Nature of History MASTERARBEIT

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nature of History MASTERARBEIT History of Nature – Nature of History Notions of Time and Space in Eighteenth-Century Historiography and Natural History MASTERARBEIT Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Master of Arts (MA) an der Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz vorgelegt von Florian MEIXNER, BA am Institut für Geschichte Begutachter: Univ.-Prof. Dr. phil. Simone De Angelis Graz, 2015 EIDESSTATTLICHE ERKLÄRUNG Ich versichere, dass ich die Masterarbeit selbstständig verfasst, andere als die angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmittel nicht benutzt und mich auch sonst keiner unerlaubten Hilfe bedient habe. Graz, am 17.07.2015 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 1. The End of the Scale ....................................................................................................... 6 1.1. A Problem Arising ......................................................................................................... 6 1.2. The scala naturae in Eighteenth-Century Natural History ............................................ 7 1.2.1. Nature in One Dimension ...................................................................................... 7 1.2.2. The Problem of Species – Linnaeus, Buffon and Bonnet ...................................... 9 1.2.3. Nature without Change ........................................................................................ 12 1.2.4. Preformationism vs. Epigenesis ........................................................................... 14 1.3. “Cette chaine n’existe pas” – Emerging Criticism on the Chain ................................. 17 1.3.1. Missing Links....................................................................................................... 17 1.3.2. Leibniz, his Curve and the Problem of Infinity ................................................... 19 1.4. A Net to Save the Scale – ‘Multidimensionalizing’ the scala naturae ........................ 21 1.4.1. Johann Hermann and his Tabula Affinitatum Animalium (1783) ........................ 21 1.4.2. From the Scale to the Net – Entering the Second Dimension.............................. 25 1.4.3. Affinities as Ordering Principle ........................................................................... 31 1.4.4. Spatial Limits of the Two-Dimensional Network ................................................ 32 1.5. The Comparative Method in Natural History .............................................................. 35 2. A Matter of Time .......................................................................................................... 38 2.1. Jean-Baptiste Lamarck – A New Approach ................................................................. 38 2.1.1. Back to the Scale .................................................................................................. 38 2.1.2. A Theory of Natural Change ................................................................................ 43 2.2. Ideas of Change in Eighteenth-Century Thought......................................................... 47 2.2.1. The Count and the New World – Buffon’s Concept of Degeneration ................. 47 2.2.2. Only Matter Matters – The Materialists and Change ........................................... 50 2.2.3. Past and Future States – Charles Bonnet’s Palingénésie ..................................... 53 2.2.4. The ‘Other’ Leibniz ............................................................................................. 57 2.2.5. A Power of Change – Blumenbach and his Bildungstrieb .................................. 59 2.3. A Question of Time ...................................................................................................... 62 2.3.1. Back to Lamarck .................................................................................................. 62 2.3.2. Change without Time? ......................................................................................... 63 2.3.2.1. Buffon Again ............................................................................................... 63 2.3.2.2. Bonnet and Time .......................................................................................... 66 2.3.3. Lamarck’s Escalator – A New Dimension........................................................... 66 2.4. Interim Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 68 3. Excursus: Earth in Time and Nature in Space – Eberhard August von Zimmermann’s Geographische Geschichte der Menschheit ...................................... 69 4. Inventing History – Historical Thought in the Eighteenth Century ........................ 75 4.1. Comments on Eighteenth-Century Historiography ...................................................... 75 4.2. Historia – Grasping an Early Modern Concept ........................................................... 76 4.3. Seperating Histories ..................................................................................................... 78 4.4. Dimensions of the Past – The ‘Multidimensionalization’ of History .......................... 81 4.4.1. Bossuet and the Linearity of History ................................................................... 81 4.4.2. Synchronicity and Geographical Space ............................................................... 83 4.4.2.1. Gatterer’s Nexus rerum universalis ............................................................. 83 4.4.2.2. History and Space ........................................................................................ 86 4.4.2.3. History Outside Europe................................................................................ 87 4.4.3. Expanding Time – Past, Future and Progress within ........................................... 89 4.4.4. Pushing Dimensional Boundaries – Cultures across Time and Space ................. 92 4.5. ‘Anthropology’ and the ‘History of Mankind’ – Reconnecting History and Nature ... 94 4.5.1. The Rise of Anthropological Thought ................................................................. 94 4.5.2. Man as the Link – the ‘History of Mankind’ ..................................................... 100 4.5.3. Remarks on Herder and Kant ............................................................................. 105 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 108 Bibliography ......................................................................................................................... 112 Primary Sources ................................................................................................................ 112 Secondary Literature ......................................................................................................... 116 List of Figures ....................................................................................................................... 120 Introduction Within the broader context of the history of the life sciences, the late eighteenth century is perceived as a period of fundamental changes in the conceptualization of nature as a system. Over the last decades, the transition from the static Early Modern notion of the natural world towards nineteenth-century theories of natural change – and mutability in particular – has been addressed by many historians of science. It is, above all, Arthur O. Lovejoy who has provided the term ‘temporalization’ in order to describe the processes concerning the natural world and the prevalent concept of the scale of beings in the second half of the eighteenth century. Within a specific historiographical tradition – following Michel Foucault, Reinhard Koselleck and others –, eminent historians like Wolf Lepenies1 used terms like ‘temporalization’, ‘processualization’ or ‘acceleration’ to describe rather than really explain the apparent changes within the realm of natural history. By introducing or readopting these terms, historians of science – or of ‘biology’, as we would call it today – tried to summarize the general shifts that took place in the second half of the eighteenth century and which would ultimately lead towards evolutionary thought, paving the way for Charles Darwin and his theory of natural selection. The goal was, or so it seems, to discover the roots of Darwin’s epochal theory in the preceding centuries and to describe the transitions that made the emergence of something like the Origins of Species possible. For quite a long time, the natural sciences of the eighteenth century were actually rather – even if not explicitly –seen in the aftermath of the Scientific Revolution of the seventeenth century and as the prelude to the rise of the sciences in the nineteenth century. In the examination of the history of the life sciences, it becomes clear that the innovations and insights of the eighteenth century were overshadowed by what came afterwards. Thus, it is not surprising that, in many cases, the decades of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries were merely seen as the “time before Darwin” and, equally, scientific achievements and transitions of that period simply classified as “pre-Darwinian”2. This approach towards eighteenth-century natural history and its debates about classifications, mutability and progress inevitably led to some kind of distorted perspective and created the impression of historical teleology. As a 1 Cf. LEPENIES, Wolf:
Recommended publications
  • Archivum Historicum Societatis Iesu Table of Contents
    VOL. LXXIX FASC. 158 JULY-DECEMBER 2010 ARCHIVUM HISTORICUM SOCIETATIS IESU Paul Oberholzer, S.J. Editor Advisory Editors Sibylle Appuhn-Radtke (Munich) Julius Oswald S.J. (Munich) Pau! Begheyn S.J. (Amsterdam) Antonella Romano (Florence) Robert L. Bireley SJ. (Chicago) Flavio Rurale (Udine) Louis Boisset SJ. (Rome) Lydia Salviucci Insolera (Rome) Francesco Cesareo (Worcester, Ma.) Klaus Schatz SJ. (Frankfurt/M) Rita Haub (Munich) Nicolas Standaert SJ. (Leuven) Jeffrey Klaiber SJ. (Lima) Antoni J. Oçerler SJ. (Oxford) Mark A Lewis SJ. (New Orleans) Agustin Udias SJ. (Madrid) Barbara Mahlmann-Bauer (Bern) TABLE OF CONTENTS Sif?yl!e Appuhn-Radtke, Ordensapologetik als Movens positivistischer Erkenntnis. Joseph Braun SJ. und die Barockforschung 299 Matthieu Bernhardt, Construction et enjeux du savoir ethnographique sur la Chine dans l'oeuvre de Matteo Ricci SJ. 321 Heinz Sprof~ Die Begriindung historischer Bildung aus dem Geist des Christlichen Humanismus der Societas Iesu 345 Cristiana Bigari, Andrea Pozzo S.J. e la sua eredità artistica. Antonio Colli da discepolo a collaboratore 381 Lydia Safviucci, Richard Biise~ Mostra su Andrea Pozzo SJ., pittore e architetto 407 Elisabetta Corsi, ''Ai crinali della storia". Matteo Ricci S.J. fra Roma e Pechino 414 Emanuele Colombo, Jesuits, Jews and Moslems 419 Pau/ Beghryn SJ., Bibliography 427 Book Reviews 549 Jesuit Historiographical Notes 591 Scientific activity of the members of IHSI 603 Index 606 BIBLIOGRAPHY ON THE HISTORY OF THE SOCIETY OF JESUS 2010 Paul Begheyn, S.J. I am grateful to the
    [Show full text]
  • Parte Seconda Bibliotheca Collinsiana, Seu Catalogus Librorum Antonji Collins Armigeri Ordine Alphabetico Digestus
    Parte seconda Bibliotheca Collinsiana, seu Catalogus Librorum Antonji Collins Armigeri ordine alphabetico digestus Avvertenza La biblioteca non è solo il luogo della tua memoria, dove conservi quel che hai letto, ma il luogo della memoria universale, dove un giorno, nel momento fata- le, potrai trovare quello che altri hanno letto prima di te. Umberto Eco, La memoria vegetale e altri scritti di bibliografia, Milano, Rovello, 2006 Si propone qui un’edizione del catalogo manoscritto della collezione libra- ria di Anthony Collins,1 la cui prima compilazione egli completò nel 1720.2 Nei nove anni successivi tuttavia Collins ampliò enormemente la sua biblioteca, sin quasi a raddoppiarne il numero delle opere. Annotò i nuovi titoli sulle pagine pari del suo catalogo che aveva accortamente riservato a successive integrazio- ni. Dispose le nuove inserzioni in corrispondenza degli autori già schedati, attento a preservare il più possibile l’ordine alfabetico. Questo tuttavia è talora impreciso e discontinuo.3 Le inesattezze, che ricorrono più frequentemente fra i titoli di inclusione più tarda, devono imputarsi alla difficoltà crescente di annotare nel giusto ordine le ingenti e continue acquisizioni. Sono altresì rico- noscibili abrasioni e cancellature ed in alcuni casi, forse per esigenze di spazio, oppure per sostituire i titoli espunti, i lemmi della prima stesura sono frammez- zati da titoli pubblicati in date successive al 1720.4 In appendice al catalogo, due liste confuse di titoli, per la più parte anonimi, si svolgono l’una nelle pagi- ne dispari e l’altra in quelle pari del volume.5 Agli anonimi seguono sparsi altri 1 Sono molto grato a Francesca Gallori e Barbara Maria Graf per aver contribuito alla revi- sione della mia trascrizione con dedizione e generosità.
    [Show full text]
  • Flannery Kevin L., S.J
    17_Flannery OK(Gabri)F.qxd:1.Prima Parte 22-08-2007 10:23 Pagina 64 64 YEARBOOK 2004 Flannery Kevin L., S.J. Date and place of birth: 12 August 1950, Cleveland, Ohio, USA Priestly Ordination: 6 June 1987; final vows in the Society of Jesus, 6 June 1999 Appointment to the Academy: 21 February 2004 Scientific discipline: The history of ancient philosophy, ethics Titles: Professor of Philosophy (since 1992); Consultor of the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (since 2002) Flannery Academic background Bachelor of Arts (B.A.), English Literature, Ohio State University (Columbus, Ohio), 1972; Master of Arts (M.A.), Anglo-Irish Studies, University College Dublin (Dublin, Ireland), 1974; Master of Arts (M.A.), Philosophy, Politics and Economics (specialization in general philoso- phy and political philosophy), University of Oxford, 1983; Master of Divinity (M.Div.), Weston School of Theology (Cambridge, Massachusetts), 1987; License in Sacred Theology (S.T.L.), Patristics, Weston School of Theology (Cambridge, Massachusetts), 1989; Doctor of Philosophy (D.Phil.), dissertation: ‘The logic of Alexander of Aphrodisias’, University of Oxford, 1992. Academic positions Professor of the History of Ancient Philosophy at the Pontifical Gregorian University, September 1992 until the present; Dean of the Faculty of Philosophy at the Pontifical Gregorian University, September 1999 to June 2005; Mary Ann Remick Senior Visiting Fellow at the University of Notre Dame Center for Ethics and Culture, 2006-2007; Visiting Scholar, Centre for Philosophical Psychology, Blackfriars, Oxford, Trinity Term, 2007. Summary of scientific research The ethics of Aristotle, with special emphasis on action theory; ancient logic; the ethics of Thomas Aquinas.
    [Show full text]
  • Z Dziejów Dydaktyki Logiki W Szkołach Komisji Edukacji Narodowej: Claude Buffier Sj
    ROCZNIKI FILOZOFICZNE Tom LVI, numer 2 – 2008 KS. STANISŁAW JANECZEK * Z DZIEJÓW DYDAKTYKI LOGIKI W SZKOŁACH KOMISJI EDUKACJI NARODOWEJ: CLAUDE BUFFIER SJ W najlepszej dotąd syntezie dokonań Komisji Edukacji Narodowej (KEN) za jeden z podstawowych wyróżników specyfiki dydaktyki tej instytucji oświatowej uznano – obok wpływu fizjokraty Françoisa de Quesnaya w ety- ce – dominację filozofii Étienne’a Bennot de Condillaca, w szczególności w zakresie preferencji jego metody analitycznej1. Choć Komisja zamówiła u niego podręcznik logiki2, to przecież, mimo pochwał, jakie otrzymał w To- warzystwie do Ksiąg Elementarnych, nie został on wydany w języku pol- skim, chociaż w okresie funkcjonowania Komisji dokonano przynajmniej dwóch jego przekładów3. Dzieło Condillaca nie było bowiem typowym pod- ręcznikiem logiki, ale raczej traktatem epistemologicznym, obejmującym w pierwszym rzędzie psychologię i teorię poznania, a także elementy Ks. dr hab. STANISŁAW JANECZEK, prof. KUL – Katedra Historii Filozofii w Polsce na Wydziale Filozofii Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego Jana Pawła II; adres do korespon- dencji: Al. Racławickie 14, 20-950 Lublin; e-mail: [email protected] 1 A. Jobert, La Commision d’Education Nationale en Pologne (1773-1794), Paris 1941; cyt. według polskiego wydania: Komisja Edukacji Narodowej w Polsce (1773-1794). Jej dzieło wychowania obywatelskiego, przeł. M. Chamcówna, Wrocław 1979, s. 29, 139-142. 2 É. Condillac, La Logique ou les premiers développements de l’art de penser, Paris 1780; toż w wydaniu : Œuvres philosophiques de Condillac, t. 2, red. G. Le Roy, Paris 1948, s. 269- 416; polski przekład: Logika czyli pierwsze zasady sztuki myślenia, dzieło elementarne... na żądanie bywszej Komisji Edukacyjnej Narodowej dla szkół publicznych napisane i od niej aprobowane, a teraz z przydatkiem niektórych objaśnień i przypisów przez Jana Znoskę z fran- cuskiego na polski język przełożone, Wilno 1802, 18193; toż w wydaniu współczesnym: red.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins of Genetic Determinism in Medieval Creationism By
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The University of North Carolina at Greensboro Origins of Genetic Determinism in Medieval Creationism By: Douglas Wahlsten Wahlsten, D. (1998). Origins of genetic determinism in medieval creationism. Race, Gender & Class, 5: 90-107 Made available courtesy of The University of New Orleans, Sociology Department: http://soci.uno.edu/ ***Reprinted with permission. No further reproduction is authorized without written permission from The University of New Orleans, Sociology Department. This version of the document is not the version of record. Figures and/or pictures may be missing from this format of the document.*** Abstract: The discovery of statistical laws of heredity by Gregor Mendel was an important advance in biological science. However, Mendel's opinion that the entire character was transmitted was not derived from his data and instead reflected prior beliefs outside the domain of science. It is argued here that Mendel, a monk and later abbot of an Augustine monastery, was influenced by St. Augustine's theory of divine creation of the rationes seminales which specified the form for all future beings in great detail. Furthermore, the continued adherence to genetic determinism among contemporary scientists is largely, despite strong evidence supporting a developmental systems or dialectical view of heredity and development. Keywords: St. Augustine, Mendel, Bateson, heredity, epigenesis, dialectics, reductionism Article: On the occasion of the centenary of Mendel's famous paper on hybrid crosses of garden peas, Oliver (1967) distinguished between the forefathers and modern practitioners of genetics: "Early Mendelists supposed that there was regularly a one-to-one relationship between genetic factors and their associated characters.
    [Show full text]
  • M.Sc. Microbiology (2019 ONWARDS)
    PONDICHERRY UNIVERSITY PUDUCHERRY 605 014 CURRICULUM AND SYLLABUS of M.Sc. Microbiology (2019 ONWARDS) Department of Microbiology School of Life Sciences About the course The Department of Microbiology is committed to excellence in education, research and extension. This Department is being strengthened with various research units and periodical update / modernization of the curricula. The Department of Microbiology at the Pondicherry University, School of Life Sciences, brings together a variety of researchers as faculty of this programme who are specialized in their domains and united by the common goal of understanding the “Microbes”. Microbes are playing important role in the bioprocess of all living things and maintain homeostasis of the universe. Without microbes, one cannot imagine such a biologically balanced and diverse universe; rather our earth would have placed as a barren planet. As the microbial activities are so diverse, the microbiology programme is a multidisciplinary subject, which will have the roots of life science, environmental science, and engineering. Traditional microbiology is considered to be an important area of study in biology since it has enormous potential and vast scope in fermentation, bioremediation and biomedical technology. But the recent developments from human microbiome project, metagenomics and microbial genome projects has expanded its scope and potential in the next generation drug design, molecular pathogenesis, phylogeography, production of smart biomolecules, etc. Modern Microbiology has expanded its roots in genome technology, nanobiotechnology, green energy (biofuel) technology, bioelectronics etc. Considering recent innovations and rapid growth of microbiological approaches and applications in human and environmental sustainability, the M.Sc. Microbiology curricula is designed to enlighten the students in basics of Microbiology to recent developments.
    [Show full text]
  • Malpighi, Swammerdam and the Colourful Silkworm: Replication and Visual Representation in Early Modern Science
    Annals of Science, 59 (2002), 111–147 Malpighi, Swammerdam and the Colourful Silkworm: Replication and Visual Representation in Early Modern Science Matthew Cobb Laboratoire d’Ecologie, CNRS UMR 7625, Universite´ Paris 6, 7 Quai St Bernard, 75005 Paris, France. Email: [email protected] Received 26 October 2000. Revised paper accepted 28 February 2001 Summary In 1669, Malpighi published the rst systematic dissection of an insect. The manuscript of this work contains a striking water-colour of the silkworm, which is described here for the rst time. On repeating Malpighi’s pioneering investi- gation, Swammerdam found what he thought were a number of errors, but was hampered by Malpighi’s failure to explain his techniques. This may explain Swammerdam’s subsequent description of his methods. In 1675, as he was about to abandon his scienti c researches for a life of religious contemplation, Swammerdam destroyed his manuscript on the silkworm, but not before sending the drawings to Malpighi. These gures, with their rich and unique use of colour, are studied here for the rst time. The role played by Henry Oldenburg, secretary of the Royal Society, in encouraging contact between the two men is emphasized and the way this exchange reveals the development of some key features of modern science — replication and modern scienti c illustration — is discussed. Contents 1. Introduction . 111 2. Malpighi and the silkworm . 112 3. The silkworm reveals its colours . 119 4. Swammerdam and the silkworm . 121 5. Swammerdam replicates Malpighi’s work . 124 6. Swammerdam publicly criticizes Malpighi . 126 7. Oldenburg tries to play the middle-man .
    [Show full text]
  • Challenging Current Conceptions of Eighteenth-Century French Educational Thought Tal Gilead*
    London Review of Education Vol. 7, No. 2, July 2009, 101–112 On pliability and progress: challenging current conceptions of eighteenth-century French educational thought Tal Gilead* Hebrew University, Israel TaylorCLRE_A_399209.sgm10.1080/14748460902990377London1474-8460Original200972000000JulyDrtgilea65@mscc.huji.ac.il TalGilead and& ReviewArticle Francis (print)/1474-8479Francis 2009 of Education (online)Examining the educational writings of three of the eighteenth-century’s most innovative thinkers, the Abbé de Saint-Pierre, Morelly and Helvétius, this article challenges the currently accepted view that it was a belief in human pliability which gave rise to the contemporary groundbreaking faith in the power of education to improve society. The article delineates an intellectual process that culminated in the stance that man’s innate behavioural tendencies are unalterable. It argues that, at least prior to Rousseau, the eighteenth-century faith in the power of education to improve society rested on a conviction that it is possible to beneficially direct man’s fixed behavioural tendencies. Keywords: pliability; progress; eighteenth century; education; France; philosophy Introduction The rise of the belief in the power of education to bring about the progress of society is closely associated with the work of eighteenth-century French educational thinkers. Identifying progress with the increase and spread of happiness in society, these thinkers famously argued that education can greatly contribute to it by perfecting the existing modes of conduct. Histo- rians and those concerned with the history of educational philosophy have traditionally tied the eighteenth-century emergence of the above belief to two intellectual developments: the declining faith in the doctrine of original sin, and the implementation of scientifically inspired methods of philosophical inquiry for the study of the mind which led to the embracement of a sensualist psychology.
    [Show full text]
  • Buffier, Claude Dictionnaire Des Anti-Lumières Et Des Antiphilosophes (France, 1715-1815)
    MANUSCRIT CORRIGÉ, avant publication. La version finale est publiée ici : Bernier, M. A. (2017). Buffier, Claude Dictionnaire des anti-Lumières et des antiphilosophes (France, 1715-1815). D. Masseau. Paris, Honoré Champion: 265-270. BUFFIER, Claude Né en Pologne de parents français, puis formé en France, Claude Buffier (1661-1737) est reçu au noviciat de la Compagnie de Jésus en 1679. Alors qu’il est professeur de théologie au collège de Rouen, il publie des Difficultés proposées à monseigneur l’archevêque de Rouen (1696), brochure où il s’en prend aux thèses rigoristes que favorisait le prélat et qui lui semblaient « plus propres à faire réputation au casuiste, dans un temps où tout ce qui s’appelle morale sévère est à la mode, qu’à former de justes décisions » (Robillard d’Avrigny : 1739, t. 4, p. 72). Au seuil d’une œuvre immense comptant une quarantaine d’ouvrages, ces Difficultés témoignent d’une attitude intellectuelle complexe, comportant au moins deux dimensions fondamentales qui, non sans tension, resteront chez lui étroitement associées. Il s’y exprime d’abord une fidélité à la tradition jésuite*, dont le probabilisme lui inspire le refus non seulement du rigorisme, mais aussi d’une rigidité dogmatique à laquelle il oppose une pensée du relatif, attentive à montrer que le vrai est souvent « impossible à démêler entre deux opinions probables » (Buffier : 1696, p. 17). Il y a ensuite l’ambition d’accommoder cette tradition à la modernité et, notamment, au langage des Lumières, comme l’observe à la fin du XVIIIe siècle Destutt de Tracy, qui écrit dans sa Logique : « Il était jésuite et, comme tel, très porté à combattre les idées de Descartes*, que MM.
    [Show full text]
  • Heythrop, Copleston, and the Jesuit Contribution to Philosophy 1
    1 Heythrop, Copleston, and the Jesuit Contribution to Philosophy 1 JOHN HALDANE Abstract There has been public outcry from philosophers and others at the prospect of the closure of Heythrop College, University of London; yet the nature and history of Heythrop remain little known. It is apt and timely, therefore, as its likely dissolution approaches, to provide a brief account of its origins and development up to and including the period of its entry into London University under the leadership of the most famous modern historian of philosophy Frederick Copleston. Following on from this the idea of a distinctive Jesuit intellectual tradition, and more specifically of the Jesuit contribution to philosophy is explored. If we once make the transition to metaphysical reflection (and nobody can compel us to do this), the immanent direction of the mind or reason to the One asserts itself. … Transcendence, in the active sense of transcending, belongs to man as much as does being in the world. And in my opinion metaphysics can be looked on as man’s appropriation in reflection of his own orientation to the transcendent Absolute. Frederick Copleston ‘Man, Transcendence and the Absence of God’ 2 1 The present essay derives from a lecture given at Senate House London as part of the celebration of Heythrop’s quartocentenary. I am grateful to the then Principal, Michael Holman S.J. for the invitation to contribute to that occasion. I received useful suggestions and comments from Kevin Flannery S.J., Joseph Godfrey S.J. and Patrick Riordan S.J. 2 See Copleston, Philosophers and Philosophies (London: Search Press, 1976) 62.
    [Show full text]
  • The Machine Conception of the Organism in Development And&Nbsp
    Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 48 (2014) 162e174 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/shpsc The machine conception of the organism in development and evolution: A critical analysis Daniel J. Nicholson Centre for the Study of Life Sciences (Egenis), University of Exeter, Byrne House, St. German’s Road, Exeter, Devon, EX4 4PJ, UK article info abstract Article history: This article critically examines one of the most prevalent metaphors in contemporary biology, namely Available online 12 September 2014 the machine conception of the organism (MCO). Although the fundamental differences between or- ganisms and machines make the MCO an inadequate metaphor for conceptualizing living systems, many Keywords: biologists and philosophers continue to draw upon the MCO or tacitly accept it as the standard model of Organism the organism. The analysis presented here focuses on the specific difficulties that arise when the MCO is Machine invoked in the contexts of development and evolution. In developmental biology the MCO underlies a Metaphor logically incoherent model of ontogeny, the genetic program, which serves to legitimate three prob- Genetic program Design lematic theses about development: genetic animism, neo-preformationism, and developmental Engineering computability. In evolutionary biology the MCO is responsible for grounding unwarranted theoretical appeals to the concept of design as well as to the interpretation of natural selection as an engineer, which promote a distorted understanding of the process and products of evolutionary change. Overall, it is argued that, despite its heuristic value, the MCO today is impeding rather than enabling further progress in our comprehension of living systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Msc-Mb-Syll-201718.Pdf
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Department of Microbiology CURRICULUM AND SYLLABI FOR MSc MICROBIOLOGY PROGRAM The Department of Microbiology, Central University of Tamil Nadu offers a two-year full-time MSc Degree Program in Microbiology. Purpose: To impart knowledge and training across the different fields in Microbiology to be able to equip students for academics/industry. Eligibility: Bachelor’s degree in Microbiology, Applied Microbiology, Human Genetics, Nutrition and Dietetics, Botany, Zoology, Biochemistry, Biotechnology, Life Sciences, Dairy Sciences, Agriculture and Horticulture, Home Science, Veterinary Sciences, Fisheries Sciences, Public Health, and Allied Health Sciences from a recognized university or equivalent. Candidates should have secured a minimum of 60% marks or 6.5 CGPA (on a 10-point scale) in the qualifying degree examination for General Category, 55% marks or 6.0 CGPA (on a 10-point scale) for OBC (non-creamy layer) and 50% aggregate marks or 5.5 CGPA (on a 10-point scale) for SC/ST/PWD candidates. Credits: The program consists of courses with a total of 72 credits. Core Course (CC): 60 credits Elective Course (EC): 12 credits Number of Semesters, Course Distribution: The program comprises 4 semesters; each semester has courses equivalent of 20 credits. Project Work & Dissertation: Compulsory, with 6 credits in Semester IV to impart research training. MSc Microbiology: Semester 1 COURSE TYPE NUMBER OF SL. NO. COURSE NAME CODE OF COURSE CREDITS I Semester: Theory 1 General Microbiology CMB101 CC 3 2 Cell & Molecular Biology CMB102 CC 3 3 Microbial Biochemistry CMB103 CC 3 4 Immunobiology CMB104 CC 3 5 Microbial Genetics CMB105 CC 3 6 Microbial Physiology CMB106 CC 3 I Semester: Practicals 1 Practical Microbiology I PMB101 CC 2 2 Practical Microbiology II PMB102 CC 2 MSc Microbiology: Semester 2 COURSE TYPE NUMBER OF SL.
    [Show full text]