DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Report Final Report Communications Support for the Hazelnut Industry Trevor Ranford Hazelnut Growers of Australia Inc Project Number: HZ13001 HZ13001 This project has been funded by Horticulture Innovation Australia Limited with co-investment from the Hazelnut Growers of Australia Inc and funds from the Australian Government. Horticulture Innovation Australia Limited (Hort Innovation) makes no representations and expressly disclaims all warranties (to the extent permitted by law) about the accuracy, completeness, or currency of information in Communications Support for the Hazelnut Industry. Reliance on any information provided by Hort Innovation is entirely at your own risk. Hort Innovation is not responsible for, and will not be liable for, any loss, damage, claim, expense, cost (including legal costs) or other liability arising in any way (including from Hort Innovation or any other person’s negligence or otherwise) from your use or non-use of Communications Support for the Hazelnut Industry, or from reliance on information contained in the material or that Hort Innovation provides to you by any other means. ISBN 978 0 7341 3916 0 Published and distributed by: Horticulture Innovation Australia Limited Level 8, 1 Chifley Square Sydney NSW 2000 Tel: (02) 8295 2300 Fax: (02) 8295 2399 © Copyright 2016 Contents Summary....................................................................................................................................... 3 Keywords ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction................................................................................................................................... 6 Methodology.................................................................................................................................. 7 Outputs......................................................................................................................................... 8 Outcomes.................................................................................................................................... 11 Evaluation and Discussion ............................................................................................................. 19 Recommendations........................................................................................................................ 22 Scientific Refereed Publications...................................................................................................... 23 IP/Commercialisation.................................................................................................................... 24 References .................................................................................................................................. 25 Acknowledgements....................................................................................................................... 26 Appendices.................................................................................................................................. 27 2 Summary In Australia the landscape of volunteer organisation has changed over the past decade and this brings some challenges to Hazelnut Growers of Australia Inc, in its aim to best guide the industry and its growth in a positive fashion. We were finding it difficult to gather and maintain volunteers in this space where commercial realities were difficult yet vast. The Hazelnut Growers Association (HGA) is the peak body representing the interests of hazelnut growers in Australia. The industry is rapidly expanding its production as a result of increased plantings over the last five years. As a result the industry required substantial continuing development to support this expansion. As the Project Team Leader and President (2013 to 2015), I have limited experience in the Australian horticultural industry and have found the Communications Project Officer’s role to be an invaluable one in identifying and realising opportunities. It is vital that our industry stands tall amongst our peers and this role has assisted greatly in this aim by identifying and projecting opportunities, clarifying past experiences and working with the Executive to grow our industry. HGA has established itself as an important and integral member of the Australian Nut Industry and while the smallest industry within the nut sector HGA has been able to present itself as a professional and competent organisation. HGA has and continues to present itself and relevant industry issues at a wide range of government, industry and community committees, organisations and meetings. Hazelnut Growers of Australia Inc has continued the Communications Project Officer project through to December 2015 to build on the success of the first two years. Regular communication of technical and regulatory developments to a developing industry's grower base by a trusted well informed source was vital to support industry up-take, growth, development and profitability resulting in confidence and further growth. While the “Communications Support for the Hazelnut Industry” was a small project ($16,500 over eighteen months) it has been a very important one for the Australian Hazelnut Industry because it has brought some focus into the past, current and future needs and activities of the Hazelnut Growers of Australia Inc, and introduced a high level of professionalism. Over the past three and a half years the Communications Project Officer has undertaken a wide range of activities that have been most important in achieving the goals of the project and clarifying and re-prioritizing future goals. HGA is committed to continuing the programs and projects generated from this project utilising all available resources to ensure the momentum gained over the past three and a half years is not lost. HGA is already planning a range of new initiatives post December 2015 including:- a) improving the industry’s ability to manage biosecurity activities, b) development of a new Strategic plan, R,D & E investment strategies, Marketing investment strategies, and specific development activity schedules, and c) participating in the inaugural ‘Tri-Nut Conference’. As well as consolidating the recent past relationship building of sponsors, supporters and members. Further with the changes to available funding effectively removing access of HGA to Government assistance, this role has placed HGA in a position where we may continue to be the best advocates for our growers. 3 4 Keywords Hazelnuts; Communications; Technology Transfer; Communications Project Officer; Biosecurity; Grower survey; Statistics; Conference; Pests; Diseases; Chemicals. 5 Introduction Regular communication of technical and regulatory developments to a developing industry’s grower base by a trusted well informed source is vital to support industry up-take, growth, development, and profitability, resulting in confidence and further growth has been determined as an essential component of any Horticulture Industry. The Australian Hazelnut Industry is no different. The Australian hazelnut industry’s PIB, Hazelnut Growers of Australia Inc (HGA), has a membership of 80 – 100 financial members and is administered by a voluntary Board of Management. HGA is aware that an unknown number of hazelnut growers exist who are not members of HGA. The need for professional support in communications to improve member service and reach all commercial hazelnut growers was identified as a result of a strategic planning workshop in October 2011. The HGA estimates that production is currently about 70 tonnes, from a planted area of 130 Ha (including young orchards yet to come into production). The HGA predicts that by 2015 production could total 150 tonnes in-shell, from an area planted of close to 200 Ha. This development will be the result of a continued expansion in area planted to hazelnuts, and the use of new high yielding varieties identified in research conducted by the HGA. The peak industry body decided to take a leadership role and support the further development of the industry. In the recent process of developing an industry strategic plan the HGA identified a number of activities that would support continued industry growth and development. In order to complete these tasks the employment of a part time Communications Officer to support the voluntary Board of Management of HGA was determined as an essential part of the process. HGA‟s lodged an application for funds from HAL and this gained approval in November 2011. Advertisements were placed for a part time Communications Project Officer (CPO) and a skilled professional Horticultural administrator, mentor and communicator has been appointed on a part time contract. The appointee, Trevor Ranford, has an excellent track record of advancing the communications reach, technical transfer and development of small and large horticultural industries. Furthermore, Mr Ranford has broad experience of representing, mentoring and meeting the needs of several Australian tree nut industries. During the period of 2012 – 2015 Mr Ranford has continued to provide supporting communication capacity, expand, develop and implement projects initiated in year one, and provide direction and guidance to HGA Board. Over the past three and a half years HGA has been able to build recognition for and relevance to industry of HGA as a source of technical information and industry leadership through a structured
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Servicio Agrícola Y Ganadero Establece Criterios De Dirección Nacional Regionalización En Relación a Las Plagas Cuarentenarias Para El Territorio De Chile
    Versión no publicada en el Diario Oficial SERVICIO AGRÍCOLA Y GANADERO ESTABLECE CRITERIOS DE DIRECCIÓN NACIONAL REGIONALIZACIÓN EN RELACIÓN A LAS PLAGAS CUARENTENARIAS PARA EL TERRITORIO DE CHILE SANTIAGO, 20 de octubre 2003 RESOLUCIÓN N° 3080 de 2003 Versión consolidada que incluye las modificaciones posteriores establecidas en las Resoluciones N°s 1162 de 2013; 3303 de 2013 y 337 de 2014; vigentes a la fecha (29/01/2014). HOY SE RESOLVIÓ LO QUE SIGUE: N°__3080__________________/ VISTOS: Lo dispuesto en la Ley N° 18.755 Orgánica del Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero de 1989, modificada por la Ley N° 19.283 de 1994;el Decreto Ley N° 3.557 de 1980, sobre Protección Agrícola; el Decreto Ley N° 16 del 5 de Enero de 1995, del Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores; y CONSIDERANDO: 1. Que el Acuerdo de Marrakech que estableció la Organización Mundial del Comercio (OMC), y los Acuerdos Anexos, entre ellos, el “Acuerdo sobre la Aplicación de Medidas Sanitarias y Fitosanitarias” determinan la necesidad de reconocer las condiciones de regionalización derivadas de la presencia, distribución o ausencia de plagas. 2. Que Chile como miembro signatario del Acuerdo sobre la Aplicación de Medidas Sanitarias y Fitosanitarias deben asegurar que sus medidas fitosanitarias se adapten a las características fitosanitarias regionales de las zonas de origen y destino de los productos vegetales, ya se trate de todo el país o parte del país. 3. Que, para este propósito el Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero, mediante los correspondientes Análisis de Riesgo de Plagas, está facultado para establecer las Listas de Plagas Cuarentenarias que se consideran cumplen con tal condición y que las mismas constituirán parte de la reglamentación fitosanitaria que deberán cumplir los artículos reglamentados para su ingreso al país.
    [Show full text]
  • Pests of Pome and Stone Fruit and Their Predators and Parasitoids
    Pests of Pome and Stone Fruit and their Predators and Parasitoids A Pocket Guide M.B. Malipatil, D.G. Williams and L. Semeraro Published by the Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions First Published November 1996 Reprinted August 1997 Revised August 2009 Revised February 2019 © The State of Victoria, 2019 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Victorian Government, 1 Spring St, Melbourne 3000 ISBN 978-1-76090-082-3 (pdf/online/MS word) Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. While every effort has been made to ensure the currency, accuracy or completeness of the content we endeavour to keep the content relevant and up to date and reserve the right to make changes as required. The Victorian Government, authors and presenters do not accept any liability to any person for the information (or the use of the information) which is provided or referred to in the report. For more information about DJPR visit the website at www.djpr.vic.gov.au or call the Customer Service Centre on 136 186 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Things to consider when identifying insects / mites Life cycles How do you know you have
    [Show full text]
  • Fruit-Tree Borer (Maroga Melanostigma): Investigations on Its Biological Control in Prune Trees
    Fruit-tree borer (Maroga melanostigma): Investigations on its biological control in prune trees Susan Plantier Marte Masters of Science (Honours) University of Western Sydney 2007 DEDICATION In memory of Maddy and those lost along the way… ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people I would like to thank and acknowledge for the help and support they have shown me throughout this process. First and foremost are the co-operators in this trial. Without the generosity of Jeff Granger, Cheryl & Doug Heley, Mary Sticpewich and Malcolm Taylor I would not have been able to carry out my research so enjoyably. They gave of their time and their trees and I only wish they could take heart in knowing that no borers were harmed in this trial. Somehow, I think they wish it were otherwise. I would also like to thank my supervisors – Robert Spooner-Hart for his guidance in helping me think, and write, more like a research entomologist than an extension horticulturist; and especially W. Graham Thwaite for his effort and enthusiasm. If it weren’t for him, I would still be hiding from bugs and oblivious to their beauties and charms. Many thanks go to those who have financially supported this project – the Australian Prune Industry and Horticulture Australia Ltd through levies; and NSW Department of Primary Industries through their in-kind contribution to this project. My sincere thanks and appreciation to the following people and organisations. I would not have gotten over the many hurtles in this trial without them. In no particular order: • Remy van de Ven for his biometric support; • Patrick Berger and his team at Australian Produced Biologicals for providing the trial with two seasons of cultured Helicoverpa eggs; • QDPI for providing the trial with one season of cultured Helicoverpa eggs; • Craig Wilson at Ecogrow for his time, facilities and expertise; • Robert Fitzpatrick for keeping me in borer infested wood; and • Marion Eslick and Anne Mooney for their borer damage scouting expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Policy Review
    Draft policy review A categorisation of invertebrate and pathogen organisms associated with fresh table grape bunches (Vitis spp.) imported from other Australian states and territories Supporting your success Draft pest categorisation report Contributing authors Bennington JM Research Officer – Biosecurity and Regulation, Plant Biosecurity Hammond NE Research Officer – Biosecurity and Regulation, Plant Biosecurity Hooper RG Research Officer – Biosecurity and Regulation, Plant Biosecurity Jackson SL Research Officer – Biosecurity and Regulation, Plant Biosecurity Poole MC Research Officer – Biosecurity and Regulation, Plant Biosecurity Tuten SJ Senior Policy Officer – Biosecurity and Regulation, Plant Biosecurity Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, December 2014 Document citation DAFWA 2015, Draft policy review: A categorisation of invertebrate and pathogen organisms associated with fresh table grape bunches (Vitis spp.) imported from other Australian states and territories. Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, South Perth. Copyright© Western Australian Agriculture Authority, 2015 Western Australian Government materials, including website pages, documents and online graphics, audio and video are protected by copyright law. Copyright of materials created by or for the Department of Agriculture and Food resides with the Western Australian Agriculture Authority established under the Biosecurity and Agriculture Management Act 2007. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research,
    [Show full text]
  • Xylorictid Wood Moths Common Name Xylorictid Wood Moth the Majority of the 275 Named Australian Species from More Than 52 Genera Genus Within This Family Are Borers
    Xylorictid Wood Moths Common Name Xylorictid Wood Moth The majority of the 275 named Australian species from more than 52 genera Genus within this family are borers. Two of the larger Genus are Xylorycta and Cryptophasa (meaning eating in private), Family Xyorictidae Order Lepidoptera Life cycle As with all Lepidoptera this family undergoes complete metamorphosis Damage is done by the larvae that feeds at night along the margins of the wound and retreats during the day to a frass covered “tunnel”. Host Most moths in this family are oligophagous. There is a large number of species that attack an even larger number of species of trees including, amongst others, Prunus spp., Acer palmatum, Ceratapetulum spp., Hakea spp., Acacia spp. Most species bore a tunnel for habitat and feed on the phloem surrounding the tunnel. Other species bore only in the outer bark of the tree. Identifying Most commonly feeding at branch junctions the caterpillar makes a covering features by webbing wood borings and frass together. The caterpillars have legs and prolegs, which easily distinguishes them from other xylophagous larvae. The colour of the larva varies considerably but generally not decorative. Symptoms Branches that die off usually at a branch junction as the result of ringbarking of the branch caused by the feeding habits of the larvae Signs Webbed frass usually located at branch junctions particularly at included junctions or at branch junctions on trees that are stressed. Large sections of phloem missing with the limb often becoming completely girdled over time. Chemical The easiest treatment involves brushing off or otherwise removing the control webbed frass and spraying the area of the damage and the surrounding 25 – 50 mm with a garden surface spray (I have use Mortein outdoor barrier spray with good results).
    [Show full text]
  • EU Project Number 613678
    EU project number 613678 Strategies to develop effective, innovative and practical approaches to protect major European fruit crops from pests and pathogens Work package 1. Pathways of introduction of fruit pests and pathogens Deliverable 1.3. PART 7 - REPORT on Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List Partners involved: EPPO (Grousset F, Petter F, Suffert M) and JKI (Steffen K, Wilstermann A, Schrader G). This document should be cited as ‘Grousset F, Wistermann A, Steffen K, Petter F, Schrader G, Suffert M (2016) DROPSA Deliverable 1.3 Report for Oranges and Mandarins – Fruit pathway and Alert List’. An Excel file containing supporting information is available at https://upload.eppo.int/download/112o3f5b0c014 DROPSA is funded by the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration (grant agreement no. 613678). www.dropsaproject.eu [email protected] DROPSA DELIVERABLE REPORT on ORANGES AND MANDARINS – Fruit pathway and Alert List 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background on oranges and mandarins ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Data on production and trade of orange and mandarin fruit ........................................................................ 5 1.3 Characteristics of the pathway ‘orange and mandarin fruit’ .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table Grapes
    Draft policy review A categorisation of invertebrate and pathogen organisms associated with fresh table grape bunches (Vitis spp.) imported from other Australian states and territories Supporting your success Contributing authors Bennington JM Research Officer – Biosecurity and Regulation, Plant Biosecurity Hammond NE Research Officer – Biosecurity and Regulation, Plant Biosecurity Hooper RG Research Officer – Biosecurity and Regulation, Plant Biosecurity Jackson SL Research Officer – Biosecurity and Regulation, Plant Biosecurity Poole MC Research Officer – Biosecurity and Regulation, Plant Biosecurity Tuten SJ Senior Policy Officer – Biosecurity and Regulation, Plant Biosecurity Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia, December 2014 Document citation DAFWA 2014. A categorisation of invertebrate and pathogen organisms associated with fresh table grape bunches (Vitis spp.) imported from other Australian states and territories. Department of Agriculture and Food, Western Australia. 300 pp., 271 refs. Copyright © Western Australian Agriculture Authority, 2014 Western Australian Government materials, including website pages, documents and online graphics, audio and video are protected by copyright law. Copyright of materials created by or for the Department of Agriculture and Food resides with the Western Australian Agriculture Authority established under the Biosecurity and Agriculture Management Act 2007. Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the provisions
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeography and the Evolution of ARTICLE flightlessness in a Radiation of Hawaiian Moths (Xyloryctidae: Thyrocopa) Matthew J
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2011) 38, 101–111 ORIGINAL Biogeography and the evolution of ARTICLE flightlessness in a radiation of Hawaiian moths (Xyloryctidae: Thyrocopa) Matthew J. Medeiros1* and Rosemary G. Gillespie2 1Department of Integrative Biology, University ABSTRACT of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA, Aim Although the ability to fly confers benefits to most insects, some taxa have 2Department of Environmental Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, become secondarily flightless. Insect flightlessness may be more likely to evolve in USA environments such as islands and other windswept and alpine areas, but this prediction has rarely been tested while controlling for phylogenetic effects. Here we present a phylogeny for the endemic Hawaiian Lepidoptera genus Thyrocopa, which has two flightless species that occur in alpine areas on Maui and Hawaii islands, in order to determine whether the flightless species are sister to each other or represent separate losses of flight. We also explore divergence times and biogeographic patterns of inter-island colonization in Thyrocopa, and present the first Hawaiian study to sample a genus from nine islands. Location The Hawaiian Islands. Methods The phylogeny is composed of 70 individuals (including 23 Thyrocopa species and 7 outgroup species) sequenced for portions of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I, elongation factor 1a and wingless genes, for a total of 1964 base pairs, and was estimated using both parsimony (paup*) and Bayesian inference (MrBayes). Divergence times were estimated using the beast software package. Results Our results indicate that two independent invasions of alpine habitats with concomitant loss of flight have occurred in Thyrocopa. Based on current taxon sampling, Thyrocopa colonized the Hawaiian Islands slightly before the formation of Kauai.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Tools for Predicting Responses of Viticultural Pests and Their Natural Enemies Under Climate Change: Modelling, Management and Extension
    Developing tools for predicting responses of viticultural pests and their natural enemies under climate change: modelling, management and extension Mask created from the generalised climate zones to limit models to relevant geographical areas- the areas which all species could have accessed through dispersal and human-mediated transport Principal Investigator: Ary Hoffmann Chief Investigator : Linda Thomson Research Organisation: University of Melbourne Date: April 2013 1 Developing tools for predicting responses of viticultural pests and their natural enemies under climate change: modelling, management and extension Linda J. Thomson and Ary A. Hoffmann Project Number: UM 0901 Period Report Covers: 1/07/09 – 30/9/12 Author Details: Linda Thomson and Ary Hoffmann University of Melbourne Parkville 3010 Phone: 03 90353128 Fax: 03 83442279 Mobile: 0408 376 300 Email: [email protected] [email protected] Date report completed: April 2013 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Abstract: ...................................................................................................................... 4 2 Executive summary: ................................................................................................... 4 3. Background: ................................................................................................................ 6 4. Project aims and performance targets: ..................................................................... 7 5. Method: .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reviews of High Priority Species for Woody Biomass Crops in Lower Rainfall Australia Southern Australia FLORASEARCH 3B
    Reviews of High Priority Species for Woody Biomass Crops in Lower Rainfall Australia Southern Australia FLORASEARCH 3B Reviews of High Priority Species for Woody Biomass Crops in Lower Rainfall Southern Australia FloraSearch 3b by Trevor J. Hobbs, John Bartle and Michael Bennell (eds) August 2009 RIRDC Publication No 09/044 RIRDC Project No UWA-98A i © 2009 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 1 74151 847 4 ISSN 1440-6845 Reviews of High Priority Species for Woody Biomass Crops in Lower Rainfall Southern Australia - FloraSearch 3b Publication No. 09/044 Project No. UWA-98A The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable regions. You must not rely on any information contained in this publication without taking specialist advice relevant to your particular circumstances. While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication to ensure that information is true and correct, the Commonwealth of Australia gives no assurance as to the accuracy of any information in this publication. The Commonwealth of Australia, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), the authors or contributors expressly disclaim, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any act or omission, or for any consequences of any such act or omission, made in reliance on the contents of this publication, whether or not caused by any negligence on the part of the Commonwealth of Australia, RIRDC, the authors or contributors. The Commonwealth of Australia does not necessarily endorse the views in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOSECURITY NEW ZEALAND STANDARD 155.02.06 Importation
    BIOSECURITY NEW ZEALAND STANDARD 155.02.06 Importation of Nursery Stock Issued as an import health standard pursuant to section 22 of the Biosecurity Act 1993 Biosecurity New Zealand Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry PO Box 2526 Wellington New Zealand CONTENTS Endorsement Review Amendment Record 1. Introduction 1.1 Official Contact Point 1.2 Scope 1.3 References 1.4 Definitions and Abbreviations 1.5 General 1.6 Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species 2. Import Specification and Entry Conditions 2.1 Import Specification 2.2 Entry Conditions 2.2.1 Basic Conditions 2.2.1.1 Types of Nursery Stock that may be Imported 2.2.1.2 Import Permit 2.2.1.3 Labelling 2.2.1.4 Cleanliness 2.2.1.5 Phytosanitary Certificate 2.2.1.6 Pesticide treatments for whole plants and cuttings 2.2.1.7 Pesticide treatments for dormant bulbs 2.2.1.8 Measures for Helicobasidium mompa 2.2.1.9 Measures for Phymatotrichopsis omnivora 2.2.1.10 Post-Entry Quarantine (PEQ) 2.2.2 Entry Conditions for Tissue Culture 2.2.2.1 Labelling 2.2.2.2 Cleanliness 2.2.2.3 Phytosanitary Certificate 2.2.2.4 Inspection on Arrival 2.2.3 Importation of Pollen 2.2.4 Importation of New Organisms 2.3 Compliance Procedures 2.3.1 Validation of Overseas Measures 2.3.2 Treatment and Testing of the Consignment 2.4 New Zealand Nursery Stock Returning from Overseas 3. Schedule of Special Entry Conditions 3.1 Special Entry Conditions 3.2 Accreditation of Offshore Plant Quarantine Facilities 3.3 Amendments to the Plants Biosecurity Index Biosecurity New Zealand Standard 155.02.06: Importation of Nursery Stock.
    [Show full text]
  • (Vitis Vinifera L.) 생과실 개별 병해충 위험평가
    호주산 포도(Vitis vinifera L.) 생과실 개별 병해충 위험평가 2011. 7. 농림수산검역검사본부 식물검역부 위험관리과 요약 추진경과 ❍ ‘02. 6.호주측이 자국산 포도 ( Vitis vinifera L.) 생과실 수입허용 요청 및 병해충 목록 제시 -병해충 237 종 ( 병 103, 해충 134) 의 목록 제공 ❍ ‘09.10.호주측이자국산포도 ( Vitis vinifera L.) 재배현황및 수확후 관리등 자료제시 ❍ ‘10. 8.호주산 포도 ( Vitis vinifera L.) 생과실 수입위험분석 착수 -호주측 제공 해충목록 19 종에 대한 정확한 종명 추가 요구 ❍ ‘10. 10호주산 포도 ( Vitis vinifera L.) 생과실 예비평가 ❍ ‘11. 5. 11 호주측이 호주산 포도 병해충 관련 추가자료 제시 - 예비평가에 대한 관련 자료 회신 개별평가결과 ❍ 호주포도 생과실에 발생하는 병해충의 예비위험평가를 재검토한 결과 15종 ( 병 3 종 , 해충 12 종 ) 을 개별평가 대상으로 선정 ❍ 이중 과실파리류3, 종 잎말이 나방과 1, 종 병원체 1 종을 특별위험관리 병해충으로 평가(10나머지 종은 일반위험관리병해충으로 평가 ) ❍ 특별위험관리병해충에 대해서는 검토대상국가에 위험관리방안 제시를 요구 하여 적절한 관리방안 마련 예정 - 저온처리방법 등의 물리 화학적인 소독처리 및System approach 가 요구됨 이해당사자 및 전문가 의견 수렴 ❍ 우리부 홈페이지 게시 또는 자문위원,, 학회 연구기관 ( 농진청 , 각도 농업기술원), 과수협회 등 관련기관 의견수렴 금후추진계획 ❍ 이해 당사자 및 전문가 의견을 반영한 확정된 평가결과를 해당과에 통보 하고 상대국에 적절한 위험관리방안 제시 요구 ❍ 상대국이 제시한 관리방안의 적용 및 세부처리기준 검토 - 1 - 요 약 1 I. 추진 경과 1 II. 개별병해충 위험평가 2 1. 호주산 포도 병해충 categorization 2 2. 개별 병원체 위험평가 7 3. 개별 해충 위험평가 8 4.개별병해충 위험평가 결과 종합 9 III .금후 추진 계획 10 <첨 부 > 1. 개별병원체 위험평가서 2 개별해충 위험평가서 3. 호주산 포도 생과실 병해충 목록 4. 포도의 식물학적 특징 및 산업현황 5. 수입허용 요청 품목의 병해충 위험평가 방법 개요 - 1 - ⅠⅠ.
    [Show full text]