DOCSLIB.ORG

1. Head of Coyolxauhqui Aztec, 1450–1521; Found Near

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1. Head of Coyolxauhqui Aztec, 1450–1521; Found Near 1. Aztec Deities 2. Xochipilli Bernardino de Sahagún Aztec, 1450–1521; found in Tlalmanalco Spanish, 1499–1590 Basalt Historia general de las cosas de Nueva España (General History of Object: H: 117.2 x W: 55.5 x D: 45 cm (46 1/8 x 21 7/8 x the Things of New Spain), also called the Florentine Codex vol. 1, 17 11/16 in.) 1575–1577 Museo Nacional de Antropología, Mexico City, Mexico, 10-222116 Colonial Mexican 0/2 Watercolor, paper, contemporary vellum Spanish binding CONACULTA-INAH-MEX © foto zabé. Reproduction authorized by Open (approx.): H: 32 x W: 43 cm (12 5/8 x 16 15/16 in.) the National Institute of Anthropology and History. Object (above deck, approx.): H: 16 cm (6 5/16 in.) VEX.2010.2.3 Closed: H: 32 x W: 22 x D: 5 cm (12 5/8 x 8 11/16 x 1 5/16 in.) VEX.2010.2.28 Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, Florence, Italy, FI 100 Med.Palat. 218 Su concessione del Ministero per i Beni e le Attività Culturali. È vietata ogni ulteriore riproduzione con qualsiasi mezzo. 3. Head of Coyolxauhqui 4. Incense Burner with Chicomecoatl Aztec, 1450–1521; found near the Templo Mayor, Mexico City Aztec, 1325–1521; found in Tlahuac, Mexico City Green porphyry Terracotta and pigment Object: H: 72.5 x W: 85.5 x D: 64.5 cm, Weight: 545 kg (28 9/16 x Object: H: 105 x W: 72 x D: 48.5 cm, Weight: 34 kg (41 5/16 x 28 33 11/16 x 25 3/8 in., 1201.507 lb.) 3/8 x 19 1/8 in., 74.9564 lb.) Museo Nacional de Antropología, Mexico City, Mexico, Museo Nacional de Antropología, Mexico City, Mexico, 10-571544 10-2209118 CONACULTA-INAH-MEX © foto zabé. Reproduction authorized by CONACULTA-INAH-MEX © foto zabé. Reproduction authorized by the National Institute of Anthropology and History. the National Institute of Anthropology and History. VEX.2010.2.5 VEX.2010.2.4 The J. Paul Getty Trust 1200 Getty Center Drive, Suite 403 Tel 310 440 7360 www.getty.edu Communications Department Los Angeles, CA 90049-1681 Fax 310 440 7722 5. Tzitzimitl (Demon) 6. Vessel in the Shape of a Golden Eagle Aztec, 1440–1469; found near the Templo Mayor, Mexico City Aztec, about 1500; found near the Templo Mayor, Mexico City Terracotta, stucco, and pigment Basalt Object: H: 176 x W: 80 x D: 50 cm; 150 kg. (69 5/16 x 31 1/2 x Object: H: 76 x W: 82 x D: 139 cm; 800 kg (29 15/16 x 32 5/16 x 19 11/16 in.; 330.7 lbs.) 54 3/4 in.; 1,763.7 lbs.) Museo del Templo Mayor, Mexico City, Mexico, 10-264984 Museo del Templo Mayor, Mexico City, Mexico, 10-252747 CONACULTA-INAH-MEX © foto zabé. Reproduction authorized by CONACULTA-INAH-MEX © foto zabé. Reproduction authorized by the National Institute of Anthropology and History. the National Institute of Anthropology and History. VEX.2010.2.18 VEX.2010.2.25 7. Eagle Warrior 8. Funerary Urn with Tezcatlipoca Aztec, 1440–1469; found near the Templo Mayor, Mexico City Aztec, 1450–1500; found in the Templo Mayor, Mexico City Terracotta, stucco, and pigment Terracotta Object: H: 170 x W: 118 x D: 55 cm; 150 kg (66 15/16 x 46 7/16 x Object: H: 32.9 x W: 17.5 cm (12 15/16 x 6 7/8 in.) 21 5/8 in.; 330.7 lbs.) Museo del Templo Mayor, Mexico City, Mexico, 10-168823 Museo del Templo Mayor, Mexico City, Mexico, 10-220366 CONACULTA-INAH-MEX © foto zabé. Reproduction authorized by CONACULTA-INAH-MEX © foto zabé. Reproduction authorized by the National Institute of Anthropology and History. the National Institute of Anthropology and History. VEX.2010.2.27 VEX.2010.2.19 9. Goblet with Mictlantecuhtli 10. Water Vessel with Tlaloc Aztec, 1450–1521; found in the Templo Mayor, Mexico City Aztec, 1440–1469; found in the Templo Mayor, Mexico City Alabaster Terracotta and pigment Object: H: 16.5 x W: 12.4 x D: 9.5 cm (6 1/2 x 4 7/8 x 3 3/4 in.) Object: H: 34 x W: 27.9 x Diam: 33.7 cm (13 3/8 x 11 x 13 1/4 in.) Museo del Templo Mayor, Mexico City, Mexico, 10-168816 Museo del Templo Mayor, Mexico City, Mexico, 10-220302 CONACULTA-INAH-MEX © foto zabé. Reproduction authorized by CONACULTA-INAH-MEX © foto zabé. Reproduction authorized by the National Institute of Anthropology and History. the National Institute of Anthropology and History. VEX.2010.2.21 VEX.2010.2.55 11. Ehecatl-Quetzalcoatl 12. Figure of a Fertility Goddess Aztec, about 1500; found in Calixtlahuaca Aztec, 1250–1521; found in the Toluca-Guerrero region Basalt and pigment Cedarwood and shell Object: H: 176 x W: 56 x D: 50 cm (69 5/16 x 22 1/16 x Object: H: 39.5 x W: 15 x D: 10.2 cm, 1.2 kg (15 9/16 x 5 7/8 x 4 in., 19 11/16 in.) 2.6455 lb.) Museo de Antropología e Historia del Estado de México, Toluca de Museo Nacional de Antropología, Mexico City, Mexico, 10-74751 Lerdo, Mexico, A-36229 10-109262 CONACULTA-INAH-MEX © foto zabé. Reproduction authorized by CONACULTA-INAH-MEX © foto zabé. Reproduction authorized by the National Institute of Anthropology and History. the National Institute of Anthropology and History. VEX.2010.2.15 VEX.2010.2.1 13. Deposit of Votive Offerings 14. Eagle Aztec, 1325–1520; found in the Templo Mayor, Mexico City, Roman, A.D. 100–300 Basalt, shell, terracotta, obsidian, flint, and bone Bronze Object: H: 40.6 x W: 109.2 x D: 96.5 cm (16 x 43 x 38 in.) Object: H: 104.2 x W: 78.7 x D: 76.2 cm (41 x 31 x 30 in.) Museo del Templo Mayor, Mexico City, Mexico, 10-252003 The J. Paul Getty Museum, Villa Collection, Malibu, California CONACULTA-INAH-MEX © foto zabé. Reproduction authorized by 72.AB.151 the National Institute of Anthropology and History. VEX.2010.2.38 15. Xiuhtecuhtli Aztec, 1450–1521; found near the Templo Mayor, Mexico City Basalt Object: H: 80.6 x W: 55.2 x D: 42.5 cm, Weight: 300 kg (31 3/4 x 21 3/4 x 16 3/4 in., 661.38 lb.) Museo del Templo Mayor, Mexico City, Mexico, 10-650349 © Boris de Swan / Arqueología Mexicana / Raíces. Reproduction authorized by the National Institute of Anthropology and History. VEX.2010.2.20.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2. Water and Fire: Archaeology in the Capital of the Mexica Empire
    2. Water and Fire: Archaeology in the Capital of the Mexica Empire Leonardo Lopez Luján The archaeology of México- Tenochtitlan Tenochtitlan made up for the lack of archae- As recently as two decades ago, systematized ological exploration on a large scale. For example, information on Mexico-Tenochtitlan, the the graphic and written information on the metropolis of the most important Mesoamerican Templo Mayor (Great Temple) of Tenochtitlan state at the time of the Europeans' arrival, was was enough to reveal the history of the most extremely scarce. Unlike other cities such as Tikal, important religious building of the empire from its Monte Albán and Teotihuacan, the capital of the founding, through its multiple extensions and Mexica (Aztec) empire was never the site of right up to the time when it was completely extensive excavation projects that were to bring its dismantled. In fact, no other monument in Ancient principal remains to light. The explanation for this Mexico so commanded the attention of both archaeological ignorance is very simple. In 1521, natives and outsiders alike or was the subject of the island occupied by the twin cities of Mexico- such lengthy descriptions as this double temple Tenochtitlan and Mexico-Tlatelolco fell into the dedicated to Huitzilopochtli (the God of Sun and hands of the Spanish conquerors (fig. 8). After the War) and Tláloc (the Rain God). All kinds of victory, Hernán Cortés took the historie decision information relating to the Great Temple can be to destroy the metropolis which had been home to found in the indigenous pictographic documents between 200,000 and 300,000 inhabitants and and Náhuatl language texts; in the accounts of the covered an area of 13.5 square kilometres (Rojas European conquerors who saw it functioning and 1992: 31-5, 57-84).
    [Show full text]
  • Aztec Mythology
    Aztec Mythology One of the main things that must be appreciated about Aztec mythology is that it has both similarities and differences to European polytheistic religions. The idea of what a god was, and how they acted, was not the same between the two cultures. Along with all other native American religions, the Aztec faith developed from the Shamanism brought by the first migrants over the Bering Strait, and developed independently of influences from across the Atlantic (and Pacific). The concept of dualism is one that students of Chinese religions should be aware of; the idea of balance was primary in this belief system. Gods were not entirely good or entirely bad, being complex characters with many different aspects and their own desires and motivations. This is highlighted by the relation between Quetzalcoatl and Tezcatlipoca. When the Spanish arrived with their European sensibilities, they were quick to name one good and one evil, identifying Quetzalcoatl with Christ and Tezcatlipoca with Satan during their attempts to integrate the Nahua peoples into Christianity. But to the Aztecs neither god would have been “better” than the other; they are just different and opposing sides of the same duality. Indeed, their identities are rather nebulous, with Quetzalcoatl often being referred to as “White Tezcatlipoca” and Tezcatlipoca as “Black Quetzalcoatl”. The Mexica, as is explained in the history section, came from North of Mexico in a location they named “Aztlan” (from which Europeans developed the term Aztec). During their migration south they were exposed to and assimilated elements of several native religions, including those of the Toltecs, Mayans, and Zapotecs.
    [Show full text]
  • Hierarchy in the Representation of Death in Pre- and Post-Conquest Aztec Codices
    1 Multilingual Discourses Vol. 1.2 Spring 2014 Tanya Ball The Power of Death: Hierarchy in the Representation of Death in Pre- and Post-Conquest Aztec Codices hrough an examination of Aztec death iconography in pre- and post-Conquest codices of the central valley of Mexico T (Borgia, Mendoza, Florentine, and Telleriano-Remensis), this paper will explore how attitudes towards the Aztec afterlife were linked to questions of hierarchical structure, ritual performance and the preservation of Aztec cosmovision. Particular attention will be paid to the representation of mummy bundles, sacrificial debt- payment and god-impersonator (ixiptla) sacrificial rituals. The scholarship of Alfredo López-Austin on Aztec world preservation through sacrifice will serve as a framework in this analysis of Aztec iconography on death. The transformation of pre-Hispanic traditions of representing death will be traced from these pre- to post-Conquest Mexican codices, in light of processes of guided syncretism as defined by Hugo G. Nutini and Diana Taylor’s work on the performative role that codices play in re-activating the past. These practices will help to reflect on the creation of the modern-day Mexican holiday of Día de los Muertos. Introduction An exploration of the representation of death in Mexica (popularly known as Aztec) pre- and post-Conquest Central Mexican codices is fascinating because it may reveal to us the persistence and transformation of Aztec attitudes towards death and the after-life, which in some cases still persist today in the Mexican holiday Día de Tanya Ball 2 los Muertos, or Day of the Dead. This tradition, which hails back to pre-Columbian times, occurs every November 1st and 2nd to coincide with All Saints’ Day and All Souls’ day in the Christian calendar, and honours the spirits of the deceased.
    [Show full text]
  • God of the Month: Tlaloc
    God of the Month: Tlaloc Tlaloc, lord of celestial waters, lightning flashes and hail, patron of land workers, was one of the oldest and most important deities in the Aztec pantheon. Archaeological evidence indicates that he was worshipped in Mesoamerica before the Aztecs even settled in Mexico's central highlands in the 13th century AD. Ceramics depicting a water deity accompanied by serpentine lightning bolts date back to the 1st Tlaloc shown with a jaguar helm. Codex Vaticanus B. century BC in Veracruz, Eastern Mexico. Tlaloc's antiquity as a god is only rivalled by Xiuhtecuhtli the fire lord (also Huehueteotl, old god) whose appearance in history is marked around the last few centuries BC. Tlaloc's main purpose was to send rain to nourish the growing corn and crops. He was able to delay rains or send forth harmful hail, therefore it was very important for the Aztecs to pray to him, and secure his favour for the following agricultural cycle. Read on and discover how crying children, lepers, drowned people, moun- taintops and caves were all important parts of the symbolism surrounding this powerful ancient god... Starting at the very beginning: Tlaloc in Watery Deaths Tamoanchan. Right at the beginning of the world, before the gods were sent down to live on Earth as mortal beings, they Aztecs who died from one of a list of the fol- lived in Tamoanchan, a paradise created by the divine lowing illnesses or incidents were thought to Tlaloc vase. being Ometeotl for his deity children. be sent to the 'earthly paradise' of Tlalocan.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mat of Serpents: Aztec Strategies of Control from an Empire in Decline
    A Mat of Serpents: Aztec Strategies of Control from an Empire in Decline Jerónimo Reyes On my honor, Professors Andrea Lepage and Elliot King mark the only aid to this thesis. “… the ruler sits on the serpent mat, and the crown and the skull in front of him indicate… that if he maintained his place on the mat, the reward was rulership, and if he lost control, the result was death.” - Aztec rulership metaphor1 1 Emily Umberger, " The Metaphorical Underpinnings of Aztec History: The Case of the 1473 Civil War," Ancient Mesoamerica 18, 1 (2007): 18. I dedicate this thesis to my mom, my sister, and my brother for teaching me what family is, to Professor Andrea Lepage for helping me learn about my people, to Professors George Bent, and Melissa Kerin for giving me the words necessary to find my voice, and to everyone and anyone finding their identity within the self and the other. Table of Contents List of Illustrations ………………………………………………………………… page 5 Introduction: Threads Become Tapestry ………………………………………… page 6 Chapter I: The Sum of its Parts ………………………………………………… page 15 Chapter II: Commodification ………………………………………………… page 25 Commodification of History ………………………………………… page 28 Commodification of Religion ………………………………………… page 34 Commodification of the People ………………………………………… page 44 Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………... page 53 Illustrations ……………………………………………………………………... page 54 Appendices ……………………………………………………………………... page 58 Bibliography ……………………………………………………………………... page 60 …. List of Illustrations Figure 1: Statue of Coatlicue, Late Period, 1439 (disputed) Figure 2: Peasant Ritual Figurines, Date Unknown Figure 3: Tula Warrior Figure Figure 4: Mexica copy of Tula Warrior Figure, Late Aztec Period Figure 5: Coyolxauhqui Stone, Late Aztec Period, 1473 Figure 6: Male Coyolxauhqui, carving on greenstone pendant, found in cache beneath the Coyolxauhqui Stone, Date Unknown Figure 7: Vessel with Tezcatlipoca Relief, Late Aztec Period, ca.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bilimek Pulque Vessel (From in His Argument for the Tentative Date of 1 Ozomatli, Seler (1902-1923:2:923) Called Atten- Nicholson and Quiñones Keber 1983:No
    CHAPTER 9 The BilimekPulqueVessel:Starlore, Calendrics,andCosmologyof LatePostclassicCentralMexico The Bilimek Vessel of the Museum für Völkerkunde in Vienna is a tour de force of Aztec lapidary art (Figure 1). Carved in dark-green phyllite, the vessel is covered with complex iconographic scenes. Eduard Seler (1902, 1902-1923:2:913-952) was the first to interpret its a function and iconographic significance, noting that the imagery concerns the beverage pulque, or octli, the fermented juice of the maguey. In his pioneering analysis, Seler discussed many of the more esoteric aspects of the cult of pulque in ancient highland Mexico. In this study, I address the significance of pulque in Aztec mythology, cosmology, and calendrics and note that the Bilimek Vessel is a powerful period-ending statement pertaining to star gods of the night sky, cosmic battle, and the completion of the Aztec 52-year cycle. The Iconography of the Bilimek Vessel The most prominent element on the Bilimek Vessel is the large head projecting from the side of the vase (Figure 2a). Noting the bone jaw and fringe of malinalli grass hair, Seler (1902-1923:2:916) suggested that the head represents the day sign Malinalli, which for the b Aztec frequently appears as a skeletal head with malinalli hair (Figure 2b). However, because the head is not accompanied by the numeral coefficient required for a completetonalpohualli Figure 2. Comparison of face date, Seler rejected the Malinalli identification. Based on the appearance of the date 8 Flint on front of Bilimek Vessel with Aztec Malinalli sign: (a) face on on the vessel rim, Seler suggested that the face is the day sign Ozomatli, with an inferred Bilimek Vessel, note malinalli tonalpohualli reference to the trecena 1 Ozomatli (1902-1923:2:922-923).
    [Show full text]
  • 157. Templo Mayor (Main Temple). Tenochtitlan (Modern Mexico City, Mexico)
    157. Templo Mayor (main Temple). Tenochtitlan (modern Mexico City, Mexico). Mexica (Aztec). 1375-1520 C.E. Stone (temple); volcanic stone (The Coyolxauhqui Stone); jadeite (Olmec-style mask); basalt (Calendar Stone). (4 images) dedicated simultaneously to two gods, Huitzilopochtli, god of war, and Tlaloc, god of rain and agriculture, each of which had a shrine at the top of the pyramid with separate staircases 328 by 262 ft) at its base, dominated the Sacred Precinct rebuilt six times After the destruction of Tenochtitlan, the Templo Mayor, like most of the rest of the city, was taken apart and then covered over by the new Spanish colonial city After earlier small attempts to excavate - the push to fully excavate the site did not come until late in the 20th century. On 25 February 1978, workers for the electric company were digging at a place in the city then popularly known as the "island of the dogs." It was named such because it was slightly elevated over the rest of the neighborhood and when there was flooding, street dogs would congregate there. At just over two meters down they struck a pre-Hispanic monolith. This stone turned out to be a huge disk of over 3.25 meters (10.7 feet) in diameter, 30 centimeters (11.8 inches) thick and weighing 8.5 metric tons (8.4 long tons; 9.4 short tons). The relief on the stone was later determined to be Coyolxauhqui, the moon goddess, dating to the end of the 15th century o From 1978 to 1982, specialists directed by archeologist Eduardo Matos Moctezuma worked on the project to excavate the Temple.[5] Initial excavations found that many of the artifacts were in good enough condition to study.[7] Efforts coalesced into the Templo Mayor Project, which was authorized by presidential decree.[8] o To excavate, thirteen buildings in this area had to be demolished.
    [Show full text]
  • La Doctrina De Xochipilli
    La Doctrina de Xochipilli Jenaro Ismael Reyes Tovar María Guadalupe Rodríguez Licea Dibujos: Rubén Soto Orozco Sabiduría Gnóstica Material didáctico de uso interno y exclusivo de estudiantes del Instituto Cultural Quetzalcóatl de Antropología Psicoanalítica, A.C. www.samaelgnosis.net | www.samaelgnosis.org | www.samaelgnosis.us La Doctrina de Xochipilli www.samaelgnosis.net La Doctrina de Xochipilli Autores del libro y fotografías: Jenaro Ismael Reyes Tovar y María Guadalupe Rodríguez Licea Portada y dibujos: Rubén Soto Orozco © Todos los derechos reservados. Flores, símbolo de la belleza espiritual y la alegría del alma. [Teotihuacán] Página web: www.samaelgnosis.net www.samaelgnosis.org www.samaelgnosis.us El contenido de este libro está basado en las conferencias y libros del V.M. Samael Aun Weor. Es el resultado del trabajo y cariño que ponen los instructores gnósticos y el equipo de voluntarios del Instituto Cultural Quetzalcóatl. 2 La Doctrina de Xochipilli www.samaelgnosis.net Introducción l amor es la fuerza más poderosa que existe en todo el cosmos infinito; tiene el poder de transformar radicalmente al ser humano, es capaz de llevarlo, de ser un simple E gusano del lodo del mundo a las esferas más sublimes y divinas. En el origen de los tiempos, el amor dio existencia al universo; y, una vez creado, esta fuerza tiene la capacidad de sostenerlo firme en su marcha; por tanto, si es tal el poder que tiene, cuando el ser humano lo llega a encarnar, éste posee, en consecuencia, la potestad para transformar su vida completamente. El amor todo lo puede, todo lo penetra, todo lo vence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Temple of Quetzalcoatl and the Cult of Sacred War at Teotihuacan
    The Temple of Quetzalcoatl and the cult of sacred war at Teotihuacan KARLA. TAUBE The Temple of Quetzalcoatl at Teotihuacan has been warrior elements found in the Maya region also appear the source of startling archaeological discoveries since among the Classic Zapotee of Oaxaca. Finally, using the early portion of this century. Beginning in 1918, ethnohistoric data pertaining to the Aztec, Iwill discuss excavations by Manuel Gamio revealed an elaborate the possible ethos surrounding the Teotihuacan cult and beautifully preserved facade underlying later of war. construction. Although excavations were performed intermittently during the subsequent decades, some of The Temple of Quetzalcoatl and the Tezcacoac the most important discoveries have occurred during the last several years. Recent investigations have Located in the rear center of the great Ciudadela revealed mass dedicatory burials in the foundations of compound, the Temple of Quetzalcoatl is one of the the Temple of Quetzalcoatl (Sugiyama 1989; Cabrera, largest pyramidal structures at Teotihuacan. In volume, Sugiyama, and Cowgill 1988); at the time of this it ranks only third after the Pyramid of the Moon and writing, more than eighty individuals have been the Pyramid of the Sun (Cowgill 1983: 322). As a result discovered interred in the foundations of the pyramid. of the Teotihuacan Mapping Project, it is now known Sugiyama (1989) persuasively argues that many of the that the Temple of Quetzalcoatl and the enclosing individuals appear to be either warriors or dressed in Ciudadela are located in the center of the ancient city the office of war. (Mill?n 1976: 236). The Ciudadela iswidely considered The archaeological investigations by Cabrera, to have been the seat of Teotihuacan rulership, and Sugiyama, and Cowgill are ongoing, and to comment held the palaces of the principal Teotihuacan lords extensively on the implications of their work would be (e.g., Armillas 1964: 307; Mill?n 1973: 55; Coe 1981: both premature and presumptuous.
    [Show full text]
  • Aztec Festivals of the Rain Gods
    Michael Graulich Aztec Festivals of the Rain Gods Aunque contiene ritos indiscutiblemente agrícolas, el antiguo calendario festivo de veintenas (o 'meses') de la época azteca resulta totalmente desplazado en cuanto a las temporadas, puesto que carece de intercalados que adaptan el año solar de 365 días a la duración efectiva del año tropical. Creo haber demostrado en diversas pu- blicaciones que las fiestas pueden ser interpretadas en rigor sólo en relación con su posición original, no corrida aún. El presente trabajo muestra cómo los rituales y la re- partición absolutamente regular y lógica de las vein- tenas, dedicadas esencialmente a las deidades de la llu- via - tres en la temporada de lluvias y una en la tempo- rada de sequía - confirman el fenómeno del desplaza- miento. The Central Mexican festivals of the solar year are described with consi- derable detail in XVIth century sources and some of them have even been stu- died by modern investigators (Paso y Troncoso 1898; Seler 1899; Margain Araujo 1945; Acosta Saignes 1950; Nowotny 1968; Broda 1970, 1971; Kirchhoff 1971). New interpretations are nevertheless still possible, especially since the festivals have never been studied as a whole, with reference to the myths they reenacted, and therefore, could not be put in a proper perspective. Until now, the rituals of the 18 veintenas {twenty-day 'months') have always been interpreted according to their position in the solar year at the time they were first described to the Spaniards. Such festivals with agricultural rites have been interpreted, for example, as sowing or harvest festivals on the sole ground that in the 16th century they more or less coincided with those seasonal events.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Classic Religious Movements
    THE EMERGENCE OF THE MAYA TLALOC: A LATE CLASSIC RELIGIOUS ICON by AMANDA TOYIE GROFF B.A. University of Central Florida, 2003 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Anthropology in the College of Sciences at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Fall Term 2007 © 2007 Amanda Toyie Groff ii ABSTRACT Iconography has the capability to memorialize and guarantee one’s place in history; iconography can also provide powerful insight into human culture, and explore social and cultural values in a visual manner. Iconography can incorporate information about group identities, allegiances, religious affiliations, propaganda, and acceptance within both modern and ancient societies. By studying a specific iconographic figure, the Central Mexican god Tlaloc, as a visual representation of a belief or identity, we can glean a greater understanding of the cultural transmission of iconographic symbols. The substantial use of this icon, in both Central Mexico and the Maya region, reveals iconography as capable of being catalogued and traced over space and time to interpret meaning. With these goals in mind, this research project focuses on the iconographic representations of the Central Mexican god Tlaloc in the Maya region. It was during the Early Classic Period (A.D. 250-550) that Tlaloc transcended the boundaries of Central Mexico and was adopted into Maya ideology. During the Late Classic Period (A.D.550- 900), a ‘Maya Tlaloc’ was established and used to express ideologies depicting warfare and ritual activity. The adoption of Tlaloc imagery among the ancient Maya ultimately holds significant value to understanding Maya ideology and religion as well as facilitates an understanding of wide-scale interactions with Central Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 REMARKS on a NAHUATL HYMN Xippe Ycuic, Totec. Yoallavama
    N68 IV : 2 REMARKS ON A NAHUATL HYMN Xippe ycuic, totec. Yoallavama. Yoalli tlavana, yztleican timonenequia, xiyaquimitlatia teucuitlaque- mitl, xicmoquentiquetl ovia. Noteua, chalchimamatlaco apanaytemoaya, ay, quetzalavevetl, ay quetzalxivicoatl. Nechiya, yquinocauhquetl, oviya. Maniyavia, niavia poliviz, niyoatzin. Achalchiuhtla noyollo; a teu- cuitlatl noyolcevizqui tlacatl achtoquetl tlaquavaya otlacatqui yautla- toaquetl oviya. Noteua, ce intlaco xayailivis conoa yyoatzin motepeyocpa mitzalitta moteua, noyolcevizquin tlacatl achtoquetl tlaquavaya, otlacatqui yau- tlatoaquetl, oviya. —so runs an ancient Mexican hymn to the god Xipe Totec, preserved in a manuscript of the 1580's when the memory of the old faith had not been far submerged beneath the Christian. It was, however, of a far older date than the generation which saw the Conquest. By even that time the meaning had become so obscure through alteration of the language that it required a marginal gloss, which will aid us in 1 This study was found among the late R. H. Barlow's unpublished papers, now preserved at the University of the Americas. The work possibly dates back as early as 1943.44, when he first began to study Náhuati literature. It seems to be typical of his early style, more imagina- tive, less reserved, than his later, more scholarly, manner of writing. It is evident that Barlow had planned to re-write the study in later years. On the first page the following pencil-written words appear: "This would have to be revised some if you're interested. R.H.B." On the back of the last leaf the following criticism (not in the author's handwriting) may be read: "Was the poem the work of 'a poet'? Should be asked if not answered.
    [Show full text]