Scottish Industrial History Vol 5.1 1982
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
SCOTTISH INDUSTRIAL HISTORY Volume 5.1 1982 )_ /JI) IY1 Scottish Industrial History is produced twice per year and is edited by Dr C W Munn and Mr A Wilson, University of Glasgow, for the Business Archives Council of Scotland, Miss S Clarke, Low Moss Road, Paisley, for the Scottish Society for Industrial Archaeology, and Mr R Millar, Norham Street, Glasgow, for the Scottish Society for the Preservation of Historical Machinery. The typescript for the present issue was prepared by Mr D Maclauchlan, University of Glasgow and the proofs were read by Mr Malcolm Livingstone, University of Glasgow. Front Cover - The Kirkintilloch-buil t puffer Spartan, recently donated to the West of Scotland Boat Museum by the Glenlight Steamship Co. Ltd., in Bowling Basin. Back Cover - One of the two ferries acquired by the Forth and Clyde Canal Society for service on the canal. The other has been taken up to the summit level at Kirkintilloch. Both drawn by John R Hume. S C 0 T T I S H I N D U S T R I A L H I S T 0 R Y vol. 5.1 Contents The Leith Glass Works: 1689-c.1708 Monica Clough 2 An Introduction to the technology of meal milling in Scotland John Shaw 8 Scottish buildings for meat and fish preservation: a preliminary survey Bruce Walker 25 Investment and railways in nineteenth century Scotland Ranald C Michie 45 Society News 54 Local News - Cross Arthurlie Mill, Barrhead Margaret Blackburn and Sylvia Clark 56 Restoration at Pollok G Beveridge 63 Summary list of archive surveys and deposits 69 Book Reviews 80 2 TI!E LEI'lll GLASS WORKS: 1689 - c. 1708 by Monica Clough The history of infant industries in the late seventeenth century in Scotland is only beginning to come to light. One of these forgotten industrial attempts was the Leith Glassworks, which operated for nearly twenty years up to the Act of Union. The documents on which this study is based have come to light amid the mass of family papers belonging to George Mackenzie, Viscount Tarbat and later first Earl of Cromartie (1632-1714). In the late seventeenth century George Mackenzie was one of Scotland's leading magnates and politicians, under James II and VII, William and Mary, and Anne he energetically promoted a number of infant industries through enabling legislation, and by private investment. His brother, Roderick Mackenzie, Lord Prestonhall, was also an active entrepreneur; some of his activities, however, were more suspect, and in one case led the country to disaster when the national investment in the Company Trading to Africa and the Indies died dismally in the swamps of Darien. Prestonhall was the secretary to this company. The problem with the infant industries seems not to have been the technicalities of manufacture, but the difficulties of marketing and transport in a country still regionally self- sufficient and conservative. This can be seen in the case of Nicholas Dupin's paperworks and linen manufactory in which Lord Tarbat was also interested; exports of surplus rough blue paper to Darien were disastrously misplaced. The marketing problem may also have affected the decline of the Leith Glass Works, though at the time blame for its final insolvency was placed on government officials for quartering troops - that heavy burden on public and private life in disordered Scotland in the period under consideration - and on English dumping of cheaper glass ware. Not only were Scottish markets too small and demand to low for manufactured goods, but export from Scotland was impossible in the face of the mercantilist laws of England which enforced English monopolies and carriers, and penalised Scots attempts to compete. A consideration of these points was perhaps more material in the discussion which led to the Union of the Parliaments in 1707 than the strictly political. Economic aspects were certainly much debated at the time. Two copies of a printed proclamation In Favour of 2 Glass Manufactory ~ Leith, dated 8 October 1689, survive. The setting up was proclaimed 'at the Mercat Cross so that none may pretend ignorance', and was by Act of Parliament 'for the better encouragement of glass manufacture', and it expressly prohibited the ' import from any place abroad of any green glass bottles, chymistry and apothecary glasses under payne of confiscation'. Apparently the works quickly got under way, for a few months later the first of several orders on the glass works turns up among the Cromartie papers, addressed to Alex Ai nslie, clerk to the works: 'Alex Ainsl ie, loving friend, deliver to Lord Prestonhall 's ser vant 2 gross of mutchkin bottles and one gross of chappon bottles and this shall be your warrant: your aff. friend Tarbat, Edinburgh 12 April 1690'. It is endorsed 'ffor Alex Ainslie 3 of the Glass works, Leith, April 15 1690 '; and, in another hand, 'Ree. be me James Young servitor to Prestonhall 2 gros muchkyne and on gros chappie botels from Alex Ainslie Conform 24 doz. maskin [mutchkin](l) botels at 2d. pr. doz 02.08 12 doz. chapin [chapkin]Cl) ditto at 3/4d. pr. doz 02.08 To cording for 5 crells [creel baskets] 00.01 £04.05 Scots' (Cromarti e Papers, XV. 152)(2) In October of the same year, 1690, Lord Tarbat sent a consignment of bottles to his Highland base, consigned on one of his ships which brought his annual rental of bere barley south for sale to the brewers of Leith: John Gair, master of the El iza of Leith, gave receipt for having received on board at Leith four hampers containing 'On gross of muskne, twa gross chapkie botles, six pynt botles, Four chirnes of glas s and six gross of corks in good condition for the vse of the Viscount of Tarbat ... to delyvour at Cromartie.' (XVI.64). The use all these bottles was put to can only be guessed at; there are contemporary references scattered throughout the papers to ale-brewing by Lady Tarbat, to the evil effects of too much acquavitty (whisky), and to the importation through London of a hogshead of wine, shipped by Francis Weston in May 1690 ('conforme to customes in tyme of war') which seems the most likely use. The habit of buying claret in bulk and decanting it in one's own cellar was a long- standing one, which persisted in Scotland until the early nineteenth century when every West or East Indiaman leaving the Clyde reckoned on taking a cargo of green glass bottles from Glasgow or Dumbarton, and corks, to sell with the hogsheads of Madeira or Bordeaux bought en route, or the barrels of rum or whisky carried from the distillers of Greenock. In 1695 one of Lord Tarbat's secretari es, James Lindsay, wrote to 'Alex Ainsley Clerk to the Glass works at Leith: My Lord do desire that yo gott him 20 dozns of chapinds and 10 dozns of mut. bottels so soon as possible to be sent here if your work be goeing now lett tham be marked gif it is all [possible? ] Royston, 29 September 1695'. Royston House, now called Caroline Pa r k, was the mansion house then recently built by Lord Tarbat on the outskirts of Edinburgh, near Leith, where he had had carved over the doorway an inscripti on which began 'Gazae Congeste nihili Impensae usui sunt •.• • - 'riches unemployed are of no use, but made to circulate are productive of much good ' , an excellent sentiment for the promoter of so many infant industries, though regrettably his own riches circulated so fast that they began to run out by the end of his life. (1) - mutchkin = 3/4 of an imperial pint, 1/4 Scots pint chapkin = 1 imperial quart pint Scots = 3 imperial pints (2) - All references in Roman figures ar e to the numbered documents in bound volumes in the Cromartie Papers, Castl e Leod, Ross Shire; with thanks to the Earl of Cromartie for his permission to quote from them . 4 There is then a nine year gap in the Cromartie papers, so far as any reference to the Glass works is concerned. Perhaps the households were sufficiently supplied with chapkin and mutchkin bottles. In 1701, however, trouble is marked by two copies of a Petition (printed and in manuscript) (XII.23 and XIX.196) which reads in part as follows, and which marks the serious inroads made by English undercutting, and corrupt Scots customs officials: Petition of Alex. Ainslie for himself and Co-partners in the Glassworks at Leith to the Lords of the Privy Council. whereas by their Lordships' favour to the glassworks declaring same to be a manufactory and have priviledges thereof and further expressed in the Act of 8 October 1689 for better encouragement [they did] strictly prohibit all merchants and other persons to import and bring into the Kingdom from any other place abroad any green bottles Chymestry and apothecary glass under the pain of confiscation... [and] notwithstanding that we make the said glasses to the satisfaction of all that use them, and that now our merchants have in obedience to your Lordships' sett proclamation (and the Acts of Parliament whereon it is founded) given over the import [of] any glass bottles from abroad, The Master of the Glass Manufactures in England on purpose to break our trade send in great quantities of the said glass bottles to undersell and ruine our manufactorie, resolving that by the connivance of the Collector of Customs (as is apparant by the two seald instruments taken vpone ane former act of your Lordships) impouring us to sease on certain quantity of bottles at Montrose herewith produced That soon as they can constrain us to give over they will not only have our trade but the making of the price at their pleasure.