DOCSLIB.ORG

The Inner Poduct Space Definition. Suppose V Is a Vector Space Over F

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Inner Poduct Space Definition. Suppose V Is a Vector Space Over F The Inner Poduct Space Definition. Suppose V is a vector space over F ≡ R, C or H and ε : V × V → F is a biadditive map; i.e. ε(x + y, z)=ε(x, z)+ε(y, z), and ε(z,x + y)=ε(z,x)+ε(z,y), ∀x, y, z ∈ V. The biadditive map ε is said to be (pure) bilinear if ε(λx, y)=λε(x, y), and ε(x, λy)=λε(x, y) ∀λ ∈ F. The biadditive map ε is said to be (hermitian) bilinear if ε(xλ, y)=λε(x, y), and ε(x, yλ)=λε(x, y) ∀λ ∈ F. • If F ≡ H and ε is pure bilinear, then ε = 0 because ε(x, y)λµ = ε(xλ, yµ)=ε(x, y)µλ, while µ, λ ∈ H can be chosen so that [µ, λ] ≡ µλ − λµ =0.6 Thus, for F ≡ H there is only one kind of bilinear, namely, hermitian bilinear. Definition. Suppose V is a finite dimensional vector space over F ≡ R, C or H. An inner product ε on V is a nondegenerate bilinear form on V that is either symmetric or skew. If F = C, then there are two types of symmetric and two types of skew: pure and hermitian. The four types of inner products are: (1) R-symmetric: ε is R-bilinear and ε(x, y)=ε(y, x), (2) C-symmetric: ε is C-bilinear and ε(x, y)=ε(y, x), (3) C-hermitian symmetric: ε is C-hermitian bilinear and ε(x, y)=ε(y, x), (4) H-hermitian symmetric: ε is H-hermitian bilinear and ε(x, y)=ε(y, x). The four types of inner products are: (1) R-skew or R-sympletic: ε is R-bilinear and ε(x, y)=−ε(y, x), (2) C-skew or C-sympletic: ε is C-bilinear and ε(x, y)=−ε(y, x), (3) C-hermitian skew: ε is C-hermitian bilinear and ε(x, y)=−ε(y, x), (4) H-hermitian skew: ε is H-hermitian bilinear and ε(x, y)=−ε(y, x). The Standard Models (1) R-symmetric: The vector space is Rn, denoted by R(p, q), p + q = n, with ε(x, y)=x1y1 + ···+ xpyp −···−xnyn; n (2) C-symmetric: C with ε(z,w)=z1w1 + ···+ znwn; (3) C-hermitian symmetric: The vector space is Cn, denoted by C(p, q), p+q = n, with ε(z,w)=z1w1 + ···+ zpwp −···−znwn; (4) H-hermitian symmetric: The vector space is Hn, denoted by H(p, q), p+q = n, with ε(x, y)=x1y1 + ···+ xpyp −···−xnyn. Typeset by AMS-TEX 1 2 And (1) R-skew or R-sympletic: The vector space is R2n with ε(x, y)=x1y2 − x2y1 + ···+ x2n−1y2n −···−x2ny2n−1; ε =dx1 ∧ dx2 + ···+ dx2n−1 ∧ dx2n; (2) C-skew or C-sympletic: The vector space is C2n with ε(z,w)=z1w2 − z2w1 + ···+ z2n−1w2n − z2nw2n−1; ε =dz1 ∧ dz2 + ···+ dz2n−1 ∧ dz2n; (3) C-hermitian skew: The vector space is Cn, denoted by C(p, q), p + q = n, with ε(z,w)=iz1w1 + ···+ izpwp −···−iznwn; (4) H-hermitian skew: The vector space is Hn with ε(x, y)=x1iy1 + ···+ xniyn. Basic Theorem 5. Suppose (V,ε) is an inner product space of one of the eight types. Then V is isometric to the standard model of the same type that has the same dimension and signature. Corollary 6. Suppose (V,ε) and (V,ε) are two inner product spaces of the same e type. The dimension and signature aree the same iff V and V are isometric. e 3 The Parts of An Inner Product • Suppose ε is one of the eight types of inner products. If ε is either C-valued or H-valued, then ε has various parts. (I) The simplest case is when ε is a complex-valued inner product. Then ε has a real part α and an imaginary part β defined by the equation ε = α + iβ. (II) Suppose ε is a quaterion valued inner product. There are several options for analyzing the part of ε. (II.1) First, ε has a real part α and a pure imaginary part β defined by ε = α + β where α =Reε is real-valued and β =Imε takes on values in Im H = span{i, j, k}. – The imaginary part β has three components defined by β = iβ1 + jβ2 + kβ3, where the parts β1, β2, β3 are real-valued. (II.2) Second, using the complex-valued Ri (right multiplication by i)onH, each quaterion x ∈ H has a unique decomposition x = z + jw, where z, w ∈ C. Therefore ε = γ + jδ where γ = α + iβi and δ = βj − iβk. (I) C-Hermitian Symmetric • Consider the standard C-hermitian (symmetric) form ε(z,w)=z1w1 + ···+ zpwp −···−znwn. with signature p, q on Cn. Since ε is complex-valued, it has a real and imaginary part given by ε = g − iw. For z = x+iy and w = ξ +iη ∈ Cn =∼ R2n, the real and imaginary parts g =Reε and ω = −Im ε are given by g(z,w)=x1ξ1 + y1η1 + ···+ xpξp + ypηp −···−xnξn − ynηn and ω(z,w)=−x1η1 + y1ξ1 −···+ xnηn − ynξn. • Thus, g is the standard R-symmetric form on R2n with signature 2p,2q. • Modulo some sign changes, w is the standard sympletic form on R2n. In this context, when q =0,w is exactly the standard K¨ahlerform on Cn and is usually written as i i w = dz ∧ dz + ···+ dz ∧ dz . 2 1 1 2 n n 4 Lemma 7. Suppose ε is C-hermitian symmetric (signature p, q) on a complex vector space V with complex structure i. Then g =Reε is R-symmetric with signature 2p, 2q and w =Imε is R-skew. Moreover, each determines the other by (1) g(z,w)=ω(iz, w) and ω(z,w)=g(iz, w). Also i is an isometry for both g and w: g(iz, iw)=g(z,w) and ω(iz, iw)=ω(z,w). • Conversely, given R-symmetric form g with i an isometry, if ω is determined by (1), then ε = g − iω is C-hermitian. Also, given R-skew form ω with i an isometry, if g is determined by (1), then ε = g − iω is C-hermitian. Remark. Lemma 7 can be summarized by saying that . “The confluence of any two of (a) complex geometry, (b) sympletic geometry, (c) Riemannian geometry is K¨ahlergeomety.” Definition. Suppose (V,ε) is C-hermitian symmetric inner product space with signature p, q. Let GL(n, C) =EndC(V ), U(p, q) =the subgroup of GL(V,C) fixing ε, O(2p, 2q) =the subgroup of GL(V,R) fixing g =Reε, Spin(V,R) =the subgroup of GL(V,R) fixing ω =Imε. Corollary 8. The intersection of any two of the three groups GL(n, C), Spin(n, R), and O(2p, 2q) is the group U(p, q). 5 (II) H-Hermitian Symmetric • Consider the standard C-hermitian (symmetric) form ε(z,w)=z1w1 + ···+ zpwp −···−znwn. t with signature p, q on Cn. Note that ε is H-valued. – As noted earlier, it is natural to consider H as two copies of C, H =∼ C ⊕ jC, or z = z + jw. In particular, ε = h + jσ, with h and σ complex-valued. • For x = z + jw and y = ξ + jη with z,w,ξ,η ∈ C, xy =(z − jw)(ξ + jη)=zξ − jwjη + zjη − jwξ (3) =zξ + wη + j(zη − wξ). Therefore, the first complex part of h of ε is given by h(x, y)=z1ξ1 + w1η1 + ···+ zpξp + wpηp −···−znξn − wnηn Thus h is the standard C-hermitian symmetric form on C2n =∼ Hn. • Because of (3) the second complex part σ is given by σ(x, y)=z1η1 − w1ξ1 ±···±znηn ± wnξn. • Thus, modulo some sign changes, w is the standard C-skew form on C2n. Lemma 9. Suppose ε = h + jσ is H-hermitian symmetric on a right H-space V . Then the first complex part h of ε is C-hermitian symmetric and the second complex part of ε is C-skew. Moreover, each determines the other by (4) h(x, y)=σ(x, yj) and σ(x, y)=−h(x, yj). Also (5) h(xj, yj)=h(x, y) and σ(xj, yj)=σ(x, y). • Conversely, given C-hermitian symmetric form h with h(xj, yj)=h(x, y),ifσ is determined by (4), then ε = h + jσ is H-hermitian symmetric. Also, given C-skew form σ with σ(xj, yj)=σ(x, y),ifh is determined by (4), then ε = h + iσ is C-hermitian. Proof. The identity ε(x, yj)=ε(x, y)j can be used to prove (4), while ε(xj, yj)= −jε(x, y)j can be used to prove (5). 6 Definition. Suppose (V,ε) is C-hermitian symmetric inner product space with signature p, q. Let GL(n, H) =EndH(V ), HU(p, q) =the subgroup of GL(V,H) fixing ε, U(2p, 2q) =the subgroup of GL(V,C) fixing the first complex part h of ε, Spin(V,C) =the subgroup of GL(V,C) fixing the second complex part σ of ε. Corollary 10. The intersection of any two of the three groups GL(n, H), Spin(n, C), and U(2p, 2q) is the group HU(p, q). • It is useful to construct the quaterionic structure from h and σ. • Suppose V is a complex 2n-dimensional vector space, h is a C-hermitian symmetric inner product on V , and σ is a complex sympletic inner product on V .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Math212a1403 the Spectral Theorem for Compact Self-Adjoint Operators
    Outline Review of last lecture. The Riesz representation theorem. Bessel's inequality. Self-adjoint transformations. Compact self-adjoint transformations. The spectral theorem for compact self-adjoint operators. Fourier's Fourier series. Math212a1403 The spectral theorem for compact self-adjoint operators. Shlomo Sternberg Sept. 9, 2014 Shlomo Sternberg Math212a1403 The spectral theorem for compact self-adjoint operators. Outline Review of last lecture. The Riesz representation theorem. Bessel's inequality. Self-adjoint transformations. Compact self-adjoint transformations. The spectral theorem for compact self-adjoint operators. Fourier's Fourier series. 1 Review of last lecture. 2 The Riesz representation theorem. 3 Bessel's inequality. 4 Self-adjoint transformations. Non-negative self-adjoint transformations. 5 Compact self-adjoint transformations. 6 The spectral theorem for compact self-adjoint operators. 7 Fourier's Fourier series. Proof by integration by parts. Shlomo Sternberg Math212a1403 The spectral theorem for compact self-adjoint operators. This w is characterized as being the unique element of M which minimizes kv − xk; x 2 M. The idea of the proof was to use the parallelogram law to conclude that if fxng is a sequence of elements of M such that kv − xnk approaches the greatest lower bound of kv − xk; x 2 M then fxng converges to the desired w, The map v 7! w is called orthogonal projection of H onto M and is denoted by πM . Outline Review of last lecture. The Riesz representation theorem. Bessel's inequality. Self-adjoint transformations. Compact self-adjoint transformations. The spectral theorem for compact self-adjoint operators. Fourier's Fourier series. Orthogonal projection onto a complete subspace.
    [Show full text]
  • Hilbert Spaces
    C H A P T E R 12 Hilbert Spaces The material to be presented in this chapter is essential for all advanced work in physics and analysis. We have attempted to present several relatively diffi- cult theorems in sufficient detail that they are readily understandable by readers with less background than normally might be required for such results. However, we assume that the reader is quite familiar with the contents of Appendices A and B, and we will frequently refer to results from these appendices. Essentially, this chapter serves as an introduction to the theory of infinite-dimensional vector spaces. Throughout this chapter we let E, F and G denote normed vector spaces over the real or complex number fields only. 12.1 MATHEMATICAL PRELIMINARIES This rather long first section presents the elementary properties of limits and continuous functions. While most of this material properly falls under the heading of analysis, we do not assume that the reader has already had such a course. However, if these topics are familiar, then the reader should briefly scan the theorems of this section now, and return only for details if and when it becomes necessary. For ease of reference, we briefly repeat some of our earlier definitions and results. By a norm on a vector space E, we mean a mapping ˜ ˜: E ‘ ® satis- fying: 619 620 HILBERT SPACES (N1) ˜u˜ ˘ 0 for every u ∞ E and ˜u˜ = 0 if and only if u = 0 (positive definiteness). (N2) ˜cu˜ = \c\ ˜u˜ for every u ∞ E and c ∞ F. (N3) ˜u + v˜ ¯ ˜u˜ + ˜v˜ (triangle inequality).
    [Show full text]
  • On the Kazhdan-Lusztig Polynomials for Affine Weyl Groups
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector ADVANCES IN MATHEMATICS 55, 103-130 (1985) On the Kazhdan-Lusztig Polynomials for Affine Weyl Groups SHIN-ICHI KATO * Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science. University of Tokyo, Hongo, Tokyo, 113 Japan In 191, Kazhdan and Lusztig associated to a Coxeter group W certain polynomials P,,, (y, w E W). In the case where W is a Weyl group, these polynomials (or their values at 1, P,,,,(l)) give multiplicities of irreducible constituents in the Jordan-Holder series of Verma modules for a complex semisimple Lie algebra corresponding to W (see [ 3,4]). Also, in the case where W is an affine Weyl group, it has been conjectured by Lusztig [lo] that these polynomials or their values P,,,(l) enter the character formula of irreducible rational representations for a semisimple algebraic group (corresponding to W) over an algebraically closed field of prime charac- teristic. The purpose of this paper is to give some formula (4.2, see also 4.10) concerning the Kazhdan-Lusztig polynomials P,,, for affine Weyl groups which appear in this Lusztig conjecture; namely P,,, for y, w “dominant.” (This is a generalization of the q-analogue of Kostant’s weight multiplicity formula in [8].) As a corollary of the formula, we shall show that the Lusztig conjecture above is consistent with the Steinberg tensor product theorem [ 15 1. To be more precise, let P be the weight lattice of a root system R (II) R ‘, a positive root system).
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Coherent Quantization
    Introduction to coherent quantization Arnold Neumaier Fakult¨at f¨ur Mathematik, Universit¨at Wien Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1, A-1090 Wien, Austria email: [email protected] WWW: http://www.mat.univie.ac.at/~neum Arash Ghaani Farashahi Department of Pure Mathematics, School of Mathematics Faculty of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Leeds Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom email: [email protected] email: [email protected] WWW: https://sites.google.com/site/ghaanifarashahi/ August 16, 2021 arXiv:1804.01400v2 Abstract. This paper is one of a series of papers on coherent spaces and their appli- cations, defined in the recent book ’Coherent Quantum Mechanics’ by the first author. The paper studies coherent quantization – the way operators in the quantum space of a coherent space can be studied in terms of objects defined directly on the coherent space. The results may be viewed as a generalization of geometric quantization, including the non-unitary case. Care has been taken to work with the weakest meaningful topology and to assume as little as possible about the spaces and groups involved. Unlike in geometric quantization, the groups are not assumed to be compact, locally compact, or finite-dimensional. This implies that the setting can be successfully applied to quantum field theory, where the groups involved satisfy none of these properties. The paper characterizes linear operators acting on the quantum space of a coherent space in terms of their coherent matrix elements. Coherent maps and associated symmetry groups for coherent spaces are introduced, and formulas are derived for the quantization arXiv:1804.01400v3 [math-ph] 16 Aug 2021 of coherent maps.
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Symmetric Operators and Applications
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 358, Number 3, Pages 1285–1315 S 0002-9947(05)03742-6 Article electronically published on May 26, 2005 COMPLEX SYMMETRIC OPERATORS AND APPLICATIONS STEPHAN RAMON GARCIA AND MIHAI PUTINAR Abstract. We study a few classes of Hilbert space operators whose matrix representations are complex symmetric with respect to a preferred orthonormal basis. The existence of this additional symmetry has notable implications and, in particular, it explains from a unifying point of view some classical results. We explore applications of this symmetry to Jordan canonical models, self- adjoint extensions of symmetric operators, rank-one unitary perturbations of the compressed shift, Darlington synthesis and matrix-valued inner functions, and free bounded analytic interpolation in the disk. 1. Introduction The simultaneous diagonalization and spectral analysis of two Hermitian forms goes back to the origins of Hilbert space theory and, in particular, to the spectral theorem for self-adjoint operators. Even today the language of forms is often used when dealing with unbounded operators (see [31, 43]). The similar theory for a Hermitian and a nondefinite sesquilinear form was motivated by the Hamiltonian mechanics of strings or continuous media models; from a mathematical point of view this theory leads to Hilbert spaces with a complex linear J-involution and the associated theory of J-unitary and J-contractive operators (see for instance [19, 31, 41]). Less studied, but not less important, is the simultaneous analysis of a pair consisting of a Hermitian form and a bilinear form; this framework has appeared quite early in function theory ([9, 48, 51]), functional analysis ([37]), and elasticity theory ([17]).
    [Show full text]
  • 5. SPINORS 5.1. Prologue. 5.2. Clifford Algebras and Their
    5. SPINORS 5.1. Prologue. 5.2. Clifford algebras and their representations. 5.3. Spin groups and spin representations. 5.4. Reality of spin modules. 5.5. Pairings and morphisms. 5.6. Image of the real spin group in the complex spin module. 5.7. Appendix: Some properties of the orthogonal groups. 5.1. Prologue. E. Cartan classified simple Lie algebras over C in his thesis in 1894, a classification that is nowadays done through the (Dynkin) diagrams. In 1913 he classified the irreducible finite dimensional representations of these algebras1. For any simple Lie algebra g Cartan's construction yields an irreducible representation canonically associated to each node of its diagram. These are the so-called fun- damental representations in terms of which all irreducible representations of g can be constructed using and subrepresentations. Indeed, if πj(1 j `) are the ⊗ ≤ ≤ fundamental representations and mj are integers 0, and if vj is the highest vector ≥ of πj, then the subrepresentation of m1 m` π = π⊗ ::: π⊗ 1 ⊗ ⊗ ` generated by m1 m` v = v⊗ ::: v⊗ 1 ⊗ ⊗ ` is irreducible with highest vector v, and every irreducible module is obtained in this manner uniquely. As is well-known, Harish-Chandra and Chevalley (independently) developed around 1950 a general method for obtaining the irreducible representa- tions without relying on case by case considerations as Cartan did. `+1 j If g = sl(` + 1) and V = C , then the fundamental module πj is Λ (V ), and all irreducible modules can be obtained by decomposing the tensor algebra over the 1 defining representation V . Similarly, for the symplectic Lie algebras, the decomposi- tion of the tensors over the defining representation gives all the irreducible modules.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Linear Operators in Banach Spaces
    (5) Appendix A Linear operators in Banach Spaces The goal of this appendix is to recall fundamental results on linear operators in Banach and Hilbert spaces; see, e.g., Aubin [15], Brezis [56], Lax [166], Rudin [206], Yosida [251], Zeidler [252] for further reading. The results collected in this appendix provide a theoretical framework for the mathematical analysis of the finite element method. A.1 Banach and Hilbert spaces To stay general, we consider complex vector spaces, i.e., vector spaces over the field C of complex numbers. The case of real vector spaces is recovered by replacing the field C by R, by removing the real part symbol ( ) and the complex conjugate symbol , and by interpreting the symbol asℜ the· absolute value instead of the modulus.· Some additional minor adaptations|·| (regarding duality and inner products) are indicated whenever relevant. A.1.1 Banach spaces Let V be a complex vector space. Definition A.1 (Norm). A norm on V is a map V : V [0, ) satisfy- ing the following three properties: k·k → ∞ (i) Definiteness: v =0 v =0. k kV ⇐⇒ (ii) 1-homogeneity: λv V = λ v V , for all λ C and all v V . (iii) Triangle inequality:k k v + |w|k k v + w ∈ , for all v, w∈ V . k kV ≤k kV k kV ∈ A seminorm on V is a map : V [0, ) satisfying only (ii) and (iii). |·|V → ∞ Definition A.2 (Banach space). Equip V with a norm V ; then V is called a Banach space if every Cauchy sequence (with respectk·k to the metric d(x, y)= x y ) in V has a limit in V .
    [Show full text]
  • Some New Directions in Teichmüller Theory
    Some New Directions in Teichmu¨ller Theory by Mark Greenfield A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Mathematics) in The University of Michigan 2021 Doctoral Committee: Professor Lizhen Ji, Chair Professor Christine Aidala Professor Richard Canary Associate Professor Sarah Koch Professor Ralf Spatzier Mark Greenfield [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7676-0557 c Mark Greenfield 2021 © All Rights Reserved ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I am grateful to my advisor, Lizhen Ji, for supporting me throughout my graduate career. He has introduced me to many different areas of mathematics, and always had confidence in my ability to make meaningful contri- butions. I would like to thank my doctoral committee for working with me through this process during a pandemic. I am indebted to many professors at the Univer- sity of Michigan, especially Sarah Koch and Richard Canary, for numerous helpful conversations. Dmitri Gekhtman deserves special mention, as Chapter V would not exist without our fruitful collaboration and friendship. I would like to acknowledge Bradley Zykoski for many fascinating mathematical and non-mathematical discus- sions over the years, and for providing helpful comments on early drafts of this thesis. There are numerous others who deserve to be listed here, but I hope a gen- eral expression of gratitude to the wonderful people in the department and beyond, including but not limited to my fellow graduate students, postdoctoral scholars, ad- ministrative staff, lecturers, friends from my undergraduate years, as well as my students, will suffice. Most of this work was completed while I was funded by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No.
    [Show full text]
  • Rigged Hilbert Space Theory for Hermitian and Quasi-Hermitian Observables
    Rigged Hilbert Space Theory for Hermitian and Quasi-Hermitian Observables Bachelor Thesis: Mathematics and Physics July 2019 Student: Lars van der Laan Faculty: University of Groningen FSE Primary Advisor Mathematics: Prof. A. Sterk Primary Advisor Physics: Prof. D. Boer Abstract In this thesis, we study whether the rigged Hilbert space formulation of Quantum Mechanics can be extended to quasi-hermitian operators. The necessary mathematics to understand rigged Hilbert spaces and their representations is presented. Using the mathematics, we give rigorous meaning to Dirac’s kets and bras, using the momentum operator as an example. The mathe- matical theory culminates with the nuclear spectral theorem(Gelfand-Maurin) which guarantees an eigenket decomposition for the wave functions. Next, we illustrate the theory by applying it to the quantum system defined by a potential barrier. We then introduce non-hermitian oper- ators of interest in Quantum Mechanics, specifically PT-symmetric Hamiltonians. It is known that PT-symmetric Hamiltonians are necessarily pseudo-hermitian. We restrict our attention to a subclass of pseudo-hermitian operators, the quasi-hermitian operators, and present an extension of the nuclear spectral theorem. The extension, under certain conditions on the quasi-hermitian operator and the metric operator, guarantees an eigenket decomposition for a dense subset of the Hilbert space on which the operator is defined. We discuss how the extension may help put quasi-hermitian quantum mechanics on a rigorous footing and discuss its drawbacks and possible extensions. Lastly, we present conditions under which a spectral decomposition of quasi-hermitian operators with respect to an operator-valued measure exists. This is an extension of the spectral decomposition of self-adjoint operators with respect to a projection-valued measure.
    [Show full text]
  • C –Algebras (A, K·Ka, ∗) and (B, K·Kb, ∗), We Want to Construct C∗–Norms on the Algebraic Tensor Product a ⊗ B
    C∗–Algebras Christian B¨ar1 and Christian Becker2 1 Institut f¨urMathematik, Universit¨atPotsdam, [email protected] 2 Institut f¨urMathematik, Universit¨atPotsdam, [email protected] In this chapter we will collect those basic concepts and facts related to C∗– algebras that will be needed later on. We give complete proofs. In Sections 1, 2, 3, and 6 we follow closely the presentation in [1]. For more information on C∗–algebras see e. g. [2, 4, 5, 7, 8]. 1 Basic definitions Definition 1. Let A be an associative C-algebra, let k · k be a norm on the C-vector space A, and let ∗ : A → A, a 7→ a∗, be a C-antilinear map. Then (A, k · k, ∗) is called a C∗–algebra, if (A, k · k) is complete and we have for all a, b ∈ A: 1. a∗∗ = a (∗ is an involution) 2. (ab)∗ = b∗a∗ 3. kabk ≤ kak kbk (submultiplicativity) 4. ka∗k = kak (∗ is an isometry) 5. ka∗ak = kak2 (C∗–property). A (not necessarily complete) norm on A satisfying conditions (1) to (5) is called a C∗–norm. Remark 1. Note that the Axioms 1–5 are not independent. For instance, Ax- iom 4 can easily be deduced from Axioms 1,3 and 5. Example 1. Let (H, (·, ·)) be a complex Hilbert space, let A = L(H) be the algebra of bounded operators on H. Let k · k be the operator norm, i. e., kak := sup kaxk. x∈H kxk=1 Let a∗ be the operator adjoint to a, i. e., 2 Christian B¨arand Christian Becker (ax, y) = (x, a∗y) for all x, y ∈ H.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Banach and Hilbert Spaces A.1 Banach Spaces
    Appendix A Banach and Hilbert spaces The goal of this appendix is to recall basic results on Banach and Hilbert (JLG) Sept 15 2019 spaces. To stay general, we consider complex vector spaces, i.e., vector spaces over the field C of complex numbers. The case of real vector spaces is recov- ered by replacing the field C by R, by removing the real part symbol ( ) and the complex conjugate symbol , and by interpreting the symbol ℜ as· the absolute value instead of the modulus.· |·| A.1 Banach spaces Let V be a complex vector space. Definition A.1 (Norm). A norm on V is a map V : V R+ := [0, ) satisfying the following three properties: k·k → ∞ (i) Definiteness: [ v = 0 ] [ v = 0 ]. k kV ⇐⇒ (ii) 1-homogeneity: λv V = λ v V for all λ C and all v V . (iii) Triangle inequality:k k v + |w|k k v + w∈ for all v, w∈ V . k kV ≤k kV k kV ∈ For every norm V : V R+ := [0, ), the function d(x, y) := x y V , for all x, y V ,k·k is a metric→ (or distance).∞ k − k ∈ Remark A.2 (Definiteness). Item (i) can be slightly relaxed by requiring only that [ v V = 0] = [ v = 0 ], since the 1-homogeneity implies that [ v =0]= k[ kv = 0 ]. ⇒ ⇒ k kV ⊓⊔ Definition A.3 (Seminorm). A seminorm on V is a map V : V R+ satisfying only the statements (ii) and (iii) above, i.e., 1-homogeneity|·| and→ the triangle inequality Definition A.4 (Banach space).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Yang-Mills Theory and a Superquadric
    1 Yang-Mills theory and a superquadric. Michael Movshev1 Institute for Advanced Study Einstein Dr 1, Princeton, NJ,USA [email protected] Dedicated to Yu.I. Manin on his 70-th birthday Summary. We construct a real-analytic CR supermanifold R, holomorphically em- bedded into a superquadric Q ⊂ P3j3 × P∗3j3. A CR distribution F on R enables • ¯ us to define a tangential CR complex (ΩF ; @). ¯ • We define a @-closed trace functional : ΩF ! ¡ and conjecture that a Chern- • ¯ Simons theory associated with a triple (ΩF ⊗ Matn; @; ) is equivalent to N=3, D=4 Yang-Mills theory with a gauge group U(n). We give some evidences to this conjecture. 1.1 Introduction Twistor methods in gauge theory have a long history (summarized in ref. [P90]). A common feature of these methods is that spacetime is replaced by a twistor (or ambitwistor) analytic manifold T . Equations of motion "emerge" (in terminology of Penrose) from complex geometry of T. The twistor approach turns to be a very useful technical innovation. For example difficult questions of classical gauge theory, e.g. the ones that appear in the theory of instantons, admit a translation into a considerably more simple questions of analytic geometry of space T. On this way classifications theorems in the theory of instantons has been obtained (see ref. [AHDM]). The quantum theory did not have a simple reformulation in the language of geometry of the space T so far. One of the reasons is that the quantum theory formulated formally in terms of a path integral requires a Lagrangian. Classical theory, as it was mentioned earlier, provides only equations of motion whose definition needs no metric.
    [Show full text]