DOCSLIB.ORG

Inventaire Du Fonds HENRI STILLING

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Inventaire Du Fonds HENRI STILLING Institut universitaire d’histoire de la médecine et de la santé publique Bibliothèque d’histoire de la médecine et d’éthique médicale Inventaire du Fonds HENRI STILLING CHUV | Bibliothèque d’histoire de la médecine et d’éthique médicale Inventaire du fonds Henri Stilling Réalisé sous la direction de Daniela Vaj et Danielè Calinon DV IUHM, Lausanne, 1997-2016 IUHM - Fonds Stilling H. 1 Bibliothèque d’histoire de la médecine et d’éthique médicale Institut universitaire d’histoire de la médecine et de la santé publique Avenue de Provence 82, CH-1007 Lausanne Tél. 021 314 70 52 / mailto : [email protected] Site : www.chuv.ch/iuhmsp/bibliothèque Equipe : Daniela Vaj, responsable de la bibliothèque Marie-Dominique Casse, bibliothécaire assistante Caroline Hofer, bibliothécaire assistante IUHM - Fonds Stilling H. 2 Présentation Note biographique Henri Stilling (1853 –1911) Henri Stilling est né le 1er octobre 1853 à Cassel, en Allemagne. Son père est Benedict Stilling, chirurgien et professeur célèbre pour ses progrès sur le fonctionnement des nerfs vaso-moteurs et ses recherches sur l’ovariectomie. Benedict Stilling était en relation avec les grands savants de son temps. Au terme de ses études de médecine entreprises à Leipzig, Berlin et Göttingen c’est dans cette dernière ville que Henri Stilling est reçu docteur en médecine le 9 décembre 1876. Il devient ensuite l’assistant à Göttingen, Kiel, Strasbourg, puis assistant du chirurgien Esmarch à Kiel. Contre la volonté familiale, Henri Stilling décide toutefois de renoncer à la chirurgie pour se vouer à la recherche et au professorat. Il se perfectionne en anatomie à Strasbourg avec Recklinghausen et en médecine interne à Heidelberg et à Vienne. Il se marie en 1865 avec Thekla Dor, fille du célèbre ophtalmologiste Henri Dor de Vevey et devient l’assistant de Recklinghausen à Strasbourg. Après le décès de son épouse, Stilling s’installe à Lausanne où, le 14 octobre 1890, il occupe la nouvelle chaire d’anatomie et physiologie pathologique comme professeur extraordinaire et, à partir du 26 mai 1891, comme professeur ordinaire. Il y entreprend, entre autres, des recherches sur les capsules surrénales, sur les pathologies de la rate et de la prostate. En 1891, il crée l’Institut d’anatomie pathologique, institut qu’il dirige jusqu’en 1911 date de son décès. Le professeur Stilling participe également à la fondation de la faculté de médecine de Lausanne, dont il est doyen entre 1898 et 1900. Modèle de médecin humaniste, polyglotte, auteur de nombreuses publications scientifiques, il est aussi un grand érudit, bibliophile, amateur d’art, de littérature et de musique classique. Il décède à Lausanne, le 11 juin 1911. Historique du don Henri Stilling lègue par testament à l’Institut de pathologie son importante collection de livres anciens de médecine, en exigeant que ces livres soient transférés à un future institut d’histoire de la médecine. Ces livres sont déposés après sa mort à l'Institut de pathologie puis, sous demande du docteur Hedinger, sont transférés en 1967 à la Bibliothèque Cantonale et Universitaire de Lausanne dans l'attente de la création d'un futur Institut d'histoire de la médecine. Transférés ensuite en 1992 à l’Institut d’histoire de la médecine nouvellement crée, ils constituent la base du fonds précieux de la bibliothèque de l'IUHMSP. Ces livres se distinguent facilement car ils portent un ex-libris au nom de Stilling. En 2014, une autre partie des livres de la bibliothèque Stilling, qui étaient restés à la bibliothèque de l’Institut de pathologie, a pu intégrer le reste du fonds à l’IUHMSP. Il s’agit en tout de 2’465 ouvrages de médecine, datant du 16e jusqu'au début du 20e siècle. Ces livres, catalogués comme Fonds Stilling H. (cote STI), sont tous catalogués et disponibles pour le prêt ou la consultation sur place. Daniela Vaj, IUHMSP Source : dossiers biographiques de l'IUHMSP IUHM - Fonds Stilling H. 3 Table des matières Présentation .......................................................................................................................................... 2 A Lexiques, dictionnaires, encyclopédies ................................................................................................ 7 C Histoire des sciences - Généralités ...................................................................................................... 7 Ca Bibliographies ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Cb Monographies .................................................................................................................................... 8 Cd Philosophie des sciences .................................................................................................................. 11 D Histoire de la médecine - Généralités................................................................................................ 12 Da Bibliographies, histoire du livre médical .......................................................................................... 13 De Congrès d’histoire de la médecine .................................................................................................. 14 Df Technique, instruments, appareils ................................................................................................... 14 Dh Biographies et autobiographies ................................................................................................... 16 Dl Hommages, mélanges ....................................................................................................................... 16 Dm Pathographies ................................................................................................................................. 17 DG Grèce, Rome (médecine ancienne) ............................................................................................. 17 DP Autriche ........................................................................................................................................... 18 DZ4 Berne .............................................................................................................................................. 18 DZ6 Genève ........................................................................................................................................... 18 DZ20a Lausanne .................................................................................................................................... 18 G Belles lettres de médecins ou à leur propos...................................................................................... 18 L (ancienne classification) ..................................................................................................................... 19 L (ancienne classification) ..................................................................................................................... 19 O (ancienne classification) .................................................................................................................... 19 Ob (ancienne classification) .................................................................................................................. 19 T (ancienne classification) ..................................................................................................................... 19 Z (ancienne classification) ..................................................................................................................... 20 7 Hôpitaux, policliniques, cliniques ....................................................................................................... 20 10 Anatomie .......................................................................................................................................... 20 10a Histologie ........................................................................................................................................ 38 10b Embryologie ................................................................................................................................... 41 12 Physiologie ....................................................................................................................................... 43 12 Physiologie ....................................................................................................................................... 51 14 Chimie physiologique (biochimie), chimie clinique .......................................................................... 51 16 Pharmacologie, toxicologie .............................................................................................................. 53 IUHM - Fonds Stilling H. 4 16a Pharmacie ...................................................................................................................................... 54 20 Anatomie pathologique ................................................................................................................... 55 21 (ancienne classification) .................................................................................................................. 64 22 Bactériologie, sériologie, parasitologie, microbiologie ................................................................... 65 26 Transfusion sanguine ....................................................................................................................... 71 30 Généralités et sources anciennes ...................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gastrulation
    Embryology of the spine and spinal cord Andrea Rossi, MD Neuroradiology Unit Istituto Giannina Gaslini Hospital Genoa, Italy [email protected] LEARNING OBJECTIVES: LEARNING OBJECTIVES: 1) To understand the basics of spinal 1) To understand the basics of spinal cord development cord development 2) To understand the general rules of the 2) To understand the general rules of the development of the spine development of the spine 3) To understand the peculiar variations 3) To understand the peculiar variations to the normal spine plan that occur at to the normal spine plan that occur at the CVJ the CVJ Summary of week 1 Week 2-3 GASTRULATION "It is not birth, marriage, or death, but gastrulation, which is truly the most important time in your life." Lewis Wolpert (1986) Gastrulation Conversion of the embryonic disk from a bilaminar to a trilaminar arrangement and establishment of the notochord The three primary germ layers are established The basic body plan is established, including the physical construction of the rudimentary primary body axes As a result of the movements of gastrulation, cells are brought into new positions, allowing them to interact with cells that were initially not near them. This paves the way for inductive interactions, which are the hallmark of neurulation and organogenesis Day 16 H E Day 15 Dorsal view of a 0.4 mm embryo BILAMINAR DISK CRANIAL Epiblast faces the amniotic sac node Hypoblast Primitive pit (primitive endoderm) faces the yolk sac Primitive streak CAUDAL Prospective notochordal cells Dias Dias During
    [Show full text]
  • The Medical & Scientific Library of W. Bruce
    The Medical & Scientific Library of W. Bruce Fye New York I March 11, 2019 The Medical & Scientific Library of W. Bruce Fye New York | Monday March 11, 2019, at 10am and 2pm BONHAMS LIVE ONLINE BIDDING IS INQUIRIES CLIENT SERVICES 580 Madison Avenue AVAILABLE FOR THIS SALE New York Monday – Friday 9am-5pm New York, New York 10022 Please email bids.us@bonhams. Ian Ehling +1 (212) 644 9001 www.bonhams.com com with “Live bidding” in Director +1 (212) 644 9009 fax the subject line 48 hrs before +1 (212) 644 9094 PREVIEW the auction to register for this [email protected] ILLUSTRATIONS Thursday, March 7, service. Front cover: Lot 188 10am to 5pm Tom Lamb, Director Inside front cover: Lot 53 Friday, March 8, Bidding by telephone will only be Business Development Inside back cover: Lot 261 10am to 5pm accepted on a lot with a lower +1 (917) 921 7342 Back cover: Lot 361 Saturday, March 9, estimate in excess of $1000 [email protected] 12pm to 5pm REGISTRATION Please see pages 228 to 231 Sunday, March 10, Darren Sutherland, Specialist IMPORTANT NOTICE for bidder information including +1 (212) 461 6531 12pm to 5pm Please note that all customers, Conditions of Sale, after-sale [email protected] collection and shipment. All irrespective of any previous activity SALE NUMBER: 25418 with Bonhams, are required to items listed on page 231, will be Tim Tezer, Junior Specialist complete the Bidder Registration transferred to off-site storage +1 (917) 206 1647 CATALOG: $35 Form in advance of the sale.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Atomism and Cell Theory
    Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 41 (2010) 202–211 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/shpsc Biological atomism and cell theory Daniel J. Nicholson ESRC Research Centre for Genomics in Society (Egenis), University of Exeter, Byrne House, St. Germans Road, Exeter EX4 4PJ, UK article info abstract Keywords: Biological atomism postulates that all life is composed of elementary and indivisible vital units. The activ- Biological atomism ity of a living organism is thus conceived as the result of the activities and interactions of its elementary Cell theory constituents, each of which individually already exhibits all the attributes proper to life. This paper sur- Organismal theory veys some of the key episodes in the history of biological atomism, and situates cell theory within this Reductionism tradition. The atomistic foundations of cell theory are subsequently dissected and discussed, together with the theory’s conceptual development and eventual consolidation. This paper then examines the major criticisms that have been waged against cell theory, and argues that these too can be interpreted through the prism of biological atomism as attempts to relocate the true biological atom away from the cell to a level of organization above or below it. Overall, biological atomism provides a useful perspective through which to examine the history and philosophy of cell theory, and it also opens up a new way of thinking about the epistemic decomposition of living organisms that significantly departs from the phys- icochemical reductionism of mechanistic biology.
    [Show full text]
  • Dermatology Eponyms – Sign – Lexicon(R): Part 1 Piotr Brzeziński1, Manouri P
    2XU'HUPDWRORJ\2QOLQH Historical Article Dermatology eponyms – sign – Lexicon(R): Part 1 Piotr Brzeziński1, Manouri P. Senanayake2, Irantha Karunaratne2, Anca Chiriac3 1 Department of Cosmetology, Institute of Biology and Environmental Protection, Pomeranian Academy, Slupsk, Poland, 2Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Kynsey Road, Colombo 008, Sri Lanka, 3Department of Dermatology, Nicolina Medical Center, Iasi, Romania Corresponding author: Piotr Brzezinski, MD, PhD., E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Eponyms are used almost daily in the clinical practice of dermatology. And yet, information about the person behind the eponyms is difficult to find. Indeed, who is? What is this person’s nationality? Is this person alive or dead? How can one find the paper in which this person first described the disease? Eponyms are used to describe not only disease, but also clinical signs, surgical procedures, staining techniques, pharmacological formulations, and even pieces of equipment. In this article we present the symptoms starting with (R) and other. The symptoms and their synonyms, and those who have described this symptom or phenomenon. Key words: Eponyms; Skin diseases; Sign; Phenomenon Rabbit Fever Sign Rain Rot Sign Tularemia infection [1]. Pustular desquamative dermatitis, caused by the zoonotic fungal Dermatophilus congolensis. Found in Raccoon Sign horses, cattle, sheep, and other mammals wordwide [4]. Also called Rain Scald sign and Dew Poisonning sign. 1. The periorbital bruising associated with anterior basilar skull fracture or fracture of the nose and Rain Sclad Sign neuroblastoma. Sometimes associated with the reservoir phenomenon of cerebrospinal fluid in the Also called Rain Rot sign. sinus cavity [2]. Also known as “panda eyes”.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1. History of Astrocytes
    CHAPTER 1 History of Astrocytes OUTLINE Overview 2 Camillo Golgi 16 Naming of the “Astrocyte” 18 Neuron Doctrine 2 Santiago Ramón y Cajal and Glial Purkinje and Valentin’s Kugeln 2 Functions 18 Scheiden, Schwann, and Cell Theory 3 Glial Alterations in Neurological Remak’s Remarkable Observation 4 Disease: Early Concepts 21 The Neurohistology of Robert Bentley Todd 5 Wilder Penfield, Pío Del Río-Hortega, Wilhelm His’ Seminal Contributions 7 and Delineation of the Fridtjof Nansen: The Renaissance Man 8 “Third Element” 22 Auguste Forel: Neurohistology, Penfield’s Idea to Go to Spain 24 Myrmecology, and Sexology 8 Types of Neuroglia 26 Rudolph Albert Von Kölliker: Penfield’s Description of Oligodendroglia 27 Neurohistologist and Cajal Champion 10 Coming Together: The Fruit of Penfield’s Waldeyer and the Neuronlehre Spanish Expedition 30 (Neuron Doctrine) 11 Beginning of the Modern Era 33 Conclusion 12 References 34 Development of the Concept of Neuroglia 12 Rudolf Virchow 12 Other Investigators Develop More Detailed Images of Neuroglial Cells 15 Astrocytes and Epilepsy DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802401-0.00001-6 1 © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 2 1. HIStorY OF AStrocYTES OVERVIEW In this introduction to the history of astrocytes, we wish to accomplish the following goals: (1) contextualize the evolution of the concept of neuroglia within the development of cell theory and the “neuron doctrine”; (2) explain how the concept of neuroglia arose and evolved; (3) provide an interesting overview of some of the investigators involved in defin- ing the cell types in the central nervous system (CNS); (4) select the interaction of Wilder Penfield and Pío del Río-Hortega for a more in-depth historical vignette portraying a critical period during which glial cell types were being identified, described, and separated; and (5) briefly summarize further developments that presaged the modern era of neurogliosci- ence.
    [Show full text]
  • Things Come to Life. Spontaneous Generation Revisited by Henry Harris Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002, Viii+168Pp., ISBN O 19 851538
    Symbiosis, 33 (2002) 275-278 275 Balaban, Philadelphia/Rehovot Book review Things Come to Life. Spontaneous Generation Revisited by Henry Harris Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002, viii+168pp., ISBN O 19 851538 Virtually all Western religions assert that, in the beginning, all life arose from formless materials in the earth, or sea. It was an act of creation due to some kind of divine intervention, and, for whatever reason, it was not to be repeated. Once generated, plants and animals reproduced by seed. Still, there were other, smaller creatures whose reproduction remained obscure, and this obscurity allowed for the belief that under certain circumstances, inanimate matter could generate life spontaneously by a natural process. And this idea persisted for millennia. In Things Come to Life, Henry Harris takes us on a quick tour of the history of spontaneous generation debates, the theological and philosophical preconceptions underlying them, and the sometimes ingenious experimental designs used to test contending assertions. As it was for Aristotle in the 4th century BCE, so it was to William Harvey in the 17th century, spontaneous generation was one of two ways in which some animals could be generated, the other was from parents. The durability of these beliefs, he argues, came from two related factors, the ecclesiastic scholasticism of the middle ages which militated against empirical inquiry and the intellectual dominance of Aristotle. The passing of the centuries did produce a progressively narrowing of the range of creatures still thought to be generated spontaneously. By the time of scientific revolution in the 17th century, with its newly founded empiricism, the only creatures thought to be generated spontaneously were insects.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Beginning Was the Act a Historical And
    Faculteit Letteren & Wijsbegeerte Liesbet De Kock In the Beginning was the Act A Historical and Systematic Analysis of Hermann von Helmholtz's Psychology of the Object Proefschrift voorgelegd tot het behalen van de graad van Doctor in de wijsbegeerte 2014 Der Denker stellt sich in den grossen Zusammenhang der Philosophie- und Wissenschaftsgeschichte: den dem “Philosophieren auf eigene Faust”, bei dem jedes Individuum nur in einem persönlichen zufälligen Reflex die Antwort auf die Rätsel des Seins zu finden sucht, soll ein Ende gemacht werden. […] Jeder Gedanke, jedes echte Grundmotiv des Philosophierens steht mit der Gesamtheit der übrigen in einer ideellen Gemeinschaft: und diese Gemeinschaft der Ideen ist es, die auch der geschichtlichen Betrachtung erst Sinn und Leben verleiht - Ernst Cassirer (1912), p. 252. Promotor Prof. Dr. Gertrudis Van de Vijver Copromotor Prof. Dr. Steffen Ducheyne iii Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS V PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 CHAPTER 1 4 INTRODUCTION: THE POETRY OF PERCEPTION 4 1.1 Hermann von Helmholtz: General Introduction 4 1.1.1 Selective Biography 4 1.1.2 Helmholtz and the Problem of the Object 7 1.2 The Poetry of Perception: Helmholtz’s Faust 11 1.2.1 The Realm of the Mothers: Faust in the Dark Gallery 14 1.2.2 The Symbolic Relation to the World: Chorus Mysticus 20 1.2.3 What was There in the Beginning? The First Study Room Scene 24 1.3 General Aim and Strategy 28 1.3.1 Main Research Question 28 1.3.2 The Problem of the Object: Interpretive Framework 29 1.3.2.1 Helmholtz and Empiricism: The Problem of Psychological Construction 30 1.3.2.2 Helmholtz and Kant: The A priori Structure of Understanding 32 1.3.2.3 Helmholtz and Fichte: The Problem of Differentiation 35 CHAPTER 2 39 HELMHOLTZ’S PHYSIOLOGICAL EPISTEMOLOGY AND THE GENESIS OF THE PSYCHOLOGICAL PROBLEM OF THE OBJECT 39 2.1 Introduction 39 2.2 Hermann von Helmholtz and Johannes Peter Müller 40 v 2.3 Helmholtz’s Physiological Reductionism: Anti-Vitalism 42 2.4 Goethe, Purkinje, Müller and the Primacy of Subjective Perception.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathologie Im Wandel – Betrachtungen Zum 120-Jährigen Jubiläum Der Dgp
    DEUTSCHE GESELLSCHAFT FÜR PATHOLOGIE E.V. Seit 1897 – dem Leben verpflichtet PATHOLOGIE IM WANDEL – BETRACHTUNGEN ZUM 120-JÄHRIGEN JUBILÄUM DER DGP pathologie-dgp.de VORWORT VON PROF. DR. PETER SCHIRMACHER HEIDELBERG, VORSITZENDER DER DGP Die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Pathologie zählt zu Instituts für Pathologie der Universität Königsberg den ältesten und traditionsreichen medizinischen bis zu Interviews mit Vertretern der heutigen Pa- Fachgesellschaften und wird 120 Jahre alt. thologie. Diese Zusammenstellung hat bewusst nicht den Anspruch eines Kompendiums, aber Dieses kleine Jubiläum ist eine erneute Gele- kann durch die Vielfalt der Beiträge zum Nachden- genheit, im Rückblick einige wichtige, aber auch ken über Rolle und Entwicklung der Pathologie weniger bekannte Aspekte ihrer Entwicklung zu anregen. beleuchten. Dies hat unsere AG ‚Geschichte der Pathologie‘ unternommen und ich danke hierfür Unseren Mitgliedern und Lesern wünsche ich viel allen Beteiligten ganz herzlich. So werden das Spaß bei der Lektüre. Wirken von Johannes Orth, dem Nachfolger Rudolf Virchows, aber auch von Rahel Zipkin, der ersten Ihr Frau, die auf einem Kongress der DGP ihre wis- Peter Schirmacher senschaftlichen Daten präsentierte, beleuchtet. Der Bogen reicht vom Abriss der Geschichte des INHALT 7 | Johannes Orth und sein 43 | Von der Zellular pathologie Vermächtnis an die Pathologie zur Molekular pathologie – Rück- schau und Ausblick 33 | Die Geschichte des Lehrstuhls für Pathologie der Medizinischen 53 | Perspektiven der Pathologie in Fakultät der Albertus-Universität Interviews Königsberg 39 | Dr. med. Rahel Zipkin – Die Schicksalsreise einer ausser- gewöhnlichen Pionier-Pathologin von Minsk über Bern nach Nürnberg JOHANNES ORTH UND SEIN VERMÄCHTNIS AN DIE PATHOLOGIE VON HANS GUSKI UND KATJA WEBER 6 JOHANNES ORTH · HANS GUSKI UND KATJA WEBER Im Jahre 1917, also vor 100 Jahren, beging Charité Berlin antrat, ging es ihm wie vielen ande- Johannes Orth seinen 70.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathologie in Rostock
    Pathologie in Rostock Pathology in Rostock Horst Nizze1 Summary The name of Rostock was first mentioned in 1161 by the Danish historian Saxo Grammaticus. As the oldest university in Northern Europe, the Alma mater rostochiensis was inaugurated in 1419 and is proudely called Light of the North („Leuchte des Nordens“). Its Medical Faculty belonged to the three founding faculties. As elsewhere, the roots of Rostock pathology hark back to anatomy. A Theatrum anatomicum existed since 1790. First lectures on pathology were read by Johann Wilhelm Josephi (1763-1845) who was Head of Anatomy in the so- called Dissection House („Zergliederungshaus“) situated at the Old Market of Rostock. In 1844, anatomy together with its pathology rooms moved into the Garden House („Gartenhaus“) on the university yard. From 1878 to 1930, the Pathology represented one section of the downtown Medical Studies Building. From 1930 up to now, the Pathology Institute is situated in the Strempel Street at the corner of the clinical center. The Rostock Pathology Chair was established in 1865. Since that time, the institute had ten directors. Inter alios, Ernst Schwalbe (1871-1920) was a famous teratologist at the beginning of the 20th century. Walther Fischer (1882-1969) was Head of Institute for 24 years and became well-known as oncopathologist. After World War II, Alexander Bienengräber (1911-1990) reconstructed the institute in all ist compartments to a modern standard. At present, about 40 persons, with eight pathologists among them, represent the staff of the institute. 150 medical students are taught in each semester. Scientific topics concern oral, colorectal and thyroid carcinoma, pancreatitis as well as renal and transplant pathology.
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Theory Unit Robert Remak
    Katz Hillel Day School of Boca Raton Middle School Science Morah Nomi Feinberg Jewish Contribution to Science Cell Theory Unit: Jewish Scientist Bio Bib # 2: Robert Remak Robert Remak Identifies the Cell Membrane in Cell Division Who:Robert Remak When:January 01, 1855 Why: To discover how cells originate Methods: By creating a chemical hardening agent which allowed him to observe how the membrane divided the cell Institution: University of Berlin Where: Berlin, Germany Funding: Self-Funded Technology: Chemical hardening agent, Microscope Source: https://www.science-of-aging.com/timelines/robert-remak-membrane-cell-division.php#OgsvvkuHhgIEERww.99 Robert Remak (1815-1865) was a neurologist, a physiologist, and an embryologist. He was born in Poznań, Poland, where he lived for 18 years before attending the University of Berlin to study medicine. This town and much of Poland was occupied by Prussia during his lifetime. In his papers, written in Polish, he refers to Poles as his compatriots (people he relates to and shares love of county) [3]. Later, when Prussian rule dictated that his further career depended on receiving baptism, he refused to reject his Jewish identity (Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3675270/) .After graduating, Remak accepted a position as assistant to Johannes Peter Müller. The University of Berlin could not escape anti-Semitic pressures of the time, and Remak, a Polish Jew, did not receive pay for his work in Müller's lab.2 According to legal provisions at that time, as a Jew he was also banned from occupying the post of professor in areas under Prussian rule.Working as a private physician to pay the bills, Remak set out to prove that cells originate from division.
    [Show full text]
  • Ludwig Aschoffs Medizinhistorische Arbeiten
    Aus dem Institut für Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin der Albert‐Ludwigs‐Universität Freiburg i.Br. Ludwig Aschoffs medizinhistorische Arbeiten INAUGURALDISSERTATION zur Erlangung des Medizinischen Doktorgrades der Medizinischen Fakultät der Albert‐Ludwigs‐Universität Freiburg i.Br. Vorgelegt 2009 von Katharina Reinbolz geboren in Donaueschingen Dekan: Prof. Dr. med. Christoph Peters 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. med. Karl‐Heinz Leven 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. med. Eike Walter Jahr der Promotion: 2009 1 Ludwig Aschoffs medizinhistorische Arbeiten _______________________________ 3 1.) Einleitung ____________________________________________________________ 3 1.1) Vorbemerkungen und Methode ______________________________________ 4 1.2) Forschungsstand und Quellenlage____________________________________ 5 1.3) Begriffsklärung ____________________________________________________ 8 1.3.1) Definition Medizingeschichte ____________________________________ 9 1.3.2) Hilfswissenschaft Paläopathologie _______________________________ 10 2.) Biographische Eckdaten_______________________________________________ 13 3.) Aschoffs medizinhistorische Veröffentlichungen _________________________ 14 3.1) Chronologie ______________________________________________________ 14 3.1.1) 1899 bis 1910 __________________________________________________ 15 3.1.2) 1921 bis 1925 __________________________________________________ 18 3.1.3) 1932 bis 1934 __________________________________________________ 21 3.1.4) Ab 1936 ______________________________________________________ 26
    [Show full text]
  • Discovery of the Cell and Mitosis
    Discovery of the Cell and Mitosis While some scientists argued over spontaneous generation, others were using the first microscopes to examine and describe cells. The discovery of cells was only possible after the compound microscope was invented by a Dutch lens maker, Zacharias Janssen, in 1590. English physicist Robert Hooke first described cells in 1665. He made thin slices of cork (a type of tree) and observed many small boxes that reminded him of cells (small rooms) in a monastery. So, he called what he saw under the microscope “cells”. Because the cork was already dead and dried, the cells were empty. At the time Hooke thought they had only contained water when the cork was alive. In 1670, Antony van Leeuwenhoek, built a simple microscope that would magnify at 250x. He was the first person to observe bacteria and protozoa. He studied Protists, plant cells, various types of algae, and was the first person to view bacteria, which he termed "animalcules". Leeuwenhoek discovered these bacteria while viewing scrapings from his teeth and the teeth of others. He also discovered blood cells and was the first to see living sperm cells in animals. For the next 150 years, numerous scientists used both the simple and compound microscopes to look at many types of living and non-living materials. Barthelemy Dumortier was a botanist who was the first scientist to observe reproduction by cell division in plants. In 1832, he published his findings and called the process he saw “binary fission”. In 1838, Matthias Schleiden, a German botanist, concluded that all plant tissues are composed of cells and that an embryonic plant arose from a single cell.
    [Show full text]