CLOUD TYPES Radiation Fog

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

CLOUD TYPES Radiation Fog Radiational cooling of the ground Los Angeles smog Contrails are formed by the condensation and freezing of the water vapor as jet exhaust mixes with very cold air, similar to formation of steam fog. Fig. 4-34, p.106 Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744-1829), a French naturalist, made a first attempt at classifying clouds… Å …but Luke Howard (1772-1864) was more successful with a classification based on the latin names cirrus, cumulus, and stratus. In 1887 the British meteorologist Ralph Abercromby traveled around the world to make sure that “all clouds were the same”. In 1891, Luke Howard’s classification was recommended at the International Conference in Munich. Fig. 4-30, p.104 Cirrus Fig. 4-19, p.97 Cirrocumulus Fig. 4-20, p.98 Cirrostratus with 23° ice crystal halo Fig. 4-21, p.98 Altocumulus Fig. 4-22, p.99 Altocumulus mixed with altostratus Altostratus Fig. 4-23, p.99 Nimbostratus Fig. 4-24, p.100 Broken stratocumulus Fig. 4-25, p.100 Stratus Fig. 4-26, p.101 Small fair-weather cumulus Fig. 4-27, p.101 A marine cloudscape: Cumulus under distant altostratus Cumulus ‘Pyrocumulus’ forming as a Condensation result of buoyant level air created by a fire Cumulus congestus Fig. 4-28, p.102 Congestus rising through altostratus with overlying cirrus Cumulus congestus developing into cumulonimbus Fig. 5-11, p.119 Cumulonimbus with ice crystal anvil extending to left Fig. 4-29, p.103 Distant cumulonimbus anvil Mammatus on underside of a cumulonimbus anvil Fig. 4-33, p.106 Lenticular clouds Fig. 5-14, p.121 Pileus cloud atop a growing cumulus congestus cloud Fig. 4-32, p.105 Nacreous clouds form in the ultracold polar lower stratosphere. CFCs + nacreous clouds form the Antarctic ozone hole Fig. 4-35, p.107 Noctilucent clouds near the mesopause (75-90 km altitude), seen in high latitudes Fig. 4-36, p.107 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Observational Estimates of Detrainment and Entrainment in Non-Precipitating Shallow Cumulus
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 21–33, 2016 www.atmos-chem-phys.net/16/21/2016/ doi:10.5194/acp-16-21-2016 © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Observational estimates of detrainment and entrainment in non-precipitating shallow cumulus M. S. Norgren1, J. D. Small2, H. H. Jonsson3, and P. Y. Chuang4 1Dept. of Physics, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA 2Dept. of Meteorology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA 3Center for Interdisciplinary Remotely-Piloted Aircraft Studies, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, USA 4Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA Correspondence to: P. Y. Chuang ([email protected]) Received: 4 July 2014 – Published in Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.: 26 August 2014 Revised: 27 November 2015 – Accepted: 3 December 2015 – Published: 14 January 2016 Abstract. Vertical transport associated with cumulus clouds method could be readily used with data from other previous is important to the redistribution of gases, particles, and en- aircraft campaigns to expand our understanding of detrain- ergy, with subsequent consequences for many aspects of the ment for a variety of cloud systems. climate system. Previous studies have suggested that detrain- ment from clouds can be comparable to the updraft mass ﬂux, and thus represents an important contribution to ver- 1 Introduction tical transport. In this study, we describe a new method to deduce the amounts of gross detrainment and entrainment One of the important ways cumulus clouds affect the at- experienced by non-precipitating cumulus clouds using air- mosphere is through vertical transport. The redistribution craft observations.
[Show full text]
Dicionarioct.Pdf
McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Earth Science Second Edition McGraw-Hill New York Chicago San Francisco Lisbon London Madrid Mexico City Milan New Delhi San Juan Seoul Singapore Sydney Toronto Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Manufactured in the United States of America. Except as permitted under the United States Copyright Act of 1976, no part of this publication may be repro- duced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher. 0-07-141798-2 The material in this eBook also appears in the print version of this title: 0-07-141045-7 All trademarks are trademarks of their respective owners. Rather than put a trademark symbol after every occurrence of a trademarked name, we use names in an editorial fashion only, and to the benefit of the trademark owner, with no intention of infringement of the trademark. Where such designations appear in this book, they have been printed with initial caps. McGraw-Hill eBooks are available at special quantity discounts to use as premiums and sales promotions, or for use in corporate training programs. For more information, please contact George Hoare, Special Sales, at [email protected] or (212) 904-4069. TERMS OF USE This is a copyrighted work and The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. (“McGraw- Hill”) and its licensors reserve all rights in and to the work. Use of this work is subject to these terms. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act of 1976 and the right to store and retrieve one copy of the work, you may not decom- pile, disassemble, reverse engineer, reproduce, modify, create derivative works based upon, transmit, distribute, disseminate, sell, publish or sublicense the work or any part of it without McGraw-Hill’s prior consent.
[Show full text]
The Ten Different Types of Clouds
THE COMPLETE GUIDE TO THE TEN DIFFERENT TYPES OF CLOUDS AND HOW TO IDENTIFY THEM Dedicated to those who are passionately curious, keep their heads in the clouds, and keep their eyes on the skies. And to Luke Howard, the father of cloud classification. 4 Infographic 5 Introduction 12 Cirrus 18 Cirrocumulus 25 Cirrostratus 31 Altocumulus 38 Altostratus 45 Nimbostratus TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE 51 Cumulonimbus 57 Cumulus 64 Stratus 71 Stratocumulus 79 Our Mission 80 Extras Cloud Types: An Infographic 4 An Introduction to the 10 Different An Introduction to the 10 Different Types of Clouds Types of Clouds ⛅ Clouds are the equivalent of an ever-evolving painting in the sky. They have the ability to make for magniﬁcent sunrises and spectacular sunsets. We’re surrounded by clouds almost every day of our lives. Let’s take the time and learn a little bit more about them! The following information is presented to you as a comprehensive guide to the ten different types of clouds and how to idenify them. Let’s just say it’s an instruction manual to the sky. Here you’ll learn about the ten different cloud types: their characteristics, how they differentiate from the other cloud types, and much more. So three cheers to you for starting on your cloud identiﬁcation journey. Happy cloudspotting, friends! The Three High Level Clouds Cirrus (Ci) Cirrocumulus (Cc) Cirrostratus (Cs) High, wispy streaks High-altitude cloudlets Pale, veil-like layer High-altitude, thin, and wispy cloud High-altitude, thin, and wispy cloud streaks made of ice crystals streaks
[Show full text]
The Kiwi Kids Cloud Identification Guide
Droplets The Kiwi Kids Cloud Identification Guide Written by Paula McKean Droplets The Kiwi Kids Cloud Identification Guide ISBN 1-877264-27-X Paula McKean MEd Hons (Science Ed), BEd, DipTchg 2009 © Crown Copyright 2009 Contents 1. Cloud Classification 2. How Clouds are formed 3. The Water Cycle 4. Cumulus Altitudes 5. Stratus Altitudes 6. Precipitating Cloud Altitudes 7. Cirrus Cloud Altitudes 8. Cumulus 10. Altocumulus 12. Cirrocumulus 14. Stratus 16. Stratocumulus 18. Altostratus 20. Cirrostratus 22. Nimbostratus 24. Cumulus Congestus 26. Cumulonimbus 28. Cirrus 30. Contrails 32. References 33. Acknowledgements Cloud Classification Since Luke Howard developed the first cloud classification system in 1802, clouds have been classified according to the altitude of the cloud base and the shape of the cloud. There are three main categories: Low level- Clouds that form below 2000 m: Cumulus, Stratocumulus, Stratus (including Fog, Haze and Mist), Nimbostratus and Cumulonimbus. Mid level - Clouds that form between 2000 m and 7000 m: Altocumulus and Altostratus. High level - Clouds that form above 5000 m: Cirrus, Cirrocumulus, Cirrostratus and Contrails. In this guide cloud types have been organised by their characteristics so it is easier to distinguish between clouds that appear to be similar and to help determine the cloud type when the altitude can’t be determined. Clouds have been grouped into four categories: • Cumulus (heaped, puffy appearing clouds). • Stratus (flat clouds that extend over large sections of sky). • Precipitating (clouds that can produce rain, hail or snow). • Cirrus (wispy high altitude clouds). By using a combination of the altitude system and characteristic based system used in this guide, cloud identification will be easier and more accurate.
[Show full text]
Observational Estimates of Detrainment and Entrainment in Non-Precipitating
1 Observational estimates of detrainment and entrainment in non-precipitating 2 shallow cumulus 1 2 3 4∗ 3 Matthew S. Norgren , Jennifer D. Small , Haidi H. Jonsson , Patrick Y. Chuang 4 1. Dept. of Physics, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA 5 2. Department of Meteorology, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA 6 3. Center for Interdisciplinary Remotely-Piloted Aircraft Studies, Naval Postgraduate School, 7 CA, USA 8 4. Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA ∗ 9 Corresponding author email: [email protected] 10 1 11 Abstract 12 Vertical transport associated with cumulus clouds is important to the redistribution of gases, 13 particles and energy, with subsequent consequences for many aspects of the climate system. 14 Previous studies have suggested that detrainment from clouds can be comparable to the 15 updraft mass ux, and thus represents an important contribution to vertical transport. In 16 this study, we describe a new method to deduce the amounts of gross detrainment and 17 entrainment experienced by non-precipitating cumulus clouds using aircraft observations. 18 The method utilizes equations for three conserved variables: cloud mass, total water and 19 moist static energy. Optimizing these three equations leads to estimates of the mass fractions 20 of adiabatic mixed-layer air, entrained air and detrained air that the sampled cloud has 21 experienced. The method is applied to six ights of the CIRPAS Twin Otter during the Gulf 22 of Mexico Atmospheric Composition and Climate Study (GoMACCS) which took place in the 23 Houston, Texas region during the summer of 2006 during which 176 small, non-precipitating 24 cumulus were sampled.
[Show full text]
Volume 28 Number 1 April 1 996 Weathermodification Association - the JOURNAL of WEATHERMOD/FICATION
Volume 28 Number 1 April 1 996 WeatherModification Association - THE JOURNAL OF WEATHERMOD/FICATION- CO VER: Hydrometeoridentification with polarization radar. NOAA/EnvironmentalTechnology Laboratory Ka-band (8. 66 ram) radar RHI images from a winter snowstorm observed during the Winter Icing and Storms Project (2 km range rings, 2039 UTC08 February 1994, Erie, Colorado). Reflectivity (top image) showsa vertical slice through a precipi- tating, -5 to + 11 dBZ convective cell, and an underlying -7 to -20 dBZ layer cloud. The correspondingelliptical depolarization ratio (EDR,bottom image) defines three distinct polarization regimes, one of the convective cloud, one for the layer cloud, and one where the hydrometeors from the two are mixing. In the layer cloud, EDRchanges sig- nificantly (by 10 dB) from low elevation angles to zenith; this pattern and the depolari- zation values matchtheory for ice crystals of the thick plate growth habit. In the con- vective cell, EDRis invariant with elevation angle but larger in magnitudethan a -14.8 dB value corresponding to spheres and drizzle; this signature corresponds to less-than- spherical graupel. These signatures were verified by samples of graupel that scavenged thick plates, taken at the ground in the zone of the mix (insert, sample from the NCAR microphysics van). See article by Reinking, Matrosov, and Bruintjes in this issue for applications to weather modification. (Cover photo courtesy Roger Reinking, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) Inside back cover: Attendees of the 44th Annual Meeting held in Durango, Colorado, May 1995. (Photos by the Editor) EDITED BY~ PRINTEDBY: JamesR. Miller, Editor Fenske Printing Connie K. Crandall, Editorial Assistant Rapid City, South Dakota USA Institute of Atmospheric Sciences South Dakota School of Mines and Technology 501 E.
[Show full text]
Cloud Microphysics Studies for Texas Hiplex 1979
PRELIMINARY CLOUD MICROPHYSICS STUDIES FOR TEXAS HIPLEX 1979 LP-124 TWDB CONTRACT NOS. 14-90026 AND 14-00003 Prepared by: DEPARTMENT OF METEOROLOGY COLLEGE OF GEOSCIENCES TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS Prepared for: TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES AUSTIN, TEXAS Funded by: DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, WATER AND POWER RESOURCES SERVICE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES APRIL 1980 M8-H0O (3-78) Buruau of Reclamation TECHNICAL REPORT STANDARD TITLE PAGE 1. REPORT NO. 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NO. 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE S. REPORT OATE Preliminary Cloud Microphysics Studies March, 1980 for Texas HIPLEX 1979 6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE 330 7. AUTHORIS) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO. Alexis B. Long LP-124 9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS 10. WORK UNIT NO. Texas Department of Water Resources 5540 P.O. Box 13087, Capitol Station 11. CONTRACT OR GRANT NO. Austin, TX 78711 14-06-D-7587 13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVEREO 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS Office of Atmospheric Resources Management T echnical Water and Power Resources Service Building 67, Denver Federal Center 14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE Denver, Colorado 80225 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES 16. ABSTRACT Cloud microphysics studies made in connection with Texas HIPLEX 1979 are described. Any results, however, must be regarded as preliminary and sub ject to revision based on further work. The objective is to determine important natural precipitation mechanisms in summertime convective clouds in the Big Spring, Texas area. Studies are based on data collected by twq instrumented aircraft. Operational procedures used for collecting data are described. Rules used for selecting clouds microphysically suitable for study are listed.
[Show full text]
Article Relabelling Symme- Tation Activity Index for Different Seasons and Utilising the Try and the Energy-Vorticity Theory of fluid Mechanics, Meteorol
Adv. Geosci., 16, 33–41, 2008 www.adv-geosci.net/16/33/2008/ Advances in © Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed under Geosciences the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Process-oriented statistical-dynamical evaluation of LM precipitation forecasts A. Claußnitzer, I. Langer, P. Nevir,´ E. Reimer, and U. Cubasch Institut fur¨ Meteorologie, Freie Universitat¨ Berlin Carl-Heinrich-Becker-Weg 6-10, D-12165 Berlin, Germany Received: 1 August 2007 – Revised: 10 January 2008 – Accepted: 29 February 2008 – Published: 9 April 2008 Abstract. The objective of this study is the scale dependent Lin, 2003). Alternatively, the ageostrophic horizontal diver- evaluation of precipitation forecasts of the Lokal-Modell gence weighted with the specific humidity is used to esti- (LM) from the German Weather Service in relation to dy- mate diagnostic precipitation rates (Spar, 1953; Palmen´ and namical and cloud parameters. For this purpose the newly de- Holopainen, 1962; Banacos and Schultz, 2005). Other re- signed Dynamic State Index (DSI) is correlated with clouds search groups deal with the statistical analysis of precipita- and precipitation. The DSI quantitatively describes the devi- tion processes to investigate a multifractal (e.g. Olsson et al. , ation and relative distance from a stationary and adiabatic so- 1993; Tessier et al., 1993; Lovejoy and Schertzer, 1995) and lution of the primitive equations. A case study and statistical a chaotic behaviour (Rodriguez-Iturbe et al., 1989; Sivaku- analysis of clouds and precipitation demonstrates the avail- mar, 2001). In particular, there is an indication that convec- ability of the DSI as a dynamical threshold parameter. This tive precipitation is linked to self-organised critical phenom- confirms the importance of imbalances of the atmospheric ena, with the saturation of water vapour as the dynamical flow field, which dynamically induce the generation of rain- threshold (Peters and Christensen, 2006).
[Show full text]
Cloud Photo 1
Cloud Photo 1 Ian Macfarlane 12 October 2015 Flow Visualization Purpose The purpose of this image is to depict and illustrate how well clouds in our everyday atmosphere can be a great representation of fluid dynamics. In the course Flow Visualization it is important to understand and capture fluid phenomena in any way. The cloud assignment allows for the students of the course to appreciate how well the clouds represent fluid and then further allow us to understand the physics behind different clouds seen on a daily basis. The image above represents clouds in an unstable environment taken from above, out of the window of an airplane. Other photos were taken in the Boulder area but this photo was chosen as it gives a different perspective from the other photos taken on the ground. Image Details As stated above this image was taken from the window of an airplane, a Boeing 737. This image was taken on September 7th on a flight from San Diego to Denver at 1 pm. While just under an hour through the flight, above Arizona, the image was captured from the back of the airplane through one of the passenger windows with an iPhone. The image was taken at about a 30-degree angle downward from the horizontal plane. As we were travelling east leaving San Diego there were no clouds, farther left of the image, and as we travelled further east more and more clouds began to appear. Cloud Description This image captures clouds in an unstable atmosphere. The main cloud in the focus of this photo is considered to most likely be a cumulus castellanus cloud.
[Show full text]
A History of the Lightning Launch Commit Criteria and the Lightning Advisory Panel for America's Space Program
NASA/SP—2010–216283 A History of the Lightning Launch Commit Criteria and the Lightning Advisory Panel for America’s Space Program Francis J. Merceret, Editor NASA, John F. Kennedy Space Center John C. Willett, Editor Air Force Research Laboratory (Retired) Hugh J. Christian University of Alabama in Huntsville James E. Dye National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado E. Phillip Krider University of Arizona, Department of Atmospheric Sciences John T. Madura NASA, John F. Kennedy Space Center T. Paul O’Brien Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, California W. David Rust National Severe Storms Laboratory Richard L. Walterscheid Aerospace Corporation, Space Sciences Department, El Segundo, California National Aeronautics and Space Administration John F. Kennedy Space Center Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899 August 2010 Executive Summary Since natural and artificially-initiated (or ‘triggered’) lightning are demonstrated hazards to the launch of space vehicles, the American space program has responded by establishing a set of Lightning Launch Commit Criteria (LLCC) and Definitions to mitigate the risk. The LLCC apply to all Federal Government ranges and have been adopted by the Federal Aviation Administration for application at state-operated and private spaceports. The LLCC and their associated definitions have been developed, reviewed, and approved over the years of the American space program starting from relatively simple rules in the mid-twentieth century (that were not adequate) to a complex suite for launch operations in the early 21st century. During this evolutionary process, a “Lightning Advisory Panel (LAP)” of top American scientists in the field of atmospheric electricity was established to guide it. This history document provides a context for and explanation of the evolution of the LLCC and the LAP.
[Show full text]
Super-Large Raindrops --...---;--"
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 31 , Ll3102, doi:10.1029/2004GL020167, 2004 Super-large raindrops Peter V. Hobbs and Arthur L. Rangno Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA Received 2 April 2004; revised 21 May 2004; accepted 15 June 2004; published 13 July 2004. [ 1] Raindrops similar or greater in size to the largest ever air in the lower atmosphere (Figure la). Also, under observed, with maximum dimensions of at least 8.8 mm and unstable atmospheric conditions, particularly hot fires possibly 1 em, have been measured in rainshafts beneath spawn and augment convection and cumulus congestus cumulus congestus clouds spawned by a biomass fire in clouds (Figure la). In passing at rv0.5 km below cloud Brazil and in very clean conditions in the Marshall Islands. It base through a narrow (0.8 km wide) transparent rainshaft is proposed that the super-large raindrops were produced by from one of these cumulus congestus clouds, a few unusually the rapid growth of drops colliding with each other within large drops were imaged by the Particle Measuring System's narrow regions of cloud where liquid water contents were (PMS) OAP-2D-P precipitation probe, incorporating an unusually high. In Brazil, the initial growth of super-large array of thirty-two 100 1-1m square photosensitive diodes, raindrops might have been initiated by condensation onto aboard the aircraft (Figure 2a). The largest drop had a giant smoke particles. INDEX TERMS: 1854 Hydrology: maximum recorded dimension of 8.8 mm; its reconstructed Precipitation (3354); 3314 Meteorology and Atmospheric diameter, using the technique described by Heymsfield and Dynamics: Convective processes; 3354 Meteorology and Parrish [1978], was 8.2 mm.
[Show full text]
Weather Note TORNADOES NEAR NAGS HEAD, N.C., in MAY ANDJUNE 1960 FRANK B
20 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW Weather Note TORNADOES NEAR NAGS HEAD, N.C., IN MAY ANDJUNE 1960 FRANK B. DINWIDDIE 1 Nags Head, N.C. [Manuscript received July 18, 1960; revised NovemberI4, 19601 1. TORNADOES ON MAY 11, 1960 A family of suspended funnel clouds and accompanying pendantswas seen at NagsHead on May 11, 1960, between 1520 and 1530 EST. Surfaceconditions at the t,ilne were: wind light and variable, from directions east,, sout'h,and west. Shortly after the episode the wind became SSW about 10 1n.p.h.and continued thus. Sta- G t'ion pressure was 29.82 in.mercury, and rising slowly, temperature 70" I?., steady, dew point 56" F., and relative humidity 64 percent.occurrence Before the of the sv t funnels,cumuli moved from the peninsula between Pamlico and Albelnarlc Sounds and formed into a band. FIGUREl.-Tornado family at Kags Head, S.C., May 11, 1960, 1520 to 1530 EST. The figure was traced from a projected color trarlsparerlcy. Sotc vortices C, F, and C, and pendants B, D, and E;. Pendant B arid vortex C are paired as are E and F. I 1 POLE x I pendant E; apparentlyremains, and pendant or vort,ex G still exists. Unauthenticated | Downloaded 10/07/21 09:45 AM UTC JANUARY1961 MONTHLY TI~EATHERREVIEW 21 CUkJLlJS FRACTUS CLOUD 5-5 * NOT PART OF TORNADO S t- FIGURE4.--Evolutio11 of torrlaclo-~~-vatcrspolItat Kngs Head, J~me27, 1960, 0715 to 0724 EST. The detached tip of stage 8 moved toward t,hc maintube and became part of the tornado in stage 10.
[Show full text]