Code Charts for Kurinto Fonts Kurinto Codechart Main.Pdf This Document Provides Code Charts for the Main Variant of Kurinto Fonts
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Petzl Rig Compact Self- Braking Descender
Petzl Rig Compact Self- braking Descender Brand:Petzl Options Code Description Price C6286 Yellow $275.00 +GST C1115 Black $325.00 +GST Petzl Rig Compact Self-braking Descender Designed for rope access work (expert users only) Multi-function handle allows the user to: - unlock the rope and control the descent with the hand on the free end of the rope - position himself at the work station without having to tie off the device The automatic return system on the handle limits risks in case of an involuntary action by the user Handle storage position reduces the risk of snagging when the descender is being carried on the harness. The gate on the moving side plate helps prevent dropping the device and facilitates rope installation when passing intermediate anchors Pivoting cam facilitates taking up the slack in the rope. Can also be used to make a reversible haul system, and for short ascents (in conjunction with a FOOTAPE or FOOTCORD foot loop and an ASCENSION handled rope clamp). Lowers heavy loads up to 200 kg (only for expert users; more information on this technique in the technical advice at www.petzl.com) Available in two Colours: yellow and black Specifications Min. rope diameter: 10.5 mm Max. rope diameter: 11.5 mm Weight: 380 g Certifications: EN 341 classe A, CE EN 12841 type C, NFPA 1983 Technical Use, EAC Options D21A D21AN https://colorex.co.nz/shop/products/height-safety/ascenders-descenders/petzl-rig-compact-self -braking-descender/ Page 1 E & OE | Prices are subject to change without notice | Copyright - All Rights Reserved 1633083992 Colours yellow black Rope compatibility 10.5 to 11.5 mm 10.5 to 11.5 mm https://colorex.co.nz/shop/products/height-safety/ascenders-descenders/petzl-rig-compact-self -braking-descender/ Page 2 E & OE | Prices are subject to change without notice | Copyright - All Rights Reserved 1633083992. -
8 December 2004 (Revised 10 January 2005) Topic: Unicode Technical Meeting #101, 15 -18 November 2004, Cupertino, California
To: LSA and UC Berkeley Communities From: Deborah Anderson, UCB representative and LSA liaison Date: 8 December 2004 (revised 10 January 2005) Topic: Unicode Technical Meeting #101, 15 -18 November 2004, Cupertino, California As the UC Berkeley representative and LSA liaison, I am most interested in the proposals for new characters and scripts that were discussed at the UTC, so these topics are the focus of this report. For the full minutes, readers should consult the "Unicode Technical Committee Minutes" web page (http://www.unicode.org/consortum/utc-minutes.html), where the minutes from this meeting will be posted several weeks hence. I. Proposals for New Scripts and Additional Characters A summary of the proposals and the UTC's decisions are listed below. As the proposals discussed below are made public, I will post the URLs on the SEI web page (www.linguistics.berkeley.edu/sei). A. Linguistics Characters Lorna Priest of SIL International submitted three proposals for additional linguistics characters. Most of the characters proposed are used in the orthographies of languages from Africa, Asia, Mexico, Central and South America. (For details on the proposed characters, with a description of their use and an image, see the appendix to this document.) Two characters from these proposals were not approved by the UTC because there are already characters encoded that are very similar. The evidence did not adequately demonstrate that the proposed characters are used distinctively. The two problematical proposed characters were: the modifier straight letter apostrophe (used for a glottal stop, similar to ' APOSTROPHE U+0027) and the Latin small "at" sign (used for Arabic loanwords in an orthography for the Koalib language from the Sudan, similar to @ COMMERCIAL AT U+0040). -
Assessment of Options for Handling Full Unicode Character Encodings in MARC21 a Study for the Library of Congress
1 Assessment of Options for Handling Full Unicode Character Encodings in MARC21 A Study for the Library of Congress Part 1: New Scripts Jack Cain Senior Consultant Trylus Computing, Toronto 1 Purpose This assessment intends to study the issues and make recommendations on the possible expansion of the character set repertoire for bibliographic records in MARC21 format. 1.1 “Encoding Scheme” vs. “Repertoire” An encoding scheme contains codes by which characters are represented in computer memory. These codes are organized according to a certain methodology called an encoding scheme. The list of all characters so encoded is referred to as the “repertoire” of characters in the given encoding schemes. For example, ASCII is one encoding scheme, perhaps the one best known to the average non-technical person in North America. “A”, “B”, & “C” are three characters in the repertoire of this encoding scheme. These three characters are assigned encodings 41, 42 & 43 in ASCII (expressed here in hexadecimal). 1.2 MARC8 "MARC8" is the term commonly used to refer both to the encoding scheme and its repertoire as used in MARC records up to 1998. The ‘8’ refers to the fact that, unlike Unicode which is a multi-byte per character code set, the MARC8 encoding scheme is principally made up of multiple one byte tables in which each character is encoded using a single 8 bit byte. (It also includes the EACC set which actually uses fixed length 3 bytes per character.) (For details on MARC8 and its specifications see: http://www.loc.gov/marc/.) MARC8 was introduced around 1968 and was initially limited to essentially Latin script only. -
National Rappel Operations Guide
National Rappel Operations Guide 2019 NATIONAL RAPPEL OPERATIONS GUIDE USDA FOREST SERVICE National Rappel Operations Guide i Page Intentionally Left Blank National Rappel Operations Guide ii Table of Contents Table of Contents ..........................................................................................................................ii USDA Forest Service - National Rappel Operations Guide Approval .............................................. iv USDA Forest Service - National Rappel Operations Guide Overview ............................................... vi USDA Forest Service Helicopter Rappel Mission Statement ........................................................ viii NROG Revision Summary ............................................................................................................... x Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1—1 Administration .................................................................................................. 2—1 Rappel Position Standards ................................................................................. 2—6 Rappel and Cargo Letdown Equipment .............................................................. 4—1 Rappel and Cargo Letdown Operations .............................................................. 5—1 Rappel and Cargo Operations Emergency Procedures ........................................ 6—1 Documentation ................................................................................................ -
Ffontiau Cymraeg
This publication is available in other languages and formats on request. Mae'r cyhoeddiad hwn ar gael mewn ieithoedd a fformatau eraill ar gais. [email protected] www.caerphilly.gov.uk/equalities How to type Accented Characters This guidance document has been produced to provide practical help when typing letters or circulars, or when designing posters or flyers so that getting accents on various letters when typing is made easier. The guide should be used alongside the Council’s Guidance on Equalities in Designing and Printing. Please note this is for PCs only and will not work on Macs. Firstly, on your keyboard make sure the Num Lock is switched on, or the codes shown in this document won’t work (this button is found above the numeric keypad on the right of your keyboard). By pressing the ALT key (to the left of the space bar), holding it down and then entering a certain sequence of numbers on the numeric keypad, it's very easy to get almost any accented character you want. For example, to get the letter “ô”, press and hold the ALT key, type in the code 0 2 4 4, then release the ALT key. The number sequences shown from page 3 onwards work in most fonts in order to get an accent over “a, e, i, o, u”, the vowels in the English alphabet. In other languages, for example in French, the letter "c" can be accented and in Spanish, "n" can be accented too. Many other languages have accents on consonants as well as vowels. -
Combining Diacritical Marks Range: 0300–036F the Unicode Standard
Combining Diacritical Marks Range: 0300–036F The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0 This file contains an excerpt from the character code tables and list of character names for The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0. Characters in this chart that are new for The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0 are shown in conjunction with any existing characters. For ease of reference, the new characters have been highlighted in the chart grid and in the names list. This file will not be updated with errata, or when additional characters are assigned to the Unicode Standard. See http://www.unicode.org/charts for access to a complete list of the latest character charts. Disclaimer These charts are provided as the on-line reference to the character contents of the Unicode Standard, Version 4.0 but do not provide all the information needed to fully support individual scripts using the Unicode Standard. For a complete understanding of the use of the characters contained in this excerpt file, please consult the appropriate sections of The Unicode Standard, Version 4.0 (ISBN 0-321-18578-1), as well as Unicode Standard Annexes #9, #11, #14, #15, #24 and #29, the other Unicode Technical Reports and the Unicode Character Database, which are available on-line. See http://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/UCD.html and http://www.unicode.org/unicode/reports A thorough understanding of the information contained in these additional sources is required for a successful implementation. Fonts The shapes of the reference glyphs used in these code charts are not prescriptive. Considerable variation is to be expected in actual fonts. -
Transcription of Historical Ciphers and Keys: Guidelines
cl.lingfil.uu.se/decode Beáta Megyesi [email protected] February 10, 2020 Transcription of Historical Ciphers and Keys: Guidelines Content 1 Introduction 3 2 Transcription of Ciphertext 3 2.1 Metadata 3 2.2 Content 4 2.2.1 Line breaks, spaces, punctuation and diacritical marks 4 2.2.2 Catchwords 7 2.2.3 Notes in margins 8 2.3 Transcription of ciphertext, cleartext and plaintext 10 2.4 Upload of transcriptions into the DECODE database 12 3 Transcription of Keys 12 3.1 Original keys 14 3.1.1 Metadata 14 3.1.2 Transcription of codes 14 3.1.3 Upload of transcribed original keys into the DECODE database 17 3.2 Reconstructed keys 17 3.2.1 Metadata 17 3.2.2 Transcription of codes 18 3.2.3 Upload of transcribed recovered keys into the DECODE database 18 4 Transcription of Cleartexts 18 4.1 Metadata 18 4.2 Transcription of cleartext 19 4.3 Upload of cleartext transcriptions into the DECODE database 19 5. Summary 20 Acknowledgements 20 References 20 Appendix: Transcription of Special Symbols 21 Greek letters 21 Roman numerals 22 Zodiac signs 23 Alchemical signs 24 Other signs 25 2 1 Introduction The document describes guidelines for the transcription of encrypted sources and related documents, being it ciphertext, original or recovered keys, and cleartext. Usually, the first step in attacking a cipher is the conversion of the image into a machine- readable format, represented as text. There are many different ways of transcribing a manuscript. Therefore, we developed guidelines so that the transcriptions available in the DECODE database1 (Megyesi et al., 2019) have a common format. -
Pulley / Descender / Belay Device
Multi-Purpose Device 11 mm EN FR NO SE Model No. 333010-CE Pulley / Descender / Belay Device EN 12278:2007 EN 341:2011/2A 1019 EN 12841:2006/C Patented WARNING Activities involving the use of this device are potentially dangerous. You are responsible for your own actions and decisions. Before using this device, you must: • Read and understand these user instructions and • Familiarize yourself with its capabilities warnings; and limitations; • Get specific training in its proper use; • Understand and accept the risks involved. FAILURE TO HEED ANY OF THESE WARNINGS MAY RESULT IN SEVERE INJURY OR DEATH. 0 Traceability and Markings D E B F A G C 1019 A. Body controlling production of this PPE E. Individual........................... number No. 1019 00 000 M 0000 VVUÚ, a.s. Unit serial number Pikartská 1337/7 716 07 Ostrava - Radvanice Control Czech Republic Day of manufacture Year of manufacture B. Standards F. Anchor/load end of rope C. Carefully read the instructions for use G. Free end of rope D. Model identification 2 1 Field of Application 4 Inspection, Points to Verify See Text See Text 2 Breaking Strength 5 Compatibility 44 kN O 11 mm (EN) Rope (core + sheath) static, semi-static (EN 1891) type A 22 kN 22 kN 3 Nomenclature of Parts See Text 2 7 8 1 6 10 9 3 5 4 3 6 Installing the Rope LOAD SIDE 2 4 1 3 7 Function Test 8 Securing Function Test STOP! 4 9a EN 341:2011/2A Rescue Descender Lowering From Anchor— Maximum Descent Height: 200 m One Person Minimum/Maximum Working Load: 30–240 kg Maximum Descent Rate: 2 m/s Descent—Two People -
Outbreak of SARS-Cov-2 Infections, Including COVID-19 Vaccine
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Infections, Including COVID-19 Vaccine Breakthrough Infections, Associated with Large Public Gatherings — Barnstable County, Massachusetts, July 2021 Catherine M. Brown, DVM1; Johanna Vostok, MPH1; Hillary Johnson, MHS1; Meagan Burns, MPH1; Radhika Gharpure, DVM2; Samira Sami, DrPH2; Rebecca T. Sabo, MPH2; Noemi Hall, PhD2; Anne Foreman, PhD2; Petra L. Schubert, MPH1; Glen R. Gallagher PhD1; Timelia Fink1; Lawrence C. Madoff, MD1; Stacey B. Gabriel, PhD3; Bronwyn MacInnis, PhD3; Daniel J. Park, PhD3; Katherine J. Siddle, PhD3; Vaira Harik, MS4; Deirdre Arvidson, MSN4; Taylor Brock-Fisher, MSc5; Molly Dunn, DVM5; Amanda Kearns5; A. Scott Laney, PhD2 On July 30, 2021, this report was posted as an MMWR Early Massachusetts, that attracted thousands of tourists from across Release on the MMWR website (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr). the United States. Beginning July 10, the Massachusetts During July 2021, 469 cases of COVID-19 associated Department of Public Health (MA DPH) received reports of with multiple summer events and large public gatherings in an increase in COVID-19 cases among persons who reside in a town in Barnstable County, Massachusetts, were identified or recently visited Barnstable County, including in fully vac- among Massachusetts residents; vaccination coverage among cinated persons. Persons with COVID-19 reported attending eligible Massachusetts residents was 69%. Approximately densely packed indoor and outdoor events at venues that three quarters (346; 74%) of cases occurred in fully vac- included bars, restaurants, guest houses, and rental homes. On cinated persons (those who had completed a 2-dose course July 3, MA DPH had reported a 14-day average COVID-19 of mRNA vaccine [Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna] or had incidence of zero cases per 100,000 persons per day in residents received a single dose of Janssen [Johnson & Johnson] vac- of the town in Barnstable County; by July 17, the 14-day cine ≥14 days before exposure). -
5892 Cisco Category: Standards Track August 2010 ISSN: 2070-1721
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) P. Faltstrom, Ed. Request for Comments: 5892 Cisco Category: Standards Track August 2010 ISSN: 2070-1721 The Unicode Code Points and Internationalized Domain Names for Applications (IDNA) Abstract This document specifies rules for deciding whether a code point, considered in isolation or in context, is a candidate for inclusion in an Internationalized Domain Name (IDN). It is part of the specification of Internationalizing Domain Names in Applications 2008 (IDNA2008). Status of This Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5892. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. -
Action Items from N2903 15 Action Items All Action Items Recorded in the Minutes of the Previous Meetings from M25 to M42 Have Been Either Completed Or Dropped
ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 2/WG 2 N2903A DATE: 2005-08-22 Extract of Section 15 - Action Items from N2903 15 Action items All action items recorded in the minutes of the previous meetings from M25 to M42 have been either completed or dropped. Status of outstanding action items from earlier meetings M43 to M44, and new action items from the latest meeting M45, are listed in the tables that follow. a. Meeting 25, 1994-04-18/22, Antalya, Turkey (document N1033) b. Meeting 26, 1994-10-10/14,San Francisco, CA, USA (document N1117) c. Meeting 27, 1995-04-03/07, Geneva, Switzerland (document N1203) d. Meeting 28, 1995-06-22/26, Helsinki, Finland (document N 1253) e. Meeting 29, 1995-11-06/10, Tokyo, Japan (document N1303) f. Meeting 30, 1996-04-22/26, Copenhagen, Denmark (document N1353) g. Meeting 31, 1996-08-12/16, Québec City, Canada (document N1453) h. Meeting 32, 1997-01-20/24, Singapore (document N1503) i. Meeting 33, 1997-06-30/07-04, Heraklion, Crete, Greece (document N1603) j. Meeting 34, 1998-03-16/20, Redmond, WA, USA (document N1703) k. Meeting 35, 1998-09-21/25, London, UK (document N1903) l. Meeting 36, 1999-03-09/15, Fukuoka, Japan (document N2003) m. Meeting 37, 1999-09-17/21, Copenhagen, Denmark (document N2103) n. Meeting 38, 2000-07-18/21, Beijing, China (document N2203) o. Meeting 39, 2000-10-08/11, Vouliagmeni, Athens, Greece (document N2253) p. Meeting 40, 2001-04-02/05, Mountain View, CA, USA (document N2353), and q. Meeting 41, 2001-10-15/18, Singapore (document 2403) r. -
Alphabets, Letters and Diacritics in European Languages (As They Appear in Geography)
1 Vigleik Leira (Norway): [email protected] Alphabets, Letters and Diacritics in European Languages (as they appear in Geography) To the best of my knowledge English seems to be the only language which makes use of a "clean" Latin alphabet, i.d. there is no use of diacritics or special letters of any kind. All the other languages based on Latin letters employ, to a larger or lesser degree, some diacritics and/or some special letters. The survey below is purely literal. It has nothing to say on the pronunciation of the different letters. Information on the phonetic/phonemic values of the graphic entities must be sought elsewhere, in language specific descriptions. The 26 letters a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s, t, u, v, w, x, y, z may be considered the standard European alphabet. In this article the word diacritic is used with this meaning: any sign placed above, through or below a standard letter (among the 26 given above); disregarding the cases where the resulting letter (e.g. å in Norwegian) is considered an ordinary letter in the alphabet of the language where it is used. Albanian The alphabet (36 letters): a, b, c, ç, d, dh, e, ë, f, g, gj, h, i, j, k, l, ll, m, n, nj, o, p, q, r, rr, s, sh, t, th, u, v, x, xh, y, z, zh. Missing standard letter: w. Letters with diacritics: ç, ë. Sequences treated as one letter: dh, gj, ll, rr, sh, th, xh, zh.