Aarchitecture 19Download

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aarchitecture 19Download AARCHITECTURE 19 THIS ISSUE CONTINUES TO TRACK THE PROGRESS OF A YEAR IN THE LIFE OF THE SCHOOL BY FOCUSING ON ‘STUFF’ IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH WHAT COMES AFTER ‘RESEARCH’ – THE TOPIC EXAMINED IN THE LAST ISSUE. WE CONTINUE TO REFLECT ON AA LIFE FROM AS MANY DIFFERING VIEWPOINTS AS POSSIBLE, WITH TUTORS, STUDENTS, MEMBERS AND GRADUATES OFTEN PROPOSING AS MANY NEW QUESTIONS ABOUT THe ‘STUFF’ oF THE SCHOOL AS THEY DO ANSWERS. INCLUDED IN THAT FOCUS ARE STARK U S T F F CONTRASTS BETWEEN DIPLOMA UNITs – fROM SHIN EgASHIRA’S TEACHING PHILOSOPHY IN UNIT 11 OFFERING A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE TO THE WIDE SPECTRUM OF PRODUCTION IN LIAM YOUNG AND KATE DAVIES’ UNKNOWN FIELDS DIVISION, DIPLOMA 6. MEANWHILE, A KALEIDOSCOPIC PHOTO ESSAY AND COMMENTARY SHOWCASE THE HELMETS OF INTERMEDIATE 11’S IbIZA-BASED UNIT. AND THIRD NEWS FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL ASSOCIATION YEAR STUDENT JULIET HAYSOM DEALS WITH THE SHOddy, HIGHLY TELLING PHOTOGRAPHY OF EBAY’S MARKET STALL HOLDERS AS PART OF HER WORK IN INTERMEDIATE UNIT 5. STUFF, A WORD THAT HAS ENJOYED FREQUENT AppEARANCES IN PETER COOK’S LECTURES AT THE SCHOOL OVER MANY YEARS, TOOK ON A DIFFERENT MEANING FOR HIM ALTOGETHER WHEN AArchitecture 19 / Term 2 2012/13 www.aaschool.ac.uk ©2013 All rights reserved Published by the Architectural Association 36 Bedford Square, London WC1B 3ES Please send your news items for the next issue to [email protected] Student Editorial Team Eleanor Dodman (Fourth Year) Radu Remus Macovei (Third Year) Roland Shaw (Fourth Year) Editorial Board Alex Lorente, Membership Brett Steele, AA School Director Zak Kyes, AA Art Director Graphic Design Claire McManus AA Photography Valerie Bennett and Sue Barr Printed by Blackmore, England Architectural Association (Inc) Registered Charity No 311083 Company limited by guarantee Registered in England No 171402 Registered office as above Cover: Wax rubbing of coal hole cover outside 33 Bedford Square by Mark Simmonds, London, May 2013, www.marksimmonds.info AARCHITECTURE 19 THIS ISSUE CONTINUES TO TRACK THE PROGRESS OF A YEAR IN THE LIFE OF THE SCHOOL BY FOCUSING ON ‘STUFF’ IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH WHAT COMES AFTER ‘RESEARCH’ – THE TOPIC EXAMINED IN THE LAST ISSUE. WE CONTINUE TO REFLECT ON AA LIFE FROM AS MANY DIFFERING VIEWPOINTS AS POSSIBLE, WITH TUTORS, STUDENTS, MEMBERS AND GRADUATES OFTEN PROPOSING AS MANY NEW QUESTIONS ABOUT THe ‘STUFF’ oF THE SCHOOL AS THEY DO ANSWERS. INCLUDED IN THAT FOCUS ARE STARK CONTRASTS BETWEEN DIPLOMA UNITs – fROM SHIN EgASHIRA’S TEACHING PHILOSOPHY IN UNIT 11 OFFERING A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE TO THE WIDE SPECTRUM OF PRODUCTION IN LIAM YOUNG AND KATE DAVIES’ UNKNOWN FIELDS DIVISION, DIPLOMA 6. MEANWHILE, A KALEIDOSCOPIC PHOTO ESSAY AND COMMENTARY SHOWCASE THE HELMETS OF INTERMEDIATE 11’S IbIZA-BASED UNIT. AND THIRD NEWS FROM THE ARCHITECTURAL ASSOCIATION YEAR STUDENT JULIET HAYSOM DEALS WITH THE SHOddy, HIGHLY TELLING PHOTOGRAPHY OF EBAY’S MARKET STALL HOLDERS AS PART OF HER WORK IN INTERMEDIATE UNIT 5. STUFF, A WORD THAT HAS ENJOYED FREQUENT AppEARANCES IN PETER COOK’S LECTURES AT THE SCHOOL OVER MANY YEARS, TOOK ON A DIFFERENT MEANING FOR HIM ALTOGETHER WHEN HE STARTED TO BUILD HIS PROJECTS. HIS LIVELY COMMENTARY ABOUT HIS OWN RECENT PROGRESS IN ARCHITECTURE EXPANDS UPON THE VIEWS OF TUTORS AND STUDENTS. HAPPILY, IT SEEMS IMPOSSIBLE TO COME TO AN AGREED DEFINITION OF THIS ISSUE’S THEME OF STUFF, AND SO WE ARE PLEASED TO DEMONSTRATE, WITH AARCHITECURE 19, THAT THE POSSIBILITIES OF PRODUCTION AT THE AA CONTINUE TO EXPAND, GROW AND DIVERSIFY, IN NO SMALL WAY OWING TO THEIR OWN DETAILED UNKNOWABILITY. STUDENT EDITORS: ELEANOR DODMAN RADU REMUS MACOVEI ROLAND SHAW CONTENTS 2 SYSTEMS, STORIES AND THE STUFF INBETWEEN 3 THE UNIT SPACE AS MODEL CITY 4 BLUEPriNTS FOR THE fuTurE 6 SPACE HELMETS 9 A COLLECTION OF THINGS FOUND ON A DETOUR 12 STEELE ON STuff 14 ArCHITECTurE AS EXHibiTION SPACE 16 STuff 18 THE EXHibiTION AS A PROJECT 20 ArTISTS’ TALKS AT THE AA 23 META-REALITIES 24 A VISIT TO THE ArCHIVE AA CONVERSATIONS 25 INTRODUCTION TO FAbriCATION OF KALEIDOSCOPES 26 TOO muCH IS NEVER ENOUGH! 28 LET’S GET STuffED! 30 ‘WE HAVE A LOT OF STuff IN THE PHOTO LibrAry’ 34 EBAY STILL LiFES 36 THE INTERNET IS STuff 38 mEmbERSHIP EVENTS 40 REMEmbEriNG ALAN COLQUHOUN, THE friEND 41 rECOmmENDED READING 42 NEW frOM AA PubLICATIONS 44 NEW frOM BEDFORD PrESS 46 NEWS NEXT ISSUE’S THEME SCHOOL ANNOUNCEMENT STUDENT ANNOUNCEMENT 2 SYSTEMS, STORIES AND THE STUFF INBETWEEN Kate Davies and Liam Young, unit masters from Diploma Unit 6, explain the unit’s work through networks and narratives. Cities like London are networked objects that condition and are conditioned by distant landscapes. Those landscapes – the iconic and the ignored, the excavated, irradiated and the pristine – are embedded in global systems that connect them in surprising and complicated ways to our everyday lives. Each year the Unknown Fields Division navigates a different global trajectory, setting out on expeditions through alien landscapes, industrial ecologies and precarious wilderness to bear witness to alternative worlds. We do this as a means of understanding our familiar world in new ways. The Division is concerned with complex global systems, supply chains and infrastructure – those elusive tendrils, twisting threadlike over everything around us, crisscrossing the The Division is interested in the planet, connecting the mundane to the spaces between things. Here architectural extraordinary. Our physical environment is interventions can exist between a logic shaped by this stuff, buffeted by economic board in a supercomputer and the frozen winds, stitched and stretched into place Arctic Ocean it is modelling, or in the ivision, ivision, through global demand. We view infrastruc- millisecond time-lag of a stock market trade. D ture as a series of interwoven narratives, They can exist between your gold-plated a network of hidden stories that connect us headphone jack and a hole in the Australian to each other, and to remote locations. Outback two miles wide, between where Stories are a useful connective tissue a satellite thinks you are and where you with which to make sense of messy and really are. They can exist in the 60-second complex systems. Through storytelling warning before an earthquake in Mexico we can relate to some of this complexity City or along the 30,000-mile journey your in meaningful ways, chronicling existing pair of Levis 501 takes before you get to conditions and constructing a series of wear them. parallel narratives and partial fabrications. In this way projects emerge as a We use speculative scenarios as critical constellation of stories and strategies, instruments for exploring the conse- fragments and fables that stitch together quences of emerging conditions, often dislocated places, unravelling complicated deploying time-based media – film, systems and interrogating contemporary animation, gaming – to articulate dynamic relationships between culture, technology For more information on Unknown Fields information more For spaces, ebbs and flows, cycles and shifts. and nature. www.unknownfieldsdivision.com please visit 3 THE UNit SPACE AS moDel City Shin Egashira, unit master of Diploma Unit 11, describes his approach through the accumulation of models in his unit space. The first people to open the door of Dip 11’s What if we draw an analogy to the Unit space are cleaners who come around notion of ‘Transitional Object’ used in child at 7am every morning. The challenge for psychology? A series of comfort objects them is that they have to guess what to that not only babies and toddlers but also leave and what to trash. Somehow, their grown-ups use and leave behind them as guess is always right. they help us make associations between There are different cycles. For instance objects and symbolise a bridge between objects that come and go weekly and daily the imaginary and the real that is unknown are usually on the table and floor. Monthly to collective. Mark Cousins suggests that objects usually reside on the wall and side when toddlers discharge by themselves table. Ours is a space for both the accumu- for the first time, they consider their smelly lation and production of objects, tools and shit as the most fascinating piece of architectural things, which are produced artwork. I am not at all suggesting the yearly with different teams of students and Dip 11 unit space is full of shit; perhaps it’s briefs. The academic year usually starts analogous to something like an attic of an with the making and unmaking of collage old house (or a mad house) where ambi- cities. The aim is partly to recycle leftover tious young architects imagine their cities pieces of models from previous years, by playing with their toys; reinventing them giving new concepts by re-organising them by cutting, dropping, juxtaposing, piling, within a set of new contexts. A new London adjoining, extruding, drawing and re- emerges from the clusters of old objects arranging, playing games selecting and in the unit space every year. There are deselecting. Objects that we often end up 32 building models today as I counted. not throwing away because of their singular About half of them are designs in values often end up in the attic. iploma Unit 11 please visit please visit 11 Unit iploma progress from current students. Some Dip 11’s objects fill the gaps between D of the models are incomplete as they are ideas and procedures: zooming in and dissected through acts of design explora- out, making and looking, representing tions or destroyed or improved by partial and designing. The type of model we don’t removals. There are more than 150 detail make is a complete illustration of how the fragments and over 600 pieces of material proposals may look.
Recommended publications
  • Estates Management MARCH 30 2007
    Estates TSH-30-03-07-01 16/3/07 10:28 am Page 1 Estates Management MARCH 30 2007 Recycling proficiency Green Gown Award winners Estates TSH-30-03-07-02-03 16/3/07 10:30 am Page 1 l l l l l ESTATES n Diversity of subjects and modularisation n The growth of further education n Role of student residence in learning. Exploit your The physical environment has always been an important factor in the learning process, although it is difficult to pin down its precise effect. The Times Good property University Guide notes that five of its top ten universities have the highest library and facilities expenditure levels. Research into student attitudes to selecting a university, conducted by the Sheffield Hallam Facilities potential Management Centre, found that high- quality environments had an effect. The physical environment of an institution is crucial to the A more telling example comes from the learning experience. Paul Watson surveys efforts to adapt further education sector, which is about a third of the way through a £4.5 billion facilities to student aspirations and to the 21st century capital replacement programme. The first projects are coming on stream. There has been a rise in the number of applications of niversities have been a as a whole have not kept pace. The overall between 50 per cent and 80 per cent, and remarkably successful business size of the estate is estimated to have also evidence of higher learning outcomes model for the past 500 years grown by less than 10 per cent in the past and more staff satisfaction from teaching.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae (Summary)
    Curriculum Vitae (Summary) Jason Griffiths. BA Hons Dip Arch. Associate Professor UNL W. Cecil Steward Professor. Hawthorne Distinguished Faculty 1223 N 9th St #114 Lincoln NE 68508 Cell: 480 2976171 Email: [email protected] EDUCATION The Bartlett – University College London (UCL) June 91 i Completed Diploma in Architecture. Awarded Distinction. RIBA Part 2 Kingston Polytechnic June 87 Registered Architect - Architects Registration Board (ARB) UK. June 95 TEACHING University of Lincoln Nebraska - Associate Professor with tenure. 2018 -Present NIRMA University, Ahmedabad, India - Visiting Faculty Jan. 2020 Sharda University, Delhi, India - Visiting Faculty. Jan 2019 School of Architecture at Taliesin - Professor for Summer Immersion. June – August 2017/18/19 University of Lincoln Nebraska - Assistant Professor August 2015-18 Architectural Association- Instructor – AA Visiting School, Chengdu, China July 2016 & 2015 University of Lincoln Nebraska - 2015 Hyde Chair of Excellence - College of Architecture Arizona State University - Assistant Professor, The Design School. August 2007-2014 The Architectural Association - Instructor – Marking the Forest (AA Visiting School – Oregon) August 2012-13 University of Texas at Austin - Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture. January – May 2004 University of Westminster, London, UK - Senior Lecturer, module and deputy diploma course leader Department of Architecture. September 1997-2002 Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK. Senior Lecturer, Department of Architecture September 1999-2001 Bartlett School of Architecture - Diploma Unit 16 instructor. 1995-1997 Bartlett School of Architecture- M.Arch. instructor 1994-997 SPONSORED PROJECTS: Public, Private, University. TINDU Pavilion NIRMA University, Ahmedabad, India. Feb 2020 The Sharda University Shade Structure – Nioda, Delh.i Jan 2019 The Mizer’s Ruin, Ogallala, Nebraska - Estimated completion July 2023 The Mazo Bandshell.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston City Hall: Conception and Reception
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Boston City Hall: Conception and Reception in the Era of Civil Defense ! ! Angie! Jo HAA 98br: Advanced Tutorial: Methods of Architectural History December! 15, 2014 Instructor: David Sadighian !1 Boston City Hall: Conception and Reception in the Era of Civil Defense ! . there is no such thing as a merely given, or simply available, starting point: beginnings have to be made for each project in such a way as to enable what follows from them. The idea of beginning, indeed the act of beginning, necessarily involves an act of delimitation by which something is cut out of a great mass of material, separated from the mass, and made to stand for, as well as be, a starting point, a beginning. ! - Edward Said, Orientalism Introduction Boston City Hall has been equally described as beautiful and monstrous, a fortress, a bunker, intimidating, dignified, a waste of space, and the greatest use of space, in a passionate and polarizing struggle of reception from its design in 1962, to its current state in 2014. Its conception is often attributed to human actors—the architects Kallmann McKinnell & Knowles and the competition jury that chose their design—and the intentions of character and resolve, articulated governance, and openness to civic life that they proposed on paper long before any building went up. These intentions have nearly always been described as abstract ideals removed from any particular political situation that may necessitate such “character and resolve.” There was not a word mentioned, either in the commission or in the architects’ statements, of the political nature of the civic project, nor the national and international tensions of the time—non-human actors that inevitably had a hand in the making of Boston City Hall, but have rarely been addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Regionalism and Beton Brut Around Late Le Corbusier
    REGIONALISM + BRUTALISM AROUND LATE LE CORBUSIER REYNER BANHAM THE NEW BRUTALISM 1966 It was, in the beginning, a term of communist abuse, and it was intended to signify the normal vocabulary of Modern Architecture - at roofs, glass, exposed structure - considered as morally reprehensible deviations from “e New Humanism,” a phrase which means something dierent in Marxist hands... REYNER BANHAM THE NEW BRUTALISM 1966 e term had no sooner got into public circulation than its meaning began to narrow. Among the non-Marxist grouping there was no particular unity of programme or intention, but there was a certain community of interests, a tendency to look toward Le Corbusier, and to be aware of something called Le Beton Brut... REYNER BANHAM THE NEW BRUTALISM 1966 Whatever has been said about honest use of materials, most modern buildings appear to be made of whitewash or patent glazing, even when they are made of concrete or steel. Hunstanton appears to be made of glass, brick, steel and concrete, and is in fact made of glass, brick, steel and concrete. REYNER BANHAM THE NEW BRUTALISM 1966 Le Corbusier’s Late Works LE CORBUSIER PETITE MAISON DE WEEKEND | PARIS, FRANCE 1935 LE CORBUSIER PETITE MAISON DE WEEKEND | PARIS, FRANCE 1935 LE CORBUSIER PETITE MAISON DE WEEKEND | PARIS, FRANCE 1935 LE CORBUSIER HOUSE AT MATHES (VILLA SEXTANT) | LES MATHES, FRANCE 1935 LE CORBUSIER HOUSE AT MATHES (VILLA SEXTANT) | LES MATHES, FRANCE 1935 LE CORBUSIER HOUSE AT MATHES (VILLA SEXTANT) | LES MATHES, FRANCE 1935 LE CORBUSIER MAISONS JAOUL | PARIS, FRANCE
    [Show full text]
  • Mid 20Th Century Architecture in NH: 1945-1975
    Mid 20th Century Architecture in NH: 1945-1975 Prepared by Lisa Mausolf, Preservation Consultant for NH Employment Security December 2012 Table of Contents Page I. Introduction 3 II. Methodology 4 III. Historic Context, Architecture in NH, 1945‐1975 5 IV. Design Trends in New Hampshire, 1945‐1975 43 Changes in the Post‐World War II Building Industry 44 Architectural Trends, 1945‐1975 61 Styles 63 V. Recommendations for Future Study 85 VI. Bibliography 86 Appendix A Examples of Resource Types 90 Appendix B Lists of NH Architects 1956, 1962, 1970 111 Appendix C Brief Biographies of Architects 118 2 I. Introduction The Mid 20th Century Architecture in New Hampshire Context: 1945‐1975 was prepared by Lisa Mausolf, Preservation Consultant, under contract for the New Hampshire Department of Employment Security. The context was prepared as mitigation for the sale of the Employment Security building at 32 South Main Street in Concord. The modern curtain wall structure was designed by Manchester architects Koehler & Isaak in 1958. A colorful landmark on South Main Street, discussion of the architectural significance of the building draws commentary ranging from praise “as an excellent example of mid‐ century Modern architecture and ideals of space, form, and function”1 to derision, calling it one of the ugliest buildings in Concord. NH Department of Employment Security, 32 South Main Street, Concord (1958) The Mid 20th Century Architecture in New Hampshire Context was prepared in order to begin work on a framework to better understand the state’s modern architectural resources. The report focuses primarily on high‐style buildings, designed by architects, and excludes residential structures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Journal of Massachusetts
    The Historical Journal of Massachusetts “Yankee Brutalism: Concrete Architecture in New England, 1957-1977.” Author: Brian M. Sirman Source: Historical Journal of Massachusetts, Volume 44, No. 2, Summer 2016, pp. 2-21. Published by: Institute for Massachusetts Studies and Westfield State University You may use content in this archive for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the Historical Journal of Massachusetts regarding any further use of this work: [email protected] Funding for digitization of issues was provided through a generous grant from MassHumanities. Some digitized versions of the articles have been reformatted from their original, published appearance. When citing, please give the original print source (volume/number/date) but add "retrieved from HJM's online archive at http://www.westfield.ma.edu/historical-journal/. 2 Historical Journal of Massachusetts • Summer 2016 Boston University Law Tower (Sert, Jackson & Gourley, 1963) Sert, Jackson & Gourley also designed the Mugar Library and George Sherman Union on campus, all in the Brutalist style. Photo by the author. 3 PHOTO ESSAY Yankee Brutalism: Concrete Architecture in New England, 1957–1977 BRIAN M. SIRMAN Abstract: During the 1960s and early 1970s, New England departed from architectural traditions and was in the vanguard of the most current (and controversial) style of these decades: Brutalism. While on its surface this style seems inimical to New England architecture, a confluence of economic, political, and social forces rendered it aptly suited to the region at this pivotal time. Concrete buildings served not only functional purposes but also as monuments that both reflected and shaped public perceptions of New England.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Friends in Modern Architecture, 1949-1987”
    Title: “The politics of friends in modern architecture, 1949-1987” Name of candidate: Igea Santina Troiani, B. Arch, B. Built Env. Supervisor: Professor Jennifer Taylor This thesis was submitted as part of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Design, Queensland University of Technology in 2005 i Key words Architecture - modern architecture; History – modern architectural history, 1949-1987; Architects - Alison Smithson, Peter Smithson, Denise Scott Brown, Robert Venturi, Elia Zenghelis, Rem Koolhaas, Philosophy - Jacques Derrida, Politics of friendship; Subversive collaboration ii Abstract This thesis aims to reveal paradigms associated with the operation of Western architectural oligarchies. The research is an examination into “how” dominant architectural institutions and their figureheads are undermined through the subversive collaboration of younger, unrecognised architects. By appropriating theories found in Jacques Derrida’s writings in philosophy, the thesis interprets the evolution of post World War II polemical architectural thinking as a series of political friendships. In order to provide evidence, the thesis involves the rewriting of a portion of modern architectural history, 1949-1987. Modern architectural history is rewritten as a series of three friendship partnerships which have been selected because of their subversive reaction to their respective establishments. They are English architects, Alison Smithson and Peter Smithson; South African born architect and planner, Denise Scott Brown and North American architect, Robert Venturi; and Greek architect, Elia Zenghelis and Dutch architect, Rem Koolhaas. Crucial to the undermining of their respective enemies is the friends’ collaboration on subversive projects. These projects are built, unbuilt and literary. Warring publicly through the writing of seminal texts is a significant step towards undermining the dominance of their ideological opponents.
    [Show full text]
  • The Museum of Modern Art's "What Is Modern?" Series, 1938-1969
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 2012 The Museum of Modern Art's "What Is Modern?" Series, 1938-1969 Jennifer Tobias The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1933 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] i THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART’S WHAT IS MODERN? SERIES, 1938–1969 BY JENNIFER TOBIAS A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Art History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2012 ii © 2012 JENNIFER TOBIAS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Art History in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Dr. Rosemarie Haag Bletter [Bletter sig] Date Chair of Examining Committee Dr. Kevin Murphy [EO sig] Date Executive Officer Dr. Rose-Carol Long Dr. Claire Bishop Dr. Mary Anne Staniszewski Supervisory Committee THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iv Abstract THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART’S WHAT IS MODERN? SERIES, 1938–1969 by Jennifer Tobias Adviser: Professor Rosemarie Haag Bletter Between 1938 and 1969, the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) poses the question of What Is Modern? (WIM) in a series of books, traveling exhibitions, and a symposium.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Management Plan Aug 09
    Conservation Management Plan For The National Theatre August 2009 Haworth Tompkins Conservation Management Plan for the National Theatre August 2009 Haworth Tompkins Ltd 19-20 Great Sutton Street London EC1V 0DR Front Cover: Haworth Tompkins Ltd 2008 Theatre Square entrance, winter - HTL 2008 Foreword When, in December 2007, Time Out magazine celebrated the National Theatre as one of the seven wonders of London, a significant moment in the rising popularity of the building had occurred. Over the decades since its opening in 1976, Denys Lasdun’s building, listed Grade II* in 1994. has come to be seen as a London landmark, and a favourite of theatre-goers. The building has served the NT company well. The innovations of its founders and architect – the ampleness of the foyers, the idea that theatre doesn’t start or finish with the rise and fall of the curtain – have been triumphantly borne out. With its Southbank neighbours to the west of Waterloo Bridge, the NT was an early inhabitant of an area that, thirty years later, has become one of the world’s major cultural quarters. The river walk from the Eye to the Design Museum now teems with life - and, as they pass the National, we do our best to encourage them in. The Travelex £10 seasons and now Sunday opening bear out the theatre’s 1976 slogan, “The New National Theatre is Yours”. Greatly helped by the Arts Council, the NT has looked after the building, with a major refurbishment in the nineties, and a yearly spend of some £2million on fabric, infrastructure and equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Signature Redacted
    A GUIDE TO SOURCE MATERIALS OF THE LIFE AND WORK OF LAWRENCE B. ANDERSON '30 by VICTORIA LAGUETTE Bachelor of Science in Art and Design Massachusetts Institute of Technology Submitted to the Department of ARCHITECTURE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY February 1998 Copyright 1998 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. Signature of Signature redacted author Department of Architecture 16 January 1998 Certified Signature redacted by~--~--~------~------------_.._ _____ --t-.,_,..Mt-~------+---------~ ! Mar~ Jarzombek Associate Professor of Hi lt ry and Architecture Thesis Supervisor Accepted Signature redacted -..&._______ - __ -___ - ________ ~~ by____________________________ ___. ____ I Roy J. Strickland Associate Professor of Architecture Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Students LaGuette/Guide to Lawrence B. Anderson THESIS READERS I would like to acknowledge the following two readers who have been extremely helpful to me in formulating and completing this thesis Stanford Anderson Professor of History and Architecture Chairman, Department of Architecture Imre Halasz Professor of Architecture Emeritus Senior Lecturer A GUIDE TO SOURCE MATERIALS OF THE LIFE AND WORK OF LAWRENCE B. ANDERSON '30 by VICTORIA LAGUETTE Submitted to the Department of Architecture on 16 January 1998 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science ABSTRACT From 1933 to 1976, Professor Lawrence B. Anderson taught in the MIT Department of Architecture, and from 1947 to 1971, he served as its chairman and dean. Concurrently, from 1937 to 1972, he was principal partner in the architecture firm that designed the first important modern building on an American university campus in 1939.
    [Show full text]
  • A Catalog: “Main Street Is Almost Alright” Robert Venturi and Denise Scott
    A catalog: “Main street is almost alright” Robert Venturi and Denise Scott Brown, Vanna Venturi House, 1966, near Philadelphia, PA . 1 Compositional balance on garden façade is achieved via unbalanced individual elements Interior living room and staircase Venturi’s “Duck” vs. “Decorated Shed” concept (1968) (Gerhard Kallmann and Michael McKinnell, Boston City Hall, 1963-1968, may have been what they had in mind when they sketched their cartoon duck/building) 2 Martin Maurer, retail shop for ducks and duck eggs, 1930s, Eastern Long Island Robert Venturi and Denise Scott Brown, unbuilt project for a Football Hall of Fame, 1970 The building as decorated shed Phillip Johnson, AT&T Headquarters, New York City, 1984 3 Peter Eisenman, House VI, 1970, Connecticut ‘First floor of Schröder House’ Gerrit Rietveld (1888–1964) Netherlands 1924 Pencil, ink, watercolour on collotype 83.5 x 86.8cm Centraal Museum, Utrecht Le Corbusier, Pavilion de Esprit Nouveau, Paris, 1925 4 Peter Eisenman, study diagrams for House VI; contemporary study of window glazing and circulation Richard Meier, Getty Center, Los Angeles, 1986-96 Charles Moore’s Piazza d’Italia, New Orleans, 1975-79 5 Charles Moore’s Piazza d’Italia, New Orleans, 1975-79 . James Stirling and Michael Wolford’s New State Gallery (“Neue Staatsgalerie”) in Stuttgart, Germany, 1984 6 Site plan and plan of Neue Staatsgalerie compared with plan of Le Corbusier’s Palace of Assembly in Chandigarh Quotations from classical planning, but also modern movements like hi-tech and buildings like the Pompidou Centre and the Johnson Wax Building by Frank Lloyd Wright (1938, below right) .
    [Show full text]
  • The Half-Life of Buildings
    The Half-Life of Buildings Are “great” buildings still great THETERM “instant classic” is often used to describe a new building, but how forty years later? long does architecture really last? Time can be cruel to bestselling authors (who today reads Thomas B. Costain or Grace Metalious?), hit movies (tried to watch “The Ten Commandments” lately?), and popular fashions (remember bell-bottom trousers and Nehru jackets?). Are build- ings immune? Perhaps the most graphic example of short-lived greatness currently in the news is Boston City Hall. In 1962, Boston held a national architectural competition for a new city hall, attracting 256 entries. Gerhard Kallmann, Michael McKinnell, WITOLDRYBCZYNSKI and Edward Knowles, all Columbia REVIEW 9 7 University professors, came out of prover- safe political ground in making this sug- bial nowhere to win. Their design was a gestion, for City Hall was unpopular bold interpretation of what is sometimes among both the people who worked in it called the Brutalist style, then very much and the general public. Employees disliked in vogue. Brutalism (derived from the the labyrinthine interior, complained French béton brut, or raw concrete) was about inadequate heating in winter, and popularized by the French architect Le blamed dampness and mold for sick- Corbusier in the late 1950s in buildings building syndrome. Most Bostonians dis- such as the Unité d’Habitation in liked the architecture. People tolerate Marseilles and the Indian state capital of International-Style modernism as “func- Chandigarh. Brutalism’s chief hallmarks tional” and “clean,” but Brutalist architects were monumental forms, a superhuman indulged in heroic sculptural effects that scale, and above all the extensive use of had nothing to do with function, and the exposed concrete, inside and out.
    [Show full text]