DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix a Benchmarking Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix a Benchmarking Document Stroud Sustainable Transport Strategy DRAFT Project number: 60598598 Appendix A Benchmarking Document Prepared for: Stroud District Council AECOM 34 Stroud Sustainable Transport Strategy Benchmarking Report Stroud District Council Project number: 60598598 15 November 2019 DRAFT Stroud Sustainable Transport Strategy DRAFT Project number: 60598598 Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorised Name Position 01 15/11/19 Final Distribution List # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name 0 Y SDC, as an appendix to the Sustainable Transport Strategy Prepared for: Stroud District Council Stroud Benchmarking Report_final.docx AECOM Stroud Sustainable Transport Strategy DRAFT Project number: 60598598 Prepared for: Stroud District Council Prepared by: AECOM UK Limited 3rd Floor, Portwall Place Portwall Lane Bristol BS1 6NA United Kingdom © 2019 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. Prepared for: Stroud District Council Stroud Benchmarking Report_final.docx AECOM Stroud Sustainable Transport Strategy DRAFT Project number: 60598598 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 2. Policy Context ......................................................................................... 2 2.1 National Policy and Guidance ........................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Regional Context ............................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Local Policy ..................................................................................................................................... 10 Other ..................................................................................................................................................... 22 3. Review of Local Context ........................................................................ 23 Geographical Context ........................................................................................................................... 23 Demography .......................................................................................................................................... 23 Population Distribution .......................................................................................................................... 24 Social Context – multiple deprivation scores ........................................................................................ 25 Car Ownership ...................................................................................................................................... 26 Economic Performance and Activity ..................................................................................................... 27 Employment Distribution ....................................................................................................................... 27 Unemployment ...................................................................................................................................... 28 Commuting Patterns ............................................................................................................................. 28 4. Existing Transport Conditions ................................................................ 31 Active Travel Network ........................................................................................................................... 31 Bus Network .......................................................................................................................................... 35 Rail Network .......................................................................................................................................... 40 Road Network Characteristics .............................................................................................................. 42 Parking .................................................................................................................................................. 44 Freight Movements ............................................................................................................................... 44 Road Safety .......................................................................................................................................... 46 Appendix A - Stroud District Cycle Map .......................................................... 48 Appendix B - Gloucestershire Travel By-cycle pamphlet ................................ 49 Prepared for: Stroud District Council Stroud Benchmarking Report_final.docx AECOM Stroud Sustainable Transport Strategy DRAFT Project number: 60598598 Figures Figure 1. Vehicle Mile Forecasts for England & Wales. Source: DfT (2018) Road Traffic Forecasts (Figure 25) ............................................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 2. Western Gateway Sub-National Transport Body Area. Source: Western Gateway (2019) Sub-national Transport Body Outline Case Report (p. 1) ..................................................................... 10 Figure 3. Relevant LTP Policy documents ........................................................................................... 11 Figure 4. GCC LTP Network Capacity Management Hierarchy ........................................................... 14 Figure 5. Indicative GCC LTP schedule ............................................................................................... 17 Figure 6. Stroud District area (Source: Gloucestershire County Council Local Transport Plan, p.5). 23 Figure 7. Population age distribution of Stroud District and England .................................................. 24 Figure 8. Population Density ................................................................................................................ 25 Figure 9. Stroud District Index of Multiple Deprivation (2015) ............................................................. 26 Figure 10. Stroud District Car Ownership, per Household (2011 Census) .......................................... 27 Figure 11. Stroud District Employment Distribution (2017 data) .......................................................... 28 Figure 14. Average distance (km) travelled to work ............................................................................. 30 Figure 15 - National Cycle Network ...................................................................................................... 32 Figure 16 - Public Rights of Way ........................................................................................................... 33 Figure 17: Walkable and Cyclable Distances from main town centres ................................................. 34 Figure 18. Bus frequency in Gloucestershire (Source: Gloucestershire Local Transport Plan (2015- 2031) - Policy Document 1 - Bus, 2017) ............................................................................................... 38 Figure 19. Bus Routes by Subsidy ....................................................................................................... 38 Figure 20. Rail Stations within, and in close proximity to the Stroud District ....................................... 41 Figure 21. Road network within the Stroud District .............................................................................. 43 Figure 22. Public Car Parking locations in the Stroud District ............................................................. 44 Figure 23. Average Annual Daily Freight flows by corridor 2012 - 2014 (Source: Gloucestershire Local Transport Plan (2015-2031) - Policy Document 3 - Freight, Nov 2017) ............................................... 45 Figure 24. Primary routes for HGVs and Lorry Management Zone ..................................................... 46 Figure 25. Accidents within the Stroud District between 2013 and 2017 ............................................. 47 Prepared for: Stroud District Council Stroud Benchmarking Report_final.docx AECOM Stroud Sustainable Transport Strategy DRAFT Project number: 60598598 Tables Table 1. Car availability in Gloucestershire .......................................................................................... 26 Table 2. Labour Supply Key Indicator Comparison, Gloucestershire LEP and United Kingdom, Working Age Population (16 to 64 years old) ........................................................................................ 28 Table 3. Journey to Work Mode Share ................................................................................................. 29 Table 4. Bus services within the District ..............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Additional Housing Options Consultation Report
    Stroud District Local Plan Review Additional Housing Options Consultation Report April 2021 Development Services Stroud District Council Ebley Mill Stroud Gloucestershire GL5 4UB The Planning Strategy Team 01453 754143 [email protected] visit www.stroud.gov.uk/localplanreview 1. Introduction 3 4 2. Public consultation 3. Overview of responses 8 4. What you told us 10 Spatial Options Question 1 10 Question 2 11 Question 3 12 Question 4 13 Question 5 14 Question 6 14 New housing sites Question 7 16 Question 8 21 Potential growth points Question 9 21 Question 10 24 Sustainability Appraisal Question 11 24 5. Appendices Appendix 1 Site maps for Question 8 *Maps will be completed for Regulation 19 Consultation STROUD DISTRICT LOCAL PLAN REVIEW | ADDITIONAL HOUSING OPTIONS CONSULTATION Page | 2 1. Introduction 1.1 In November 2019, the Council published and carried out consultation on the Stroud District Council Local Plan Review: Draft Plan for Consultation. The Draft Plan sets out the preferred development strategy for meeting the District’s growth needs for the period to 2040 based on a minimum housing requirement of 638 homes per annum calculated under the Government Standard Method. A separate report analysing responses to the Draft Plan consultation is available to view on the Council’s website at www.stroud.gov.uk/Stroud District Local Plan review. 1.2 In August 2020, the Government published a consultation document proposing changes to the method for calculating the minimum housing requirement for each local authority area in the country. This revised standard method proposed increasing the requirement for Stroud District from 638 homes per annum to 786 homes per annum and a need to plan for a potential additional 1,050 – 2,400 homes between now and 2040.
    [Show full text]
  • Gi200900.Pdf
    Gloucestershire Society for Industrial Archaeology Journal for 2009 Contents Editorial......................................................................................................................................2 From Willow to Wicket: A Lost Cricket Bat Willow Plantation in Leonard Stanley. By Stephen Mills ......................................................................... 3-8 Matthews & Company – Gloucester’s Premier Furniture Manufacturers By Hugh Conway-Jones ......................................................................................... 9-13 Two Recently Discovered Field Books from Sopwith’s Mineral Survey of the Forest of Dean. By Ian Standing ......................................................................... 14-22 The Canal Round House at Inglesham Lock By John Copping (Adapted for the GSIA Journal by Alan Strickland) ..................................................................... 23-35 Upper Redbrook Iron Works 1798-9: David Tanner's Bankruptcy By Pat Morris ...... 36-40 The Malthouse, Tanhouse Farm, Church End, Frampton on Severn, Gloucestershire By Amber Patrick ................................................................................................. 41-46 The Restoration of the Cotswold Canals, July 2010 Update. By Theo Stening .............. 47-50 GSIA Visit Reports for 2009 ............................................................................................. 51-57 Book Reviews ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Preston Neighbourhood Development Plan 2018-2031
    Evidence Paper Design in Preston A Parish Design Statement prepared by the Residents of the Parish of Preston Nr. Cirencester PRESTON NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2019-2031 REGULATION 14 CONSULTATION DRAFTPage | 0 Prepared by Preston Parish Council and Andrea Pellegram MRTPI Design in Preston Introduction 1. Successful Parish/Village Design demands a harmony between traditional and new buildings. This enhances both the appearance of the environment and community life. Future design should, therefore, consider patterns and details which give Preston its special character. 2. This statement is intended to encourage good design by analyzing the characteristic style of Preston and suggesting ways in which it might be applied to all future landscape and building activity in the Parish. 3. This Statement provides guidance to all interested parties; including Cotswold District Council, the Parish Council when considering any planning applications (e.g. developers of new housing in the Parish) and homeowners contemplating work to their property. 4. Appendix 2 of this document discusses the planning policy context relevant to design in Preston. How the Statement was prepared 5. Further to a decision by the Parish Council a Steering Group was set up to prepare the Design Statement. This Steering Group met on a regular basis during 2015/2016 to discuss the content of the Statement and the most suitable way forward. This resulted in the distribution of a questionnaire in October 2015 to all the residents of the Parish. The number of questionnaires returned represented 43% of the properties. Approximately 50% of the Village responded. Analysis of the responses to the questionnaire has enabled the Steering Group to prepare this document which, following completion was presented to the Parish Council for approval.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Gateway ECONOMIC CONNECTIVITY STUDY Final Report
    Regional Evidence Base Appendix A Economic Connectivity Study Western Gateway ECONOMIC CONNECTIVITY STUDY Final Report JULY 2019 PUBLIC Western Gateway ECONOMIC CONNECTIVITY STUDY Final Report TYPE OF DOCUMENT (VERSION) PUBLIC PROJECT NO. 70052842 DATE: JULY 2019 WSP WSP House 70 Chancery Lane London WC2A 1AF Phone: +44 20 7314 5000 Fax: +44 20 7314 5111 WSP.com PUBLIC QUALITY CONTROL Issue/revision First issue Revision 1 Remarks 1st Draft (of report in ‘portrait’ Final Report format) Date 06/05/2019 05/07/2019 Prepared by Fintan Geraghty Fintan Geraghty Jay Atwal Jay Atwal Signature Checked by Fintan Geraghty Fintan Geraghty Signature Authorised by Fintan Geraghty Fintan Geraghty Signature Project number 70052842-001 70052842-001 Report number V1 V2 File reference 70052842-001 project folder 70052842-001 project folder ECONOMIC CONNECTIVITY STUDY PUBLIC | WSP Project No.: 70052842 July 2019 Western Gateway CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 THE WESTERN GATEWAY 1 1.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE WESTERN GATEWAY 2 1.3 ECONOMIC CONNECTIVITY REPORT 2 1.4 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT 3 2 THE STRATEGIC CORRIDORS 5 2.1 INTRODUCTION 5 2.2 WHY IS CORRIDOR CONNECTIVITY SO IMPORTANT? 6 2.3 THE IMPORTANCE OF CONNECTIVITY FOR THE WESTERN GATEWAY 7 2.4 THE 15 CORRIDORS 7 3 THE ECONOMY OF THE WESTERN GATEWAY 13 3.1 INTRODUCTION 13 3.2 THE MAIN THEMES IN THE WESTERN GATEWAY 15 3.3 KEY THEMES SUMMARISED 19 3.4 THE SECTORAL STRENGTHS OF THE WESTERN GATEWAY’S ECONOMY 25 4 HOW IMPROVED CONNECTIVITY CAN BOOST HOUSING AND THE ECONOMY 31 4.1 INTRODUCTION 31 4.2
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Local Transport Plan Consultation Document 1
    Gloucestershire’s Draft Draft Local Transport Plan Local Transport Plan Consultation | DOCUMENT 1 2015-31 Including the following strategy documents: A resilient transport network that enables sustainable economic growth • Overarching Strategy • CPS4 – South Cotswold Connecting Places Strategy providing door to door travel choices • CPS1 - Central Severn Vale Connecting Places Strategy • CPS5 – Stroud Connecting Places Strategy • CPS2 - Forest of Dean Connecting Places Strategy • CPS6 – Tewkesbury Connecting Places Strategy • CPS3 – North Cotswold Connecting Places Strategy This page is intentionally blank Draft Local Transport Plan consultation document 1 This document combines the following separate strategies into one document to aid the consultation process. Overarching Strategy CPS1 - Central Severn Vale Connecting Places Strategy CPS2 - Forest of Dean Connecting Places Strategy CPS3 – North Cotswold Connecting Places Strategy CPS4 – South Cotswold Connecting Places Strategy CPS5 – Stroud Connecting Places Strategy CPS6 – Tewkesbury Connecting Places Strategy This page is intentionally blank Gloucestershire’s Draft Local Transport Plan Overarching 2015-31 Strategy A resilient transport network that enables sustainable economic growth providing door to door travel choices Gloucestershire’s Draft Local Transport Plan - Overarching Strategy Local Transport Plan This strategy acts as guidance for anybody requiring information on how the county council will manage the transport network in Gloucestershire Overarching Strategy Document
    [Show full text]
  • Ricardo Road, Minchinhampton, Stroud, Gloucestershire, GL6 9BY Price £425,000 Ricardo Road, Minchinhampton, Stroud, Gloucestershire, GL6 9BY
    Ricardo Road, Minchinhampton, Stroud, Gloucestershire, GL6 9BY Price £425,000 Ricardo Road, Minchinhampton, Stroud, Gloucestershire, GL6 9BY A well presented and deceptively spacious three double bedroom detached bungalow situated within this popular village setting. Outside the generous front and rear gardens are mainly laid to lawn with well stocked flower and shrub borders. The driveway provides ample parking and access to garage. NO CHAIN The accommodation in brief comprises: Entrance porch, KITCHEN/BREAKFAST ROOM 3.98m (13'1") x 3.02m (9'11") SELLING AGENT hallway, living/dining room, kitchen/breakfast room, three Double glazed door to side, double glazed window to rear and Sawyers Estate Agents bedrooms and shower room. The property offers further side, range of fitted wall and base units complemented with 17 George Street potential giving purchasers the opportunity to put their contrasting work surfaces, stainless steel one and a quarter Stroud own stamp on it. Benefits include double glazing where bowl sink unit with mixer taps, tiled splash backs, breakfast bar, Gloucestershire specified and gas central heating. space for cooker, plumbing for dishwasher, space for GL5 3DP fridge/freezer. Airing cupboard. Wall mounted boiler. Outside the generous front and rear level gardens are 01453 751647 mainly laid to lawn with well stocked mature shrub and tree BEDROOM ONE 4.22m (13'10") x 2.97m (9'9") [email protected] borders. The driveway provides ample parking along with Double glazed window to front, two double glazed windows to www.sawyersestateagents.co.uk access to the garage. No onward chain. side. Radiator. Local Authority BEDROOM TWO 3.48m (11'5") x 2.97m (9'9") Stroud District Council - Band E Double glazed window to rear, built in double wardrobe.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Roads of Britain
    Roman Roads of Britain A Wikipedia Compilation by Michael A. Linton PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 02:32:02 UTC Contents Articles Roman roads in Britain 1 Ackling Dyke 9 Akeman Street 10 Cade's Road 11 Dere Street 13 Devil's Causeway 17 Ermin Street 20 Ermine Street 21 Fen Causeway 23 Fosse Way 24 Icknield Street 27 King Street (Roman road) 33 Military Way (Hadrian's Wall) 36 Peddars Way 37 Portway 39 Pye Road 40 Stane Street (Chichester) 41 Stane Street (Colchester) 46 Stanegate 48 Watling Street 51 Via Devana 56 Wade's Causeway 57 References Article Sources and Contributors 59 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 61 Article Licenses License 63 Roman roads in Britain 1 Roman roads in Britain Roman roads, together with Roman aqueducts and the vast standing Roman army, constituted the three most impressive features of the Roman Empire. In Britain, as in their other provinces, the Romans constructed a comprehensive network of paved trunk roads (i.e. surfaced highways) during their nearly four centuries of occupation (43 - 410 AD). This article focuses on the ca. 2,000 mi (3,200 km) of Roman roads in Britain shown on the Ordnance Survey's Map of Roman Britain.[1] This contains the most accurate and up-to-date layout of certain and probable routes that is readily available to the general public. The pre-Roman Britons used mostly unpaved trackways for their communications, including very ancient ones running along elevated ridges of hills, such as the South Downs Way, now a public long-distance footpath.
    [Show full text]
  • Fosbr Newsletter Number 98 October 2018
    FoSBR Newsletter Number 104 November 2020 (Friends of Suburban Bristol Railways) Another newsletter published during a lockdown... As in the earlier part of this year, the government is advising that people should now stay at home and only make essential journeys, avoiding public transport. During this lockdown, Great Western services have remained unchanged and not reduced - this is welcome. We hope that, as things ease and people start to venture out again, journeys should be relatively low risk - because social distancing remains easy on trains that continue to have low passenger numbers. However, as suspected, the Treasury is now getting anxious about the cost of running largely empty trains and is demanding cuts to services. At the beginning of November, trains only carried 31% of the passengers as at the same time last year and there is concern now that possibly one-fifth of commuters will stay away from rail travel indefinitely. The Times (on 10 November) says "The Department of Transport has told [train] companies to submit plans to make railways more 'financially sustainable' while still providing enough capacity for Covid-safe travel. One rail industry source said that service levels could be reduced to about 80 or 85 percent of pre-pandemic levels". Despite this, we hope that the Government continues to invest in and champion the railway. In the longer term our rail services will need all the support they can get to ensure they don't just survive (in a world that could easily be one of limited funds) but grow - in order to tackle the climate emergency.
    [Show full text]
  • Preston NDP Made Plan May 2021
    PRESTON NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2020-2031 MADE PLAN Prepared by Andrea Pellegram MRTPI, modified by Cotswold District Council May 2021 [Course title] following Independent Examination 1.2. Preston NDP – Made Plan Introduction by Chairman of the Steering Group Neighbourhood Development Plans come out of the Government’s determination to ensure that local communities are closely involved in the decisions which affect them. The Preston Neighbourhood Development Plan has been developed to establish a vision for the village and to help deliver the local community’s aspirations and needs for the plan period 2018 – 2031. Our Neighbourhood Development Plan is a statutory document that is part of the District planning framework and will be used by Cotswold District Council to determine planning applications. Our Plan has been produced by local residents, under the aegis of the Parish Council, using the views of the residents of Preston, with the invaluable assistance of an experienced Planning Consultant. The Steering Group has consulted with and listened to the community and local organisations on a wide range of issues that will influence the well-being, sustainability and long-term preservation of Preston’s rural community. Building on the Design Statement published in 2017, every effort has been made to ensure that the views and policies contained in this document reflect those of the majority of Preston residents. An electronic copy of this Plan and the Evidence Papers supporting it can be found online at www.prestonpc.org.uk As Chair of the Steering Group I would like personally to thank particularly the members of the Group and pay tribute to their work since May 2017 and our Parish Clerk and Planning Consultant for their continued support.
    [Show full text]
  • The Idea of Residence in the Neolithic Cotswolds
    THE IDEA OF RESIDENCE IN THE NEOLITHIC COTSWOLDS Volume 1 Nicola Snashall A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY & PREHISTORY UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD September 2002 This thesis is an investigation of the idea of residence in the British Neolithic carried out at a regional level. The aim is to produce a clearer understanding of ideas and modes of residence as experienced by groups residing in the Cotswolds between the Later Mesolithic and the Early Bronze Age. This is undertaken through the use of lithic assemblages in combination with other sources of monumental and topographical information. The assemblages are analysed in a series of sampling units chosen to reflect the diversity in monumentality and topography within the region. Analysis of the assemblages is undertaken in two stages. The first establishes the validity of using Pitts’ and Jacobi’s (1979) chronometric methodology within the region and goes on to suggest a supplementary method more suited to dealing with lithic material produced within a parsimonious tradition of stone working. The second stage builds upon the chronometric patterning established in the first phase. It uses this patterning in combination with a technological and typological analysis of selected assemblages to establish the residential choices made by communities in different topographic and monumental areas. The analyses of the character of individual assemblages is then used to build an understanding of the residential choices made in different periods within individual monumental and topographical areas. Finally an attempt is made to draw out the contrasts and continuities in residential practices in the region as a whole during different periods.
    [Show full text]
  • Service Number 42/43
    4 | Transport Network Analysis SERVICE NUMBER 42/43 42 3 0 3 6 9 12 km Connecting Cheltenham - Baseline Report 107 4 | Transport Network Analysis SERVICE NUMBER 51 51 3 0 3 6 9 12 km 108 Connecting Cheltenham - Baseline Report 4 | Transport Network Analysis SERVICE NUMBER 93 93 3 0 3 6 9 12 km Connecting Cheltenham - Baseline Report 109 4 | Transport Network Analysis SERVICE NUMBER 94 94 3 0 3 6 9 12 km 110 Connecting Cheltenham - Baseline Report 4 | Transport Network Analysis SERVICE NUMBER 94U 94U 3 0 3 6 9 12 km Connecting Cheltenham - Baseline Report 111 4 | Transport Network Analysis SERVICE NUMBER 97 97 3 0 3 6 9 12 km 112 Connecting Cheltenham - Baseline Report 4 | Transport Network Analysis SERVICE NUMBER 99 99 3 0 3 6 9 12 km Connecting Cheltenham - Baseline Report 113 114 Connecting Cheltenham - Baseline Report 5 | Disruptive Technologies Connecting Cheltenham - Baseline Report 115 5 | Disruptive Technologies DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGIES Transport is undergoing disruption. A variety of technological create more mobility and more car use at the expense of public of far fewer vehicles on the road in some future visions, in the advances are combining to offer both new forms of transportation transport, walking and cycling. In so doing, the commercial shorter term at least, the numbers of vehicles on the road may as well as radically changing the way services are delivered viability of public transport could be further eroded, exacerbating increase. and accessed. These include apps providing dynamic journey accessibility and inclusion for groups who can’t afford (or don’t planning and routeing information so that travellers can plan want to) engage with these new services, and we could end up The strategy should, therefore, try to prioritise shared transit, their journeys ‘on the go’ in response to real time network with more mobility, more congestion and more exclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Lydney Cycling Improvements Full Business Case
    Full Business Case Lydney Cycling Improvements COGL43055613 26/10/2018 Executive Summary This report represents the Final Full Business Case for the Lydney Cycling Improvements Scheme. The scheme proposed is a series of interlinking cycling and pedestrian routes, and the package is considered to be appropriate to achieve the agreed aims and objectives of the project as defined by GFirst LEP. The scheme has been developed with the aim of promoting cycle usage and reducing car journeys within Lydney. The scheme will create a pleasant, safe and accessible network of pathways around Lydney linking together Aylburton, Lydney Town Centre, Railway Station, Dean Academy, and residential developments. It is recognised that the proposal does not address traffic issues in Lydney, as had been previously identified in earlier studies, due to the level of funding now available. However, the scheme does represent a significant investment in the town. By focusing on cycling routes to key destinations, the improvements will provide alternative routes that can be taken by bike, rather than by a motorised vehicle. Lydney and the wider Forest of Dean area can benefit by an overall increase in cycling, both for the local residents and by enhancing the offer for cycling tourism in the area and for longer-distance leisure routes. The Business Case explains the process of identifying the final scheme and through the defined processes demonstrates that the proposal represents high value for money according to the Department for Transport criteria, and therefore a sound and justified spend of public monies. The most significant benefit from the scheme is derived from the increase in predicted cycling trips, and the associated health benefits for the users, with the level of benefits far exceeding the cost of the scheme.
    [Show full text]