Civil War Fought for the Union Which Represent 52% of the Sons of Harvard Killed in Action During This Conflict
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Guide to Information Sources and Services on the Civil War, 1984-1991. PUB DATE Dec 91 NOTE 52P.; M.L.S
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 352 062 IR 054 302 AUTHOR Rother, Jeffrey A. TITLE A Guide to Information Sources and Services on the Civil War, 1984-1991. PUB DATE Dec 91 NOTE 52p.; M.L.S. Thesis, Kent State University. PUB TYPE Dissertations/Theses Masters Theses (042) Reference Materials Bibliographies (131) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Annotated Bibliographies; Books; *Civil War (United States); Databases; *Information Sources; Organizations (Groups); Periodicals; Reference Materials; Theses; *United States History IDENTIFIERS *Military History ABSTRACT This research paper is both an annotated bibliography of books and dissertations on the Civil War that were published between 1984-1991, and an annotated guide to currently-available periodicals, online databases, and organizations. The bibliography and guide are aimed primarily at historians and Civil War buffs. Because of the large number of books on the Civil War being published, only the military history of the War and topics directly related to military history are covered. The 12 reference works that are annotated include bibliographies, dictionaries, encyclopedias, atlases, and biographical sketches. The 40 topical studies covered focus on campaigns, battles, and the military life. Book annotations are both descriptive and evaluative. The bibliography also includes 10 dissertations on the military history of the war. Seven periodicals which serve Civil War historians and buffs are briefly described, and six online bibliographic databases are given descriptive annotations. The guide concludes with descriptions of 10 organizations that sponsor or encourage research, educational, or historical activities relating to the Civil War. The paper includes an author and title index of annotated materials. (Contains 21 references.) (Author/KRN) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. -
Follow in Lincoln's Footsteps in Virginia
FOLLOW IN LINCOLN’S FOOTSTEPS IN VIRGINIA A 5 Day tour of Virginia that follows in Lincoln’s footsteps as he traveled through Central Virginia. Day One • Begin your journey at the Winchester-Frederick County Visitor Center housing the Civil War Orientation Center for the Shenandoah Valley Battlefields National Historic District. Become familiar with the onsite interpretations that walk visitors through the stages of the local battles. • Travel to Stonewall Jackson’s Headquarters. Located in a quiet residential area, this Victorian house is where Jackson spent the winter of 1861-62 and planned his famous Valley Campaign. • Enjoy lunch at The Wayside Inn – serving travelers since 1797, meals are served in eight antique filled rooms and feature authentic Colonial favorites. During the Civil War, soldiers from both the North and South frequented the Wayside Inn in search of refuge and friendship. Serving both sides in this devastating conflict, the Inn offered comfort to all who came and thus was spared the ravages of the war, even though Stonewall Jackson’s famous Valley Campaign swept past only a few miles away. • Tour Belle Grove Plantation. Civil War activity here culminated in the Battle of Cedar Creek on October 19, 1864 when Gen. Sheridan’s counterattack ended the Valley Campaign in favor of the Northern forces. The mansion served as Union headquarters. • Continue to Lexington where we’ll overnight and enjoy dinner in a local restaurant. Day Two • Meet our guide in Lexington and tour the Virginia Military Institute (VMI). The VMI Museum presents a history of the Institute and the nation as told through the lives and services of VMI Alumni and faculty. -
Chapel Rural Historic District Other Nameslsite Number: VDHR File No
NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "NIA" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property LISTED ON: Historic name: Chapel Rural Historic District Other nameslsite number: VDHR File No. 021-5025 121121201 3 Name of related multiple property listing: NIA NRHP 02/14/2014 (Enter "NIA" if property is not part of a multiple property listing 2. Location Street & number: Generallv centered along Lord Fairfax Hwy. from Millwood (south) to Harry Byrd Hw. (north); from Salem Church Rd. (west) to Chilly Hollow Rd. (east City or town: Millwood, Boyce, Berryville State: Virginia County: Clarke Not For Publication: /N/A Vicinity: 3. StatelFederal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination -request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets -does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: national -statewide X local Glicable National Register Criteria: 1 Virginia Department of Historic Resources I 1 State or Federal agencylbureau or Tribal Government I In my opinion, the property -meets -does not meet the National Register criteria. -
Timeline 1864
CIVIL WAR TIMELINE 1864 January Radical Republicans are hostile to Lincoln’s policies, fearing that they do not provide sufficient protection for ex-slaves, that the 10% amnesty plan is not strict enough, and that Southern states should demonstrate more significant efforts to eradicate the slave system before being allowed back into the Union. Consequently, Congress refuses to recognize the governments of Southern states, or to seat their elected representatives. Instead, legislators begin to work on their own Reconstruction plan, which will emerge in July as the Wade-Davis Bill. [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/reconstruction/states/sf_timeline.html] [http://www.blackhistory.harpweek.com/4Reconstruction/ReconTimeline.htm] Congress now understands the Confederacy to be the face of a deeply rooted cultural system antagonistic to the principles of a “free labor” society. Many fear that returning home rule to such a system amounts to accepting secession state by state and opening the door for such malicious local legislation as the Black Codes that eventually emerge. [Hunt] Jan. 1 TN Skirmish at Dandridge. Jan. 2 TN Skirmish at LaGrange. Nashville is in the grip of a smallpox epidemic, which will carry off a large number of soldiers, contraband workers, and city residents. It will be late March before it runs its course. Jan 5 TN Skirmish at Lawrence’s Mill. Jan. 10 TN Forrest’s troops in west Tennessee are said to have collected 2,000 recruits, 400 loaded Wagons, 800 beef cattle, and 1,000 horses and mules. Most observers consider these numbers to be exaggerated. “ The Mississippi Squadron publishes a list of the steamboats destroyed on the Mississippi and its tributaries during the war: 104 ships were burned, 71 sunk. -
Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’S Civil War Battlefields
U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service American Battlefield Protection Program Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields State of Maryland Washington, DC January 2010 Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields State of Maryland U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service American Battlefield Protection Program Washington, DC January 2010 Authority The American Battlefield Protection Program Act of 1996, as amended by the Civil War Battlefield Preservation Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-359, 111 Stat. 3016, 17 December 2002), directs the Secretary of the Interior to update the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission (CWSAC) Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields. Acknowledgments NPS Project Team Paul Hawke, Project Leader; Kathleen Madigan, Survey Coordinator; Tanya Gossett and January Ruck, Reporting; Matthew Borders, Historian; Kristie Kendall, Program Assistant. Battlefield Surveyor(s) Lisa Rupple, American Battlefield Protection Program Respondents Ted Alexander and John Howard, Antietam National Battlefield; C. Casey Reese and Pamela Underhill, Appalachian National Scenic Trail; Susan Frye, Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park; Kathy Robertson, Civil War Preservation Trust; John Nelson, Hager House Museum; Joy Beasley, Cathy Beeler, Todd Stanton, and Susan Trail, Monocacy National Battlefield; Robert Bailey and Al Preston, South Mountain Battlefield State Park. Cover: View of the sunken -
Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett
Spring Grove Cemetery, once characterized as blending "the elegance of a park with the pensive beauty of a burial-place," is the final resting- place of forty Cincinnatians who were generals during the Civil War. Forty For the Union: Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett f the forty Civil War generals who are buried in Spring Grove Cemetery, twenty-three had advanced from no military experience whatsoever to attain the highest rank in the Union Army. This remarkable feat underscores the nature of the Northern army that suppressed the rebellion of the Confed- erate states during the years 1861 to 1865. Initially, it was a force of "inspired volunteers" rather than a standing army in the European tradition. Only seven of these forty leaders were graduates of West Point: Jacob Ammen, Joshua H. Bates, Sidney Burbank, Kenner Garrard, Joseph Hooker, Alexander McCook, and Godfrey Weitzel. Four of these seven —Burbank, Garrard, Mc- Cook, and Weitzel —were in the regular army at the outbreak of the war; the other three volunteered when the war started. Only four of the forty generals had ever been in combat before: William H. Lytle, August Moor, and Joseph Hooker served in the Mexican War, and William H. Baldwin fought under Giuseppe Garibaldi in the Italian civil war. This lack of professional soldiers did not come about by chance. When the Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia in 1787, its delegates, who possessed a vast knowledge of European history, were determined not to create a legal basis for a standing army. The founding fathers believed that the stand- ing armies belonging to royalty were responsible for the endless bloody wars that plagued Europe. -
The Shadow of Napoleon Upon Lee at Gettysburg
Papers of the 2017 Gettysburg National Military Park Seminar The Shadow of Napoleon upon Lee at Gettysburg Charles Teague Every general commanding an army hopes to win the next battle. Some will dream that they might accomplish a decisive victory, and in this Robert E. Lee was no different. By the late spring of 1863 he already had notable successes in battlefield trials. But now, over two years into a devastating war, he was looking to destroy the military force that would again oppose him, thereby assuring an end to the war to the benefit of the Confederate States of America. In the late spring of 1863 he embarked upon an audacious plan that necessitated a huge vulnerability: uncovering the capital city of Richmond. His speculation, which proved prescient, was that the Union army that lay between the two capitals would be directed to pursue and block him as he advanced north Robert E. Lee, 1865 (LOC) of the Potomac River. He would thereby draw it out of entrenched defensive positions held along the Rappahannock River and into the open, stretched out by marching. He expected that force to risk a battle against his Army of Northern Virginia, one that could bring a Federal defeat such that the cities of Philadelphia, Baltimore, or Washington might succumb, morale in the North to continue the war would plummet, and the South could achieve its true independence. One of Lee’s major generals would later explain that Lee told him in the march to battle of his goal to destroy the Union army. -
James Longstreet and the Retreat from Gettysburg
“Such a night is seldom experienced…” James Longstreet and the Retreat from Gettysburg Karlton Smith, Gettysburg NMP After the repulse of Lt. Gen. James Longstreet’s Assault on July 3, 1863, Gen. Robert E. Lee, commanding the Army of Northern Virginia, knew that the only option left for him at Gettysburg was to try to disengage from his lines and return with his army to Virginia. Longstreet, commander of the army’s First Corps and Lee’s chief lieutenant, would play a significant role in this retrograde movement. As a preliminary to the general withdrawal, Longstreet decided to pull his troops back from the forward positions gained during the fighting on July 2. Lt. Col. G. Moxley Sorrel, Longstreet’s adjutant general, delivered the necessary orders to Maj. Gen. Lafayette McLaws, commanding one of Longstreet’s divisions. Sorrel offered to carry the order to Brig. Gen. Evander M. Law, commanding John B. Hood’s division, on McLaws’s right. McLaws raised objections to this order. He felt that his advanced position was important and “had been won after a deadly struggle; that the order was given no doubt because of [George] Pickett’s repulse, but as there was no pursuit there was no necessity of it.” Sorrel interrupted saying: “General, there is no discretion allowed, the order is for you to retire at once.” Gen. James Longstreet, C.S.A. (LOC) As McLaws’s forward line was withdrawing to Warfield and Seminary ridges, the Federal batteries on Little Round Top opened fire, “but by quickening the pace the aim was so disturbed that no damage was done.” McLaws’s line was followed by “clouds of skirmishers” from the Federal Army of the Potomac; however, after reinforcing his own skirmish line they were driven back from the Peach Orchard area. -
Coming Attractions to Appear in the National Tribune During Next
RECEPTION TO COMRADE KING. to our great Order. Tour administra¬ taken ill soon after his arrival, and on LiAST OV !«NE HEROES DE.\D. LOSSES. tion, short as It was, consequent upon July 16 he breathed his last; on the The Department of Marylaad, GJLJtL, the death of our beloved Chief, W. W. 17th we gathered in the hall to view Btskt Broken of NKhiMlel W. Falling CuulttM of tke Vii«a Amy la Tartoia Fell on Gives la Eathaalaatle Greetlag ta tkc Blackmar, demonstrated that in Mary¬ his remains; placid and peaceful he BMtffleldH In the Civil War Epiiiodn of tke Rebellion. land the Orand Army had a comrade slept in his flower-laden casket. Alas! and He Wm .enperately Wounded.No Editor National Tribune: I wish to How I Got Past Comniander-ta-Cfclef. to take among he could work In our cause no Other In Known to Hnre Such a Hearing fully equipped place Family ask few My grand you questions, if you will be Friday evening, Oct. 6, the comrades the chief officers as a peer of any of longer; no trace of his last battle mar¬ a Reeordtaa fto the Great Conflict. so kind as to answer them. them. red his face. 1. How men of the of Maryland turned tranquil (Spring-field 4BU.) 14.) many were killed or died Department "I^et me say, dear comrade, secure With martial music and muffled Journal, Sept. of wounds*or disease during the war Back out en masse to greet Past Command¬ you are in the love and regards of your drums we escorted his beloved remains The last of nine brothers, eight of whom of the rebellion? er-in-Chief John R. -
Battle of Gettysburg Day 1 Reading Comprehension Name: ______
Battle of Gettysburg Day 1 Reading Comprehension Name: _________________________ Read the passage and answer the questions. The Ridges of Gettysburg Anticipating a Confederate assault, Union Brigadier General John Buford and his soldiers would produce the first line of defense. Buford positioned his defenses along three ridges west of the town. Buford's goal was simply to delay the Confederate advance with his small cavalry unit until greater Union forces could assemble their defenses on the three storied ridges south of town known as Cemetery Ridge, Cemetery Hill, and Culp's Hill's. These ridges were crucial to control of Gettysburg. Whichever army could successfully occupy these heights would have superior position and would be difficult to dislodge. The Death of Major General Reynolds The first of the Confederate forces to engage at Gettysburg, under the Command of Major General Henry Heth, succeeded in advancing forward despite Buford's defenses. Soon, battles erupted in several locations, and Union forces would suffer severe casualties. Union Major General John Reynolds would be killed in battle while positioning his troops. Major General Abner Doubleday, the man eventually credited with inventing the formal game of baseball, would assume command. Fighting would intensify on a road known as the Chambersburg Pike, as Confederate forces continued to advance. Jubal Early's Successful Assault Meanwhile, Union defenses positioned north and northwest of town would soon be outflanked by Confederates under the command of Jubal Early and Robert Rodes. Despite suffering severe casualties, Early's soldiers would break through the line under the command of Union General Francis Barlow, attacking them from multiple sides and completely overwhelming them. -
MATT ATKINSON on "The Battle of Brandy Station," Which Was a TOPIC: Prelude to Gettysburg, and the Largest Cavalry Action on Our Beloved Country’S Soil
BRCWRT — Vol. XX, Issue 5, JUNE/JULY 2013 Page 1 The Newsletter of the Bull Run Civil War Round Table — Vol. XX, Issue 5, JUNE/JULY 2013 LOCAL HISTORIAN MIKE BLOCK TO SPEAK AT JUNE 13th MEETING ON THE "BATTLE OF MEMBERSHIP MEETINGS BRANDY STATION, LARGEST CAVALRY THURSDAY, June 13, 2013 BATTLE ON U.S. SOIL - JUNE 9, 1863” 7:00 P.M. Centreville Library GUEST SPEAKER: By Mark Trbovich Historian I met Mike Block many years ago at our MIKE BLOCK Round Table and always noticed his enthusiasm TOPIC: to bring us a report on Brandy Station Battlefield "BATTLE OF BRANDY STATION, and later, Cedar Mountain. I thought to myself, LARGEST CAVALRY BATTLE ON “This man is a natural speaker,” and we are so U.S. SOIL - JUNE 9, 1863” blessed to have him as our main speaker at our next meeting on June 13th. THURSDAY, July 11th As part of our Civil War Sesquicentennial An- NPS Historian/Ranger niversary events series, Mike will speak MATT ATKINSON on "The Battle of Brandy Station," which was a TOPIC: prelude to Gettysburg, and the largest cavalry action on our beloved country’s soil. "BATTLE OF VICKSBURG, A fellow member of our BRCWRT and a life- MISSISSIPPI - JULY 1863” long student of the American Civil War, Mike found his niche in Brandy Station, Virginia, when 1863, both of which have received he moved to the area in 2004. He became a very little coverage to-date. He is married to an- volunteer at the Graffiti House within weeks of other writer, best-sellling romance novelist moving and quickly fell in love with the history of Caryn Moya Block, his wife of 32 years. -
MS-017 Bickham Collection
MS-017 Bickham Collection A Collection of Historical Manuscripts at the Dayton Metro Library Dayton, Ohio Processed By: Lisa P. Rickey, Archivist April 2011 with significant assistance from the earlier efforts of: Elli Bambakidis (2002) Helen Hooven Santmyer (1956) 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents................................................................................................................ 2 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 4 Biographical Sketch............................................................................................................ 5 Bibliography & Further Reading ...................................................................................... 10 Scope and Content Note.................................................................................................... 12 Box and Folder Listing ..................................................................................................... 13 Item Level Description ..................................................................................................... 16 Series I: William D. Bickham Papers ........................................................................... 16 Box 1, Folder 1: “Weekly Anne Gazette”, 1850 .......................................................... 16 Box 1, Folder 2: Manuscript story about California Gold Rush, Undated ................... 16 Box 1, Folder 3: W. D. Bickham: Military papers, 1861-1864