DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary of Contents Part a Part B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SUMMARY OF CONTENTS PART A PART B List of Maps xxiii Preface xxv SECTION V: Introduction by Christopher R. Browning xxvii REICH COMMISSARIAT OSTLAND Ac know ledg ments xli (REICHSKOMMISSARIAT OSTLAND) 989 Editor’s Introduction xliii Reader’s Guide xlix ESTONIA AND LATVIA REGIONS (GENERALKOMMISSARIAT ESTLAND SECTION I: UND GENERALKOMMISSARIAT LETTLAND) 991 INCORPORATED EASTERN TERRITORIES 1 LITHUANIA REGION (GENERALKOMMISSARIAT LITAUEN) 1031 ZICHENAU REGION (REGIERUNGSBEZIRK ZICHENAU) 3 WEISSRUTHENIEN REGION (GENERALKOMMISSARIAT WARTHEGAU REGION (REICHSGAU WEISSRUTHENIEN) 1159 WARTHELAND) 33 EASTERN UPPER SILESIA REGION SECTION VI: (OST- OBERSCHLESIEN) 131 REICH COMMISSARIAT UKRAINE (REICHSKOMMISSARIAT SECTION II: UKRAINE) 1313 PROTECTORATE OF BOHEMIA AND VOLHYNIA AND PODOLIA REGION MORAVIA (PROTEKTORAT BÖHMEN (GENERALKOMMISSARIAT UND MÄHREN) 177 WOLHYNIEN UND PODOLIEN) 1315 SECTION III: ZHYTOMYR REGION GENERAL GOVERNMENT (GENERALKOMMISSARIAT SHITOMIR) 1509 (GENERALGOUVERNEMENT) 185 KIEV REGION (GENERALKOMMISSARIAT KIEW) 1583 RADOM REGION (DISTRIKT RADOM) 187 NIKOLAEV AND DNEPROPETROVSK WARSAW REGION (DISTRIKT REGIONS (GENERALKOMMISSARIATE WARSCHAU) 357 NIKOLAJEW UND DNJEPROPETROWSK) 1613 KRAKÓW REGION (DISTRIKT KRAKAU) 475 SECTION VII: LUBLIN REGION (DISTRIKT LUBLIN) 603 REGIONS OF THE USSR UNDER GERMAN MILITARY OCCUPATION 1637 EASTERN GALICIA REGION (DISTRIKT GALIZIEN) 743 EASTERN BELORUS SIA REGION 1639 SECTION IV: EASTERN UKRAINE AND CRIMEA BIA ŁYSTOK REGION (DISTRIKT REGION 1755 BIALYSTOK) 855 OCCUPIED RUS SIAN TERRITORY 1781 528-41848_ch00_10P_Vol_B.indd v 12/21/11 4:53 PM VI SUMMARY OF CONTENTS SECTION VIII: GERMAN- OCCUPIED GREECE 1841 List of Abbreviations 1849 List of Contributors 1865 About the Editor 1871 Names Index 1873 Places Index 1917 Organizations and Enterprises Index 1951 528-41848_ch00_10P_Vol_B.indd vi 12/21/11 4:53 PM CONTENTS PART A List of maps xxiii Konin 63 Preface xxv Kowale Pa nskie 65 Introduction by Christopher R. Browning xxvii Ko zminek 66 Ac know ledg ments xlii Kro sniewice 68 Editor’s Introduction xliii Kutno 69 Reader’s Guide xlix Łask 72 SECTION I: Łe czyca 74 INCORPORATED EASTERN Łód z 75 TERRITORIES 1 Lutomiersk 82 Lututów 83 ZICHENAU REGION Osjaków 85 (REGIERUNGSBEZIRK ZICHENAU) 3 Ozorków 86 Ciechanów 10 Pabianice 88 Czerwi nsk nad Wis ła 12 Paj eczno 90 Drobin 13 Pi atek 92 Maków Mazowiecki 15 Piotrków Kujawski 93 Mława 17 Podd ebice 94 Nowe Miasto 19 Praszka 96 Nowy Dwór Mazowiecki 20 Przedecz 97 Płock 22 Radziejów 98 Płonsk 24 Rzgów 99 Sierpc 27 Sanniki 100 Strzegowo 28 Sieradz 101 Wyszogród 29 Słu{ewo 103 Sompolno 104 WARTHEGAU REGION (REICHSGAU Stryków 106 WARTHELAND) 33 Szadek 107 Be łchatów 41 Tuliszków 108 Brze sc Kujawski 43 Turek 109 Brzeziny 44 Uniejów 110 Bugaj 47 Warta 111 Chocz 48 Widawa 113 Ciechocinek 48 Wielu n 114 Dabie nad Nerem 50 Wieruszów 115 Dobra 51 Władys ławów 117 Gabin 52 Włoc ławek 118 Gostynin 54 Zagórów 120 Grabów 56 Zdu nska Wola 121 Grodziec 57 Zelów 124 Izbica Kujawska 59 Zgierz 127 Kalisz 60 Złoczew 128 Ko ło 62 [ychlin 129 528-41848_ch00_10P_Vol_B.indd vii 12/21/11 4:53 PM VIII CONTENTS EASTERN UPPER SILESIA REGION Garbatka- Letnisko 220 (OST- OBERSCHLESIEN) 131 Gielniów 221 Andrychów 139 Głowaczów 223 Bedzin 140 Gniewoszów 224 Bielsko- Bia ła 143 Ił{ a 226 Chrzanów 146 Inow łódz 227 Czelad z 148 Iwaniska 228 Dabrowa Górnicza 149 Janowiec nad Wis ła 230 Jaworzno 152 Jedli nsk 231 Kłobuck 153 Jedlnia Ko scielna 233 Modrzejów 155 Jedrzejów 234 Olkusz 157 Kamie nsk 236 Sławków 160 Kielce 237 Sosnowiec 162 Klimontów 240 Strzemieszyce 166 Klwów 241 Sucha 167 Koluszki 242 Szczakowa 169 Koniecpol 244 Trzebinia 170 Ko nskie 245 Wadowice 172 Koprzywnica 247 Zawiercie 174 Kozienice 249 Kunów 251 SECTION II: Łagów 252 PROTECTORATE OF BOHEMIA Lipsko 254 AND MORAVIA (PROTEKTORAT Magnuszew 255 BÖHMEN UND MÄHREN) 177 Ma łogoszcz 256 Terezín 179 Mariampol 257 Mniszew 258 SECTION III: Mstów 259 GENERAL GOVERNMENT Nowe Miasto nad Pilic a 260 (GENERALGOUVERNEMENT) 185 Nowy Korczyn 261 Odrzywó ł 263 RADOM REGION (DISTRIKT RADOM) 187 Opatów 264 Bedków 195 Opoczno 266 Bia łaczów 195 Osiek 268 Bia ła Rawska 197 Ostrowiec Swi etokrzyski 269 Bia łobrzegi 199 O{arów 271 Bli {yn 200 Pacanów 273 Bodzentyn 202 Parady { 275 Bogoria 203 Pi nczów 276 Busko- Zdrój (Busko) 205 Pionki 278 Ch eciny 207 Piotrków Trybunalski 279 Chmielnik 209 Po łaniec 283 Ciepielów 211 Przedbórz 284 Cmielów 213 Przyg łów and Włodzimierzów 286 Cz estochowa 214 Przysucha 287 Denków 217 Radom 289 Drzewica 218 Radomsko 293 Firlej 220 Radoszyce 295 528-41848_ch00_10P_Vol_B.indd viii 12/21/11 4:53 PM CONTENTS IX Raków 297 Grójec 376 Rawa Mazowiecka 298 Jadów 379 Ryczywó ł 300 Jeziorna 380 Sandomierz 301 Je {ów 381 Sedziszów 303 Ka łuszyn 382 Sieciechów 305 Karczew 385 Sienno 305 Kiernozia 386 Skaryszew 307 Ko łbiel 387 Skar {ysko-Kamienna 308 Kosów Lacki 389 Skórkowice 311 Łaskarzew 392 Skrzynno 312 Latowicz 393 Słupia Nowa 313 Legionowo 394 Sobków 315 Łochów 396 Solec nad Wis ła 315 Łomianki 399 Starachowice- Wierzbnik 317 Łosice 400 Staszów 318 Łowicz 402 Stopnica 321 Łyszkowice 404 Stromiec 323 Mi łosna 405 Suchedniów 324 Mi nsk Mazowiecki 406 Sulejów 325 Mogielnica 408 Szczekociny 327 Mordy 410 Szyd łów 329 Mrozy 412 Szyd łowiec 330 Okuniew 413 Tar łów 333 Otwock 414 Tomaszów Mazowiecki 335 Parysów 418 Ujazd 338 Piaseczno 419 Wierzbica 339 Pruszków 421 Wi slica 340 Pustelnik 422 Włoszczowa 342 Radzymin 423 Wodzis ław 344 Rembertów 425 Wolanów 346 Sarnaki 426 Wolbórz 347 Siedlce 428 Wy smierzyce 348 Siennica 432 [arki 348 Skierniewice 434 [arnów 350 Sobienie Jeziory 436 Zawichost 352 Sobolew 438 Zwole n 354 Sochaczew 440 Soko łów Podlaski 442 WARSAW REGION (DISTRIKT Stanis ławów 446 WARSCHAU) 357 Sterdy n 446 Błe dów 364 Stoczek Łukowski 448 Błonie 364 Stoczek Wegrowski 449 Bolimów 366 Tarczyn 451 Dobre 367 Tłuszcz 452 Falenica 368 Warka 454 Głowno 370 Warsaw 456 Góra Kalwaria 373 Wawer 460 Grodzisk Mazowiecki 375 Wegrów 462 528-41848_ch00_10P_Vol_B.indd ix 12/21/11 4:53 PM X CONTENTS Włochy 465 Proszowice 552 Wo łomin 467 Pruchnik 554 [elechów 469 Przemy sl 555 [yrardów 471 Przeworsk 558 Rabka 559 KRAKÓW REGION (DISTRIKT KRAKAU) 475 Radomy sl Wielki 561 Baranów Sandomierski 482 Ropczyce 563 Biecz 483 Rymanów 564 Bircza 484 Rzepiennik Strzy {ewski 565 Bła{owa 485 Rzeszów 567 Bobowa 486 Sanok 569 Bochnia 488 Sedziszów Ma łopolski 571 Brzesko 491 Sieniawa 572 Brzostek 492 Skawina 574 Brzozów 493 Słomniki 576 Czudec 495 Soko łów Ma łopolski 577 Dabrowa Tarnowska 496 Stary S acz 579 Debica 498 Strzy {ów 580 Dobromil 500 Tarnobrzeg 582 Dukla 501 Tarnów 584 Dzia łoszyce 503 Tuchów 587 Frysztak 505 Tyczyn 588 Głogów Ma łopolski 506 Ustrzyki Dolne 590 Gorlice 508 Wieliczka 591 Grybów 510 Wielopole Skrzy nskie 594 Jasienica Rosielna 512 Wolbrom 595 Jas ło 513 [abno 596 Jawornik Polski 515 Zakliczyn 598 Jedlicze 517 [migród Nowy 599 Jod łowa 518 Kalwaria Zebrzydowska 519 LUBLIN REGION (DISTRIKT LUBLIN) 603 Ka nczuga 521 Baranów nad Wieprzem 611 Ko łaczyce 522 Be ł{ yce 612 Kolbuszowa 523 Bia ła Podlaska 615 Korczyna 525 Bi łgoraj 619 Kraków 527 Bychawa 621 Krosno 531 Che łm 623 Łancut 533 Chodel 626 Lesko 535 Cieszanów 628 Le {ajsk 537 Dubienka 630 Limanowa 538 Grabowiec 632 Miechów 540 Hrubieszów 634 Niebylec 542 Irena (D eblin- Irena) 636 Nowy S acz 543 Izbica (nad Wieprzem) 639 Nowy Targ 546 Janów Podlaski 643 Ołpiny 548 Kazimierz Dolny 645 Pilica 548 Kock 647 Pilzno 550 Komarów 650 528-41848_ch00_10P_Vol_B.indd x 12/21/11 4:53 PM CONTENTS XI Komarówka Podlaska 652 Chodorów 769 Ko nskowola 654 Czortków 770 Konstantynów 657 Dolina 773 Kra snik 659 Drohobycz 774 Krasnystaw 662 Gródek Jagiello nski 777 Kurów 665 Gwo zdziec 779 Łe czna 667 Horodenka 780 Łomazy 670 Janów Lwowski 781 Lubartów 672 Jaryczów Nowy 783 Lublin 675 Jaworów 784 Łuków 678 Jezierzany 786 Markuszów 682 Ka łusz 788 Mi edzyrzec Podlaski 684 Kamionka Strumi łowa 789 Opole 688 Ko łomyja 790 Ostrów 691 Komarno 793 Parczew 693 Kopyczy nce 795 Piaski Luterskie 696 Kosów 797 Pu ławy 699 Kozowa 798 Radzy n Podlaski 701 Lubaczów 800 Rejowiec 703 Lwów 802 Rossosz 706 Miko łajów 805 Ryki 708 Mikuli nce 806 Sławatycze 710 Mo sciska 807 Szczebrzeszyn 713 Mosty Wielkie 808 Tarnogród 715 Nadwórna 810 Tomaszów Lubelski 718 Narajów 812 Tyszowce 720 Podhajce 813 Uchanie 722 Przemy slany 815 Urz edów 723 Radziechów 817 Wawolnica 726 Rawa Ruska 818 Wisznice 728 Rohatyn 821 Włodawa 730 Rudki 823 Zaklików 733 Sambor 824 Zamo sc 735 Ska łat 826 Zwierzyniec 739 Sniaty n 828 Sokal 829 EASTERN GALICIA REGION Stanis ławów 831 (DISTRIKT GALIZIEN) 743 Stryj 834 Bóbrka 750 Tarnopol 836 Bolechów 751 Tłumacz 839 Borszczów 753 Tłuste 841 Borys ław 755 Trembowla 843 Brody 757 Ty smienica 845 Brze {any 759 Zbara { 846 Buczacz 761 Zborów 848 Bukaczowce 765 Złoczów 849 Bursztyn 766 [ółkiew 852 Busk 768 [urawno 853 528-41848_ch00_10P_Vol_B.indd xi 12/21/11 4:53 PM XII CONTENTS Ró {ana 946 SECTION IV: Siemiatycze 949 BIA LYSTOK REGION (DISTRIKT Skidel 952 BIALYSTOK) 855 Sniadowo 953 Augustów 864 Sokó łka 955 Bia łystok 866 Soko ły 957 Bielsk Podlaski 871 Sopo ckinie 959 Bo cki 873 Stawiski 961 Bra nsk 874 Suchowola 963 Ciechanowiec 876 Swis łocz 966 Czy {ewo 877 Szczuczyn 968 Dabrowa Bia łostocka 880 Trzcianne 970 Drohiczyn 881 Wasilków 972 Druskieniki 883 Wo łkowysk 974 Goni adz 885 Wo łpa 976 Grajewo 887 Wysokie Litewskie 978 Gródek Bia łostocki 889 Wysokie Mazowieckie 980 Grodno 890 Zab łudów 981 Grodzisk 893 Zambrów 984 Indura 894 Zelwa 986 Janów Sokólski 896 Jasionówka 897 PART B Jedwabne 899 SECTION V: Jeziory 902 REICH COMMISSARIAT OSTLAND Kamieniec Litewski 904 (REICHSKOMMISSARIAT
Recommended publications
  • Lithuanian Synagogues: from the First Descriptions to Systematic Research

    Lithuanian Synagogues: from the First Descriptions to Systematic Research

    arts Article Lithuanian Synagogues: From the First Descriptions to Systematic Research Vilma Gradinskaite Independent scholar, 05224 Vilnius, Lithuania; [email protected] Received: 4 March 2020; Accepted: 15 May 2020; Published: 21 May 2020 Abstract: The article presents an analysis of the development stages of synagogue research methodology in Lithuania during the four major historical periods of the country—Lithuania in the Russian Empire (1795–1918), Vilnius Region in the interwar period and the independent Republic of Lithuania (1918–1940), the Soviet period (1940–1990), and the independent Republic of Lithuania restored in 1990. Each chapter of the article deals with the issues of synagogue research, heritage conservation and management, while the part about the restored independent Republic of Lithuania and modern days includes topical issues related to synagogue restoration, commemoration and putting them into operation. The study uses two different sources: archival materials and publications. Written sources and publications are reviewed in chronological order and start from the end of the 18th century. The study employs several research methods—the historical descriptive method, the comparative method and the analysis method. Keywords: Lithuania; synagogues; conservation; restoration; renovation; rebuilding; management; commemoration 1. Introduction The article presents several fields of study: (1) a review of the first descriptions of synagogues in Lithuania; (2) an analysis of the development stages of synagogue research methodology in Lithuania; and (3) a brief reference to synagogue restoration, renovation, rebuilding, commemoration and putting into operation—topics which are currently particularly live in Lithuania today. It is not possible to understand the existing trends in synagogue research in Lithuania without considering the country’s past—the times of the Russian Empire, the interwar period and the Soviet period.
  • Youth Policies in Latvia

    Youth Policies in Latvia

    Youth Wiki national description Youth policies in Latvia 2019 The Youth Wiki is Europe's online encyclopaedia in the area of national youth policies. The platform is a comprehensive database of national structures, policies and actions supporting young people. For the updated version of this national description, please visit https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/en/youthwiki 1 Youth 2 Youth policies in Latvia – 2019 Youth Wiki Latvia ................................................................................................................. 7 1. Youth Policy Governance................................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Target population of youth policy ............................................................................................. 9 1.2 National youth law .................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 National youth strategy ........................................................................................................... 11 1.4 Youth policy decision-making .................................................................................................. 12 1.5 Cross-sectoral approach with other ministries ....................................................................... 13 1.6 Evidence-based youth policy ................................................................................................... 14 1.7 Funding youth policy ..............................................................................................................
  • Health Systems in Transition

    Health Systems in Transition

    61575 Latvia HiT_2_WEB.pdf 1 03/03/2020 09:55 Vol. 21 No. 4 2019 Vol. Health Systems in Transition Vol. 21 No. 4 2019 Health Systems in Transition: in Transition: Health Systems C M Y CM MY CY CMY K Latvia Latvia Health system review Daiga Behmane Alina Dudele Anita Villerusa Janis Misins The Observatory is a partnership, hosted by WHO/Europe, which includes other international organizations (the European Commission, the World Bank); national and regional governments (Austria, Belgium, Finland, Kristine Klavina Ireland, Norway, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the Veneto Region of Italy); other health system organizations (the French National Union of Health Insurance Funds (UNCAM), the Dzintars Mozgis Health Foundation); and academia (the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) and the Giada Scarpetti London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM)). The Observatory has a secretariat in Brussels and it has hubs in London at LSE and LSHTM) and at the Berlin University of Technology. HiTs are in-depth profiles of health systems and policies, produced using a standardized approach that allows comparison across countries. They provide facts, figures and analysis and highlight reform initiatives in progress. Print ISSN 1817-6119 Web ISSN 1817-6127 61575 Latvia HiT_2_WEB.pdf 2 03/03/2020 09:55 Giada Scarpetti (Editor), and Ewout van Ginneken (Series editor) were responsible for this HiT Editorial Board Series editors Reinhard Busse, Berlin University of Technology, Germany Josep Figueras, European
  • Social and Economic Space Compression in Border Areas: the Case of the Northwestern Federal District Romanova, E.; Vinogradova, O.; Frizina, I

    Social and Economic Space Compression in Border Areas: the Case of the Northwestern Federal District Romanova, E.; Vinogradova, O.; Frizina, I

    www.ssoar.info Social and economic space compression in border areas: the case of the Northwestern Federal District Romanova, E.; Vinogradova, O.; Frizina, I. Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Romanova, E., Vinogradova, O., & Frizina, I. (2015). Social and economic space compression in border areas: the case of the Northwestern Federal District. Baltic Region, 3, 28-46. https://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2015-3-3 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Free Digital Peer Publishing Licence This document is made available under a Free Digital Peer zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den DiPP-Lizenzen Publishing Licence. For more Information see: finden Sie hier: http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ Diese Version ist zitierbar unter / This version is citable under: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-51391-6 Economic and geographical development of the Russian Northwest ECONOMIC AND GEOGRAPHICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN NORTHWEST The so-called “compression” of social SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC and economic space has been the subject of SPACE COMPRESSION quite a few studies in the past decades. There are two principle types of compres- IN BORDER AREAS: sion: communicative, that is, associated THE CASE with the development of transport and in- OF THE NORTHWESTERN formation systems, and physical, mani- FEDERAL DISTRICT fested in the rapid decrease of the number of new territories to explore. While physi- cal and communicative compression are in- terrelated, they have different spatial ex- * pressions depending on geographical con- E.
  • Lithuanian Jews and the Holocaust

    Lithuanian Jews and the Holocaust

    Ezra’s Archives | 77 Strategies of Survival: Lithuanian Jews and the Holocaust Taly Matiteyahu On the eve of World War II, Lithuanian Jewry numbered approximately 220,000. In June 1941, the war between Germany and the Soviet Union began. Within days, Germany had occupied the entirety of Lithuania. By the end of 1941, only about 43,500 Lithuanian Jews (19.7 percent of the prewar population) remained alive, the majority of whom were kept in four ghettos (Vilnius, Kaunas, Siauliai, Svencionys). Of these 43,500 Jews, approximately 13,000 survived the war. Ultimately, it is estimated that 94 percent of Lithuanian Jewry died during the Holocaust, a percentage higher than in any other occupied Eastern European country.1 Stories of Lithuanian towns and the manner in which Lithuanian Jews responded to the genocide have been overlooked as the perpetrator- focused version of history examines only the consequences of the Holocaust. Through a study utilizing both historical analysis and testimonial information, I seek to reconstruct the histories of Lithuanian Jewish communities of smaller towns to further understand the survival strategies of their inhabitants. I examined a variety of sources, ranging from scholarly studies to government-issued pamphlets, written testimonies and video testimonials. My project centers on a collection of 1 Population estimates for Lithuanian Jews range from 200,000 to 250,000, percentages of those killed during Nazi occupation range from 90 percent to 95 percent, and approximations of the number of survivors range from 8,000 to 20,000. Here I use estimates provided by Dov Levin, a prominent international scholar of Eastern European Jewish history, in the Introduction to Preserving Our Litvak Heritage: A History of 31 Jewish Communities in Lithuania.
  • Result Sheet

    Result Sheet

    Sun and Wind ELRII-473 outputs and results Energy and robotics Outputs hobby-group Local heating and electricity supply systems are modernised in 5 public buildings in Estonia and Pskov Region, Russia Obinitsa village center and Rõuge municipality house energy systems was renoveted with ground heat pumps integrated with solar PV panels Street lighting systems installed in Rõuge (Estonia) and in Tyamsha (Russia) Lightening system installed in Rõuge, Estonia Trainings and capacity building seminars for energy experts and municipality employees organised. Networking of energy experts and local authorities and public representatives is established Secondary school in Boroussy village, Russia equipped with solar panels, which provide hot water for the school 1 Energy Class modernised in Rõuge School by New biomass boilers in Gavry (Pytalovo), Russia installing the smart board and purchasing new equipment for energy measuring. Also weekly energetics-robotics hobby group was regularly attended by students in Rõuge Energy day on Energy Saving Technologies and Renewable Energy Systems (RES) with participation of Russian and Estonian students was held A number of showcases of using solar and wind Solar Panel installed in Boroussy village, Russia power, biofuel and ground heat as possible energy resources were demonstrared Various seminars and study tours on renewable energy and energy efficiency were organised for a wide range of participants RESULTS Increase of knowledge and awareness of local authorities and the community, especially youth on
  • ZRBG – Ghetto-Liste (Stand: 01.08.2014) Sofern Eine Beschäftigung I

    ZRBG – Ghetto-Liste (Stand: 01.08.2014) Sofern Eine Beschäftigung I

    ZRBG – Ghetto-Liste (Stand: 01.08.2014) Sofern eine Beschäftigung i. S. d. ZRBG schon vor dem angegebenen Eröffnungszeitpunkt glaubhaft gemacht ist, kann für die folgenden Gebiete auf den Beginn der Ghettoisierung nach Verordnungslage abgestellt werden: - Generalgouvernement (ohne Galizien): 01.01.1940 - Galizien: 06.09.1941 - Bialystok: 02.08.1941 - Reichskommissariat Ostland (Weißrussland/Weißruthenien): 02.08.1941 - Reichskommissariat Ukraine (Wolhynien/Shitomir): 05.09.1941 Eine Vorlage an die Untergruppe ZRBG ist in diesen Fällen nicht erforderlich. Datum der Nr. Ort: Gebiet: Eröffnung: Liquidierung: Deportationen: Bemerkungen: Quelle: Ergänzung Abaujszanto, 5613 Ungarn, Encyclopedia of Jewish Life, Braham: Abaújszántó [Hun] 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Kassa, Auschwitz 27.04.2010 (5010) Operationszone I Enciklopédiája (Szántó) Reichskommissariat Aboltsy [Bel] Ostland (1941-1944), (Oboltsy [Rus], 5614 Generalbezirk 14.08.1941 04.06.1942 Encyclopedia of Jewish Life, 2001 24.03.2009 Oboltzi [Yid], Weißruthenien, heute Obolce [Pol]) Gebiet Vitebsk Abony [Hun] (Abon, Ungarn, 5443 Nagyabony, 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Encyclopedia of Jewish Life 2001 11.11.2009 Operationszone IV Szolnokabony) Ungarn, Szeged, 3500 Ada 16.04.1944 13.07.1944 Braham: Enciklopédiája 09.11.2009 Operationszone IV Auschwitz Generalgouvernement, 3501 Adamow Distrikt Lublin (1939- 01.01.1940 20.12.1942 Kossoy, Encyclopedia of Jewish Life 09.11.2009 1944) Reichskommissariat Aizpute 3502 Ostland (1941-1944), 02.08.1941 27.10.1941 USHMM 02.2008 09.11.2009 (Hosenpoth) Generalbezirk
  • (COMUS) REFERENCE PLAN Mscislaŭ, Belarus

    (COMUS) REFERENCE PLAN Mscislaŭ, Belarus

    Community-Led Urban Strategies in Historical Cities (COMUS) REFERENCE PLAN Mscislaŭ, Belarus 2 CONTENTS FOREWORD THE PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNIT LOCAL STAKEHOLDER GROUP ANALYSES SHARED VISION AND OBJECTIVES ACTIONS 3 Abbreviations used in the document COMUS Community-Led Urban Strategies in Historical Cities EU European Union CoE Council of Europe NSG National Stakeholder Group LSG Local Stakeholder Group PIU Project Implementation Unit 4 FOREWORD In 2015, Belarus officially joined the Community-led Urban Strategies in Historic Towns (COMUS) which is a European Union and Council of Europe Joint Programme, part of the EU Eastern Partnership Culture Programme. Project activities began on 1 January 2015 in partnership with the Organization of World Heritage Cities (Regional secretariat, Regensburg, Germany) and Armenia, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine. COMUS is a process designed to explore and test innovative planning models which respond to the practical problems in small- and medium-sized historic towns. It continues and develops a former project, titled ‘Pilot Project on Rehabilitation of Historic Towns’. The planning models proposed as part of the COMUS process will develop five specific issues opening up new opportunities for connecting pilot towns with European trends and requirements which include the better integration of heritage protection into urban (and regional) economic development policies and mainstreaming towards other sectorial policies (planning, tourism, environment): a. Raising the importance of heritage, particularly as a potential local resource for reinvestment and economic activity in towns; b. Fostering an integrated approach by setting up synergies between all levels of authorities in order to share responsibilities and combine their capacities in implementing common heritage-led urban projects; c.
  • Demographic, Economic, Geospatial Data for Municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (Excluding the City of Moscow and the Moscow Oblast) in 2010-2016

    Demographic, Economic, Geospatial Data for Municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (Excluding the City of Moscow and the Moscow Oblast) in 2010-2016

    Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134 DOI 10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 DATA PAPER Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010-2016 Irina E. Kalabikhina1, Denis N. Mokrensky2, Aleksandr N. Panin3 1 Faculty of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia 2 Independent researcher 3 Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, 119991, Russia Received 10 December 2019 ♦ Accepted 28 December 2019 ♦ Published 30 December 2019 Citation: Kalabikhina IE, Mokrensky DN, Panin AN (2019) Demographic, economic, geospatial data for munic- ipalities of the Central Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010- 2016. Population and Economics 3(4): 121–134. https://doi.org/10.3897/popecon.3.e39152 Keywords Data base, demographic, economic, geospatial data JEL Codes: J1, J3, R23, Y10, Y91 I. Brief description The database contains demographic, economic, geospatial data for 452 municipalities of the 16 administrative units of the Central Federal District (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) for 2010–2016 (Appendix, Table 1; Fig. 1). The sources of data are the municipal-level statistics of Rosstat, Google Maps data and calculated indicators. II. Data resources Data package title: Demographic, economic, geospatial data for municipalities of the Cen- tral Federal District in Russia (excluding the city of Moscow and the Moscow oblast) in 2010–2016. Copyright I.E. Kalabikhina, D.N.Mokrensky, A.N.Panin The article is publicly available and in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC-BY 4.0) can be used without limits, distributed and reproduced on any medium, pro- vided that the authors and the source are indicated.
  • Gradients of Latvian Magnetic Anomalies

    Gradients of Latvian Magnetic Anomalies

    Scientific Journal of Riga Technical University Sustainable Spatial Development 2011 __________________________________________________________________________________________________ Volume 2 Gradients of Latvian Magnetic Anomalies Vladimir Vertennikov, Riga Technical University Abstract. This article discusses one of the most important and vertical gradients. It is possible to determine those geophysical factors, which produces an impact on the gradients by calculations or measurements using special demographic processes and reflects the nature of variability in instruments – magnetic gradiometers. Instrumented gradient the anomalous magnetic field intensity in space. The article characterises the horizontal magnetic gradients, which vary measurements are predominantly utilised in local areas during within the wide range: from 10 to 2400 nT/km. It distinguishes prospecting and exploration for minerals. In regional magnetic scale and magnetic gradient areas. The article gives an investigations, to which concrete operations associated with ecodemographic evaluation of the territory of Latvia by the investigating the impact of geophysical factors on gradience of the anomalous magnetic field. demographic processes belong, horizontal gradients are the main factor; they are determined by calculations. Keywords: horizontal magnetic gradient, magnetic scale, magnetic gradient area, ecodemographic evaluation of territory by magnetic gradience. CHARACTERISATION OF HORIZONTAL MAGNETIC GRADIENTS The magnetic field is represented in the Latvian territory by a complex set of anomalies with different signs, intensity, size The gradient is an important parameter of anomalous and morphology. The transitions from one anomaly to another magnetic field. The discussion deals with the spatial intensity are expressed through changes in the field intensity and are variations. The thing is that the intensity of the anomalous either gradual, occurring step-by-step, or abrupt.
  • Cretaceous Basin Evolution in the Lublin Area Along the Teisseyre-Tornquist Zone (Se Poland)

    Cretaceous Basin Evolution in the Lublin Area Along the Teisseyre-Tornquist Zone (Se Poland)

    Annales Societatis Geologorum Poloniae (2001), vol. 71: 1-20. CRETACEOUS BASIN EVOLUTION IN THE LUBLIN AREA ALONG THE TEISSEYRE-TORNQUIST ZONE (SE POLAND) Maciej HAKENBERG & Jolanta SWIDROWSKA Institute of Geological Sciences, Polish Academy of Sciences, Twarda 51/55, 00-826 Warszawa, Poland Hakenberg, M. & Swidrowska J., 2001. Cretaceous basin evolution in the Lublin area along the Teisseyre-Tornquist Zone (SE Poland). Annales Societatis Geologorum Polononiae, 71: 1-20. Abstract: The Cretaceous basin of the Lublin area belongs to the SE part of the Mid-Polish Trough and its NE border extending on the East European Craton. Our study is based on isopach maps of seven time intervals, from Neocomian to Early Maastrichtian. Several main lithofacies have been distinguished whose areal extents were plotted on thickness pattern maps. The isopach and lithofacies maps helped to delimit the basin depocenter, providing information on vertical motions of the basin basement and synsedimentary reactivation of older fault zones. The areal extents of the siliceous and chalk lithofacies have been shown to be controlled by the positions of discontinuity zones in the crystalline basement. Two stages of accelerated subsidence have been established: in Turanian and Early Maastrichtian times. Regional comparisons of accumulation rates and their accelerations during these time spans gave possibility to distinguish the roles of eustatic and tectonic factors in the process of augmenting the basin capacity. Some remarks concerning Early Maastrichtian timing of the inversion onset are also presented. Key words: isopachs, lithofacies, subsidence, basin development, Cretaceous, Mid-Polish Trough, Teisseyre- Tornquist Zone. Manuscript received 15 June 2000, accepted 4 April 2001 INTRODUCTION This study covers the part of Poland comprised between this paper are similar to those used in that paper, dealing the boundary with Ukraine in the east and southeast, the ero- with the area of the Holy Cross Mountains (Góry Święto­ sional limit of Jurassic and Cretaceous outcrops in the krzyskie).
  • Thyroid Cancer in Children and Adolescents of Bryansk and Kaluga Regions

    Thyroid Cancer in Children and Adolescents of Bryansk and Kaluga Regions

    BY0000285 Thyroid Cancer in Children and Adolescents of Bryansk and Kaluga Regions A.F. TSYB, E.M. PARSHKOV, V.V. SHAKHTARIN, V.F. STEPANENKO, V.F. SKVORTSOV, I.V. CHEBOTAREVA MRRC RAMS, Obninsk, Russia Abstract We analyzed 62 cases of thyroid cancer in children and adolescents of Bryansk and Kaluga regions, the most contaminated as a result of the Chernobyl accident. The data on specified radiation situation as well as probable radiation doses to the thyroid are given. It is noted that the development of thyroid cancer depends on the age of children at the time of accident (0-3, 7-9, 12-15 years). They arc the most critical periods for the formation and functioning of the thyroid, in particular, in girls. It is suggested that thyroid cancer develops in children and teenagers residing in areas with higher Cs-137 contamination level at younger age than in those residing in less contaminated regions. It is shown that the minimal latent period in the development of thyroid cancer makes up to 5 years. The results of ESR method on tooth enamel specimen indicate that over postaccident period the sufficient share of children has collected such individual radiation dose which are able to affect on their health stale and development of thyroid pathology. For a long period of time Russia unlike Belarus and Ukraine was considered to be "favourable" by the development of thyroid cancer in children and adolescents after the Chernobyl accident. Such a fact appeared to be a dissonance in the common concept on the possible radiation induction of thyroid tissues to malignancy when received relatively low doses of iodine radionuclide.