2Bakereickwort1975.Pdf PDF Document, 1.0 MB

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2Bakereickwort1975.Pdf PDF Document, 1.0 MB DEVELOPMENT AND BIONOMICS OF CHRYSOMELOBIA LABZDOMERAE (ACARI: TARSONEMINA; PODAPOLIPIDAE), A PARASITE OF THE MILKWEED LEAF BEETLE (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) THOMASC. BAKER^ and GEORGEC. EICKWORT Entomology Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York Abstract Can. Ent, 107: 627-638 (197.5) Adult females of Chrysomelobia labidomerae Eickwort lay eggs on the upper surfaces of the hind wings of Labidomera clivicollis (Kirby), The eggs hatch in approximately 7 days and male and female larvae feed at the base of the wings and in the meso-metathoracic crevice and swell to about twice their original length,,For about the second half of the approximately 7-day larval stadium, the larvae are inactive (pharate adults) and are usually cemented to the undersurfaces of the elytra, Inactive female larvae are accompanied by adult males that apparently copulate with the newly emerged adult females,, The pharate adult is enclosed in a cuticular sac that may represent a calyptostatic nymphal instar, Adult females feed on the beetle's abdominal terga and sometimes also occur on its venter where they do not feed., Females disperse from host to host when the beetles copulate. The species is anhenotokous. Mites overwinter on the diapausing adult beetles and do not infest the immature stages of their host. Even at high population levels, the mites do not noticeably affect the longevity or fecundity of their hosts,, Introduction Chrysomelobia labidomerae Eickwort is a common subelytral ectoparasite of adult milkweed leaf beetles, Labidomera clivicollis (Kirby) (Fig. I), in North America. Chrysomelobia exhibits many characteristics that are primitive for the Podapolipidae (Regenfuss 1968, 1973; Eickwort 1975) and knowledge of the biology of its species should aid in understanding the evolution of this family of highly specialized insect parasites. There are no previous published observations on living Chrysomelobia and prior to Eickwort (1975) the genus was known only from one museum specimen of its type-species, C. mahunkai Regenfuss, that was found under the elytra of a European leaf beetle, Chrysomela graminis Linnaeus (Regenfuss 1968). The majority of Podapolipidae, including all the more primitive genera, have been found under the elytra of beetles, especially Carabidae. Specialized podapolipids also occur on roaches, grasshoppers, and bumblebees, including a few species endoparasitic in the body cavity (Regenfuss 1968, p. 239), genital system (Stannard and Vaisham- payan 1971), and tracheal system (Husband and Sinha 1970). For an excellent summary of host relations and an evolutionary analysis, see Regenfuss (1973). Detailed observations on living podapolipids have only been conducted on the primitive genera Eutarsopolipus and Dorsipes, subelytral ectoparasites of carabid beetles (Regenfuss 1968, 1972, 1973), and on Locustacarus buchneri (Stammer), a tracheal system parasite of bumblebees (Husband and Sinha 1970). All podapolipids apparently obtain nourishment by puncturing the cuticle of their hosts with their styliform chelicerae and sucking hemolymph (Regenfuss 1973). Like nearly all members of the Tarsonemina, Podapolipidae have at most three developmental stages - egg, larva, and adult. The nymphal instars characteristic of more generalized acariform mites are usually lacking. We describe in this paper the development of C. labidomerae, its dispersal from host to host, its seasonal cycle, and aspects of its population biology and effect upon its host as determined from field-caught beetles and from laboratory rearings. All instars of this new species are described in a companion paper (Eickwort 1975). 'Present address: Entomology Department, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Geneva, N Y 14456 627 628 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST June 1975 FIGS 1--2 Labidomera clivicollis 1, dorsal view; 2, ventral view showing phoretic female Chr ysomelobia labidomerae Methods Our study of Chrysomelobia labidomerae extended from July 1969 to November 1972. Mites were reared on milkweed leaf beetles, Labidomera clivicollis, that were obtained from the laboratory population maintained by Dr. Kathleen Eickwort for her study on the beetle's ecology (Eickwort 1971). Studies were initiated at the E. N. Huyck Preserve in the summer of 1969 by G.C.E. on beetles and mites obtained from Albany, N.Y. and were continued at Cornell University by T.C.B . with additional beetles and mites from the Cayuga Lake region of New York. Approximately 100 mite-infested beetles yielded data in the laboratory. Beetles were reared following the techniques of Eickwort (1971). They were maintained in 12-cm-diameter, clear plastic, covered petri dishes. Filter paper lined the bottom of each dish. The beetles were fed milkweed (Asclepias syriaca L.) leaf halves at 2- to 3-day intervals, at which times deionized water was squirted onto the filter paper. In the winter, frozen milkweed was used. Since frozen milkweed quickly became infested with fungus, a fungicidal agent, Tegosept M, was dissolved in the water to help retard a mold growth. Eggs laid by the beetles were placed on leaves in separate petri dishes where eclosion of larvae and development to the final instar occurred. These fully developed larvae were then placed in dirt-filled dishes where they burrowed, pupated, and emerged as adults. To examine the mites, the elytra and hind wings of the host beetle were raised and impaled to a cork with number 0 insect pins to expose the abdominal terga (Fig. 3). Observations were made under a stereo microscope with a water-filter placed between the lamp and beetle to minimize desiccation. When a beetle was examined more than once, pinning holes in the elytra were reused so that injury to the beetle was minimized. Mites were transferred from one beetle to another with a damp camel's-hair brush or a curved minuten-nadel probe. On some beetles the mites formed large stock cultures of from 10 to 50 adults per beetle. Beetles bearing stock cultures or awaiting infestation were usually kept in groups of two to seven beetles per dish; those beetles used Volume 107 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST 629 experimentally were maintained individually or in pairs. A 16:8 1ight:dark photoperiod was maintained during the winter to retard ovarian diapause in the beetles, allowing 8 reproduction throughout the year, although at a lower rate in winter. The beetles were reared at room temperature. Length of stadia and oviposition rate were determined by transferring single adult female mites onto previously uninfested beetles and recording mite eggs at 1- to 3-day intervals. These females were removed before their first eggs hatched, and the subsequent eclosion (noted by the disappearance of intact eggs) and development of larvae recorded. Observations were terminated when all mites had emerged as adults or when the beetles were damaged or killed by the observational procedure. The effects of heavy infestations upon the beetles and maximum population levels of mite colonies were investigated by infesting beetles with one or two adult female mites and foregoing observations until the colonies were at least 25 days old. To determine dispersal, an infested male or female beetle was paired with an uninfested beetle of the same or opposite sex in a petri dish, and the uninfested beetle was examined at 1- to 3-day intervals. The longevity and fecundity of a single female mite was determined by placing her alone on a beetle and removing and counting her eggs until the mite died. Parthenogenetic development was investigated by transferring young larvae to the meso-metathoracic crevices of beetles and allowing the mites to develop into adult females. The sex of the mites developing from eggs laid by these females was recorded. Pinned specimens of L. clivicollis in the Cornell University insect collection were relaxed and examined for mites to obtain distributional data and infestation rates. Mites were mounted on slides following the techniques of Eickwort (1975). Alcohol- preserved specimens and slide-mounted representatives of all instars are deposited in the Cornell University insect collection. Life Cycle of Host The following account of the life cycle of Labidomera clivicollis (Fig. 1) In central New York is summarized from Eickwort (1 97 1). Adult beetles are first encountered as early as 15 May, when the first sprouts of their food plant, milkweed (Asdepias), are appearing. Eggs are laid on the undersides of milkweed leaves. While the beetles FIGS 3-4 Chrysomelobia labidomerae on Labidomera clivicollis 3, beetle with wings raised to expose adult female mites on abdominal terga and eggs on hind wing; 4, scanning electron micragtaph of eggs on hind wing 630 THE CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST June 1975 develop equally well in the laboratory on the five species of milkweed tested by Eickwort (1971), they prefer to oviposit on swamp milkweed (A. incarnata L.), their most common host in nature. The eggs hatch in 5 to 9 days and the larvae commence feeding on the milkweed leaves after consuming their chorions. The fourth instar larvae leave the food plants and burrow 3 to 5 cm into the soil, where they become inactive prepupae for about a week. The prepupae then ecdyse to expose the pupae, whose stadium lasts about 2 weeks more. The emerging adults leave the soil and feed on milkweed for a week or more before ovipositing. Adults live several months and the generations overlap. Second (and possibly third) generation adults enter diapause in the soil or other protected locations in the fall; the latest collection date for active adults is 9 October. Life History of Mite The life cycle of Chrysomelobia labidomerae consists of an egg stage, active and inactive larval stages, and adult. Eggs are first laid by the adult female in a single layer on the upper surface of the hind wings of the beetle between the cubitus and second anal vein (Fig. 5). After this area is filled, eggs are also deposited between the radius and cubitus as well as between the second and third anal veins and on the underside of the wings.
Recommended publications
  • Growing a Wild NYC: a K-5 Urban Pollinator Curriculum Was Made Possible Through the Generous Support of Our Funders
    A K-5 URBAN POLLINATOR CURRICULUM Growing a Wild NYC LESSON 1: HABITAT HUNT The National Wildlife Federation Uniting all Americans to ensure wildlife thrive in a rapidly changing world Through educational programs focused on conservation and environmental knowledge, the National Wildlife Federation provides ways to create a lasting base of environmental literacy, stewardship, and problem-solving skills for today’s youth. Growing a Wild NYC: A K-5 Urban Pollinator Curriculum was made possible through the generous support of our funders: The Seth Sprague Educational and Charitable Foundation is a private foundation that supports the arts, housing, basic needs, the environment, and education including professional development and school-day enrichment programs operating in public schools. The Office of the New York State Attorney General and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation through the Greenpoint Community Environmental Fund. Written by Nina Salzman. Edited by Sarah Ward and Emily Fano. Designed by Leslie Kameny, Kameny Design. © 2020 National Wildlife Federation. Permission granted for non-commercial educational uses only. All rights reserved. September - January Lesson 1: Habitat Hunt Page 8 Lesson 2: What is a Pollinator? Page 20 Lesson 3: What is Pollination? Page 30 Lesson 4: Why Pollinators? Page 39 Lesson 5: Bee Survey Page 45 Lesson 6: Monarch Life Cycle Page 55 Lesson 7: Plants for Pollinators Page 67 Lesson 8: Flower to Seed Page 76 Lesson 9: Winter Survival Page 85 Lesson 10: Bee Homes Page 97 February
    [Show full text]
  • Timing of Metamorphosis in a Freshwater Crustacean: Comparison with Anuran Models Saran Twombly Ecology, Vol. 77, No. 6. (Sep., 1996), Pp
    Timing of Metamorphosis in a Freshwater Crustacean: Comparison with Anuran Models Saran Twombly Ecology, Vol. 77, No. 6. (Sep., 1996), pp. 1855-1866. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0012-9658%28199609%2977%3A6%3C1855%3ATOMIAF%3E2.0.CO%3B2-A Ecology is currently published by Ecological Society of America. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/esa.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org Thu Mar 6 10:36:17 2008 Ecology, 77(6), 1996, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Egg Cannibalism by Passion Vine Specialist Disonycha Chevrolat Beetles
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.15.005611; this version posted April 16, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 1 SCIENTIFIC NOTE 2 3 Egg cannibalism by passion vine specialist Disonycha Chevrolat beetles 4 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Alticini) 5 6 7 8 Colin R. Morrison1,2*, Wyatt Armstrong2, Lawrence Gilbert2 9 10 1 Graduate Program in Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, The University of Texas at Austin, 11 Austin, TX 78723 USA 12 2 Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78723 USA 13 14 15 16 17 * To whom correspondence should be addressed. 18 19 20 21 22 23 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.15.005611; this version posted April 16, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 2 24 Abstract 25 Cannibalistic behavior is now recognized to be an important component of nutritional ecology in 26 both carnivorous and herbivorous species, including many beetle families (Englert and Thomas 27 1970; Beaver 1974; Dickinson 1992; Bartlett 1987; Alabi et al. 2008). This habit was historically 28 viewed by an incidental outcome of unnaturally crowded laboratory situations with little 29 ecological importance (Fox 1975), but it is increasingly acknowledged that cannibalism 30 represents a potentially advantageous behavior (Richardson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team Biological Control of Invasive
    Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Biological Control Biological Control of Invasive Plants in the Eastern United States Roy Van Driesche Bernd Blossey Mark Hoddle Suzanne Lyon Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team—Morgantown, West Virginia United States Forest FHTET-2002-04 Department of Service August 2002 Agriculture BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES Technical Coordinators Roy Van Driesche and Suzanne Lyon Department of Entomology, University of Massachusets, Amherst, MA Bernd Blossey Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY Mark Hoddle Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA Richard Reardon Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, USDA, Forest Service, Morgantown, WV USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We thank the authors of the individual chap- We would also like to thank the U.S. Depart- ters for their expertise in reviewing and summariz- ment of Agriculture–Forest Service, Forest Health ing the literature and providing current information Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West on biological control of the major invasive plants in Virginia, for providing funding for the preparation the Eastern United States. and printing of this publication. G. Keith Douce, David Moorhead, and Charles Additional copies of this publication can be or- Bargeron of the Bugwood Network, University of dered from the Bulletin Distribution Center, Uni- Georgia (Tifton, Ga.), managed and digitized the pho- versity of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, (413) tographs and illustrations used in this publication and 545-2717; or Mark Hoddle, Department of Entomol- produced the CD-ROM accompanying this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature on the Chrysomelidae from CHRYSOMELA Newsletter, Numbers 1-41 October 1979 Through April 2001 May 18, 2001 (Rev
    Literature on the Chrysomelidae From CHRYSOMELA Newsletter, numbers 1-41 October 1979 through April 2001 May 18, 2001 (rev. 1)—(2,635 citations) Terry N. Seeno, Editor The following citations appeared in the CHRYSOMELA process and rechecked for accuracy, the list undoubtedly newsletter beginning with the first issue published in 1979. contains errors. Revisions and additions are planned and will be numbered sequentially. Because the literature on leaf beetles is so expansive, these citations focus mainly on biosystematic references. They Adobe Acrobat® 4.0 was used to distill the list into a PDF were taken directly from the publication, reprint, or file, which is searchable using standard search procedures. author’s notes and not copied from other bibliographies. If you want to add to the literature in this bibliography, Even though great care was taken during the data entering please contact me. All contributors will be acknowledged. Abdullah, M. and A. Abdullah. 1968. Phyllobrotica decorata de Gratiana spadicea (Klug, 1829) (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, DuPortei, a new sub-species of the Galerucinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomel- Cassidinae) em condições de laboratório. Rev. Bras. Entomol. idae) with a review of the species of Phyllobrotica in the Lyman 30(1):105-113, 7 figs., 2 tabs. Museum Collection. Entomol. Mon. Mag. 104(1244-1246):4-9, 32 figs. Alegre, C. and E. Petitpierre. 1982. Chromosomal findings on eight Abdullah, M. and A. Abdullah. 1969. Abnormal elytra, wings and species of European Cryptocephalus. Experientia 38:774-775, 11 figs. other structures in a female Trirhabda virgata (Chrysomelidae) with a summary of similar teratological observations in the Coleoptera.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of an Organism: Common Milkweed
    THE STORY OF AN ORGANISM: COMMON MILKWEED Craig Holdrege All I am saying is that there is also drama in every bush, if you can see it. When enough men know this, we need fear no indifference to the welfare of bushes, or birds, or soil, or trees. We shall then have no need of the word “conservation,” for we shall have the thing itself. Aldo Leopold (1999, p. 172) I had casually observed common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca, Asclepiadaceae) but never paid too much attention to it. True, I was fascinated by its big globes of flowers and, in the fall, by its beautiful seeds that floated through the air on their tufts of white silk. I also knew that common milkweed is the main food plant for monarch butterfly larvae. But it was only when I was preparing for the 2006 summer course at The Nature Institute and when I noticed the flowers of common milkweed beginning to open, that I looked closely at them for the first time. I realized that the plant has a highly complex flower structure and, in addition, observed how the flowers were being visited by many different insects. Milkweed had finally caught my attention, and I decided that we should focus on it for our initial plant study in that weeklong course. This study proved to be particularly intense. Milkweed drew us all into its world of refined structures. It took us a good while just to get clear about the flower parts and their relation to more “normal” flowers. (There were a number of trained biologists in the course.) We also observed interaction with insects and saw how flies sometimes became caught in the flowers and died.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Chrysomela from 1979 to 2003 Newsletters 1 Through 42
    Literature on the Chrysomelidae From CHRYSOMELA Newsletter, numbers 1-42 October 1979 through June 2003 (2,852 citations) Terry N. Seeno, Past Editor The following citations appeared in the CHRYSOMELA process and rechecked for accuracy, the list undoubtedly newsletter beginning with the first issue published in 1979. contains errors. Revisions will be numbered sequentially. Because the literature on leaf beetles is so expansive, Adobe InDesign 2.0 was used to prepare and distill these citations focus mainly on biosystematic references. the list into a PDF file, which is searchable using standard They were taken directly from the publication, reprint, or search procedures. If you want to add to the literature in author’s notes and not copied from other bibliographies. this bibliography, please contact the newsletter editor. All Even though great care was taken during the data entering contributors will be acknowledged. Abdullah, M. and A. Abdullah. 1968. Phyllobrotica decorata DuPortei, Cassidinae) em condições de laboratório. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 30(1): a new sub-species of the Galerucinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) with 105-113, 7 figs., 2 tabs. a review of the species of Phyllobrotica in the Lyman Museum Collec- tion. Entomol. Mon. Mag. 104(1244-1246):4-9, 32 figs. Alegre, C. and E. Petitpierre. 1982. Chromosomal findings on eight species of European Cryptocephalus. Experientia 38:774-775, 11 figs. Abdullah, M. and A. Abdullah. 1969. Abnormal elytra, wings and other structures in a female Trirhabda virgata (Chrysomelidae) with a Alegre, C. and E. Petitpierre. 1984. Karyotypic Analyses in Four summary of similar teratological observations in the Coleoptera. Dtsch. Species of Hispinae (Col.: Chrysomelidae).
    [Show full text]
  • Science Journals
    RESEARCH ARTICLE EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY 2016 © The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. Distributed Darwinian sex roles confirmed across the under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC). animal kingdom 10.1126/sciadv.1500983 Tim Janicke,1* Ines K. Häderer,2 Marc J. Lajeunesse,3 Nils Anthes2 Since Darwin’s conception of sexual selection theory, scientists have struggled to identify the evolutionary forces underlying the pervasive differences between male and female behavior, morphology, and physiology. The Darwin- Bateman paradigm predicts that anisogamy imposes stronger sexual selection on males, which, in turn, drives the evolution of conventional sex roles in terms of female-biased parental care and male-biased sexual dimorphism. Al- though this paradigm forms the cornerstone of modern sexual selection theory, it still remains untested across the animal tree of life. This lack of evidence has promoted the rise of alternative hypotheses arguing that sex differences are entirely driven by environmental factors or chance. We demonstrate that, across the animal kingdom, sexual Downloaded from selection, as captured by standard Bateman metrics, is indeed stronger in males than in females and that it is evolution- arily tied to sex biases in parental care and sexual dimorphism. Our findings provide the first comprehensive evidence that Darwin’s concept of conventional sex roles is accurate and refute recent criticism of sexual selection theory. INTRODUCTION (usually the female) becomes a limiting resource for the less caring Understanding the numerous behavioral, morphological, and physio- sex (usually the male) so that the latter competes for access to the http://advances.sciencemag.org/ logical differences between the sexes constitutes a central theme in many former (10).
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking List
    Tracked Taxa List: Current as of Invertebrates 2021-May-17 This list contains the tracked invertebrate animal taxa known by the Saskatchewan Conservation Data Centre (SKCDC) to occur within Saskatchewan, as of the date provided above. If you notice any errors or omissions, please contact [email protected]. For more information about how the SKCDC generates these lists and what determines when a species is tracked by the SKCDC, visit: http://biodiversity.sk.ca/lists.htm Conservation ranks/status are provided for each species. For details on each, refer to the following resources: ◦ Subnational (S), National (N) and Global (G) Ranks: www.biodiversity.sk.ca/ranking.htm ◦ Government of Saskatchewan Wild Species at Risk Regulations: https://publications.saskatchewan.ca/#/products/1609 ◦ COSEWIC: https://www.cosewic.ca/index.php ◦ SARA; Government of Canada Species at Risk public registry: https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/species-risk-public-registry.html SYNONYMS: This list is being provided by the SKCDC as a tool to facilitate users in determining the current, accepted taxonomy. If a name is currently out of use in Saskatchewan, it’s current synonym is provided, indented in the line below the accepted name. In this row, we are unable to distinguish between true synonyms and misapplied names used as synonyms. For example, Cryptantha fendleri is an accepted name for a vascular plant that is currently found in Saskatchewan. This name, however, has also been misapplied to both Cryptantha kelseyana and Cryptantha minima in the past. Therefore, it appears as a synonym to those two species.
    [Show full text]
  • Chrysochus Auratus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Absolved As Pecan Pest
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 21 Number 3 - Fall 1988 Number 3 - Fall 1988 Article 7 October 1988 Chrysochus Auratus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Absolved as Pecan Pest Charles E. Williams Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Williams, Charles E. 1988. "Chrysochus Auratus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Absolved as Pecan Pest," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 21 (3) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol21/iss3/7 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Williams: <i>Chrysochus Auratus</i> (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Absolved as 1988 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 127 CHRYSOCHUS AURATUS (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) ABSOLVED AS PECAN PEST Charles E. Williams' ABSTRACT Chrysochus auratus, the dogbane beetle, has been erroneously implicated as a pecan defoliator in the early literature. Alternative scenarios suggest other chrysomelid species that may have been responsible for the defoliation. Despite the importance of the host plant to the ecology and life history of phytophagous insects, knowledge of host plants for many insects remains fragmentary. Compounding this paucity of information are blatantly false host plant records which, despite their erroneous nature. are often perpetuated through citation in published works. During a recent review of the literature concerning the dogbane beetle, Chrysochus auratus Fabricius (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), I discovered such a reference.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics of Eucolaspis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in New Zealand and Ecology of Hawke’S Bay Lineage
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Systematics of Eucolaspis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in New Zealand and ecology of Hawke’s Bay lineage A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Ecology at Massey University, Manawatu, New Zealand Prasad R.C. Doddala 2012 Abstract Eucolaspis Sharp 1886 includes a group of native leaf beetle species, one or more of which infest exotic fruit crops. Economic losses suffered by organic apple orchards in Hawke’s Bay prompt a revisit to ecological basics of the beetle. Taxonomic, behavioural and ecological knowledge gaps are addressed in the current research project. Phylogenetic analysis, based on cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 region of mitochondrial DNA, revealed that only one genetic lineage infests apples in Hawke’s Bay and that there are only three putative species in mainland New Zealand with another separate species on Three Kings Islands. These findings are well supported by differences in male genitalia shape. Morphometric analyses also supported the phylogeny to some extent. The current findings on host location show that Eucolaspis sp. “Hawke’s Bay” beetles use plant odours to detect and discriminate host and non-host plants. The beetles were attracted to fresh leaf / fruit odour of apple and blackberry, but not to either clover or broad-leaved dock. The beetles were not able to distinguish between damaged and undamaged host plants and between closely related species of host plants just by olfaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Red-Tail Biodiversity Survey Final Report
    Red-tail Biodiversity Survey Final Report White River Woods and McVey Memorial Forest 10–11 June 2017 RESULTS OF THE 2017 RED-TAIL LAND CONSERVANCY BIODIVERSITY SURVEY DELAWARE AND RANDOLPH COUNTIES, INDIANA Compiled from the Science Team Reports Assembled by Don Ruch (Indiana Academy of Science) Table of Contents Title Page………………………………………………………………………….………… 1 Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………………… 2 General Introduction and Summary of Results..…………………………………..……….. 3-4 Maps…………………………………………………………………………………….…... 5-8 Histories of McVey Memorial Forest and White River Woods …………………….……… 9-10 Geomorphlogical Assessment ……………………………………………………………… 11 Cultural Resources Assessment ……………………………………………………………. 12 Results Title Page …………………………………………………………………………... 13 Ant Team Results …………………….……………….……………………………………. 14 Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Team Results …………………….……………….…………… 15-19 Bat Team Results ……………….….………………………..……………………………… 20-25 Bee Team Results …………………….……………….……………………………………. 26-30 Beetle Team Results ………………………………………………...……………………… 31-36 Bird Team Results ……………………………………..…………………………………… 37-42 Butterfly and Odonate (Dragonflies and Damselflies) Team Results ……………………… 43-50 Fish Team Results ……………………………………………………….…………………. 51-56 Freshwater Mussel Team Results …………………………………………………………... 57-61 Herpetofauna Team Results ………………………………………………………………… 62-65 Mammal Team Results ……………………………………………………………………… 66-67 Moth Team Results …………………………………………………………………………. 68-69 Mushroom, Fungi, and Slime Mold Team Results …………………………………………. 70-74 Non-vascular Plants
    [Show full text]