DOCSLIB.ORG

PDF File Here

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PDF File Here The Sacred Nonaggression Principle Mantra for a nourishing planet Copyright © 2011 Brian Wright Free Man Publishing Company Our liberation starts by considering what we learned in kindergarten: “don’t hit, don’t steal, don’t lie…,” that is, the nonaggression principle (NaP). It shows the NaP is the moral foundation of a humane society, in fact the highest social principle: Sacred. There is none higher. The SNaP architecture of adult belief can be spread conveniently, intelligently, and quickly to everyone. When that happens, the humans win. Published 2011 by Free Man Publishing Co. The Sacred Nonaggression Principle: Mantra for a Nourishing World Copyright 2011 by Brian Wright. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without written permission of the author, except for brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. Available via Amazon.com and other bookstores. For reviews, permissions, large orders, and other inquiries, please contact us at: [email protected] Printed in the United States of America Dedication: To my fellow freedom fighters who tire of trying to slay dragons with pitch forks. Except as you become as a little child, you cannot enter the kingdom of heaven. — Jesus The Sacred Nonaggression Principle book is the packaging of seven modules from Brian Wright’s Liberation Technology User’s Guide series that describe an integrated political theory of nonaggression. The individual modules, descriptions, and access links are below: 1. Intro: The Kindergarten Rules—“Don’t hit, don’t steal, don’t lie.” The nonaggression principle comes from simple truths, and leads to core values. www.deaggress.org#2 2. Nonaggression 101—The fundamental rule of live and let live, and why it needs to be sacred. NaP details. www.deaggress.org#3 3. The Roots of Nonaggression—Psychological qualities that promote a society without coercion, the sine qua non of enlightenment. www.deaggress.org#4 4. The Barrier Cloud—Addresses main causes of obstacles to movement along the Nonaggression Vector. www.deaggress.org#1 5. Breakthru Strategy—Grand and petite strategies for busting the Barrier Cloud. www.deaggress.org#5 6. Productive Action—Taking it to the streets: undoing the state and asserting our natural freedom to live our lives. www.deaggress.org#6 7. Nonaggression Faith—Undoing the state by developing and practicing a belief system that worships the SNaP. www.deaggress.org#7 We must learn quickly to rescue freedom from the Borg, the ongoing diseased cabal of the “Men of the Power Sickness.” For more information and quantity pricing, please email: [email protected]. i Table of Contents FOREWORD ...............................................................................IX THE BOOK: “WHAT’S IN IT FOR ME?”....................................IX Why write it? ................................................................................... ix Why read it?..................................................................................... x Freedom-Inclined Readers ..........................................xi Freedom-Embarked Readers ..................................... xii PROLOGUE..............................................................................XVI THE CENTRAL ARGUMENT....................................................XIX MAP OF THE SNAP BOOK—LIBTECH MODULES.........................XX MODULE 1: THE KINDERGARTEN RULES.................................. 1-1 LET’S PRETEND WE’RE FIVE-YEAR-OLDS............................ 1-1 THE KINDERGARTEN RULES ................................................ 1-2 MORAL TENETS .................................................................. 1-3 CORE VALUES .................................................................... 1-5 GROWING UP TO THE NONAGGRESSION RULE...................... 1-6 NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES...................................... 1-7 NO PRIVILEGED ONES......................................................... 1-8 QED .................................................................................. 1-9 MODULE 2: NONAGGRESSION 101 .......................................... 2-1 THE PANG THEORY ........................................................... 2-2 BEYOND THE KINDERGARTEN RULES… ............................... 2-4 WHY THE HIGHEST?............................................................ 2-6 THE “SACRED” AND OUR MISSION ...................................... 2-8 Original thinking behind the SNaP ........................................2-8 Practical and moral arguments...............................................2-9 ‘The Sacred’ takes the moral high ground ........................2-10 WHAT IS AGGRESSION?.................................................... 2-11 BENEFITS OF THE NONAGGRESSION PRINCIPLE.................. 2-15 Safe streets: "Popsicle Index" = ~100% ............................2-16 A world without war ..................................................................2-17 ii Table of Contents Abundance ..................................................................................2-20 THE AGGRESSION SPECTRUM ........................................... 2-20 The Nolan Chart ........................................................................2-21 The Nonaggression Vector ....................................................2-23 The SNaPstrip ............................................................................2-24 THE NONAGGRESSION IDEAL............................................. 2-25 3: THE ROOTS OF NONAGGRESSION........................................ 3-1 SNAPSTRIP PLUS ............................................................... 3-2 X-Axis: Heartful Action.............................................................. 3-3 Y-Axis: The Intellectual Measure .......................................... 3-6 Z-Axis: The Spiritual Measure................................................ 3-7 THE SNAPPLOT.................................................................. 3-8 SNAPPLOT ELABORATED ................................................. 3-13 Table 3.1: X: Heart....................................................................3-13 1.1 Mental Conviction ............................................. 3-13 1.2 Mental Action .................................................... 3-14 1.3 Ethical Conviction ............................................. 3-14 1.4 Ethical Action .................................................... 3-14 1.5 Social Pressure................................................. 3-15 Table 3.2: Y: Mind .....................................................................3-15 2.1 “Psychological Domain” .................................... 3-15 2.2 Reason vs. Emotion.......................................... 3-16 2.3 Conceptual vs. Perceptual................................ 3-16 2.4 Disorders........................................................... 3-16 2.5 Primitive Brain................................................... 3-17 Table 3.3: Z: Soul......................................................................3-17 3.1 Compassion ...................................................... 3-17 3.2 Tolerance and Reason ..................................... 3-18 3.3 Courage and Character .................................... 3-18 3.4 Passion ............................................................. 3-18 3.5 Oneness............................................................ 3-19 iii Table of Contents SNAPPLOT EXAMPLE ....................................................... 3-19 SNaP MetaPolitical Quiz Instructions.................................3-23 SUMMARY......................................................................... 3-24 Next Module............................................................ 3-25 MODULE 4: THE “BARRIER CLOUD”........................................ 4-1 SNAP NATURALLY ............................................................. 4-1 THE BARRIER CLOUD.......................................................... 4-3 EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL CAUSES...................................... 4-5 External Cause—the ASL syndrome....................................4-7 Cure to the External Cause .................................... 4-11 Internal Cause—Lower-Brain Function..............................4-12 Limbic System Function.......................................... 4-13 The Jesus Salient ................................................... 4-18 Cultivation Practice ................................................. 4-25 5: “BREAKING THROUGH”—THE STRATEGIES......................... 5-1 “VISION QUEST”................................................................. 5-2 GRAND STRATEGY FOR LIBERTY ......................................... 5-4 Health Vector, Balanced Growth............................................5-7 Heart: (Independence Axis)...................................................5-11 Heart Strategy......................................................... 5-11 Mind (“Rationality” Axis)..........................................................5-12 Mind Strategy.......................................................... 5-12 Soul: (Spiritual Awareness Axis)..........................................5-13 Soul Strategy .......................................................... 5-13 PETITE STRATEGY FOR LIBERTY........................................ 5-14 Five Petite Strategies...............................................................5-15 Five BIG Tactics ........................................................................5-16
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CONSTITUTING CONSERVATISM: the GOLDWATER/PAUL ANALOG by Eric Edward English B. A. in Communication, Philosophy, and Political Sc
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by D-Scholarship@Pitt CONSTITUTING CONSERVATISM: THE GOLDWATER/PAUL ANALOG by Eric Edward English B. A. in Communication, Philosophy, and Political Science, University of Pittsburgh, 2001 M. A. in Communication, University of Pittsburgh, 2003 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This dissertation was presented by Eric Edward English It was defended on November 13, 2013 and approved by Don Bialostosky, PhD, Professor, English Gordon Mitchell, PhD, Associate Professor, Communication John Poulakos, PhD, Associate Professor, Communication Dissertation Director: John Lyne, PhD, Professor, Communication ii Copyright © by Eric Edward English 2013 iii CONSTITUTING CONSERVATISM: THE GOLDWATER/PAUL ANALOG Eric Edward English, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2013 Barry Goldwater’s 1960 campaign text The Conscience of a Conservative delivered a message of individual freedom and strictly limited government power in order to unite the fractured American conservative movement around a set of core principles. The coalition Goldwater helped constitute among libertarians, traditionalists, and anticommunists would dominate American politics for several decades. By 2008, however, the cracks in this edifice had become apparent, and the future of the movement was in clear jeopardy. That year, Ron Paul’s campaign text The Revolution: A Manifesto appeared, offering a broad vision of “freedom” strikingly similar to that of Goldwater, but differing in certain key ways. This book was an effort to reconstitute the conservative movement by expelling the hawkish descendants of the anticommunists and depicting the noninterventionist views of pre-Cold War conservatives like Robert Taft as the “true” conservative position.
    [Show full text]
  • Populism in Central and Eastern Europe – Challenge for the Future?
    Populism in Central and Eastern Europe – Challenge for the Future? Documentation of an Expert Workshop Edited by Szymon Bachrynowski, PhD Populism in Central and Eastern Europe – Challenge for the Future? Documentation of an Expert Workshop October 2012 Edited by Szymon Bachrynowski, PhD With support of: This report was published by: 3 Table of Contents Foreword 4 PopULISM IN CENTRAL EURope – challenge for the future! 5 An Introduction to the workshop and open debate Prof. Wawrzyniec K. Konarski, PhD (Jagiellonian University) POLAND 10 From periphery to power: the trajectory of Polish populism, 1989-2012 Dr. Ben Stanley, PhD (UKSW Warsaw) GERMANY 20 Populism in Germany Lionel Clesly Voss LLB (hons), MA, PhD student of Political Science (Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg) AUSTRIA 25 1. Right-wing populism in Austria: just populism or anti-party party normality? 25 Dr. Manfred Kohler, PhD (European Parliament & University of Kent) 2. Populist parties in Austria 30 Karima Aziz, MMag.a (Forum Emancipatory Islam) SLOVAKIA 34 Populism in Slovakia Peter Učeň, PhD (independent researcher) CZECH REPUBLIC 43 Populism in the Czech Republic Maroš Sovák, PhD candidate (Masaryk University) HUNGARY 48 Populism in Hungary: Conceptual Remarks Dr. Szabolcs Pogonyi, PhD (CEU Budapest) AFTERWORD 52 Populism in Central Europe – challenge for the future! – Europe Facing the Populist Challenge Prof. Dick Pels, PhD (Bureau de Helling, The Netherlands) 4 Populism in Central and Eastern Europe – Challenge for the Future? Foreword With ‘Populism in Central and Eastern Europe CEE region was a matter of intense debate and – Challenge for the Future’ we present a collec- exchange of opinions. The discussion focused on tion of contributions to a seminar and an open questions of populist politics (based on political panel debate organised by the Green European thought/ideology content) and at the same time Foundation (GEF) with support of the Heinrich presented the populist way of doing politics with Böll Stiftung Warsaw and the Warsaw School several examples from the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Ideology Chapter 9: Political Ideology|183
    CHAPTER 9: Political Ideology Chapter 9: Political Ideology|183 "Aconservativeisaman withtwoperfectlygood legswho,however,has neverlearnedhowto walkforward." FranklinDelano Roosevelt, 32ndPresidentofthe UnitedStates “Thetroublewithour liberalfriendsisnotthat theyareignorant,but thattheyknowsomuch thatisn'tso.” 9.0 | What’s in a Name? RonaldReagan, 40thPresidentofthe Have you ever been in a discussion, debate, or perhaps even a heated UnitedStates argument about government or politics where one person objected to another person’s claim by saying, “That’s not what I mean by conservative (or liberal)? If so, then join the club. People often have to stop in the middle of a good political discussion when it becomes clear that the participants do not agree on the meanings of the terms that are central to the discussion. This can be the case with ideology because people often use familiar terms such as conservative, liberal, or socialist without agreeing on their meanings. This chapter has three main goals. The first goal is to explain the role ideology plays in modern political systems. The second goal is to define the major American ideologies: conservatism, liberalism, and libertarianism. The primary focus is on modern conservatism and liberalism. The third goal is to explain their role in government and politics. Some attention is also paid to other “isms”—belief systems that have some of the attributes of an ideology—that are relevant to modern American politics such as environmentalism, feminism, terrorism, and fundamentalism. The chapter begins with an examination of ideologies in general. It then examines American conservatism, liberalism, and other belief systems relevant to modern American politics and government. 9.1 | What is an ideology? An ideology is a belief system that consists of a relatively coherent set of ideas, attitudes, or values about government and politics, AND the public policies that are designed to implement the values or achieve the goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideological Positions of Hispanic College Students in the Rio Grande Valley: Using a Two-Dimensional Model to Account for Domestic Policy Preference
    University of Texas Rio Grande Valley ScholarWorks @ UTRGV Economics and Finance Faculty Publications Robert C. Vackar College of Business & and Presentations Entrepreneurship 6-8-2018 Ideological Positions of Hispanic College Students in the Rio Grande Valley: Using a Two-Dimensional Model to Account for Domestic Policy Preference William Greene South Texas College Mi-Son Kim The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.utrgv.edu/ef_fac Part of the Finance Commons Recommended Citation Greene, William and Kim, Mi-son, Ideological Positions of Hispanic College Students in the Rio Grande Valley: Using a Two-Dimensional Model to Account for Domestic Policy Preference (October 24, 2016). Presented at the National Association of Hispanic and Latino Studies International Research Forum, South Padre Island, Texas October 24, 2016, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2859819 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Robert C. Vackar College of Business & Entrepreneurship at ScholarWorks @ UTRGV. It has been accepted for inclusion in Economics and Finance Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UTRGV. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Ideological Positions of Hispanic College Students in the Rio Grande Valley Using a Two-Dimensional Model to Account for Domestic Policy Preference William Greene Mi-son Kim South Texas College University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
    [Show full text]
  • A New Global Paradigm
    A New Global Paradigm: Understanding the Transnational Progressive Movement, the Energy Transition and the Great Transformation Strangling Alberta’s Petroleum Industry A Report for Commissioner Steve Allan Anti-Alberta Energy Public Inquiry Dr T.L. Nemeth April 2020 Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................ 2 List of Tables .................................................................................................................. 2 I. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 II. Background/Context ................................................................................................. 5 III. Transnational Progressive Movement..................................................................... 12 A. Definitions .............................................................................................................. 12 B. Climate Change Rationale for Revolution .............................................................. 17 C. Global Energy Transition ........................................................................................ 27 i. Divestment/Transforming Financial Industry ............................................. 31 ii. The Future of Hydrocarbons ....................................................................... 40 IV. Groups Involved.....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SIGCHI Conference Paper Format
    Northumbria Research Link Citation: Feltwell, Tom, Wood, Gavin, Brooker, Phillip, Rowland, Scarlett, Baumer, Eric, Long, Kiel, Vines, John, Barnett, Julie and Lawson, Shaun (2020) Broadening Exposure to Socio-Political Opinions via a Pushy Smart Home Device. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’20): April 25–30, 2020, Honolulu, HI, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, New York, NY. ISBN 9781450367080 Published by: Association for Computing Machinery, Inc URL: https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376774 <https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376774> This version was downloaded from Northumbria Research Link: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/id/eprint/41952/ Northumbria University has developed Northumbria Research Link (NRL) to enable users to access the University’s research output. Copyright © and moral rights for items on NRL are retained by the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. Single copies of full items can be reproduced, displayed or performed, and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided the authors, title and full bibliographic details are given, as well as a hyperlink and/or URL to the original metadata page. The content must not be changed in any way. Full items must not be sold commercially in any format or medium without formal permission of the copyright holder. The full policy is available online: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/policies.html This document may differ from the final, published version of the research and has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Parties in the U.S. Political System: What External and Internal Issues Shape Public Perception of Libertarian Party/Polit
    University of Texas at El Paso DigitalCommons@UTEP Open Access Theses & Dissertations 2019-01-01 Third Parties in the U.S. Political System: What External and Internal Issues Shape Public Perception of Libertarian Party/Politicians? Jacqueline Ann Fiest University of Texas at El Paso, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Fiest, Jacqueline Ann, "Third Parties in the U.S. Political System: What External and Internal Issues Shape Public Perception of Libertarian Party/Politicians?" (2019). Open Access Theses & Dissertations. 1985. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/open_etd/1985 This is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UTEP. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UTEP. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THIRD PARTIES IN THE U.S. POLITICAL SYSTEM WHAT EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL ISSUES SHAPE PUBLIC PRECEPTION OF LIBERTARIAN PARTY/POLITICIANS? JACQUELINE ANN FIEST Master’s Program in Communication APPROVED: Eduardo Barrera, Ph.D., Chair Sarah De Los Santos Upton, Ph.D. Pratyusha Basu, Ph.D. Stephen Crites, Ph.D. Dean of the Graduate School Copyright © by Jacqueline Ann Fiest 2019 Dedication This paper is dedicated to my dear friend Charlotte Wiedel. This would not have been possible without you. Thank you. THIRD PARTIES IN THE U.S. POLITICAL SYSTEM WHAT EXTERNAL AND INTERNAL ISSUES SHAPE PUBLIC PRECEPTION OF LIBERTARIAN PARTY/POLITICIANS? by JACQUELINE ANN FIEST, BA THESIS Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at El Paso in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICATION THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO May 2019 Table of Contents Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Info Page Based on Nolan Chart Political Left
    Info Page Based on Nolan Chart Political left Commonalities Political right • Labels: pacifist or apolitical • Labels: individualist, • Labels: alt-right • Parties: green, independent mutualist, anarchist, • Parties: libertarian, tea party • Iconic dress: tie-dye, counter- populist MO: rebel, disrupt • Iconic dress: baseball cap, camo, culture, tattoos • Values: self-governing, “blue collar” uniform or overalls • Stereotypes & tribe anti-authoritarian, personal • Stereotypes & tribe identification: identifications: spiritual, not responsibility redneck, prepper, manual laborer, organized religion, new age, • Economic self-sufficiency rebel (i.e., Dixie flag), fundamental- hippies, in touch with feelings, • Free open market globally ist emphasis on founding fathers & occupy Wall Street movement • Freedom = limited (small) constitution (i.e., colonial flag), right • Restorative justice government, less regulation, to bear arms, rural, small farm/ranch establishment ideology establishment - • $ Vote with your dollar states rights • $ Pro balanced budget, less taxation • At worst extreme: rejection of • Iconic institutions: ACLU • At worst extreme: fears UN as Anti political knowledge or • Beliefs: distrust institutions, harbinger of Orwellian new world involvement, escapist drug conspiracy theories Worst: order, wants govt. collapse as a culture, tragedy of commons abuse of the most vulnerable restart, eco-myths promote NWO • Labels: globalist, inclusive, collectivist • Labels: patriotic, nationalist MO: competition • Values: emphasize mercy
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— Extensions of Remarks E2088 HON
    E2088 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks December 8, 2010 has served as the Subcommittee’s Congres- to build five towers at the site, one of them office several times on the Libertarian ticket, sional Fellow over the past year. Mr. Hatch 125 stories tall. Later, Wal-Mart wanted to put most recently just this year when he ran for will return to the Department of Housing and a store there. Senate in Arizona. Despite the best efforts of Urban Development, where he will continue to Senator Kennedy’s commitment to social David and others, the Libertarian Party has perform budget and oversight work, taking justice is evident throughout the campus with never been able to achieve major party status. with him the extraordinary talents and insight murals, quotations and similar exhibits. I believe the main reason for this is the restric- he shared with the Subcommittee. Originally designed as a large, comprehen- tive ballot access laws that force new and The Transportation Subcommittee was very sive K-12 school that would house more than third parties to spend the majority of their time fortunate to have Patrick as a part of the Sub- 2,400 students, the school district determined and resources getting on the ballot, thus leav- committee team this year. He did an out- in 2008 that the facility would host wall-to-wall ing them with comparatively few resources to standing job serving as a valuable member of pilot schools, which opened this fall. Pilot devote to actually campaigning and spreading our housing policy team, researching a variety schools are innovative small schools that have their message.
    [Show full text]
  • The Road to Autocratization? Redefining Democracy in Poland1
    DOI: 10.33067/SE.3.2019.6 Jarosław Szczepański* Paulina Kalina** The Road to Autocratization? Redefi ning Democracy in Poland1 Abstract The present paper explores how political thinking in Poland changed after the election campaigns (general and presidential) of 2015. Its main goal is to determine what the current developments mean for the future of democracy in Poland. Will Poland face a new wave of autocratization – similar to Pilsudski’s one? The paper is based on empirical research conducted during the last presidential and general elections in Poland. An e-survey covering 10,000 respondents was conducted, out of whom over 4,000 left their data for further analysis. The main aim of the study was to fi nd a connection between patterns of political thinking and electoral behavior, demonstrating a link between one’s set of political values and one’s voting decisions. The ruling party in Poland openly refers to esthetics and rhetoric of an authoritarian regime introduced by Pilsudski. Its election slogan: “A good change” has been treated as reference to the interwar concept of “sanacja” driven from the Latin term “sanatio” which means to cleanse or to heal. The main goal of the Sanacja political group was to amend the then parliamentary democracy, which they believed was corrupt and ineffi cient. The authors of the paper try to present recent patterns and changes in the electorate. In its summary, the paper includes some predictions for the future of the Polish democracy, based on empirical data and observed actions of the ruling party. Key words: Europe (Central and Eastern), Democracy, Democratization, Comparative Perspective, Liberalism * Jarosław Szczepański – University of Warsaw, e-mail: [email protected], ORCID 0000-0003-4964-8695.
    [Show full text]
  • Libertarian Acceptance Among the Students of the University of Southern Mississippi
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Honors Theses Honors College Spring 5-10-2012 Libertarian Acceptance Among the Students of the University of Southern Mississippi Joseph LeBeau University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/honors_theses Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation LeBeau, Joseph, "Libertarian Acceptance Among the Students of the University of Southern Mississippi" (2012). Honors Theses. 94. https://aquila.usm.edu/honors_theses/94 This Honors College Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Southern Mississippi Libertarian Acceptance Among the Students of the University of Southern Mississippi by M. Joseph LeBeau III A Thesis Submitted to the Honors College of The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts (of Science, of Business Administration, etc.) in the Department of ____Political Science____ April 2012 Chapter One: Context and the Research Question The American political system has changed little since the founding of the country. Though the founding fathers did not expect for political parties to exist, their impact on American politics over the years has been enormous. Different parties have existed throughout American history (for example, the Federalists and Anti-Federalists in the beginnings of the American republic, along with other minor parties such as the Progressives at the turn of the 20th Century and the Tea Party movement currently), but the Republican and Democratic parties have been the two major parties for over one hundred and fifty years.
    [Show full text]
  • Approval Voting in Box Societies Patrick Eschenfeldt Harvey Mudd College
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont HMC Senior Theses HMC Student Scholarship 2012 Approval Voting in Box Societies Patrick Eschenfeldt Harvey Mudd College Recommended Citation Eschenfeldt, Patrick, "Approval Voting in Box Societies" (2012). HMC Senior Theses. 36. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/hmc_theses/36 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the HMC Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in HMC Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Approval Voting in Box Societies Patrick Eschenfeldt Francis Su, Advisor Nicholas Pippenger, Reader May, 2012 Department of Mathematics Copyright c 2012 Patrick Eschenfeldt. The author grants Harvey Mudd College and the Claremont Colleges Library the nonexclusive right to make this work available for noncommercial, educational purposes, provided that this copyright statement appears on the reproduced ma- terials and notice is given that the copying is by permission of the author. To dis- seminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the author. cbna The author is also making this work available under a Creative Commons Attribution– NonCommercial–ShareAlike license. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ for a summary of the rights given, withheld, and reserved by this license and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/ 3.0/legalcode for the full legal details. Abstract Under approval voting, every voter may vote for any number of candi- dates. To model approval voting, we let a political spectrum be the set of all possible political positions, and let each voter have a subset of the spec- trum that they approve, called an approval region.
    [Show full text]