Sexually Transmitted Parasites and Sexual Selection in the Milkweed Leaf Beetle, Labidomera Cli7icollis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sexually Transmitted Parasites and Sexual Selection in the Milkweed Leaf Beetle, Labidomera Cli7icollis OIKOS 92: 91–100. Copenhagen 2001 Sexually transmitted parasites and sexual selection in the milkweed leaf beetle, Labidomera cli7icollis Patrick Abbot and Larry M. Dill Abbot, P. and Dill, L. M. 2001. Sexually transmitted parasites and sexual selection in the milkweed leaf beetle, Labidomera cli6icollis. – Oikos 92: 91–100. Milkweed leaf beetles (MLBs; Labidomera cli6icollis Chrysomelidae) are parasitized by a subelytral mite, Chrysomelobia labidomerae (Tarsonemina: Podapolipidae). We show that C. labidomerae is transmitted between MLBs when they copulate, and can reduce the survival of nutritionally stressed beetles. We investigated the effect of this sexually transmitted parasite on mate choice and male-male competition in MLBs, and the consequences of variation in these behaviours for mite transmission. We found no evidence of parasite avoidance by MLBs, and evidence for high rates of parasitism in the MLB populations we surveyed. In the absence of females, para- sitized males contacted unparasitized males more often and for longer than controls, and they tended to displace rival males from females more often than did unpara- sitized males, a result consistent with the interpretation that parasitized beetles compensate for loss of fitness by increasing reproductive effort. These changes can also benefit mites, because longer and possibly more contacts between beetles provide more opportunities for transmission, but there is no evidence that these changes in male behaviour result from parasite manipulation. P. Abbot and L. M. Dill, Beha6ioural Ecology Research Group, Dept of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser Uni6., Burnaby, BC, Canada V5A 1S6(present address of PA: Dept of Ecology and E6olutionary Biology, Uni6. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA [[email protected]]). Because they require close proximity between hosts for tion is how the effects of disease (or risk of disease) on transmission, infectious diseases can play decisive roles host interactions influence the population biology of in the sexual and social behaviour of their hosts. In the parasites themselves (Møller 1996, Knell 1999). For recent years both conceptual and empirical research example, from the perspective of a contagious parasite, have grown to incorporate the fact that infectious any host behaviours which alter the frequency of con- parasites, especially sexually transmitted parasites, may tacts between parasitized and unparasitized hosts can be common, if cryptic, factors shaping the mating reduce the rate of infectious spread through the host biology of many organisms (Loehle 1995, Lockhart et population, and potentially depress the growth rate of al. 1996). A number of studies have emphasized the the parasite population. For harmful parasites, such various effects of infectious diseases on both host sec- host behaviours may occur commonly: unparasitized ondary sexual characteristics (e.g., Knell 1999) and hosts may avoid parasitized mates, for example, or mate choice (e.g., Able 1996, Loehle 1997, Kiesecker et parasitized hosts may exhibit less competitive ability al. 1999), as well as the direct effects of parasitism on than unparasitized counterparts, reducing the frequency host competitive ability, life history trade-offs, and of direct interactions with other hosts (Loehle 1995, reproductive effort (e.g., Forbes 1991, 1993, Polak and Zuk and McKean 1996). Markow 1995, Thomas et al. 1999). An aspect of the Infectious parasites and their hosts thus can provide interaction that has received comparatively less atten- unique opportunities to explore reciprocal interactions Accepted 15 August 2000 Copyright © OIKOS 2001 ISSN 0030-1299 Printed in Ireland – all rights reserved OIKOS 92:1 (2001) 91 between host behaviour and parasite population biol- Baker and Eickwort (1975) reported an average of 11 ogy (Richner 1998, Clayton et al. 1999). Little empirical mites per beetle in the field, with laboratory densities evidence exists, however, that addresses the extent to ranging as high as 194 mites per beetle. Previous studies which an infectious disease influences host sexual be- have suggested that transmission occurs only by direct haviour, in conjunction with the extent to which those contact between adult beetles: before transmission, host sexual behaviours affect parasite transmission. adult female mites typically move from beneath the Here we consider the joint effects of mate choice and elytra to the abdomen of MLBs and migrate to new male-male competition on the transmission biology of a hosts either during copulation or occasionally during sexually transmitted parasite and simultaneously ask interactions between host individuals of the same sex how the parasites affect these same behaviours. (fighting, for example; Baker and Eickwort 1975, We investigated mate choice and male-male competi- Drummand et al. 1988). Results concerning how the tion for females in the milkweed leaf beetle (MLB) parasite affects survival have been more equivocal Labidomera cli6icollis, parasitized by the mite (Eickwort and Eickwort 1986, Drummand et al. 1989). Chrysomelobia labidomerae Eickwort (Acari: Tarsonem- We investigated sexual transmission by C. ina: Podapolipidae). MLBs occur on milkweed (Ascle- labidomerae and measured MLB survival under para- pias spp. and Cynanchum spp.) throughout the eastern sitism experimentally. We then asked if and how para- U.S. and Canada. Like many chrysomelid beetles, sitism influences the sexual behaviour of beetles by MLBs are characterized by multiple matings, prolonged measuring the effect of mites on mate choice and pairing between males and females, and mixed pater- male-male competition. In the mate choice experiments, nity broods (Dickinson 1986, 1988, 1992, 1997). MLBs we anticipated that unparasitized mates would avoid typically experience only one long season (May–Sep- infectious partners to minimize the likelihood of receiv- tember) favourable to reproduction, in which two or ing parasites (Able 1996, Loehle 1997). In the experi- three overlapping generations are produced. Males ments on male-male competition, the most competitively search for and monopolize females straight-forward expectation was that, because mites (‘scramble competition polygyny’; Dickinson 1992), of- feed on male haemolymph, parasitized males would be ten foregoing feeding to do so, and assure paternity by less competitive than their unparasitized counterparts guarding females until oviposition, and at times insemi- (Siva-Jothy and Plaistow 1999, Thomas et al. 1999). nating females repeatedly. Once a male encounters a However, the range of possible direct effects of para- female, there is little or no courtship before mating. sites on host behaviour extends beyond the pathologi- Male MLBs occasionally fight one another, normally cal, and includes functional changes that benefit hosts, when a solitary male attempts to displace a copulating parasites, or both (Moore and Gotelli 1990, Poulin et male, but fights sometimes occur in the absence of al. 1994, Lafferty 1999). In particular, we bore in mind females, possibly to evict rivals from plants. the possibility that male MLBs may express some de- The family Podapolipidae consists of highly special- gree of functional plasticity in competitive behaviour, ized insect parasites that feed on their hosts by piercing as a means to compensate for the loss of fitness due to the cuticle with their styliform chelicerae (Baker and parasitism (Forbes 1993). In order to identify such Eickwort 1975, Hurst et al. 1995). C. labidomerae is a plasticity (should it occur), we paid particular attention subelytral beetle parasite first described on New York to those effects that altered the outcome of competi- state MLBs (Eickwort 1975). C. labidomerae has since tion, because these are relevant to both parasitized male been described on Labidomera spp. throughout North fitness and to mite transmission opportunities. America, and morphologically-indistinguishable species Finally, after measuring the effect of the parasite on of mites have been described on Leptinotarsa spp. over MLBs, we asked if variation in parasite transmission is the same range. potentially correlated with the observed variation in Female C. labidomerae lay eggs on the wings of the host sexual behaviour, and if mite prevalence in a wild host, laying on average 1–2 eggs per day (Baker and population is consistent with the observed host Eickwort 1975, Drummand et al. 1988). Larvae mature behaviours. at the base of the wings or in the thoracic crevice, where they feed (Regenfuss 1972). The engorged nymphs then migrate to the ventral surface of the elytra, and develop into adults. Adult females overwin- Methods ter under the elytra of diapausing adult beetles, appar- Laboratory methods ently synchronizing their diapause to match that of their hosts (Baker and Eickwort 1975, Drummand et al. Approximately 250 milkweed leaf beetles were collected 1988). With no free-living stage, C. labidomerae cannot from the Queen’s University Biological Station at El- survive off their host for more than a few minutes to a gin, Ontario, Canada (44°34% N, 76°19% W), and from few hours, and mite numbers can grow quite large the Cornell Biological Field Station near Bridgeport, (Baker and Eickwort 1975, Drummand et al. 1989). New York, USA (43°09% N, 75°58% W). Asclepias and 92 OIKOS 92:1 (2001) beetles were locally abundant at both field sites. We To measure the effect of mites on starved beetles, we bred beetles from both populations in the laboratory, selected 36 two-month-old
Recommended publications
  • Growing a Wild NYC: a K-5 Urban Pollinator Curriculum Was Made Possible Through the Generous Support of Our Funders
    A K-5 URBAN POLLINATOR CURRICULUM Growing a Wild NYC LESSON 1: HABITAT HUNT The National Wildlife Federation Uniting all Americans to ensure wildlife thrive in a rapidly changing world Through educational programs focused on conservation and environmental knowledge, the National Wildlife Federation provides ways to create a lasting base of environmental literacy, stewardship, and problem-solving skills for today’s youth. Growing a Wild NYC: A K-5 Urban Pollinator Curriculum was made possible through the generous support of our funders: The Seth Sprague Educational and Charitable Foundation is a private foundation that supports the arts, housing, basic needs, the environment, and education including professional development and school-day enrichment programs operating in public schools. The Office of the New York State Attorney General and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation through the Greenpoint Community Environmental Fund. Written by Nina Salzman. Edited by Sarah Ward and Emily Fano. Designed by Leslie Kameny, Kameny Design. © 2020 National Wildlife Federation. Permission granted for non-commercial educational uses only. All rights reserved. September - January Lesson 1: Habitat Hunt Page 8 Lesson 2: What is a Pollinator? Page 20 Lesson 3: What is Pollination? Page 30 Lesson 4: Why Pollinators? Page 39 Lesson 5: Bee Survey Page 45 Lesson 6: Monarch Life Cycle Page 55 Lesson 7: Plants for Pollinators Page 67 Lesson 8: Flower to Seed Page 76 Lesson 9: Winter Survival Page 85 Lesson 10: Bee Homes Page 97 February
    [Show full text]
  • The Genome of the Colorado Potato Beetle, Leptinotarsa Decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Recent Work Title A model species for agricultural pest genomics: the genome of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8bt5g4s4 Journal Scientific reports, 8(1) ISSN 2045-2322 Authors Schoville, Sean D Chen, Yolanda H Andersson, Martin N et al. Publication Date 2018-01-31 DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-20154-1 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN A model species for agricultural pest genomics: the genome of the Colorado potato beetle, Received: 17 October 2017 Accepted: 13 January 2018 Leptinotarsa decemlineata Published: xx xx xxxx (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Sean D. Schoville 1, Yolanda H. Chen2, Martin N. Andersson3, Joshua B. Benoit4, Anita Bhandari5, Julia H. Bowsher6, Kristian Brevik2, Kaat Cappelle7, Mei-Ju M. Chen8, Anna K. Childers 9,10, Christopher Childers 8, Olivier Christiaens7, Justin Clements1, Elise M. Didion4, Elena N. Elpidina11, Patamarerk Engsontia12, Markus Friedrich13, Inmaculada García-Robles 14, Richard A. Gibbs15, Chandan Goswami16, Alessandro Grapputo 17, Kristina Gruden18, Marcin Grynberg19, Bernard Henrissat20,21,22, Emily C. Jennings 4, Jefery W. Jones13, Megha Kalsi23, Sher A. Khan24, Abhishek Kumar 25,26, Fei Li27, Vincent Lombard20,21, Xingzhou Ma27, Alexander Martynov 28, Nicholas J. Miller29, Robert F. Mitchell30, Monica Munoz-Torres31, Anna Muszewska19, Brenda Oppert32, Subba Reddy Palli 23, Kristen A. Panflio33,34, Yannick Pauchet 35, Lindsey C. Perkin32, Marko Petek18, Monica F. Poelchau8, Éric Record36, Joseph P. Rinehart10, Hugh M. Robertson37, Andrew J. Rosendale4, Victor M. Ruiz-Arroyo14, Guy Smagghe 7, Zsofa Szendrei38, Gregg W.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Chrysomelidae, Coleoptera)
    THE DONACIINAE, CRIOCERINAE, CLYTRINAE, - ~ CHLAMISINAE, EUMOLPINAE, AND CHRYSOMELINAE OF OKLAHOMA (CHRYSOMELIDAE, COLEOPTERA) by JAMES HENRY SHADDY \\ Bachelor of Science Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma Submitted to the faculty of the Graduate School of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE August, 1964 I OKLAHOMA lfAT&: UNNE.RSITf . LIBRARY JAN 8 lSGS THE DONACIINAE, CRIOCERINAE, CLYTRINAE, CHLAMISINAE, EUMOLPINAE, AND CHRYSOMELINAE OF OKLAHOMA (CHRYSOMELIDAE, COLEOPTERA) Thesis Approved: 570350 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ..... 1 REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE 3 SYSTEMATICS ... 4 LITERATURE CITED 45 ILLUSTRATIONS 47 INDEX • • • . 49 iii INTRODUCTION The leaf beetles form a conspicuous segment of the coleopterous fauna of Oklahoma. Because no taxonomic paper on the Chrysomelidae existed for the state, the present work with the subfamilies Donaciinae, Criocerinae, Clytrinae, Chlamisinae, Eumolpinae, and Chrysomelinae of the eleven subfamilies found in Oklahoma was inaugurated. The chrysomelids are a large family of small or medium-sized beetles. They are generally host specific and sometimes cause extensive damage to field crops and horticultural plants. However, the Donaciinae, Clytrinae, and Chlamisinae are of little economic interest. The economically important species belong to the Criocerinae, Eumolpinae, and·Chrysomelinae. The larvae and adults of these feed on the foliage of plants, except the larvae of Eumolpinae which are primarily rootfeeders. Included in this work are 29 genera contain- ing 59 species of which 54 species are known to occur in the state and five. species are likely to occur here. I wish to thank my major advisor, Dr. William A. Drew, for his encouragement, guidance and assistance, and the other committee members, Drs.
    [Show full text]
  • Timing of Metamorphosis in a Freshwater Crustacean: Comparison with Anuran Models Saran Twombly Ecology, Vol. 77, No. 6. (Sep., 1996), Pp
    Timing of Metamorphosis in a Freshwater Crustacean: Comparison with Anuran Models Saran Twombly Ecology, Vol. 77, No. 6. (Sep., 1996), pp. 1855-1866. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0012-9658%28199609%2977%3A6%3C1855%3ATOMIAF%3E2.0.CO%3B2-A Ecology is currently published by Ecological Society of America. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/esa.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org Thu Mar 6 10:36:17 2008 Ecology, 77(6), 1996, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Techniques in Colorado Potato Beetle (Leptinotarsa Decemlineata Say) Control and Resistance Management: History Review and Future Perspectives
    insects Review Modern Techniques in Colorado Potato Beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) Control and Resistance Management: History Review and Future Perspectives Martina Kadoi´cBalaško 1,* , Katarina M. Mikac 2 , Renata Bažok 1 and Darija Lemic 1 1 Department of Agricultural Zoology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Svetošimunska 25, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; [email protected] (R.B.); [email protected] (D.L.) 2 Centre for Sustainable Ecosystem Solutions, School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong 2522, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +385-1-239-3654 Received: 8 July 2020; Accepted: 22 August 2020; Published: 1 September 2020 Simple Summary: The Colorado potato beetle (CPB) is one of the most important potato pest worldwide. It is native to U.S. but during the 20th century it has dispersed through Europe, Asia and western China. It continues to expand in an east and southeast direction. Damages are caused by larvae and adults. Their feeding on potato plant leaves can cause complete defoliation and lead to a large yield loss. After the long period of using only chemical control measures, the emergence of resistance increased and some new and different methods come to the fore. The main focus of this review is on new approaches to the old CPB control problem. We describe the use of Bacillus thuringiensis and RNA interference (RNAi) as possible solutions for the future in CPB management. RNAi has proven successful in controlling many pests and shows great potential for CPB control. Better understanding of the mechanisms that affect efficiency will enable the development of this technology and boost potential of RNAi to become part of integrated plant protection in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Egg Cannibalism by Passion Vine Specialist Disonycha Chevrolat Beetles
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.15.005611; this version posted April 16, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 1 SCIENTIFIC NOTE 2 3 Egg cannibalism by passion vine specialist Disonycha Chevrolat beetles 4 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Alticini) 5 6 7 8 Colin R. Morrison1,2*, Wyatt Armstrong2, Lawrence Gilbert2 9 10 1 Graduate Program in Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, The University of Texas at Austin, 11 Austin, TX 78723 USA 12 2 Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78723 USA 13 14 15 16 17 * To whom correspondence should be addressed. 18 19 20 21 22 23 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.15.005611; this version posted April 16, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 2 24 Abstract 25 Cannibalistic behavior is now recognized to be an important component of nutritional ecology in 26 both carnivorous and herbivorous species, including many beetle families (Englert and Thomas 27 1970; Beaver 1974; Dickinson 1992; Bartlett 1987; Alabi et al. 2008). This habit was historically 28 viewed by an incidental outcome of unnaturally crowded laboratory situations with little 29 ecological importance (Fox 1975), but it is increasingly acknowledged that cannibalism 30 represents a potentially advantageous behavior (Richardson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Costa Rica
    Rev. Biol. Trop. 52(1): 77-83, 2004 www.ucr.ac.cr www.ots.ac.cr www.ots.duke.edu The genera of Chrysomelinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in Costa Rica R. Wills Flowers Center for Biological Control, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL 32307 USA; [email protected] Received 04-III-2003. Corrected 10-I-2004. Accepted 12-II-2004. Abstract: Keys in Spanish and English are given for the genera of Chrysomelinae known from Costa Rica. For each genus, a list of species compiled from collections in the University of Costa Rica, the National Biodiversity Institute, and the entomological literature is presented. The genus Planagetes Chevrolat 1843 is recorded for the first time from Central America, and the genus Leptinotarsa Stål 1858 is synonymized with Stilodes Chevrolat 1843. Key words: Chrysomelinae, keys, Planagetes, Stilodes, Leptinotarsa. Members of the subfamily Chrysomelinae Bechyné for Venezuela. To assist present and –popularly known in Costa Rica as “confites future workers studying this group, a modified con patas” (walking candies)– are among the version of their key for genera known to occur largest and most colorful representatives of the in Costa Rica is presented in English and family Chrysomelidae in Costa Rica. They are Spanish. This is followed by notes on the of broad ecological interest because of their diversity of the individual genera in Costa Rica host plant preferences and varying modes of with a list of both species identified in the col- life. Although readily noticed, there are no lections of the University of Costa Rica and the keys to the Neotropical fauna for identification National Biodiversity Institute (INBio) and of either species or genera, and many taxo- those recorded from Costa Rica in the catalogs nomic problems persist in this subfamily.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy, Biology and Host Plant of the Australian Leaf Beetle Stethomela Submetallica Baly (Coleóptera : Chrysomelidae) from T
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Mauritiana Jahr/Year: 2002 Band/Volume: 18_2002 Autor(en)/Author(s): Hawkeswood Trevor J., Takizawa H. Artikel/Article: Taxonomy, biology and host plant of the Australian leaf beetle Stethomela submetallica Baly (Coleóptera : Chrysomelidae) from the wet forests of north-eastern New South Wales, Australia, with descriptions of the egg, larva and adult 245-249 ©Mauritianum, Naturkundliches Museum Altenburg Mauritiana (Altenburg) 18 (2002) 2, S. 245-249 ■ ISSN 0233-173X Taxonomy, biology and host plant of the Australian leaf beetle Stethomela submetallica Baly (Coleóptera : Chrysomelidae) from the wet forests of north-eastern New South Wales, Australia, with descriptions of the egg, larva and adult With 1 figure Trevor J. Hawkeswood & H. Takizawa Abstract: The leaf beetle Stethomela submetallica Baly is described from larval and adult material collected by the first author from subtropical rainforest / wet sclerophyll forest in north-eastern New South Wales, Australia. The egg is also described. Adults and larvae feed on the young, fresh leaves of the small rainforest tree, Guilfoylia monostylis (Benth.) F. Muell. (Surianaceae). This plant has not been recorded previously as a host plant for any Australian chrysomelid beetle, no other Coleoptera are presently known from this plant and the family Surianaceae has not been recorded previously as a host family for the Chrysomelidae, either in Australia or elsewhere in the world. The larval morphology of S. submetallica indicates that the genus Stetho­ mela should be placed in the subtribe Chrysolinina Chen 1936 of the tribe Chrysomelini Reitter (subfamily Chrysomelinae).
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team Biological Control of Invasive
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States Roy Van Driesche Bernd Blossey Mark Hoddle Suzanne Lyon Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2002-04 Department of Service August 2002 Agriculture BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES Technical Coordinators Roy Van Driesche and Suzanne Lyon Department of Entomology, University of Massachusets, Amherst, MA Bernd Blossey Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY Mark Hoddle Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, USDA, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the authors of the individual chap- We would also like to thank the U.S. Depart- ters for their expertise in reviewing and summariz- ment of Agriculture–Forest Service, Forest Health ing the literature and providing current information Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West on biological control of the major invasive plants in Virginia, for providing funding for the preparation the Eastern United States. and printing of this publication. G. Keith Douce, David Moorhead, and Charles Additional copies of this publication can be or- Bargeron of the Bugwood Network, University of dered from the Bulletin Distribution Center, Uni- Georgia (Tifton, Ga.), managed and digitized the pho- versity of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, (413) tographs and illustrations used in this publication and 545-2717; or Mark Hoddle, Department of Entomol- produced the CD-ROM accompanying this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature on the Chrysomelidae from CHRYSOMELA Newsletter, Numbers 1-41 October 1979 Through April 2001 May 18, 2001 (Rev
    Literature on the Chrysomelidae From CHRYSOMELA Newsletter, numbers 1-41 October 1979 through April 2001 May 18, 2001 (rev. 1)—(2,635 citations) Terry N. Seeno, Editor The following citations appeared in the CHRYSOMELA process and rechecked for accuracy, the list undoubtedly newsletter beginning with the first issue published in 1979. contains errors. Revisions and additions are planned and will be numbered sequentially. Because the literature on leaf beetles is so expansive, these citations focus mainly on biosystematic references. They Adobe Acrobat® 4.0 was used to distill the list into a PDF were taken directly from the publication, reprint, or file, which is searchable using standard search procedures. author’s notes and not copied from other bibliographies. If you want to add to the literature in this bibliography, Even though great care was taken during the data entering please contact me. All contributors will be acknowledged. Abdullah, M. and A. Abdullah. 1968. Phyllobrotica decorata de Gratiana spadicea (Klug, 1829) (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, DuPortei, a new sub-species of the Galerucinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomel- Cassidinae) em condições de laboratório. Rev. Bras. Entomol. idae) with a review of the species of Phyllobrotica in the Lyman 30(1):105-113, 7 figs., 2 tabs. Museum Collection. Entomol. Mon. Mag. 104(1244-1246):4-9, 32 figs. Alegre, C. and E. Petitpierre. 1982. Chromosomal findings on eight Abdullah, M. and A. Abdullah. 1969. Abnormal elytra, wings and species of European Cryptocephalus. Experientia 38:774-775, 11 figs. other structures in a female Trirhabda virgata (Chrysomelidae) with a summary of similar teratological observations in the Coleoptera.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Site R107BY018MO Ponded Floodplain Marsh
    Natural Resources Conservation Service Ecological site R107BY018MO Ponded Floodplain Marsh Last updated: 5/21/2020 Accessed: 10/01/2021 General information Figure 1. Mapped extent Areas shown in blue indicate the maximum mapped extent of this ecological site. Other ecological sites likely occur within the highlighted areas. It is also possible for this ecological site to occur outside of highlighted areas if detailed soil survey has not been completed or recently updated. MLRA notes Major Land Resource Area (MLRA): 107B–Iowa and Missouri Deep Loess Hills The Iowa and Missouri Deep Loess Hills (MLRA 107B) includes the Missouri Alluvial Plain, Loess Hills, Southern Iowa Drift Plain, and Central Dissected Till Plains landform regions (Prior 1991; Nigh and Schroeder 2002). It spans four states (Iowa, 53 percent; Missouri, 32 percent; Nebraska, 12 percent; and Kansas 3 percent), encompassing over 14,000 square miles (Figure 1). The elevation ranges from approximately 1565 feet above sea level (ASL) on the highest ridges to about 600 feet ASL along the Missouri River near Glasgow in central Missouri. Local relief varies from 10 to 20 feet in the major river floodplains, to 50 to 100 feet in the dissected uplands, and loess bluffs of 200 to 300 feet along the Missouri River. Loess deposits cover most of the area, with deposits reaching a thickness of 65 to 200 feet in the Loess Hills and grading to about 20 feet in the eastern extent of the region. Pre-Illinoian till, deposited more than 500,000 years ago, lies beneath the loess and has experienced extensive erosion and dissection.
    [Show full text]
  • And False Potato Beetle, Leptinotarsa Juncta (Germar) (Insecta: Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)1 Richard L
    EENY146 Colorado Potato Beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say), and False Potato Beetle, Leptinotarsa juncta (Germar) (Insecta: Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)1 Richard L. Jacques Jr. and Thomas R. Fasulo2 Introduction 1863 to 1867, including the ten-striped spearman, ten-lined potato beetle, potato-bug, and new potato bug. Colorado True potato beetles are members of the genus Leptinotarsa, was not associated with the insect until Walsh (1865) stated with more than 40 species throughout North and South that two of his colleagues had seen large numbers of the America including at least 10 species found north of insect in the territory of Colorado feeding on buffalo-bur. Mexico. While most species north of Mexico are found in This convinced him that it was native to Colorado. It was the southwestern United States, two species are found either Riley (1867) who first used the combination Colorado in the eastern states or throughout most of the United potato beetle. States (Arnett 2002). The more notable of these two is the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say), which is a serious pest of potatoes and other solanaceous plants. The Colorado potato beetle was first discovered by Thomas Nuttal in 1811 and described in 1824 by Thomas Say from specimens collected in the Rocky Mountains on buffalo- bur, Solanum rostratum Ramur. The insect’s association with the potato plant, Solanum tuberosum (L.), was not known until about 1859 when it began destroying potato crops about 100 miles west of Omaha, Nebraska. The insect began its rapid spread eastward, reaching the Atlantic Coast by 1874. The evolution of the name Colorado potato beetle is Figure 1.
    [Show full text]