DOCSLIB.ORG

Soviet Union: a Chronology of Events Surrounding the Coup Attempt August 1 - September 15, 1991

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Soviet Union: a Chronology of Events Surrounding the Coup Attempt August 1 - September 15, 1991 91-705 F CRBM<SBRe rt or BH~Ss Soviet Union: A Chronology of Events Surrounding the Coup Attempt August 1 - September 15, 1991 Sergiu Verona Analyst in European Affairs Foreign Affairs and National Defense Division September 27, 1991 CRS fCnrs Sevc - Th Lirr CnrssoaS Reeac SOVIET UNION: A CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS SURROUNDING THE COUP ATTEMPT AUGUST 1 - SEPTEMBER 15, 1991 SUMMARY This chronology covers one of the most important periods in Soviet history, possibly the most significant since the Bolshevik revolution of 1917. Most of the results of the 1917 revolution were repudiated: the existence and the unlimited power of the Communist Party, the Soviet system, the shadow of the KGB, the "socialist system of property," and the total rejection of the free enterprise economic model. The key period was from August 18 to August 21, the days of the attempted reactionary coup. Events included Gorbachev's arrest and isolation, the institution of a new power representing the coalition of the top military, KGB government and Communist Party leaders, the suspension of the media, the attempt to use the diplomatic network to recognize the new regime, and the military rule in Moscow and Leningrad. Equally important were the rapid failure of the coup, as well as the international support for the restoration of the legal power in the U.S.S.R. The changes in Soviet society were not limited to these few days of August. On the contrary, the following period witnessed the most crucial transformation of what is frequently called today the former Soviet Union. Events included the suspension of the Communist Party's activities, the secession of the Soviet republics from central control, and the independence of the Baltic states, Moldavia, and other former Soviet republics. The drastic reduction of the KGB's power and the ouster of many high-ranking anti-democratic Soviet military officers signalled the eclipse of these two long-time instruments of Soviet internal and external power. GENERAL SOURCE NOTE Sources for this chronology include: Facts on File, Keesing's, Radio Free Europe Daily Report, Radio Free Europe/RadioLiberty's Report on the U.S.S.R., Foreign Broadcast Information Service Daily Report for the Soviet Union, the New York Times, the Washington Post, the FinancialTimes, the Economist, and Izvestiya. This chronology is the continuation of previous similar publications: CRS Report 87-551F, Soviet "Restructuring" Under Gorbachev: A Chronology, January 1985-June 1987; CRS Report 89-138F, Glasnost and Perestroika Under Gorbachev: A Chronology, July 1987-December 1988; and CRS Report 89-616F, Soviet Glasnost and Perestroika: A Chronology, January-October 1989. SOVIET UNION: A CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS SURROUNDING THE COUP ATTEMPT AUGUST 1 - SEPTEMBER 15, 1991 08/01/91 -- Referring to the U.S.S.R.-U.S. summit, President Gorbachev outlined the most important gains--"the beginning of the reduction of nuclear arms," a "new qualitative level of the European process," the contribution to "the solution of some regional conflicts," and a major step toward a new type of international economic relations. -- Russian President Boris Yeltsin declared that the R.S.F.S.R. and Kazakhstan would sign the Union treaty on August 20. -- The Committee for Public Education reported U.S.S.R. Defense Minister Dmitri Yazov had submitted an official memorandum to President Gorbachev suggesting that daytime students be drafted into the Army this fall. 08/02/91 --- Aleksandr Yakovlev explained the reason for his resignation as adviser to President Gorbachev. "I am increasingly convinced that our tragedy results from Marxist dogmas". 08/03/91 --- In an article published in Sovetskaya Rossiya, Yegor Ligachev attacked the results ofperestroika, especially the U.S.S.R.'s policy in Eastern Europe under Gorbachev. He attributed the "loss" of Eastern Europe almost entirely to Aleksandr Yakovlev and Eduard Shevardnadze. -- The Democratic Party of Communists of Russia decided to form a party within the Soviet Communist Party. -- Seven Lithuanian officials killed on July 31 were buried in Vilnius. The Russian Television quoted "Shchit," an organization of reformist Soviet military officers, as saying it believed the KGB was responsible for the killings. On August 7, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the KGB issued a joint statement denying responsibility for the murders. 08/04/91 --- It was officially announced in Moscow that President Gorbachev had left for the Crimea for vacation. -Moscow radio network reported increasingly divergent opinions between President Gorbachev and Prime Minister Pavlov and the CRS-2 view that it had been no accident that Pavlov did not accompany Gorbachev to the G-7 meeting in London. -- R.S.F.S.R.'s decree on depoliticization came into force. According to the decree, the activity of Communist Party organizations was banned in state institutions and enterprises. Some reports said the Army was resisting the implementation of the decree. -- Soviet newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda reported that the popularity of military academies has substantially increased this year. There were also reports on the increasing inflow of young people to the MVD internal and airborne troops. 08/05/91 --- Viktor Alksnis said that the "Soyuz" parliamentary group, of which he is a leader, still wanted to see President Gorbachev replaced by a collegial body. -- The chief of the Chinese general staff, Colonel General Chi Haotian, started an official visit at the invitation of General Mikhail Moiseev. 08/06/91 --- Soviet presidential spokesman Vitaly Ignatenko stressed that Mikhail Gorbachev was very healthy. -- In Moscow it was announced that the signing of the Union treaty would occur on August 20 at 11.00 a.m. in the presence of President Gorbachev, Prime Minister Pavlov, and other Soviet officials. -- Vladimir Shcherbakov, U.S.S.R. First Deputy Prime Minister, made public data showing significant increases in unemployment in 1991 due to the conversion of Soviet defense industries. The expectation for 1991 was similar. 08/07/91 --- The memoirs of Valerii Legostaev, a former speechwriter of the late Soviet communist leader Konstantin Chernenko, published by the journal Den, discussed Gorbachev's election as General Secretary of the Soviet Communist Party. Legostaev said that frictions between the military and Gorbachev occurred immediately after the latter's accession to power. -Izvestiya published an article warning against a possible conservative counterattack. The author said that the democrats must think seriously how to protect their positions in the light of a possible upsurge of attacks. -- According to the publication Vzglyad, a top official from Pensa Oblast told R.S.F.S.R. People's Deputy Yurii Didenko that CRS-3 Gorbachev would be overthrown and that the KGB and Army were on the side of the plotters. 08/08/91 --- The revised version of the Soviet Communist Party (CPSU) draft program was published by Pravda. The new version included a critical reference to Bolshevism, and called for united armed forces under a central leadership. -- Soviet air traffic controllers rejected a government proposal as insufficient and planned a strike for the next day. -A delegation of deputies from the hardline "Soyuz" faction in the Supreme Soviet returned from Iraq and called for the restoration of close Soviet-Iraqi ties. -A student strike committee was set up in Moscow to draw public attention to the new draft law, "On General Military Service," which the student believed contained many anti-reform conditions. 08/09/91 --- The Movement for Democratic Reform condemned the expulsion of two leaders of the Democratic Party of Communists of Russia, Aleksandr Rutskoi and Vasilii Lipitsky, from the Soviet Communist Party, which it said "behaves in the old Stalinist way." -- The Ukrainian Prime Minister complained that under the conditions of the Draft Union Treaty, about 45 percent of the Ukraine's industrial potential would remain under centralized management, and that the center wanted to retain control of road, sea, and air transport. He also objected to the proposed retention of a single financial, credit, and insurance policy. -- Moldavian President Mircea Snegur accused Moscow and the Moldavian Communist Party of putting pressure on Moldavia in connection with the Union treaty, and reaffirmed a pro- independence stand. 08/10/91 --- Moscow radio announced that a joint Soviet-Polish Commission had officially confirmed that several thousand Polish army officers were shot by the NKVD (predecessor of the KGB) in Kharkov in April-May 1940 and buried in a nearby forest. 08/11/91 --- Moscow radio cited Kazakh President Nursultan Nazarbaev as saying that Balorussia and Tajikistan would join the R.S.F.S.R., Kazakhstan, and Uzbekistan in signing the Union Treaty on August 20. -- Yeltsin stated at a meeting with the trade unions that the signing of the Union Treaty would mark the end of the institutional CRS-4 power of the U.S.S.R. The task of the center would be restricted to defense, border security and railway transportation. 08/12/91 --- Colonel General Gennadiy Stefanovskiy, Deputy Chief of the Main Political Administration of the U.S.S.R. Armed Forces, denied in an interview with Neues Deutschland the threat of a military coup. He stated, however, that "not all military members accept the speedy steps of rapprochement with the West, the unilateral concessions in disarmament, and the hasty return of the troops to our country." He considered the Army to be the sole guarantor of stability in the Soviet Union. -- The R.S.F.S.R. Communist Party Central Committee and the Communist Party Committee of Leningrad Oblast founded a new newspaper called Narodnaya Pravda. The new publication contained materials critical of Gorbachev, Aleksandr Yakovlev, and Eduard Shevardnadze. 08/13/91 --- U.S.S.R.'s Premier Valentin Pavlov warned of the risk of a power vacuum after the Union Treaty was signed unless the center retained some control over the economy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Title of Thesis: ABSTRACT CLASSIFYING BIAS
    ABSTRACT Title of Thesis: CLASSIFYING BIAS IN LARGE MULTILINGUAL CORPORA VIA CROWDSOURCING AND TOPIC MODELING Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang Thesis Directed By: Dr. David Zajic, Ph.D. Our project extends previous algorithmic approaches to finding bias in large text corpora. We used multilingual topic modeling to examine language-specific bias in the English, Spanish, and Russian versions of Wikipedia. In particular, we placed Spanish articles discussing the Cold War on a Russian-English viewpoint spectrum based on similarity in topic distribution. We then crowdsourced human annotations of Spanish Wikipedia articles for comparison to the topic model. Our hypothesis was that human annotators and topic modeling algorithms would provide correlated results for bias. However, that was not the case. Our annotators indicated that humans were more perceptive of sentiment in article text than topic distribution, which suggests that our classifier provides a different perspective on a text’s bias. CLASSIFYING BIAS IN LARGE MULTILINGUAL CORPORA VIA CROWDSOURCING AND TOPIC MODELING by Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Gemstone Honors Program, University of Maryland, 2018 Advisory Committee: Dr. David Zajic, Chair Dr. Brian Butler Dr. Marine Carpuat Dr. Melanie Kill Dr. Philip Resnik Mr. Ed Summers © Copyright by Team BIASES: Brianna Caljean, Katherine Calvert, Ashley Chang, Elliot Frank, Rosana Garay Jáuregui, Geoffrey Palo, Ryan Rinker, Gareth Weakly, Nicolette Wolfrey, William Zhang 2018 Acknowledgements We would like to express our sincerest gratitude to our mentor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Lukyanov Doctrine: Conceptual Origins of Russia's Hybrid Foreign Policy—The Case of Ukraine
    Saint Louis University Law Journal Volume 64 Number 1 Internationalism and Sovereignty Article 3 (Fall 2019) 4-23-2020 Lukyanov Doctrine: Conceptual Origins of Russia’s Hybrid Foreign Policy—The Case of Ukraine. Igor Gretskiy [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/lj Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Igor Gretskiy, Lukyanov Doctrine: Conceptual Origins of Russia’s Hybrid Foreign Policy—The Case of Ukraine., 64 St. Louis U. L.J. (2020). Available at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/lj/vol64/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Saint Louis University Law Journal by an authorized editor of Scholarship Commons. For more information, please contact Susie Lee. SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW LUKYANOV DOCTRINE: CONCEPTUAL ORIGINS OF RUSSIA’S HYBRID FOREIGN POLICY—THE CASE OF UKRAINE. IGOR GRETSKIY* Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, Kremlin’s assertiveness and unpredictability on the international arena has always provoked enormous attention to its foreign policy tools and tactics. Although there was no shortage of publications on topics related to different aspects of Moscow’s foreign policy varying from non-proliferation of nuclear weapons to soft power diplomacy, Russian studies as a discipline found itself deadlocked within the limited number of old dichotomies, (e.g., West/non-West, authoritarianism/democracy, Europe/non-Europe), initially proposed to understand the logic of Russia’s domestic and foreign policy transformations.1 Furthermore, as the decision- making process in Moscow was getting further from being transparent due to the increasingly centralized character of its political system, the emergence of new theoretical frameworks with greater explanatory power was an even more difficult task.
    [Show full text]
  • July 13, 1990 National Intelligence Daily for Friday, 13 July 1990
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified July 13, 1990 National Intelligence Daily for Friday, 13 July 1990 Citation: “National Intelligence Daily for Friday, 13 July 1990,” July 13, 1990, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, Approved for Release by the Central Intelligence Agency, September 1, 2009, Document #0005301353. Contributed by Mark Kramer. https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/209652 Summary: The CIA’s National Intelligence Daily for Friday, 13 July 1990 describes the latest developments in USSR, Nicaragua, Cambodia, East Germany and Yugoslavia. Original Language: English Contents: Scan of Original Document (\ . ,, . !I ' . ' I I Ill II · . I -, I I . , . -D APPROVED FOR RELEASED DATE: (b )( 1) 09-01-2009 (b)(3) NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE DAILY Friday, l3 Juq 1990 lup §ce1et CPAS NID 90-16lJX I 13 .!u/y 1990 ' . ;, n.,.. - . .. , 0 :· I I I II 1-:J " . - I -, . I Cf · . ·, · . · , . .. ' . ~, )j '' ' ""' ' .. ._ . I LI II 1,:J · · I I I . : - - • 0 ~ • • Contents USSR: Party Congress Developments l Nicaragua: Strike Outcome Favors Sandinistas 3 Cambodia: Paris UN Meeting Faces Difficulty 4 East Germany: Show of Foreign Policy Independence 6 Notes USSR-Germanys: CW Controversy on Eve of Kohl's Visit 9 Yugoslavia: Belgrade Takes Hard Line on Separatists 10 USSR: Ukraine's Politics More Volatile After I vashko 10 In Brief 12 (°P Stm~t ] 13 July 1990 ', • • • .' • ' ' I o • •' . ·, '-' g ,.:.., . ~ . · .1. IC 1_1 . .. - . To~ret USSR Yel'tsin Bolts Party Boris Yel'tsin's decision to leave the Communist Party fits a pattern of dramatic actions going back at least as far as his outburst at the Central Committee plenum in October 1987 that cost him his Politburo seat.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia and Asia: the Emerging Security Agenda
    Russia and Asia The Emerging Security Agenda Stockholm International Peace Research Institute SIPRI is an independent international institute for research into problems of peace and conflict, especially those of arms control and disarmament. It was established in 1966 to commemorate Sweden’s 150 years of unbroken peace. The Institute is financed mainly by the Swedish Parliament. The staff and the Governing Board are international. The Institute also has an Advisory Committee as an international consultative body. The Governing Board is not responsible for the views expressed in the publications of the Institute. Governing Board Professor Daniel Tarschys, Chairman (Sweden) Dr Oscar Arias Sánchez (Costa Rica) Dr Willem F. van Eekelen (Netherlands) Sir Marrack Goulding (United Kingdom) Dr Catherine Kelleher (United States) Dr Lothar Rühl (Germany) Professor Ronald G. Sutherland (Canada) Dr Abdullah Toukan (Jordan) The Director Director Dr Adam Daniel Rotfeld (Poland) Stockholm International Peace Research Institute Signalistg. 9, S-1769 70 Solna, Sweden Cable: SIPRI Telephone: 46 8/655 97 00 Telefax: 46 8/655 97 33 E-mail: [email protected] Internet URL: http://www.sipri.se Russia and Asia The Emerging Security Agenda Edited by Gennady Chufrin OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 1999 OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Athens
    [Show full text]
  • History of Ukrainian Statehood: ХХ- the Beginning of the ХХІ Century
    NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF LIFE AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE OF UKRAINE FACULTY OF THE HUMANITIES AND PEDAGOGY Department of History and Political Sciences N. KRAVCHENKO History of Ukrainian Statehood: ХХ- the beginning of the ХХІ century Textbook for students of English-speaking groups Kyiv 2017 UDК 93/94 (477) BBК: 63.3 (4 Укр) К 77 Recommended for publication by the Academic Council of the National University of Life and Environmental Science of Ukraine (Protocol № 3, on October 25, 2017). Reviewers: Kostylyeva Svitlana Oleksandrivna, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of History of the National Technical University of Ukraine «Kyiv Polytechnic Institute»; Vyhovskyi Mykola Yuriiovych, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor of the Faculty of Historical Education of the National Pedagogical Drahomanov University Вilan Serhii Oleksiiovych, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of History and Political Sciences of the National University of Life and Environmental Science of Ukraine. Аristova Natalia Oleksandrivna, Doctor of Pedagogic Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of English Philology of the National University of Life and Environmental Science of Ukraine. Author: PhD, Associate Professor Nataliia Borysivna Kravchenko К 77 Kravchenko N. B. History of Ukrainian Statehood: ХХ - the beginning of the ХХІ century. Textbook for students of English-speaking groups. / Kravchenko N. B. – Куiv: Еditing and Publishing Division NUBiP of Ukraine, 2017. – 412 р. ISBN 978-617-7396-79-5 The textbook-reference covers the historical development of Ukraine Statehood in the ХХ- at the beginning of the ХХІ century. The composition contains materials for lectures, seminars and self-study. It has general provisions, scientific and reference materials - personalities, chronology, terminology, documents and manual - set of tests, projects and recommended literature.
    [Show full text]
  • ELN Group Statement UNGA 2019
    As world leaders prepare to meet this month at the United Nations in New York, we call on them to take urgent steps to reduce the risks of nuclear confrontation. We join a growing number of international leaders in raising the alarm over new nuclear dangers. Last month we witnessed the end of the landmark US-Russia Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF). Today, there are grave doubts over the future of the only remaining agreement that limits and regulates Washington and Moscow’s strategic nuclear weapons, the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START). And new challenges confront the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty (CTBT). Stability is eroding and risks are rising. North Korea has grown its nuclear weapon stockpile, tests missiles, and continues to feel threatened. The fate of inter-Korean and US-DPRK dialogue remains uncertain. Tensions are flaring between nuclear rivals India and Pakistan. And, following Washington’s unilateral breach and resumed sanctions, Iran may walk away from the nuclear deal that constrains its ability to develop nuclear weapons. Moreover, new military technologies threaten to destabilise global and regional nuclear confrontations. These technologies are rapidly evolving and entirely uncontrolled. The risks of nuclear accident, misjudgement or miscalculation have not been higher since the Cuban Missile Crisis. Complacency should not be an option. It is not only European security at stake. Simply coercing an adversary will not restore stability. Politically unrealistic appeals for transformed behaviour will not build trust. An accelerating arms race makes both trust and safer behaviours harder to achieve. It is possible to negotiate with adversaries without condoning unacceptable behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • The Afghanistan Question and the Reset in US-Russian Relations
    The Afghanistan Question and the Reset in U.S.-Russian Relations Richard J. Krickus J. Richard Relations U.S.-Russian and Resetthe in Question Afghanistan The etortThe LPapers THE AFGHANISTAN QUESTION AND THE RESET IN U.S.-RUSSIAN RELATIONS U.S. ARMY WAR COLLEGE Richard J. Krickus Visit our website for other free publication downloads http://www.StrategicStudiesInstitute.army.mil/ To rate this publication click here. U.S. ARMY WAR COLLEGE Strategic Studies Institute U.S. Army War College, Carlisle, PA The Letort Papers In the early 18th century, James Letort, an explorer and fur trader, was instrumental in opening up the Cumberland Valley to settlement. By 1752, there was a garrison on Letort Creek at what is today Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania. In those days, Carlisle Barracks lay at the western edge of the American colonies. It was a bastion for the protection of settlers and a departure point for further exploration. Today, as was the case over two centuries ago, Carlisle Barracks, as the home of the U.S. Army War College, is a place of transition and transformation. In the same spirit of bold curiosity that compelled the men and women who, like Letort, settled the American West, the Strategic Studies Institute (SSI) presents The Letort Papers. This series allows SSI to publish papers, retrospectives, speeches, or essays of interest to the defense academic community which may not correspond with our mainstream policy-oriented publications. If you think you may have a subject amenable to publication in our Letort Paper series, or if you wish to comment on a particular paper, please contact Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Revanchist Russia? Russian Perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian Sovereignty, 1990-2008
    1 Revanchist Russia? Russian Perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian Sovereignty, 1990-2008 Rasmus Nilsson UCL For the degree of PhD 2 I, Rasmus Nilsson, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 3 Abstract The theme of this thesis concerns post-Soviet Russian foreign policy perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty between 1990 and 2008. In the thesis I argue that Russian perceptions became increasingly revanchist in nature during this period, and that we may distinguish between two different types of revanchism, the consequences of which for Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty are quite different. I argue that all Russian perceptions of international affairs are constituted by perceptions of Russia. Thus, perceptions of Belarusian and Ukrainian sovereignty may be divided into three categories, or paradigms, each of which centres on a specific concept that legitimises the existence of Russia, and determines how Belarus and Ukraine are viewed. The three central concepts are the concepts of Law, Power, and Nation, respectively. In the introduction, I outline these paradigms, both in abstract terms and in relation to Russian foreign policy in general, as well as Russian foreign policy towards Belarus and Ukraine. Subsequently, I present my methodology and my literature review, together with a discussion of the theoretical assumptions, which provide the foundation for my argument. Then, I briefly outline Russian foreign policy making during the period relevant for my thesis, before the four main chapters of my thesis outline in roughly chronological fashion how the relative significance of the three paradigms has changed over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Click Here to Download the PDF File
    FROM SOVIET DICTATORSHIP TO RUSSIAN DERMO-CRATIA: TOWARD A THEORY OF POLITICAL JUSTICE BY YANA GOROKHOVSKAIA, B.A. (HONS) A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Law Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario August 2009 ©2009, Yana Gorokhovskaia Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your We Votre r6f6rence ISBN: 978-0-494-60308-6 Our file Notre r&ference ISBN: 978-0-494-60308-6 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduce, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • AN INTERVIEW with TAIR TAIROV Publisher Suomen Rauhanliitto – Finlands Fredsförbund with Support from Leo Mechelin Foundation April 2020
    40 years since END European Nuclear Disarmament “Detente from below” AN INTERVIEW WITH TAIR TAIROV Publisher Suomen Rauhanliitto – Finlands Fredsförbund With support from Leo Mechelin foundation April 2020 Cover photo of Tairov Timo Mielonen Graphic layout of cover and text Tuomas Nikulin FOLKE SUNDMAN FOREWORD TO THE INTERVIEW WITH PROFESSOR TAIR TAIROV THE EUROPEAN PEACE MOVEMENT AND THE BREAKDOWN OF THE COLD WAR On April 28th, 1980, an appeal for European Nuclear Disarmament was launched at a press conference which took place in the House of Commons in the UK. The main authors were E. P. Thompson, Mary Kaldor, Dan Smith and Ken Coates, but the text was the outcome of broad consultations and discus- sions mainly within the British peace movements. The END was an early response to the new nuclear arms race that accel- erated from the late 1970s onwards and had a special focus ona Europe. That nuclear threat re-activated many old peace movements and organizations, but it also formed the basis for new movements and action groups all over Europe and other parts of the world. The new wave of peace activities was quite het- erogenous politically and organizationally, the common denominator being a clear stance against the deployment of new medium-range missiles in Europe. The home base of END was the UK and the British peace movement, but it rapidly gained ground all over Europe. END was both a political concept and an organization. Organizationally the most visible part of the initiative were the big END Conventions that were organized in a range of European countries, starting in Brussels in 1982 and finishing in Moscow in 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY of UKRAINE and UKRAINIAN CULTURE Scientific and Methodical Complex for Foreign Students
    Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine Flight Academy of National Aviation University IRYNA ROMANKO HISTORY OF UKRAINE AND UKRAINIAN CULTURE Scientific and Methodical Complex for foreign students Part 3 GUIDELINES FOR SELF-STUDY Kropyvnytskyi 2019 ɍȾɄ 94(477):811.111 R e v i e w e r s: Chornyi Olexandr Vasylovych – the Head of the Department of History of Ukraine of Volodymyr Vynnychenko Central Ukrainian State Pedagogical University, Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate professor. Herasymenko Liudmyla Serhiivna – associate professor of the Department of Foreign Languages of Flight Academy of National Aviation University, Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate professor. ɇɚɜɱɚɥɶɧɨɦɟɬɨɞɢɱɧɢɣɤɨɦɩɥɟɤɫɩɿɞɝɨɬɨɜɥɟɧɨɡɝɿɞɧɨɪɨɛɨɱɨʀɩɪɨɝɪɚɦɢɧɚɜɱɚɥɶɧɨʀɞɢɫɰɢɩɥɿɧɢ "ȱɫɬɨɪɿɹ ɍɤɪɚʀɧɢ ɬɚ ɭɤɪɚʀɧɫɶɤɨʀ ɤɭɥɶɬɭɪɢ" ɞɥɹ ɿɧɨɡɟɦɧɢɯ ɫɬɭɞɟɧɬɿɜ, ɡɚɬɜɟɪɞɠɟɧɨʀ ɧɚ ɡɚɫɿɞɚɧɧɿ ɤɚɮɟɞɪɢ ɩɪɨɮɟɫɿɣɧɨʀ ɩɟɞɚɝɨɝɿɤɢɬɚɫɨɰɿɚɥɶɧɨɝɭɦɚɧɿɬɚɪɧɢɯɧɚɭɤ (ɩɪɨɬɨɤɨɥʋ1 ɜɿɞ 31 ɫɟɪɩɧɹ 2018 ɪɨɤɭ) ɬɚɫɯɜɚɥɟɧɨʀɆɟɬɨɞɢɱɧɢɦɢ ɪɚɞɚɦɢɮɚɤɭɥɶɬɟɬɿɜɦɟɧɟɞɠɦɟɧɬɭ, ɥɶɨɬɧɨʀɟɤɫɩɥɭɚɬɚɰɿʀɬɚɨɛɫɥɭɝɨɜɭɜɚɧɧɹɩɨɜɿɬɪɹɧɨɝɨɪɭɯɭ. ɇɚɜɱɚɥɶɧɢɣ ɩɨɫɿɛɧɢɤ ɡɧɚɣɨɦɢɬɶ ɿɧɨɡɟɦɧɢɯ ɫɬɭɞɟɧɬɿɜ ɡ ɿɫɬɨɪɿɽɸ ɍɤɪɚʀɧɢ, ʀʀ ɛɚɝɚɬɨɸ ɤɭɥɶɬɭɪɨɸ, ɨɯɨɩɥɸɽ ɧɚɣɜɚɠɥɢɜɿɲɿɚɫɩɟɤɬɢ ɭɤɪɚʀɧɫɶɤɨʀɞɟɪɠɚɜɧɨɫɬɿ. ɋɜɿɬɭɤɪɚʀɧɫɶɤɢɯɧɚɰɿɨɧɚɥɶɧɢɯɬɪɚɞɢɰɿɣ ɭɧɿɤɚɥɶɧɢɣ. ɋɬɨɥɿɬɬɹɦɢ ɪɨɡɜɢɜɚɥɚɫɹ ɫɢɫɬɟɦɚ ɪɢɬɭɚɥɿɜ ɿ ɜɿɪɭɜɚɧɶ, ɹɤɿ ɧɚ ɫɭɱɚɫɧɨɦɭ ɟɬɚɩɿ ɧɚɛɭɜɚɸɬɶ ɧɨɜɨʀ ɩɨɩɭɥɹɪɧɨɫɬɿ. Ʉɧɢɝɚ ɪɨɡɩɨɜɿɞɚɽ ɩɪɨ ɤɚɥɟɧɞɚɪɧɿ ɫɜɹɬɚ ɜ ɍɤɪɚʀɧɿ: ɞɟɪɠɚɜɧɿ, ɪɟɥɿɝɿɣɧɿ, ɩɪɨɮɟɫɿɣɧɿ, ɧɚɪɨɞɧɿ, ɚ ɬɚɤɨɠ ɪɿɡɧɿ ɩɚɦ ɹɬɧɿ ɞɚɬɢ. ɍ ɩɨɫɿɛɧɢɤɭ ɩɪɟɞɫɬɚɜɥɟɧɿ ɪɿɡɧɨɦɚɧɿɬɧɿ ɞɚɧɿ ɩɪɨ ɮɥɨɪɭ ɿ ɮɚɭɧɭ ɤɥɿɦɚɬɢɱɧɢɯ
    [Show full text]
  • President George H.W. Bush Meetings with Foreigners, 1991
    President George H.W. Bush Meetings with Foreigners, 1991 Date Met with... Country/Organization Meeting Location Occasion January 6, 1991 Secretary General Javier Pérez de Cuéllar United Nations Camp David, Maryland Official Visit January 7, 1991 President of the World Bank Barber B. Conable, Jr. World Bank Washington, D.C. Official Visit January 9, 1991 British Ambassador to the U.S. Antony Acland United Kingdom Washington, D.C. Official Visit January 9, 1991 Admiral Jacques Lanxade France Washington, D.C. Official Visit January 11, 1991 Soviet Ambassador to the U.S. Aleksandr Bessmertnykh U.S.S.R. Washington, D.C. Official Visit January 11, 1991 Soviet Ambassador to the U.S. Aleksandr Bessmertnykh U.S.S.R. Washington, D.C. Official Visit January 14, 1991 Minister of Foreign Affairs Taro Nakayama Japan Washington, D.C. Official Visit January 21, 1991 Senior Minister and Immediate-Past Prime Minister Kaun Yew Lee Singapore Washington, D.C. Official Visit January 23, 1991 President Punsalmaagiin Ochirbat Mongolia Washington, D.C. Official Visit 1 President George H.W. Bush Meetings with Foreigners, 1991 January 23, 1991 President Punsalmaagiin Ochirbat Mongolia Washington, D.C. Working Luncheon Member of Standing Committee of Central Advisory Committee Huang Hua January 23, 1991 China Washington, D.C. Official Visit and Ambassador of the People’s Republic of China to the U.S. Zhu Qizhen January 28, 1991 Minister of Foreign Affairs Aleksandrn Bessmertnykh U.S.S.R. Washington, D.C. Official Visit January 29, 1991 Minister of Foreign Affairs Ahmed Esmat Abd el-Meguid Egypt Washington, D.C. Official Visit January 29, 1991 Minister of Foreign Affairs Hans van de Broek Netherlands Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]