DOCSLIB.ORG

{PDF} Doctoring the Mind: Why Psychiatric Treatments Fail Ebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
{PDF} Doctoring the Mind: Why Psychiatric Treatments Fail Ebook DOCTORING THE MIND: WHY PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENTS FAIL PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Richard P. Bentall | 384 pages | 03 Jun 2010 | Penguin Books Ltd | 9780141023694 | English | London, United Kingdom Beyond antipsychiatry? The politics of mental illness | Overland literary journal Starting with surprising evidence from the World Health Organisation that suggests people recover better from mental illness in a developing country than in the first world, Mind Medicine on Trial asks the question- how good are our mental health services, really? In this taut and finely argued book, Richard Bentall picks apart the science that underlies much current psychiatric practice across the US and UK. Challenging everything from the trials by which drugs are approved to the veracity of studies conducted that support drug treatment, and drawing on research he himself has conducted over the course of twenty years, Doctoring the Mind is surprising and humane, bringing the experience of both patients and mental health professionals into focus. Arguing passionately for a future of mental health treatment that focuses as much on the patients as individuals as on the brain itself, this is a book set to redefine our understanding of the treatment of madness in the twenty-first century. Account Options Anmelden. Meine Mediathek Hilfe Erweiterte Buchsuche. E-Book anzeigen. Richard P. Check all that apply - Please note that only the first page is available if you have not selected a reading option after clicking "Read Article". Include any more information that will help us locate the issue and fix it faster for you. The author dissects what he considers to be myths about mental illness. Enjoy affordable access to over 18 million articles from more than 15, peer-reviewed journals. Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15, scientific journals. See the journals in your area. Save searches from Google Scholar, PubMed. You can share this free article with as many people as you like with the url below! We hope you enjoy this feature! Continue with Facebook. Sign up with Google. Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library. Sign Up Log In. Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote. All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser. Open Advanced Search. DeepDyve requires Javascript to function. Please enable Javascript on your browser to continue. Doctoring the mind: why psychiatric treatments Fail Doctoring the mind: why psychiatric treatments Fail Smith, Mike; The author dissects what he considers to be myths about mental illness. Doctoring the mind: why psychiatric treatments Fail Smith, Mike. Download PDF. Share Full Text for Free beta. Web of Science. Let us know here. System error. Please try again! How was the reading experience on this article? The text was blurry Page doesn't load Other:. Details Include any more information that will help us locate the issue and fix it faster for you. Doctoring the Mind: Why psychiatric treatments fail – A New Vision for Mental Health Published on. Flowing text. Best for. Web, Tablet, Phone, eReader. Content protection. Flag as inappropriate. It syncs automatically with your account and allows you to read online or offline wherever you are. Hij stelt dat antipsychotica een effect kunnen hebben in de acute fase van de aandoening, maar dat er veel minder bewijs is voor het gunstige effect van een onderhoudsbehandeling. Hij houdt een pleidooi voor cognitieve gedragstherapie en bespreekt onder andere zijn eigen onderzoek hierin. Bentall illustreert zijn betoog met aangrijpende gevalsbeschrijvingen. Het is echter geen handleiding voor de behandeling van psychotische stoornissen, maar een theoretisch betoog. De auteur stelt dat men meer nadruk moet leggen op het verklaren en behandelen van symptomen en niet op ziektebeelden, maar hij bespreekt niet hoe een verdere onderverdeling van symptomen mogelijk nog betere verklaringen kan geven. Bentall does this well: it is, for example, hard to disagree with his conclusion, having surveyed the plentiful evidence that exists, that "most psychiatric diagnoses are about as scientifically meaningful as star signs". He has a deft touch when it comes to summarising, succinctly and accessibly, some of the more complicated technicalities of genetic research, brain biochemistry and statistical analysis the book is aimed at the "intelligent lay reader" as much as at the interested professional. Most psychiatric treatments, historically often unconscionable, are these days usually, of course, in the form of drug treatments either not effective at all or not nearly as effective as is often supposed; too often they may be harmful. The theories of brain functioning on which they rest are tenuous at best. As Bentall notes in his historical overview, all these points have been and are being made often and powerfully by others. Indeed, in the s it looked as though "the medical model", as we talked of it then, might not survive. But survive it did - if anything, more robustly than before. A good part of the reason for this, as he explains, is due to the enormously powerful interests of the drug companies, whose influence on research into the effectiveness of treatment has been, and is still, at least as great as their influence on medical practitioners themselves. Again, this point has also been made penetratingly and sometimes courageously by others. Perhaps the least convincing, or at any rate least effective, part of the book is where Bentall attempts to slide into the place he hopes might be vacated by psychiatry an understanding of mental illness, and an approach to treatment, based on the therapeutic procedures of clinical psychology. Here, however, his erstwhile "scientific" critical standards seem seriously to slip. Whereas, after fairly minute examination, research involving drug trials is found to be wanting, "the quality of psychotherapy trials has often been very good Science, as Bentall knows full well, does not answer questions definitively nor make discoveries beyond dispute. Beyond anti-psychiatry? The politics of mental illness - Left Flank In this taut and finely argued book, Richard Bentall picks apart the science that underlies much current psychiatric practice across the US and UK. Challenging everything from the trials by which drugs are approved to the veracity of studies conducted that support drug treatment, and drawing on research he himself has conducted over the course of twenty years, Doctoring the Mind is surprising and humane, bringing the experience of both patients and mental health professionals into focus. Arguing passionately for a future of mental health treatment that focuses as much on the patients as individuals as on the brain itself, this is a book set to redefine our understanding of the treatment of madness in the twenty-first century. Account Options Anmelden. Meine Mediathek Hilfe Erweiterte Buchsuche. These companies spend much more on advertising than on developing drugs. There are heavy-duty backers to the idea that mental illness is a medical condition that needs to be treated using drugs — follow the cash. This book, referenced to within an inch of its life, points out that on virtually every level the assumptions psychiatry makes about mental illness are both wrong and increase the suffering of those unfortunate enough to be treated according to this paradigm. This is a fascinating, important and infuriating book. View all 12 comments. I'll preface this by saying that I really appreciate the fact the author had the honesty of admitting the presence of personal bias in favour of clinical psychology. It really helped me to moderate my annoyance at some parts of this book. Thank you. I'll also add that I'm writing this as a person who has suffered from chronic depression since the age of twelve, and been treated in a non anglo-saxon EU country. As such, my experience of psychiatry has not been absolutely dominated by Big Pharma I'll preface this by saying that I really appreciate the fact the author had the honesty of admitting the presence of personal bias in favour of clinical psychology. As such, my experience of psychiatry has not been absolutely dominated by Big Pharma thank goodness. I've been researching psychiatry, anti- psychiatry, and looking to critical psychiatry for a while now and thus took to reading this book with a pinch of salt at the ready. I was ready to dump it before even starting it when I saw a review mentioning it as a great asset to the anti-psychiatry movement. I really have no patience for it. A lot of it is made up of fanatics who cry "pseudo-science" at psychiatry when they themselves know little about the nuances of scientific research, or the complexity of it when it adresses the amazing organ that is the brain. A lot of them are also mental illness denialists who have no more compassion for sufferers than the pharmadocs they despise so much. But I decided to give the book a try anyway. Now that I've finished, I'm pretty confident that the author is not, in fact, really anti-psychiatry. Although this was absolutely not apparent at first or even at middle. I'll come back to that. I'll start with what I enjoyed about the book: 1 The historical information was very interesting good History is always fun , and though I knew a bit of it already, I enjoyed learning new things. Although I don't see how these psychological mechanisms exclude the role of intrinsic biology for some people! Ironically though, that last point is problematic for two reasons: a I know for a fact that this method is already being put into practice, and has been for some time.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Psychiatry and Anti-Psychiatry: History, Rhetoric and Reality
    2 (4) 2018 DOI: 10.26319/4717 Daniel Burston, Psychology Department, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh PA [email protected] Psychiatry and Anti-psychiatry: History, Rhetoric and Reality Abstract: The term “anti-psychiatry” was coined in 1912 by Dr. Bernhard Beyer, but only popularized by Dr. David Cooper (and his critics) in the midst of a widespread cultural revolt against involuntary hospitalization and in-patient psychiatry during the 1960s and 1970s. However, with the demise of the old-fashioned mental hospital, and the rise of Big Pharma (with all its attendant evils), the term “anti-psychiatry” has outlived its usefulness. It survives merely as a term of abuse or a badge of honor, depending on the user and what rhetorical work this label is expected to perform. Those who use the term nowadays generally have a polemical axe to grind, and seldom understand the term’s origins or implications. It is time that serious scholars retire this term, or to restrict its use to R.D.Laing’s followers in the Philadelphia Associates and kindred groups that sprang up in the late 1960s and 1970s. Keywords: psychiatry, anti-psychiatry, psychoanalysis, DSM V, Big Pharma, normalization, psychopolitics On November 16, 2016, Dr. Bonnie Burstow, Associate Professor of Adult Education and Community Development at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, which is affiliated with the University of Toronto, launched the first (and thus far, only) scholarship in North America to support doctoral theses on the subject of “anti-psychiatry.” Predictably, this bold gesture garnered praise in some quarters, but provoked a barrage of criticism from both in and outside the university.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Model for Sustainable Mental Health I 1 UNIVERSITEIT TWENTE VOOR DOCENT VAN HET JAAR 2017
    NOMINATIE VAN DE A new model for sustainable mental health I 1 UNIVERSITEIT TWENTE VOOR DOCENT VAN HET JAAR 2017 Een docent die al meerdere malen tot beste docent bij zijn eigen opleiding is verkozen, altijd hele positieve studentbeoordelingen krijgt en afgelopen jaar ook nog eens de titel ‘Docent van het Jaar 2016’ van deERNST Universiteit TwenteT. BOHLMEIJER heeft ontvangen, verdient hetAND wat ons betreft ook om de ISO Docent van hetGERBEN Jaar 2017 award J. teWESTERHOF winnen. Daarom dragen wij met trots Martin van der Hoef voor, docent bij de bacheloropleiding scheikundige technologie, de masteropleiding chemical engineering en bij het University College Twente (ATLAS). Hij geeft onder andere de abstractere vakken thermodynamicaA enNEW quantummechanica MODEL (in de Bachelor) en fasenlee FORr (in de Master). LOOPBAAN tijd op onderwijs komen te liggen. Hiervoor Martin van der Hoef heeft zelf ook aan de heeft hij een goede wetenschappelijke carrière Universiteit TwenteSUSTAINABLE gestudeerd, Applied opgegeven (op het moment dat hij terug- Physics. Na zijn PhD te behalen en daaropvol- keerde naar Twente had Martin meer dan 50 gend een Postdoc aan de University of Oxford publicaties op zijn naam staan), om zich vrijwel gevolgd te hebben, is hij weer teruggekomen volledig op onderwijs te kunnen concentreren. naar Twente.MENTAL Als Associate Professor heeft HEALTHZelf noemt hij dit wellicht een ongebruikelijke Martin hier vervolgens 16 jaar gewerkt. Toen stap, maar hij heeft er nooit spijt van gehad. de hoogleraarINTEGRATING van zijn toenmalige WELL-BEING vakgroep INTODat PSYCHOLOGICALstudenten hier ook blij TREATMENT mee zijn, blijkt wel naar de TU Eindhoven vertrok is hij aanvanke- uit het feit dat hij drie keer de decentrale prijs lijk, samen met anderen, meegegaan.
    [Show full text]
  • Antipsychiatry Movement 29 Wikipedia Articles
    Antipsychiatry Movement 29 Wikipedia Articles PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 00:23:04 UTC Contents Articles Anti-psychiatry 1 History of anti-psychiatry 11 Involuntary commitment 19 Involuntary treatment 30 Against Therapy 33 Dialectics of Liberation 34 Hearing Voices Movement 34 Icarus Project 45 Liberation by Oppression: A Comparative Study of Slavery and Psychiatry 47 MindFreedom International 47 Positive Disintegration 50 Radical Psychology Network 60 Rosenhan experiment 61 World Network of Users and Survivors of Psychiatry 65 Loren Mosher 68 R. D. Laing 71 Thomas Szasz 77 Madness and Civilization 86 Psychiatric consumer/survivor/ex-patient movement 88 Mad Pride 96 Ted Chabasinski 98 Lyn Duff 102 Clifford Whittingham Beers 105 Social hygiene movement 106 Elizabeth Packard 107 Judi Chamberlin 110 Kate Millett 115 Leonard Roy Frank 118 Linda Andre 119 References Article Sources and Contributors 121 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 123 Article Licenses License 124 Anti-psychiatry 1 Anti-psychiatry Anti-psychiatry is a configuration of groups and theoretical constructs that emerged in the 1960s, and questioned the fundamental assumptions and practices of psychiatry, such as its claim that it achieves universal, scientific objectivity. Its igniting influences were Michel Foucault, R.D. Laing, Thomas Szasz and, in Italy, Franco Basaglia. The term was first used by the psychiatrist David Cooper in 1967.[1] Two central contentions
    [Show full text]
  • A Book Review
    Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 523-526, 2010 BOOK REVIEWS Opinion vs. Opinion A Review of: Doctoring the mind: Is our current treatment of mental illness really any good? By Richard P. Bentall New York University, 2009 There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the latter ignorance. Hippocrates Today everyone knows someone who is ‘mentally ill,’ ‘possessed,’ ‘disturbed,’ ‘unhinged,’ or just plain ‘crazy.’ While past generations have been more open to all of these expressions, we have been taught to think only in terms of the first. Working hand in hand, the psychiatric and psychopharmacology establishments have indoctrinated us into the belief that any odd behaviour or unpleasant feeling is due to an illness of either neurobiological or genetic origin. A natural corollary is that drugs are the cure. Doctoring the Mind by Richard Bentall, a professor of clinical psychology at the University of Manchester challenges this belief. After a cursory review of the history of psychiatry with a British slant, he systematically puts under scrutiny psychiatric diagnosis à la Kraeplin and then the DSM, psychiatric theories of genetic and brain factors, and psychiatric drugs. Pointing out methodological problems, statistical manipulations and faulty assumptions, he concludes that “the dominant paradigm in psychiatry, which assumes that mental illnesses are genetically influenced brain diseases, has been a spectacular failure.”(264, emphasis added) “Conventional psychiatry,” he declares, “has been profoundly unscientific and at the same time unsuccessful at helping some of the most distressed and vulnerable people in society.” (vx) His conclusion is convincing as it follows from a critique of psychiatry that appears to be based on a good knowledge of science and the proper interpretation of research results.
    [Show full text]
  • The Demonisation of Psychiatrists in Fiction (And Why Real Psychiatrists Might Want to Do Something About It) Jacqueline Hopson Psychiatric Bulletin 2014, 38:175-179
    EDUCATION & TRAINING The demonisation of psychiatrists in fiction (and why real psychiatrists might want to do something about it) Jacqueline Hopson1 Psychiatric Bulletin (2014), 38,175-179, doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.113.045633 1University of Sheffield Summary To encourage psychiatric practitioners to be aware of and to work to Correspondence to Jacqueline Hopson counteract the representations of the profession as evil manipulators in fiction, film (j.hopson@sheffield.ac.uk) and popular culture. A wide-ranging number of representative sources portraying First received 29 Sep 2013, final psychiatrists are explored. It is demonstrated that psychiatry is overwhelmingly revision 4 Dec 2013, accepted 11 Dec presented in a damagingly negative light. 2013 B 2014 The Royal College of Declaration of interest None. Psychiatrists. This is an open-access article published by the Royal College of Psychiatrists and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Psychiatry has never enjoyed the respect and social prestige believed, often have appallingly evil tendencies. It is these of other medical specialties. In a 2004 survey of medical fictional portrayals of psychiatrists that present the most students, Rajagopal et al found the following reasons were prevalent and readily accessible images of the profession to ‘prominent for not choosing psychiatry’: ‘boring, unscientific, the general public. These are the damagingly negative, depressing, stressful, frustrating and ‘‘did not enjoy rotation’’ widespread representations that dominate the way in which 1 (in that order)’.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Psychiatric Treatments Fail Pdf, Epub, Ebook
    DOCTORING THE MIND: WHY PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENTS FAIL PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Richard P. Bentall | 384 pages | 03 Jun 2010 | Penguin Books Ltd | 9780141023694 | English | London, United Kingdom Doctoring the Mind: Why Psychiatric Treatments Fail PDF Book Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus: Sign up for the editor's highlights Receive World University Rankings news first Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches Participate in reader discussions and post comments Register. One reason he too, I fear, will be beaten back, is that he has no really new weapons in his armoury, and some of the more unfamiliar ones that he attempts to deploy are less than devastating. Please try again later. Sort order. Subscribe to Independent Premium. Enlarge cover. Andrew Grice. Now that I've finished, I'm pretty confident that the author is not, in fact, really anti-psychiatry. Mark Steel. Save searches from Google Scholar, PubMed. If anything, neuroscience, in emphasising the brain's failures, has advocated a more simplistic approach: a chemical imbalance in the brain? Matthew Norman. Angie rated it really liked it Feb 08, Available from Telegraph Books This could mean the medical staff or even the relatives or the patients. Except that we do have a preference for believing in the all-powerful gene. Arguing passionately for a future of mental health treatment that focuses as much on patients as individuals as on the brain itself, this is a book set to redefine our understanding of the treatment of madness in the twenty-first century. Ironically, knowing far more about how the brain works than, say, the 18th-century's William Cullen, or even Freud, seems barely to have improved our ability to treat mental problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Promotion and Prevention in Mental Health: Well-Founded Hope, Futile Illusion Or Psychopathologizing Contraband?
    Articles Papeles del Psicólogo / Psychologist Papers , 2019 Vol. 40(3), pp. 211-216 https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2019.2894 http://www.papelesdelpsicologo.es http:// www.psychologistpapers.com PROMOTION AND PREVENTION IN MENTAL HEALTH: WELL-FOUNDED HOPE, FUTILE ILLUSION OR PSYCHOPATHOLOGIZING CONTRABAND? Félix Cova Solar, Pamela Grandón Fernández, Sandra Saldivia Borquez, Carolina Inostroza Rovegno and Consuelo Novoa Rivera Universidad de Concepción La promoción y prevención en salud mental son crecientemente reconocidas como estrategias fundamentales. Se ha demostra - do que programas promocionales y preventivos en esta área pueden ser efectivos. Existe la expectativa de que la disemi - nación de estos programas pueda ayudar a disminuir la brecha entre necesidades de atención en salud mental y recursos disponibles. Junto con describir estos antecedentes, este artículo analiza algunos desafíos centrales para que esta área pueda tener el desarrollo esperado. Se plantea que si este desarrollo se realiza desde la lógica del modelo médico puede contribuir a generar respuestas inadecuadas y, paradójicamente, a incrementar las necesidades de recursos en salud mental. Se analiza el riesgo que implicaría el uso masivo y recurrente del tamizaje de trastornos mentales desde una concepción medicalizadora. Se propone que el desarrollo de la promoción y prevención en salud mental es un desafío mayor y necesario pero que debe atender a las advertencias de lo que se denomina prevención cuaternaria. Palabras clave: Promoción-prevención-salud mental-prevención cuaternaria-tamizaje. Promotion and prevention are increasingly recognized as essential strategies in mental health. It has been shown that promo - tional and preventive programs in this area can be effective. It is expected that spreading these programs may help to de - crease the gap between the assistance needs in mental health and the resources available.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Psychiatry Should Be Abolished As a Medical Specialty
    Why Psychiatry Should Be Abolished as a Medical Specialty Wayne Ramsay, J.D. “The fact is that this institution of psychiatry has just done monstrous, monstrous inestimable harm through its several hundred year existence.” Peter R. Breggin, M.D., a psychiatrist, “The Dr. Peter Breggin Hour — 10.03.18” — October 3, 2018 at 58:45 point: https://drpeterbregginshow .podbean.com/e/the-dr-peter-breggin-hour- %E2%80%93-100318/ “Psychiatry is failing because it is everywhere being exposed as the facile and destructive hoax that it is.” Psychologist Philip Hickey, Ph.D., “Psychiatry Bashing”, Behaviorism and Mental Health, March 7, 2016, http://behaviorismandmentalhealth.com /2016/03/07/psychiatry-bashing/ “PSYCHIATRY is an emperor standing naked in his new clothes. It has striven for 70 years to become an emperor, a full brother with the other medical specialties. And now it stands there resplendent in its finery. But it does not have any clothes on, and even worse, nobody has told it so. To tell an emperor that he does not have any clothes on has never been advocated as the best way to win friends. The alternative, however, is equally painful, for you must then become part of the general delusion.” — E. Fuller Torrey, M.D., in the Preface to his book The Death of Psychiatry (Penguin Books 1974) “Psychiatry remains as reluctant as ever to recognize the devastating impact of its treatments upon the minds and brains of its patients.” Psychiatrist Peter R. Breggin, M.D., “Coercion of Voluntary Patients in an Open Hospital”, Archives of General Psychiatry
    [Show full text]
  • Western Models for Mental Health: a Cautionary Note
    Western models for mental health: A cautionary note Richard P. Bentall Severe mental illness (psychosis; conditions in which the individual to treat than other kinds of mental illness. Perhaps there are special is said to in some sense lose touch with reality, and in which kinds of stresses in the developed world, which make recovery more hallucinations and delusions – abnormal beliefs – are prominent difficult despite the existence of effective treatments. An alternative symptoms) has a major impact on the well-being of individuals and possibility is that, despite widespread support, there is something the prosperity of nations. Individuals with severe mental illness are fundamentally wrong with the Western biomedical approach. Here I typically diagnosed as suffering from ‘schizophrenia’, ‘bipolar briefly address two false assumptions made by the Western disorder’ or related conditions. These conditions are associated with biomedical approach that go some way to explaining its failure. a high risk of suicide, prolonged disability, loss of economic productivity, and very high costs to carers and governments (see Assumption 1 Bentall, 2009). There are many different kinds of psychiatric disorder, Not surprisingly, in the developed world these conditions are the which are qualitatively distinct from healthy functioning focus of well-resourced psychiatric services. In the second half of the 20th century, many new treatments were developed for Any rational scientific system requires a way of classifying the patients with psychosis, including antipsychotic and other drug phenomena of interest. Modern psychiatry uses diagnostic therapies (Healy, 2004), and also psychological treatments such as concepts similar to those employed in physical medicine to behavioural family therapy and cognitive behaviour therapy (Pilling differentiate between different kinds of psychiatric disorders.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Manifesto for a Social Materialist Psychology of Distress
    DRAFT MANIFESTO FOR A SOCIAL MATERIALIST PSYCHOLOGY OF DISTRESS Journal of Critical Psychology, Counselling and Psychotherapy 12,2: 93-107 (2012) THE MIDLANDS PSYCHOLOGY GROUP John Cromby Bob Diamond Paul Kelly Paul Moloney Penny Priest David Smail Jan Soffe-Caswell Numbers in square brackets [p.xx] refer to page numbers in the published version. In this version we have corrected some minor errors that crept into the version published in the JCPCP (including an error in the attribution of authorship). CONTACT: [email protected] [p.93]Draft Manifesto for a Social Materialist Psychology of Distress ABSTRACT This paper explains the shared background and working practices of the authors; identifies the main assumptions of a social materialist psychology; and sets out a manifesto showing what it might mean to consider distress from a social materialist perspective. INTRODUCTION What follows is aimed in part, but not exclusively, at people in the ‘psy’ professions who seldom have any other vocabulary with which to talk about these issues - outside of psychiatry, on the one hand, and talking therapy on the other. The article marshals a wide range of theory and research on the kinds of misery that get treated by mental health professionals. We are a group of psychologists: clinical, counselling and academic. We have been meeting regularly since 2003. We call ourselves social materialist psychologists. This is not necessarily a formally worked-out philosophical stance. Most psychology is individual and idealist. It takes the individual as a given unit of analysis, and treats the social as a somewhat optional and often uniform context.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Shared Practice in Non-Medicalised Health Care' Conference Flyer
    CONFERENCE IN CELEBRATION OF 20 YEARS OF PCCS BOOKS Shared practice in non-medicalised mental health care 16th October 2013 10.00 am–4.30 pm Clarendon Suites, Edgbaston, Birmingham B16 9SB PCCS Books is celebrating 20 years of independent publishing this year with a one-day conference bringing together experts in their fields who share the desire for honest, democratic, equal and fully informed care for people in distress. The speakers represent the dominant themes in PCCS Books’ lists: person-centred psychology, critical psychology and psychiatry, and service-user perspectives. Speakers Richard Bentall Professor of Psychology, University of Liverpool Mick Cooper Professor of Counselling, University of Strathclyde Jacqui Dillon Chair of Hearing Voices Network, England Stephen Joseph Professor of Psychology, Health and Social Care, University of Nottingham Joanna Moncrieff Senior Lecturer in Psychiatry, University College London and Co-chair of the Critical Psychiatry Network Lisbeth Sommerbeck Client-centred clinical psychologist, accredited specialist in psychotherapy, Danish Psychological Association For service users, carers, professionals, students and everyone interested in critical debate on mental health care All profits to Soteria Network UK www.pccs-books.co.uk Shared Practice in Non-medicalised Mental Health Care Richard Bentall: The myth that schizophrenia is a genetic disease The idea that schizophrenia is an inherited disease has been treated as an axiom rather than a hypothesis throughout the history of psychiatry. Recent expensively funded attempts to find the molecular basis of schizophrenia have been justified by the high heritability coefficient (> 70%) calculated from twin studies. Because this coefficient has been widely misunderstood as a gene/environment causation ratio, high values have been assumed to mean that the causes of schizophrenia are mostly genetic.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Modernist Schizophrenia: from Phenomenology to Cultural Pathology
    LATE MODERNIST SCHIZOPHRENIA: FROM PHENOMENOLOGY TO CULTURAL PATHOLOGY A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Jonathan Gagas May 2014 Examining Committee Members: Daniel T. O'Hara, Advisory Chair, Department of English Sheldon Brivic, Department of English Alan Singer, Department of English Robert L. Caserio, External Member, The Pennsylvania State University, Department of English © Copyright 2014 by Jonathan Gagas All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT My dissertation explains the problematic nature of using the diagnostic category schizophrenia as a cultural metaphor, whether the disorder is stigmatized or romanticized, and demonstrates how representations of schizophrenic characters in novels can combat widespread misuses of psychiatric terms and help readers empathize with mentally ill people if we read these novels with some understanding of psychiatry and the psychoanalysis that influenced them. Public understanding of psychiatry and psychology has played an increasingly important role in mentally ill people’s prospects for recovery as inpatient care has given way to outpatient care supplemented by patients’ families and communities during the past half century. Many people with severe mental illnesses end up homeless or in prison not only because of cuts to services that help them work toward autonomy and social integration, but also because of how their communities treat them, from ignorance and misunderstanding of mental health issues to the stigma that often accompanies mental illness. Contemporary scholars and artists have much to learn about changing attitudes toward mental disorder through an examination of the schizophrenia concept’s migration from the mental health professions to fiction and cultural theory.
    [Show full text]