DOCSLIB.ORG

621 Olympic 651 Satsop 648 Wynoochee 642 Copalis 636 Skokomish 638 Quinault Ridge 618 Matheny 615 Clearwater

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
621 Olympic 651 Satsop 648 Wynoochee 642 Copalis 636 Skokomish 638 Quinault Ridge 618 Matheny 615 Clearwater 36 Queets River 36 T25-0N 31 T25-0N 36 Lake Dilly Noname Upper O'Neil T25-0N Ignar Hurst T25-0N R9-0W T25-0N Elip T25-0N R8-0W Creek Creek Creek 1 6 R11-0W R10-0W 36 31 T25-0N R7-0W Creek 1 R8-2W Creek Squaw T24-0N R10-2W Round Lake Creek Rustler Creek 36 T25-0N Queets River T24-2N R9-0W 1 Rhodes Creek R5-0W 615 East Fork T24-2N R10-0W T24-2N R8-0W T25-0N R6-0W Tacoma Phelan Creek T24-2N R10-0W Sams River Tshletshy Creek Wild Rose Creek Nine Creek 36 Stream 31 T24-2N R7-0W T24-2N R7-0W 36 31 Clearwater 36 Fire Creek T24-0N Eight Lilly Lake 6 O'Neil Creek Stream R12-0W North Fork Tacoma Quinault 1 6 T24-0N Creek Queets River Hook Branch Creek River R6-0W 1 Queets River Matheny Creek Big Creek Mud Creek Hammer Game Management Unit T24-0N R7-0W Creek Hibbard Creek 621 638 - Quinault Ridge 618 Smith Lake Irely Creek Graves Creek Success Creek T24-0N R10-0W T24-0N Matheny Seven Stream Olympic T24-0N T24-0N R8-0W T24-0N 36 R11-0W 36 31 Madeline 2021 - 2022Hunting 2021- Season R9-0W Fox Creek R5-0W 36 Creek 36 1 North Fork Salmon River WA Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) 6 Six Stream River North Fork Skokomish Aministrative Areas Middle Fork Salmon River Quinault River Harlow Howe Creek Salmon River Creek 1 Quinault Litchy Creek 2021-22 Game2021-22 Management Unit River 31 Quinault RiverCannings Creek 1 36 Wynoochee WDFWWildlife Area 6 31 1 River Canoe 31 31 Creek T23-0N 6 Kestner Creek 36 36 d[ River T23-0N 31 WDFWWater Acc essArea Trail Salmon Five Stream South Fork 6 1 Creek R10-2W Finley Creek Slate Swede 1 SnowfieldCreek Creek T23-0N Slide Creek Four Dry Creek Inner Creek 1 Creek 6 Stream R12-0W Quinault Merriman Creek 1 6 Higley Creek T23-0N R9-0W McKay Creek 1 6 Public Land Survey System Other Major Public Quinault River Bunch Lake Chikamin Creek T23-0N River TumbleCreek (Township and Range) Land Ownership North Fork Raft River T23-0N R11-0W ElkT23-0N Lake R8-0W T23-0N R5-0W Copper Copper Crane Creek Ziegler Creek R7-0W Creek Elk Creek Creek Dry Creek Tow nsh ipLine FederalForest - Servic e Gibson Creek Creek South Fork Chickamin Schofield Wilderness Haas Creek SectionLine Creek Cedar Creek Creek Steel Creek FederalForest - Servic e Milbourn Gatton Creek North Fork West Dry Creek Political Boundaries Boulder Creek Lake Quinault Clark Creek Branch Wynooch Rule Creek T23-0N R6-0W CountyLine FederalNational - Park Petes Creek West Branch Wynoochee River Raft River Lunch Creek O therFederal Land Quinault River Prairie Creek Eleanor State - DNRState - 36 Creek 31 ! South Fork Meadow 31! Falls Creek O therState Land 36 31 36 Creek Willaby 636 Church Creek Lebar Creek Skokomish Creek T23-0N ! Munic ipalLand Quinault River 31 River Ten O'Clock Creek 36 ! 1 R10-0W 36 6 Quinault River Trout Creek TribLand al 1 1 Boulder! Creek Skokomish 6 Fork Big Creek 6 T22-0N R10-0W Hydrography South Fork Raft River Hoh East Camp Creek ! Creek Pine Creek Pine 36 1 6 Beaver Creek ! Creek Pine Joe Creek 1 Middle Fork Transportation and AnnualRiv or er T22-0N ! 1 6 Wynochee Lake Big Creek 1 6 Lake Utility Network Stream R12-0W 6 Quinault ! 1 Camp T22-0N R9-0W 638 Scatter Creek River Hathaway Creek McCalla 1 Creek O'Took Creek ! IntermittentStream Creek Major Roads Chester Creek West Lebar ! Cedar Creek Creek Fork Big Pederson Lake, WideLake, Riv or er, ! Creek StateRoute Quinault Creek Cedar O c ean ! Creek LocRoad al T22-0N R11-0W Sixteen ! (Unim provto edPaved) Phillips Creek Creek Schafer Creek ! Ridge !! Transm issionLine ! Rock Creek Big Creek Walter Creek Chow Chow Creek ! Harris Creek Railroad North Name Creek ! T22-0N R8-0W T22-0N Cook Creek Skunk Creek Elk Creek ! R5-0W Mounts Creek Elk Creek ! Grouse Creek River ! Anderson Creek Railroad Creek East Fork Miles 36 31 Humptulips 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 36 31 ! Flatbottom Creek Nicklund Newbury Creek Cabin Creek ! Goforth Creek 36 Spoon Creek Creek 31 31 MiddleFork Satsop River ! Vee Creek T21-0N R12-0W 36 31 1 6 6 Rainbow 6 ! Creek Falls Creek 36 ! 1 31 36 Vance Creek 6 Canyon River T22-0N R6-0W ! ! 1 T22-0N R7-0W 36 1 6 1 6 T21-0N R9-0W 1 ! ! 6 Red Creek ! 1 ! 1 6 ! Donkey Creek RobertsonCreek ! 1 6 ! Larsen Creek T21-0N T21-0N R11-0W 1 Aristine ! ! R5-0W Creek ! T21-0N R8-0W 6 North Fork Lake Haven ! ! Wreck Creek Hall Creek Stevens Creek Baker Creek ! ! Aristine ! Creek North Fork Moclips River ! Wreck West Fork Satsop River ! Creek ! River Window T21-0N R6-0W ! West Fork Little River ! Humptulips Obrien Creek Creek ! Sources ofInformation – ! ! Save Creek T21-0N R7-0W Game Management Units 642 ! Jones Creek Bingham Creek ! WA Department of Fish andWildlife; Wildlife Prog ram(2020) T21-0N ! Rock Land Ow nersh ip ! R10-0W Creek R10-0W Creek ! Stevens WA Department of Natural Resources; Resource Mapping Section (2020) West Fork ! 36 Copalis ! 31 Politic and alSurvey Boundaries Webfoot Wishkah River ! !! WA Department of Natural Resources; Land Survey Section (2020) Halbert Creek 36 31 ! Creek ! Danny Walker Creek Transportation andUtilities ! 36 Furlough Creek 31 Rabbit Creek ! Moclips River 6 Dry Creek WA Department of Transportation (2017) ! ! 1 36 Aberdeen USGeolog ic Survey; al National Mapping Div ision(1989) Copalis River 31 36 31 T20-0N R12-0W 6 ! Reservoir Decker City Lim its ! 1 31 6 ! Creek 1 36 31 WA Department of Transportation (2011) ! 36 ! ! 1 ! ! ! 6 Hydrog raph y ! 6 Neil Creek ! Petersen Creek WA Department of Fish andWildlife, Fish Prog ram(2020) ! 1 6 ! ! 648 Parker Creek 1 6 Delorme Pub lish ingCom pany;Wash ing tonAtlas andGazetteer (2006) ! Edward Creek 1 6 ! ! Outlet Creek ! ! ! Brittain Creek 1 6 ! ! Joe Creek d[ T20-0N R6-0W DISCLAIMER ! ! d[ Wynoochee Nahwatzel Duetothe dynamic nature ofdata and the need torely on outside ! Lake[ ! d sourcesofinformation the Wash ing tonDepartment ofFish andWildlife ! c annotacc eptresponsib ilityfor errors or om issionsinthe dataand ! ! Beaver Creek ! ! Decker Creek informationcontained inthis produc There t. areno warranties that Dry Bed Creek ! ! acc om panythe maps andinformation contained inthis produc For t. ! T20-0N R9-0W Morrow ! ! T20-0N R8-0W Lake Schafer Creek legaldefinitions ofhunting regulations, seasons, andboundaries, the ! Outlet Creek East Fork Hoquiam River ! T20-0N T20-0N ! usersh ouldrefer toChapters thru220-410-01 of220-410-06the Ramey Creek ! T20-0N R10-0W ! Wynoochee River [ Halsea Creek 109 R11-0W ! d Wash ing tonAdministrativ Code e (http://ww w .leg.wa.gov ./wac/) Æ ! R11-0W · Elk Creek ! ! Coal ! ! River Wishkah ! Creek 651 ! ! Big Creek ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 36 ! 31 ! Big Creek ! ! T20-0N R7-0W ! ! 36Mopang Creek Boone Creek !d[ 31 ! Satsop ! ! ! Hansen Creek East Fork Fairchild Creek ! Wynoochee Satsop MapPub lishApril ed 2021 Boone ! Big Creek 36 31 Wishkah T19-0NBoone R12-0W 6 Singer Creek T20-0N R5-0W ! T20-0N R5-0W 1 Humptulips River West Fork Wishkah River River ! The Stillwater Creek T19-0N R11-0W 1 Big Creek 36 River 31 East Fork Wishkah River River Sources:Esri, USGS, NO Sources: AA, Esri, Garm USGS, in, NPS Creek ! T19-0N6 R10-0W 36 31 36 31 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 CLIMATE PLAN for the QUILEUTE TRIBE of the QUILEUTE RESERVATION La Push, Washington, 9/30/2016 Prepared by Katherine Krueger
    1 CLIMATE PLAN FOR THE QUILEUTE TRIBE OF THE QUILEUTE RESERVATION La Push, Washington, 9/30/2016 Prepared by Katherine Krueger, Quileute Natural Resources, B.S., M.S., J.D. in Performance of US EPA Grant Funds FYs 2015‐2016 TABLE of CONTENTS Preface 2 Executive Summary 4 Introduction to Geography and Governance 6 Risk Assessment 8 Scope of the Plan 10 Assessment of Resources and Threats, with Recommendations 14 Metadata and Tools 14 Sea Level Change 15 Terrestrial (Land) Environment 19 Fresh Water (Lakes, Rivers, Wetlands) 21 Marine Environment 32 Impact on Infrastructure/Facilities 46 Cultural Impacts 49 Appendix 50 Recommendations Summarized 50 Maps 52 Research to Correct the Planet 56 Hazard Work Sheets 57 Resources and Acknowledgements 59 2 Preface: It is important to understand the difference between weather and climate. Weather forecasts cover perhaps two weeks, and if extending into a season, a few months, or even a few years, but climate is weather over decades or even centuries. The National Academies of Sciences put on a slide show about this in March of 2016, in anticipation of their book to be published later this year entitled Next Generation Earth System Prediction. Researchers want to extend weather forecasting capacity, based on modeling, using vast accumulations of prior data, because weather affects so many aspects of our economy. So when we have a summer of unusual drought or a year of constant rain that extends all summer long, it is premature to call this climate change. But when we measure increases of global temperature averages over decades, or see planet‐wide loss of continental ice over decades, we can make statements about climate.
    [Show full text]
  • QIN Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report
    Quinault Indian Nation Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report Quinault Indian Nation Taholah, Washington March 2017 Quinault Indian Nation Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report Project Information Project: QIN Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report Prepared for: Quinault Indian Community Development and Planning Department Charles Warsinske, Planning Manager Carl Smith, Environmental Planner Jesse Cardenas, Project Manager American Community Enrichment Reviewing Agency Jurisdiction: Quinault Indian Nation, made possible by a grant from Administration for Native Americans (ANA) Project Representative Prepared by: SCJ Alliance 8730 Tallon Lane NE, Suite 200 SCJ Alliance teaming with AECOM Lacey, Washington 98516 360.352.1465 scjalliance.com Contact: Lisa Palazzi, PWS, CPSS Project Reference: SCJ #2328.01 QIN Shoreline Inventory and Characterization Report 03062107 March 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background and Purpose ........................................................................................... 1 1.2 Shoreline Analysis Areas (SAAs) Overview ................................................................. 3 1.3 Opportunities for Restoration .................................................................................... 4 2. Methodology .............................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Baseline Data
    [Show full text]
  • Case 2:70-Cv-09213-RSM Document 21063 Filed 07/09/15 Page 1 of 83
    Case 2:70-cv-09213-RSM Document 21063 Filed 07/09/15 Page 1 of 83 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al, No. C70-9213 10 Plaintiffs, Subproceeding No. 09-01 11 v. 12 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., AND MEMORANDUM ORDER 13 Defendants. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 This subproceeding is before the Court pursuant to the request of the Makah Indian Tribe (the 17 “Makah”) to determine the usual and accustomed fishing grounds (“U&A”) of the Quileute Indian 18 Tribe (the “Quileute”) and the Quinault Indian Nation (the “Quinault”), to the extent not specifically 19 determined by Judge Hugo Boldt in Final Decision # 1 of this case. The Court is specifically asked to 20 determine the western boundaries of the U&As of the Quileute and Quinault in the Pacific Ocean, as 21 22 well as the northern boundary of the Quileute’s U&A. A 23-day bench trial was held to adjudicate 23 these boundaries, after which the Court received extensive supplemental briefing by the Makah, 24 Quileute, Quinault, and numerous Interested Parties and took the matter under advisement. The Court 25 has considered the vast evidence presented at trial, the exhibits admitted into evidence, trial, post-trial, 26 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW - 1 Case 2:70-cv-09213-RSM Document 21063 Filed 07/09/15 Page 2 of 83 1 and supplemental briefs, proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, and the arguments of 2 counsel at trial and attendant hearings.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Fish Species in the Bogachiel, Dosewallips, and Quinault River Basins, Olympic National Park, Washington
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Inventory of Fish Species in the Bogachiel, Dosewallips, and Quinault River Basins, Olympic National Park, Washington Natural Resource Report NPS/NCCN/NRR—2015/955 ON THE COVER Top: (left) Federally threatened bull trout captured in Rustler Creek, North Fork Quinault River, Olympic National Park (OLYM) during fish inventory; (right) OLYM fisheries technicians conducting fish inventory via backpack electrofishing in Rustler Creek, North Fork Quinault River, OLYM. Middle: Upper Bogachiel River where OLYM fisheries crews inventoried 16 tributaries from June to August, 2002. Lower: (left) Sam Brenkman conducting snorkel survey in Dosewallips River, OLYM; (right) Rainbow trout captured in Big Creek, Quinault River, OLYM during fish inventory. Photo credits: Olympic National Park Files Inventory of Fish Species in the Bogachiel, Dosewallips, and Quinault River Basins, Olympic National Park, Washington Natural Resource Report NPS/NCCN/NRR—2015/955 Samuel J. Brenkman1, Stephen C. Corbett1, Scott H. Sebring1 1National Park Service Olympic National Park 600 East Park Avenue Port Angeles, Washington 98362 April 2015 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 State of Our Watersheds Report Queets – Chehalis Basins
    2016 State of Our Watersheds Report Queets – Chehalis Basins he evidence is abundantly clear. We know how Tto manage our fish. We understand sustain- ability. The problems fish are facing are not of our making. But we are definitely a big part of the solution, with the work we do in habitat res- toration and protection, good management and education. – FAWN SHARp, PRESIDENT QUINAULT INDIAN NATION Quinault Indian Nation The Quinault Indian Nation (QIN) consists of the Quinault and Queets tribes and descendants of five other coastal tribes: Quileute, Hoh, Che- halis, Chinook and Cowlitz. Quinault ancestors lived on a major physical and cultural dividing line. Beaches to the south are wide and sandy, while to the north, they are rugged and cliff- lined. Quinault people shared in the cultures of the people to the south as well as those to the Seattle north. Living in family groups in longhouses up and down the river, they were sustained by the land and by trade with neighboring tribes. Salmon runs, abundant sea mammals, wildlife and forests provided substantial material and spiritual wealth. A great store of knowledge about plants and their uses helped provide for the people. The western red-cedar, the “tree of life,” provided logs for canoes, bark for clothing, split boards for houses and more. The Quinault are the Canoe People, the people of the cedar tree. Tribal headquarters are located in Taholah, Washington. 190 Quinault Indian Nation Queets – Quinault – Chehalis Basins The Quinault Indian Nation’s Area of Interest for this report covers three Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIAs) includ- ing the Queets-Quinault basin (WRIA 21) and Chehalis basin (WRIAs 22 and 23).
    [Show full text]
  • Steelhead Washington: Chehalis, Hoh, Humptulips, Queets, Quillayute
    Steelhead Oncorhynchus mykiss ©Monterey Bay Aquarium Washington: Chehalis, Hoh, Humptulips, Queets, Quillayute, Quinault Rivers Gillnet, Midwater February 6, 2017 (updated April 6, 2017) Seafood Watch Consulting Researcher Disclaimer Seafood Watch® strives to have all Seafood Reports reviewed for accuracy and completeness by external scientists with expertise in ecology, fisheries science and aquaculture. Scientific review, however, does not constitute an endorsement of the Seafood Watch® program or its recommendations on the part of the reviewing scientists. Seafood Watch® is solely responsible for the conclusions reached in this report. Seafood Watch Standard used in this assessment: Standard for Fisheries vF2 Table of Contents About. Seafood. .Watch . 3. Guiding. .Principles . 4. Summary. 5. Final. Seafood. .Recommendations . 6. Introduction. 8. Assessment. 10. Criterion. 1:. .Impacts . on. the. species. .under . .assessment . .10 . Criterion. 2:. .Impacts . on. other. .species . .26 . Criterion. 3:. .Management . Effectiveness. .38 . Criterion. 4:. .Impacts . on. the. habitat. and. .ecosystem . .48 . Acknowledgements. 52. References. 53. Appendix. A:. Review. Schedule. 60. 2 About Seafood Watch Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch® program evaluates the ecological sustainability of wild-caught and farmed seafood commonly found in the United States marketplace. Seafood Watch® defines sustainable seafood as originating from sources, whether wild-caught or farmed, which can maintain or increase production in the long-term without jeopardizing the structure or function of affected ecosystems. Seafood Watch® makes its science-based recommendations available to the public in the form of regional pocket guides that can be downloaded from www.seafoodwatch.org. The program’s goals are to raise awareness of important ocean conservation issues and empower seafood consumers and businesses to make choices for healthy oceans.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonpoint Source Assessment Report FY 2009
    Quileute Tribe Nonpoint Source Assessment Report FY 2009 Prepared by Katie Krueger staff attorney/ geologist/grant writer for Quileute Natural Resources of the Quileute Tribe Table of Contents 1 Overview ………………………………………………………………………………….…….3 2 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………….....6 2.1 Background…………………………………………………………………………..6 2.2 Goal Statement…………………………………………………………………..….10 2.3 Objectives………………………………………………………………………..….10 3 Methodology………………………………………………………….…………………………..11 3.1 Data Sources………………………………………………………………………...11 3.2 Evaluation…………………………………………………………………………...11 3.3 Assumptions………………………………………………………………………….12 4 Land Use Summary………………………………………………….…………………………...12 4.1 Navigable Waters, NPSP sources on or off reservation…………….……………….…15 4.2 NPSP tributaries sources, Usual and Accustomed Area……………………………..…l7 4.3 Discussion of sources…………………………………………………………………….…18 5 Water Quality Summary of Conditions……………………………………………………..……18 5.1 Surface and Groundwater Quality Summary……………………………………….…….19 6 Water Quality Standards………………………………………………………………..……..…20 7 Water Quality Results………………………………………………………………………..…20 7.1 Tables and graphs of results……………………………………….………………………22 7.2 Programs for NPSP reduction……………………………….……………………………..25 7.3 Reservation NPSP Management Studies……………………………………………..……28 7.4 U&A NPSP Management Studies…………………………………………………….....…33 7.5 Tabular results of U&A Work……………………………………………………………….41 7.6 Legislative Impacts…………………………………………………………………………..44 8 Selection of BMPs ………………………………………………….…………………………...45 8.1 Government
    [Show full text]
  • Surveys to Determine Status of the Olympia
    SURVEYS TO DETERMINE THE STATUS OF THE OLYMPIA PEBBLESNAIL (FLUMINICOLA VIRENS) AND PACIFIC VERTIGO (VERTIGO ANDRUSIANA) ON THE OLYMPIC NATIONAL FOREST OF WASHINGTON FINAL REPORT FROM THE XERCES SOCIETY TO THE INTERAGENCY SPECIAL STATUS SENSITIVE SPECIES PROGRAM (ISSSSP) Assistance Agreement L13AC00102, Modification 3 Quinault River, Olympic National Forest. Photo by Candace Fallon/the Xerces Society. BY CANDACE FALLON AND EMILIE BLEVINS THE XERCES SOCIETY FOR INVERTEBRATE CONSERVATION FEBRUARY 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Fluminicola virens ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Vertigo andrusiana .................................................................................................................................................... 6 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................................ 6 Site Selection ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Extent of Anadromy in Bull Trout and Implications for Conservation of a Threatened Species
    North American Journal of Fisheries Management 25:1073±1081, 2005 q Copyright by the American Fisheries Society 2005 [Management Brief] DOI: 10.1577/M04-132.1 Extent of Anadromy in Bull Trout and Implications for Conservation of a Threatened Species SAMUEL J. BRENKMAN* AND STEPHEN C. CORBETT National Park Service, Olympic National Park, 600 East Park Avenue, Port Angeles, Washington 98362, USA Abstract.ÐThe use of radiotelemetry revealed that ulations that spend their entire life cycle in fresh- adult bull trout Salvelinus con¯uentus moved between water (Goetz 1989; Swanberg 1997). freshwater and the Paci®c Ocean and between water- One critical unanswered question is the extent sheds along coastal Washington. Forty-seven of 82 radio-tagged bull trout implanted in the Hoh River and to which bull trout move between freshwater and Kalaloch Creek basins were anadromous, and 23 ®sh marine environments. The extent of anadromy in were relocated in ®ve different estuaries up to 47 km bull trout remains uncertain primarily because ob- south of their tagging locations. Anadromous bull trout servations of native char have occurred in tidally typically entered the Hoh River from May to July, as- in¯uenced rivers in regions of overlap with the cended as far as 78 km upstream to spawning areas by closely related and morphologically similar Dolly September, and returned to the ocean to overwinter. This Varden, and the two species have not been distin- is the ®rst study to verify that anadromy is a primary life history form in coastal bull trout. The presence of guished during those observations (McPhail and anadromy and the irregular periods of freshwater, es- Baxter 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Quinault River Salmon Restoration NEPA Compliance; Environmental Assessment – FINAL
    7/19/2011 Upper Quinault River Salmon Habitat Restoration NEPA Compliance FINAL This National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance document, in the form of an Environmental Assessment (EA) addresses the restoration of salmon habitat of the Upper Quinault River located within the geologic floodplain of the Quinault River (coastal Washington State, in the west slope of the Olympic Mountains). This EA considers the preferred alternative of installing Engineered Logjams and restorative planting of conifer and hardwood trees to meet the goals of improving river processes and salmon habitat,habitat, especially for BluebackBlueback salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). This NEPA Compliance document has been prepared by the Quinault Indian Nation with the Bureau of Indian Affairs servingserving as the Lead Federal Agency Quinault Indian Nation | FINAL William E. Schlosser, William E. Armstrong, Birgit R. Schlosser Quinault Indian Nation Quinault Indian Nation 7/19/2011 2 Upper Quinault River Salmon Habitat Restoration NEPA Compliance Quinault Indian Nation | FINAL This Quinault Indian Nation Environmental Assessment is completed in cooperation with the Bureau of Indian Affairs for the fulfilment of National Environmental Policy Act requirements to implement salmon habitat restoration in the Upper Quinault River in Coastal Washington State of the Olympic Mountains. Quinault Indian Nation William E. (Bill) Armstrong, B.S. Salmon Resources Scientist, Department of Fisheries, Division of Natural Resources P.O. Box 189 1214 Aalis St. Building C Taholah, WA 98587 Planning services and document lead authorship provided by William E. (Dr. Bill) Schlosser, Ph.D. Kamiak Ridge, LLC 1515 NW Kenny Dr. Pullman, WA 99163 www.Resource-Analysis.com This planning effort has been completed with the consultation of a Planning Committee comprised of representatives of administrative Divisions from the Quinault Indian Nation, representatives from adjacent government agencies including the offices of Congressman Norm Dicks, Olympic National Forest, Olympic National Park, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Pet-Friendly Destinations
    Orcas Island Friday Harbor San Juan Lopez Vancouver Island Anacortes BC Island Island British Columbia THE OLYMPIC Tatoosh Victoria, B.C. 20 Island Neah Bay PENINSULA IS Cape Rd Vancouver, To Hobuck Beach MAKAH RESERVATION 112 Whidbey 5 DOG FRIENDLY! Shi Shi Sekiu Island Beach Clallam Bay 20 OLYMPICPENINSULA.ORG/ Ozette Rd OZETTE Strait of Juan de Fuca DOG-FRIENDLY RESERVATION Hoko- Salt Creek Dungeness Coupeville Spit 112 Loop LOWER ELWHA Port Joyce RESERVATION Port Dungeness Camano Sand Loop Townsend 113 Joyce Angeles Island Point Lake Piedmont East Ozette Beach 112 Hurricane Sequim 101 Gardiner Fairchild Port Lake Intl. Airport 101 Sol Duc Hot Sutherland 19 Hadlock Olympic Springs Rd Ridge Rd B Blyn e a National Forest Sol Duc River v Oak Bay Rd 525 Discovery e Clinton Sol Duc River 20 r JAMESTOWN Quillayute Rd Bay V 110 Sol Duc S’KLALLAM TRIBE a Mora Rd Forks l Port l e WITHIN OLYMPIC Hot Springs y Hurricane Ridge Rialto Beach R Ludlow d NATIONAL PARK La Push Rd Port Mukilteo La Push Bogachiel River Olympic Ludlow Rd Second Beach River Elwha QUILEUTE Hoh Rain Forest 101 Port Dungeness River Dungeness 104 RESERVATION National Forest Hoh River Center Rd Gamble Upper Hoh Rd Quilcene Edmonds Olympic National Park 104 101 Big Quilcene River 3 HOH Hood Canal Kingston Dosewallips Rd RESERVATION Olympic Poulsbo Dosewallips River Ruby Beach National Forest Queets River Brinnon 305 Pacific Duckabush River Bainbridge Clearwater River Silverdale Ocean Kalaloch Island OLYMPIC NATIONAL FOREST Hamma Hamma Rd SEATTLE All trails within the Olympic Hamma Hamma R. Quinault River Bremerton Lake Kitsap National forest are dog-friendly.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ozette Prairies of Olympic National Park: Their Former Indigenous Uses and Management
    The Ozette Prairies of Olympic National Park: Their Former Indigenous Uses and Management Final Report to Olympic National Park Port Angeles, Washington Winter 2009 M. Kat Anderson, Ph.D. National Plant Data Center, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Department of Plant Sciences 1035 Wickson Hall One Shields Ave. University of California Davis, California 95616 [email protected] Title Page Photo Caption Bog Cranberry (Vaccinium oxycoccos) Berries for food Makah women picking bog cranberries, circa 1936 (location unknown) Courtesy of the National Archives and Records Administration, Sandpoint. Seattle, Washington photographer unknown Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................................. ii List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................................. iv Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................................................................... v Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................1 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................................4 Ecological Features
    [Show full text]