4º Seminário De Relações Internacionais Da Associação Brasileira De Relações Internacionais (ABRI)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
4º Seminário de Relações Internacionais da Associação Brasileira de Relações Internacionais (ABRI) 27 a 28 de setembro de 2018 na UNILA – Foz do Iguaçu Área Temática: 05. Segurança Internacional, Estudos Estratégicos e Política de Defesa OS LIMITES DA SEGURANÇA INTERNACIONAL NAS FRONTEIRAS BRASILEIRAS Nome: Maurício Kenyatta Barros da Costa Doutorando CNPq pelo Instituto de Relações Internacionais da Universidade de Brasília, pesquisador do Grupo de Estudos e Pesquisa em Segurança Internacional da UnB (GEPSI-UnB) e, no momento de produção desse artigo, assistente de pesquisa no Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA). Resumo: Esse artigo busca rediscutir as percepções brasileiras de segurança internacional, tendo como base a perspectiva local. Nesse sentido, o local abordado será a fronteira brasileira, marginalizada no processo de desenvolvimento econômico e político do país, mas, historicamente, importante para a defesa da soberania da nação. Nesse sentido, nos basearemos no conceito e na prática de transnacionalidade aplicada às dinâmicas de segurança fronteiriça para contrastar os limites da agenda de segurança internacional brasileira, mas também das próprias abordagens centrais desse campo de estudos. Nos utilizaremos o método de “Process Tracing” para trabalhar com os dados obtidos. O artigo será organizado em três seções: 1) as abordagens centrais no campo da segurança internacional, a perspectiva brasileira e a abordagem local das fronteiras; 2) em que medida o local (da fronteira) é apropriado ou excluído das abordagens centrais e da brasileira; 3) a institucionalização de percepções de segurança e defesa na UNASUL: uma alternativa sul-americana e a concepção regional de local. Essa discussão nos permitirá verificar em que medida as abordagens centras da Segurança Internacional nos permitem lidar com os desafios securitários brasileiros e se nossa própria estratégia está adequada. A UNASUL será utilizada enquanto contraponto para o desenho de um panorama mais abrangente da segurança sul-americana com o intuito de iluminar novas possibilidades regionais, que incluam concepções locais, para os desafios securitários que afetam as fronteiras brasileiras e os demais países da região. Palavras-chave: Fronteira, Segurança Internacional, Brasil, Defesa. 1. BRAZILIAN STRATEGIC CULTURE: APPROPRIATIONS OF THE LOCAL The Brazilian Strategic Culture is formed by multiple features, some of them related to appropriations of local, which is possible to detect by tracing a genealogy of the idea of border in International Relations and correlated areas of knowledge production, encompassing theoretical approaches, concepts, ideas, designs and actions. A genealogy of border idea Border ideas in International Relations are multiple and diverse, going well beyond the simple delimitation between national spaces. We can say the transformations of the boundary concept follow not only the practical and cartographic developments, but also the evolution of multidisciplinary theoretical knowledge. Moreover, existing perceptions and classifications depends on the political thought or the analytic lens adopted, as well as on the historical context to which they refer (PAASI, 1996; HOUTUM, 2005; MORACZEWSKA, 2010). At the beginning, border notions were known as a front idea, a separation between two organized groups or communities, usually marking the preexisting cultural and civilizational differences. These delimitations were not fixed and were sustained by the force available in these communities to protect their lands. The front would be conformed from the line of defense punctuated of fortifications or walls directed to the protection of a certain collectivity, according to a defensive system against barbarians’ attacks (FURQUIM JUNIOR, 2007; FERRARI, 2014). From the emergence of modern structure of State and Nation-State, artificial boundaries or cartographically established limits gain relevance. In this case, border landmarks would be nailed to the ground with the intention of creating an imaginary line, with the practical effect of constitute a legal control line of a Nation-State. Borders are formally created by a long process of political and diplomatic negotiations aimed at pacifying the understanding of the end and the beginning of a political-territorial domain. Later territorial and political talks, a joint territorial demarcation commission is formed to place landmarks along the territory to determine borders. In a complementary way, diplomacy and national governments rely on the so-called natural border to refer to the existence of a vital space belonging to a nation, people or community, even before it was established and developed there. As Magnoli (1997, p.17) remembers, "natural boundaries anchor the nation in its own physical geographic reality making it prior to men and history." 1 In a border region, cities, populations and individuals are engulfed by dynamics of centrifugal and centripetal forces that establishes a biosocial interface. By representing both the resistance of state to assert its nationality and the plan of contact between different systems or sets of believes, where use to happen many original phenomena and the influence of "them" on "us", it creates social particularisms of inhabited border areas (RAFFESTIN, 1993, p.165-167; FERRARI, 2014; MACHADO, 1998, p.41-42; MACHADO, 2005, p. 260). Borders as an area of political action refers to a territorial portion of public power, where established authorities can implement programs and joint actions between nationalities and subnationalities and jurisdictions and domestic policies of each country are applied. Border strips include twin cities, which are linked by geographic proximity, and may or may not generate cultural and cooperative approaches (ALVES, 2015). Border as a link of regional integration absorbs processes of interdependence, regionalization and globalization, creating a zone of transnationality which is subject to a series of local and international influences that reconfigure this divided space. It is thus distinguished from the classical meaning of division between groups from the relation of identity / otherness and the classical conception of national territory. Border as an intersubjective space of interaction engender through social and cultural linkage a distinct identity, which reciprocally incorporate habits, customs, values and idiomatic expressions to people living in these areas, distinguishing them in a certain way from those ones in central cities of the country and approaching them by their proper way of interacting from those ones in the political community on the other side of the border, which allows the occurrence of true cross-border societies (SILVA, 2008; FARRET, 1997). Berta Becker (2006, p. 57) reminds us that each side of borderland has different cultural, social, economic, political and demographic structures, at the same time “places of instability and mutability, where reactions and conflicts of different natures can arise”, ranging from group and individual aspirations of local populations to external pressures. To think international relations locally is to acknowledge border as a symbol of social construction that acquires specific qualities (symbolic meanings) by dealing with imaginary, spiritual and immaterial flows and representations, concomitantly inclusive and exclusive in relation to shared values, habits and customs. Border as a locus of concern is filled with negative references in order to reach elites perceptions and collective mentalities. On one hand, it is seen as an inhospitable and empty place, a void of anarchy where incivility, violence and permissiveness reign. On the other hand, it marks the idea of nation established by a national ethos responsible in creating a universe of otherness. That is, a focus for the upsurge of nationalism, for the outbreak of xenophobic movements, of 2 subjection and prejudice against the other, the foreigner; environment of confrontation and conflict, survival of the state of nature, fragmentation and imprisonment. Indeed, borders could be seen as special places where turbulence does acts on the horizon of the global international society, spreading ideas, contaminating minds and influencing political agendas. In Badies’ words (2005, p. 12), “que tout le monde puisse aujourd’hui communiquer avec tout le monde tend à affaiblir les frontières ou, en tout cas, a les dotes d’une signification nouvelle”. The symbolic and the tangible meet themselves when borderlands turns into a permissive place for circulation of transnational illicit acts of all kinds, playing against regional stability and affecting agents resolve of ordering global international society. As Procopio (2000, p. 107) exemplifies, the "versatility of the narcotics trade" defines it as a global problem, but it is locally understandable by dealing with the dynamics of transnational organized crime and illegal crime in the Amazon. In the same way, border can be understood as a space of diversity denoting peculiar places, representative of a diversity of cultures, languages, creeds, habits, customs and values in general, defined by a mixture of racial and ethnic identities that engage and connect proper and unique dynamics of alliance and solidarity, of integration and approximation, which catalyze and sustain political conciliation movements. According to Adam Watson (2004, p. 480), "multi-ethnicity and multiculturalism are defining civilizational aspects, which can contribute to think of accepted