin and development of the MBTA bus network is now available here and has been updated through August 2020: http://www.transithistory.org/roster/MBTABUSDEV.pdf August 29, 2021 Version Discussion of changes is broken down into seven sections: 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA 2) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Eastern Mass. St. Ry. Co. Norwood Area Quincy Area Lynn Area Melrose Area Lowell Area Lawrence Area Brockton Area 3) MBTA bus routes inherited from the Middlesex and Boston St. Ry. Co 4) MBTA bus routes inherited from Service Bus Lines and Brush Hill Transportation 5) MBTA bus routes initiated by the MBTA 1964-present ROLLSIGN 3 5b) Silver Line bus rapid transit service 6) Private carrier transit and commuter bus routes within or to the MBTA district 7) The Suburban Transportation (mini-bus) Program 8) Rail routes 4 ROLLSIGN Changes in MBTA Bus Routes 1964-present Section 1) MBTA bus routes inherited from the MTA The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) succeeded the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) on August 3, 1964.
  • Traffic Assessment 16JAN2014 Without Cover.Docx TABLE of CONTENTS

    Traffic Assessment 16JAN2014 Without Cover.Docx TABLE of CONTENTS

    P:\2011 Projects\2011-081 181 Washington St Somerville\_Traffic\Traffic Assessment 16JAN2014_without cover.docx TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ………………………………………………….….……... 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION …….…………………………………………………….…………. 2 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ……………………………………………………….…… 2 4.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT …………………………………………….……...….. 3 5.0 ROADWAY NETWORK ……….……………………………………………....…….. 4 6.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES …………………………………...……………………...…….. 7 7.0 PUBLIC TRANSIT ………………………………………………..…………………... 8 8.0 ACCIDENT EXPERIENCE …………………………………………………………….9 9.0 PARKING ………………………………………….………………………..…….….. 10 10.0 TRIP GENERATION/DISTRIBUTION ……………………………………….…… 15 11.0 TRAFFIC IMPACTS/CAPACITY ANALYSES …………………………………… 18 12.0 OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS ………………………………………..…………….. 20 List of Figures Figure 1 – Site Plan Figure 2 – On-Street Parking Study Area P:\2011 Projects\2011-081 181 Washington St Somerville\_Traffic\Traffic Assessment 16JAN2014_without cover.docx 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DCI has examined the traffic and parking impacts of the proposed mixed-use development to be located at 181 and 197 Washington Street in Somerville, MA. Following is a summary of the results and conclusion of this effort. The proposed site encompasses two parcels. The portion of the site at 181 Washington Street was previously occupied by a 24,000 SF Boys and Girls Club of Somerville. The portion of the site at 197 Washington Street was previously occupied by a funeral home. Both existing buildings will be razed. The proposed mixed-use development project will consist of 65 residential apartment units, approximately 5,915 SF of commercial retail space. The proposed access/egress is via a driveway on Washington Street. The traffic study area includes the intersection of Washington Street/Boston Street/Mansfield Street (unsignalized) and Washington Street/McGrath Highway (signalized). Accident data indicate that the Washington Street/Boston Street/Mansfield Street intersection is not a hazardous location.
  • Green Line Extension Project EEA #13886

    Green Line Extension Project EEA #13886

    Draft Environmental Impact Report/ Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Statement Green Line Extension Project EEA #13886 Volume 1 | Text October 2009 Executive Office of Transportation and Public Works U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT/ ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (DEIR/EA) AND DRAFT SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION FOR THE GREEN LINE EXTENSION PROJECT CAMBRIDGE, SOMERVILLE, MEDFORD, MASSACHUSETTS STATE PROJECT NO. 13886 Prepared Pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 23, Part 771, Section 119 (23 CFR 771.119); 49 U.S.C. Section 303 [formerly Department of Transportation Act of 1966, Section 4(f)] and the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act M.G.L. CH 30 Sec. 61 through 62H by the FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and the COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS (EOT) Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Green Line Extension Project Assessment and Draft Section 4(f) Evaluation Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations Secretary’s Certificate on the EENF Executive Summary 1 Introduction and Background .......................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Project Summary .................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3
  • Red / Blue Line Connector Assessment – Land Use, Population, and Ridership Memo 2 2

    Red / Blue Line Connector Assessment – Land Use, Population, and Ridership Memo 2 2

    SUMMARY MEMORANDUM: POPULATION, LAND USE, AND RIDERSHIP CHANGES UPDATE TO THE 2010 DEIR FOR THE RED LINE/BLUE LINE CONNECTOR Published October 2018 1. Introduction In 2010, Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) conducted a study to evaluate the connection of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority’s (MBTA’s) Red Line and Blue Line in Boston. The Red/Blue Line Connector Project consisted of extending the Blue Line beyond its current terminus at Bowdoin Station along Cambridge Street to the Red Line at Charles/ MGH Station. In March 2010, MassDOT submitted a Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) pursuant to the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA). In May 2010, MEPA approved the DEIR. At the time, MassDOT had not identified funding for the construction of the Project. Recent changes in development and growth in Revere, East Boston, and Cambridge, as well as advancements in construction technologies, have generated a renewed interest in revisiting the need for the Red/Blue Line Connector. MassDOT’s Office of Transportation and Planning (OTP), working with the MBTA, has initiated a study to reassess the Project by revisiting previous assumptions developed during the 2010 DEIR. The purpose of this memorandum is to update the data and assumptions regarding population, land use, and ridership from the 2010 DEIR’s Purpose and Need. The 2010 DEIR focused primarily on four Census tracks surrounding the Cambridge Street corridor project area. However, due to their current access to the Blue and Red lines, the communities in this area would likely not have a large effect on demand for and use of the connection.