DOCSLIB.ORG

Why Psychiatric Treatments Fail Pdf, Epub, Ebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Why Psychiatric Treatments Fail Pdf, Epub, Ebook DOCTORING THE MIND: WHY PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENTS FAIL PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Richard P. Bentall | 384 pages | 03 Jun 2010 | Penguin Books Ltd | 9780141023694 | English | London, United Kingdom Doctoring the Mind: Why Psychiatric Treatments Fail PDF Book Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus: Sign up for the editor's highlights Receive World University Rankings news first Get job alerts, shortlist jobs and save job searches Participate in reader discussions and post comments Register. One reason he too, I fear, will be beaten back, is that he has no really new weapons in his armoury, and some of the more unfamiliar ones that he attempts to deploy are less than devastating. Please try again later. Sort order. Subscribe to Independent Premium. Enlarge cover. Andrew Grice. Now that I've finished, I'm pretty confident that the author is not, in fact, really anti-psychiatry. Mark Steel. Save searches from Google Scholar, PubMed. If anything, neuroscience, in emphasising the brain's failures, has advocated a more simplistic approach: a chemical imbalance in the brain? Matthew Norman. Angie rated it really liked it Feb 08, Available from Telegraph Books This could mean the medical staff or even the relatives or the patients. Except that we do have a preference for believing in the all-powerful gene. Arguing passionately for a future of mental health treatment that focuses as much on patients as individuals as on the brain itself, this is a book set to redefine our understanding of the treatment of madness in the twenty-first century. Ironically, knowing far more about how the brain works than, say, the 18th-century's William Cullen, or even Freud, seems barely to have improved our ability to treat mental problems. Refresh and try again. I really have no patience for it. Ever heard of neuro-plasticity? By Richard Bentall. Doctoring the Mind: Why Psychiatric Treatments Fail Writer The theories of brain functioning on which they rest are tenuous at best. As Bentall notes in his historical overview, all these points have been and are being made often and powerfully by others. There was a problem filtering reviews right now. One of the many fascinating things that Richard P Bentall's excellent book flags up is the lack of progress we seem to have made in the past years. Ever heard of neuro-plasticity? Get to Know Us. The upshot is that the more intrusive treatments have in the past been held to be helpful when they were not: leucotomy, insulin coma, ECT and that drug treatments are often pursued at damaging levels since individual variation is not adequately allowed for. Streaming Hub. It has been a history of disgusting human experimentation, and not just in Nazi Germany - lobotomy, insulin shock, electric shocks to the brain, barbaric surgery including genital mutilation and punishing incarceration are but the tip of a very deep iceberg. View offers. I was impressed by the body of literature he presents to support h I bought this book for its antipsychiatric spirit and now I simply love it for the philosophical, practical and clinical questions it poses for psychology. John Lewis. Furthermore I loved the way he deconstructs the claim that psychiatric meds actually improve the life of a patient in contrast to the seemingly unsupported results of psychotherapy. From the early days of Freud, asylums and Elective Convulsive Therapy to the introduction of psychotic drugs, such as Chlorpromazine and back to the 'kindly face' and Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, he covers the lot and does so very well. Angie rated it really liked it Feb 08, If you were a psychiatrist you mi What is madness? To ask other readers questions about Doctoring the Mind , please sign up. Please try again later. Skip to main content. With a heavy dependence on pills and the profit they bring, psychiatry has been relying on myths and misunderstandings of madness for too long, and builds on methods which can often hinder rather than help the patient. Your email address will not be passed to any other organisation. I also found some of his interpretations to be based on faulty premises, chiefly that the mind and brain are separate, and that just because something can be influenced, even "caused" by our environment and life circumstances, it means it's all about nurture and not about nature i. Enter your email address Continue Continue Please enter an email address Email address is invalid Fill out this field Email address is invalid Email already exists. Subscribe to read the entire article. Richard Bentall has held chairs in clinical psychology at the universities of Liverpool and Manchester, and is currently Professor of Clinical Psychology at the University of Bangor in Wales. Pre-order Books. I really believe you've hit the nail on the head with this site in regards to solving the research-purchase issue. Highly recommend for anyone interested in mental illnesses and psychiatry. Not entirely, but largely. View all 3 comments. The chapters in this book on how psychiatry has become an aloof medical science not so much interested in the patient as in their symptoms and even then only in how to stuff them full of expensive drugs that chemically lobotomise them is infuriating. Doctoring the Mind: Why psychiatric treatments fail. Start 14 day Free Trial. DeepDyve Pro. Jan 24, Neal Alexander rated it liked it. Worthwhile reading by anybody that is interested in issues of mental health. Please be respectful when making a comment and adhere to our Community Guidelines. Doctoring the Mind: Why Psychiatric Treatments Fail Reviews Kss rated it liked it Oct 16, Although I do believe that a review of the latest neuroscience relating especially to teenage brains would greatly enhance and broaden these perspectives for both consumers and professionals. A shrink is basically a friendship prostitute note, I have nothing against prostitution. This site uses cookies: Find out more. Skip to main content. Please follow the detailed Help center instructions to transfer the files to supported eReaders. Top reviews from other countries. Which is why I look up to psychedelic medicine as the potential redeemer of psychobiosocial psychiatry. Anneka rated it liked it Jan 06, Boris Johnson. This should be a scandal, but instead it is passed over mostly in silence. But this is why I disagree with the Dodo conjecture. Please try again later. We may no longer chain "mad" people to walls or apply leeches to their skin, but the moment in the early 19th century when more holistic methods were advocated was quickly eclipsed when the emerging study of psychiatry sought to establish itself as a science, and did so by becoming as authoritative as possible. Otherwise, you would see the same reactions or lack thereof in people who've had bad experiences! Is it so unreasonable to think that some people have genes that, if activated by certain life events, will make the development of mental illness more likely or more severe? Log in using your social network account. Next page. Toward the end of the twentieth century, the solution to mental illness seemed to be found. I'll start with what I enjoyed about the book: 1 The historical information was very interesting good History is always fun , and though I knew a bit of it already, I enjoyed learning new things. Didn't affect him much but he had a big ego but was a great guy and very likeable. All books sold as complete unless stated otherwise. This book is fantastic. DeepDyve Pro. Review Bentall is one of psychiatry's most eloquent enemies. View all 3 comments. Richard P. Its kingdom secured, psychiatry chose to forget how its territory had been won: much of the early work into the heritability of mental illness had been carried out by Nazi psychiatrists; those same men, and occasionally women, who collaborated in the gassing of 70, mentally ill people inside German psychiatric hospitals, years before the horrors of Auschwitz and Treblinka. Streaming Hub. Dec 12, Mafu Goonbag rated it really liked it. Furthermore I loved the way he deconstructs the claim that psychiatric meds actually improve the life of a patient in contrast to the seemingly unsupported results of psychotherapy. Although a densely packed book it full of insight. Review this product Share your thoughts with other customers. I'm not saying they don't exist, but clearly that statement doesn't represent a universally agreed upon consensus. Everyone interested in mental illness should read this book. Here, however, his erstwhile "scientific" critical standards seem seriously to slip. Doctoring the Mind: Why Psychiatric Treatments Fail Read Online He goes overboard at times tho, which I feel lessens his argument overall. It syncs automatically with your account and allows you to read online or offline wherever you are. Once registered you can read a total of 3 articles each month, plus:. More filters. The real problem with the DSM is that it is used as a bible, not as a set of guidelines, and that it's been heavily corrupted by Big Pharma. He quit because he didn't want to fetch coffee for Mario Andretti. So it stands to reason that, if you are unlucky enough to suffer an episode of psychosis, mania, or schizophrenia — and in Britain you have a three per cent lifetime risk of doing just that — your chances of recovery are better than they would be in Africa or India. Top reviews from Australia. Tiene tantos datos y tantas opiniones interesantes este libro Add to Wishlist. This is probably the result of his personal bias. What if any benefit these treatments have had on the patient in the past or even now.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Psychiatry and Anti-Psychiatry: History, Rhetoric and Reality
    2 (4) 2018 DOI: 10.26319/4717 Daniel Burston, Psychology Department, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh PA [email protected] Psychiatry and Anti-psychiatry: History, Rhetoric and Reality Abstract: The term “anti-psychiatry” was coined in 1912 by Dr. Bernhard Beyer, but only popularized by Dr. David Cooper (and his critics) in the midst of a widespread cultural revolt against involuntary hospitalization and in-patient psychiatry during the 1960s and 1970s. However, with the demise of the old-fashioned mental hospital, and the rise of Big Pharma (with all its attendant evils), the term “anti-psychiatry” has outlived its usefulness. It survives merely as a term of abuse or a badge of honor, depending on the user and what rhetorical work this label is expected to perform. Those who use the term nowadays generally have a polemical axe to grind, and seldom understand the term’s origins or implications. It is time that serious scholars retire this term, or to restrict its use to R.D.Laing’s followers in the Philadelphia Associates and kindred groups that sprang up in the late 1960s and 1970s. Keywords: psychiatry, anti-psychiatry, psychoanalysis, DSM V, Big Pharma, normalization, psychopolitics On November 16, 2016, Dr. Bonnie Burstow, Associate Professor of Adult Education and Community Development at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, which is affiliated with the University of Toronto, launched the first (and thus far, only) scholarship in North America to support doctoral theses on the subject of “anti-psychiatry.” Predictably, this bold gesture garnered praise in some quarters, but provoked a barrage of criticism from both in and outside the university.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Model for Sustainable Mental Health I 1 UNIVERSITEIT TWENTE VOOR DOCENT VAN HET JAAR 2017
    NOMINATIE VAN DE A new model for sustainable mental health I 1 UNIVERSITEIT TWENTE VOOR DOCENT VAN HET JAAR 2017 Een docent die al meerdere malen tot beste docent bij zijn eigen opleiding is verkozen, altijd hele positieve studentbeoordelingen krijgt en afgelopen jaar ook nog eens de titel ‘Docent van het Jaar 2016’ van deERNST Universiteit TwenteT. BOHLMEIJER heeft ontvangen, verdient hetAND wat ons betreft ook om de ISO Docent van hetGERBEN Jaar 2017 award J. teWESTERHOF winnen. Daarom dragen wij met trots Martin van der Hoef voor, docent bij de bacheloropleiding scheikundige technologie, de masteropleiding chemical engineering en bij het University College Twente (ATLAS). Hij geeft onder andere de abstractere vakken thermodynamicaA enNEW quantummechanica MODEL (in de Bachelor) en fasenlee FORr (in de Master). LOOPBAAN tijd op onderwijs komen te liggen. Hiervoor Martin van der Hoef heeft zelf ook aan de heeft hij een goede wetenschappelijke carrière Universiteit TwenteSUSTAINABLE gestudeerd, Applied opgegeven (op het moment dat hij terug- Physics. Na zijn PhD te behalen en daaropvol- keerde naar Twente had Martin meer dan 50 gend een Postdoc aan de University of Oxford publicaties op zijn naam staan), om zich vrijwel gevolgd te hebben, is hij weer teruggekomen volledig op onderwijs te kunnen concentreren. naar Twente.MENTAL Als Associate Professor heeft HEALTHZelf noemt hij dit wellicht een ongebruikelijke Martin hier vervolgens 16 jaar gewerkt. Toen stap, maar hij heeft er nooit spijt van gehad. de hoogleraarINTEGRATING van zijn toenmalige WELL-BEING vakgroep INTODat PSYCHOLOGICALstudenten hier ook blij TREATMENT mee zijn, blijkt wel naar de TU Eindhoven vertrok is hij aanvanke- uit het feit dat hij drie keer de decentrale prijs lijk, samen met anderen, meegegaan.
    [Show full text]
  • Antipsychiatry Movement 29 Wikipedia Articles
    Antipsychiatry Movement 29 Wikipedia Articles PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 00:23:04 UTC Contents Articles Anti-psychiatry 1 History of anti-psychiatry 11 Involuntary commitment 19 Involuntary treatment 30 Against Therapy 33 Dialectics of Liberation 34 Hearing Voices Movement 34 Icarus Project 45 Liberation by Oppression: A Comparative Study of Slavery and Psychiatry 47 MindFreedom International 47 Positive Disintegration 50 Radical Psychology Network 60 Rosenhan experiment 61 World Network of Users and Survivors of Psychiatry 65 Loren Mosher 68 R. D. Laing 71 Thomas Szasz 77 Madness and Civilization 86 Psychiatric consumer/survivor/ex-patient movement 88 Mad Pride 96 Ted Chabasinski 98 Lyn Duff 102 Clifford Whittingham Beers 105 Social hygiene movement 106 Elizabeth Packard 107 Judi Chamberlin 110 Kate Millett 115 Leonard Roy Frank 118 Linda Andre 119 References Article Sources and Contributors 121 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 123 Article Licenses License 124 Anti-psychiatry 1 Anti-psychiatry Anti-psychiatry is a configuration of groups and theoretical constructs that emerged in the 1960s, and questioned the fundamental assumptions and practices of psychiatry, such as its claim that it achieves universal, scientific objectivity. Its igniting influences were Michel Foucault, R.D. Laing, Thomas Szasz and, in Italy, Franco Basaglia. The term was first used by the psychiatrist David Cooper in 1967.[1] Two central contentions
    [Show full text]
  • A Book Review
    Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 523-526, 2010 BOOK REVIEWS Opinion vs. Opinion A Review of: Doctoring the mind: Is our current treatment of mental illness really any good? By Richard P. Bentall New York University, 2009 There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the latter ignorance. Hippocrates Today everyone knows someone who is ‘mentally ill,’ ‘possessed,’ ‘disturbed,’ ‘unhinged,’ or just plain ‘crazy.’ While past generations have been more open to all of these expressions, we have been taught to think only in terms of the first. Working hand in hand, the psychiatric and psychopharmacology establishments have indoctrinated us into the belief that any odd behaviour or unpleasant feeling is due to an illness of either neurobiological or genetic origin. A natural corollary is that drugs are the cure. Doctoring the Mind by Richard Bentall, a professor of clinical psychology at the University of Manchester challenges this belief. After a cursory review of the history of psychiatry with a British slant, he systematically puts under scrutiny psychiatric diagnosis à la Kraeplin and then the DSM, psychiatric theories of genetic and brain factors, and psychiatric drugs. Pointing out methodological problems, statistical manipulations and faulty assumptions, he concludes that “the dominant paradigm in psychiatry, which assumes that mental illnesses are genetically influenced brain diseases, has been a spectacular failure.”(264, emphasis added) “Conventional psychiatry,” he declares, “has been profoundly unscientific and at the same time unsuccessful at helping some of the most distressed and vulnerable people in society.” (vx) His conclusion is convincing as it follows from a critique of psychiatry that appears to be based on a good knowledge of science and the proper interpretation of research results.
    [Show full text]
  • The Demonisation of Psychiatrists in Fiction (And Why Real Psychiatrists Might Want to Do Something About It) Jacqueline Hopson Psychiatric Bulletin 2014, 38:175-179
    EDUCATION & TRAINING The demonisation of psychiatrists in fiction (and why real psychiatrists might want to do something about it) Jacqueline Hopson1 Psychiatric Bulletin (2014), 38,175-179, doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.113.045633 1University of Sheffield Summary To encourage psychiatric practitioners to be aware of and to work to Correspondence to Jacqueline Hopson counteract the representations of the profession as evil manipulators in fiction, film (j.hopson@sheffield.ac.uk) and popular culture. A wide-ranging number of representative sources portraying First received 29 Sep 2013, final psychiatrists are explored. It is demonstrated that psychiatry is overwhelmingly revision 4 Dec 2013, accepted 11 Dec presented in a damagingly negative light. 2013 B 2014 The Royal College of Declaration of interest None. Psychiatrists. This is an open-access article published by the Royal College of Psychiatrists and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Psychiatry has never enjoyed the respect and social prestige believed, often have appallingly evil tendencies. It is these of other medical specialties. In a 2004 survey of medical fictional portrayals of psychiatrists that present the most students, Rajagopal et al found the following reasons were prevalent and readily accessible images of the profession to ‘prominent for not choosing psychiatry’: ‘boring, unscientific, the general public. These are the damagingly negative, depressing, stressful, frustrating and ‘‘did not enjoy rotation’’ widespread representations that dominate the way in which 1 (in that order)’.
    [Show full text]
  • Promotion and Prevention in Mental Health: Well-Founded Hope, Futile Illusion Or Psychopathologizing Contraband?
    Articles Papeles del Psicólogo / Psychologist Papers , 2019 Vol. 40(3), pp. 211-216 https://doi.org/10.23923/pap.psicol2019.2894 http://www.papelesdelpsicologo.es http:// www.psychologistpapers.com PROMOTION AND PREVENTION IN MENTAL HEALTH: WELL-FOUNDED HOPE, FUTILE ILLUSION OR PSYCHOPATHOLOGIZING CONTRABAND? Félix Cova Solar, Pamela Grandón Fernández, Sandra Saldivia Borquez, Carolina Inostroza Rovegno and Consuelo Novoa Rivera Universidad de Concepción La promoción y prevención en salud mental son crecientemente reconocidas como estrategias fundamentales. Se ha demostra - do que programas promocionales y preventivos en esta área pueden ser efectivos. Existe la expectativa de que la disemi - nación de estos programas pueda ayudar a disminuir la brecha entre necesidades de atención en salud mental y recursos disponibles. Junto con describir estos antecedentes, este artículo analiza algunos desafíos centrales para que esta área pueda tener el desarrollo esperado. Se plantea que si este desarrollo se realiza desde la lógica del modelo médico puede contribuir a generar respuestas inadecuadas y, paradójicamente, a incrementar las necesidades de recursos en salud mental. Se analiza el riesgo que implicaría el uso masivo y recurrente del tamizaje de trastornos mentales desde una concepción medicalizadora. Se propone que el desarrollo de la promoción y prevención en salud mental es un desafío mayor y necesario pero que debe atender a las advertencias de lo que se denomina prevención cuaternaria. Palabras clave: Promoción-prevención-salud mental-prevención cuaternaria-tamizaje. Promotion and prevention are increasingly recognized as essential strategies in mental health. It has been shown that promo - tional and preventive programs in this area can be effective. It is expected that spreading these programs may help to de - crease the gap between the assistance needs in mental health and the resources available.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Psychiatry Should Be Abolished As a Medical Specialty
    Why Psychiatry Should Be Abolished as a Medical Specialty Wayne Ramsay, J.D. “The fact is that this institution of psychiatry has just done monstrous, monstrous inestimable harm through its several hundred year existence.” Peter R. Breggin, M.D., a psychiatrist, “The Dr. Peter Breggin Hour — 10.03.18” — October 3, 2018 at 58:45 point: https://drpeterbregginshow .podbean.com/e/the-dr-peter-breggin-hour- %E2%80%93-100318/ “Psychiatry is failing because it is everywhere being exposed as the facile and destructive hoax that it is.” Psychologist Philip Hickey, Ph.D., “Psychiatry Bashing”, Behaviorism and Mental Health, March 7, 2016, http://behaviorismandmentalhealth.com /2016/03/07/psychiatry-bashing/ “PSYCHIATRY is an emperor standing naked in his new clothes. It has striven for 70 years to become an emperor, a full brother with the other medical specialties. And now it stands there resplendent in its finery. But it does not have any clothes on, and even worse, nobody has told it so. To tell an emperor that he does not have any clothes on has never been advocated as the best way to win friends. The alternative, however, is equally painful, for you must then become part of the general delusion.” — E. Fuller Torrey, M.D., in the Preface to his book The Death of Psychiatry (Penguin Books 1974) “Psychiatry remains as reluctant as ever to recognize the devastating impact of its treatments upon the minds and brains of its patients.” Psychiatrist Peter R. Breggin, M.D., “Coercion of Voluntary Patients in an Open Hospital”, Archives of General Psychiatry
    [Show full text]
  • Western Models for Mental Health: a Cautionary Note
    Western models for mental health: A cautionary note Richard P. Bentall Severe mental illness (psychosis; conditions in which the individual to treat than other kinds of mental illness. Perhaps there are special is said to in some sense lose touch with reality, and in which kinds of stresses in the developed world, which make recovery more hallucinations and delusions – abnormal beliefs – are prominent difficult despite the existence of effective treatments. An alternative symptoms) has a major impact on the well-being of individuals and possibility is that, despite widespread support, there is something the prosperity of nations. Individuals with severe mental illness are fundamentally wrong with the Western biomedical approach. Here I typically diagnosed as suffering from ‘schizophrenia’, ‘bipolar briefly address two false assumptions made by the Western disorder’ or related conditions. These conditions are associated with biomedical approach that go some way to explaining its failure. a high risk of suicide, prolonged disability, loss of economic productivity, and very high costs to carers and governments (see Assumption 1 Bentall, 2009). There are many different kinds of psychiatric disorder, Not surprisingly, in the developed world these conditions are the which are qualitatively distinct from healthy functioning focus of well-resourced psychiatric services. In the second half of the 20th century, many new treatments were developed for Any rational scientific system requires a way of classifying the patients with psychosis, including antipsychotic and other drug phenomena of interest. Modern psychiatry uses diagnostic therapies (Healy, 2004), and also psychological treatments such as concepts similar to those employed in physical medicine to behavioural family therapy and cognitive behaviour therapy (Pilling differentiate between different kinds of psychiatric disorders.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Manifesto for a Social Materialist Psychology of Distress
    DRAFT MANIFESTO FOR A SOCIAL MATERIALIST PSYCHOLOGY OF DISTRESS Journal of Critical Psychology, Counselling and Psychotherapy 12,2: 93-107 (2012) THE MIDLANDS PSYCHOLOGY GROUP John Cromby Bob Diamond Paul Kelly Paul Moloney Penny Priest David Smail Jan Soffe-Caswell Numbers in square brackets [p.xx] refer to page numbers in the published version. In this version we have corrected some minor errors that crept into the version published in the JCPCP (including an error in the attribution of authorship). CONTACT: [email protected] [p.93]Draft Manifesto for a Social Materialist Psychology of Distress ABSTRACT This paper explains the shared background and working practices of the authors; identifies the main assumptions of a social materialist psychology; and sets out a manifesto showing what it might mean to consider distress from a social materialist perspective. INTRODUCTION What follows is aimed in part, but not exclusively, at people in the ‘psy’ professions who seldom have any other vocabulary with which to talk about these issues - outside of psychiatry, on the one hand, and talking therapy on the other. The article marshals a wide range of theory and research on the kinds of misery that get treated by mental health professionals. We are a group of psychologists: clinical, counselling and academic. We have been meeting regularly since 2003. We call ourselves social materialist psychologists. This is not necessarily a formally worked-out philosophical stance. Most psychology is individual and idealist. It takes the individual as a given unit of analysis, and treats the social as a somewhat optional and often uniform context.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Shared Practice in Non-Medicalised Health Care' Conference Flyer
    CONFERENCE IN CELEBRATION OF 20 YEARS OF PCCS BOOKS Shared practice in non-medicalised mental health care 16th October 2013 10.00 am–4.30 pm Clarendon Suites, Edgbaston, Birmingham B16 9SB PCCS Books is celebrating 20 years of independent publishing this year with a one-day conference bringing together experts in their fields who share the desire for honest, democratic, equal and fully informed care for people in distress. The speakers represent the dominant themes in PCCS Books’ lists: person-centred psychology, critical psychology and psychiatry, and service-user perspectives. Speakers Richard Bentall Professor of Psychology, University of Liverpool Mick Cooper Professor of Counselling, University of Strathclyde Jacqui Dillon Chair of Hearing Voices Network, England Stephen Joseph Professor of Psychology, Health and Social Care, University of Nottingham Joanna Moncrieff Senior Lecturer in Psychiatry, University College London and Co-chair of the Critical Psychiatry Network Lisbeth Sommerbeck Client-centred clinical psychologist, accredited specialist in psychotherapy, Danish Psychological Association For service users, carers, professionals, students and everyone interested in critical debate on mental health care All profits to Soteria Network UK www.pccs-books.co.uk Shared Practice in Non-medicalised Mental Health Care Richard Bentall: The myth that schizophrenia is a genetic disease The idea that schizophrenia is an inherited disease has been treated as an axiom rather than a hypothesis throughout the history of psychiatry. Recent expensively funded attempts to find the molecular basis of schizophrenia have been justified by the high heritability coefficient (> 70%) calculated from twin studies. Because this coefficient has been widely misunderstood as a gene/environment causation ratio, high values have been assumed to mean that the causes of schizophrenia are mostly genetic.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Modernist Schizophrenia: from Phenomenology to Cultural Pathology
    LATE MODERNIST SCHIZOPHRENIA: FROM PHENOMENOLOGY TO CULTURAL PATHOLOGY A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Jonathan Gagas May 2014 Examining Committee Members: Daniel T. O'Hara, Advisory Chair, Department of English Sheldon Brivic, Department of English Alan Singer, Department of English Robert L. Caserio, External Member, The Pennsylvania State University, Department of English © Copyright 2014 by Jonathan Gagas All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT My dissertation explains the problematic nature of using the diagnostic category schizophrenia as a cultural metaphor, whether the disorder is stigmatized or romanticized, and demonstrates how representations of schizophrenic characters in novels can combat widespread misuses of psychiatric terms and help readers empathize with mentally ill people if we read these novels with some understanding of psychiatry and the psychoanalysis that influenced them. Public understanding of psychiatry and psychology has played an increasingly important role in mentally ill people’s prospects for recovery as inpatient care has given way to outpatient care supplemented by patients’ families and communities during the past half century. Many people with severe mental illnesses end up homeless or in prison not only because of cuts to services that help them work toward autonomy and social integration, but also because of how their communities treat them, from ignorance and misunderstanding of mental health issues to the stigma that often accompanies mental illness. Contemporary scholars and artists have much to learn about changing attitudes toward mental disorder through an examination of the schizophrenia concept’s migration from the mental health professions to fiction and cultural theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding and Treating Madness: Biology Or Relationships?
    Understanding and Treating Madness: Biology or Relationships? A review of Doctoring the Mind: Is Our Current Treatment of Mental Illness Really Any Good? by Richard P. Bentall New York, NY: New York University Press, 2009. 364 pp. ISBN 978-0-8147-9148-6. $29.95 Reviewed by Arthur C. Bohart Richard Bentall’s thesis can be stated simply. He says at the end of Doctoring the Mind: Is Our Current Treatment of Mental Illness Really Any Good?: In this book I have argued that, by any reasonable standard, the dominant paradigm in psychiatry, which assumes that mental illnesses are genetically influenced brain diseases, has been a spectacular failure. Despite enormous expense, its benefits for those suffering from the most severe forms of mental disorder have been slight. [Psychiatry’s] failures have been the consequence of tenaciously held but erroneous assumptions about the nature of mental illness. They reflect a kind of intellectual myopia, which has blinded professionals to the fact that the distress in human beings is usually caused by unsatisfactory relationships with other human beings. They are the consequence of ignoring what has been obvious to most ordinary people, that warmth and kindness are necessary to promote psychological healing. What is needed is a more compassionate approach that places the therapeutic relationship at the center of clinical practice. (pp. 264–265) Bentall espouses a position that some might call antipsychiatric, and he has been lumped into that grouping. However, he denies that he is an antipsychiatrist. Indeed, he is distinctly different from the critics of psychiatry of the 1960s such as R.
    [Show full text]