The Molecular and Cellular Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Molecular and Cellular Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident I ISSN 00063509, Biophysics, 2011, Vol. 56, No. 3, pp. 577–583. © Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2011. Original Russian Text © I.I. Pelevina, G.G. Afanas’ev, A.V. Aleshchenko, M.M. Antoshchina,V.Ya. Gotlib, A.A. Konradov, O.V. Kudryashova, E.Yu. Lizunova, A.N. Osipov, N.I. Ryabchenko, A.M. Serebryanyi, 2011, published in Radiatsionnaya Biologiya. Radioekologiya, 2011, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 154–161. RADIOBIOLOGY AND RADIOECOLOGY The Molecular and Cellular Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident I. I. Pelevinaa, G. G. Afanas’eva,†, A. V. Aleshchenkob, M. M. Antoshchinac, V. Ya. Gotliba, A. A. Konradovb,†, O. V. Kudryashovaa, E. Yu. Lizunovaa, A. N. Osipova, N. I. Ryabchenkoc, and A. M. Serebryanyib a Institute of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119991 Russia b Institute of Biochemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 119334 Russia c Medical Radiological Research Center, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Obninsk, 249036 Russia Email: [email protected] Received July 5, 2010 Abstract—In this paper the results of research at 5–10 and 24 years after the Chernobyl accident are summa rized. These results include the investigation of genomic instability, formation of the adaptive response, genome damage, and oxidative status. The studies were performed on cells in culture, mice, children and adults who lived in the contaminated areas, and liquidators of the consequences of the Chernobyl accident. Inhibition of cell proliferative activity, late cell death, and the increase in micronucleus and giant cell fre quency were observed after the exposure of cells in culture in the accident zone followed by their culturing in laboratory conditions. In the progeny of the exposed cells, the effect of enhanced radiosensitivity was detected. Thus, it can be assumed that exposure of parental cells in culture in the area of the accident induced genomic instability that resulted in the development of various abnormalities in progeny cells. At the organ ism level, the Chernobyl zone exposure of mice caused an increase in radiosensitivity; as well, a decrease in the endotheliocyte density in the cerebral cortex and other brain tissues was observed. In the blood lympho cytes of children stimulated by PHA, a more than two times increase in micronucleus cell frequency was detected. A reduced number of individuals with significant adaptive response was found in both the juvenile and adult groups. In all investigated populations, an increased number of individuals with enhanced radi osensitivity were observed in response to lowdose radiation exposure. At 24 years after the accident liquida tors were subjected to examinations, which revealed an increased frequency of cells with micronuclei and chromosometype aberrations in blood lymphocytes, an elevated level of DNA double strand breaks, and a reduced level of reactive oxygen species compared to those of the control group. This means that the genomic instability that was accumulated by the residents of the contaminated regions and liquidators as a result of the accident leads to damage of the genetic apparatus, an increase in radiosensitivity, and hypoxia as late conse quences that all are risk factors and increase the probability of the development of tumor and nontumor dis eases. The development of the abovementioned pathological processes may occur in the distant future. Keywords: blood lymphocyte, liquidators of the Chernobyl accident consequences, genome instability, cell death, genome damage, reactive oxygen species, late consequences DOI: 10.1134/S0006350911030237 The Chernobyl accident opened a new era of radio The effects of low dose radiation differ from that of biology where much attention has been given to stud high dose exposure. According to the classical model ies of the effects of low dose radiation. Experimental of radiation effects, the response of discrete cell targets is very individual and depends on the number of non research on isolated cells, animals, and lymphocytes repaired and incorrectly DNA lesions. In the modern of individuals who were exposed to irradiation, such as concept, response processes may occur at a distance liquidators or the residents of the contaminated zones, that is greater than the cell size; these responses are played an important role in achieving a better under controlled by cellsignaling pathways and a direct hit is standing of postaccident effects. These studies enable not a compulsory for cell damage. As a result of this one to gain knowledge of the early and late conse concept change a new approach to the understanding quences of low dose radiation exposure and possible and assessment of the effects of radiation has arisen. mechanisms of their development that allows solving According to this approach, epigenetic abnormalities the problem of the formation and development of the may be the most important event, as it leads to the consequences of the Chernobyl accident. conversion of normal cells into malignant ones with out direct mutations. In nonexposed cells, changes in † Deceased. the gene expression, DNA repair, chromosome aber 577 578 PELEVINA et al. Table 1. Cell survival (clonogenic ability) in the progeny of main phenomena that lead to a number of various cells exposed in the 10kilometer zone around the Cherno consequences [11]. byl Nuclear Power Plant (0.096 Gy total irradiation dose) In this work, the results of many years of research Number In the Chernobyl (at 5–10 years and 24 years after the Chernobyl acci of generations after Control accident zone dent) are summarized. These are data on the cellular initial exposure and cytogenetic manifestations of genomic instability, 6 0.21 0.14* and the formation of the adaptive response, as well as genome damage (the micronucleus test, metaphase 12 0.17 0.06* analysis of chromosome aberrations, and comet assay 18 0.31 0.25 analysis of the number of DNA breaks). All tests were 21 0.36 0.15* carried out either in areas that were contaminated as a 24 0.36 0.15* result of the Chernobyl accident, such as the Cherno byl Nuclear Power Plant near the nuclear reactor, on * The statistically significant difference between the con χ2 the border with the “Red Forest,” or in the Bryansk trol and irradiated populations of cells ( criterion). region (Klintsy, Vyshkov, and Novozybkov areas) or by using biological samples from liquidators of the Cher nobyl accident [12, 13]. The studies were performed Table 2. The number of giant cells (per 1000 cells analyzed) in the progeny of cells exposed in the 10kilometer zone using mammalian and human cells in culture, the around the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant blood lymphocytes of children and adults, and, at the organism level, those of small laboratory animals that Number Time of exposure – total dose were exposed to the environmental conditions of the of generations Control industrial disaster. after initial 1 days – 0.024 Gy 6 days – 0.144 Gy exposure In cells of a tissue culture that were exposed to irra diation in the accident area for 1, 4, or 6 days, then 46270– cultivated under normal laboratory conditions for 650136*– many cellcycle passages, and then subjected to anal 96280– yses of the consequences of genomic instability, inhi bition of cell proliferative activity in a period of six to 14 60 85 – seven generations after cell culture exposure in the 16 49 62 127* Chernobyl zone was observed, as the control level of 24 63 50 154* cell proliferation was achieved only by the eighth gen eration (control cultures were maintained under simi * The statistically significant difference between the control and irradiated populations of cells (χ2 criterion). lar ecological and other conditions in areas that were not contaminated with radionuclides). The number of cells in the control increased by approximately seven rations, mutations, cell death, and radiationinduced and a half times, whereas after the abovementioned genome instability occur. The genes that regulate radi exposure the value of the growth factor was two times osensitivity are widely studied in epidemiological smaller. It may be assumed that such inhibition of the proliferative activity in the progeny of the exposed research and risk management as markers of the genetic cells is caused by the induction of genomic instability sensitivity of individuals and populations [1, 2]. and, consequently, an elevated level of cell death in the In the last 15 years, the nontargeted effects of low parental culture. This assumption is supported by the dose radiation, such as genomic instability (GI), the fact that the clonogenic ability of cells exposed in the adaptive response (AR), the bystander effect, horme 10kilometer zone around the Chernobyl Nuclear sis, and, at the organism level, the clastogenic effect, Power Plant is lower than that of nontreated cells in have been described [3–10]. the period of 24 generations (Table 1). A very similar situation was observed when the number of giant cells It can be assumed that the problem of the late con was studied as their number increased by more than sequences of the Chernobyl accident is mainly about a two times in the exposed population and does not deep understanding of the effects and mechanisms of decreased in the period of 16–24 generations the actions caused by low dose radiation. It is (Table 2). extremely important that in response to low dose radi Radiosensetivity increase is another important ation GI is induced, which may promote other conse phenomenon that can be classified as a manifestation quences in response to external effects, stress, and of genomic instability; it is detected in the progeny of irradiation in the case of additional load. Therefore, cells exposed in the accident zone. Additional irradia one might suppose that GI induced by low dose radia tion treatment at a 3 Gy dose affects cell survival or the tion in cells of liquidators and residents of the contam clonogenic ability of the progeny of the exposed cells, inated areas of the Chernobyl accident is one of the which becomes significantly lower than that of the BIOPHYSICS Vol.
Recommended publications
  • Demographic, Economic, Geospatial Data for Municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (Excluding the City of Moscow and the Moscow Oblast) in 2010-2016
    Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134 DOI 10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 DATA PAPER Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010-2016 Irina E. Kalabikhina1, Denis N. Mokrensky2, Aleksandr N. Panin3 1 Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia 2 Independent researcher 3 Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia Received 10 December 2019 ♦ Accepted 28 December 2019 ♦ Published 30 December 2019 Citation: Kalabikhina IE, Mokrensky DN, Panin AN (2019) Demographic, economic, geospatial data for munic- ipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010- 2016. Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134. https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 Keywords Data base, demographic, economic, geospatial data JEL Codes: J1, J3, R23, Y10, Y91 I. Brief description The database contains demographic, economic, geospatial data for 452 municipalities of the 16 administrative units of the Central Federal District (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) for 2010–2016 (Appendix, Table 1; Fig. 1). The sources of data are the municipal-level statistics of Rosstat, Google Maps data and calculated indicators. II. Data resources Data package title: Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Cen- tral Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010–2016. Copyright I.E. Kalabikhina, D.N.Mokrensky, A.N.Panin The article is publicly available and in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC-BY 4.0) can be used without limits, distributed and reproduced on any medium, pro- vided that the authors and the source are indicated.
    [Show full text]
  • Thyroid Cancer in Children and Adolescents of Bryansk and Kaluga Regions
    BY0000285 Thyroid Cancer in Children and Adolescents of Bryansk and Kaluga Regions A.F. TSYB, E.M. PARSHKOV, V.V. SHAKHTARIN, V.F. STEPANENKO, V.F. SKVORTSOV, I.V. CHEBOTAREVA MRRC RAMS, Obninsk, Russia Abstract We analyzed 62 cases of thyroid cancer in children and adolescents of Bryansk and Kaluga regions, the most contaminated as a result of the Chernobyl accident. The data on specified radiation situation as well as probable radiation doses to the thyroid are given. It is noted that the development of thyroid cancer depends on the age of children at the time of accident (0-3, 7-9, 12-15 years). They arc the most critical periods for the formation and functioning of the thyroid, in particular, in girls. It is suggested that thyroid cancer develops in children and teenagers residing in areas with higher Cs-137 contamination level at younger age than in those residing in less contaminated regions. It is shown that the minimal latent period in the development of thyroid cancer makes up to 5 years. The results of ESR method on tooth enamel specimen indicate that over postaccident period the sufficient share of children has collected such individual radiation dose which are able to affect on their health stale and development of thyroid pathology. For a long period of time Russia unlike Belarus and Ukraine was considered to be "favourable" by the development of thyroid cancer in children and adolescents after the Chernobyl accident. Such a fact appeared to be a dissonance in the common concept on the possible radiation induction of thyroid tissues to malignancy when received relatively low doses of iodine radionuclide.
    [Show full text]
  • BR IFIC N° 2639 Index/Indice
    BR IFIC N° 2639 Index/Indice International Frequency Information Circular (Terrestrial Services) ITU - Radiocommunication Bureau Circular Internacional de Información sobre Frecuencias (Servicios Terrenales) UIT - Oficina de Radiocomunicaciones Circulaire Internationale d'Information sur les Fréquences (Services de Terre) UIT - Bureau des Radiocommunications Part 1 / Partie 1 / Parte 1 Date/Fecha 10.03.2009 Description of Columns Description des colonnes Descripción de columnas No. Sequential number Numéro séquenciel Número sequencial BR Id. BR identification number Numéro d'identification du BR Número de identificación de la BR Adm Notifying Administration Administration notificatrice Administración notificante 1A [MHz] Assigned frequency [MHz] Fréquence assignée [MHz] Frecuencia asignada [MHz] Name of the location of Nom de l'emplacement de Nombre del emplazamiento de 4A/5A transmitting / receiving station la station d'émission / réception estación transmisora / receptora 4B/5B Geographical area Zone géographique Zona geográfica 4C/5C Geographical coordinates Coordonnées géographiques Coordenadas geográficas 6A Class of station Classe de station Clase de estación Purpose of the notification: Objet de la notification: Propósito de la notificación: Intent ADD-addition MOD-modify ADD-ajouter MOD-modifier ADD-añadir MOD-modificar SUP-suppress W/D-withdraw SUP-supprimer W/D-retirer SUP-suprimir W/D-retirar No. BR Id Adm 1A [MHz] 4A/5A 4B/5B 4C/5C 6A Part Intent 1 109013920 ARG 7156.0000 CASEROS ARG 58W28'29'' 32S27'41'' FX 1 ADD 2 109013877
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected] DATE LOCATION ACTIVITY CHAIN of COMMAND
    221. SICHERUNGS-DIVISION - UNIT HISTORY DATE LOCATION ACTIVITY CHAIN OF COMMAND 1939/02/02 Schweidnitz, Wehrkreis VIII, Activation as 221.ID (3.Welle) by Breslau conversion of 221.LdwD, formation, training 1939/08/26 Krotoszyn, Ostrow Wielkopolski, Operational readiness, movement, C.O.: Gen.Lt. Johann Pflugbeil, 1939/08/26-1942/07/05 Kalisz, Leczyca, Kutno, Modlin, Polish campaign, defensive and Suburdinate to: AOK 8, 1939/08/26-1939/09/10 Lublin offensive operations AK 10, 1939/09/11-1939/10/14 AK 4, 1939/10/14-1939/10/20 1939/10/18 Chelm, Opatow, Radzyn Podlaski, Movement, occupation duty, border AK 32 Hoeh.Kdo., 1939/10/20-1940/04/24 Wlodawa, Sandomierz security, training 1940/01/01 Kielce, Ostrowiec, Skarzysko- Movement, occupation duty, Kamienna, Radon training 1940/04/27 Wehrkreis XVII, Doellersheim Transfer, training OKH, Stellv.Gen.Kdo.- XVII, 1940/04/24-1940/05/31 1940/06/02 Freiburg/i.Br., Haslach, Waldkirch Movement, assembly AK 25, 1940/06/01-1940/06/05 AK 27, 1940/06/06-1940/07/02 1940/06/15 Neuf-Brisach, Colmar, Munster, Invasion of France, offensive La Bresse, Lure engagements, occupation duty 1940/07/05 Gutach/i.Br., Waldkirch Movement, assembly AOK 1, 1940/07/02-1940/07/10 1940/07/09 Breslau, Olesnica, Strehlen Transfer, rehabilitation, training AK 8, 1940/07/10-1941/05/09 (Strzelin), Olawa, Brieg regrouping, quartering 1941/03/15 Breslau, Narew River, Ostroleka, Reorganized as SichD 221, movement, AK 7, 1941/05/10-1941/07/02 Lomza, Bialystok, Brest, Kobrin mopping-up action, security Bfh.rueckw.HGeb Mitte, 1941/07/03-1941/12/13
    [Show full text]
  • Radiological Conditions in the Dnieper River Basin
    RADIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORTS SERIES Radiological Conditions in the Dnieper River Basin Assessment by an international expert team and recommendations for an action plan IAEA SAFETY RELATED PUBLICATIONS IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS Under the terms of Article III of its Statute, the IAEA is authorized to establish or adopt standards of safety for protection of health and minimization of danger to life and property, and to provide for the application of these standards. The publications by means of which the IAEA establishes standards are issued in the IAEA Safety Standards Series. This series covers nuclear safety, radiation safety, transport safety and waste safety, and also general safety (i.e. all these areas of safety). The publication categories in the series are Safety Fundamentals, Safety Requirements and Safety Guides. Safety standards are coded according to their coverage: nuclear safety (NS), radiation safety (RS), transport safety (TS), waste safety (WS) and general safety (GS). Information on the IAEA’s safety standards programme is available at the IAEA Internet site http://www-ns.iaea.org/standards/ The site provides the texts in English of published and draft safety standards. The texts of safety standards issued in Arabic, Chinese, French, Russian and Spanish, the IAEA Safety Glossary and a status report for safety standards under development are also available. For further information, please contact the IAEA at P.O. Box 100, A-1400 Vienna, Austria. All users of IAEA safety standards are invited to inform the IAEA of experience in their use (e.g. as a basis for national regulations, for safety reviews and for training courses) for the purpose of ensuring that they continue to meet users’ needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Present and Future Environmental Impact of the Chernobyl Accident
    XA0102711 IAEA-TECDOC-1240 \ - Present and future environmental impact of the Chernobyl accident Study monitored by an International Advisory Committee under the project management of the Institut de protection et de surete nucleaire (IPSN), France ffl IAEA 32/ 40 August 2001 IAEA SAFETY RELATED PUBLICATIONS IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS Under the terms of Article III of its Statute, the IAEA is authorized to establish standards of safety for protection against ionizing radiation and to provide for the application of these standards to peaceful nuclear activities. The regulatory related publications by means of which the IAEA establishes safety standards and measures are issued in the IAEA Safety Standards Series. This series covers nuclear safety, radiation safety, transport safety and waste safety, and also general safety (that is, of relevance in two or more of the four areas), and the categories within it are Safety Fundamentals, Safety Requirements and Safety Guides. • Safety Fundamentals (silver lettering) present basic objectives, concepts and principles of safety and protection in the development and application of atomic energy for peaceful purposes. • Safety Requirements (red lettering) establish the requirements that must be met to ensure safety. These requirements, which are expressed as 'shall' statements, are governed by the objectives and principles presented in the Safety Fundamentals. • Safety Guides (green lettering) recommend actions, conditions or procedures for meeting safety requirements. Recommendations in Safety Guides are expressed as 'should' statements, with the implication that it is necessary to take the measures recommended or equivalent alternative measures to comply with the requirements. The IAEA's safety standards are not legally binding on Member States but may be adopted by them, at their own discretion, for use in national regulations in respect of their own activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Belarus U . S . S . RR Ussia
    A B C D E D Madona a u g Karsava Loknya ga a Vol v a Varaklani Ghettos in Belarus and Russia Opochka 1939 - 1944 Jekabpils Ludza Toropets Major Ghettos Birzai 1 Other Ghettos Latvia Major Cities Vabalninkas Rzhev Rokiskis 0 60 120 Kupiskis Kamajai Daugavpils Kilometers Nevel Subacius Ilyino Dusetai Rossony Troskunai Uzpaliai Drissa Druja Volyntsy Vyzuonos Salakas Braslaw Soly Miory Dukszty Lithuania Opsa Dzisna Borovukha Trudy Usvyaty Daugieliszki Widze Hermanowicze Velizh Ignalinko Polotsk Yezerishche Vetrino r Szarkowszczyzna Luzki Sirotino Gorodok e Worniany p Voronichi e Sirvintos Nowo Swieciany Ulla Shumilino Yanovichi i Hoduciszki n Glebokie Plissa Ushachi D Lyntupy Vitebsk 2 Kublichi Podbrodzie Dunilowicze Mejszagola Ostrovno N Kiemieliszki Kobylnik Liozno e Mikulino r Swir i Lepel s Michaliszki Zakharino Vilna Parafjanowo Dokszyce Bystrzyca Troki Miadziol Krzywicze Senno Rudnya Studio Gideon Dan,Jerusalem Ostrowiec Dolhinow Smolensk Rudamina Gusino lja Smorgonie Wi Oboltsy Rossasna Oszmiana Smolyany Lyady Krasny Kaluga Orsha Ilja Dubrovno Zaskiewicze Pleshchenitsy Kokhanovo Krewo Zembin Lebiedziew Tolochin Baran Woronow Sloveni U . S . S . R Krasne Radoszkowice Borisov Monastyrshchina Wiszniew Slavnoye Krugloye Kopys Grodek Wolozyn Gorki Tatarsk E as Lida Iwje Shklov Khislavichi te Rakow Smolevichi r Lubavichi n Minsk F Iwieniec Zaslavl Belynichi Mstislavl ron tlin 3 Petrovichi Roslavl e 1 Berezino Mogilev 942 Nowogrodek Rubiezewicze Chausy Korelicze Dukora Cherven Shumyachi O k Jeremicze Krichev a Zdzieciol Krasnopolye Mir Stolpce
    [Show full text]
  • The XIII Army Corps Was Formed in 1936-37 As a Corps and Corps-^Rea Head- Quarters
    XIII. Armeekorps (XI11_ Army / :_; z] 35 The XIII Army Corps was formed In 1936-37 as a corps and corps-^rea head- quarters. It participated in the seizure and occupatlc^ cf Austria, the Sudeten area, and Czechoslovakia and fought in Poland in 1939 and in the West in 1940. In June 1941 it invaded Russia, advancing en the central sector of the eastern front via Baranovichi. Rcgachev, Mogilev, to the Desna River and beyond to Serpukhov near Moscow. Early in 1942 the corps was engaged in offensive and defensive operations in the Ressa-Ugra posi- tions and at Yukhnov and Kirov. In May 1942 it w^s transferred to the Kursk-Orel area on the southern sector of the eastern front and partici- pated in fierce defensive battles for Voronezh. In January 1943 it with- drew from Voronezh, ultimately falling back to the western banks of the Dnieper and engaging in the defense of Kiev. During the 1944 Soviet sum- mer offensive, the corps was destroyed. Late in 1944 the designation XIII Army Corps was given to Corps Felber, which took part in the Ardennes counteroffensive. Item Dates Item No. Roll 1st Frame la, Gefechtsauftrag. A report on the combat mission of the Leibstandarte-SS Adolf Hitler in connection with the seizure of the Gola bridge and the safeguarding of the Prosna bridges during the Polish campaign. Oct 7, 1939 P II 4/b 509 1 la, Anlage z. KTB. Orders and reports relating to XIII Army Corps preparations for the campaign in Poland and the first days of the campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian-Ukrainian Border — Emergence and Sustainability
    Aleksandr I. Igonin1, Vladimir S. Tikunov2 Faculty of Geography, The Lomonosov Moscow State University Russian Federation , 119991 Moscow, Leninskiye Gory, 1 http://www.geogr.msu.ru/ Aleksandr I. Igonin, Vladimir S. Tikunov The Russian-Ukrainian border — emergence and sustainability Abstract. The article analyses the issues of emergence and sustainability of the Russian-Ukrainian border. Methods of analysis of sustainability of administrative and political borders by means of electronic cartographic bases of administrative-territorial division for different years are implemented. A section of border sustainability within the framework of the Geographical Information System (GIS) “Administrative-territorial division of the Russian-Ukrainian borderlands” and a series of maps demonstrating dynamics, sustainability and segmentation of the state border between Russia and Ukraine are developed. A general methodological basis for analysis of sustainability and emergence of borders with the use of geoinformation technologies is elaborated. A historical and geographical analysis of the formation of the Russian-Ukrainian state border is performed. The paper presents classification of the Russian-Ukrainian border into segments, a detailed description of the degree of sustainability and history of emergence of the state border. As a result of estimating classification, various values of the index are obtained, confirming the fact of differentiation of the state border by sustainability and emergence. Four groups of border sections according to the degree of sustainability are allocated, which enables structuring the historical and geographical description of the border and drawing conclusions on the origin, present and future of transboundary processes. Keywords: sustainability of borders, emergency of borders, status of borders, administrative-territorial division, Russia, Ukraine JEL codes: R19, Y91 Introduction The modern state border between Russia and the Ukraine emerged as a result of giving a new status to the administrative border that had existed for decades.
    [Show full text]
  • BR IFIC N° 2628 Index/Indice
    BR IFIC N° 2628 Index/Indice International Frequency Information Circular (Terrestrial Services) ITU - Radiocommunication Bureau Circular Internacional de Información sobre Frecuencias (Servicios Terrenales) UIT - Oficina de Radiocomunicaciones Circulaire Internationale d'Information sur les Fréquences (Services de Terre) UIT - Bureau des Radiocommunications Part 1 / Partie 1 / Parte 1 Date/Fecha 16.09.2008 Description of Columns Description des colonnes Descripción de columnas No. Sequential number Numéro séquenciel Número sequencial BR Id. BR identification number Numéro d'identification du BR Número de identificación de la BR Adm Notifying Administration Administration notificatrice Administración notificante 1A [MHz] Assigned frequency [MHz] Fréquence assignée [MHz] Frecuencia asignada [MHz] Name of the location of Nom de l'emplacement de Nombre del emplazamiento de 4A/5A transmitting / receiving station la station d'émission / réception estación transmisora / receptora 4B/5B Geographical area Zone géographique Zona geográfica 4C/5C Geographical coordinates Coordonnées géographiques Coordenadas geográficas 6A Class of station Classe de station Clase de estación Purpose of the notification: Objet de la notification: Propósito de la notificación: Intent ADD-addition MOD-modify ADD-ajouter MOD-modifier ADD-añadir MOD-modificar SUP-suppress W/D-withdraw SUP-supprimer W/D-retirer SUP-suprimir W/D-retirar No. BR Id Adm 1A [MHz] 4A/5A 4B/5B 4C/5C 6A Part Intent 1 108072614 ARG 173.0750 PICHANAL ARG 64W13'15'' 23S18'41'' FB 1 ADD 2 108073074
    [Show full text]
  • Frontier and Peripherality As Factor of Socio-Economic Development of Russian-Belorussian Border Regions
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Morachevskaya, Kira; Zinovyev, Andrey Conference Paper Frontier and peripherality as factors of socio- economic development of Russian-Belorussian border regions 53rd Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Regional Integration: Europe, the Mediterranean and the World Economy", 27-31 August 2013, Palermo, Italy Provided in Cooperation with: European Regional Science Association (ERSA) Suggested Citation: Morachevskaya, Kira; Zinovyev, Andrey (2013) : Frontier and peripherality as factors of socio-economic development of Russian-Belorussian border regions, 53rd Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Regional Integration: Europe, the Mediterranean and the World Economy", 27-31 August 2013, Palermo, Italy, European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Louvain-la-Neuve This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/123994 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte.
    [Show full text]
  • A LEGACY of the HOLOCAUST in RUSSIA Daron Acemoglu Tarek A
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES SOCIAL STRUCTURE AND DEVELOPMENT: A LEGACY OF THE HOLOCAUST IN RUSSIA Daron Acemoglu Tarek A. Hassan James A. Robinson Working Paper 16083 http://www.nber.org/papers/w16083 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 June 2010 We are particularly grateful to Mark Harrison for his help and many suggestions and Omer Bartov for his detailed comments on an earlier draft. We also thank Josh Angrist, Bob Davies, Esther Duflo, Elhanan Helpman, Amy Finkelstein, Tim Guinnane, Lawrence Katz, David Laibson, Jeffrey Liebman, Sergei Maksudov, Joel Mokyr, Cormac Ó Gráda, Kevin O'Rourke, Leandro Prados de la Escosura, four anonymous referees, and seminar participants at Harvard and CIFAR for useful comments. We also thank Elena Abrosimova, Victoria Baranov, Tatyana Bezuglova, Olga Shurchkov and Alexander Teytelboym for excellent research assistance. Tarek Hassan is grateful for financial support from the William A. Ackman Fund for Holocaust Studies and the Warburg Foundation. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2010 by Daron Acemoglu, Tarek A. Hassan, and James A. Robinson. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Social Structure and Development: A Legacy of the Holocaust in Russia Daron Acemoglu, Tarek A.
    [Show full text]