Mutation Research 567 (2004) 109–149 www.elsevier.com/locate/reviewsmr Community address: www.elsevier.com/locate/mutres Review Mutagens in surface waters: a review
Takeshi Ohea,*, Tetsushi Watanabeb, Keiji Wakabayashic
aDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Kyoto Women’s University, 35 Kitahiyoshi-cho, Imakumano, Higashiyama-ku, Kyoto 605-8501, Japan bDepartment of Public Health, Kyoto Pharmaceutical University, 5 Nakauchicho, Misasagi, Yamashina-ku, Kyoto 607-8414, Japan cCancer Prevention Basic Research Project, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 1-1 Tsukiji 5-chome, Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
Received 29 March 2004; received in revised form 24 August 2004; accepted 25 August 2004 Available online 21 November 2004
Abstract
A review of the literature on the mutagenicity/genotoxicity of surface waters is presented in this article. Subheadings of this article include a description of sample concentration methods, mutagenic/genotoxic bioassay data, and suspected or identified mutagens in surface waters published in the literature since 1990. Much of the published surface water mutagenicity/ genotoxicity studies employed the Salmonella/mutagenicity test with strains TA98 and/or TA100 with and/or without metabolic activation. Among all data analyzed, the percentage of positive samples toward TA98 was approximately 15%, both in the absence and the presence of S9 mix. Those positive toward TA100 were 7%, both with and without S9 mix. The percentage classified as highly mutagenic (2500–5000 revertants per liter) or extremely mutagenic (more than 5000 revertants per liter) was approximately 3–5% both towards TA98 and TA100, regardless of the absence or the presence of S9 mix. This analysis demonstrates that some rivers in the world, especially in Europe, Asia and South America, are contaminated with potent direct- acting and indirect-acting frameshift-type and base substitution-type mutagens. These rivers are reported to be contaminated by either partially treated or untreated discharges from chemical industries, petrochemical industries, oil refineries, oil spills, rolling steel mills, untreated domestic sludges and pesticides runoff. Aquatic organisms such as teleosts and bivalves have also been used as sentinels to monitor contamination of surface water with genotoxic chemicals. DNA modifications were analyzed for this purpose. Many studies indicate that the 32P-postlabeling assay, the single cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay and the micronucleus test are sensitive enough to monitor genotoxic responses of indigenous aquatic organisms to environmental pollution. In order to efficiently assess the presence of mutagens in the water, in addition to the chemical analysis, mutagenicity/ genotoxicity assays should be included as additional parameters in water quality monitoring programs. This is because according to this review they proved to be sensitive and reliable tools in the detection of mutagenic activity in aquatic environment. Many attempts to identify the chemicals responsible for the mutagenicity/genotoxicity of surface waters have been reported. Among these reports, researchers identified heavy metals, PAHs, heterocyclic amines, pesticides and so on. By combining the blue cotton hanging method as an adsorbent and the O-acetyltransferase-overproducing strain as a sensitive strain for
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +81 75 531 7124; fax: +81 75 531 7170. E-mail address: [email protected] (T. Ohe).
1383-5742/$ – see front matter # 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.08.003 110 T. Ohe et al. / Mutation Research 567 (2004) 109–149 aminoarenes, Japanese researchers identified two new type of potent frameshift-type mutagens, formed unintentionally, in several surface waters. One group has a 2-phenylbenzotriazole (PBTA) structure, and seven analogues, PBTA-type mutagens, were identified in surface waters collected at sites below textile dyeing factories and municipal wastewater treatment plants treating domestic wastes and effluents. The other one has a polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) skelton with nitro and amino substitution group and it was revealed to be 4-amino-3,30-dichloro-5,40-dinitrobiphenyl derived from chemical plants treating polymers and dye intermediates. However, the identification of major putative mutagenic/genotoxic compounds in most surface waters with high mutagenic/genotoxic activity in the world have not been performed. Further efforts on chemical isolation and identification by bioassay-directed chemical analysis should be performed. # 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Mutagenicity/genotoxicity assays; Mutagens; Surface waters; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs); Heterocyclic amines (HCAs); PBTA-type mutagens; 4-Amino-3,30-dichloro-5,40-dinitrobiphenyl
Contents
1. Introduction ...... 110
2. Sample concentration of surface waters for mutagenicity/genotoxicity assays ...... 115
3. Review of published mutagenicity/genoxicity assessment data of surface waters ...... 122 3.1. Salmonella/mutagenicity data...... 122 3.1.1. Mutagenic features of surface waters with Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA100 ...... 122 3.1.2. Mutagenic features of surface waters with nitroreductase- and/or O-acetyltransferase-overexpressing strains ...... 127 3.2. SOS chromotest/umu-test and other bacterial assay...... 128 3.3. DNA adduct formation ...... 129 3.4. DNA strand breaks ...... 131 3.5. Micronucleus induction ...... 133 3.6. Other assessment methods ...... 135
4. Suspected or identified mutagens in surface waters ...... 136
5. Summary ...... 138 5.1. Mutagenic/genotoxic bioassay data on surface waters ...... 138 5.2. Suspected or identified mutagens/genotoxins in surface waters...... 141
6. Conclusion ...... 141
Acknowledgements ...... 142
References...... 142
1. Introduction which contain many unknown compounds, are used as a source of drinking water, as well as for agricultural, Surface waters, such as rivers, lakes and seas, recreational and religious activities around the world. receive large quantities of waste water from industrial, Consequently, water pollution can be a serious public agricultural, and domestic sources, including muni- health and aquatic ecosystem problem [1–6]. The US cipal sewage treatment plants. These surface waters, EPA’s Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) for 2001 T. Ohe et al. / Mutation Research 567 (2004) 109–149 111
Table 1 Toxics release inventory (TRI) total surface water discharges and total air emissions for all chemicals by industry in the United States in the year of 2001a Industry type Total water releases ( 103 kg) Total air emissions ( 103 kg) Chemical and allied products 26117.1 103348.6 Food and related products 25018.2 25463.3 Primary metal smelting and processing 20262.5 26132.9 Petroleum refining and related industries 7752.9 21849.6 Paper and allied products 7500.9 71283.5 Electric, gas, and sanitary services 1596.5 325492.4 Electronic and other electrical equipment 1332.2 5770.3 Fabricated metal products 790.8 18346.9 Photographic, medical, and optical goods 646.1 3250.9 Coal mining and coal mine services 344.8 348.7 Tobacco products 241.7 1130.3 Metal mining (e.g., Fe, Cu, Pb, Zn, Au, Ag) 193.8 1294.8 Transportation equipment manufacture 89.9 30251.4 Textile mill products 79.6 2603.9 Stone, clay, glass, and concrete products 73.5 14181.8 Leather and leather products 56.6 547.7 Plastic and rubber products 32.2 34973.1 Solvent recovery operations (under RCRAb) 10.7 442.0 Lumber and wood products 9.0 13825.1 Industrial and commercial machinery 8.2 3755.7 Petroleum bulk stations and terminals 5.1 9600.4 Chemical wholesalers 0.8 569.0 Furniture and fixtures 0.3 3548.9 Printing, publishing, and related industries 0.1 8750.2 Apparel <0.1 155.7 No reported SIC code 483.2 1528.3 Miscellaneous manufacturing 16.6 3068.5 Total 100153.0 761763.6 a http://www.epa.gov/triexplorer/industry.htm. b The US Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. reported that more than 100,000 metric tonnes of activity as shown in Table 2 [8–10]. These carcinogens chemicals are released into surface waters and are categorized into two types: persistent compounds, approximately 762,000 metric tonnes of chemicals which include metals and polycyclic aromatic are emitted into the atmosphere annually by industrial compounds; and volatile compounds. Most chemicals use in the United States as shown in Table 1 [7]. This emitted into the atmosphere eventually reach the data show that large quantities of toxic materials are ground or surface waters through deposition, so these routinely released directly or indirectly (via airborne TRI results show that surface waters are readily emission) into aquatic systems after industrial usage. contaminated with a variety of known mutagenic or Table 1 also notes that more than fifty percent of genotoxic carcinogens. annual water discharges to aquatic systems come from Mutagenic/genotoxic compounds, including carci- the chemical, metal smelting and processing, and nogens, whether known or unknown, become the petroleum refining industries. Moreover, 800 metric components of complex environmental mixtures that tonnes of chemicals released into surface waters and can have adverse health effects on humans and 60,000 metric tonnes of chemicals emitted into the indigenous biota [11]. We know quite a lot about atmosphere are carcinogens ranked as 1, 2A or 2B identified contaminants, and it is relatively easy to under the IARC classification system, and most of study the sources and fate of those contaminants that them are known to have mutagenic and/or clastogenic have been identified as priorities for concern and 112 T. Ohe et al. / Mutation Research 567 (2004) 109–149 control. Post-emission fate and behavior of polycyclic of surface water and aquatic biota conducted in the late aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in complex mixtures 1970s, Parry et al. [13] reported on mutagenicity including surface waters have widely investigated studies on the tissue of the mussel Mytilus edulis in the throughout the world, because PAHs are identified marine environment, and Pelon et al. [14] reported on contaminants and are relatively easy to study the the mutagenicity/genotoxicity of Mississippi River sources and fate [12]. However, few studies have water samples by the Salmonella assay developed by investigated the identification of novel putative Ames et al. [15]. Cytogenic damage in fish exposed to mutagens and the quantification of their response the industrially contaminated Rhine River were also concentrations. observed [16,17]. Since 1980, many researchers have On the other hand, the use of short-term bioassays, assessed mutagenicity/genotoxicity of surface waters which can detect a wide range of chemical substances using a variety of bioassays and analytical methods that may produce genetic damage, has permitted the from the standpoint of determining the potential quantification of mutagenic hazard without a priori contribution to the mutagenic hazards of treated information about identity or physical–chemical drinking water and potential ecological hazard. property. In studies of the mutagenicity/genotoxicity Collectively, mutagenicity evaluations of surface
Table 2 TRI water releases and air emissions of carcinogens in the United States in the year of 2001a Compound Mutagenicity/ Carcinogenicityc Total water Total air clastogenicitya,b releasesd ( 103 kg) emissionse ( 106 kg) Lead compoundsf ## 2B 164.3 569.0 Formaldehyde +++/## 2A 152.5 4,800.1 Nickel compoundsg ++/## 1 111.1 455.7 Chromium compoundsh +++/## 1 80.9 304.4 Acetaldehyde +++/## 2B 71.4 5,397.6 Arsenic compoundsi +/## 1 64 – 1,4-Dioxane +j/# 2B 36.9 – Cobalt compoundsk ++/## 2B 21.8 – N,N-Dimethylformamide ++/# 3 17 242.6 Benzene +++/## 1 9.6 2,673.8 Chloroform +/## 2B 8.6 647.6 Catechol ++/# 2B 7.8 – Polycyclic aromatic compoundsl 7.4 519.9 Benz(a)anthracene +++/## 2A Benzo(a)pyrene +++/## 2A Benzo(b)fluoranthene +/# 2B Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene ++/## 2A Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene + 2B Dibenz(a,h)acridine + 2B Beryllium compoundsm ++/# 1 4.6 – Ethylbenzene +n 2B 4 2,969.9 Epichlorohydrin ++/## 2A 3.5 – Diaminotoluene (mixed isomers) 2Bo 2.7 – Dichloromethane ++/## 2B 2.2 9,778.4 Ethylene oxide +++/## 1 2.1 – Styrene +++/## 2B 1.4 21,077.0 Cadmium compoundsp ++/## 1 1.1 – Creosote ++ 2A 1.1 – Trichloroetylene + 2A – 3,741.9 Vinyl acetate # 2B – 1,303.9 Tetrachloroetylene 2A – 1,213.2 1,3-Butadiene ## 2A – 973.0 T. Ohe et al. / Mutation Research 567 (2004) 109–149 113
Table 2 (Continued ) Compound Mutagenicity/ Carcinogenicityc Total water Total air clastogenicitya,b releasesd ( 103 kg) emissionse ( 106 kg) Acrylnitrile +++ 2A – 424.5 Chloroprene +++/## 3 – 386.5 Vinyl chloride +++/## 1 – 332.1 Total 776.0 57811.1 a Based on data from references [8–10]. b , compounds for which there is no evidence of mutagenicity or clastogenicity; +, mutagenic in bacterial and/or fungal/yeast cells in vitro; ++, also mutagenic in plants or animal cells in vitro; +++, also mutagenic in the Drosophila melanogaster somatic mutation and recombination test, and/or sex-linked recessive lethal test, and/or transgenic rodent assays, and/or rodent dominant lethal test. For cytogenetic endpoints, # refers to substances are clastogenic in in vitro or in vivo assays, ## refers to substances that are clastogenic both in vitro and in vivo. Note: In some instances conflicting results have been reported in the literature. c IARC classification system: 1—carcinogenic to humans, 2A—probably carcinogenic to humans, 2B—possibly carcinogenic to humans, 3—inadequate or limited evidence of carcinogenicity in experimental animals. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, volumess 11, 15, 16, 23, 32, 47, 49, 52, 54, 58, 60, 62, 63, 71, 73, 77, and supplements 6 and 7. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France. d >1000 kg only. e >3 1000 kg only. f Various compounds. g Nickel(II) salts (e.g., NiCl2) and insoluble crystalline nickel (e.g., Ni3S2). h Hexavalent chromium compounds only (e.g., K2Cr2O7,K2CrO4). i Both the +3 and +5 oxidation states are clastogenic in vitro. j Rodent dominant lethal assay only. k Cobalt (II) salts only (e.g., CoCl2). l The TRI lists PACs (polycyclic aromatic compounds) as a category of 19 individual compounds. A list of compounds included is available at http://www.epa.gov/tri/chemical/chemlist2001.pdf. m Primarily beryllium (II) compounds (e.g., BeSO4). n Animal cells only. o Only 2,4-diaminotoluene evaluated. p Cadmium (II) salts only (e.g., CdCl2). water provide an indication of potential hazard in the and Rasmussen [4] noted that volumetric emissions absence of priority knowledge about the identification from municipal wastewater treatment plants in large or physical/chemical properties of the putative urban centers often exceed 109 l per day. As a result, toxicants. The Salmonella mutagenicity assay in genotoxic loadings from municipal wastewater treat- particular has been widely used to detect mutagenic ment facilities are often far greater than those of activity in complex environmental mixtures such as industrial facilities, and there is a strong relationship surface waters, especially river waters. between a measure of human activity (i.e., population) In the early 1990s, Stahl [18], De Flora et al. [19] and surface water genotoxicity. The work of Houk [1] and Houk [1] reviewed the genotoxic and/or carcino- and White et al. [3–6] implicated a wide range of genic hazards of natural waters, the marine environ- industries in the release of complex mutagenic ment, and industrial wastes and effluents. Houk [1] mixtures for which the identity of the putative and Stahl [18] demonstrated that genotoxic organic mutagens is not known. On the other hand, some compounds can enter surface waters from a wide range researchers have reported that conventional waste- of industrial and municipal sources by summarizing water purification processes do not effectively remove their genotoxic data performed by short-term genetic many chemical contaminants, and treatment may bioassays on literature. They also stressed the actually increase the mutagenicity/genotoxicity of importance of bioassays to detect mutagenicity/ waste waters [2,20–23]. Other studies show a sharp genotoxicity arising from the ubiquity of genotoxic rise in the mutagenicity/genotoxicity of water samples compounds in the environment and the necessity of the collected at sites downstream from wastewater identification of the sources of contaminants. White treatment plants [24,25]. Consequently, the increasing 114 T. Ohe et al. / Mutation Research 567 (2004) 109–149 use of contaminated surface waters and an increase in from 128 publications. Published mutagenicity/geno- the magnitude of the contamination pose a serious toxicity assessments were divided into two major problem for the health and welfare of humans and categories: bacterial assays, including the Salmonella indigenous aquatic biota. Thus, appropriate bioassay mutagenicity test, and the SOS Chromotest and have been needed for evaluation of surface waters on Salmonella umu-test; and aquatic organism and plant potential hazard to human and the water environment. assays, including the micronucleus assay, 32P-post- The purpose of this review is to summarize the state labelling, the comet assay and the alkaline unwinding of the current literature on mutagenicity/genotoxicity assay. The 32P-postlabeling assay, DNA strand breaks data for surface waters and to lead the most profitable and the micronucleus test are unique in that they can directions for future research in order to control and be utilized in the laboratory setting, or they can be manage effectively our water environment. In this taken to the site for in situ monitoring using fishes or review, we will focus on a synopsis of the plants that inhabit regions contaminated by industrial mutagenicity/genotoxicity assay data in surface and municipal wastewater. Genotoxic parameters (e.g. waters in the scientific literature published since hepatic DNA adducts) are currently the most valuable 1990. Subheadings include a description of sample biomarkers for environmental risk assessment and concentration methods, mutagenic/genotoxic bioassay there are many reports on the studies linking the DNA data, and suspected or identified mutagens in surface damage to subsequent molecular, cellular and tissue- waters. In most cases, surface waters have been level alteration of aquatic organisms. In this paper, we administered in their crude extracts to these biological intended to review the studies in which bioassays with test system. Fig. 1 illustrates a breakdown of the DNA alterations, e.g. mutagenicity, DNA damaging collected surface water mutagenicity/genotoxicity activity and chromosome aberration, as their end- assays. Results from 178 published mutagenicity/ points were used to evaluate contamination of surface genotoxicity assays of surface waters were obtained water with genotoxic chemicals. The studies on the
Fig. 1. Breakdown of mutagenicity/genotoxicity assays for surface waters (n = 178). The number of assays used in 128 scientific literatures published since 1990 was summed, and the percentage of each bioassay heading was calculated. Data sources are provided in Tables 3 and 5–8. T. Ohe et al. / Mutation Research 567 (2004) 109–149 115 tumor incidence or the incidence of idiopathic lesions, widely used. However, the liquid–liquid extracted including oncogene activation, link to mutagens water samples showed fewer mutagenic responses exposure in aquatic organisms are not cited. compared with XAD-concentrated ones [54,55, 77,104]. Blue cotton, developed by Hayatsu [102], a solid 2. Sample concentration of surface waters for matrix bearing covalently linked copper phthalocya- mutagenicity/genotoxicity assays nine trisulfonate can selectively adsorb polycyclic planar-type compounds with three or more fused Mutagenicity/genotoxicity data of surface waters rings. Sakamoto and Hayatsu [24] collected mutagens performed using the bacterial assays are summarized by hanging blue rayon, which contains 2–3 times more in Table 3. There are many varieties of monitoring ligands than blue cotton per unit weight, in the Katsura methods combined with mutagenicity/genotoxicity and Yodo Rivers, Japan. They demonstrated that the tests and selective extraction methodologies for blue rayon hanging method is easy to perform and is identifying the possible classes of mutagenic/geno- suitable for qualitative screening of the mutagenicity toxic organic contaminants in surface waters. A monitoring of river water. The blue rayon/cotton discussion of different extraction/concentration meth- hanging method, in which blue rayon or blue cotton as ods has been presented in detail by Houk [1] and Stahl an adsorbent is hung in the flowing water, has distinct [18]. We describe here briefly the sample concentra- advantages over the conventional method of transport- tion methods used for bacterial mutagencity/geno- ing large volumes of water to the laboratory for toxicity assays. Although mutagenic potency can be bioassay. Although this technique is semiquantitative detected in non-concentrated samples of surface and cannot provide measures of contamination per waters in many cases [30,34,36,44,46–48,83,86,88, unit volume, it is suitable for collecting large amounts 89,92–94], each contaminant is usually present at such of target substances and chemicals flowing in the river low levels that it is difficult to detect, and therefore for long periods (usually 24 h). It should be noted that some sort of extraction/concentration method is it is a 1-day time-integrated value, as distinguished required for reliable mutagencity/genotoxicity assess- from an instant spot value obtainable in the conven- ment of surface water samples. Concentration/extrac- tional XAD-resin concentration method or liquid– tion methods include liquid–liquid extraction, solid liquid extraction method [24,52]. In addition, this phase extraction and other types of column chroma- method can be easily applied to a wide range of tography, as well as the blue rayon/cotton hanging mutagenicity/genotoxicity monitoring approaches method [102]. [65,85] and can collect large quantities of unknown Adsorption on Amberlite XAD resins is the most polycyclic planar chemicals dissolved at ppt-levels commonly applied method for concentrating organic (i.e., ng/l), as can be seen in the case of PBTA-1 and substances from different kinds of surface waters. PBTA-2 [61,64]. For the quantititative determination XAD resin can generally adsorb a broad class of of mutagenicity/genotoxicity of surface waters, blue mutagenic compounds, including polycyclic aro- rayon can be packed in a glass column, and the water matic hydrocarbons, arylamines, nitro-compounds, sample is passed through in an identical manner to quinolines, anthraquinones, etc. Adsorption, fol- that carried out with the XAD resin column lowed by elution with organic solvents, is efficient at [25,93,105]. extracting all the polar and nonpolar toxic chemicals The blue-chitin column method, a short column and mutagens/genotoxins [103]. Using the XAD technique for concentrating mutagens/genotoxins, is resin column method, many positive results were also suitable for qualitative screening of river water observed when those extracts were tested in the mutagenicity resulting from polycyclics [59,76,106]. bacterial mutagenicity assays [28,29,31,33–37,40, Other solid adsorbents including Separon SE [27,38] 42,44,45,50,54,55,57–59,69,72,77,78,87,90,92,93, and Silica C18 [41,43] have also been utilized to 95,96]. extract less hydrophilic chemicals in surface waters, Liquid–liquid extraction using organic solvents and substances adsorbed on the resins were eluted with provides valuable quanititative information and is organic solvents. In all cases, organic solvent extracts 116 T. Ohe et al. / Mutation Research 567 (2004) 109–149 [26] [29] Reference [27] [28] [30] [31] [32] [35] [36] [33] [34] [37] uent, fl uents of a fl -Toluidine, nitroquin- polyethoxylated nonyl phenols and its brominated derivatives – Suspected mutagen/likely sources Discharges of chemical plant with no wastewater treatment – o oline, nitroaniline, dichlorobenzidine, several aromatic quinines – Chemical industry Municipal waste dump, untreated ef Industry, municipal waste dump, agricultural area municipal waste dump – small local industry, agricultural area Ef petrohemical plant S9, S9), S9, S9, +S9) S9) S9, +S9) S9, +S9), S9, +S9), S9), negative, S9), b S9, +S9) S9, +S9), high; S9, +S9) S9, +S9) S9, +S9), TA100 cation fi S9, +S9), dissolved: S9, +S9) Positive Alklbenzene sulfonate, Low; TA98 ( TA100 ( classi low; TA98 (+S9) Positive TA98 ( ( TA100 ( dissolved: TA98 ( TA100 ( low; TA98 (+S9), +S9), low; TA98 (+S9), negative, TA98 ( low; TA98 ( TA98 (+S9), TA100 ( TA100 ( +S9), TA100 ( /strain Mutagenic potency a assay (microtest/TA1535 Ames assay (plate)/TA98, TA100 TA98, TA100 umu pSK1002 Ames assay (pre)/TA98, TA100 Extreme; particulate: Ames assay (plate)/TA98, TA100 Moderate; TA98 (+S9), Ames assay (plate)/TA98, TA100 Low, TA98 ( Ames assay (pre)/TA98, TA100 Moderate; TA100 ( Ames assay (pre)/TA98, TA100 Positive Leaking from the liquid extraction/DCM Ames assay (plate)/TA98, TA100 Moderate; TA100 (+S9), ltration – fi Adsorbates on granular activated carbon/soxhlet extracted with DCM (non volatile fraction) Separone SE/acetone Ames assay (plate)/TA98 Moderate; TA98 ( Rotary evaporation; particulate matter/DMSO, dissolved phase/ XAD-7 resin/acetone; suspended matter XAD-2 resin/DMSO Ames assay (plate)/TA98, TA100 Low, TA98 ( XAD-4/ethanol, ethanol/CH (acidic and neutral) acidic), non-concentrated sample and acidic) Non-concentrated sample; XAD-2/acetone, DCM (acidic and neutral) XAD-2 and XAD-7/acetone Ames assay (plate)/TA98, TA100 Moderate; TA98 ( (Barcelona, Spain) (Czech Republic) Besos River (Barcelona, Spain) Rhine, River Moselle (Germany) (Venetia, Italy) Netherlands) (Slovenia) Channel Badner, Muhlbach Llobregat River Unknown rivers Llobregat River, River Main, River River Po (Italy) XAD-2/acetoneRiver and sea water Microsuspension assay/ Saale River (Germany)Rhine River (The Liquid Ljubljaica River, Sora River Schwechat River, Sora River (Slovenia) XAD-2/acetoneLjubljanica (neutral River and (Slovenia) XAD-2 resin/acetone (neutral Table 3 Mutagenicity/genotoxicity summary data of surface watersSample in source bacterial assay Preparation method Assay method 1. Europe (Austria), Wilga River (Poland) T. Ohe et al. / Mutation Research 567 (2004) 109–149 117 [40] [38] [39] [41] [45] [42] [43] [44] [46] C a Waste from community and industrial sources sewage, wastewater from chemical industries (melting, pesticide, chlorine industry), PAH, chlorinated hydrocarbons – Waste waters from many small towns and factories Industrial or agricultural pollution source Increasing chemical contamination of the natural aquifers – – S9, +S9) S9) S9), S9), TA100 S9), TA100 (+S9), S9, +S9) S9), negative; TA98 TA100 (+S9) ( ( (+S9), TA100 (+S9) moderate; TA98 ( negative; TA100 ( TA98 ( negative; TA100 ( High; YG1024 (+S9)Positive IQ, Trp-P-1, A Positive E. NM2009 E. coli , l S. WP2s BA 9 strain umu S. typhimurium -arabinose L S. typhimurium E. coli Salmonella assay/ 343/753, 343/765 -test/ SOS chromotest Microscreen phage-induction assay/ TH-008 Differential DNA repair test/ coli Ames assay (plate)/TA98, TA100 Low; TA98 ( Ames assay (plate)/TA98, TA100 Low; TA98 (+S9), resistance test)/ typhimurium umu Ames assay (pre)/TA98Ara-test ( Positive Untreated commercial Ames assay (pre)/YG1024 Positive Ames assay (plate) Extreme; TA98 (+S9), Ames assay (pre)/TA98, TA100, YG1024, YG1029 umu TA1535 pSK1002 Ames assay, assay/ typhimurium acetonitrile recommended protocol) matter/soxhlet extraction/ toluene, methanol methanol; lichrolut EN/acetonitrile XAD-2/hexane, acetone Direct dilution by medium Non-concentrated sample; XAD-resin Saale and Rhine Rivers, Teltow Canal (Germany) (Germany) Labe River (Czech Republic) Separon SE/acetone Ames assay (plate)/TA98 Moderate; TA98, Northern Italian lake (Italy) Sep-Pak Plus C18/methanol, Salzach River (Austria) XAD-2, XAD-7 (US EPA Elbe River (Germany) Suspended particulate Como Lake (Italy) XAD-2/acetone Ames assay (pre)/TA98, TA100 High; TA98 (+S9), low; Spree, Havel, Stepenitz, Como Lake (Italy)Rhine River, Elbe River Silica C18/ethyl acetate, Danube River (Austria) Blue rayon hanging method; 118 T. Ohe et al. / Mutation Research 567 (2004) 109–149 [24] [50] [51] [52] [52] [53] [54] [55] Reference [47,48] [49] uents fl uents from fl mutagen discharged from sewage plant sewage plants from sewage plants – – Organochlorinated and organophosphorus pesticides Pesticides Suspected mutagen/likely sources – and aminoarene S9, S9) S9) liquid: S9, +S9) – S9, +S9) liquid: TA98 liquid: TA98 b – – S9, +S9) S9), TA100 (+S9), cation fi S9, +S9), TA100 S9, +S9) S9, +S9), negative; PositveHigh; YG1024 (+S9), moderate; YG1024 ( PAH, ef High; YG1024 (+S9), moderate; YG1024 ( Moderate; liquid TA98 ( Low; liquid (+S9), TA100 ( Moderate; XAD: TA98 ( ( Low; liquid ( TA100 ( Positive Positive Suspected nitroarene classi Extreme; XAD: TA98 ( +S9), TA100 ( Vibrio harvey /strain Mutagenic potency assay/ a Ames assay (plate)/TA98, TA100 Moderate; TA98 (+S9)Ames assay (pre)/TA98, TA98NR, TA98/1,8-DNP6, YG1021, YG1024 Ef YG1024, YG1029 YG1024, YG1029 Ames assay (plate)/TA98, TA100, TA97a, TA102 Vibrio harvey Ames assay (pre)/TA98TA98/1,8-DNP6 High; TA98 (+S9) Unknown 4 potent Ames assay (pre)/TA98, TA100, TA97a, TA102, TA104 liquid extraction/hexane liquid – – OH (pH 2, 4, 8) 4 LH-20/CH, methanol, DCM Blue rayon hanging method Ames assay (pre)/TA98, TA100, Blue rayon hanging method Ames assay (pre)/TA98, TA100, liquid liquid extraction/hexane, chloroform Filtration method; blue rayon batch method DCM, methanol, NH ) Continued and its canal (Bangkok, Thailand) (Tokyo, Japan) Portugal); Aegean Sea (Paralia, Greece); Baltic Sea (Copenhagen, Denmark); North Sea (Oslo, Norway) Yodo River (Japan) Blue rayon hanging method Ames assay (pre)/TA98, TA98NR, Katsura River (Japan)Chao Phraya River Blue rayon adsorbate; Sephadex Sumida and Ara Rivers The Seto Inland Sea (Japan)Ganga River (India) Blue rayon hanging method Ames assay (pre)/TA1024 XAD-4, XAD-8/acetone; Ganga River (India) Moderate; YG2024 (+S9) BaP XAD-4, XAD-8/acetone; Adriatic Sea (Trieste, Italy); Yodo River (Japan)Yodo Blue River rayon (Japan) hanging XAD-2, XAD-4, XAD-8 / Sample source Preparation method Assay method Table 3 ( Atlantic Ocean (Lisbon, 2. Asia T. Ohe et al. / Mutation Research 567 (2004) 109–149 119 [65] [25] [65] [66] [67,68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [65] [60] [61] [63] [64] [59] [62] [57] [58] [56] BaP – municipal wastewater Illegal deposition of chemical waste in the lake BaP MeIQx, PhIP – – Domestic sewage, agricultural and industrial wastewater – S9) S9, S9, +S9) S9, +S9) S9, +S9) Discharges from S9, +S9), PositiveModerate; TA98 ( Trp-P-2 High; TA98 ( negative; TA100 ( positive Extreme; YG1024 (+S9), moderate; YG1024 ( Positive Trp-P-1, Trp-P-2, +S9), low; TA98 ( Positive Positive 1-NP PositivePositive Trp-P-2 S. typhimurium S. typhimurium S. typhimurium S. typhimurium S. typhimurium S. typhimurium assay/ assay/ assay/ Ames assay (pre)/YG1024 Negative BaP umu NM2009, NM2000 TA100 TA98, TA100 Ara test/ BA9 Ames assay (pre)/YG1024 Positive YG1024 Ames assay (pre)/YG1024 negative umu NM2009 TA97a, YG1041, YG1042 umu NM2009 Ames assay (pre)/TA98 moderate (TA98, +S9) NM2009, NM2000 umu assay/ NM2009 liquid extraction/acetone Ames test/TA98, TA100 Moderate; TA100 ( – Blue rayon hanging in water in a beaker Blue rayon hanging method Ames assay (pre)/YG1024 Extreme; YG1024 (+S9) PBTA-5, PBTA-6 water in a beaker blue rayon hanging in water in a beaker XAD-2/diehyl ether; blue chitin column/methanol: conc. ammonia (50:1) XAD-2/diethyl ether Rivers in Japan Blue rayon hanging method Ames assay (pre)/TA100, (Okayama, Japan) Nishitakase River, Uji River (Japan) Sasagase River (Okayama, Japan) River (Japan) Yodo River (Japan)Asahi and Sasagase River Nikko River (Aichi, Japan) Blue rayon column method Blue rayon hanging method Ames assay (pre)/YG1024 Ames assay (pre)/YG1024 Positive Extreme; YG1024 (+S9) PBTA-3 PBTA-1, PBTA-2 Yodo River (Japan)Taihu Lake (China)Nikko River, Uji River (Japan)Tobei Blue River, rayon Asuwa hanging River, Blue method rayon hanging method XAD-2 resin/acetoneTaihu Lake Ames (China) assay (pre)/YG1024 Ames assay (plate)/TA98, Extreme; XAD-2 YG1024 resin/acetone (+S9) PBTA-4 Ames assay (plate)/ Lake Baikal (Russia) Blue rayon hanging in Nishitakase River (Japan)Taihu Lake (China) Blue rayon hanging method Liquid Ames assay (pre)/YG1024 Extreme; YG1024 (+S9) PBTA-1 Nishitakase River (Japan)Kojima Lake, Asahi River, Blue rayon hanging method Ames assay (pre)/YG1024 Extreme; YG1024 (+S9) PBTA-2 Yodo River (Japan) Blue rayon hanging method NakDong River (Korea) Blue rayon hanging method Ames assay (plate)/TA98, Yodo River (Japan)Katsura River, Asahi XAD-2/diethyl ether Yodo River (Japan) Blue rayon column method umu assay/ Yodo River (Japan) Blue rayon hanging method; 120 T. Ohe et al. / Mutation Research 567 (2004) 109–149 Reference [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [81] [80] [82] [83] [84] [85] - - ’ ’ uents fl Suspected mutagen/likely sources PBTA-7, PBTA-8 PBTA-6 PAHs dinitrobiphenyl dichloro-5,4 Pesticides, domestic and industrial waste Municipal wastes and the industrial e barge tankers BaP, Trp-P-1, Trp-P-2 – demonstrated mutagens such as PAH and heavy metals – – S9) 4-Amino-3,3 S9, +S9), S9, +S9), S9) S9) S9, +S9) S9, +S9) b cation fi S9, +S9) S9, +S9) classi ( Extreme; YG1024 (+S9) PBTA-3, PBTA-4, Moderate; TA98 (+S9), negative; TA98 ( Extreme; TA98 ( high; TA100 ( Extreme; TA98 ( high; TA100 ( Positive Moderate; YG1024 ( Positive Positive Not correlated with Negative Moderate; YG1024 (+S9), low; YG1024 ( E. coli /strain Mutagenic potency a TM677) luminescense uctuation test/TA98, fl Salmonella / Salmonella typhimurium YG1029 Ames assay (pre)/TA98, YG1021, YG1024 Ames assay (plate)/TA98, TA100, TA97a, TA102 TA100, TA97a, TA102, TA104 Ames TA100, TA97a, TA102 YG1024, YG1041, YG1042 bacterium Photobacterum SOS Chromotest/ The forward mutation assay typhimurium YG1024, YG1041, ) Mutatox test/ uoride) fl liquid – lter and Blue rayon hanging method Ames assay (pre)/YG1024 Extreme; YG1024 Blue rayon hanging method Ames assay (pre)/YG1024, Blue chitin column/ methanol:conc. ammonia (50:1) Blue rayon hanging method Ames assay (pre)/YG1024 Extreme; YG1024 ( XAD-4, XAD-8/acetone; liquid extraction/hexane, chloroform XAD-8/DMSO Ames assay (plate)/TA98, Blue rayon hanging method Ames assay (plate)/TA100, Flash evaporation (10 Filtered water; particulates/DCM fi bonded-phase sorbent (CN, C18)/soxhlet-extracted/DCM, methanol Blue rayon hanging method Ames assay (plate)/TA98, TA100, ) Continued River (Japan) Kitsune River (Fukui, Japan) (Japan) Japan) India) of Agra, India) (Japan) Canada) system (Canada) Providence River, Charles River Asuwa River, Katsura Mawatari River, Asuwa River, Nagara and other rivers Waka River (Wakayama, River Yamuna (Mathura, River Yamuna (downstream Six rivers in North Kyusyu Galveston Bay (USA)Yamaska River (Quebec, Blue rayon hanging method Ames assay (pre)/TA98 Positive A collision of St. Lawrence River Aberjona River (MS, USA) Poly(vinylidene di St. Lawrence River (Canada); Table 3 ( Sample source Preparation method Assay method 3. North America T. Ohe et al. / Mutation Research 567 (2004) 109–149 121 [48] [86] [87] [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] uence fl nary, steel fi uence of fl – Under the in petrochemical industries petrochemical industrial comples Under the in of industrial complex – Heavily industrialized area (petrochemical, oil re rolling mill, petroleum coke plant, sulfuric acid plant) Wastewater from farming, grazing, domestic sewage, industries – Heavy metals and organic contaminants S9, +S9), S9, +S9), Affected by the S9, +S9), S9, S9, +S9) S9, +S9), S9, +S9), S9, +S9), S9, +S9) S9, +S9) S9) S9, +S9) S9, +S9) S9, +S9) S9), negative; Positive Extreme; TA98 ( TA100 ( High; TA98 (+S9), moderate; TA98 ( TA100 ( Extreme; TA98 ( TA100 ( TA100 ( TA100 (+S9) TA100 ( +S9), TA100 ( Low; TA98 ( TA100 ( Vibrio harvey E. ) assay/ l B/rWP2s( YG1042 Vibrio harvey TA100, TA102 Ames assay (plate)/TA98, TA100 Microsuspension assay/TA98, TA100, TA102 microscreen phage- induction assay/ coli Ames assay (plate)/TA98, TA100 Extreme; TA98 (+S9), Ames assay (plate)/TA98, TA100 Extreme; TA98 ( Ames assay (pre)/TA1535, TA97, TA98, TA100, TA102 liquid extraction/DMC liquid extraction/ liquid – – – ltration Filtration Ames assay (pre)/TA98, Filtration XAD-2 resin/methanol, DCM Direct assay Ames assay (plate)/TA98 Extreme; TA98 ( Non-concentrated sample; liquid extraction/DCM (acidic, basic, neutral); volatile substances extraction method XAD-2/DMSO (pH 2) Ames assay (plate)/TA98, TA100 Low; TA98 ( Liquid (acidic, neutral) Filtration; XAD-2 Ames assay (plate)/TA98, TA100 Low; TA98 ( DCM; XAD resin/DCM, methanol; fi method c Ocean (Monerey, fi East River (USA) Guaiba River (Brazil) MD, USA), Paci CA, USA) State (Brasil) Guaiba River (Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil) Guaiba River (Brazil) Argentina) Berisso (Argentina) (Buenos Aires, (Argentina) Potomac River, Hudson River, Cai River, a tributary of the Atlantic Ocean (Annapolis, Water courses of Sao Paulo Cai River, a tributary of the Cai River, a tributory of the Rio Tercero River (Cordoba, Canals between Ensenda and Matanza-Riachuelo River Surface waters in Brazil Liquid Sinos River basin (RS, Brasil) Direct concentration 4. South America 122 T. Ohe et al. / Mutation Research 567 (2004) 109–149
were concentrated and exchanged for a solvent that is , and compatible with the selected bioassay (e.g., dimethyl [93] [96] Reference [95] sulfoxide or DMSO). Grifoll et al. [30] reported that the particulate ; Microsuspension
uent matter retained in filter membrane exhibited a stronger fl blue rayon equivalent
[99] mutagenic activity than the dissolved phase. This demonstrates that filtration or sterilization via filter membrane could remove some of the mutagenic . Parenthesis shows the kind of Industrial ef (textile dyeing facility) Suspected mutagen/likely sources – activity. White et al. [5] investigated the sorptive [85] properties of organic genotoxins in industrial effluents and revealed that a substantial fraction (up to 99.8%) of the emitted genotoxicity is associated with S9, +S9) S9, particulate material. Accordingly, the issue of filtra-
S9, +S9), tion and sterilization via filtration membrane of b surface waters are important one since a large portion S9, +S9)