DOCSLIB.ORG

FACTS Data Dictionary Appendix

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CDW Guide for TIM and FACTS Reporting FACTS Data Dictionary Appendix © 2008 USDA Forest Service http://i-web.wo.fs.fed.us June 15, 2009 Table 1: Administrative Forest ..................................................................................................... 3 Table 2 – District ........................................................................................................................... 7 Table 3 – Land Suitability Class .................................................................................................. 26 Table 4 – Owner........................................................................................................................... 40 Table 5 – Proclaimed Forest ........................................................................................................ 41 Table 6 – State ............................................................................................................................. 46 Table 7 – UOM (Unit of Measure) .............................................................................................. 48 Table 8 – Activities ...................................................................................................................... 51 Table 9 – Methods ....................................................................................................................... 63 Table 10 – Equipment .................................................................................................................. 66 Table 11 – Funds .......................................................................................................................... 70 Table 12 – Cooperating Agencies ................................................................................................ 75 Table 13 – Activity Types............................................................................................................ 82 Table 14 – Failure ........................................................................................................................ 89 Table 15– Damage Specifiers ...................................................................................................... 91 Table 16 – Damage Degrees ...................................................................................................... 110 Table 17 – Chemicals (Non-Invasive Species) ......................................................................... 114 Table 18 – Targets ..................................................................................................................... 122 Table 19 – NAS Codes .............................................................................................................. 128 Table 20 – Chemical Products (Invasive Species) ..................................................................... 131 Table 21 – Adjuvants ................................................................................................................. 150 Table 22 - Comunities at Risk ................................................................................................... 153 Table 23 - Species on TES List.................................................................................................. 369 Table 24 – Agent Codes ............................................................................................................. 401 Table 25 – Cause ........................................................................................................................ 403 Table 26 - Congressional District .............................................................................................. 405 Table 27- County ....................................................................................................................... 415 FACTS Data Dictionary Page 2 Table 1: Administrative Forest Administrative Region Forest Code Description Code Description . 01 Northern 02 Beaverhead - Deerlodge 03 Bitterroot 04 Idaho Panhandle 05 Clearwater 08 Custer 10 Flathead 11 Gallatin 12 Helena 14 Kootenai 15 Lewis and Clark 16 Lolo 17 Nezperce 02 Rocky Mountain 02 Bighorn 03 Black Hills 04 Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison 06 Medicine Bow - Routt 07 Nebraska 09 Rio Grande 10 Arapaho-Roosevelt 12 Pike and San Isabel 13 San Juan 14 Shoshone 15 White River 03 Southwestern 01 Apache-Sitgreaves 02 Carson 03 Cibola 04 Coconino 05 Coronado 06 Gila 07 Kaibab 08 Lincoln 09 Prescott 10 Santa Fe 12 Tonto FACTS Data Dictionary Page 3 Table 1: Administrative Forest Administrative Region Forest Code Description Code Description . 04 Intermountain 01 Ashley 02 Boise 03 Bridger-Teton 05 Caribou 06 Challis 07 Dixie 08 Fishlake 09 Humboldt 10 Manti-Lasal 12 Payette 13 Salmon 14 Sawtooth 15 Targhee 17 Toiyabe 18 Uinta 19 Wasatch - Cache 05 Pacific Southwest 01 Angeles 02 Cleveland 03 Eldorado 04 Inyo 05 Klamath 06 Lassen 07 Los Padres 08 Mendocino 09 Modoc 10 Six Rivers 11 Plumas 12 San Bernardino 13 Sequoia 14 Shasta - Trinity 15 Sierra 16 Stanislaus 17 Tahoe 19 Lake Tahoe Basin FACTS Data Dictionary Page 4 Table 1: Administrative Forest Administrative Region Forest Code Description Code Description . 06 Pacific Northwest 01 Deschutes 02 Fremont 03 Gifford Pinchot 04 Malheur 05 Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie 06 Mt. Hood 07 Ochoco 08 Okanogan 09 Olympic 10 Rogue River 11 Siskiyou 12 Siuslaw 14 Umatilla 15 Umpqua 16 Wallowa-Whitman 17 Wenatchee 18 Willamette 20 Winema 21 Colville 08 Southern 01 NFs in Alabama 02 Daniel Boone 03 Chattahoochee-Oconee 04 Cherokee 05 NFs in Florida 06 Kisatchie 07 NFs in Mississippi 08 George Washington - Jefferson 09 Ouachita 10 Ozark - St. Francis 11 NFs in North Carolina 12 Francis Marion - Sumter 12 Savannah River (District 18) 16 Caribbean 60 Land Between the Lakes FACTS Data Dictionary Page 5 Table 1: Administrative Forest Administrative Region Forest Code Description Code Description . 09 Eastern 02 Chequamegon 03 Chippewa 04 Huron – Manistee 05 Mark Twain 06 Nicolet 07 Ottawa 08 Shawnee 09 Superior 10 Hiawatha 12 Hoosier 14 Wayne 19 Allegheny 20 Green Mountain – Finger Lakes 21 Monongahela 22 White Mountain 10 Alaska 02 Tongass-Stikine 03 Tongass-Chatham 04 Chugach 05 Tongass-Ketchikan FACTS Data Dictionary Page 6 Table 2 – District Region Code and Name Forest Code and Name District Code and Name 01 Northern 02 Beaverhead/Deerlodge 02 Wise River 01 Northern 02 Beaverhead/Deerlodge 03 Wisdom 01 Northern 02 Beaverhead/Deerlodge 04 Butte 01 Northern 02 Beaverhead/Deerlodge 06 Madison 01 Northern 02 Beaverhead/Deerlodge 07 Jefferson 01 Northern 02 Beaverhead/Deerlodge 01 Dillon R D 01 Northern 02 Beaverhead/Deerlodge 08 Deer Lodge 01 Northern 02 Beaverhead/Deerlodge 09 Philipsburg 01 Northern 03 Bitterroot N.F. 01 Stevensville 01 Northern 03 Bitterroot N.F. 02 Darby 01 Northern 03 Bitterroot N.F. 03 Sula 01 Northern 03 Bitterroot N.F. 04 West Fork 01 Northern 04 Idaho Panhandle 02 Avery 01 Northern 04 Idaho Panhandle 03 Fernan 01 Northern 04 Idaho Panhandle 06 Sandpoint 01 Northern 04 Idaho Panhandle 07 Bonners Ferry 01 Northern 04 Idaho Panhandle 08 Priest Lake 01 Northern 04 Idaho Panhandle 01 Wallace 01 Northern 04 Idaho Panhandle 04 Saint Maries 01 Northern 05 Clearwater 02 Palouse 01 Northern 05 Clearwater 03 North Fork 01 Northern 05 Clearwater 06 Powell 01 Northern 05 Clearwater 01 Pierce 01 Northern 05 Clearwater 05 Lochsa 01 Northern 08 Custer 01 Sheyenne 01 Northern 08 Custer 02 Beartooth 01 Northern 08 Custer 04 Ashland 01 Northern 08 Custer 06 Grand River 01 Northern 08 Custer 07 Medora 01 Northern 08 Custer 08 Mckenzie 01 Northern 08 Custer 03 Sioux 01 Northern 10 Flathead 01 Swan Lake 01 Northern 10 Flathead 04 Spotted Bear 01 Northern 10 Flathead 06 Hungry Horse 01 Northern 10 Flathead 07 Glacier View 01 Northern 10 Flathead 08 Tally Lake 01 Northern 11 Gallatin 01 Big Timber 01 Northern 11 Gallatin 02 Livingston 01 Northern 11 Gallatin 03 Gardiner 01 Northern 11 Gallatin 07 Hebgen Lake 01 Northern 11 Gallatin 06 Bozeman FACTS Data Dictionary Page 7 Table 2 – District Region Code and Name Forest Code and Name District Code and Name 01 Northern 12 Helena 01 Townsend 01 Northern 12 Helena 04 Lincoln 01 Northern 12 Helena 02 Helena 01 Northern 14 Kootenai 01 Rexford 01 Northern 14 Kootenai 03 Fortine 01 Northern 14 Kootenai 05 Libby 01 Northern 14 Kootenai 07 Cabinet 01 Northern 14 Kootenai 04 Three Rivers 01 Northern 15 Lewis And Clark 03 Belt Creek 01 Northern 15 Lewis And Clark 04 Judith 01 Northern 15 Lewis And Clark 06 Musselshell 01 Northern 15 Lewis And Clark 01 Rocky Mountain 01 Northern 15 Lewis And Clark 07 White Sulphur Springs 01 Northern 16 Lolo 03 Missoula 01 Northern 16 Lolo 04 Ninemile 01 Northern 16 Lolo 05 Plains/Thompson 01 Northern 16 Lolo 06 Seeley Lake 01 Northern 16 Lolo 07 Superior 01 Northern 16 Lolo 08 THOMPSON FALLS 01 Northern 17 Nez Perce 01 Salmon/Slate Creek 01 Northern 17 Nez Perce 04 Clearwater 01 Northern 17 Nez Perce 05 Red River 01 Northern 17 Nez Perce 06 Moose Creek 01 Northern 17 Nez Perce 07 Selway 01 Northern 17 Nez Perce 08 Elk City 01 Northern 99 Test Forest R1 03 Test District 01 Northern 99 Test Forest R1 04 Test District 01 Northern 99 Test Forest R1 05 Test District 01 Northern 99 Test Forest R1 06 Test District 01 Northern 99 Test Forest R1 07 Test District 02 Rocky Mountain 02 Bighorn 01 Powder River 02 Rocky Mountain 02 Bighorn 04 Paintrock 02 Rocky Mountain 02 Bighorn 06 Tongue 02 Rocky Mountain 02 Bighorn 05 TENSLEEP 02 Rocky Mountain 02 Bighorn 03 Medicine Wheel 02 Rocky Mountain 03 Black Hills 03 Custer-Elk Mtn. 02 Rocky Mountain 03
Recommended publications
  • Fort Benning Training Areas

    Fort Benning Training Areas

    FINAL REPORT Impacts of Military Training and Land Management on Threatened and Endangered Species in the Southeastern Fall Line Sandhills Communities SERDP Project SI-1302 MAY 2009 Dr. Rebecca R. Sharitz Dr. Donald W. Imm Ms. Kathryn R. Madden Dr. Beverly S. Collins Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, University of Georgia This document has been approved for public release. This report was prepared under contract to the Department of Defense Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP). The publication of this report does not indicate endorsement by the Department of Defense, nor should the contents be construed as reflecting the official policy or position of the Department of Defense. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the Department of Defense. i Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations …………………………………………………… iv List of Figures……………………………………………………………………...v List of Tables……………………………………………………………………...vii Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………….viii 1. Executive Summary………..………………………………………………… 1 2. Objectives……………………………………………………………………. 5 3. Background………………………………………………....………………... 6 4. Materials and Methods……..………………………………………………… 8 4.1. Characterize sandhills and related xeric woodlands and discriminate from adjacent forests………………………………………………… 8 4.2. Spatial analyses and mapping of sandhills and related xeric woodland communities and comparison with spatial information on forest management and military activities………………………… 9 4.3. Effects of forest understory control practices used to maintain RCW habitat on sandhills plant communities………………………... 9 4.4. Habitat characterization of selected TES plant species……………… 10 4.5. Development of habitat models for TES plants and identification of potential additional suitable habitat……………………………….. 11 4.6.
  • Volume 2, Chapter 10-2: Arthropods: Crustacea

    Volume 2, Chapter 10-2: Arthropods: Crustacea

    Glime, J. M. 2017. Arthropods: Crustacea – Ostracoda and Amphipoda. Chapt. 10-2. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 2. 10-2-1 Bryological Interaction. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 19 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology2/>. CHAPTER 10-2 ARTHROPODS: CRUSTACEA – OSTRACODA AND AMPHPODA TABLE OF CONTENTS CLASS OSTRACODA ..................................................................................................................................... 10-2-2 Adaptations ................................................................................................................................................ 10-2-3 Swimming to Crawling ....................................................................................................................... 10-2-3 Reproduction ....................................................................................................................................... 10-2-3 Habitats ...................................................................................................................................................... 10-2-3 Terrestrial ............................................................................................................................................ 10-2-3 Peat Bogs ............................................................................................................................................ 10-2-4 Aquatic ...............................................................................................................................................
  • A Preliminary Report of the Biology of the Genus Charpentiera (Amaranthaceae) I

    A Preliminary Report of the Biology of the Genus Charpentiera (Amaranthaceae) I

    Pacific Science (1973), Vol. 27, No.4, p. 399-405 Printed in Great Britain A Preliminary Report of the Biology of the Genus Charpentiera (Amaranthaceae) I S. H. SOHMER 2 ABSTRACT: The genus Charpentiera (Amaranthaceae), found in the Hawaiian and Austral archipelagoes, has a structurally gynodioecious but functionally dioecious breeding system. The sex ratio varies from taxon to taxon within the genus. The sex-determining mechanism is unknown. A high rate ofovule sterility is found in all the taxa, which i~ not predicted by the pollen sterility figures reported. Data concern­ ing seed size, pollen size, and seed germination potential are provided. Hybridization is demonstrated to occur between Charpentiera densiflora Sohmer and C. elliptica (Hilleb.) Heller. Reproductive isolation is reported for C. tomentosa var. tomentosa Sohmer and C. obovata Gaud. THE GENUS Charpentiera is indigenous to the often small and thinly scattered throughout the Hawaiian Islands. In 1934 it was also found mature ecosystems of the generic range. Popu­ on two of the Austral Islands approximately lations of several of the taxa, however, are 2,800 miles disjunct from Hawaii (Suessenguth sometimes numerous in certain areas such as 1936). The members of the genus are trees the heads of deep gulches in some of the highly ranging from about 8 to 40 feet high and are dissected volcanic ranges of the islands. During of diverse habit, with pendant, compound the course of the revision, the reproductive panicles of minute, anemophilous flowers. The biology of Charpentiera was investigated. fruit is indehiscent and uniovulate. A recent systematic revision of Charpentiera (Sohmer 1972) has recognized six major taxa in the SEX RATIO AND TENDENCY TO DIOECISM genus.
  • Pu'u Wa'awa'a Biological Assessment

    Pu'u Wa'awa'a Biological Assessment

    PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT PU‘U WA‘AWA‘A, NORTH KONA, HAWAII Prepared by: Jon G. Giffin Forestry & Wildlife Manager August 2003 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................................................. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. ii GENERAL SETTING...................................................................................................................1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1 Land Use Practices...............................................................................................................1 Geology..................................................................................................................................3 Lava Flows............................................................................................................................5 Lava Tubes ...........................................................................................................................5 Cinder Cones ........................................................................................................................7 Soils .......................................................................................................................................9
  • Urera Kaalae

    Urera Kaalae

    Plants Opuhe Urera kaalae SPECIES STATUS: Federally Listed as Endangered Genetic Safety Net Species J.K.Obata©Smithsonian Inst., 2005 IUCN Red List Ranking – Critically Endangered (CR D) Hawai‘i Natural Heritage Ranking ‐ Critically Imperiled (G1) Endemism – O‘ahu Critical Habitat ‐ Designated SPECIES INFORMATION: Urera kaalae, a long‐lived perennial member of the nettle family (Urticaceae), is a small tree or shrub 3 to 7 m (10 to 23 ft) tall. This species can be distinguished from the other Hawaiian species of the genus by its heart‐shaped leaves. DISTRIBUTION: Found in the central to southern parts of the Wai‘anae Mountains on O‘ahu. ABUNDANCE: The nine remaining subpopulations comprise approximately 40 plants. LOCATION AND CONDITION OF KEY HABITAT: Urera kaalae typically grows on slopes and in gulches in diverse mesic forest at elevations of 439 to 1,074 m (1,440 to 3,523 ft). The last 12 known occurrences are found on both state and privately owned land. Associated native species include Alyxia oliviformis, Antidesma platyphyllum, Asplenium kaulfusii, Athyrium sp., Canavalia sp., Charpentiera sp., Chamaesyce sp., Claoxylon sandwicense, Diospyros hillebrandii, Doryopteris sp., Freycinetia arborea, Hedyotis acuminata, Hibiscus sp., Nestegis sandwicensis, Pipturus albidus, Pleomele sp., Pouteria sandwicensis, Psychotria sp., Senna gaudichaudii (kolomona), Streblus pendulinus, Urera glabra, and Xylosma hawaiiense. THREATS: Habitat degradation by feral pigs; Competition from alien plant species; Stochastic extinction; Reduced reproductive vigor due to the small number of remaining individuals. CONSERVATION ACTIONS: The goals of conservation actions are not only to protect current populations, but also to establish new populations to reduce the risk of extinction.
  • APRIL GIFTS 2011 Compiled By: Susan F

    APRIL GIFTS 2011 Compiled By: Susan F

    APRIL GIFTS 2011 Compiled by: Susan F. Glassmeyer Cincinnati, Ohio, 2011 LittlePocketPoetry.Org APRIL GIFTS 2011 1 How Zen Ruins Poets Chase Twitchel 2 Words Can Describe Tim Nolan 3 Adjectives of Order Alexandra Teague 4 Old Men Playing Basketball B.H. Fairchild 5 Healing The Mare Linda McCarriston 6 Practicing To Walk Like A Heron Jack Ridl 7 Sanctuary Jean Valentine 8 To An Athlete Dying Young A.E. Housman 9 The Routine After Forty Jacqueline Berger 10 The Sad Truth About Rilke’s Poems Nick Lantz 11 Wall Christine Garren 12 The Heart Broken Open Ronald Pies, M.D. 13 Survey Ada Jill Schneider 14 The Bear On Main Street Dan Gerber 15 Pray For Peace Ellen Bass 16 April Saturday, 1960 David Huddle 17 For My Father Who Fears I’m Going To Hell Cindy May Murphy 18 Night Journey Theodore Roethke 19 Love Poem With Trash Compactor Andrea Cohen 20 Magic Spell of Rain Ann Blandiana 21 When Lilacs Frank X. Gaspar 22 Burning Monk Shin Yu Pai 23 Mountain Stick Peter VanToorn 24 The Hatching Kate Daniels 25 To My Father’s Business Kenneth Koch 26 The Platypus Speaks Sandra Beasley 27 The Baal Shem Tov Stephen Mitchell 28 A Peasant R.S. Thomas 29 A Green Crab’s Shell Mark Doty 30 Tieh Lien Hua LiChing Chao April Gifts #1—2011 How Zen Ruins Poets I never know exactly where these annual “April Gifts” selections will take us. I start packing my bags in January by preparing an itinerary of 30 poems and mapping out a probable monthlong course.
  • The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles

    The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles

    The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles The Chinese Navy Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles Saunders, EDITED BY Yung, Swaine, PhILLIP C. SAUNderS, ChrISToPher YUNG, and Yang MIChAeL Swaine, ANd ANdreW NIeN-dzU YANG CeNTer For The STUdY oF ChINeSe MilitarY AffairS INSTITUTe For NATIoNAL STrATeGIC STUdIeS NatioNAL deFeNSe UNIverSITY COVER 4 SPINE 990-219 NDU CHINESE NAVY COVER.indd 3 COVER 1 11/29/11 12:35 PM The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles 990-219 NDU CHINESE NAVY.indb 1 11/29/11 12:37 PM 990-219 NDU CHINESE NAVY.indb 2 11/29/11 12:37 PM The Chinese Navy: Expanding Capabilities, Evolving Roles Edited by Phillip C. Saunders, Christopher D. Yung, Michael Swaine, and Andrew Nien-Dzu Yang Published by National Defense University Press for the Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs Institute for National Strategic Studies Washington, D.C. 2011 990-219 NDU CHINESE NAVY.indb 3 11/29/11 12:37 PM Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Defense or any other agency of the Federal Government. Cleared for public release; distribution unlimited. Chapter 5 was originally published as an article of the same title in Asian Security 5, no. 2 (2009), 144–169. Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. Used by permission. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The Chinese Navy : expanding capabilities, evolving roles / edited by Phillip C. Saunders ... [et al.]. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index.
  • Crustacea: Amphipoda) in Texas and New Mexico, Usa

    Crustacea: Amphipoda) in Texas and New Mexico, Usa

    ANALYSIS OF THE GAMMARUS-PECOS COMPLEX (CRUSTACEA: AMPHIPODA) IN TEXAS AND NEW MEXICO, USA GERALD A. COLE Route 4, Box 892 Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 ABSTRACT A comparative study was made of representatives from seven populations of Gammarus in Texan and New Mexican fresh-to-miohaline waters in areas once overlain by Permian seas. They included the described species: G. pecos Cole and Bousfield (symbolized P) from Pecos Co., TX; G. hyalelloides Cole (H) from Phantom Lake Spring, Jeff Davis Co., TX; and G. desperatus Cole (D) from Chaves Co., NM. Members of other populations were examined from: San Solomon Spring (S), Toyahvale, Reeves Co., TX; a large species (C) co-occurring with H in Phantom Lake Spring; a small form (M) that came either from Phantom Lake Spring or from a spring 350 m to the north; and a species (E) from a pool near Carlsbad, Eddy Co., NM. All members of the group lack calceoli, bear C-setae on their mandibular palps, and have narrow oostegites. Coxae 1-4, in the larger individuals, are armed abundantly with long setae, and all animals have at least one spine at the posterodistal corner of the first peduncular article of the antennule. Twenty Mann-Whitney U tests were applied to certain morphologic attributes of the seven populations. The results suggest that: P and S are conspecific, with the latter showing some affinities to the larger animals (C) in the nearby Phantom Lake Spring system; C probably is a new species although more closely related to M and H than are the other four; G.
  • ES Hairy Rattleweed Pub11-14

    ES Hairy Rattleweed Pub11-14

    Publication WSFNR-21-09C February 2021 Endangered Species: HAIRY RATTLEWEED / COBWEBBY WILD INDIGO / FALSE WILD INDIGO Baptisia arachnifera Dr. Kim D. Coder, Professor of Tree Biology & Health Care / University Hill Fellow University of Georgia Warnell School of Forestry & Natural Resources The hairy rattleweed is a unique plant of the Georgia Coastal Plain. It is perennial, multi- branched, 50-80cm (20-32 inches) tall with a reddish-brown stem covered by dense silvery-white tri- chomes (plant hairs). It is in the bean family. Leaves are nearly round or heart-shaped, alternate, 3-8cm (1.2-3.2 inches) long, 2-7cm (0.8-2.8 inches) wide, leathery, with upper surface green, bottom surface yellowish, & covered with long, silvery- white trichomes. Flowering is in late June to July. Flowers are bright yellow, pea-like, and grow in erect clusters at the branch tips above the leaves. Flowers have 5 petals. Fruiting is in late summer. Fruit is a bean- pod, densely covered with trichomes, 8-15mm (0.3-0.6 inches) long. The pod tapers into a long, thin point nearly as long as the body. Hairy rattleweed is found on sandy soils in open pine woods or mixed pine-hardwoods in the southeast Coastal Plain. It is found along low, sandy ridges in pine-palmetto-gallberry flatwoods and along sandy roadsides, old fields, and under open pine plantations. This species is fire dependent and is most abundant after fire. Thinning, cutting, and burning forest sites may improve habitat. Site/soil disturbance, moderate shading, and heavy grazing destroys habitat. Figure 1 shows a general distribution of this species across the Southeastern United States.
  • Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY

    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Ackerfield, J., and J. Wen. 2002. A morphometric analysis of Hedera L. (the ivy genus, Araliaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Adansonia 24: 197-212. Adams, P. 1961. Observations on the Sagittaria subulata complex. Rhodora 63: 247-265. Adams, R.M. II, and W.J. Dress. 1982. Nodding Lilium species of eastern North America (Liliaceae). Baileya 21: 165-188. Adams, R.P. 1986. Geographic variation in Juniperus silicicola and J. virginiana of the Southeastern United States: multivariant analyses of morphology and terpenoids. Taxon 35: 31-75. ------. 1995. Revisionary study of Caribbean species of Juniperus (Cupressaceae). Phytologia 78: 134-150. ------, and T. Demeke. 1993. Systematic relationships in Juniperus based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs). Taxon 42: 553-571. Adams, W.P. 1957. A revision of the genus Ascyrum (Hypericaceae). Rhodora 59: 73-95. ------. 1962. Studies in the Guttiferae. I. A synopsis of Hypericum section Myriandra. Contr. Gray Herbarium Harv. 182: 1-51. ------, and N.K.B. Robson. 1961. A re-evaluation of the generic status of Ascyrum and Crookea (Guttiferae). Rhodora 63: 10-16. Adams, W.P. 1973. Clusiaceae of the southeastern United States. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 89: 62-71. Adler, L. 1999. Polygonum perfoliatum (mile-a-minute weed). Chinquapin 7: 4. Aedo, C., J.J. Aldasoro, and C. Navarro. 1998. Taxonomic revision of Geranium sections Batrachioidea and Divaricata (Geraniaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 594-630. Affolter, J.M. 1985. A monograph of the genus Lilaeopsis (Umbelliferae). Systematic Bot. Monographs 6. Ahles, H.E., and A.E.
  • Civil War Fought for the Union Which Represent 52% of the Sons of Harvard Killed in Action During This Conflict

    Civil War Fought for the Union Which Represent 52% of the Sons of Harvard Killed in Action During This Conflict

    Advocates for Harvard ROTC . H CRIMSON UNION ARMY VETERANS Total served Died in service Killed in action Died by disease Harvard College grads 475 73 69 26 Harvard College- non grads 114 22 Harvard Graduate schools 349 22 NA NA Total 938 117 69 26 The above total of Harvard alumni who died in the service of the Union included 5 major generals, 3 Brigadier Generals, 6 colonels, 19 LT Colonels and majors, 17 junior officers in the Army, 3 sergeants plus 3 Naval officers, including 2 Medical doctors. 72% of all Harvard alumni who served in the Civil War fought for the Union which represent 52% of the sons of Harvard killed in action during this conflict. As result among Harvard alumni, Union military losses were 10% compared with a 21% casualty rate for the Confederate Army. The battle of Gettysburg (PA) had the highest amount of Harvard alumni serving in the Union Army who were killed in action (i.e. 11), in addition 3 Harvard alumni Confederates also died in this battle. Secondly, seven Crimson warriors made the supreme sacrifice for the Union at Antietam (MD) with 5 more were killed in the battles of Cedar Mountain (VA) and Fredericksburg (VA). As expected, most of the Harvard alumni who died in the service of the Union were born and raised in the Northeastern states (e.g. 74% from Massachusetts). However, 9 Harvard alumni Union casualties were from the Mid West including one from the border state of Missouri. None of these Harvard men were from southern states. The below men who made the supreme sacrifice for their country to preserve the union which also resulted in the abolition of slavery.
  • September 24, 2018

    September 24, 2018

    September 24, 2018 Sent via Federal eRulemaking Portal to: http://www.regulations.gov Docket Nos. FWS-HQ-ES-2018-0006 FWS-HQ-ES-2018-0007 FWS-HQ-ES-2018-0009 Bridget Fahey Chief, Division of Conservation and Classification U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 5275 Leesburg Pike, MS: ES Falls Church, VA 22041-3808 [email protected] Craig Aubrey Chief, Division of Environmental Review Ecological Services Program U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 5275 Leesburg Pike, MS: ES Falls Church, VA 22041 [email protected] Samuel D. Rauch, III National Marine Fisheries Service Office of Protected Resources 1315 East-West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 [email protected] Re: Proposed Revisions of Endangered Species Act Regulations Dear Mr. Aubrey, Ms. Fahey, and Mr. Rauch: The Southern Environmental Law Center (“SELC”) submits the following comments in opposition to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s and National Marine Fisheries Service’s proposed revisions to the Endangered Species Act’s implementing regulations.1 We submit these comments on behalf of 57 organizations working to protect the natural resources of the 1 Revision of the Regulations for Prohibitions to Threatened Wildlife and Plants, 83 Fed. Reg. 35,174 (proposed July 25, 2018) (to be codified at 50 C.F.R. pt. 17); Revision of Regulations for Interagency Cooperation, 83 Fed. Reg. 35,178 (proposed July 25, 2018) (to be codified at 50 C.F.R. pt. 402); Revision of the Regulations for Listing Species and Designating Critical Habitat, 83 Fed. Reg. 35,193 (proposed July 25, 2018) (to be codified at 50 C.F.R.