DOCSLIB.ORG

Download File

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download File Under the Eye of Providence: Surveilling Religious Expression in the United States Kathryn A. Montalbano Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2016 © 2016 Kathryn A. Montalbano All rights reserved ABSTRACT Under the Eye of Providence: Surveilling Religious Expression in the United States Kathryn A. Montalbano This dissertation analyzes how government agencies influenced the religious expression of Mormons of the Territory of Utah in the 1870s and 1880s, Quakers of the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) from the late 1940s to the early 1960s, and Muslims of Brooklyn, New York, from 2002 to 2013. I argue that nineteenth-century federal marshals and judges in the Territory of Utah, mid-twentieth century FBI agents throughout the United States, and New York Police Department officers in post-September 11 New York were prompted to monitor each religious community by their concerns about polygamy, communism, and terrorism, respectively. The government agencies did not just observe the communities, but they probed precisely what constituted religion itself. Table of Contents Chapter 1. Introduction: United States Government Monitoring Systems I. Introduction ……………………………………………………………..…….….…. 1 II. Three Case Studies ……………………….……………………………..…….……. 9 III. Assessing the Collection of Information ………………………………….……… 16 Chapter 2. The Mormons of the Territory of Utah: Distinguishing Between Belief and Action I. Introduction ……………………………………………………………………….… 29 II. Overview of the Legislative and Judicial Campaign ………………………..…….. 35 III. Spotting and Securing the Nation …………………………………………….…… 47 IV. The Path to Statehood .…………………………………………….…………….… 53 A. Belief Cannot Excuse Crime ………………………………………………. 59 B. Conversation as Evidence ………………………………………………….. 66 C. Mormon Americanness Revisited ………………………………………….. 74 D. Belief Can Obstruct Objectivity and Americanness ……………………….. 78 V. The Shift from Attacking Polygamy to Preserving Monogamy ……………………. 83 VI. Conclusion …………………………………………………………………….…… 99 Chapter 3. The Quakers of the AFSC: Regulating Communism in the Cold War Era I. Introduction ..………………………………………………………………….…… 122 II. The Tension Between Secrecy and Transparency ………………………….…….. 128 III. Crafting a Public Image .…………………………………………………………. 133 IV. Unveiling the FBI Surveillance Program .…………………………………..……. 137 V. The Response of the AFSC .……………………………………………………….. 164 !i VI. Conclusion …………………………………………………………………….…. 171 Chapter 4. The Muslims of Brooklyn, New York: Predicting Terrorism After September 11 I. Introduction …………………………...…………………………………………… 185 II. Radicalization …………………….……………………………………………….. 186 III. The Handschu Guidelines …….…………………………………………………. 195 IV. Raza v. City of New York A. Collection of Information …………………………………………………. 197 B. The Testimonies ……………………………………………………….….. 202 C. The Settlement ……………………………………………………….……. 221 V. Pluralism …………………………………..……………………………..…..……. 224 VI. Conclusion …………..…….………………………………….………………..… 229 Chapter 5. Conclusion: Religion, Media, and Surveillance I. Overview of the Main Contributions ………………………………………….…… 244 II. Summary of the Main Themes ……………………………………………………. 250 III. Looking Forward ………………………………………………………………… 253 Primary Sources ………………………………………………………………………………. 258 Secondary Sources ……………………………………………………………………………. 266 !ii Acknowledgements I would first and foremost like to thank the faculty and students of the Columbia Communications PhD program for providing me with a home in New York. The program offered the ideal balance of rigor and support within a collaborative, intellectual environment. We are fortunate to be part of a community of scholars who seek to build bridges rather than walls. Few scholars I have encountered so far in my academic career are quite like my advisor, Richard R. John. Since I began my graduate studies, I have admired Richard for many reasons, not the least his insatiable appetite for knowledge, his unrelenting dedication to scholarship, and his keen intuition for recognizing the value in topics that might otherwise be dismissed. Richard also possesses the distinctive ability of connecting a wide range of ideas and scholarship in a way that illuminates the vast and extensive field that is communications. Beyond all of these qualities, I have always admired Richard for his commitment to the development of his students and the well-being of his family, despite the extensive time necessarily allotted to his own research. I hope to follow this model as I start my own path as a professor. Courtney Bender, whom I consider my primary mentor outside of my own field, has been invaluable in my scholarly training. She has on more than one occasion prevented me from going down a path that was destined for a dead end. In her brilliance, perceptiveness, and precision, she has never ceased to stun me with her sharp intellect and thorough comprehensiveness in both her feedback and in her own scholarship. I am lucky to have found an academic role model such as Courtney. I would like to thank the three other main faculty members of our program: Andie Tucher, for her tireless devotion to our program, her beautiful gift of prose, and her constructive !iii comments on the visual component of surveillance; Todd Gitlin, whose ability to make interdisciplinary connections among seemingly disparate ideas guides his broad vision as the chair of our program; and Michael Schudson, whose comments and feedback are among the most thoughtful and deliberate among any of the faculty at Columbia. Thank you also to David Stark and Elizabeth Blackmar of my dissertation committee for offering their unique sociological and historical perspectives. Conversations with each of them early on in the dissertation process were exceedingly beneficial to shaping and forming my research agenda. Many intellectuals and scholars not yet mentioned have influenced my journey through academia. This list includes Randall Balmer, Casey Blake, Euan Cameron, James Carey, Samuel Cruz, E. Valentin Daniel, Sheila Greeve Davaney, Gary Dorrien, Stewart Hoover, Juraj Kittler, Brian Larkin, Lawrence Lessig, Kathryn Lofton, Frank Moretti, Brigitte Nacos, Ann Neumann, John Durham Peters, Frederick A. O. Schwarz, Jr., Neslihan "enocak, Jack Snyder, Jacob Soll, Paul Starr, Charles Taylor, Stefaan G. Verhulst, and Jonathan Zittrain, to name a few. Doctoral candidates would encounter a far more formidable task were it not for the critical guidance of librarians and archivists. I would first like to thank Donald Davis, Archivist at the American Friends Service Committee, for his genuine eagerness to assist with my research and his overall warm welcome, including a gift of the most delicious blood orange from Reading Terminal Market. I would also like to thank two members of the library staff at Swarthmore College: Wendy Chmielewski, Curator of the Swarthmore Peace Collection, and Christopher Densmore, Curator of the Friends Historical Society, for helping me to narrow down my research and hone in on the AFSC. I would additionally like to thank Jim Babcock, Library Specialist at Columbia University; Carl Hallberg, Reference Archivist at the Wyoming State Archives; Mark !iv Shelstad, Deputy State Archivist at the Wyoming State Archives; and Cody White, Archivist of the National Archives at Denver, for their assistance with my Mormon research. Thank you to the law librarians at Columbia Law School for their assistance with my Muslim research. And finally, thank you to John Tofanelli, Research Collections and Services Librarian at Columbia University; Mary Cargill, reference librarian at Columbia University; and Starr Hoffman, librarian at the Columbia Journalism School, for their indispensable assistance with the very early stages of this research. Doctoral candidates would not exist without the professors who initially inspired them to pursue graduate school. I owe my deepest gratitude to the brilliant professors of the English department at Haverford College, in particular: Rajeswari Mohan, whose upper-level class which I ambitiously attempted as a sophomore, “Textual Politics: Marxism, Feminism, and the Deconstruction,” jolted me into a world in which not only texts, but the world around me, was no longer easily comprehensible; Laura McGrane, whose gift of facilitating discussions and insightfully directing students to their better writerly selves was unmatched; Kimberly Benston, whose oral brilliance shone in diverse courses on Shakespeare and the intersection of human and animal nature, and whose mastery of writing was so evident that his students saved his email correspondence; Maud McInerney, whose passion for medieval literature helped me to push my own communications scholarship backward in time; Gustavus Stadler, whose seminar on American literature provided me with early insight into the significant impact of pragmatism on communication studies; and Debora Sherman, whose guidance of my senior research on modern Irish literature sparked my venture into communications as I sought to explore the impact of mass media on reconciliation in post-conflict Northern Ireland. I would also like to thank John !v Muse, whose scholarship pushed me to think beyond interdisciplinary boundaries. I extend a special thanks to Mark Gould of the sociology department, with whom I clashed during the first week of freshman year, but who quickly became one of my most valuable advisors. Mark ultimately encouraged
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Utah History Encyclopedia
    POLYGAMY Polygamist prisoners, State Penitentiary, 1888 When establishing the LDS Church, Joseph Smith recorded numerous revelations he claimed to receive, often in answer to questions about the Bible, which are now included in the Doctrine and Covenants, part of the LDS canon. In answer to his question as to why many of the Old Testament leaders had more than one wife, Smith received what is now known as Section 132. Although the revelation was not recorded until 1843, Smith may have received it in the 1830s and married his first plural wife, Fanny Alger, in 1835. Polygamy was not openly practiced in the Mormon Church until 1852 when Orson Pratt, an apostle, made a public speech defending it as a tenet of the church. From 1852 until 1890, Mormon Church leaders preached and encouraged members, especially those in leadership positions, to marry additional wives. A majority of the Latter-day Saints never lived the principle. The number of families involved varied by community; for example, 30 percent in St. George in 1870 and 40 percent in 1880 practiced polygamy, while only 5 percent in South Weber practiced the principle in 1880. Rather than the harems often suggested in non-Mormon sources, most Mormon husbands married only two wives. The wives usually lived in separate homes and had direct responsibility for their children. Where the wives lived near each other, the husbands usually visited each wife on a daily or weekly basis. While there were the expected troubles between wives and families, polygamy was usually not the only cause, although it certainly could cause greater tension.
    [Show full text]
  • . . by the Lighthouse Beam . . . by the Lighthouse Beam
    Worshipful Master Gary Mosmeyer - Editor John "Corky" Daut The November 2012 Issue . By The Lighthouse Beam Right Angles, Horizontals and Perpendiculars From Hiram's Lighthouse Newsletter It appears to me that there has been some confu- sion among Masons about the Lights in a Lodge, as relates to the Three Lesser Lights, The Three Great Lights, and The Three Lights, (of the lodge,) and also about the one light above the altar that is turned on when the Three Great Lights are displayed upon the Altar. I will attempt to shed some light on the questions about these lights as relates to a Lodge Room as well as to some of the other “Threes” we find in Freema- sonry. In Freemasonry, we are encouraged to tell our Brothers what we want, and that is Knowledge, in Freemasonry Light means Knowledge. So when we talk about the three Triads of lights that are in a Lodge the symbolism behind the lights is knowledge. The Three Lesser Lights and the Three Lights have often been confused, thinking that the Third Section of the Lecture of the First Degree stating that a Lodge has Three Lights which are situated in the East West and South refer to the Three Lesser Lights, which they do not. In the Webb-Preston work, which much of the ritual of the Grand Lodges of the United States is based it says; the Lights of the Lodge are three, situated in the East, West, and South. There is none in the North be- cause King Solomon’s Temple was situated so far north of the ecliptic that neither the Sun nor Moon at Me- ridian height could dart their rays into the north part of the building.
    [Show full text]
  • Eye of Provide Eye of Providence Eye of Providence
    Eye of Providence The Trinity represented in a Christian version of the Eye of Providence . The Eye of Providence (or the all-seeing eye of God) is a symbol showing an eye often surrounded by rays of light or a glory and usually enclosed by a triangle . It is sometimes interpreted as representing the eye of God watching over humankind (or divine providence ). In the modern era, the most notable depiction o f the eye is the reverse of the Great Seal of the United States , which appears on the United States one-dollar bill . Contents 1 Religious use 2 United States 3 Freemasonry 4 Other uses : 4.1 Coats of arms and seals 4.2 Currency 4.3 Other contexts Religious use Jacopo Pontormo painting year 1525, using the Eye of Providence in a triangle as a symbol of the Christian Trinity . Imagery of an all-seeing eye can be traced back to Egyptian mythology and the Eye of Horus . Buddhist texts like the Mahaparinibbana Sutta also refer to Buddha as the "Eye of the World" (although no imagery is used). It is frequently used to depict the image of God in Caodaism (the doctrines of an Indochinese religion, especially an amalgamation of features from Buddhism, Taoism, Confucianism, and Christianity .) In Medieval and Renaissance European iconography, the Eye (often with the addition of an enclosing triangle) was an explicit image of the C hristian Trinity . Seventeenth-century depictions of the Eye of Providence sometimes show it surrounded by clouds or sunbursts . In United States 1782, the Eye of Providence was adopted as part of the symbolism on the reverse side of the Great Seal of the United States .
    [Show full text]
  • Utah History Encyclopedia
    BRIGHAM YOUNG Brigham Young was born in 1801 born in Whittingham, Vermont. He was the ninth of eleven children, growing up in an unsettled frontier environment characterized by frequent family moves to various communities throughout upstate New York. Despite the influences of a strict, moralistic family and being exposed to the religious fervor that characterized the "burned-over-district" of upstate New York, he was slow to associate with a particular religious denomination until he formally joined the Methodist Church in 1824. His formal education was minimal and he was apprenticed to be a carpenter, painter, and glazier-­ trades which he used to support himself. In 1824 he met and married his first wife, Miriam Works, by whom he had two daughters. By 1830 he was living in Mendon, New York where he first came in contact with the teachings of the newly-formed Mormon Church. However, he did not submit to baptism until 14 April 1832 and only then when other members of his immediate family joined. He found Mormonism appealing in its emphasis on Christian primitivism, its millennialistic orientation, authoritarianism, certain Puritan-like beliefs, and the fact that it offered him an avenue to achieve status and recognition through its lay priesthood. Young′s commitment to Mormonism was further strengthened as a result of his initial meeting with Joseph Smith, whom he found to be a dynamic, charismatic leader and believed to be a true prophet of God. From this point on, Young threw his full energies and talent into promoting Mormonism. In the process he fulfilled several Church missions and other assignments including participation in the Zions′ Camp expedition of 1834.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Freemasons from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Jump To: Navigation , Search
    List of Freemasons From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation , search Part of a series on Masonic youth organizations Freemasonry DeMolay • A.J.E.F. • Job's Daughters International Order of the Rainbow for Girls Core articles Views of Masonry Freemasonry • Grand Lodge • Masonic • Lodge • Anti-Masonry • Anti-Masonic Party • Masonic Lodge Officers • Grand Master • Prince Hall Anti-Freemason Exhibition • Freemasonry • Regular Masonic jurisdictions • Opposition to Freemasonry within • Christianity • Continental Freemasonry Suppression of Freemasonry • History Masonic conspiracy theories • History of Freemasonry • Liberté chérie • Papal ban of Freemasonry • Taxil hoax • Masonic manuscripts • People and places Masonic bodies Masonic Temple • James Anderson • Masonic Albert Mackey • Albert Pike • Prince Hall • Masonic bodies • York Rite • Order of Mark Master John the Evangelist • John the Baptist • Masons • Holy Royal Arch • Royal Arch Masonry • William Schaw • Elizabeth Aldworth • List of Cryptic Masonry • Knights Templar • Red Cross of Freemasons • Lodge Mother Kilwinning • Constantine • Freemasons' Hall, London • House of the Temple • Scottish Rite • Knight Kadosh • The Shrine • Royal Solomon's Temple • Detroit Masonic Temple • List of Order of Jesters • Tall Cedars of Lebanon • The Grotto • Masonic buildings Societas Rosicruciana • Grand College of Rites • Other related articles Swedish Rite • Order of St. Thomas of Acon • Royal Great Architect of the Universe • Square and Compasses Order of Scotland • Order of Knight Masons • Research • Pigpen cipher • Lodge • Corks Eye of Providence • Hiram Abiff • Masonic groups for women Sprig of Acacia • Masonic Landmarks • Women and Freemasonry • Order of the Amaranth • Pike's Morals and Dogma • Propaganda Due • Dermott's Order of the Eastern Star • Co-Freemasonry • DeMolay • Ahiman Rezon • A.J.E.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft—Do Not Cite Without Permission of the Author
    Draft—Do not cite without permission of the author Chapter I: The Contradictions of American Democracy in the Antebellum Years: The Inadequacy of the Constitution; The Rise of the Anti-Slavery and Woman’s Rights Movements Between 1815 and 1860, the new nation consolidated its identity and expanded its boundaries.1 This was a time of economic growth and internal improvements.2 The antebellum era witnessed a “transformation” of the private law of torts, contracts, property, and commercial law that has been said to have unleashed “emergent entrepreneurial and commercial groups to win a disproportionate share of wealth and power in American society,” all in the name of promoting economic growth.3 These years also witnessed significant democratization of the American polity. Even though the new nation’s charter incorporated the revolutionary principle of “popular sovereignty” or the consent of the governed, its political structures and practices had been designed to be far from democratic in the beginning.4 After 1815, however, the spreading trend in the states toward universal white adult male suffrage accelerated significantly, culminating with the election of Andrew Jackson in 1828.5 The people and party operatives who put this man of humble origins into the White House poured into Washington D.C. for his inauguration. “Never before had an American ceremony of state turned into such a democratic and charismatic spectacle.”6 From the perspective of divisions between the social classes, Jacksonianism represented important gains for egalitarian thinking in politics.7 The subsequent decades before the Civil War saw a flowering of reform ferment in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Heredom, Volumes 1–26, 1992–2018 Prepared by S
    Combined Index Heredom, Volumes 1–26, 1992–2018 Prepared by S. Brent Morris, 33°, G\C\ Numbers 29°. See Kt of St Andrew Sprengseysen (1788) 9:259 1°. See Entered Apprentice Degree 30°. See Kt Kadosh Abi, Abif, Abiff. See Hiram Abif. 2°. See Fellow Craft Degree 31°. See Inspector Inquisitor Abiathar, priest of Israel 25:448, 450, 3°. See Master Mason Degree 32°. See Master of the Royal Secret 456 4°. See Secret Master Degree 33°. See Inspector General, 33° Abiram (Abhiram, Abyram), password, 5°. See Perfect Master Degree (Sacred 43°, Sup Coun. See Forty-third Degree, Elect of Pérignan 2:93 Fire, NMJ) Sup Coun Abiram (Abhiram, Abyram, Akirop), 6°. See Confidential Secretary Degree assassin of Hiram Abif 1:69; (Master of the Brazen Serpent, A 72–74; 2:90, 92, 95n5; 3:38, 43, 45; NMJ) A and G, letters, interlaced 3:29, 33, 36; 4:113, 118; 6:153, 164; 25:492; 26:230, 7°. See Provost and Judge Degree 26:251 232. See also “Masonic Assassina- 8°. See Intendant of the Building Degree “A’ The Airts The Wind Can Blaw, Of,” tion of Akirop” (David and Solomon, NMJ) R. Burns 26:62 assassination of by Joabert 12:58, 60 9°. See Élu of the Nine Degree (Master Aachen Cathedral, Eye of Providence killed in cave under burning bush of the Temple, NMJ) 20:187 3:40 10,000 Famous Freemasons, W. Denslow AAONMS. See Shriners meaning and variations of name (1957) 23:115 Aaron (brother of Moses) 1:79n; 2:95n5; 3:46; 4:119 10°.
    [Show full text]
  • The Federal Response to Mormon Polygamy, 1854 - 1887
    Mr. Peay's Horses: The Federal Response to Mormon Polygamy, 1854 - 1887 Mary K. Campbellt I. INTRODUCTION Mr. Peay was a family man. From a legal standpoint, he was also a man with a problem. The 1872 Edmunds Act had recently criminalized bigamy, polygamy, and unlawful cohabitation,1 leaving Mr. Peay in a bind. Peay had married his first wife in 1860, his second wife in 1862, and his third wife in 1867.2 He had sired numerous children by each of these women, all of whom bore his last name.3 Although Mr. Peay provided a home for each wife and her children, the Peays worked the family farm communally, often taking their meals together on the compound.4 How could Mr. Peay abide by the Act without abandoning the women and children whom he had promised to support? Hedging his bets, Mr. Peay moved in exclusively with his first wife. 5 Under the assumption that "cohabitation" required living together, he ceased to spend the night with his other families, although he continued to care for them. 6 After a jury convicted him of unlawful cohabitation in 1887,7 he argued his assumption to the Utah Supreme Court. As defense counsel asserted, "the gist of the offense is to 'ostensibly' live with [more than one woman.]' ' 8 In Mr. Peay's view, he no longer lived with his plural wives. The court emphatically rejected this interpretation of "cohabitation," declaring that "[a]ny more preposterous idea could not well be conceived."9 The use of the word "ostensibly" appeared to irritate the court.
    [Show full text]
  • Freemasonry Per Se
    World Conspiracy 81 SYMBOLS Chapter 12 1. Why do freemasons use the satanic pentagram? From the Greek, "pente", meaning five and "gramma", a letter; the pentagram is a five pointed figure formed by producing the sides of a pentagon both ways to their point of intersection, so as to form a five-pointed star. It has no specifically satanic origin or meaning and no connection to Freemasonry per se . Freemasonry has traditionally been associated with Pythagoras, and among Pythagoreans, the pentagram was a symbol of health and knowledge; the pentagram is consequently associated with initiation, as it is in masonic iconography. The pentagram (also called pentacle, pentalpha, pentacle, pentagle, or pentangle) is thought by some occultists to trace its esoteric significance to an astronomical observance of the pattern of Venus ' conjunctions with the Sun and has had many meanings in many cultures through the ages. It is only from the fact that it forms the outlines of the five-pointed star to represent the "Five Points of Fellowship", and that it was associated with Pythagoras, that it has any masonic significance. Although the pentagram can be seen as a representation of the golden ratio , whether this was part of Freemasonry’s alleged "secret teachings" or is simply a modern interpolation is a topic of some controversy. The pentagram has no relationship to the Blazing Star, which has no specified number of points. The use of a pentagram or five-pointed star in some Grand Lodge seals and banners as well as on the collar of office worn by the Masters of lodges and Grand Masters of Grand Lodges is of interest to students of masonic history and art.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Reform in the Muslim World: a Comparative Study of the Practice and Legal Framework of Polygamy in Selected Jurisdictions
    International Journal of Business & Law Research 2(3):32-44, September 2014 © SEAHI PUBLICATIONS, 2014 www.seahipaj.org ISSN: 2360-8986 LAW REFORM IN THE MUSLIM WORLD: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE PRACTICE AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF POLYGAMY IN SELECTED JURISDICTIONS YELWA, Isa Mansur Ph. D Researcher, Postgraduate & Research, Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws, International Islamic University, 53100, Jln Gombak, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia H/P +60166194962 (Malaysia) +2348068036959 (Nigeria) Email of corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper studies the framework of family law in general and of polygamy in particular in the various jurisdictions around the Muslim world. The chronicles in the application of Islamic law in relation to polygamy in those jurisdictions are comparatively analyzed based on historical developments of their legal systems on the application of Islamic law and reforms that were introduced therein to suit the needs and challenges of legal dynamism based on suitability with the people, place and time. Jurisdictions within the sphere of the study are categorized into three, namely: 1. Jurisdictions where polygamy is practiced without regulation; 2. Jurisdictions where polygamy is outlawed; and 3. Jurisdictions where polygamy is practiced under a regulated framework. For each category, a number of relevant jurisdictions are selected for study. The legal framework on polygamy in the selected jurisdictions is briefly elaborated with precision based on the applicable statutory and judicial authorities available. The social set up of the people involved in polygamy in some jurisdictions is illustrated where needed in order to unveil the legal challenges in them. For each jurisdiction, the study examines the law that applied before, subsequent reforms that were brought into them and the contemporary applicable law and its challenges if any.
    [Show full text]
  • BLAINE AMENDMENTS and POLYGAMY LAWS: the CONSTITUTIONALITY of ANTI-POLYGAMY LAWS TARGETING RELIGION Elijah L
    Western New England Law Review Volume 28 28 (2005-2006) Article 3 Issue 2 12-16-2009 BLAINE AMENDMENTS AND POLYGAMY LAWS: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ANTI-POLYGAMY LAWS TARGETING RELIGION Elijah L. Milne Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.wne.edu/lawreview Recommended Citation Elijah L. Milne, BLAINE AMENDMENTS AND POLYGAMY LAWS: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ANTI-POLYGAMY LAWS TARGETING RELIGION, 28 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 257 (2006), http://digitalcommons.law.wne.edu/lawreview/vol28/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Review & Student Publications at Digital Commons @ Western New England University School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western New England Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Western New England University School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BLAINE AMENDMENTS AND POLYGAMY LAWS: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF ANTI-POLYGAMY LAWS TARGETING RELIGION ELIJAH L. MILNE* INTRODUCfION The purpose of this article is to conduct a constitutional com­ parison of legislation and court decisions from nineteenth-century America that targeted the Mormon! practice of polygamy with state Blaine Amendments.2 State Blaine Amendments are provisions in various state constitutions that prohibit government support for "sectarian" schools.3 Many commentators believe that these amendments are a byproduct of the federal government's discrimi­ nation against Catholics during the nineteenth century,4 and argue that they are unconstitutional because of the animus they embody against the Catholic Church.5 This argument has come to the fore * M.A. Candidate, University of Utah; J.D., May 2006, Michigan State Univer­ sity College of Law; B.A., 2003, Brigham Young University.
    [Show full text]
  • Marriage, Free Exercise, and the Constitution
    Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality Volume 26 Issue 1 Article 2 June 2008 Marriage, Free Exercise, and the Constitution Mark Strasser Follow this and additional works at: https://lawandinequality.org/ Recommended Citation Mark Strasser, Marriage, Free Exercise, and the Constitution, 26(1) LAW & INEQ. 59 (2008). Available at: https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/lawineq/vol26/iss1/2 Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality is published by the University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing. Marriage, Free Exercise, and the Constitution Mark Strassert Introduction Same-sex marriage opponents frequently suggest that if same-sex unions are constitutionally protected, then polygamous unions must also be protected, as if no more must be said to establish that neither should be recognized. 1 Yet, this reductio ad absurdum fails for two distinct reasons. First, even were it constitutionally permissible for states to ban polygamous relationships, that hardly would establish that same-sex unions could also be prohibited, since the kinds of reasons that tend to be accepted as justifications for polygamy bans have little or no force in the same-sex marriage context. 2 Second, the case establishing the permissibility of polygamy bans is not nearly as obvious or strong as its opponents imply. Indeed, a strong case can be made 3 for the proposition that polygamy is constitutionally protected. Part I of this Article briefly discusses the oft-made claim that if same-sex marriages are constitutionally protected, then plural marriages must also be protected. This Part suggests that although that argument is false because the two are distinguishable in constitutionally significant ways, a good argument can be made for the proposition that both same-sex marriage and plural marriage are constitutionally protected.
    [Show full text]