DOCSLIB.ORG

Fort Scratchley Historic Site Heritage Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fort Scratchley Historic Site Heritage Management Plan D A W B I N Fort Scratchley Historic Site Heritage Management Plan Australian Government Department of Finance and Deregulation Fort Scratchley Newcastle, NSW Cnr Nobbys Road and Fort Drive Newcastle East 27 May 2008 SUTERS Architects In association with DAWBIN Architects HERITAGE CONSULTANTS Fort Scratchley Historic Site , Newcastle – Heritage Management Plan Contacts For further information or clarification of information contained within this document please contact the following: Mark Fenwick- Senior Associate Registered Architect - NSW ARBN 7348 Email: [email protected] Suters Architects Pty Ltd 16 Telford Street, Newcastle NSW 2300, PO Box 1109 Newcastle NSW 2300 DX 7933 Newcastle NSW T 02 4926 5222 - F 02 4926 5251 CEO - Robert Macindoe [NSW ARBN 4699] www.sutersarchitects.com.au Bruce Dawbin- Director NSW Registered Architect #3723 Dawbin Architects Pty Ltd PO Box 5101 Turramurra NSW 2074 www.dawbinarchitects.com.au Other Contributors: Laila Ellmoos, Historian, NSW Government Architects Office and Rod Caldwell, Historical Comparative Analysis Client Contact: Lauren Gray, Department of Finance and Deregulation Control Form: AF-15n Issue C File: AF-15n Report Format-Newcastle Issue Description Date Check Authorised A prelim B Draft C Draft 27March08 D Final Draft 2 May 2008 E Final Draft 4 May 2008 F Submission for review 19 May 2008 G Final Review 21 May 2008 H Final Submission 27 May 2008 Suters Architects In association with Dawbin Architects Heritage Consultants 27 May 2008 1 Fort Scratchley Historic Site , Newcastle – Heritage Management Plan Contents PART 1: INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 8 1.1 OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................... 8 1.2 CURTILAGE FOR THIS HMP........................................................................... 8 1.3 STUDY TEAM ................................................................................................. 10 1.4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................... 10 1.5 CLIENT AND STAKEHOLDERS..................................................................... 10 1.6 DEFINITIONS.................................................................................................. 11 1.7 NUMBERING OF BUILDINGS........................................................................ 12 1.8 RELATED STUDIES ....................................................................................... 12 PART 2: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................ 13 PART 3: INVESTIGATE SIGNIFICANCE..................................................................... 15 3.1 Historical Overview.......................................................................................... 15 3.2 Pictorial history ................................................................................................ 34 3.3 Conservation : 1978 – 1985......................................................................... 47 PART 4: UNDERSTANDING THE SITE - PHYSICAL EVIDENCE............................... 51 4.1 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE FABRIC ............................................... 51 4.2 LAYOUT OF BUILDINGS............................................................................... 59 4.3 Topography ..................................................................................................... 59 4.4 The Battery Emplacement 1878-82 ................................................................ 60 4.5 The Barracks Complex of buildings 1885-86.................................................. 60 4.6 The Battery complex and Gun Emplacements ............................................... 67 4.7 Modifications to structures .............................................................................. 70 4.8 The Outer Fort................................................................................................. 73 4.9 Existing conditions 2008 ................................................................................. 76 4.10 PHOTOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF THE SITE 30 APRIL 2008............................ 86 The Barbettes ................................................................................................. 88 The parade ground and Depression Range Finders...................................... 89 Battery Observation Post................................................................................ 90 The tunnels..................................................................................................... 92 The tunnels..................................................................................................... 93 Barracks Building group – Canteen and Stores B20..................................... 94 Suters Architects In association with Dawbin Architects Heritage Consultants 27 May 2008 2 Fort Scratchley Historic Site , Newcastle – Heritage Management Plan Barracks Building group – Kitchen Block B22................................................ 95 Barracks Building group - Barracks B21 ........................................................ 96 Buildings – Commandant’s Cottage, B23....................................................... 97 Driveway, and Artillery Store .......................................................................... 98 Buildings – Ancillary ....................................................................................... 99 Buildings – Ancillary ..................................................................................... 100 Buildings – Ancillary ..................................................................................... 101 PART 5: BACKGROUND TO SIGNIFICANCE, COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS: ........... 107 5.1 Background ................................................................................................... 107 5.2 Fort Scratchley Method for comparison ........................................................ 107 PART 6: ASSESSMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE............................................................ 127 6.1 General Approach ......................................................................................... 127 Basis of Assessment ..................................................................................... 127 6.2 Aspects of Significance that arise out of the Comparative Analysis............. 127 6.3 Citations and Existing Listings ...................................................................... 130 PART 7: STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE.............................................................. 132 7.1 Commonwealth Heritage LIST Criteria ........................................................ 132 National Heritage List Criteria........................................................................ 132 7.2 ASSESSMENT OF FORT SCRATCHLEY UNDER NATIONAL HERITAGE LIST CRITERIA ............................................................................................. 133 Criterion A - Historic Value............................................................................ 133 Criterion B - Rarity......................................................................................... 134 Criterion C – Scientific................................................................................... 134 Criterion D – Representative......................................................................... 134 Criterion E – Aesthetic................................................................................... 135 Criterion F - Creative/ Technical ................................................................... 135 Criterion G – Social ....................................................................................... 136 Criterion H - Associative................................................................................ 137 Criterion I – Indigenous ................................................................................. 137 7.3 Statement of Cultural Significance................................................................ 138 7.4 Significance of the Setting............................................................................. 139 7.5 View Analysis ................................................................................................ 139 7.6 Significant curtilage ....................................................................................... 139 7.7 Individual statements of significance............................................................. 140 The inner fort precinct – the battery complex............................................... 140 Suters Architects In association with Dawbin Architects Heritage Consultants 27 May 2008 3 Fort Scratchley Historic Site , Newcastle – Heritage Management Plan The Gun Emplacements............................................................................... 140 Battery Observation Post (BOP, Building 25) Code 3210........................... 142 Parade Ground Code 3110 ....................................................................... 142 Flagstaff Code 3330 ................................................................................... 142 The inner fort precinct – the buildings .......................................................... 142 The Barracks group of buildings................................................................... 143 The Commandant's Cottage (Building 23) Code 1310 ...........................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Response to Research Design
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION CONSERVATORIUM SITE MACQUARIE STREET, SYDNEY VOLUME 2 : RESPONSE TO RESEARCH DESIGN for NSW DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & SERVICES JULY 2002 CASEY & LOWE Pty Ltd Archaeology & Heritage _________________________________________________________________ 420 Marrickville Road, Marrickville NSW 2204 Tel: (02) 9568 5375 • Fax: (02) 9572 8409 • E-mail: [email protected] 1 Chapter 11: Research Design 11.0 Research Design The Meaning of the Archaeological Evidence The detailed interpretation of the archaeological evidence is found in the following chapters 12 to 16. This is where the research significance of the archaeology is explored and revealed, giving its meaning within a theoretical and social context. The main research questions that the archaeological evidence allows us to address are:1 1. Pre-European environment (Chapter 12) Evidence pertaining to the topography, geomorphology, vegetation etc. of this site prior to colonisation may contribute to research in the environmental history of the Sydney region, Aboriginal land management practices, historical ecology etc. 2. Remaking the landscape (Chapter 13) The Conservatorium site is located within one of the most significant historic and symbolic landscapes created by European settlers in Australia. The area is located between the sites of the original and replacement Government Houses, on a prominent ridge. While the utility of this ridge was first exploited by a group of windmills, utilitarian purposes soon became secondary to the Macquaries’ grandiose vision for Sydney and the Governor’s Domain in particular. The later creations of the Botanic Gardens, The Garden Palace and the Conservatorium itself, re-used, re-interpreted and created new vistas, paths and plantings to reflect the growing urban and economic importance of Sydney within the context of the British empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Creative Documentary Practice: Internalising the Systems Model Of
    Creative Documentary Practice: Internalising the Systems Model of Creativity through documentary video and online practice Susan Kerrigan BArts (Comm Studies) (UoN), Grad Cert Practice Tertiary Teaching (UoN) A creative work thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Communication & Media Arts University of Newcastle, June 2011 Declarations: Declaration 1: I hereby certify that some elements of the creative work Using Fort Scratchley which has been submitted as part of this creative PhD thesis were created in collaboration with another researcher, Kathy Freeman, who worked on the video documentary as the editor. Kathy was working at the Honours level from 2005 to 2006 and I was her Honours Supervisor. Kathy was researching the creative role of the editor, her Honours research was titled Expanding and Contracting the role of the Editor: Investigating the role of the editor in the collaborative and creative procedure of documentary film production (Freeman, 2007). While Kathy’s work dovetailed closely with my own work there was a clear separation of responsibilities and research imperatives, as each of our research topics was focussed on the creative aspects of our different production crew roles. Declaration 2: I hereby certify that the work embodied in this thesis contains one journal publication and three peer-reviewed published conference papers authored by myself. Kerrigan, S. (2010) Creative Practice Research: Interrogating creativity theories through documentary practice TEXT October 2010. Retrieved 4 November, 2010, Special Issue Number 8, from http://www.textjournal.com.au/speciss/issue8/content.htm Kerrigan, S. (2009) Applying creativity theories to a documentary filmmaker’s practice Aspera 2009 - Beyond the Screen: Retrieved from http://www.aspera.org.au/node/40 Kerrigan, S.
    [Show full text]
  • POLICE MOTU 41 3.1 Introduction 41 3 .2 the Mission Frontier 41 3.3 the Unofficial 'Visitors' Frontier 47 3.4 the Government Frontier 56
    re . I /VA �I (its story) by Tom Dutton The University of Papua New Guinea Press 1985 Published by the University of Papua New Guinea Press Copyright T. E. Dutton 1985 © All right reserved CONTENTS First published 1985 FOREWORD Vll ISBN 9980-84-007-2 PREFACE Vlll Printed in Hong Kong by Colocraft Ltd. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS xii A NOTE ON TERMINOLOGY X-lV Cover design by Takus David ABBREVIATIONS, SYMBOLS and OTHER CONVENTIONS xv GLOSSARY XVI Produced within the framework of the Languages for Intercultural Australian Academy of the THE LANGUAGE TODAY Communication in the Pacific Area Project of the 1. Humanities and under the academic auspices of the Union Academique 1.1 Introduction Internationale as publication No. 3 under the Project. 1.2 Distribution and Varieties No royalties are paid on this book. 1.3 General Overview of the Structure of Hiri (formerly Police) Motu 4 1.4 Pidgin Features of Hiri Motu 7 1.4.1 Sounds 7 1.4.2 Grammar 8 1.4.3 Vocabulary 16 2. IN THE BEGINNING: THE PRE-EUROPEAN SETTING 20 2.1 Introduction 20 2.2 The HTL(E) 22 2.3 The HTL(K) 29 2.4 Simplified Motu 36 3. INVASION AND THE NEW FRONTIER: SIMPLIFIED MOTU TO POLICE MOTU 41 3.1 Introduction 41 3 .2 The Mission Frontier 41 3.3 The Unofficial 'Visitors' Frontier 47 3.4 The Government Frontier 56 4. LAW AND ORDER: THE SPREAD OF POLICE MOTU 59 To Corinne, Brett and Anna 4.1 Introduction 59 4.2 MacGregor's Armed Native Constabulary 62 4.3 The Village Constable System 71 4.4 The Prison System 74 4.5 Conclusion 78 ECONOMIC AND OTHER DEVELOPMENT: 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Study-Newcastle-Lonely-Planet.Pdf
    Produced by Lonely Planet for Study NT NewcastleDO VIBRAne of Lonely Planet’s Top 10 Cities in Best in Travel 2011 N CREATIVE A LANET Y P ’S EL TO N P O 1 L 0 F TOP C O I T TOP E I E N S O 10 CITY I N 10 CITY ! 1 B 1 E 0 S 2 2011 T L I E N V T A R 2011 PLANE LY T’S NE T O O P L F 1 O 0 C E I N T I O E S ! 1 I 1 N 0 B 2 E L S E T V I A N R T LANET Y P ’S EL TO N P O 1 TOP L 0 F TOP C O I T 10 CITY E I E N S O 10 CITY I N ! 2011 1 B 1 E 0 LAN S P E 2 Y T 2011 T L L ’ I S E N E V T A R N T O O P L F 1 O 0 C E I N T I O E S ! 1 I 1 N 0 B 2 E L S E T V I A N R T E W RE HANI AKBAR st VER I » Age 22 from Saudi Arabia OL » From Saudi Arabia » Studying an International Foundation program What do you think of Newcastle? It’s so beautiful, not big not small, nice. It’s a good place for students who are studying, with a lot of nice people.
    [Show full text]
  • Newcastle Fortresses
    NEWCASTLE FORTRESSES Thanks to Margaret (Marg) Gayler for this article. During World War 2, Newcastle and the surrounding coast between Nelson Bay and Swansea was fortified by Defence forces to protect the east coast of New South Wales against the enemy, in case of attack from the Japanese between 1940 and 1943. There were the established Forts along the coastline, including Fort Tomaree, Fort Wallace (Stockton), Fort Scratchley, Nobbys Head (Newcastle East) and Shepherd’s Hill (Bar Beach) and Fort Redhead. The likes of Fort Tomaree (Nelson Bay), Fort Redhead (Dudley) and combined defence force that operated from Mine Camp (Catherine Hill Bay) came online during the Second World War to also protect our coast and industries like BHP from any attempt to bomb the Industries as they along with other smaller industries in the area helped in the war effort by supplying steel, razor wire, pith hats to our armed forces fighting overseas and here in Australia. With Australia at war overseas the Government of the day during the war years decided it was an urgency to fortify our coast line with not only the Army but also with the help of Navy and Air- Force in several places along the coast. So there was established a line of communication up and down the coast using all three defence forces involved. Starting with Fort Tomaree and working the way down to Fort Redhead adding a brief description of Mine Camp and the role of the RAAF, also mentioning where the Anti Aircraft placements were around Newcastle at the time of WW2.
    [Show full text]
  • Point Nepean Heritage Note
    VICTORIA’S HERITAGE POINT NEPEAN NATIONAL PARK by Daniel Catrice, 1998. As readers of this column are aware, this year has marked the centenary of two of Victoria’s oldest national parks, Wilson’s Promontory and Mount Buffalo. The celebrations have focused on the ‘centenary’ parks, with seminars, exhibitions and ‘Centenary Walks’ coordinated by the VNPA Bushwalking Program. This year several other parks are also celebrating anniversaries, but to less fanfare. Brisbane Ranges National Park was proclaimed 25 years ago. (The park’s history was the subject of a History Notes article in Sorrento Back Beach circa 1900. Courtesy of DSE Parkwatch, no. 190, September 1997). Other parks are celebrating ten years, When the Ice Age ended about 10,000 years including Point Nepean National Park, ago the sea level rose, drowning the plain and Coopracambra National Park, Lerderderg forming the shallow bay we know as Port State Park and Errinundra National Park. Phillip. Aboriginal people adapted to the changing landscape. Point Nepean became a Point Nepean was proclaimed in 1988 during important place for the hunting and gathering another anniversary year, the bicentenary of of food, particularly shellfish and fish. Middens European settlement in Australia. The are evidence today of their seasonal feasting. creation of the park was negotiated between Water birds were also hunted during summer the Commonwealth and State governments. and spring, and native animals provided For generations, Point Nepean had been abundant game. Aboriginal people altered the virtually inaccessible to the public: first as a landscape to improve food supply, subjecting Quarantine Station, and later as a army base.
    [Show full text]
  • National Heritage List Nomination Form for the Coal River Precinct
    National Heritage List NOMINATION FORM The National Heritage List is a record of places in the Australian jurisdiction that have outstanding natural, Indigenous or historic heritage values for the nation. These places they are protected by federal law under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. Nominating a place for the National Heritage List means identifying its national heritage values on this form and providing supporting evidence. If you need help in filling out this form, contact (02) 6274 2149. Form checklist 1. read the Nomination Notes for advice and tips on answering questions in this form. 2. add attachments and extra papers where indicated (Note: this material will not be returned). 3. provide your details, sign and date the form. Nominated place details Q1. What is the name of the place? The Coal River Precinct, Newcastle (NSW State Heritage Register No.1674) http://www.heritage.nsw.gov.au/07_subnav_02_2.cfm?itemid=5053900 and The Convict Lumber Yard (NSW State Heritage Register No.570). http://www.heritage.nsw.gov.au/07_subnav_02_2.cfm?itemid=5044978 For the purpose of this nomination „the place‟ including both sites is called the ‘Coal River (Mulubinba) Cultural Landscape’. Give the street address, or, if remote, describe where it is in relation to the nearest Q2. TIP town. Include its area and boundaries. Attach a map with the location and boundaries of the place clearly marked. See the Nomination Notes for map requirements. Q2a. Where is the place? Address/location: The Coal River (Mulubinba) Cultural Landscape is situated at the southern entrance to the Port of Newcastle, New South Wales.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Historic Theme: Producers
    Stockyard Creek, engraving, J MacFarlane. La Trobe Picture Collection, State Library of Victoria. Gold discoveries in the early 1870s stimulated the development of Foster, initially known as Stockyard Creek. Before the railway reached Foster in 1892, water transport was the most reliable method of moving goods into and out of the region. 4. Moving goods and cargo Providing transport networks for settlers on the land Access to transport for their produce is essential to primary Australian Historic Theme: producers. But the rapid population development of Victoria in the nineteenth century, particularly during the 1850s meant 3.8. Moving Goods and that infrastructure such as good all-weather roads, bridges and railway lines were often inadequate. Even as major roads People were constructed, they were often fi nanced by tolls, adding fi nancial burden to farmers attempting to convey their produce In the second half of the nineteenth century a great deal of to market. It is little wonder that during the 1850s, for instance, money and government effort was spent developing port and when a rapidly growing population provided a market for grain, harbour infrastructure. To a large extent, this development was fruit and vegetables, most of these products were grown linked to efforts to stimulate the economic development of the near the major centres of population, such as near the major colony by assisting the growth of agriculture and settlement goldfi elds or close to Melbourne and Geelong. Farmers with on the land. Port and harbour development was also linked access to water transport had an edge over those without it.
    [Show full text]
  • Shifting Sands at Stockton Beach Report
    NEWCASTLE CITY COUNCIL SHIFTING SANDS AT STOCKTON BEACH Prepared by: Umwelt (Australia) Pty Limited Environmental and Catchment Management Consultants in association with June 2002 1411/R04/V2 Report No. 1411/R04/V2 Prepared for: NEWCASTLE CITY COUNCIL SHIFTING SANDS AT STOCKTON BEACH Umwelt (Australia) Pty Limited Environmental and Catchment Management Consultants PO Box 838 Toronto NSW 2283 Ph. (02) 4950 5322 Fax (02) 4950 5737 Shifting Sands at Stockton Beach Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1.1 2.0 PREVIOUS STUDIES AND REPORTS ................................. 2.1 2.1 BETWEEN WIND AND WATER (COLTHEART 1997) ............................2.1 2.2 NEWCASTLE HARBOUR INVESTIGATION (PWD (1963) REPORT 104)..........................................................................................2.2 2.3 NEWCASTLE HARBOUR – HYDROGRAPHIC HISTORY (MANLEY 1963) ......................................................................................2.2 2.4 LITTORAL DRIFT IN THE VICINITY OF NEWCASTLE HARBOUR (BOLEYN AND CAMPBELL CIRCA 1966) .............................................2.4 2.5 NEWCASTLE HARBOUR SILTATION INVESTIGATION (PWD 1969)...2.5 2.6 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT DEEPENING OF NEWCASTLE HARBOUR (MSB 1976) ...................................................2.6 2.7 FEASIBILITY STUDY ON NOURISHMENT OF STOCKTON BEACH (DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 1978) ..........................................2.7 2.8 NEWCASTLE COASTLINE HAZARD DEFINITION STUDY (WBM
    [Show full text]
  • Hunter Economic Zone
    Issue No. 3/14 June 2014 The Club aims to: • encourage and further the study and conservation of Australian birds and their habitat • encourage bird observing as a leisure-time activity A Black-necked Stork pair at Hexham Swamp performing a spectacular “Up-down” display before chasing away the interloper - in this case a young female - Rod Warnock CONTENTS President’s Column 2 Conservation Issues New Members 2 Hunter Economic Zone 9 Club Activity Reports Macquarie Island now pest-free 10 Glenrock and Redhead 2 Powling Street Wetlands, Port Fairy 11 Borah TSR near Barraba 3 Bird Articles Tocal Field Days 4 Plankton makes scents for seabirds 12 Tocal Agricultural College 4 Superb Fairy-wrens sing to their chicks Rufous Scrub-bird Monitoring 5 before birth 13 Future Activity - BirdLife Seminar 5 BirdLife Australia News 13 Birding Features Birding Feature Hunter Striated Pardalote Subspecies ID 6 Trans-Tasman Birding Links since 2000 14 Trials of Photography - Oystercatchers 7 Club Night & Hunterbirding Observations 15 Featured Birdwatching Site - Allyn River 8 Club Activities June to August 18 Please send Newsletter articles direct to the Editor, HBOC postal address: Liz Crawford at: [email protected] PO Box 24 New Lambton NSW 2305 Deadline for the next edition - 31 July 2014 Website: www.hboc.org.au President’s Column I’ve just been on the phone to a lady that lives in Sydney was here for a few days visiting the area, talking to club and is part of a birdwatching group of friends that are members and attending our May club meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing the West Head of Sydney Cove
    GUNS, MAPS, RATS AND SHIPS Developing the West Head of Sydney Cove Davina Jackson PhD Travellers Club, Geographical Society of NSW 9 September 2018 Eora coastal culture depicted by First Fleet artists. Top: Paintings by the Port Jackson Painter (perhaps Thomas Watling). Bottom: Paintings by Philip Gidley King c1790. Watercolour map of the First Fleet settlement around Sydney Cove, sketched by convict artist Francis Fowkes, 1788 (SLNSW). William Bradley’s map of Sydney Cove, 1788 (SLNSW). ‘Sydney Cove Port Jackson 1788’, watercolour by William Bradley (SLNSW). Sketch of Sydney Cove drawn by Lt. William Dawes (top) using water depth soundings by Capt. John Hunter, 1788. Left: Sketches of Sydney’s first observatory, from William Dawes’s notebooks at Cambridge University Library. Right: Retrospective sketch of the cottage, drawn by Rod Bashford for Robert J. McAfee’s book, Dawes’s Meteorological Journal, 1981. Sydney Cove looking south from Dawes Point, painted by Thomas Watling, published 1794-96 (SLNSW). Looking west across Sydney Cove, engraving by James Heath, 1798. Charles Alexandre Lesueur’s ‘Plan de la ville de Sydney’, and ‘Plan de Port Jackson’, 1802. ‘View of a part of Sydney’, two sketches by Charles Alexandre Lesueur, 1802. Sydney from the north shore (detail), painting by Joseph Lycett, 1817. ‘A view of the cove and part of Sydney, New South Wales, taken from Dawe’s Battery’, sketch by James Wallis, engraving by Walter Preston 1817-18 (SLM). ‘A view of the cove and part of Sydney’ (from Dawes Battery), attributed to Joseph Lycett, 1819-20. Watercolour sketch looking west from Farm Cove (Woolloomooloo) to Fort Macquarie (Opera House site) and Fort Phillip, early 1820s.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern CBD Cable Project, Sydney Heritage Impact Assessment
    Eastern CBD Cable Project, Sydney Heritage Impact Assessment Prepared for Ausgrid October 2018 Document Control Page CLIENT: Ausgrid PROJECT: SYD18168 Eastern CBD Cable Project—Heritage Impact Assessment SITE NAME: Eastern CBD: Wentworth Avenue, College Street and Macquarie Street between Elizabeth Street and Shakespeare Place, Sydney EXTENT HERITAGE PTY LTD INTERNAL REVIEW/SIGN OFF WRITTEN BY DATE VERSION REVIEWED APPROVED Lorna Cooper Peter Douglas Ben Calvert 22 Aug 2018 Draft 22 Aug 2018 Anita Yousif Bridget San Miguel Lorna Cooper 24 Oct 2018 Final Anita Yousif 24 Oct 2018 Copyright and moral rights Historical sources and reference materials used in the preparation of this report are acknowledged and referenced in figure captions or in text citations. Reasonable effort has been made to identify, contact, acknowledge and obtain permission to use material from the relevant copyright owners. Unless otherwise specified in the contract terms for this, project Extent Heritage Pty Ltd: ° vests copyright of all material produced by Extent Heritage Pty Ltd (but excluding pre- existing material and material in which copyright is held by a third party) in the client for this project (and the client’s successors in title) ° retains the use of all material produced by Extent Heritage Pty Ltd for this project, for Extent Heritage Pty Ltd's ongoing business, and for professional presentations, academic papers, or publications. Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]