ULI Advisory Services Program Report About the Advisory Services Program
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Federal Highway Administration Influence of Transportation Infrastructure on Land Use December 6–8, 2004 Washington, D.C. A ULI Advisory Services Workshop Report ULI–the Urban Land Institute 1025 Thomas Jefferson Street, N.W. Suite 500 West Washington, D.C. 20007-5201 About ULI–the Urban Land Institute LI–the Urban Land Institute is a non- sionals represented include developers, builders, profit research and education organization property owners, investors, architects, public offi- that promotes responsible leadership in cials, planners, real estate brokers, appraisers, U the use of land in order to enhance the attorneys, engineers, financiers, academicians, total environment. students, and librarians. ULI relies heavily on the experience of its members. It is through member The Institute maintains a membership represent- involvement and information resources that ULI ing a broad spectrum of interests and sponsors a has been able to set standards of excellence in de- wide variety of educational programs and forums velopment practice. The Institute has long been to encourage an open exchange of ideas and shar- recognized as one of America’s most respected ing of experience. ULI initiates research that and widely quoted sources of objective informa- anticipates emerging land use trends and issues tion on urban planning, growth, and development. and proposes creative solutions based on that research; provides advisory services; and pub- This Advisory Services workshop report is in- lishes a wide variety of materials to disseminate tended to further the objectives of the Institute information on land use and development. and to make authoritative information generally available to those seeking knowledge in the field Established in 1936, the Institute today has more of urban land use. than 26,000 members and associates from nearly 80 countries, representing the entire spectrum of Richard M. Rosan the land use and development disciplines. Profes- President ©2005 by ULI–the Urban Land Institute 1025 Thomas Jefferson Street, N.W. Suite 500 West Washington, D.C. 20007-5201 All rights reserved. Reproduction or use of the whole or any part of the contents without written permission of the copy- right holder is prohibited. 2 A ULI Advisory Services Program Report About the Advisory Services Program he goal of ULI’s Advisory Services Program ers, public officials, academicians, representatives is to bring the finest expertise in the real of financial institutions, and others. In fulfillment estate field to bear on complex land use plan- of the mission of the Urban Land Institute, this T ning and development projects, programs, Advisory Services program report is intended to and policies. Since 1947, this program has assem- provide objective advice that will promote the re- bled well over 400 ULI-member teams to help sponsible use of land to enhance the environment. sponsors find creative, practical solutions for issues such as downtown redevelopment, land management strategies, evaluation of develop- ULI Program Staff ment potential, growth management, community revitalization, brownfields redevelopment, military Rachelle L. Levitt base reuse, provision of low-cost and affordable Executive Vice President, Policy and Practice housing, and asset management strategies, among Mary Beth Corrigan other matters. A wide variety of public, private, and nonprofit organizations have contracted for Vice President, Advisory Services and ULI’s Advisory Services. Policy Programs Each panel team is composed of highly qualified Nancy Zivitz Sussman professionals who volunteer their time to ULI. Senior Associate, Advisory Services They are chosen for their knowledge of the panel Nicholas Gabel topic and screened to ensure their objectivity. ULI Associate, Advisory Services panel teams are interdisciplinary and are devel- oped based on the specific scope of the assignment. Jason Bell ULI teams provide a holistic look at development Panel Coordinator, Advisory Services problems. Each panel is chaired by a respected ULI member with previous panel experience. Yvonne Stanton Administrative Assistant The agenda for a panel assignment is intensive. It includes an in-depth briefing and meetings with Nancy H. Stewart sponsor representatives; discussions with key Director, Book Program people; and a day of formulating recommenda- tions. On the final day on site, the panel makes an Julie D. Stern oral presentation of its findings and conclusions to JDS Communications the sponsor. At the request of the sponsor, a writ- Manuscript Editor ten report is prepared and published. Betsy VanBuskirk Because the sponsoring entities are responsible Art Director for significant preparation before the panel’s visit, including sending extensive briefing materials to Martha Loomis each member, participants in ULI’s panel assign- Desktop Publishing Specialist/Graphics ments are able to make accurate assessments of a sponsor’s issues and to provide recommendations Craig Chapman in a compressed amount of time. Director, Publishing Operations A major strength of the program is ULI’s unique ability to draw on the knowledge and expertise of its members, including land developers and own- Washington, D.C., December 6–8, 2004 3 Contents ULI Panel and Project Staff 6 Introduction 7 How Development Decisions Are Made 9 How and When Transportation Projects Affect Local Land Use Decisions 12 Conclusion 15 About the Panel 16 Washington, D.C., December 6–8, 2004 5 ULI Panel and Project Staff Panel Chair Julia Trevarthen Director William R. Eager The Institute for Community Collaboration, Inc. President South Florida Regional Planning Council TDA, Inc. Hollywood, Florida Seattle, Washington Allan R. Winn Panel Members Managing Partner Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll, LLP Robert Dunphy Washington, D.C. Senior Resident Fellow, Transportation and Infrastructure ULI Project Director ULI–the Urban Land Institute Washington, D.C. Mary Beth Corrigan Vice President, Advisory Services and J. Kevin Lawler Policy Programs Managing Partner ULI–the Urban Land Institute N-K Ventures, LC Washington, D.C. West Palm Beach, Florida Joseph R. Molinaro ULI On-Site Coordinator Manager, Smart Growth Programs Jason Bell Community Outreach Department Panel and Workshop Coordinator National Association of Realtors® ULI–the Urban Land Institute Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C. Roger Platt Senior Vice President and Counsel The Real Estate Roundtable, Inc. Washington, D.C. Karina Ricks Urban Planner D.C. Office of Planning Washington, D.C. 6 A ULI Advisory Services Program Report Introduction he Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) bers with relevant expertise and experience in the and transportation planning agencies have implications of transportation decisions on land use been grappling with the correlation be- gathered in Washington, D.C., for two days to dis- T tween transportation and land use deci- cuss this issue with FHWA representatives. Panel sions. Often cited as the reason for suburban members represented both the public and private sprawl, roadway projects frequently are opposed sectors and included developers, local government by members of the general public, who assume officials, land use planners, transportation plan- that if roads are built, development will always ners, and environmental professionals. follow. The support for this assumption is most The purpose of the workshop was to facilitate dis- often anecdotal, and the FHWA does not believe cussions among public and private land use de- this is always true. Other factors, such as local cision makers and to promote a dialogue that will and regional land use and economic development allow the FHWA and transportation agencies to policies, also play an important role in suburban better understand the correlation between growth. However, this assumption also is based transportation planning and land use decisions. on anecdotal information. Hearing both public and private sector views on The Federal Highway Administration asked ULI this subject can help the FHWA and transporta- to convene a group of real estate and planning tion agencies become more aware of the impact professionals to provide a better understanding of transportation decisions on land use. of the correlations between the approval of trans- portation infrastructure projects and local land The questions addressed included the following: use patterns. In requesting the assistance of ULI, • What role does transportation planning play in the FHWA sought a better understanding of local government land use decisions? local land use decision making—as well as of the decision-making process that the private sector • What role does transportation planning play uses when deciding to develop a real estate for private development? project—so that the FHWA and transportation • How can transportation planning better corre- agencies can more logically discuss the correlations late with land use decisions and a community’s between transportation and land use when analyz- vision for the future, and how can land use de- ing projects. In addition, this understanding also cisions and a community’s vision be better cor- can help transportation agencies more effec- related? tively communicate to decision makers the role that transportation projects play in land use pat- FHWA officials met with the panel and provided terns and how local and regional governments an overview of the different programs and poli- can work with transportation agencies to achieve cies involved in the FHWA project approval