Alpine Tunnel

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alpine Tunnel DSP&P Alpine Tunnel 11 , 608 feet high and 1 , 800 feet long By John Norwood out there to haul goods to, and gold, silver tin ental Divide? So they forgot the old moun­ Photos courtesy of the and coal, cattle , sheep and lumber for the tain dwellers' axtom, "Never climb over Colorado Historical Society backhaul. anything you can go around." Illustration by Tonnie Draper The D&RG led the way and set the stage These magnates were optimistic gamblers. by opening the Rio Grande segment, the San They believed the resources of the new em­ uring the first three decades of rail Juan, Grand River Valley and Utah. Mining pire would last forever. Droad building in Colorado, there was of all types boomed, farmers flocked in and Eight great "backbones" were either pierc­ a lemming-like aspect to the suicidal ten­ cattle or sheep raisers were already there or ed or grades laid over them at exorbitant coming. dency of the builders to start at a point costs, gauged by the value of money at the NO LOGIC USED time. New and novel engineering and con­ on the Front Range and pick a point on Each of these began immediately to de­ struction methods were devised as each new the Western Slope to which they intend­ mand railroads and starry-eyed railroad problem arose. Each new area reached by rail ed to go. Then they started laying down magnates listened without applying any logical produced enough revenue during the first track toward it. engineering or economic standards to their decade after arrival to pay the building costs. Hell and high water or the highest, roughest decisions to give the people what they But after the first exuberant activity, the terrain of the main Rocky Mountain ranges wanted. What did it matter that each of these resources began to be depleted and profits for could not stop them. Cost of building? No one newly opening areas was just beyond or en­ the railroads became less year by year. Event­ worried, for there was a whole new empire circled by the high barren peaks of the Con- (Continued on page 16) 15 A settlement was reached whereby the D&RG was conceded Leadville. DSP&P was granted the Pitkin-Gunnison (Colorado) country. The AT&SF had lost the Royal Gorge War and John Evans primarily wanted the Pitkin-Gunnison area. As a reward for beating the Santa Fe at Royal Gorge, Gould went along with the D&RG having priority to Leadville. The D&RG was building toward California Gulch (Leadville) and granted DSP&P trackage rights from Nathrop (on Arkansas River) to Leadville. D&RG entered Leadville in July, 1880. DSP&P was creeping from Nathrop on a shelf above Chalk Creek westward. It reached St. Elmo in December, 1880 and paused there awaiting work on the Alpine Tunnel. John Evans had started work on this tunnel in 1879. Romley and Hancock were reached in August 1881. Drilling of Alpine Tunnel was in charge of an engineer, James A. Evans (no relation to John), an old friend of General Dodge from KP and D&RG days. One of his first tasks was building a wagon road to aid construction . The contractor who built the road was one of the tunnel contractors. He spent $25,000 on the road and $50,000 for tunnel supplies, then went bankrupt. Location of the tunnel was under Altman Pass (12, 124 feet). This pass was found by a stage driver, "Colonel" Henry Altman while hunting for a wagon route from St. Elmo to Pitkin. CONSTANT ATTENTION The east portal located two miles from Romley at an elevation of 11,600 feet was presumed to be in a geologic structure that would have had the tunnel bored through solid rock. This proved inaccurrate, for the tunnel on completion was in a structure that was 95 per cent deteriorated granite and loose stone. A flow of water throught the structure was also present. Due to the short length of the tunnel, this flow presented operating prob­ lems by ice accumulation during winter This 1975 photo of the DSP&P Alpine Tunnel shows about 300 feet of the interior from the months. It also made constant attention and first big rock fall toward the apex of the tunnel and the east portal beyond. maintenance of the track structure mandatory. The unstable nature of the structure re­ quired importation and use of 12" x 12" red­ (Continued from page 15) • DSP&P - Alpine Tunnel - 11,608 feet. wood timbers and lagging. The tunnel, 1,800 ually the rails were pulled up and the once • Moffat Road (D&NW-D&SL) - Corona feet long, was 12 feet wide and 17 feet high. prosperous communities they served deteri­ (Rollins) Pass- 11,680 feet. (Hagerman The apex at the center point was at an eleva­ orated to ghost town status. Tunnel and Corona were standard tion of 11,608 feet. When train operation These eight cloud-busting rail lines that gauge, the others were narrow gauge. began, and as the tune! was used, a bright red competed for the honor of claiming theirs was Moffat Road was Johnny-come-lately. light was kept burning at the apex to serve as the highest were: Corona was not topped until 1904.) a marker to locomotive engineers to know • D&RG, Cumbres Pass - 10,015 feet. Building and operating the Central Pacific when the apex had been reached. A total of (The Cumbres and T oltec Scenic still portion of the first transcontinental railroad 11,608 feet at the apex represented a record operates a subsidized passenger attrac­ was heroic, but there were features related to achieved by any American railroad until the tion during the summer and early fall . the eight in Colorado that equalled or sur­ Moffat Road topped Corona (Rollins) Pass. Its future is uncertain.) passed those of the CP. The West Portal was at the headwaters of • D&RG, Marshall Pass - 10,856 feet. The Alpine Tunnel was one such. As 1880 Middle Quartz Creek near Brittle Silver Basin • Silverton Railroad - Sheridan Pass - neared, there was intense rivalry between at the foot of Tomichi Pass on the trail from 11 , 113 feet. Palmer (D&RG), John Evans/ Jay Gould White Pine. To reach the tunnel, the railroad • Colorado Midland- Hagerman Tunnel (DSP&P) and the AT&SF RR for access to climbed vertically 4,500 feet from the Arkan­ - 11, 500 feet. Leadville. (The D&RG and AT&SF had a sas River in a distance of 21 miles. At the West • DSP&P /C&S - Boreas Pass - 11,482 second contest going involving the Pueblo­ Portal was a snow-shed 650 feet long; at East feet. Denver route and Palmer's drive to Santa Fe. Portal was one 150 feet long. No ventilating • DSP&P /C&S/DRG (Blue River Line) The Tri-Partite Treaty solved the latter system was required, as a strong, constant - Fremont Pass - 11,320 feet. contest.) (Continued on page 18) 16 ABOVE. The rear car of this passenger train just clears the snowshed located at the east portal of the Alpine Tunnel. The train was stopped here on April 30, 1896 for a brake test before starting the descent on the steep grade to Hancock. BELOW. Hancock, Colorado, shown here in 1888, would become a ghost town with the last train run out in 1926. 17 (Continued from page 16) Hancock eastward to carry the last remain­ munity was called Murphy's Switch. A wind kept it clear of smoke. However, one ing miners and their possessions away. Han­ telpherage system 5,000 feet long moved ore locomotive engineer, "Dad" Martinez, did die, cock became a ghost town. A few crumbling from mine to rail side. apparently of carbon monoxide fumes on his cabins and a mine up behind the city is all that Alpine Tunnel station was necessary to ac­ engine while it was stalled in the tunnel. remains, plus the scars on the mountains of commodate the employees it was necessary This death, plus the death of 45 miners due the railroad grade. to permanently assign there. In addition, train to a premature firing of explosive materials, ST. ELMO and engine crews during the winter months and several other deaths from rock falls or St. Elmo was called Forest City when the had to be housed and fed during snow block­ shifting timbers, did result in a legendary story tunnel was being drilled. It was so incor­ ades or for other reasons. There was a stone of bad luck in the tunnel-"The Curse of the porated in 1880 and was the biggest and most enginehouse with coal bins and water tank, Alpine". colorful city in the district. The U.S. Postal a bunkhouse and quarter for an agent, a tel­ Alpine Tunnel was holed through Decem­ Service demanded a name change, and St. egrapher and a watchman, whose duty it was ber 21 , 1881 at a cost of $242,090: a great Elmo was the result. It was an active station to patrol the tunnel and approaches. sum at that time for building just one-third of and community, and flourished during the There was a company eating house oper­ a mile of railroad track. But John Evans was 80s and 90s. Population varied depending on ated by a robust type woman who bragged not losing any sleep; he sold the DSP&P to mining activity from 1,500 to 3,000. she cooked and served the best antelope Jay Gould on November 9, 1880.
Recommended publications
  • Draba Weberi Price & Rollins
    Draba weberi Price & Rollins (Weber’s draba): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project July 31, 2006 Karin Decker Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Decker, K. (2006, July 31). Draba weberi Price & Rollins (Weber’s draba): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/ assessments/drabaweberi.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the employees of Colorado Springs Utilities (Mike Herrin, Bruce Newell, and Kirsta Scherff-Norris) and Colorado Division of Water Resources (Mark Haynes) who responded quickly and openly to my inquiries about the upper Blue Lake Reservoir. USDA Forest Service personnel, including Steve Olson, Paul Semmer, Terry Edelmon, and Greg Laurie, were also extremely helpful in determining the status of Draba weberi and its environs. Dr. Michael Windham of the Utah Museum of Natural History provided helpful clarification of the status of the genus Draba. Bill Jennings provided photographs and records of his observations. Georgia Doyle and Ellen Mayo provided information from the most recent observations of D. weberi. Thanks also to David Anderson and Jill Handwerk of the Colorado Natural Heritage Program for assisting with the preparation of this assessment. AUTHOR’S BIOGRAPHY Karin Decker is an ecologist with the Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP). She works with CNHP’s Ecology and Botany teams, providing ecological, statistical, GIS, and computing expertise for a variety of projects. She has worked with CNHP since 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Mountain Reservoir Substitution and Power Interference Agreements Final EA
    Green Mountain Reservoir Substitution and Power Interference Agreements Final EA Table of Contents Acronyms...................................................................................................................................... vi 1.0 Purpose and Need .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Introduction.......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Project Purpose and Need .................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Study Area........................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4 Background.......................................................................................................... 1-2 1.4.1 Prior Appropriation System .....................................................................1-2 1.4.2 Reclamation and Green Mountain Reservoir...........................................1-2 1.4.3 Western Area Power Administration.......................................................1-4 1.4.4 Springs Utilities’ Collection Systems and Customers .............................1-4 1.4.5 Blue River Decree....................................................................................1-7 1.4.6 Substitution Year Operations...................................................................1-8 1.4.7 Substitution Memorandums of Agreement............................................1-10
    [Show full text]
  • Ce Standards Outlined in FHWA’S Monitoring Plan and As Required by the USACE Section 404 Permit Conditions
    Fremont Pass Rec Pathway Figure 1. Project Location and Vicinity 2 Fremont Pass Rec Pathway Purpose and Need The purpose of the proposed project is to improve the safety of cyclists traveling along State Highway (SH) 91 in Tenmile Canyon. Currently, cyclists travelling south from Copper Mountain toward Fremont Pass must ride on SH 91 through Tenmile Canyon. This situation presents safety concerns for cyclists and drivers through this approximately 3.3-mile segment of highway as it has limited shoulder widths, tight curves, high speeds, and short line of sight distances. In addition, there is a need to provide additional multi-use pathways in Summit County, Colorado. Not only does Summit County aim to accomplish its objectives to maintain, enhance, connect, and expand the recreation pathway system, the Tenmile Canyon corridor south of Copper Mountain has been identified as a high priority pathway in Governor Hickenlooper’s “Colorado the Beautiful: Colorado’s 16” trails initiative. The recreation pathway system in Summit County continues to experience increased demand and utilization. The proposed project would complement the current recreation pathway in Summit County by offering an extension of this system with the proposed pathway towards Fremont Pass. In addition to benefiting cyclists, the multi-modal pathway will allow walkers, runners, and other non-motorized recreational users to access this section of Tenmile Canyon. Description of the Proposed Action Construction of the new recreation pathway would be on National Forest system lands managed by the USFS. The proposed pathway alignment would use the existing, abandoned railroad grade in Tenmile Canyon. This alignment is on the east side of both Tenmile Creek and SH 91.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Rockies Lynx Linkage Areas
    Southern Rockies Lynx Amendment Appendix D - Southern Rockies Lynx Linkage Areas The goal of linkage areas is to ensure population viability through population connectivity. Linkage areas are areas of movement opportunities. They exist on the landscape and can be maintained or lost by management activities or developments. They are not “corridors” which imply only travel routes, they are broad areas of habitat where animals can find food, shelter and security. The LCAS defines Linkage areas as: “Habitat that provides landscape connectivity between blocks of habitat. Linkage areas occur both within and between geographic areas, where blocks of lynx habitat are separated by intervening areas of non-habitat such as basins, valleys, agricultural lands, or where lynx habitat naturally narrows between blocks. Connectivity provided by linkage areas can be degraded or severed by human infrastructure such as high-use highways, subdivisions or other developments. (LCAS Revised definition, Oct. 2001). Alpine tundra, open valleys, shrubland communities and dry southern and western exposures naturally fragment lynx habitat within the subalpine and montane forests of the Southern Rocky Mountains. Because of the southerly latitude, spruce-fir, lodgepole pine, and mixed aspen-conifer forests constituting lynx habitat are typically found in elevational bands along the flanks of mountain ranges, or on the summits of broad, high plateaus. In those circumstances where large landforms are more isolated, they still typically occur within 40 km (24 miles) of other suitable habitat (Ruggerio et al. 2000). This distribution maintains the potential for lynx movement from one patch to another through non-forest environments. Because of the fragmented nature of the landscape, there are inherently important natural topographic features and vegetation communities that link these fragmented forested landscapes of primary habitat together, providing for dispersal movements and interchange among individuals and subpopulations of lynx occupying these forested landscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Denver, South Park & Pacific Railroad
    Denver Public Library, Western History Department. History Western Library, Public Denver W.H. Rau, publisher, from C.S. Ryland Collection. Ryland C.S. from publisher, Rau, W.H. pulls away from the Nathrop Station, by Joseph Collier, courtesy of the the of courtesy Collier, Joseph by Station, Nathrop the from away pulls 1880’s. late the in Canon Platte lower of defile A passenger and cargo train of the Denver, South Park & Pacific Railroad Railroad Pacific & Park South Denver, the of train cargo and passenger A Denver South Park & Pacific 112 threads the narrow narrow the threads 112 Pacific & Park South Denver the original dream was never fully realized. realized. fully never was dream original the railroad system wholly contained within the state, state, the within contained wholly system railroad and the DSP&P became the largest narrow gauge gauge narrow largest the became DSP&P the and Although 335 miles of track were eventually laid laid eventually were track of miles 335 Although South Park & Pacific Railway Company in 1872. 1872. in Company Railway Pacific & Park South Denver’s leading businessmen formed The Denver Denver The formed businessmen leading Denver’s would outweigh the costs, Evans and a group of of group a and Evans costs, the outweigh would the challenge and convinced that the benefits benefits the that convinced and challenge the to achieve a functional rail line. Still undaunted by by undaunted Still line. rail functional a achieve to would require tunneling through tons of solid rock rock solid of tons through tunneling require would Excessive grades and treacherous winter weather weather winter treacherous and grades Excessive wagon roads and even foot trails seemed unlikely.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Spatial Accumulation Patterns of Snow Water
    THESIS SPATIAL ACCUMULATION PATTERNS OF SNOW WATER EQUIVALENT IN THE SOUTHERN ROCKY MOUNTAINS Submitted by Benjamin C. Von Thaden Department of Ecosystem Science and Sustainability In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of M.S. Watershed Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Spring, 2016 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Steven R. Fassnacht John D. Stednick Gregory Butters Copyright by Benjamin C. Von Thaden 2016 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT SPATIAL ACCUMULATION PATTERNS OF SNOW WATER EQUIVALENT IN THE SOUTHERN ROCKY MOUNTAINS Only several point measurements may be taken within a given watershed to estimate snow water equivalent (SWE) due to cost limitations, which necessitates basin-scale estimation of SWE. Modeling often assumes consistency in the spatial distribution of SWE, which may not be correct. Identifying patterns and variability in the spatial distribution of SWE can improve snow hydrology models and result in more accurate modeling. Most previous snow distribution studies focused on small domains, less than 10 km. This study examined SWE distribution at a domain of 757 km. This study used variogram analysis for SWE data from 90 long-term SNOTEL stations to determine if a physical distance exists at which snow accumulation patterns across the southern Rocky Mountains vary abruptly. The concurrent accumulation period from SNOTEL stations were paired one-by-one until all 90 stations were compared among each other for all years on record. This comparison generated a relative accumulation slope (relative to the accumulation slope of all other 89 SNOTEL stations from the period of record) and along with physical distance between station pairs, variograms were computed using the semi-variance of the relative accumulation slopes.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Snowmelt Versus Rainfall Events in the Mountains 10.1002/2014JD022753 Steven R
    PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres RESEARCH ARTICLE Large snowmelt versus rainfall events in the mountains 10.1002/2014JD022753 Steven R. Fassnacht1,2 and Rosemary M. Records3 Key Points: 1ESS-Watershed Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA, 2Cooperative Institute for Research in the • Large daily snowmelt equals or 3 exceeds precipitation in the mountains Atmosphere, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA, Department of Geosciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA • Daily precipitation equals or exceeds rainfall in the mountains Abstract While snow is the dominant precipitation type in mountain regions, estimates of rainfall are used for design, even though snowmelt provides most of the runoff. Daily data were used to estimate the 10 and Supporting Information: • Readme 100 year, 24 h snowmelt, precipitation, and rainfall events at 90 Snow Telemetry stations across the Southern • Table S1 Rocky Mountains. Three probability distributions were compared, and the Pearson type III distribution yielded the most conservative estimates. Precipitation was on average 33% and 28% more than rainfall for Correspondence to: the 10 and 100 year events. Snowfall exceeded rainfall at most of the stations and was on average 53% and S. R. Fassnacht, [email protected] 38% more for the 10 and 100 year events. On average, snowmelt was 15% and 8.9% more than precipitation. Where snow accumulation is substantial, it is recommended that snowmelt be considered in conjunction with rainfall and precipitation frequencies to develop flood frequencies. Citation: Fassnacht, S. R., and R. M. Records (2015), Large snowmelt versus rainfall events in the mountains, J. Geophys. Res. 1. Introduction Atmos., 120, 2375–2381, doi:10.1002/ 2014JD022753.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Narrative
    Fremont Recpath Summit County Extension Design Narrative Section 1 Project Description 1 Fremont Recpath Summit County Extension Design Narrative 1.0 Introduction The Fremont Recreational Pathway (Fremont Recpath or Path) is a collaborative effort of Summit and Lake Counties, Colorado (Counties), and the Climax Molybdenum Company (Climax, and collectively the Parties), to explore a potential regional, multi- modal, separated recreational Pathway alignment connecting the pathway systems of the two Counties and passing through properties on Fremont Pass owned and mined by Climax. Through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) executed on May 15, 2014 (Appendix 1), the Counties and Climax expressed the mutual concern for the safety of cyclists and motorists sharing the roadway over Fremont Pass, and recognized the importance of the development of a separated regional recreational Pathway for multi- modal use as an important quality of life, safety enhancement, economic development, and community partnering opportunity. This Design Narrative is intended to: identify the design criteria that guided layout of Pathway alignments on the ground; identify the types of topographic, geologic, and hydrologic constraints encountered along the alignments; establish preferred and alternative routes; and to reference planning assumptions made in the field as they relate to anticipated engineering solutions that would allow for pathway construction of the Summit County Extension of the Fremont Recpath. 1.1 General Location: Fremont Recpath The conceptual alignment of the proposed Fremont Recpath is illustrated on Map 1. As depicted, the alignment would roughly parallel State Highway 91 over Fremont Pass, connecting the Mineral Belt Trail in Lake County to the Tenmile Canyon Recpath at Copper Mountain in Summit County.
    [Show full text]
  • Gunnison County Trails Master Plan
    GUNNISON COUNTY TRAILS MASTER PLAN 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover Page Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................................……................. 2 Executive Summary General Priorities ........................................................................................................................ 4 Access Concerns …………......................................................................................................... 5 Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. .........…............. 7 Chapter 1. Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 8 GCTMP Objectives ..................................................................................................................... 8 Why Trails? .................................................................................................................................. 8 Trail Benefits .............................................. ................................................................................. 8 Trail Systems ............................................................................................................................... 8 GCTMP Mission Statement ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Blue River Water Quality Management Plan 2012
    BLUE RIVER WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 WATERSHED OVERVIEW 1.1 Geography and Hydrology B - 3 1.2 Land Uses and Population Characteristics B - 4 1.3 Watershed Water Quality Management B - 5 2.0 WATERSHED WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT B - 6 2.1 Straight Creek B - 7 2.2 Snake River and Peru Creek B - 7 2.3 Upper Blue River and French Gulch B - 11 2.4 Tenmile Creek B - 14 2.5 Dillon Reservoir B - 18 2.6 Lower Blue River B - 20 2.7 Green Mountain Reservoir B - 24 2.8 Watershed Instream Flows B - 26 3.0 WATER QUALITY ISSUES B - 27 3.1 Point Source Issues B - 27 3.1.1 Municipal Discharges B - 27 3.1.2 Population Statistics and Projections B - 30 3.1.3 Industrial Discharges B - 31 3.1.4 Point Source Issues - Summary B - 31 3.2 Point Source Recommendations B - 32 3.3 Nonpoint Source Issues B - 33 3.3.1 Mining Impacts B - 33 3.3.2 Urban and Construction Activities B - 33 3.3.3 Hydrologic Modifications B - 35 3.3.3.1 Hydrologic Modifications Associated with Trans-basin Diversions B - 35 3.3.3.2 Hydrologic Modifications Associated with In-basin Diversions B - 36 3.3.4 Agricultural Activities B - 37 3.3.5 Recreational Activities B - 37 3.4 Nonpoint Source Recommendations B - 38 4.0 WATERSHED IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS B - 39 4.1 Existing Projects B - 39 4.1.1 Town of Frisco Stormwater Project B - 39 4.1.2 Town of Dillon Stormwater Project B - 39 4.1.3 Town of Breckenridge Blue River Restoration B - 39 4.1.4 Breckenridge Stormwater Quality Enhancement B - 40 4.1.5 Division of Minerals and Geology Peru Creek B - 40 4.1.6 Division
    [Show full text]
  • Leading the World in Moly Brochure
    LEADING THE WORLD IN MOLY INTRODUCTION There is a growing global demand for molybdenum, a versatile element with diverse applications in the chemical, engineering and petroleum industries. Molybdenum and its alloys are key components in chemical and metallurgical applications. Climax Molybdenum Company, a subsidiary of Freeport- McMoRan, is one of the world’s leading molybdenum producers. From our early beginnings in Colorado, Climax Molybdenum has grown into a global, diversified company with downstream operations and a proven commercial presence worldwide. Climax Mine, Colorado 1918 CLIMAX MINE BEGINS PRODUCTION On April 2, 1918, Climax ships its first concentrate totaling 21,000 pounds with a market value of $100,000. Climax is a major contributor to the allied war effort Molybdenum first discovered on Bartlett Mountain. First stakes claimed mine. during World War I. 1879 1890 1918 Climax Molybdenum 1 Our operations in North America and upgraded molybdenum chemical products. South America include both primary The Climax Stowmarket plant in the and by-product molybdenum mines. United Kingdom provides ferromolybdenum and Climax Molybdenum B.V. in the GLOBAL OPERATIONS We are also one of the leading global Netherlands produces technical molybdic producers of molybdenum with chemical oxide, ammonium dimolybdate and pure and metallurgical products manufactured molybdic oxide. at our production facilities in the United States and Europe. Our Fort Madison’s Serving customers worldwide, Climax conversion capabilities provide Climax Molybdenum’s
    [Show full text]
  • Design Narrative
    Fremont Recpath Summit County Extension Design Narrative Section 5 Alternatives 62 Fremont Recpath Summit County Extension Design Narrative 5.0 Summit County Extension: Alternatives The Summit County Extension: Design Narrative describes the action alternatives for connecting the Tenmile Canyon Recpath at Copper Mountain to the terminus of the Climax segment of the pathway at the northern boundary of the Climax property, as well as alternative routes explored in the field that were reviewed but not advanced for further study due to environmental, physical, or budgetary constraints, or reviewed but not considered to be feasible or constructible. 5.1 Alternative 1: No Action Under the No Action Alternative, no development of a separated Pathway or expansion of the roadway surface to better accommodate bicycle travel would be pursued over Fremont Pass. The Bicycle Level of Service would remain extremely low, and the local, regional, and statewide goals for improved intermodal connectivity of the Summit and Lake County Bicycle Pathway Systems would remain unsatisfied. Photo Plate 50 Existing condition Lack of shoulder width to accommodate safe shared use of the road surface 63 Fremont Recpath Summit County Extension Design Narrative 5.2 Action Alternative 2: Historic Rail Grade Alignment (Preferred Alternative) Preliminary pathway layout considerations have prioritized following an alignment that overlays the historic route of the Highline Extension of the Denver, South Park and Pacific Railroad. 5.2.1 Historic Context: DSP&P Highline Extension Map 4 Historic Rail Lines: Fremont Pass The preferred alignment for the Summit County Extension of the Fremont Recpath follows the rail bed of the historic High Line Extension of the Denver South Park and Pacific Railroad (DSP&P).
    [Show full text]