FLDLRAI. ELECi ION COMMISSION

144S S I R1I I N.W

1! THIS IS THE EN4D OF IILR

Date Filmed .244ajLCamera No. --- sJ

Camerama9n UR13. 0 4, FEDERAL ELECTI ON COMM-vISSION

Ivw , A%~

/ .*

The above-described material was removed from this file pursuant to the following exemption provided in the Freedom of Information Act; 5 U.S.C. Section 552(b) I

*(1) Classified Information (6) Personal privacy tn (2) Internal rules and (7) Inve stigatory iI' practices files (3) Exempted by other (8) Banking statute information (4) Trade secrets and • (9) Well Information •commercial or (geographic or financial information geophysical) 4- (5) Internal Documents

Signed ~___ date 712;_ r'

FEC 9-21-77 I.. I. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION. WASHINGTON. P.C. 2o3

July 3, 1984

Thomas J. Schwarz, Esquire Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher and Flom 919 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 RE: Pre-MUR 123 and MUR 1699 Dear Mr. Schwarz: On May 18, 1984, the Commission notified your Stein client, the '81 Committee, of a complaint alleging violations of certain sections of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended. This notification followed receipt of memorandum your letter and of May 4, 1984, in which you asked that the Commission address issues later raised in the complaint. The Commission, on July 2 , 1984, determined that on the basis of the information in the complaint and information by your client, provided there is no reason to believe that a violation of any statute within its jurisdiction Accordingly, has been committed. the Commission has closed its file in this matter. It will become a part of the public record within 30 days.

Sincerely, Charles N. Steele /

al Counsel

Associate Gen al Counsel

Enclosure First General Counsel's Report FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20*63'

Thomas J. Schwarz, Esquire Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher and Flom 919 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022

RE: Pre-MUR 123 and MUR 1699 Dear Mr. Schwarz:

On May 18, 1984, the Commission notified your client, the Stein '81 Committee, of a complaint alleging violations of certain sections of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended. This notification followed receipt of your letter and memorandum of May 4, 1984, in which you asked that the Commission address issues later raised in the complaint.

The Commission, on July 2 , 1984, determined that on the basis of the information in the complaint and information provided by your client, there is no reason to believe that a violation of any statute within its jurisdiction has been committed. Accordingly, the Commission has closed its file in this matter. It will become a part of the public record within 30 days.

Sincerely, Charles N. Steele General Counsel

BY: Kenneth A. Gross Associate General Counsel

Enclosure First General Counsel's Report FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON. D.C. 20463

July 3, 1984

George McDonald 211 East Slat Street New York, New York 10028

RE: MUR 1699 Dear Mr. McDonald:

The Federal Election Commission has reviewed the allegations in your complaint dated May 9, 1984, and determined that, on the basis of the information provided in the complaint and information provided by the respondent, there is no reason to believe that a violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended ('the Act"), has been committed. Accordingly, the Commission has decided to close the file in this matter. The Federal Election Campaign Act allows a complainant to seek judicial review of the Commission's dismissal of this action. See 2 U.S.C. S 437g(a) (8).

Should additional information come to your attention which you believe establishes a violation of the Act, you may file a complaint pursuant to the requirements set forth in 2 U.S.C. 0 $ 437g(a) (1)and 11 C.F.R. S 111.4. Nr C"! Sincerely, 4T Charles N. Steele 7? Ge Couns

BY: nes Associate Gene al Counsel

Enclosure First General Counsel's Report FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463.

George McDonald 211 East 81st Street New York, New York 10028 RE: MUR 1699 Dear Mr. McDonald: The Federal Election Commission has reviewed the allegations in your complaint dated May 9, 1984, and determined that, on the basis of the information provided in the complaint and information provided by the respondent, there is no reason to believe that a C5 violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended ("the Act"), has been committed. Accordingly, the Commission has decided to close the file in this matter. The Federal Election Campaign Act allows a complainant to seek judicial review of the. Commission's dismissal of this action. See'2 U.S.C. S 437g(a) (8)., Should additional information come to your attention which you believe establishes a violation of the Act, you may file a complaint pursuant to the requirements set forth in 2 U.S.C. o' $ 437g(a) (1) and 11 C.F.R. S 111.4.

0D Sincerely, Charles N. Steele General Counsel

BY: Kenneth A. Gross Associate General Counsel

Enclosure First General Counsel's Report BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

In the Matter of ) Pre-MUR 123 and MUR 1699 Stein '81 Committee )

CERTIFICATION

I, Marjorie W. Emmons, Secretary of the Federal

Election Commission, do hereby certify that on July 2, 1984, the Commission decided by a vote of 5-0 to take the following actions in Pre-MUR 123 and MUR 1699: 1. Merge Pre-MUR 123 into MUR 1699. 2. Find no reason to believe that Stein '81 has violated the Fderal Election Campaign Act. 3. Send the letters attached to the General Counsel's report dated June 27, 1984.

4. Close the file in this matter. Commissioners Aikens, Elliott, McDonald, McGarry, and Reiche voted affirmatively for the decision; Commissioner Harris did not cast a vote. Attest:

Date Marjorie W. ns Secretary -of the ConmiLision

Received by the Commission Secretary on June 28, 1984 at 9:54 a.m. Circulated to the Commission on.,sune 28, 1984 at 4:00 p.m Deadline for voting: July 2, 134.at 4:00 p.m. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINCTON. D.C. 20463

MEMORANDUM TO: Office of the Commission Secretary FROM: Office of General Counsel DATE: June 28, 1984 PM 123 SUBJECT: & MUR 1699 - First General Counsel's Report

The attached is submitted as an Agenda document for the Commission Meeting of Open Session Closed Session

CIRCULATIONS DISTRIBUTION 48 Hour Tally Vote [x] Compliance [X] Sensitive [x] Non-Sensitive [ ] Audit Matters [ ] 24 Hour No Objection [ ] Litigation C I Sensitive [ ] Non-Sensitive [ ] Closed MUR Letters Information [ ] Status Sheets [I] Sensitive C I Non-Sensitive Advisory Opinions [I] C I Other (see distribution Other below) C I FEDERAL ELECTION CO sU..ON .FFK EIVr 1325 K Street, N.N Washington, D.C. 20463 FIRST GENERAL COUNSEL'S RPOR 8 JUN 28 A9: 55 DATE AND TIME OF T NSMITAL ByOGC Pre-MUR No. 123 TO THE COMMISSION MUR 3. 1 i ~ ~ ~ U I NO,--iI DATE SUA RQS10B

RES ATENTTMay1rON RESPONDENT Maly 18,# 1984TO

COMPLATNANT' S NAME: George McDonald RESPONDENT'S NAME: Stein '81 Committee RELEVANT STATUTES: 2 U.S.C. S 441a(a) 2 U.S.C. S 441b 2 U.S.C. S 433 2 U. S 434 INTERNAL REPORTS CHECKED: MUR I ndex AO Index

SUMMARY OF ALLEGATIONS

On May 4, 1984, counsel for the Stein '81 Committee and the

Stein for Congress Committee submitted to the Commission a

request for an investigation into certain issues involving

expenditures made by Stein '81 which had been cited in the

April 19, 1984, issue of Town and Village as possible violations

of the Federal Election Campaign Act (" the Act"). This request

has been designated Pre-MUR 123. Stein '81 is registered in the

State of New York as Andrew Stein's committee for his 1981

campaign for the presidency of the Borough of Manhattan. The Stein for Congress Committee is Mr. Stein's authorized committee for the 1984 campaign for the U.S. House of Representatives in

the 15th Congressional District of New York. Mr. Stein filed his Statement of Candidacy on February 17, 1984. -2- The specific issues into which counsel for the above committees has requested an investigation are whether any violations of the Act have occurred as the result (1) of the expenditure of surplus campaign funds by Stein '81 for certain mailings, and (2) the repayment of a debt owed D.li. Sawyer and Associates, Ltd. Counsel submitted a copy of the April 19, 1984 issue of Town and Village cited above, as well as a copy of a follow-up article in the same publication dated April 26, 1984, and copies of newspaper articles and of letters, meeting announcements, etc., which assertedly constituted the mailings questioned by Town and Village. On May 15, 1984, the Commission received a complaint dated May 9 from George McDonald which has been designated M4UR 1699. Tn this complaint Mr. McDonald states that reports filed by Stein '81 in 1983 and 1984 show receipt of corporate contributions and of contributions from individuals in excess of $1,000, and that during the same periods no "active re-election campaign for Borough President was being conducted.* The complainant cites allegations that voter lists have been compiled by Stein '81 "which relate only to the 15th Congressional District" and that Stein '81 has paid for mailings exclusively within this district. Attached to the complaint were copies of the Stein '81 financial disclosure reports cited in the complaint and copies of articles from the April 19, April 26, and May 3, 1984, issues of Town and Village. The complainant asserts that "(s) ince the contributions received by Stein '81 are not in compliance with the federal election laws, expenditures in -3- support of a federal election campaign would violate federal law."

LEGAL AND FACTUAL ANALYSTS

The allegations raised in the complaint in MUR 1699 are Identical to the first question posed in Pre-MUR 123, i.e., whether certain expenditures made by Stein '81 in 1983 and 1984 were made for the purpose of influencing Mr. Stein's federal campaign, thus bringing them within the definition of expenditure at 2 U.S.C. S 431(9)(A)(i) and subjecting them to the limitations established by 2 U.S.C. S 441a(a) and to the prohibitions of

2 U.S.C. S 441b. This Office therefore recommends that Pre- MUR 123 be merged into MUR 1699.

Based upon a comparison of dates and figures cited in the Town and Village articles attached to the complaint with expenditures listed in the Stein '81 reports also so attached, the specific expenditures at issue apparently include:

1) Payments made between July, 1983, and January, 1984, to Election Computer Services and to O.S.T., which, according to the Stein '81 report for this period, totalled $9,131.43;

2) Payments made between July, 1983, and January, 1984, for postage which, according to the Stein '81 report for this period, totalled $21,360; 3) Dayments made between July, 1983, and January, 1984, to several vendors for printing which, according to the Stein '81 report for this period, totalled $16,750;

4) Payments made between July, 1983, and January, 1984, to twenty-two individuals in amounts ranging from $150 to $240 for a total of $4,760. The reported purpose of seven of these expenditures is 'computer listf and one of the persons itemized i quoted In Town -ndVilla e, April 19, 1914, as hav5 i at that she checked Board of Election lists for voters In certain years. 5) Payment made between July, 1983, and January, 1984, to the Board of Elections of $257.71 for voter lists. The January 15, 1983, and July, 1983 reports filed by Stein '81 also cite expenditures totaling $3,800 for postage and $2,611.11 for printing.

The complainant in MUR 1699 states that *(m)any of these

payments appear to be of the type that would be primarily in support of Mr. Stein's candidacy for Congress.' He goes on to cite allegations, presumably in Town and Village, that voter lists are being compiled by the Committee which relate only to

the 15th Congressional District. . . . Tn addition, allegations have been made that the Committee had paid for mailings that were made exclusively within the Congressional District.' The article in the April 19, 1984, issue of Town and Village states that according to a named representative of the Board of Elections, voter lists were purchased in May and July, 1983, and "were for downtown.'"

In the memorandum submitted with the request of the Stein '81 Committee that the Commission consider the issues discussed herein, counsel argues that the above-cited expenditures were made with excess campaign funds and involved mailings of reprinted newspaper articles, newsletters, meeting announcements, "alerts" and greeting cards in connection with Mr. Stein's official duties as Manhattan borough president. Counsel states that the issues addressed in the mailings were "relevant to the duties of the Office of the Borough President' and that "dissemination was Borough-wide and not limited to the 15th Congressional District (East Side-Manhattan).' This memorandum lists fourteen specific mailings and the categories of persons to whom they were sent. Attached to the memorandum are copies of the reprinted newspaper articles and other mailings cited. (Attachment 1). The contents of these mailings cover a wide range of subjects, from rent hikes and rising phone bills to landmark preservation and sex-based discrimination. All of the letters enclosed self-addressed, postage-paid cards by which recipients could indicate interest in the subject discussed in the letter. Certain of the letters are aimed at specific target groups such as Title I project residents, residents of rent- stabilized buildings, and residents of particular geographic areas, some inside and others outside the 15th Congressional District. None of the attached mailings mentions Mr. Stein's candidacy for federal office nor does any solicit contributions to that effort. Since Pre-MUR 123 was opened, counsel has also furnished a letter from Marguerite P. Manahon concerning the nature of the work prepared by O.S.I. and Election Computer Services, Inc., companies cited in the Town and Village articles as payees of some of the expenditures at issue. (Attachment 2-a). 2 U.S.C. S 431(9) (A)(i) defines "expenditure" as including "any purchase, payment, distribution, loan, advance, deposit, or 0 -6- gift of money or anything of value, made by any person for the purpose of influencing any election for Federal office." The Commission has consistently determined that for an expenditure to be deemed to have been made "for purposes of influencing" a federal election, the major purpose of the activity being financed must be the nomination or election of a candidate. See, e.g., AO 1978-15, AO 1978-56, and AO 1980-22. The absence of express advocacy of the nomination or election of a candidate, and of any solicitation of contributions on behalf of a candidate would also support a finding that the definition of expenditure at Section 431(9)(a)(i) does not apply in a particular situation. MUR 1458 involves a fact pattern analogous to that in Pre- MUR 123 and MUR 1699. Tn this earlier matter allegations were directed at expenditures in excess of $1,000 made by the state committee of a California State Assemblyman for travel and lodging at a time when the same individual was also a federal candidate. The investigation revealed that the expenditures involved appearances by the candidate primarily in his capacity as a State Assemblyman and that he had not campaigned for federal office on those occasions. Any benefit to his federal campaign was deemed "incidental" and thus unreportable pursuant to 11 C.F.R. S 106.3(b)(3). The Commission determined that the state committee had not violated the Act by failing to register and to report the above expenditures. See also AO 1980-89 and AO AO 1980-16.

In the present instance the expenditures made by Stein '81 for mailings do not appear to meet the Section 431(9)(A)(i) 4 7- definition of expenditures. They contain no express advocacy of, Mr, Stein's candidacy for federal office, nor do they solicit contributions. All involve issues and activities which can be deemed to have been undertaken primarily in connection with Mr. Stein's position as borough president. Even if some of the mailings were targeted only at individuals within the 15th Congressional District, they do not appear to constitute "expenditures" for purposes of the Act. Therefore, this Office recommends a finding of no reason to believe that Stein '81 has violated the Federal Election Campaign Act in this regard. Counsel for the Stein committees has also requested Commission consideration of payments made to D.H. Sawyer and Associates, Ltd. (*Sawyero). The Stein '81 reports furnished by the complainant in MUR 1699 show expenditures to this company of $60,000 in 1982 and of $50,000 in 1983-84. Counsel has stated that a dispute arose between Stein '81 and Sawyer following the 1981 election regarding the amount owed by the committee, and that after a July, 1983, fundraiser additional payments were made in resolution of the 1981-related dispute. Counsel contends that Sawyer *has performed no services for Stein or any committee connected with Mr. Stein since the 1981 Borough President election nor has D.H. Sawyer been retained in connection with any federal election nor is it expected that D.H. Sawyer will be retained in connection with any federal election." Counsel has also submitted a letter from David H. Sawyer dated April 10, 1984, stating that the firm "has performed no services for Andrew -8- Stein or any committee connected with Mr. Stein since 1981 Borough President election.* (Attachment 2-b). In light of this verification by the vendor of counsel's assertions as to the timing of services and the purposes of payments made, there appears to be no indication that the payments to D.H. Sawyer and Associates at any time have been for the purposes of influencing a federal election. Therefore, this Office also recommends a finding of no reason to believe that Stein '81 has violated the Federal Election Campaign Act in this regard. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. That Pre-MUR 123 be merged into MUR 1699. 2. That the Commission find no reason to believe that Stein '81 has violated the Federal Election Campaign Act. 3. That the attached letters be sent and the file in this matter closed.

GeneralCharles N. Steelemsel

Dt' Kenneth A. Gross Associate General unsel

Attachments 1. Copies of mailings 2. Letter from Thomas J. Schwarz with two enclosed letters. 3. Letter to complainant. 4. Letter to respondent. Mrch 20, 1983 vVANTED: IDEAS F)R NEW YORK CITY

An. accounting. t es,.m law, By A.drew J. Stoln health. As A merbes's om ic base bas Shfed from "'Clearty. the city and the region face -ama-- in toward servct, New York bas emg06 as th several yewrs of arther job loan, era& prower service provier for theworl.. mg = bases and increaums in dependent Irowcally, some of the very ra= popuauc=. But it is certainiy difficult to cited to explain the dtys eoomft "d& uceTW any actons the r tould take mms" am now rco as bedog to aver ,or mitigate this doi uward aUng i ituque S ftogh in a seskc ecoomy- larg, dwdy pcked a. That view of New York 9 atiam mad the um=ad Ci y, offered in 1975 in a manspm'.so& ad umW b. study prepazd tfr the Joint Sthat mppiM Ecwnomic Commime of Con- them. As Mabew P. Dru. gress.reflected a common nan. a prolmor of .0om. asu=won a.=orkg urban =t ics,, atpoinud New Yorkwn. %beUnivmy. enmM vw York was Manh ata's Borough Presid ~:it 1of zimvd. €oinpaes ctu.. seen to e congested. too old. too big and too cuber. says new approaches are needi ~Qto tered Inchb U . And some to accommodate the SpSd &3a f"Mtooambuss. demands ef modert con- nurture the city's g-owing sen rce n-s arl businbs aMm S, twes. both for commuzic. mer-ee. The future, they said, eonomy with its brokerag ,ion andfor marfOdnS r. would lie ir more sprawlitr urban seru.gs 1ie L= An- banks and commnication fmMS. poses. FUrimr ndCM of gese or Da.?-Fort Worth. tbe New York advanap: ,e.-e ,sso denyrg New He offer. is own sugrestion IMA.y of t edispersed Ycs prtie=s. That 'de. cities otten touted as the ~--~~ a~oo"is g0- urban ewirotmts Of. the .urure have beez ov:4 in 95.CD eicderly would consti- New York's d -ctionm- wit. tite the atiom,3S ventb-. ness the new bway Sys. , c.--. he num.ber of te =s b Ut by S= Fras o.L-r L-.g below the and Washzror, and the paverry 1Une. deftned i=the rapd-trai-s p~ans an.. lat cemss as $7,412 a year for a famoy rotmeed by Houst. of four. Ls greater than the entire p Yet New York's thunm is far from as UCo of DeI.MIL The public amnspo awed. We mnust ecovainethat the :y is, sytem .a faced rms aftier crl fis, &n fhuxamnailly, an G cMMMI€ Utiy ad the educaUonal and crminal-Just that the 53CM or faiure of mw tcmsare urder conSnant nack. notmc policies will deternmne toequaIIty Yet New York has conlmd6W Ii of "r Ives. That mum we mu ee ca ys . o Cassandras. LangteMMdebt savi specfic new prorams that nm-m af pel CLAg of Optsfertgexdl businms cmi=niY paard Wly Ut at the hb.ricallyow level of 10 p service tndtuswm Mm hch we tn- two hirds of thbemiofe et.. crMaInmdep . It abo.- yeagoIS. For belmIato~ quim thatwe bfnd wMYS f=Wcalyears. for eampie. the The de~ely packed pouatiotaand wom d. cram cty had a S lus. The ciys into the Job mauAt the its huge transit system, onc same me, we sedmto de. but merey sbitinggwm -. " viewed as among the causes such pbm asss as m m SlInce0 7. New York City New York's cooic woes, are Usndc Na ftee; of cridmi has ained more than 20,00 importance ta empboyws An new )obs, an avera of now seen as carpetitive aid. ,mpl oyr alke. nearly 4O.0 per yew. In in fohbhit doms. I bm. ram of Vwth, NewYok is attraca gfowth c p surpassed only b7. the Sin' ]Wft cities of Daias.Umo ..- t ., and Lmas gl~WhsI rawts m the fiel amsoflnd M tsiPL am of al. ?tbe Use, CualaUr&taU=aXfMd trawth is Lappelsain thin. eIUco We bmw ne a indus that rcprmw the taw way from tue deph of natm's ea€oc-ic tIture - 1V, bute a-* SM3to bave trw-nce. detiii nsu. toMb o"y.IMW3IU-.30S for the probiew CO.t!*eI= ec AT324r 1 de.

3'I01 Own 7IMSpa" Md.in..u.%- t .wr.#Io. A*,-. rt lift m MA 1 A .--..-:.a -yoO Ld.taP Underour Uniform Land the R9- .-.-- 2z,. e .= y=c. = low. l0yea t.x .--ate to be ated in the l:grt "of the cornpa.y's CIO.y agencies art allowed six =Mts recra aLs to , ''adng permanent Mwbrch to evawuate f lly the me s-m =.e -err.. e J a tn.st.rIal jobs. of any project by iea- of cc've Ls: 4 Island. -'esaCneter. bear b commucity boards. New ;e.s.y Lid Con.ecucut. They the City Pla g Cozmission and Ask almost anrone in business. .axe --rit4.fG.le bac -.cice the Board of Estimate. It is an ao- from the hot-dog vedror on the corner st.a" c *-,e .se'-ceecono..y.-pr.oess- proach that tas proved itself. But be- of the Avenue of the A."nencLs and •r.. money L C paper for fore a project is certified by the De. 54th Street to the head of the New L.ie c:.-cra..s locate in New York prtment of City Plarinza for the nim it C:.'.-e' wc.'k out there side by side York Stock Excb&ange: "'What's like view proure. it mum pan through - "..e e.-.iovees of hundred's of to start a busiess in New York?" He a bureaucraUc gantIet of challenges or she srna..:s:nesses zrC.1lar%*to the w'ill tell you that it is tough from var-ous agencies oan environ. tougher se.-';ce c -y.sc as food stores than in other cities - ir.large raenta, landmar, tax and owing or Cf:Ce-SJpp y shOpS. measure because New Yorkers have issues. Thisiwirew, oten chara.er- Mldtowt Ma,- artnrcontinues to an ingrained, negative attunde to- ized by pey wrangig takes an u:n. ward business development. a::rac: t,,e central offices of virtually conscionable average of 12 months e-e.-.pe. ,tponer : of the se.-vlce I hat attitrde is summed up in the per projec. Once aga we u=e at. pL-ase "'Gulry unt econor,.. ?ncc.. i ru cationis and proven ino. ford to trVw such roadblock in the cerit."and :-f.--11-.,C,.-.- enterprises to securities it has led to a daunting path of companies seekinL to setle array of regulaons %..s ..' ¢.s.-k liowever. though emboced in here or to -ea; the i tL palg bulding codes and lanxduse coporate headqu aters may polish review process should be performed withi a procedures. Che rnuLrJc: al i-age, they do not rep. labor codes and retail sinle agency, and the time aIlow per -its and fiancial resent Qhe p:"ncipal source of tuture reporting re- should be limited. by law, to six jobs - particularly the semiskilled quirements, admAinistered in an umno. Months. )obs the ciy's residents most need. ordinated and duplicaUve fashion by 0 And New York City as a whole is los. a boot of commissions. boards, coun- mg out to ou' suburba-n neighbors in cils. agencies an bureaus. New York leaf the mation inthe- Consider the demads New York t.e C .. peuton for these jobs. versity - and arbit Mao.ne- of lt placed upon the To a cer-ain extent. many of the compasies compet. tax structUM. It seems=aLm ie- business decasions to move back.of- ig for the franchises for cable televi. signd to discourage new businesses ice axid other enter:pnses out of New sion. a key technological element of from seling here. TM Ust Iwude York City ca c du.ing the mid-iNO's the service-dommnaeed eonomy. (To 1 propert tLxs, a I 1mz m and early lM,'s, L-spired by cheap put it simply, cable transforms every tax. a financial-corporatilntx, a gasolie. :nexpensive and abundant household telev-.sion set into a poteo- commercial o pancy tax plus a UaJ open space and vigorous "'poaching" marketplace for everyding from hont of mzor Usually uim p- campaigns by suburban commuii- stock transfers to re estate to the cific smaller taxes. New Yortcity ties. These decsiors established a latest in fashion.) Ever since Manhat- also has the nation's highet sales tax was "'wired" 1M, preceOen : It is hard to convimce a for cable in the (it pushes retail sales to he Suburbs) cry cc-pc,-r. .. - .a:set ;;p ;%:tsfirst cata. has beer trying to create a mech- and a substanti ,persoraJincm ta a.-,s= co=. poces~sc-na =*iLr. HIncksv-jfie. L. 1.. to alow caole ."aruj*e (it pusnes upper.iico e empioye to that its se"cond such plant shouid be its otherboroughs. What sbouid have thesuburbs). built in Long Island City instead of taken stx or seven months for corn. What's more, the ciys pecive bids and approval has takeua Hicksvile. upon business and sales taxes leaves But iand two .ears as the city has demanded as and co.'stn-c:ion costs more and more paperwork andL- us incredibly vulnerable Wthe fluctui t.sea-d the suburbs increase their auor of the national busL.es cycle. sisted upon additional programs of tax rates to cope with a.host of prob. Some other cities rely =ore heavily le-s dubmous value. The cost to the compa. subr-a.- cf:icia!s never on property taxes - in Boston, for ex- .- z :..e ,n;es has rs o ,.s- that it :s st:l un-. ago. New Yorx a.-pe, they accouit ,or 70 pe-. c: ce.-La-tn whether New Yorkers., other C:r" _'d otter uurnAn areas become revenues, exc~uding sate and Fe. than dhose in Manhatan., will get -nc-ez-:n-yv a::.actve. One recent eral aid; the f. .e for New York is 27 canie teevision.. ,erce.t. suggesLs a.: office-space construc. Lan -use reguaLion follows a simi- Not only do we =x our busures at toM in Bridog.vn lar pattern. For insunce. wny is a or Queens now costs a higher ate than vr-.aLy -a -eas I-,- n ;n Lhe s.D- s--a.! restaur'ateur pa.ming a side- any other walk care of rnargnal impact su- c:rv - the ave-ge ccn=pay pa.S ,ec'ed to the same exte.sive sc.-,ttny abou $7 ',X5in axet per yea: per em- To l-ure lise cornpa.es Uhat oc not ployee iven the most extensive housug - but we also piay favorites requri prme Manhattan office among the differen: development of the decade? Builders eusmes. Some s-pace, New York should re-evaluate taxes, like the ftin al-cr tbe zo=*w of large, expensive constriction o oraboo of various areas outside tax. aretargeted ccon f the city's c e..r. particularly projects can and do pay handsomely COM dy- under. narmic powPt dUstes. uli eid manuiacun g areas. The va. for the legal talent to shepherd a ca-nt and boared-up warehouses that proect through the morass of municl. Apparently. theb notion is wide. dot the Queens shoreline along the pal reviews, but a small entrepre- spread that these st.ng sem s•.t EasyRiver are a prime example of a neut. unable to afford such expertse. 'capcve" aid can be soaked for aL locauon is thwarted at virtuly every step. they are worth. In fact. some of tbese close to the midtown business "captives" ccore that could be devloped for back' One result: Many small lrms refuse have proved to be quite to locate in the city, or Ilngush when free. m-vg some of tbeir operatlos office activity. they do. , T,e ciry's velopment- tools out of the city and budding new back. office. also include the power of condemna, It s .t4 a result we can afford. service facilties eLwhere. In c ondanbe right tolease or sell va. About half of all our Jobs are with the long nu. the speciized busm taxes retard * cam city land and municipal facili- compatles with fewer than 100 em- the powth of ow .mg. ues. New York does not lack for such ployms..To help such Cmpanies cope etindstries and add to the Impres. land and facilities that would serve with dty codes. New York should con. sion ihin the business commimfty that the city better If developed for data- sider establishing a two-tiered sys. the city is botle to the private processi.g tem for some of its'regulatory ac. sector.That centers. L-or ,.on-sor- io .An example of wAt c-a-% be ac- imprassion is . age centers. commercial parks and bei*gbted by like. One example: the Brooklyn complihe is the Des-cnst of inuiti es witin th tax laws. A .m.-y Te.----nal, where the cit air- Builditnp" strealined permit and prime example is the o pac tax, U y st.-m its dilapidated buses be,- self-Inpeton pilbpam for small which Is ch r eds w n, whe teins ravtons. Multiple Ins1ectons are their commercial properte soother New York should -market such reurdfor Ilge proect by plumb. - businese. The Internatina Rmi propertes by utag a leaf from 'the er, electrician an the like. But hesg- Machnes Coprtion eM the American Tlelephone and Telepaph architect for an individual apartment Company, among other-s, boh on me.,-ial tax bude for corporate real- as empoered to vouch for th co .i Madiso Avenue, an boh ".besole oc- onof she renovations: hi lice.".se is cipnts of their aw bul.r. pay ti fofeit if he is fou---d to bve misstat ed such tax. However. the Fis 5s-,oc t. facts. .4 0 4 46J7 3 . ' 4?w York, says te author, shotuf nd ways i to make vacant or little-used municipal properties available for development as data. processing centers or commercial parks.

ters is just a block away from In addition, the Board of available to secondary-school must be nurtured. 1I.B.M.. leases out some space And there Education should begin to students during the uuversi- should be regular, routin in the building and thus must re redesign secondary-school ty's summer session. evaluation and redesign pay an occupancy tax. of academic and vocational. routes to meet demographic Such charges are inevitably training programs so that 0 and other changes in the city passed on to commercial ten- pupils do not waste their time When Harcourt Brace - a practice that has been ants in the form of higher learning obsolete and dead. Jovanovich, a major New more honored in the breach. 1 rents, discouraging new corn- end job skills. Metal-working, York publisher, announced a Criminal behavior in New parues from settling in the welding and nautical train- year ago that it was moving York is not so prevalent as city and old companies from ing, for example, should yield out of New York City, the some believe; we rank 12th expanding here. One solution to programs that give stu- company became the first among the nation's 25 largest to the problem would be a sin. dents the technical, mechani- corporate emigrant to cite cities in per-capita crime. gle tax to replace current cal skills needed by medical the diminished quality of city Yet the criminal-justice sys- comr,,er-:al and occupancy and dental aides, key-punch services as a key factor in the tem clearly must be im- taxes. The level of that tax operators and graphic art. decision. The publisher said proved if New York is to be would be set as ists. a percentage its employees could not rely perceived as a safe and se- of a property's rental income Some initiatives are need- on the subways and buses to cure place to live and work and could be negotiated on a ed. as well, in bringing city get them to work on time.All Among our most pressing long-term basis, granting youth and the business corn. the multitude of municipal reeds are more couru and owners a predictable tax rate munuty into closer contact. services contribute to the court officials, so that once and tenants a constant long. There is apprehension on both quality of life, but there ar criminals are caught they term rent. sides: Disadvantaged stu- two components most essen- will receive rapid punish. The reduction and reform dents have no experience in tial to mamtaung our eco- ment; today, it somemes of business-specific taxes dealing with the corporate nomic edge: public urArspor- takessix months to a year be- cannot, of course, be accom- world, and many business- tation and criminal justice. fore they are tried. Moreover. plished overnight. But it must men are reluctant to "take a New York's economy we need additional jag Mace; be begun, and an important chance" with the students. thrives on density, and that judges are now loath to hand first step would be a gfeater Work-study. apprenticeship means it must have a trans- down stiff sentences because reliance and post-high-school place- portation system that can them is simply no room for on the property tax the convicted. and other revenues that ment programs must be move masses of people effI- would be less harmful to busi. greatly expanded. ciently. It is the only Ameri. Perhaps the most popular. ness and less sensitive to The Summer Jobs for can city in which more people visible action, however. swings of the economic pen. Youth Program, established ride mass transit to work would be to put more police duhn. by the New York City Part. than-get there by car. But the on the street. The roadblock nership, a group of 120 lead- system is no longer ad- in the way of such a step has ing busness executives. equately performing its job. been finding the financing, There are some 3.4 million might well be duplicated by primarily because much of but two recent proposals obs in New York City, but the schools. Under the pro. its infrastructure - tracks, offer, in tandem, a solution. about 6.000 of them are per- gram. companies pledge to switches, elevated struc- One idea suggests that col- formed by men and women hire a fixed number of young. tures. tunnels - and its roll- lege scholarships be offered who do not live here. Some ex- sters for the summer. The ing stock are, literally, falling residents who would agree perts ciaim this pattern is students who take part learn apart, victim of a legacy of that for three years after inevitable, that our growing some new skills, but the chief deferred investment. graduation they would patrol * service industries will con- benefit is the socialization The M.T.A. plans to spend New York streets for a very tinue to look to the suburbs process - the changed per. $5.8 billion over the next five modest salary. They would be simply because our residents ceptions on the part of the years for capital improve. trained for duty during the lack the requisite education businessmen as well as the ments on the city's public summers. To aid 10,000 foot and skills to compete. In fact, students. transport. Of that total. 2.4 patrolmen would cost the city there is nothing inevitable More elaborate approaches billion is to be spent on new =00 million a year, or about about it. The education and should be encouraged. With subway cars and buses and. half the cost of a similar com- skills can be learned if the the financial support of Citi. to a lesser extent, on a limited plement of regular city pi-. city is willing to expend the bank, for example, the Board rehabilitation program. lice. The funding for such a money and energy to make it of Education has put together That is exactly the wrong program could be provided happen. a curriculum aimed at devel. tack to take. Rather than buy- by modifying another idea - New York does not lack oping skills useful in the ing new vehicles, the M.T.A. a .a-week payroll tax, split educational facilities, the banking industry. Similar should initiate a major pro. between employer and em- central job-training sites for programs should be devel. gram to overhaul and recon. ployee, that would be dedi- the labor force of the future. oped with other industries. struci its cars and busesmin its cated to a crime-trustfund. Our public school system edu- New York might also profit own yards. This would save The city would receive some cates about a million children by emulating a Boston initia- large sums that could be MW million annually, enough a year It is not. however, tive announced last year spent on the crucial task of re. to fund 10,000 foot patrolmen prepar-d for toe changing de- whereby the business com- building the system's cum- - with money left over for mands of the city's economy. munity pledged to employ a bling infrastructure. Given new court personnel and a mirrnum of 400 high-school the authority's plan to pur- One problem is financial. start on some new jails. graduates each year, on chase new cars from foreign The dark days of Now New York spends an average condition that the school sys- nations, a reconstruction pro- York's of ..,700 on each pupil, while fiscal crisis have tern reduce its drop-out rate gram would offer another suburban ' Westchester, Rock. lightened since 1977. The cir and improve its record iand and .Nassau counties in bonus, provid ng additional is no longer anational symbol providing students spend an average of £3.500. with read. jobs for its employees at of urban economic decline. ing and math skills. home. Yet The result: The small classes its resurgence has been a Though largely Yet the best-intentioned and intr-',ual attention state-fund. kind of unguided missile, so ed. the City University long-r-ge plans :...por-ant !or working with of are worth fueled by explosive grcvnh in New York still operates little unless disadVartaged city students the decline in business services and the under shared city-state direc- riders and revenues can be are eno,;ed,. instead, bv mid. financial industry but without tion and could play a much halted, au. die-class suburban children. In the past. the significant governmental di. larger role, working thority has paid all too little Even in times of recession. with the rection. As the other cities of city's elementary and sec. attention to finding ways he educational system is not of the nation move more force- ondary schools. College stu. attracting new riders. The re- the place to stint on the basic fully into the servkw-con. dents -could tutor public. cent proposal for a magnetic- omy reading and math skills re- era, New York wIU have school pupils, for example. eard system to replace tokens to quicken its pace. Now is quired for entry-level posts in the service economy. and remedial and enrichment is an example of the kind of the time to plan for that programs could be made imaginative approach that event. U Adrdiw iiW NewsletterW

DIVESTITURE.:. WHAT TO DO? On January 1, American Telephone & Telegraph will divest itself of its operating companies, including New York Telephone Company. AT&T will be responsible for long distance calls and customer premises equipment. New York Telephone will provide local calling service. The divestiture will radically change our telecommunication system.

The divestiture's effects on local telephone rates deeply concern me. I recently completed a study indicating the telephone company will need $2.9 billion over the next two years to pay this for process. Telephone officials predicted local rates could more than double in the next three to five years.

Telephone customers, however, have various options for cutting their telephone bills: Buy_ _yur 1) owneauipment - Most customers currently rent their equipment from New York Telephone Company. However, equipment, as well as future rental fees will revert to .TLT. Now, customers can own their equipment by purchasing it from AT&T or other telephone companies. You can thus avoid the monthly rental charges of $4 to $12 for standard equipment. You will recover your investment after several years. However, once you purchase the equipment, you are responsible for its maintenance and upkeep. Therefore, purchase high quality equipment, so costly repairs will not be frequently required. 2)Survey the Long Distance Market - As of January 1, long distance will no longer be provided by New York Telephone Company. Thereafter, consumers will be able to choose amongst a variety of providers of long distance service including AT&T, MCI, SPRINT and other carriers. Thus, for the first time, there will be a competitive market for your long distance dollar. The best advice is to shop around for the best long distance service that will give you the service you use or need at the best possible price.

3) Use local Teleohone Directories - Directory Assistance charges, for both local and long distance service, will increase as services are priced on a competitive basis. Therefore, consumers should seek to obtain telephone directories from the counties they most often call, so that operator assisted directory service can be avoided.

Telephone service will be changing significantly as of January 1. Consumers, however, have the capability to hold down their own rates by shopping around for the best possible service equipment. and Now that competition has entered into the telephone industry, we shold take advantage of all avenues of service.

ACCESS FEE POSTPONED The American Telephone and Telegraph Company had proposed to charge all of a its customers $2 monthly access fee- no matter how much money they spent on long distance calls. This charge could rise to $6 per month at a later date.

After months of discussion, however, the Federal Communications Commission has decided to put the new fee on hold for at least three months. Hopefully, we, along with other telephone intervenors, can convince the FCC to reject the proposal, and base all residential long distance ra:es on actual usage. This monthly charge is unnecessary and unfair to the telephone ratepayer.

HOW TO COMPLAIN ABOUT YOUR TELEPHONE BILL Many telephone customers wanqt to know where to complain about problems with their bill or service. The first step is to contact the telephone company. Your customer service representative will try to solve your problem.

However, if the telephone comparny doesn't satisfy you, call the New York State Public Service Commission- toll free. The PSC will investigate the problem. You are entitled to a formal hedn on any billing dispute and to appeal an adverse decision to the Commission itself.

The toll free.rnber for the PSC is (800) 342-3355. If you wish to contact the Commiin by mail, write to: : !

Public Service Commission Empire State Plaza . . :: ,, STEIN OPPOSES NY TELS $1.1 BILLION RATE INCREASE New York State Public Service Commissio On August 1, 1993, New York Telephone asked the of which would become effective next summa,b for a $1.1 billion rate increase. This increase, most the first post-divestiture increase. intervened in the proceedinp.t last four telephone rate cases, I have formally As in the Manhattan. Hearings began September 22. the interests of the people of the Borough of represent York Telephone Company's figures and gathering My utilities consultant has been questioning New increase is unjustifiable. witnesses to convince the PSC that this rate telephone company's increases within reason. For I have been successful in keeping some of the York to keep the pay telephone rate at 10 cents. New the past three years, we have led the battle defeated pay call to 25 cents, but we have successfully Telephone has tried to increase the cost of a this increase. municipal consumers which, fought the last Last year, we helped organize a coalition of that the PSC gave the telephone company onlywhalt telephone increase request. The final result was of what it wanted. by a New York State utility. The following are This year's increase request is the largest sought them: highlights of the increase and my position on a 30 cent pay telephone time, the New York Telephone Company is seeking PAY CALL - This an extra $196.9 million. I want to This would be the hivhert rate in the nation, yielding cfa. home telephone will still be able to 10 cent call so that those who cannot afford a keep the rate. communicate with the outside world at a reasonable free the residential telephone customer gets three DIRECTORY ASSISTANCE - Currently, request. calls, and is then charged 35 cents for each successive 7 nthlyDirectory Assistance free monthly calls Telephone wants to reduce the allowance to two In this rate case, New York I oppose any increase in the charge for any additional requests to 40 cents. and increase any telephone directory from the Assistance charges. Remember, you can obtain Directory local business office. phone company free of charge just by calling your Telephone wants $52.6 million more for connecting CONNECTION CHARGES - New York the actual proposed new connection charge totals $132, excluding teiephone service. The This increased to $18 by In 1970, consumers paid $8.75 to have service connected. installation. year). I oppose further increases; average and has increased rapidly since (it is $98.25 this 1975 cost of a service connection. middle class consumers can now barely afford the seeking a late the first time ever, the telephone company is LATE PAYMENT CHARGE - For wants to assess is more than one month late. The Company payment charge if payment next telephone bill is late charge on all unpaid bills at the time the customers a IYz percent amount owed less one which would be charged as a percentage of the prepared. This charge, and business customers. I oppose local service charge, would apply to both residential month's accounts come from major business customers this charge, as the largest share of delinquent rather than residential ratepayers. including increased wire charges, there are many other issues in this rate case, Of course, and higher private line costs. I will be for local message calling, higher exchange rates, increases I hope to stop the increase from taking effect fighting all these increases over the next six months. in its entirety.

WHO IS THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION? Commision and how it operates. The PSC people wonder who makes up the Public Service Many rates for electric, telephone, water, utility rates in our state. It is responsible for setting regulates Of course, it is also responsible for insuring safe and and gas companies'who do business in New York. adequate service. appointed by the Governor with the State Senate's approval. Thefor. The PSO has seven members, terms. There are no actual qualifications members serve for six years, with staggered two seats for consumer representatiVes. membership, but the last two Governors reserved rate awards have: b:een way the PSC has conducted its business. ItS I am unhappy with the to the interest. An ejected PSC, directly accountabhle excessive and contrary to the consumers' best people would serve us better. ANDREW STEIN, Manhaettan Borough president

A PROBLEM vrrH CITrY SERVICES? NEED HELP? HAVE OFFICE - 566- :3OO. CALL BOROUGH PR.ESIDE.NT AfIRE STEIN'S 397

4c1%~till 0 SUNDAY, APRIL 24o I3

THE PRICE OF THE AT&T, BREKUP Get Ready for Phone Bills to Double

By ANDREW J. STEIN

S Jan. 1. 164. the telcormmni- caiors indusutry as we tow it today will come to a wift end, when the American Telephone and Below are recent rate increases Telegraph Company divests itself of reoiested by th Now Yor as 22 local operating companies. Much has been written about the Tebeaftne Comocany olus thCcomDany' Srojeete*d revenue siortall rnynad opportunities for the Bell Sys. tor 1984 and 1985. tem once it is freed from the limta. Figures in millions.87 uons imposed on its overations and enters the age of free-wheeiag Sowfc* iNOwYork Stae eco~vtspe competition. Unfortunately. too little ,ttention on the national and local PUVIC Servoce commeaeiofI I level has been paid to the effect that dves3titure will have o the average residential and businss u.ers of local telephone services. And preliminary financial material from local operat. ig companies suggests that the breakup will be corsy, ti some cases tripling the average telephone bill. The ers sential chalenge for local reguators and rate-setting bodies is clear: scrutin2ize Lhe co s.quences of the divestzture on local users and de- siLn tuture rate s:xcures to rniiugate era]l years, doubling and in ome cases confidence In the new local operating the c-st to a- erage consurners. tn plmg.the cost of local telepbone anmpaniess an as yet unmeasured Following the afreoumetnent of the service to the cosumer. cost. But investent services are i- serVem-ent between A.T.& T. and the For example, according to test. ready casting a waxy eye. Last rmonth, Jusuce Departent there was no lack mony by Dwight Kellogg. AsListart Moody's downaV-ded the bond rtuing of dire predictions about tae effect on Controller for the New York Telo. of many of the operating comp~aes- local rates. Federal. state and local p.bone Ccmpany. the company says It mostly homMAAw Aa. As a resv. government agencies issued state. will need 2.9 billion in additiontl local rates will inse to meet the operat- mernt.s about the impeondng impAct of revenues by the end of IM. That tag companes' hI.her can of money divestiture. Te Uraited States Sen- aiount alore is greater ta all the arM investor wil become even more, ate's Commerce and Judiciary rate increees the moany has re- skeptcal of the ftna=a ability of panels, .he House Judiciary Commit- cerved In the last 13 year. Moreover, the companies after they are divested tee and the Subcommittee on Tele. from A.T.& T. communications Consumer Prttec- such a rate ireame wiU probably In. creamethe cost of the average con. Tbe cost of local telephooe service tion and Finance as well as vanom sumer's bi by 50 percest to 70 per- wUl be affected by a host of other state regulatory agencies ordered in- cent. Combined with a potenta L-- issues a well - depr=ation sched- qnes into the breakup. crease in deposits and nstallatiom. ules. the value of traufen-ed equap. Some of these heaas n have been ment, the asigm ent of book deprei- completed; others have yet to be Lriti. this rise n local rates cld price the telephne u of the market for tt= of atiom reserve, leasing arangements ated. But for all the talk. no legislatiot ard debt transfer. toclceoly a few. tas been enacted, nor new -ate struc. thowsnds or elderly and low-income New Yorkers. To insure that consumers ae ot tures desigied. And wth only eight overwhelmed by the potential ot of months remaining in the predivesl4- divestinture, state regatwrs ill have ure period, state regulatory action O T~ER sttee are in a similar to establish cearly their authority appears to be the consumer's onry line b Pe=sylvania rats Mw over these izsues and deliveate poll. of defense against ala.st certain double by the fifth yer of ies that balance the integity of the ica.-ng phone rates. diveswt;iu, ic ,MSIngDearly S0 settlement ad the Interests of the then the telephone umnilcal cord million a yemr. accord" Lo a spokes- low weephone customers. between Ma BAell and its local operat. man for the state's utltry co==m!* The local reAulatory agemies must Lng compa.,es is severed, most tele sion. A spokesman for Southwatern firs assert their coati l aver lfltra- commurucations experts apree that Bell said that In anticipation of dives- state access charg by seting rats tne opert-dtg comnmruc will reed to tirure the co Lpny expected to file for and fees at a premium for or4S-dL- rLae enormous anounts of revenue to a SI biL o rate r.se in late May, more tance operators. To asure their cm- offset the los of profit-muking serv- than do.uling Its rwjut of a *year rol, the ageocies must chamilenge any ices such as ing iUnes, customer ago. Ac-'-ig to a u ok na a for the F.C.C. actions that usurp thetr ability premises eqLipment " Dial-It. Florida ?ubic Service CommLuion. to st local rites. Most irdustry analysts e 6!atthe the avera residential fiat rate for Regulators hould a"o osie re- bulk of revenues will come from L- Soutl*n Bell u isesI 10., but as a qtrng epetor to phage-Li: aiy cost creased access chargm and irevamd remit of dvetture and the r~act of diveiture over five to 10 years to rates. Altbough A.T.&T. oft.cials F.C.C. declzc,r Lsing local uaers' ease the burden on the pubc. calmly amvure the public that .-egvi&- teft for kxig-distance service, the me w Finally, they should perut local op- tory autbonties will to able to se. ac- rate will beMI-1. erating companif to createnew ceP fees high ghto prtlocal Themeprdicti iea al't reflea the s ouretOfrev nue siuch as its own rates, state regulators are cmcaraed r,.msituatio or the full Lpact on the DIl.t services and Yellow Paes.By about o08-4 their own autbority in cnmers. For ostar.c, SNew Y n'k charzing prem tot, specal erv- this and oth.er area". primarily be Talepbre, in Its mt retca rate ia- !ca such as call forwrdi..ng, radio cause &the a1ngage of the etrement crew req . Is ee"1ng to main pagers a cellular mobile teiephore dmont prvvde for h-o state rea- a WS0 F-:r at rturn nc trty.Its SY they Couldalso help offtet the tors will set Ical rates or aci -4 wtr for the request, ac~dngr basic cot of the talepbone. I chargs. to its Bnef cE=OPUlcon to the Public ith dvwdtitue aroud the comer. In the abncs of dr :cnw3r or Ser-ice Cxmmtxtoi. is that -the in- the time to ac s ww. And bow tke / Specific atiou isttey rtulata to ,wtm conmmuity will be scruts. sn" eW-son.weethis chalNge I wil 4ete7=rine whether the teeh*xx axser their authrxity vver local rates. Otsizg this decislon toasertain wivcher tle comPany will be in sou repainsmoees of totnumle' / the Bell operas-4 c Pa n.t ,Will = avaldable to everowe hesitate to see-k rat -a.tt- tl4eci51CAm financial ~litnflas it approftrs / tom the F.C.C. -. tL a dI~tm " In esseno, .*r York / more sympatbetk sar. "rus,te pub TeW~Os is Already seeking higher rwym' fro iiacl-imers to pm Lie will have forfeitedvaluable Unal I ...... powers.-he ra.t c.rn.1ld ma saw Panrel"Affor diveSitut. Aridrsw J. Stain is' nomical wire~u ard* ~the ne= my- iinalthe. immatofinvestor 3a 4 6 7 7 1N3tIS3mNI31Sd HcflOaONVlIVHNVW M3IGNV. *: q46!!ui*3noL •G qnfop04 j" GuoLId snoA esno: uoi eJn4 4seAp euoldele±,,

t &O~£001 A'N "AM2W Imprtant newsAo €on¢-- cermr n,"-" - o ne Cpl Mistlt e directlyaffect you*

N14MIS&9*GNV

oOrlct-9% l a;w iv rr a d noA ol pre ;o aq ueo I;II'saqaeoidde aflI!1SQA!P spTndl~q J! put; noA ZdOU I " nUs,.-TSAp pu saP. auotdalai uo uor;?wjo;ui sa! a4 noA A op!AOJd s;f:;siu;!4j •aseD Q43, p;iclTuow F A r:s^p;Ul uc lua.'u.:A~oO~2ap-;A l!A S lu;)wuo p T!; ''D owJJn4 "- auoqd Ikd a:-,DU~ Ij 2U APS UT OnQn-M p scs- ,uoqd= m n i e )T-aiin TA m*h,T f.§O -r e", UT- P- !-A s.;a/ Aueuw .o; s~leJ pue ;~AJt,.a euoQdat o anlSSr aq u poioutAA! l~ ar uaq ~AeL4 I .-

• ~ Kip.,uatdrr.b pu'2 S~Tao!.s ;o a;OoqD ~A^L4 ItTM s. Wo~rnD .a;.a au'sjp UOr pue :uawdrnba sa.si.tujd .sn u!pi^ozd do2.s nq 'TADJaS auoqdal pao u~p!^oad anlu~uoD II euoqd IaJ. > JO.A MaN ' [Wli'X; JO " JeLP II1'.' S !AJOS UIT21J 0C s.ap!Ao4d 4 pue l.uio; -,;[..

42ofl "XOl.;T'osrl! U! S 2Ue4 aASu~t4;adwo pue p!d~a :swW aql o J~punl ua4 fiM! A~i&rpui sut nn~o~a qj ",S6T I A ienu uo inDDO [ !M ;Jrn1~.s~A!G] "aJflTls ,,,p 4dJ ylj -' uoiqdalal u'a!.'u~vW .d4. 'pur p~lq ' D;AJOS ;uoudaitl 7c s~uretdwoD ,(uew paAT.ZaJ ZaA 4 I

'luanI~suo ,. 10I-0% PRESIDENT OF THE BOROUGH OF MANHATTAN CITY OF NEW N~~~~. Y. I

January V7, 1194

Mr. William H Ransom 115 E 87 St. #14e New York, NY 10028

Dear Mr. Ransom, I amn writing to invite you to join me at a community meeting which will considet the question of whaether the Upper East Side Historic District should be extended from 79th Street up to 96th Street.

Date: Sunday, February 5th N. Place: The Dalton School 108 East 89th Street (Between Park and Lexington) Time: 1:00 O&M

'C You will have an op.portunity to present your views as well as listen to the comments of such people as kent Barwick, Chairman of the Municipal Art Society, Preservationist Brendan CGill, and Gene Norman, Chairm~an of the Landmarks Preservation Commission. Councilwoman Carolyn Maloney will join me in cosponsoring the event.

The issue of extending the Upper East Side Historic District is of enormous personal imnortance to me. My wife Lynn and I live i the area and both share a strong belief that the area from 79th to 96th has unique architectural characteristics that must be preserved. There has been a tremendous amount of development al1 over the East Side and it is important that the low density and the striking facades of many of the buildings preserved against further encroachment.0be If you are unable to make the com uity meeting but would sto ke to keep iformed of what we are doing on the issue of historic preservation and the extension of the Upper Last Side Historic District, please return the enclosed paid card to me.

ipease caell oaua 7ole at 566-6c37 if you are inarestec. in oang your views beard at our cort.nhity meeting on Fenbruary th. Sincerely,

A.ND)R7W S46 N 0

NC POSTAGE ADMISSION TICKit if" NECESSARY 9 9 0 0 oe~" '41eee W•i ;4 o 0 0 IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES COME TO OUR COMMUNITY BUSINESS REPLY MAIL MEETING TO DISCUSS THE PROPOSED First Class Permit NO. 8567, New York, N.Y. I EXTENSION OF THE UPPER EAST SIDE ' ' ' l I HISTORICAL DISTRICT Postage will be paid by addressee

Mr. Andrew Stein I DATE: Sunday, February 5th 1 Centre Street PLACE: The Dalton School New York, New York 10007 108 East 89th Street

TIME: 1:00 PM PRESIDENT OF THE BOROUGM 0r MAN,HATT'AN CITY Or NEW YORK NEW YORK N. Y. 10007

AAIOflW STuIN .OL.,o.0, March 9, 1984

Mr. Stephen Balderston 2025 Broadway, Apt. 12K New York, NY 10023 Dear Mr. Balderston, No one enjcys delivering bad. news. However, I think that it is important that you know that your rent may be significatly increased u-nless we do something to charge the current law.

As I am sure you know, your building is presently rent stabilized. As a result, your rent can only be raised by a fixed percentage each year. But if the current law is not changed, your building will no longer be rent stabilized 'fter July 1, 1988. This is because your building was constructed as part of thie " 2?1 a" r"-ra. This program, designed to enourage construction of residential buildin;s, granted own.ers a declining tax abate.ent for ten years but. made the new buildings subject to rent stabilizaticn for the sa.,ne ten year period. The ten years is just about up for the first buildings constructed under this rogram nd we can only anticiFate a sharp rise in rents.

Fort"nately, there is a remedy. Together we can work to anend the legisiation coverirn "'21 a" buildings.

Last year the state assemb.ly passed such arn a.enlment but the Republican controlled state senate rejected the proposal. com ccnvlnced that we can win the -ightthis yea. and I an working with the a Coaliton a=nd other MH .attan tenants to form a co=ittee to take our message dIrec tly to the Republican -a ority leader of the state senate, Warren.. nderson.

- ge you to re:urn the enclosed postage. pad card to me so tha.Mt can keeo cu info.r..ed - .anow the ?epu eics howoeaders any peo ple suppcrt "nfurcause. you wculd like -ore '-format:cn lease eca" 11:aethE Wright :v'..- :z -ctzC * :ncerely, 0

NO POSTAGE NECESSARY IF MAILED iNTHE JNiTED STATES BUSINESS REPLY MAIL First Class Permit No. 8587, New York. N.Y.

m m -I I Post&". will be paid by addresse Mr. Andrew Stein 1 Centre Steet

New York, New York 10007 PRESIDENT OF THE BOROUGH OF MANHATTAN

CITY OF NEW YORK NEW YORK. N.Y. 10007

ANONEW STIN

March 20, 1984

Ms. Theresa C Terenzetti 108 E 38 St Apt. 18B New York, NY 10016

Dear Ms. Terenzetti,

I am writing to invite you to attend a community meeting to discuss a proposal to the Landmarks Preservation Commission to designate the area from 34th to 39th Street between Madison and Third Avenue as the Murray Hill Hlistoric District.

Date: Wednesday, March Z8 Place: The Community Church Hall of Worship 40 East 35th Street (Between Madison and Park) Time: 7 p.m.

You will have the oppcrtunity to present your views as well as listen to the comments of Preservationist Bredan Gill and Gene Norman, Chairman of the Landmarks Preservation Commission. The Murray Hill Committee is co-sponsoring the event.

The designation of a historic distric: in Murray Hill is of enorrous importance. The area has unique architectural characteristics and a distinct atmosphere that should be preserved. It is important that the low density, residential character, and unique buildings be protected from further encroachment.

If you wish to express your views at our community meeting, please call Elizabeth Wright at 566-3Z46.

If you are unable to attend this meeting but would like to be informed of further developments regarding historic preservation and the proposed Murray Hill Historic District, please return the enclosed paid postcard.

1 hope you ca join us on . arch Z8.

ANDRE'" STEVN 0

~4., , A

NO POSTAGE NECESSARY ADMISSION-T CKET IF MAILED !N "THE COME TO OUR COMMUNITY BUSINESS REPLY MAIL MEETING TO DISCUSS THE PROPOSED First Class Permit No. 8587. New York. N.Y. MURRAY HILL HISTORICAL DISTRICT Postage wall be Paid by ad0ressee

Mr. Andrew Stein DATE: Wednesday, March 28th t 1 Centre Street PLACE: The Community Church Hall New York. New York 10007 of Worship 40 East 35th Street (between Madison and Park)

TIME: 7 P.M. Andrew Stein u). mflaorough President P,esOdomt of :b14 a t .2

Tmg CITY 0F Ngw Y*@XK )Ms. Janet Boorky a4hZZ," 84 S,? 75 West End Av Apt. 5B New York, NY 100Z5

Dear Ms. Boorky, We are writing to invite you to the second hearing we are holding on sex-baed discrimination in the market place.

Date: Sunday, April 1 Place: High School of Art and Design 1075 Second Avenue (Between 56th and 57th Street) Time: 11 a.m.

The hearing will focus on three aspects of the problem:

(1) Pay equity: equal pay for equal work and for work of comparable value, (Z) Discr.minatory hiring and promotional practices, and (3) Economic disincentives: e.g., inequities resulting from the absence of adequate child care azd unfair retirement and health benefits.

A number of experts will testify concer-ning the scope of these problems and possible solution-s. But we are most interested in hearing about your experiences. A number of people have already asked to speak at the hearing. As space is limited, we ask that you call Laura T6ole, 566-6Z37, at your earliest convenience to arrange a time to testify.

We recently held a hearing at City Hall on one aspect of sex-based discrimination - the absence of equal pay for work of comparable worth. A copy of the New York Times article on the hearing is enclosed. As you can see, we are taking steps to address the issue, but more must be done.

Of course, we welcore ycu to attend the hearing whether you choose to testify or not. If you cannot come but would like to remain on our mailing list, please return the enclosed self-addressed postage-paid card.

We look forward to seeig you on April 1.

Sincere 1y,

Andrew Stein Ca-rol Belamy . - #.am ^"re 1. re i -- President of the

?.S. C h-d z.re r v -e .viI a, t o c :or avene who needs it. ~gt 4io~x im0 S UNDA Y, FEBR UA RY 12, 198.4 balances in Pyfor Women Examined by City

I -

By SETH MYDANS 1sa leg&153-et-a:- &s-z.:a ! Iadt p-e cf * peaLirg .',r the c!-y, Perso0nnel Di- car-pxte-r? is a dea' aS JMP~:tan:* &.Sf-aCK-e!', parable" ,ecF-arda. -. 5 mdv=-t e iethtods use eiewnere Notif New Yor C.*v ,ay ' ar t hat :~~d il !r,~csD~ to Svuiy the issue in an ef-fort to deter- A zarwork-.\-w '-- mine the best way to-oceed. "'We WWf mng nto dtscrt-pen=,- _- .y te~we- n cortnue ovr a~~ssar4 bope~t~y C71 predomr.anrtl !emA&- mn_ %wp-rj,7i *come up -vith sc~e asuwers soo,' he 7-The ez; ;d-o !r~de--,Ca.-:* B3 am a..,,. Less to' X~ ed-jxrte TeAcbers President Andrew ,T Sein of 'v'an-a n.ot t-egin at 1L-ast to srJOcv t ,e Iss-e it IWir Ntwmaz, th-e lawyer who -won tan, mare t~e C:,'s ~t:s ?i C; ex- AeCa-e ajan Lat W anrxi State, said Nlonticn 0! S.Lla-V an mcnot..s ago to &n ~ =all aC:zCSS tZe czu.'y aiters get issue krmo- as e :or--a ea ~~ and zookeepers One vne&s saic *-a*.- get more tha---pl ewho ake cam of there v6-s L~n INew Y2ork C~ the tac-mal and male wcrke-s. Change Called 'Ineusle The vn6es ?amn _2:_1. a ~Ln-Yi ve- W~s m'ev-,ab'- -- :-e e-s mos: c! whom ar-e wcmen, is assStant Prof-ssor 'c- ~va Z14,%I.ci -'-,te acvmla avs-age s~~i~~z; s V!6.:.c . Miccs zoo- moc,ncs, Dowhz= .e rzen, L'2:in .egatee 2-e -*-- . -, - 9- a 06b Ca:tgC-v wethe stm.;. sal- clerical, C, e- jlobs. and n_ is', .ry .1 Most pan ~ 7 C7

ha t..pa.y.

:n;g lowe: 4-,aa for *o, re-ornm.l. dn ve r,.

v ~ '-zen zandwa

vers:-, ADMISSION TICKET NO POSTAGE 'I NECESSARY F MAILED COME TO OUR COMMUNITY 1N 7 MEETING TO DISCUSS SEX-BASED DISCRIMINATION iN THE MARKETPLA BUSINESS REPLY MAIL First Class Permit No. 8587, New York. N.Y. DATE: Sunday, April 1st Postage will be paid ty adcressee PLACE: High School of Art and Design Mr. Andrew Stein 1075 Second Avenue Ms. Carol Bellamy * (between 56th and 57th Street) 1 Centre Street New Ycrk", New York 10007 TIME: 11 A.M. PRESIDENT O" THE BOROUGH Or MANHATTAN

CITY or NEW YORK NEW YORK. N.Y. 10007

AN~PCW 6 ,?CIN

Ma-ch:j,1984

Ms. Theresa C Terenzetti 108 Z 38 St Apo. 18B New York, NY 10016

Dear ;4s. Terenzet:i, I am writing to invite you to attend a community meeting to discuss a proposal to the LamPdarks .?rese.,'vaticn Commission to desig'nate the area from 34th to 39th Street between Madison and Third Avenue as the Murrav Fill Historic District.

Date: Wedmesday, March Z8 Place: The Community Church -HaLl of Worship 40 Sast 35th Street (Between .Madison and Park' Time: 7 p.m.

You .-'. ave the opportunity to presen: ,yo,= vews as welf as listen to the co=mne ts cf .Peservao=ist: Brendan Gi1 and Gene No..aa, Cairman of the Landm arks ?r.ese.-a ion Comm-issin. The M-urray Hill Committee is co-sponscring the event.

The desigaaiom oC a h's.-ic dist-ic: i M-ray HI is of enor.ous i=portamce. ,he area has unique &r-hitectural charac'e.n.stics and a dis:inct atios-here that should be preserveci. I: is -.portar.: tha" the low density, residential characte:, and unicue buildiwgs be :ro:ected c= further encroachment.

I you wi-sh to e.x.ress you.- views at ou: co-mmunity mee ting, please call "Elizabeth Wright a- 566-3246.

if you are , a-le to attend tis =eeiz4- but would like to be informed of further develcpm ezts rega~rimg historic -reservani r and the :roposed Murzay "Hill IHistoric Distic:, please thete- enclosed : aid postcard.

Ibcope you ca= joio- us on .arch 2.

S .-ev, PRESIDENT OP THE BOROUGH Or MANHATrAN CITY Or NEW YORK

NEW YORK N. Y. 10007

ANO€)IEW 5rCIN 00"6'"T March 9, 190i4

Mr. Stephen Balderston 2025 Broadway, Apt. 12K NtewYork, NY 10023' Dea. Mr. Balderston, No one enjoys de iverins bad news. However, I think that.6 it is izportL'nt that you Inow that your rent may be si;nificantly increased unless we do something to change the current law.

ks I am sure you Imow, yo.r building is presen*ly rent stabilized. As a Crresult, your rent can only be raised by a fixed ;ercentage each year. o B,.,t -ithe c-ren4 law is not c.ha~ned, your bui.ding will nc Icnger be rent stab:ilize after July 1, 1988. T.his is because your Wi'. -n was ccnstructed as part of the ""21 a" program. This ;rogra.., designed to encolrage const-ructlon of residential buildings, granted owners a deal r.Lng tax abatemeno.or ten years but rade the new t,,-lt. s sub jec: to rent stabilizaticn for the sane ten year perlod.

The ten years is just about u, fcr the f 'rSt bui2l.dirs costructed =-nder this :rcgran a..d we can cni. antici-ate a shar .- se in re.nts

Frtun-ately, there is a remedy. Together we can work to a=end the Clegislation coveri-g "421 a" b"1i'-s.

N" Last year the state assmbly passed such a. =,aendent but the -Republican c.ntrolled stte senate re,:ected the -ro:osal.

z. convinced that we can "i te fiht. to the I2 a Coaiicn and other Man:hattan tenants to fo=- a corittee to cur nessaze direey -tothe .Re-ubioan -aor ty leader op the state senate, Warren "_-erson.

-ze you to ret"r. te enc o:sed postage ;a"d card to me sc that 7 can

cs ...wc. e...easecal - lizabeth W4 Cnerey,

ak*-.. ?S E. NO POSTAGE ADMISSION TICKET NECESSARY IF MA.ED

17'E S , rS COME TO OUR COMMUNITY BUSINESS REPLY MAIL MEETING TO DISCUSS THE PROPOSED First Class Permit No. 8567. New York. N.Y. MURRAY HILL HISTORICAL DISTRICT Pos:age will be paic by aCtressee

¢* Mr. Andrew Stein DATE: Wednesday, March 28th

1 Centre street -Ia- PLACE: The Community Church Ha) -U- of Worship 10007 New York, New York 40 East 2,5.,th Street U- (between Madison and Park)

; TIME 7 P.M. 'q {0.,i •.-. .

/

1,1 4"

NO POSTAGE NECESSARY .IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES BUSINESS REPLY MAIL First Class Pfrnit No. M87. New Yor*, N.Y. m m Postage will be paiC by adoress

Mr. Andrew Stein

1 Centre Street

New York, New York 10007 THE Crry or New YORK March 22, 1984 Ms. Janet Boorky 755 West End Av Apt. 5B New York, NY 10025 Dear Ms. Boorky, We are writing to invite you to theb second hearing we are holdixg on se-'b"d discrimination in the market place. Date: Sunday, April 1 Place: High School of Art and Design 1075 Second Avenue (Between 56th and 57th Street) Time: 11 a.m.

The hearing will focus on three aspects of the problem:

(1) Pay equity: equal pay for equal work and for work of comparable value, (Z) Discriminatory h;ri g and promotional practices, and (3) Economic disincentives: e.g., inequities resulting from the absence of adequate child care and unfair retirement and health benefits.

A number of experts will testify concerning the scope of these problems and possible solution.s But we are most interested in hearing about your experiences. Anumber of people hav~e already asked to speak at the hearing. As space is limited, we ask tha you call Laura'T6ole, 566-6Z37, at your earliest convenience to arrange a tine to testify.

We recently held a hearing at City Hall on one aspect of sex-based discrimination - the absence of equal pay for work of comparable worth. A copy of the New York Times article on the hearing is enclosed. As you can see, we are taking steps to address the issue, but more must be dome.

Of course, we welcome you to attend the hearing whether you choose to testify or not. f you cannot. come but would like to remain on our mailing list, please retLurn. the enclosed selff-addresssed postage-paid car&.

We look forward to seeing you on April 1.

Sincerely,

Andrew S:te_ Carol Bellamy .C::z ~carec be?- .icie t ?esident of the City Co cil

?%.Ch~cre v.-b -- a: H'i SiZ$c c I~J. r 1.'am,",ryone who needs it. 9 # .

PRESIDENT OF THE BOROUGH or MANHATT'AN-

CITY OF' NEW YORK NEW YORK. N.Y. 10007

AhiooEw eac . April Z3, 1984

Ms. Alta Nadelberg 180 West End Ave. Apt. 5L New York, NY 10023

Dear Ms. Nadelberg,

As ! am sure you know' thhe building -ou live in is known as a Title I project. While Title i has been the subiect of recent iiigation, your b'Jilding is not directiy invuived. Nonetheless. because ma=y of you have asked me about recent developments invoimg cc-op conversions of Title I projects,"I would *liketo share with you a re-iew of my actridties in this area.

On Thursday, September 15, 1983, I sponsored a resoluticn at the Board of Estim-ate putting it cm record as solidly supporting the view that amy ccnversicz of a .Ttle I project to a cooperative or condcmizium must be approved by the Bi:&-d (resolu:io-.ezciosed). I was very pleased when the Board of Estiante u -ouslv su..:-ted my resclution.

When legal ch/-Penges fcllowed :his action, i encou-aged the Corporation Counsel of New "crk City and the A:'c.-ev -eera of New York State to support our posi:icn i= :he courts. in the inii:iai case. u=fcrunat.ely, the courts r-Led a.ainst the city'?s posi-ior_. 7=L- decision is now being appealed.

As the appeal is be--g heard. 1 want you to kow that I wiEl conti=ue to be guided in my ac:ions by am o -. inal ccncer-., which prc--pted me to offer my Board of Esti-ate resolution. 7hat ccnce.- is a simple one: tha. the rights of tenats = alL Title 1 projects be f-y .rotected. -ur:hermore, while the cu-.e- focus deals with :hree ,a'-hattan projects, what is deter-.nec i= these cases wil se: a precedent for all Title I conversio

Cr hese reas:-s . " -1_ conti-ue to work for and call fcr the rec.nuirement of Board of -s.:'ate a::prcval of anv ccnversic-s in Title 1 projects.

as'iv. " wculd m h apIrecI:e any th cu-gh:: yc have cn "hts subject. -oueea re:.- oe enclosed card.

c e,: ey UDAT E ON THE NEW UPDTEEMERGEvNCY TENANT PROTECTION ACT

During the 1933 session, the State Legislature revised the Emergency Tenant Protection Ac. (ETPA). Some changes are pro-tenant; others are pro-landlord. The major changes are described below. If you have any questions or any problems with your landlord, call the Borough President's Housing Office at 566-4105.

STATE OPERATION OF RENT CONTROL AND RENT STABILIZATION On April i, 1984, the Sta:e Division of Housing anc Commur.ity Renewal (DHCR) will begirn administering rent stabilization and ret control. By ui)' 1, 1984, landlords must register each aoar:mnent's rent witz-h DHCR. This will establish the initial regis:erec rent. A copy of each aoar:ment's registration must be sent to its tenant. A tenant has 90 days :c challenge the iniial reg.istered rent's legality.

Landlords found guiltv of wilIf,.ly overcharging after April 1, 1984 wil! be liable for damages e-ualiing three times the amoun: of the overcharge.

-DwIll a.so esfore the laws agaInst tenanthara smen:. La ndlcrts fcund guilty cf harassm-en: can now be fined up to $[,CC for the first offense and up to $2,5CO for suo.sequent cffenses.

APARTMENT SHARNIG 0 In May, 1983 "he State Court of AcoeaLs ruled :*hat andlords ma., evict unrelated -enants sharinc an aparment withou: the lamdlor-ts c nsent. The Legislature subsecuen:.!y revisec the law to ermt one a ='zona. 0cuoan: (a eson -t on the !ease nor rela:ed :o :he enant) and -,he aoccuant*5a, co,, oc~pn: deeddeencenzr ncdren.c'ii:r-n

SUBLETTING AND ASSIGNING The revised T?, ex iic:y g.ves :enar;.s the r:z.: to suble: their aoartments and prohibits landlords fom "unreasonably '':c.hocing consent." Tf a landlord unreascnably wit.hholts consent or does no: rescnd to 6ne sublet request, the tenant may proceed wi;h tr . . Howe,'er, a tenant's lease may . be assigned withoutn, 0 .... or' s consent, e -ven if "haz consent is unreasonabi', witnnelz. Defining "T',o reason to '"c.o., consent" has 'been lef- to :-.e cour.s.

TENAINTS C F NON-PRCFiT INSTITUTCNS PROTECTED en--n-.s i,, '.e non-: [ns:.:ut;ons are=v now covered by rent n. st.u..uaiian.iords art no'.,.",:e.o fm evtWnZ :0 use ,neir asar--.n-- . _o: .al ses5r if CI :he e as ccu' ec :ne ....mses :r -ive yve-rs anc -,c nc: bMec :- te" e ns:itu:icn's r!gn t- Z',R.AC P-e .. e ,D-: , , cr'.s.:.r't r,':w;

e-rte S-.e1-1e r i ' e . ' - ' " C --:_:-v .:" C" :' " "----- : = -:.... D':-=-121 L :: , : 9 : 77e.e: .,: ': ,. - . .- ..- "c '-. .; ...... e '. = a ' '7".7

S.."effecive october 1, 1983 to September 30 1934. The guidelines are the same as . last year; 4 percent fori a I year eej ai ipercent for a.two year lease. For ,t tenants whose electricity is included in the rent (Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village) the guidelines are 3 percent for a 1 year lease and 6 percent for year lease. Due to a law passed by the state legislature the three year leasea 2 provision has been eliminated.

Units renting for $200 or less, in addition to the mandated increases, wil have a $10 monthly additional allowance. Rents in these units are not to exceed $203 and $214 for a I or 2 year lease respectively. The RGB has also approved a three-tiered vacancy allowance ranging from no increase to 15 percent depending upon when the last vacancy occured.

I am encouraged by the Board's decision on the basic guideline of 4 and 7 percent because the cost of operating a rent stabilized building increased only slightly above last year. But re-imposing a vacancy allowance is unjustified and gives landlords an incentive to harass existing tenants to move. SENIOR CITIZEN RENT INCREASE EXEMPTION (SCRIE) The state legislature recently passed legislation which would allow the City Council to authorize cash payment to landlords whose Senior Citizen Rent Increase Exemption credits were greater than their property taxes. SCRIE allows senior citizens, 62 or older who have annual incomes of under $10,000 and pay at least one-third of their incomes for rent, to apply for exemption from further rent increases. The landlord gets a property tax credit for the amount of the exemption.

The New York State Supreme Court ruled the program to be unconstitutional because in some cases rent increase exemption amounts were greater than the property taxes, thus depriving the owner of rightful income. The City Council now has to act for the program to comply with the court order. You can help by writing your council representative and urging them to support SCRIE.

BRINGING THE LANDLORDS TO TRIAL In October 1980 1 filed a class action lawsuit, along with the New York State Tenant and Neighborhood Coalition, charging the New York City Rent Guidelines Board with violating the spirit and the intent oi the Rent Stabilization laws. The suit contends that, when it sets annual rent increases, the Board doesn't fully analyze all the economic factors that de:ermrne the profitability of housing. Instead it analyzes just the annual increases in prices for goods and services, only one factor in the housing market. The case is now," moving tow'ard trial and i am confident about its success. A fundr, s ing e ffort to supcr : e con.nuing 1ea a-:tle is now underway.

IF YOU HAVE A HOUSING PRCCL-EkA ,LL BOROUGH PRESIDENT STEIN'S HOUSING UNIT FOR ASSISTANCZ -- over- NEW YORK, SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 1964 Preservation Laws Should Apply Equally By Andrew Stein and Lynn Forester Stein

The New York State Legislature is be involved in the protection o its ar- giou., organizations is enurely unwar- seriously considering a measure that chitectural treast-e. rated. would strike a body blow at the ability Our courts have repeatedly held The First Amendment does not give of the state and city to preserve irrme- that land-use regulatim including religious ormiations a ri to en- placeable archifectural andmyarks. landmark preservation, are a legiti- The proposed mate gage in axnMercia acivity Without legislatio which has use of governmental powers. abiding by the same regulstions acquired prominence because The public's interest that of the in protecting ir- govern others. Moreover, dispute over St. Bartholomew's replaceable art and architecture rteligious de- organizations are subject to an as- Church in New York City, is designed mands public scrutiny of decisions to sorwmet to prohibit.be application of laws including zoingand of any local change or destroy such resources. health and safety regulations. landmark preser-ation regulation to Landmarks laws It is permit such pub. tmacceptable to suggest that com- property owned by religious orgam- lic involvement and, at the same zatiors without mercial activity is transformed into their cmsent. Its sup time, are responsive to the needs and religous porters cotend that the landmark Interests expression because the pro.. of the property owners. In ceeds from preservation laws, applied to build- particular, a commercial real estate the current lnmarks development will be used L,,gused for religious purposes, vio. laws provide for to advance relief in casf of the actities of a relgios organiza- %rl late the prohibition against stace hardship. in- •umL All owners of commercial real terfererce with the tree exercise of The debate surrounding the pro- religion guaranteed estate should play by the same rules. by the First posed legislation has revealed the As Amendment of the Constitution. the United States Supreme Court very senous and legitimate problems said in 19: However, the public's interest in "'When followers of a facing reigious organizations. How- particular sect enter into commercial Cthe use and disposrtion of valuable ever, New York City's "hardship" landmarks requires actity as a matter of choice, the a mechanism to provision is designed to address this limits insure that invaluable archtecture they accept on their own con- is issue. For example, the New York duct as a matter of conscience not indischn.iately sacrificed for and City Landmarks Commission found faOh are not to be superimposed on commercial gain. Landmark laws hardnp with respect to property provide just such a mechanism. the statutory schemes which ae owned by a chur in the Fort Greene binding on others in that activity." Two immutable principles should Historic District and, on an expedited govern the debate over any legisla- Landmark preservation and reli- basis, authorized the demolition of gious expression are allies, not ene- tion that would Limit and ark the church-owned preservation building. The com.- mies. The protection of both is a vi- regulations. First, land- mission's recent decisions with re- marks preservation tally important goal. We can, wth should contnue spect to the Mount Neboh Synagogue sympathy, umderstanding to be recgzed as a proper arid and econ- and the Marymount School reveal omy, administer our landmark highly desirable function of govern- that a workable procedure is in place ment. Second, the tratment preservation laws. But our land- of comn- and the opportuniry for relief exists. marks are too precious to permit mermal development should not dif- In both cases. the commission al- fer because of the identity of their destmruc without public scru- the lowed the irstutions involved to al- tiny. The beauty owner or the purpose to which the of our landmarks ter their sti-uctures so they could re- w-s lovingly and carefully created; it profits fl,-'m the commercial acnNvry mair eccnonrcally viable. wi!: be put. must be lovingly and carefully pr- Of couse, we can and should mn- served. Pubic pobcy and legal precedent prove our laws and their administra- supot t:e use of gover-ment ro-gu- tion where r.ecessary. Fair and equi- Andrew Ls latiors to protect landmarks. The table adm.xmt:s-ation of them is not Stein Manhattan Borough blanket exenption that wotld be imnposibie. But president. Lyzn Forester Stein. a a flat prohibition 1cwyver. is a rrer- he. &-anted religpous organizaton by against public participation berof .Municipa in deci- Arts Society, the prcoposec gemcsiation is a direct s;ors a..ec= the preserva:ion or de- a cnivic organizrionde- chailenze to Le "-ght of the public :o strucion off buildings owned by relI- voted to lanamar*preservation.

m ~ ill 4"m r r I ,Var7hc,.z'LAra-Nn Borough President

NOT AT GOVERNMENT EXPENSE. rK QMU c$ :05bC41V DAY, APRIL 24, 1983 Business Forum THE PRICE OF THE A.T.&T. BREAKUP Get Ready for Phone Bills to Double Service Commiason. is that "Ve in- By ANDREW J. STEIN vatment community wil be scnMi- ating, tis decio to metma Jn.1S4. the telomit. 590 whether the company will be In ewA flC ato rL industry as we I it financw conditoo as It approschm a today will 'me to a swft e W. divusiture." In esseum, New York when the Amnencan Telephome and Telephone is already seeking higher Teiegraph Company divests itself of revenues from its customers to pro. its= local operating ompanies. pare itself for divestitue. Much has been wrtten about the Additioially, the rmpom of invwtor myriad opportuitle for the Bell Sys- cmfidence in the new local opeating tem once it is freed from the 1lmits. onepem is an as yet unmesured tionsImposed on Its operatio nd cox, But izvment seriaes are al enters the age of free-wheelin ready castig a wary eye. Last month, competiton. Unfortunately. too little Moody's downgaded the bond rating qnrention on the national and local of many of the oWea ting wmpenm- level has been paid to the effect that mostly from Ma to A&a&. As a rmult. 1164esnuru- will have on the aveage local rat will rise to con the operat- reidential and busin um r of local lag wmpamn igher ost Of Wone epireservice. And ;rel±i~inary and ir r wil become even mom =.nancili material from local operat- 985 skeptical of the finanal stability of Lug nomres sugests L-a: the the companies after they an divated Ibte il be cory, in some case from A..&T. tripling the average teifphone bill. Mhcoist of local1 telepboie servic ,.hte essentual challenge for local SM=K .wz will be aLffeced by a bost of oth. .eguators and ratc-setting bodie is Lsues as well - depreciation aced ,dear- sct ae the consequences of offset the loss of proflt.making serv- ceivec inme las 13 years Moreover, Ws, the value of trasferred equip- - divesiture on local users Lad de- ice such as long line, customer such a rate uic'ease will probably in- mwt, the asopment of book depreca- sign future rate s'actures to mUgate premuses euuipmwt and DIl-It. creas the ct of the atitrage con Atc rverve leasing arrangements . ca,n to average consumers. Mot indutry analyssaote that the sumer's bill by 50 Per t to 70 per. and debt tzan ser, to citeonlya few. Foilowing the anrxicement of the bulk of revenm will come trom in- €e:c. Combt.,ied with a ltenual In- To inswe that orwumes are not Se et between A.T.& T. and the creased acces charge end Increased crease in deposits andu imilaticos, over welmed by the potential amof ce Department there was no lact rates. Altbough A.T.& T. officials this rise in local rates c d price the divestrue, state regulators will have of dire predictions about the effect an cal mly amure the public that regla- telephoe out of the maxke.t for um of to establish clerly their authority -!Val rates. Federal. state and local tory authontes will be able to set ac- tho ds or elderly and low.Uiote over these Lis and delineate pol gove.-ment agencie issued state. cess fee high eno to protect local New Yorkes. cme that balance the integrity of the ent about the itipeiding impact of rate, state regulators ar conce ed settlement and the interests of the Iv~stlra e. e Unted States Sw- about bonig ther own authortty in ^THER ate Il lowcal l futma must ate's Commerce and Juw cary thL and other areaa, prinmarily be. ar a similar 'iels. the House Judiciary Commit- to.Peinnylvania cause the language of the setlemnt double t a o ft assert their cntrol over intra- tee and the Subcom=mttee on Tele- does not proide for bow state regula. by the fitib 810of state access carge by sett=g rates sonm uncatioris Consumer Protec- tors will set local rte or a m divetiture, Incrasing iy lly0 mandfew at a premium for long-dis. mil.1ion a year. a crding to a spokes um and Fisace as well as vsious charges. ty comJ=--- opeators. To assure ther cor- state regulatory agencies ordered in- %An for the state's utill t coinmis crol. the aenciesn_. r ust chall ge any quie into the breakup. In the absence of clear a2ners or sior. A spoikesmnan forS aofdies. F.C.C. actiow that ".rptheir abillry Some of thee hearings have been specific actiow by state reglators to Bell said that in anticipau co epited;oters have yet to be initi- assert their authority over local rate. tri-e the ccmpany expect adto file for Reulator sbould also consider re- iepslation the Sell operating companes wtll no a S1btli on -ate ris in Iate ated But for all the tail. no operators to phase-t any cat has been en'iac:ed. nor new rate struc- bmtate to seek rate-setag decisions than doubling its reuer of a year quirng from ma or te of divesrre over five to 10 yeas to -.-es des:pred. And with only eigt the F.C.C. - undoubtedly a ago. According to a spokes more sympalhetic ear. Thu, the pub. ease the ..- en on the public. =or.nhs remai-ung in the predivesti- Florda Public ServiceC lat raw fo Finally, Lbey should permit tic will have forfeited valuable local the average residetial aae local op. ture . nod. state regulatory action f f rating cnpes to create new apea.rs to be the cor.suner's only ILne powers. The result could mean astro- BellBou~he:'t uses Ls S10. 65. but as a surces of revenue suc.' as its own of oefense agamst almost cerain nomical increases withi= the next sev. res'ultof dvestinure L:d tbe recent era! years, doubling and Lisome caaes F.C.C. dec:iano rpsing o,,e rs .al-Itservces and Yeow Pages. By soaru-4 phone rates. I -.e, Le ew oarg-ng premiums for special serv. ten.he teiephone unbilical cord trping the cos of local telephone fees for ong-distnce serv service to the consumer. rate w-41 be $31. ices such as call forwa.ding, radio bem.een Va Bel.ind as local opera - pagers and cellular mobile telephone ing com "aesis s.evered.-,ost *eie- For example, accordig to testi- Th'ese 11eicton dc't ref] a the syte tey =uid also belp offset the cocmmucatarz e.~xrts agree L.at mony by Dwight Kellogg. Assis t --Le v.au&uon (r- the 'ull L=iPact cc the beslc C=of the telepoe :' e. aturgo t.r:nit- will need to Cont oller for the New York Tele- -onsL- es.- lor itance. New York With divnstture around the corner. ..e~oz*0. rno~nts of rrvemue t, phone Company, the cpay Says it TeiePC e, its moSI, e =nt rate t'n the time tz a: u ne w. And how the wll need =.9 billion in addiumal c.e. -" -:is seek ng to mrsmt=h state reg-laL a :5.fgt pe--: .rn-,.'-n or, or meet -has chaliense revenu- by the end of 19. T'hat eqxr. ' s w~li deter=nine wlether L-e telephone 5'e'1 ;: the Boo&gi amoun't alone is gr-eater tha= all the ia:c xi~q~or the resiwacwxntig re-maxii =e-a of cocr-municaton .ate nc -.qs te. -ne.iy has ,c,t Sei'5 7 cr !Zxcepuamr to the Public available to eyervri'i 0

AN-DR~ T _;)rough President vir~ <~1

Q.Ae ~e~ti ~4ork ~ime0 MONDAY, MAY 3,. .39I $-

Letters Ill-Chosen Approach to Rising Health Costs

moy an mdlvidual pays before an For example, if a hospital builds a To the Editor: CAT The Reagan Administration's letis- isurer begins to foot part of the bill new wing or purchases a new lative package for controlWlg health- With higher deductibles, many people scanner, it will still be obligd to pay will defer vtis to a doctor wril their tb. debt service oanthe Investment. care ots, cited in a May 12 Op-Ed ar- &e tide by Dr. Roberr. -Un, Assista With reduced comer demtand, Secretary in the Departent of hospital will simply divde tt Cos Health and Human Services, has two amog a smaller patimt pool. Siml. flaws: it's unfair and it won't work. larly, ptyscians will raise their f It's unfair because, like so many to maintain the income to w they other Reagan initiatives, it places a are accustomed. ,."vy burden on our pr.our elderly Dr. Rubta's assert on that our medi. and our working people by litng ac- cal cam is the "'world's best" is n=t ,.ess to services thev,need thrmuh tbe quite orrect. It's only the world's simple expedient of reducing their most expensive. ability to pay. We rank 18th In in ant mrtality, It wo't work because It is based on 15th in longevity. Tes of millions f the erraos notion that health care. ow ctzem go wthout neded treat- !'.keshow or potatoes, fals in price as ment simply becamuse they Pamot at- demand falls. ford it. Yet ou naton is first in the Dr. Rubin asserts that two bills now world in the perceptage of gros na- ,nCongress would create inceamv tonal product devoted to health care. among comnumers for cheaper, "more Something is inzflatg our health. efficient" health care. Just bow the care cots, and it is na the aerage bills wold do this he doe='t say. the Governmeat provides tor o poor in reality, the proposal to tax and elderly. Dr. Rubin was quick to health benefits would only forc medical problems becme over- dismiss the role of the provider in the workers to negotiate for fewer and wbelaing. In cases in which early de- escalating cs of health care, but the fewer benefits to keep the Govern- tection is crucial, this could be a fatal evidence suggests that it is this group ct. ment from tfn bigger and bigge, decisio In dollars and cPs. higher wt plays the crucial par. bites out of their real income. That's deductibles are a mistake because de- What we have to do is start chip. not cost conta neeL layed diansis otten leads to the need ping away at whaz makes health care And it is bard to imagine bow higher for acute care, ilatmg the cost of in this country so expensive, not Medicare co.pymetu will provide an medical treatmea. merely cut the money the Govern- aded incmtive for an elderly perso The problem with the schemes is mert is wiJling to spend for tts-citi- not to slip an ice or fall in the bathtub. that they are based m the faulty zens. We have to attack the rot of the But be or she will pay five times as theory that consumer demand can probiem. bbspita charges and physi- much for that six-week hospital stay dictate the price of health care. They cian's fees. At the same time, we for a brok, hip: $25= instead o $304. do not address the real problem, must persevere In our efforts to ex- which is the profligate habits of our pand coverage so that all of our cid- Tnis is exactly the knd of devastatng zens have adequate and affordable was de- health-care proNiders. If these bils bospital cost that Medicare heaith care. ANDREW SrED7 slied to prevent. are enacted, they wil i=ease the per-patient cost of health care, not Manhatan Borough President Equally serious. both schemes New York, May 13,1963 would d rve up deductibles - -he ,'.-&ce it.

Ai~i D~W Z 1 12 Manhattan Borough President Ne's GoSP PublicatOm NI kWTAP AT.JUNE 3, 193 AMERICA'S FASTEST-GROWINO~WPPf Rent hkes shouldbe odest again

By AYDREW STEIN .ManhattanzBo&7ac.h P-csider.t

mornet:.mes && '.tgh am 15 zs r _ &:'- toda y. of the bultigz *wne L9 a dsippiay of a::Lifl - ;er cert previously gl er Igner .n .eertq rate usncoruectonabic twenr, the c:tya -n wa.a rurt." rmoi. Internt, blitzed ter.a.nta i-rd L"er ncr.Iz pe? a;.a."tnent by ratLe fluctuatLe wildly Iamdiors begr.ms m..dcly Smply pUL It wau boia fromn lend(rg imlttu on - - --...er' -. aner centAt when the P.en: GujGel.nes acem, 'vetaway YLU ;- to lendint g .. tlhtiOlo bar-, Board takes publc te,'t- rnote(d .e-.a.nt ,..a.in- P --'Ar&-_C wnea' Op. ouLgh to birou.igL An mony tc deter,.me tmL erat-4 vg'-e: Oe .icaLed ne ghborhood to neigb; yt&F5s rent Lfcrtamm 1he costa a Ld ord kn- Lo iAC.L ; ayrnet& borholoe_ an fewer thjab Lair year. U-ce . W.000 C'6.- nmt-ietun hias va. B=z rn e ret r't± 30 per e.-t of the cOty'* tenam~U "w'or au. " ~c&'tt Cate- ~art ~ am &C- r-&~z~t 3 -v!M.pwl the b~klldip tame nrerAme Conctwicru - salleir- "he ,~"~trt..re~CA Is 8.0 c.o.-nL.ed for in murev 0 colipefula every than-ave:.ae rent :n of orme ", -mg "~Sa n: -al. 6tn.i bed C-t.C3es &.1d an end 1z ow"-ier with ac--ss-the- bward Lncrmaa would V&aCarcy " ' C erv,r.nr AOd-g & va- C'-n< for a ?%Calof hurt larUdords who pay But even thew ca.ncy a. ou 'Axeon -. o c," e"A~ r of '.ich higher-Lia-averis tI- provernenta in rent eq.±lty -er" rL and wires- may be e ed LtLI a. M-I "..,t!. ors t.en- - '.ec"ers •oera:. .o-of sc.L.y mProft Lhwee who Ln the ru.h to cnCperm-%Le na y :...-. ,-. cc-%1t :.1- doot ref-.-Os- Or rWho burating owners for the pay lower-tan.-averagi 1v.&tdCor. of rtfr,- .e.st rites. rJanCLC~ mnort-gagVE. Pnent rz5_ Ire. . T-e . c- eqtutabie way F oweve.. Vf the G "-d.- to ad&ss Urge qumuso ,s P.z rr,ew a. s:nce the li en 3o .- d LZto e. to oeveiop a mechelUsm b,' ".arat'.shed va.ch-c. .z .- L e a p. --=.r .--. e renta for Lhe conLzrX yer. t ".. .,Le c-ap'.a. :.'.ro'e- at the Conciliations and 61:0waxrpces . tt "e- key fsa-tors indicate Ln tne past. the b,a&.,- rent t. : ',%e. L-UrvTnt. Appeals Board Lo corn- unother rmnd of rmocem enat kA trwtvidual rent r..aes L rn owner when he refi- wncma~ one wav W om Frv., tne increC.s:.. the rances h.-3 provwrty. The per-sate oU-ne. for *,' - *-p- On.ts of QW---g .en r.&. cf,,, rf re'..na.ct.-g sei ' - to Lhe CABs prov4c.ra bz!'zad P-a .. n rj;!d- .- e.- c:o'.L--t :p mr - t.e t'i s ne &2 *_h.2e !:rrtve- ft;r :aI-dqh4p and Capital- I47, or c;cer ,..t--.t. %e.U :-L- or CCr-Pn :rrDpvvement rent ZI- rno iarEr.. r Er:- : y ' : = _ y:. t" h~s -ay. owne.-2 who ':_£"-..-..- --- ')t. do,: V-.-h ,--ally !se the dlIcuit C.":- .el'-.. " .. ' - L s._&tjcn of r.nancing S,* 6renr.bilized - 7 I A .' n.. 7,

77:' . ;- -:,te the :- -- '"n - * ' a - 7.~ - - , e--..:y dc-

- .- . ,:. - " ,I A - orouch President V Idi

A Nvoto p Npoof THURSDAY, SEPTIEMBIR 1, 1983 flat r aiA I I f 11 & Mi a 2 Lets give the A , tthe people s- By ANDREW STEIN ManhattanBorough Presdent

RECENT resigna- Nearly 58 percet Of All to aUOWr deoes ftr &A .equent aw THE lengthy emergency clo- tions of Richard Ravitch captta4 money through the singe decision of an sure of parts of the sys- and John Simpson pre- 197, was spent an MW unaobuntabe MTA route. But fnr all the mol-to rqwr such struc- sent Gov..Cuomo with a tural probiems as the prime opportunity to money spent. It will stil The oondition is true make the unwieldy bu- take $J bUllon to com- today. with the MTA's an=, Avenow Line reaucracy that runs our plete the two survIvoM of much-touted five-year subways, buses and the program the Queens capital plah. as It was for trains more accountable Trunk Line and the Sec- the new routes program mige iftheshsertfals to the public it is man- ond Avenue subway. the R-46 subway car deba- in sendWgperdML And if dated to serve. In 197L. the MTA Board #.-e and subway car main- moreMimmwey I enat on For the past 15 years. agreed to purchase th the symews' Intoatrui-. it has been the particu- sirge larg subway car From the outset the lar misfortune of New order in the SYMM's 75 MTAs five yer plan di- Sf-husitgu~l Manhtta York City and its metro- yeu history: TIMR46 sb- carded the soud logic of T.: rt-,gpublic can politan area that its sin- way cars with 1W wt- replacing components at n6, long1er ndwe the gle largest public ser. ed. uDp1oves and um- the end of their useful eco- plkuers'w-b ted upon vice. used by nearly !5. known undemrriag nomlc life in favor of in- them byNthe WFA Board million people a day. is Tkdo were the kdnbous vestments in crowd plea- an4 plt6cias should no the pub. undercarriages that ine. cosmetic improve- longer ejo thte luxury utterly outside "in .SeuS!a+&re I'- lic's electoral control; crackad forcing New ments such &3shiny new of havier, their una - and the result has been York City to am the cars and brigt statons. countablo so(gates devastating. manufacturers to recover The discrepancies be- manage the syste . This August. as a re- danmages worth S0 m- tween what the system's Tb& decisions tha %Ut- sult of seriousiy deterio- lionAabout half of the cost in rastructure needs - matey afet te quality :ting subway tracks. 60 of the orgtnal purchase. track work. repairs an line and pefrim.of the system's percent of the But the price the riding euipme"t tunnels andM natio's larg t transpor- subways were either late public paid for the R-46 elevated surucztwm - and levels of capl- Lation syst'm an made or cancelled. The aver- debacle pales by compari- its planned by mrurnate &poae by age time for a ride in- son to the fleetwide devas- tal Invesmen are stag. one or more various Polit- creased 30 percent and tation the board mar- ical leader. Neither the the number of collisions dated when it voted to cut By its own assessment. mayor nor. the governor or derailments rapidly preventive subway car the MA is spending $90 ar responsile for the approached record num- maintena.nce in 2M75 dur- million lm than it needs daly oprtons of th~e bers - 13 since January. ing the city's fiscal crisis. for the next five years to sytm It is & structurr But the re-rent track T-&a-n were late and runs repair Its tracks and 250 set up topana the buck fc~r crists is only the latest in were cancelled with in- million less than It needs the deplorable conditions the 15 year legacy of creasing t-equency. By for tunnels. elevated lines of the sysm.L and line equipment M7A unaccountabilIty. January 1.98L an average But If Gov. Cuomno F-om the start, the of 430 cars a day either It doesn't take a genius never left the terminL or to predict that the short- merely changes the MTA Boar_ out of touch names and faces of the with the system's needs, br-ke down in mid-route fall in track spending will set ou. on an .-rbitous and were cancelled - a precipitate a serious rise condumo Lh could take in derailments and An tilgActive steps to newv mzute buid~g prtr- -make elected o~cials gra,. even thouzh the s 5o~irfveto bieven abrupt deterioration in years to be remedied. service. Nor does it take moresponbW for the , ri wai be ir.u--ng to system, he will continue ff ; r~r:-t ff;omn neziec' The ridizZ pubLic seems much lnsight to predict the legay oC uA.c=u- ability.

Oft~",VI V V Manhatt. Borough President Excerpte-d f rom the C SA LAR Board of Estimate

No. 76 R-M430 IN THE MATER OF a COMMI,'ICATION dated August, 11, 19, f-om the President.' Borough of Maahattan, tramrtitg the foliowing resolution which would require that before the conversion of wny" Federal Title I redevelopment projects from rental to cooperative or eordorLium ownership, appication mu.t be made to the Board of Estimate for ap- proval of such onveiona: WHEREAS, The federsl Housing Act of 1-49 provided for fnancal assistance, loam and grants to desr. replan. reconsruct and rehabiitate blighted neighbor. boods throughout the n.asion including New York City; and WHEREAS, Under "itle I of the Act, the federal government provided capital grants to the Ciry of New York to fund the acquist~ion of properzy throughout the City by condennation proceedings; and WHEREAS. The Boa-J of Estimate of the City of New York exercised its power of eirJnent domain to assemble sites for developments, thereby displacing thcusklcds Of L a .and EMJ?bus,;-~ n n~~t ,eciueo milions of pubiic doliar to Make pAsible the development of :.hek projects; and WHEREAS. Section &C of the agreement between the City of New York and Manhattantowr,. Inc.. a Title I project located in the Borough of Marhattan (now mou-n as Park West Village) dated May 22. 192. states that -for a period of forty .yeas rom the comnpletion of the project no change shall b- mrade in such projectas set forth in the redevelopment Plan attached hereto aa Schedule A mithout the con- sent of the City Pl'nning Commi:ssion and the Board of Estimte C the City"; and V71IEREAS, Se-..ion 51D(b) of the agreement betwee. the City of New York and Columbu".s CLi-Ie Apa-mments, a Tie i project located in the Borough of Manxhattjn (now lown as Coibseem Apartments) &ted Jay 15, 1953, states that -for a period of forty (40) years from the compietior. of the ho.smng project no change shall be rnade in the project as set forth in the Redeveepiment Plan of the .Aea (chedule A of t Agreemnent) without the corser.t cf the City Plaing Comn'ission and the Board of Estimat of the City or of the respective ruccesors of said Commission azd Board"; and WREREAS, Secton 510(c) of the agreement betwe-- the City of New York and New York Uriversiry/ ellevue, a Title I project lomted in the Borough of Mas ttan (now Imown as Kips Bay) dated Septwmber 3, 1954, states that "for the period of forty (40) years fronm the eompletion of the bousi;ng project no change shal be made in the housing project as set forth in the Redevelopment Plan contained in Schedu;e A of this Agreement. wi hout the consent of the City Planning Comml&- sion and the Boasrd of Esti te of the City or of the respective sucessors of said Commission and RoL-d"; and WHEREAS, The stated objective of each redevelopment plL. was -to provide housing at the lowest possibie rental wich is consis.t u 41Lh sound firacial plan- r.ing" and and to obtain thi objective the Board o! Esi.mate established below" ma- ket sales pices for the land on which the aorementioned -rje s are situated by determining the capit&alze value of the development descmibed in the redevelop- ment plan of exch projiect us-- projected per room rents substantially below the .. arket value rtnta.s, thus red-cin; the overai cost of each pro)ec: to its po.sor; and "-RR.EAS. 1:t wI ectheezr.- inttnt of the Board of Zsti.-ate to reserve its rtg'ht to de*.-:rne the appro.zAzteness of any char. e - - the redevelopment pla:ts for these projects; 2and WHEREAS, 'The t'tree -forerne.rtione Title I projec's arete "vL.ous st-es in the process of attempted conversion from rental Lo coope-at:ve or condo..irurn okehs,;: zand W' F.A'S. ,',e CJee cf t AtLorney Gener ,2cf "e State o New York has ant ,.r -her procesing of t.he conve. ions of e.,ain cf these deveopmert .ridini City Plin.'g Cornmission arid Boar-d of -Est..mate approva2. THEP.EFO E IETRESOLVED tha.: t.he ,Boa,,d of -Es::.-ae ct-ems a conver- sion .from renrta to cooper tive or condonLium ow'nership in pro)eco'. c'on.r,-cted 'under Title I o: the ?ic'-sing Act. of I~c,4.to be a c-.a.'getin "he Redeyelcpne,.: ?ian as adipted by the Board of Es:Lrnate; a-r.d BE IT FURT:-RRSC Lj.D that inorder for a Title 1 rerta; de;elopment to cenve.- to ,:oooer:-aive o.rccndomini~ic' oner-slhip Board of £t:n-.:e a;;.ova! .':'.'be

r.A4-.: -. :&'i '0. No. 2.= tne '-a:,ter w'r laid ever t.¢:-'. rnet'::g. For cc."._¢a::r,--rne r's~icn.. SKADDEN, ARP$,OtO SLATE,M4 ThtD VEU AGHER &FLOMQ oltI'S

NIW YOttK t00i*-9931

CAMS ANIMUS (in3) 371-1000 ml4 tAIMSNISPU So "SMftwo pIgw VONRO tIm Mow.$1r VwX: v55i 0..' M 3o00-' S-" WMm. T1ll7OP5Iot: 12111 "18 1064 003 NWmi040me soon~

May 18, 1984

Anne Weissenborn, Esq. Federal Election Commission Washington, D.C. 20463 Re: Pre-MUR 123

Dear Ms. Weissenborn: Pursuant to your request, I am enclosing a copy of the letter from D. H. Sawyer & Associates, Ltd. dated April 12 and copy of the letter from OSI Information Pro- cessing, Inc. The labels referred to in the OSI letter are those which were affixed to the mailings which I previously forwarded to you. Please advise me if there is anything further that you need. Very truly yours,

Thom~mk XJ. Schwar

ATrAcLfENT 2 Information Processing Inc.

May 17, 1984

Mr. Thomas Schwartz, Esq. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher and Flom 919 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022

Dear Mr. Schwartz: To clarify certain information which has been re- quested, please be advised that: OSI information Processing, Inc. and Election Co.-.uter Services, Inc. are affiliates. E.C.S./OSI has ,e-for.ed co.,uter work continuously sinte 1977 for Andrew Stein.

Our firm has produced materials covering these three areas:

1. list maintenance - opinion leaders, contributions, etc.;

2. updating of borough w-'de p,,epr voters list which was first assembled by the Ste.in '81 committee in 1981;

3. supply'ing labels throughout the peri- od of our relationship. I trust the above information will satisfy your inquiries.

§icerely,_•

Marguerite P. Marabon President

.DM: let

AmCHME~r 2-.a

575 LexingIon Avenue, Ne','. York. New York I"1O22 (212)7508,4

333 JercoTh'r - -(516) 931-707" - HS V DH60 WESTS4YE SSth STREET-. &A(dAE5LTCN.Y. 1-09.. 2,2 24 O ,EW..~ ,,..~

April 10# 1984.,

-' h

Thomas 3. Schw-.r.z. Esquire .. Scadden Arps• .. . - 919 Third Avenue

Dear Mr. Schwarz:

- iease be advised that this firm has performed no services C for A.drew Stein or any committee connected with Mr. Stein since 1981 Borouqh President election.

- Any payments received since that time were in connection * with services performed during the 1981 election, but which Swere delayed by reason of an ongoing discussion concerning :-e fees and the death of Paul Hessel, who was acting as C:) an attorney in connection with this matter. _ T

7.

ATTAHET 2-b

D :aws FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION * WASHiINGTON. D.C. 2O463*

Thomas J. Schwarz, Esquire Skadden, Arpa, Slate, Meagher and Flom 919 Third Avenue Now York, New York 10022 RE: Pre-MUR 123 and MUR 1699 Dear Mr. Schwarz;.

On May 18, 1984, the Commission notified your client, the Stein '81 Committee, of a complaint alleging violations of certain sections of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended. This notification followed receipt of your letter and memorandum of May 4, 1984, in which you asked that the Commission address issues later raised in the complainzt, The Commission, on P 1984, determined that on the basis of the information in the complaint and information provided by your client, there is no reason to believe that a violation of any statute within its jurisdiction has been committed. Accordingly, the Commission has closed its file in this matter. Tt will become a part of the public record within 30 days.

Sincerely, Charles N. Steele General Counsel

BY: Kenneth A. Gross Associate General Counsel

Enclosure First General Counsel's Report FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON. D.C. 20463"

George McDonald 211 East 81st Street New York, New York 10028 RE: MUR 1699 Dear Mr. McDonald: The Federal Election Commission has reviewed the allegations in your complaint dated May 9, 1984, and determined that, on the basis of the information provided in the complaint and information provided by the respondent, there is no reason to believe that a violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended ("the Act"), has been committed. Accordingly, the Commission has decided to close the file in this matter. The Federal Election co Campaign Act allows a complainant to seek judicial review of the Commission's dismissal of this action. See 2 U.S.C. S 437g(a)(8). Should additional information come to your attention which you believe establishes a violation of the Act, you may file a complaint pursuant to the requirements set forth in 2 U.S.C. 0: $ 437g(a)(I) and 11 C.F.R. S 111.4. c Sincerely, Charles N. Steele oGeneral Counsel

BY: Kenneth A. Gross Associate General Counsel

Enclosure First General Counsel's Report 08 L~r

lilliffilifillillill ifIII fill III S KADO EN, Arms,#919$L THIRD AT, AVE1NUEMAU Ff,-M ~-~

NEW YORK 10022-9931 CALE (ME) 37-0000 CM IAM6 8E •SMM AW EWgVoM* N O"kMA%SAOUWI?3 0Io0 Twx:?ELrJ 710 e400DGoos 3014 is "3-5008 sO mNeonu mu N.w TELE[COPIER:. 040T@M. G. Bo*00 worn, 1 0 4 w 403- GM0o0 ONE OROOIMV WILM"VT0 DELAM N0@ June 5, 1984 MOO,"" UNOAI3LEM CAUONMA OOV"

Anne Weissenborn, Esq.

Federal Election Commission - Washington, D.C. 20463 Re: MUR-1699 Dear Ms. Weissenborn: Thank you for sending me a copy of the complaint in the above MUR. Enclosed please find the Statement of Designation of Counsel by Walter (not William) McCaffrey on behalf of Stein '81. I respectfully request that this matter be merged with Pre-MUR 123 since both matters relate to the same substance and that the materials that I have sent you in connection with Pre-MUR 123 be deemed the response to MUR-1699. Please advise me if this is an acceptable procedure. QVery uly ours,

Eomas Schwarz

Encl. STATEMENT0 OF DESIGNATION OF COUNSEL9

MUR 1699 NAME OF COUNSEL: Thomas J. Schwarz ADDRESS: Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom 919 Third Avenue

New York, New York 10022-9931

TELEPHONE: (212) 371-6000

The above-named individual is hereby designated as my counsel and is authorized to receive any notifications and other communications from the Commission and to act on my behalf before the Commission.

D Signature

RESPONDENT'S NAME: Walter McCaffrey, Treasurer

ADDRESS: J5 Tre,' '4 /

HOME PHONE: 1i4a 9 /

BUSINESS PHONE: ______Mt't

:Fdrl'16tsion o±in t~xsh~~qte DC~ 2 063, •4ji SKA0itN A ,tLATE, AVFLOA MEAGHER 919 TH-10D AVENUE NEW YORK 100229931 aem on-00 CMI ADORMS "SPIMAW NEW YORh" (11) 371-oo WIC 7b0 W-3014 TELEE 64603 ,e19gao Topm. N WA ineImwO6, .6 C moo TVLECOPIEN "sO 46347e0 wit) 762 10a

1w) ROO So *U",6 O3uaMA $101 Los A55LEUIK 0IA 900 01)463-400

May 18, 1984

Anne Weissenborn, Esq. Federal Election Commission Washington, D.C. 20463 Re: Pre-MUR 123 Dear Ms. Weissenborn: Pursuant to your request, I am enclosing a copy of the letter from D. H. Sawyer & Associates, Ltd. dated April 12 and copy of the letter from OSI Information Pro- cessing, Inc. The labels referred to in the OSI letter are those which were affixed to the mailings which I previously forwarded to you. Please advise me if there is anything further that you need. Very truly yours,

Thom J. Schwar 4ii

RKj,N 1009 212 *24S 0J * 60~~~~~ .. WEST5tTRE. 4, E, .. .. 4V. : .i. . . .,--Ar"

Avs

April 10, 1984

Thomas J. Schwarz, Esquire S;,. Scadden Arps - 919 Third Avenue NY NY. Ilk

Dear Mr. Schwarz:

Please be advised that this firm has performed no services O for Andrew Stein or any committee connected with Mr. Stein since 1981 Borough President election.

Any payments received since that time were in connection with services performed during the 1981 election, but which were delayed by reason of an ongoing discussion concerning the fees and the death of Paul Hessel, who was acting as 0) an attorney in connection with this matter.

Y

"7-,H S : aws 0

Information Processing Inc.

May 17, 1984

Mr. Thomas Schwartz, Esq. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher and Flom 919 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022

Dear Mr. Schwartz: To clarify certain information which has been re- quested, please be advised that: OSI Information Processing, Inc. and Election Computer Services, Inc. are affiliates. E.C.S./OSI has performed computer work continuously since 1977 for Aundrew Stein. Our firm has produced materials covering these three areas: 1. list maintenance - opinion leaders, contributions, etc.; 2. updating of borough wide prime voters list which was first assembled by the Stein '81 committee in 1981; 3. supplying labels throughout the peri- od of our relationship.

I trust the above information will satisfy your inquiries. §i cerely, ___ i I , C f A~,

M 'rguerite P. Marabon President

',P"D: let

7 L 10.22 (212)750-8844 2 ...... " ° "-'% (5!_)931-7077 " FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION ~ WASHINGTON. D.C. 20463 May 18, 1984

George McDonald 211 East 81st Street New York, NY 10028 Dear Mr. McDonald: This letter is to acknowledge receipt of your complaint which we received on May 14, 1984, against Stein '81, which alleges violations of the Federal Election Campaign laws. A staff member has been assigned to analyze your allegations. The respondents will be notified of this complaint within five days. You will be notified as soon as the Commission takes final action on your complaint. Should you have or-receive any additional information in this matter, please forward it to this office. We suggest that this information be sworn to in the same manner as your original complaint. For your information, we have attached a brief description of the Commission's procedure for handling complaints. If you have any questions, please contact Barbara A. Johnson at (202) 523-4143. Sincerely,

Chajles N. Steele

Enclosure 0 ..

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON. D.C. 2O463

May 18, 1984

CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED William McCaffrey, Treasurer Stein '81 60 East 42nd Street New York, NY 10165 Re: MUR 1699 Dear Mr. McCaffrey: This letter is to notify you that on May 14, 1984 the Federal Election Commission received a complaint which alleges that the committee and you, as treasurer, may have violated certain sections of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended ("the Act"). A copy of the complaint is enclosed. We have numbered this matter MUR 1699. Please refer to this number in all future correspondence. Under the Act, you have the opportunity to demonstrate, in writing, that no action should be taken against the committee and you, as treasurer, in connection with this matter. Your response must be submitted within 15 days of receipt of this letter. If no response is received within 15 days, the Commission may take further action based on the available information. Please submit any factual or legal materials which you believe are relevant to the Commission's analysis of this matter. Where appropriate, statements should be submitted under oath. This matter will remain confidential in accordance with 2 U.S.C. S 437g(a) (4)(B) and S 437g(a) (12) (A) unless you notify the Commission in writing that you wish .the matter to be made public. If you intend to be represented by counsel in this matter please advise the Commission by completing the enclosed form stating the name, address and telephone number of such counsel, - 2-

If yoU have any questions, please contact Anne Weissenborn, the attorney assigned to this matter at (202) 523-4000. For your information, we have attached a brief description of the Commission's procedure for handling complaints. Sincerely,

Enclosures 1. Complaint 2. Procedures 3. Designation of Counsel Statement F 1-7 '0 WZZAArlw ja

FEDERAL ELECTION. COMMISSION WASHINGTON. D.C. 20463

MORANDUM TOz THE COMMISSION

FROM: MARJORIE W. EMONS/SUSAN M. TEIR DATE: MAY 16, 1984

SUBJECT: ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - MUR 1699 dated May 9, 1984

The attached has been circulated for your information.

Attachment GEORGE MDONAZI)M 211 East 81st 6treet New York,, New York leO2iq AtI4P:

May 9, 1984

CERTIFIED NAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED The Federal Election Commission 1325 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20463 Ladies and Gentlemen: This letter is a formal complaint under Part 11, of the Federal Election Commission Regulations, and a request for an investigation into the campaign expenditures of Stein 81, the principal campaign committee of Andrew Stein for the 1981 Manhat- tan Borough President election. Mr. Stein has filed a Statement of Candidacy with the Federal Election Commission as a candidate for Congress from the 15th Congressional District of New York, and has established a principal campaign committee for that election, under the name "Stein for Congress". I am requesting an investiga- tion as to possible expenditures by Stein 81 in support of the candidacy of Mr. Stein for Congress. Enclosed are financial reports of Stein 81 for the, periods ended January 15, 1983, July 15, 1983 and January 15, 1984. Stein 81 received contributions during those periods of $269,415, $243,500, and $275,135, respectively, mainly from corporations and from contributors who made contributions in excess of $1,000. During those periods the committee had expenditures of $154,224, $116,134, and $87,151, respectively, exclusive of the repayment of loans to Mr. Stein. During those periods, no active re-election campaign for Borough President,: was being conducted. Many of these payments appear to be of the type that would be primarily in support of Mr. Stein's candidacy for Congress. For example, allegations have been made that voter lists are being compiled by the Committee which relate only to the 15th Congressional District, which encom- passes only a portion of the Borough of Manhattan. In addition, allegations have been made that the Committee has paid for mailings that were made exclusively within the Congressional District. Enclosed 0 S

The Federal Election Commission May 9, 1984 Page 2 is a copy of articles from The Town & Village Newspaper, which report that the Committee has refused to answer questions con- cerning allegations of this type. Since the contributions received by Stein 81 are not in compliance with the federal election laws, expenditures in support of a federal election campaign would violate federal law. I am therefore making this complaint and request for an investigation by the Federal Election Commission.

Sworn and Subscribed to by me this 9th da of May, 1984.

On the 9th day of May, 1984, before me personally came George McDonald, to me known to be the individual de- scribed in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the same.

Notary Public /

DONALD . HE14MESON. JR. Notary Public, Strt- of New York No. 31-4300254 Oualified in New Ynrk Ccun y. CommissionExpires March 30',19?$ 40 - .0 LI ~ I-' --M -,at li -of t- 4 1 0 4 0 , . 0 I.. orm SSE 4- Pg. 1 (Rv. 5178) STATE OF NEW YORK *. BOARD OF ELECTIONS EOR POLITICAL COMMITTEE FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT-CANDIDATE de) (see instructions on reverse sic

STEIN - 81 Identification Number Ilull name of conoOIII o' commillOot 1= 144 president Borough of Manhattan 60 East 42nd Street 1OltiCO &POttecat SuOdmS.W4l N WOeI Democrat New York$ N.Y. 10165 ON me of Panly or Inendeflt SSa McOSy.state, sip 9 00 Check if address has changed since last statement ELECTION ON REPORT FOR_____ IwMd lp idai remeR. upeiadl

TYPE OF REPORT *CHECK ONE: 0 Candidate itemized 0 Committee itemized o Candidate in-lieu-of 30* rre O Committee in-lieu-of CHECK ONE: C3 32-day pre- primary O 32-day pre- election * January 15, 19 *3 May 15, 19 -- 000 0 11-day pre- primary C 11-day pre- election 19. tic = 27-day post-election 0 September 15, 0 27-day post-primary July 1983 X S. -C4A

CHECK IF APPLICABLE: 0 Termination report C-, Amendment to__ rport

VERIFICATION ITEMIZED IN-LIEU-OF

Walter McCaffrey (name) iname of the Treasurer of the (Treasurer. Candidate. other) for ITreasurer. Cancoate. Other) for STEIN 81 (Name of comrmttfev or offi"e or pany @stion) ewe doaI oo offico or partv Iposstlioni state eeved nor expenowed more n oneme Na"e of committee being mae haoe not not 9a4 .nftetOration conoined hereon dokW irm Conneh with thiS campagn. O.olswe"* to Arloie 14 o fthe Election Law is on all ve- t *l' 0to the est Of r ry . nOwledge. *nformalioi Ci: Oi*4*.

rA • qp -- feegnalure) r-- Ste flat I S

ANY FALSE STATEMENT MADE IN THE WITHIN STATEMENT IS PUNISHABLE LAW. AS A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO SECTION 210.45 OF THE PENAL

o- , m -,4 .

J -W.4 46"

;BE 4.)an. 1978-pq. 2 SUMMARY PAGE

Candidate Statement: Complete Sections A, B, C, D. Do not include in this statement receipts and expenditures which are included in a political committee report.

Committee Statement: Complete- Sections A, B, C, D, E.

4w

Primary General-r Section A - RECEIPTS (this period): Eection Special Electio. (Column A) (Column B) LINE NO.: *243v500-00 s Contributions Itemized (Schedule Al) 1 Monetary S.. 2 } Unitemized 3 Contributions other than money (Schedule A2) 4 Sub-total Contributions (add lines 1 through 3) S ._ _ _ _ _ ,a ______S 5 Refunds of Contributions (Schedule A3) S 2 4 3 '_5 0 0 "0 0 6 Total Contributions (subtract line 5 from line 4) 7 Loans Received this period (Schedule A4) $ m . m n .. E .. m m...... 8 Transfers In (Schedule AS) 9 Other Receipts (Schedule A6) 10 Total of net receipts and contributions other than money $ 243,50O.0 0 ,,, $ ____ ...._ , (add lines 6 through 9)

Section B- DISBURSEMENTS (this period): 11 Itemized (Schedule B1) s 58,271.46 s $_ 187.50 s 12 Net campaign Disbursements Unitemized and Expenditures in-kind Expenditures In-Kind 13 (In support of one or more A2) candidates) (Schedule 5- 14 Refund (Schedule 52) s- 15 Total (add lines 11 through 13 less $ 58,458.96 s line 14)

16 Non-campaign Disburse- (constituted and party ments committee only) s 120000.00 s 17 Repayment of loans (Schedule B3) I 57,676.80 s 18 Transfers Out (Scnedule B4) $ 177,676.80 $ 19 Total Other Disbursements (add lines 16 through 18) 20 Total of net Disbursements and Expenditures in-kind (add lines 15 and 19) s _-236,135.76 s ;

WIVY -- 'IF

I

£-°4; ~1 '4 IJ '4 U 'I ~) ~ PAGE 2 16 SJan. 1978-pg.3 SUMMARY

on C-Cash Balance (Columns A & B)

Cash Balance at Beginning of this period (enter amount from previous report line 25 or if this is first report, $ 15.11 enter zero) Total of Net Receipts and Contributions Other than 243,500.00 Money this period (add line 10 columns A & B) $ 243,515.11 Total (add line 21 and 22) 236v135.76 Total of Net Disbursements and Expenditures In-kind this period (add line 20 columns A & B) Cash Balance at End of this Period $ 7,375.35 (subtract line 24 from line 23)

Financial Status Pulmaiy Gengrutor cfion D-Campaign Election Special section (Column A) (Column B)

THIS PERIOD which 26 Liabilities (excluding loans) Incurred S are still outstanding (Schedule C1) S. 7 Uabilities (excluding loans) Outstanding from PREVIOUS PERIODS (liabilities line 28 of previous report less Iiabil- $ Ities which have been paid; If first repcrt enter zero) S S 2 Total liabilities Outstanding (add lines 26 and 27) Net Campaign Disbursements and Expenditures in-kind !9 1,187,427.80 PREVIOUSLY REPORTED (enter line 31 of previous re S p"ort or if this is first report enter zero) 58,458.96 10 Net Campaign Disbursements and Expenditures in-kind S THIS PERIOD (enter line 15) n1 Total Net Campaign Disbursements and Expenditures $ 1,235,886.76 in-kind to date (add lines 29 and 30) 12 Total Net Campaign Disbursements and Expenditures in- kind to date and liabilities Outstanding (add lines 28 and 245,500.00 31) S

246,500.00 13 Total loans Outstanding

°.•

. .,. . • qpp° 4 Jan. 1978-pg.'4: SUMMARY PAGE Section E - Allocation of Total Campaign Finances to Candidate(s) supported by this committee. (If a candidate authorization or non-authorization has not been filed for each candidate sup- ported, such a statement must be filed with this report.) column B. (1) Enter Line 32 column A on Line 54 column A; enter Line 32 column B on Line 54 (2) List each of the candidates supported by this committee on Lines 34 thru 53. 53 Column A. (3) Allocate Line 54 A to each of the candidates: enter amounts in Lines 34 through column B. (4) Allocate Line 54 B to each of.the candidates: enter amounts in Lines 34 thru 53

Accumulative Allocation of Campaign Finances to Cawdae. --" ""0 CANDIDATE PRIMARY ELECTION GENERAL OR SPECI" 5 5 (Column A) ELECTION (Column E LAST NAME FIRST NAME amount percent amount po, .- 100 B.P. Man STEIN ANDREW 1,235,886.76

__l-1 F _ 1n '1 _ _ ' __%_S te__thesame_235,8116.______I

,,.

_ _ _ I __ _ 1 I

• 1 . ,1 ,

______"___ iIO *A:L:c- &lne3 "n ,ae______*1

* .5..J. ~

I u- 4 u-- 6 413

0

ME 4 Jan. 1978-pq. 5 MONETARY CONTRIBUTIONS

CA )FFICIAL Period PorG USE CON Al Identification AMOU TE 0m FULL NAME MAILING ADDRESS :CEIVED 13

Ile

'0000.-k f2 - C L I-

~yf'43___r______or -

~. C,'.. C AF 9, -...z e..-,? Xe7;

c... /~~~~~I -4ee?' e5QA&1Pr-/X

____ loo3A- ______- ~00A1,~a'

/~ ooo.-z -- S~ *f'~C _____4 W- At2M -1!12f 34,.

i7Cf~...___o ___ ~//~~%fw t rc __ _ __ IF~e ______f

Z __ __ 711.3 ~ /e~ge, /d Z

FORWARD ! -TOTAL OR BALANCE SCIEDULE A BE4 Jan. 1978-p% MONETARY CONTRIBUTIONS

iFFICIAL CA USE CON Al Identification Peiod P or G Control USE CO

MAILING ADDRESS AMOUIT E m_ FULL NAME EIVED E7

i-~

222-- lr 17CC A SA77_1

/, A "I442 ~~-'~ /, 3t A'-- 'Ii

1r3 -<6 4L - , - " , 2,i 2---_. 0-->1....o.. . -

-- -- i /,00 !rev'~ ______.

• 1. _ _ _ _ -ii______l .. ... gl' ..

_ _ _ _ _ ,S',go+,< , jr r r - . / ?._ _- , ___ -<, - ._---......

i_.. ++,._ -- _~ ,-, _ _ _ i _, _ _III__ _ 'A4i'-,s _ _ .- I J...... _ 4"o

TOTAL OR BALANCE FORWXARD

JL ado "

CIEWULE A CONTRIBUTIONS SBE 4 Jan. 1978-pi. 5 MONETARY

CA Al Identificition Period PorG Coto FFICIALEi~ CON I co- ADDRESS AMUN TE FULL NAME MAILING ~CEIVED

- .1- g i3&A ______01___ 4-; e

'I, -I___

,~ 1? . F7_A14£ t 13/-- 1. rpok ~'j a 3 ~ ~ A 4 ~~-~ ?~~ ~~.

____~ t~a.._4A~ &~______5,10- 7 IC ,e?-4J~ Acpo*A4/'f6V 77 4g L 7

TOTAL OR PALANCE FORWARD 2 43, 500.0

b. ------u

* • , .* o o I. • SCHDUL

* So . SCHEDULE 81 4 Jan. 1978-pIJ.3 DISBURSEMENTS F. PURPOSE OF AMOUNT DISSURSEMWN E PAID . FULL NAME MAILING ADDRESS

Z~"- ,,6e n r,, | N 2v ei e r __

___-______S~fO ''O JAd,,Cd"

7)z ',___ ,7.- al, 6 .Ae"gog-c - I

~.Ldi~ ~-~c-i i ....,wf1 i~ S7i 27_C, - __.

V .. .0. ..~Y ..... 7,...

a."o.* 4. __ _._.._,, '//] 2P /.-. .4 -. -4 oIa 7/,~ C 7~. 'SIP

______

4~~ ~ ~ cZ ______R / ,I ,

TOTAL OR BALANCE FORWARD 5 8,2 71.4 6

123If 4 6 in --- A.' - - I--- "06 ------.dwo ---

r'~~~w~s~w'-9 w---0 Jhn. 1978*pg. 9 SCeD~utLE 1B- AMON FLNAEMAILING ADDRESS 7E NAMEREFUNDED' NDED FULL

-TOTAL

P2 REPAYMENT OF LOANS ______SCHEDULE ADDRESS AMOUNT DATE OF LOA. JEPAIDI FULL NAME MAILING

/)'~ -3______

TOTAL 120#000

TRANSFERS OUT SCHEDULE 8~ orO0 lal C TRO Al identification Period P

______* Co -______MAILING ADDRESS AMOUNT E PAID I FULL NAME

"S349 6 CC.,/

7)___ .3.~~4 ______70 3 3z. 't1.2;40."L~

£fa..,4)A ______TOTAL_ 13OARD OF ciC01IN - CANDIDATE OR POLITICAL COMMITTEE FINNCALDISLOSRESTATEMENTFINANiAL ISCLSURE(see instructionls on reverse side)

Identificatio~n Number Stein 81 Iwo. nae ofc~n@'Cess .of commoi.Ie

60 East 42nd Street JOIICO L Poldicals wUbO'ssnj 15110911 N~ew York, N.Y. 10165 rnofM. Party 0 w ven"eM S@Gv Uctsle. a aool) Check if address has changed since lasot statement.

REPORT FOR______ELECTION ON _____ was.) 1primary, general. 611,06811

TYPE OF RkP0RT

CHECK ONE: 0 Candidate itimized S Ce Committee iriized-* 0 Candidate in-lieu-of C Committee in-lieu-of CHECK ONE: election 4Januas 15, 19 84 -* D32-day pre- ~ * 0O 32-day pro- 111-day pre- primary 0 11-day pre.- election O'MayIS, 19- ~1~ [3 27-day post-primary C27-day post-election o September159 19.... -

-CHECK IF APPLICABLE: 0 Termination report 0Amendment to report

VERIFICATION ITEMIZED IN-LIEU-OF Walter McCaffrey Is (rt" Ira"') of the Treasurer .of the for firasumt. C"rti. othe) for cTrrawuro'. Cangodaic. olnr) Stein 81 ! crailiietCof or ollisctof@1 an7posht~i) mswi t Is I%-* ell Ineeofeit. ieeor Party P..itier1 aisle IName oet'9Pal@a cae'ieon.Cnerain being ma~o* have nos recev nor expenood mote thml one IlioubwoG VOWSOW&O16Ar.Ctice4 4Theecieeft Law is 5in sit to- GllarS Wicone'Oisofwihthis arrapeeg. =090 toueet ie%#beUr of mV kb.Atvgo. intlotmolooei s"'564

'an.**1984 ui&~rI t Isignetule) ANY FALSE STATEMENT MADE IN THE WITHIN STATEMENT IS PUNISHAB.LE AS A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO SECTION 210.45 OF THE PENAL LAW.

-. -1 - - C **'* :.

41

4r I ae P down

0 --1 4 j -- I %F -1 %0 .,o %F v If SUMMARY PAGE BE 4 Jan. 1978-pg. 2

receipts and Sections A, B, C, D. Do not include in this statement Candidate Statement: Complete report. expenditures which are included in a political committee A, B, C, D, E. Cnmmittee Statement: Complete Sections

Primary General or Special Electic' Section A - RECEIPTS (this period): Election (Column A) (Column 9) LINE NO.: .___ _ S 264,585.0'.' Al) 1 Monetary Contributions Itemized (Schedule Unitemized 2 $__S - A2) $______3 Contributions other than money (Schedule 3) 5-S 4 Sub-tota'l Contributions (add lines 1 through (Schedule A3) 5 Refunds of Contributions S . i 4) 6 Total Contributions (subtract line 5 from line s-______s 761o.iqo: 7 Loans Received this period (Schedule A4) AS) 8 Transfers In (Schedule $______S 450.0: A6) 9 Other Receipts (Schedule $275,135.0: money 10 Total of net receipts and contributionis other than (add lines 6 through 9) mira

(this period): Section 8- DISBURSEMENTS s __ 81,595.0c. 81) 11 Itemized (Schedule Unitem.zed 12 Net campaign Disbursements $ .. S _____ and Expenditures in-kind In-Kind 13 (In support of one or more Expenditures (Schedule A2) candidates) s5- Refund (Schedule 82) 81,671.9" Total (add lines 11 through 13 less line 14)

• 4 . P UtJf I 16 Non-campaign Disburse- constiuuaua v ,' 19500. C. only) -______ments Committee _ _ _ S17 9*.C 17 Repayment of loans (Schedule B3) $S s ,480. C:. 18 Transfers Out (Schedule B4) (add lines 16 through 18) 1 9"Total Other Disbursements 20 Total of net Disbursements and Expenditures in-kind 26665196 (add lines 15 and19)

-MR",W qr-"Fw- Jan. 1978-pg.3 SUMMARY PAGE ion C -Cash Balance ENO. (Columns A & B) Cash Balance at Beginning of this period (enter amount from previous report line 25 or if this is first report, 7,375.35 enter zero) $. Total of Net Receipts and Contributions Other than Money this period (add line.10 columns A & B) $ 275,135.00 1 0 Total (add line 21 and 22) 2 2.5 35 Total of Net Disbursements and Expenditures in-kind $,266,651.96 this period (add line 20 columns A & B)$, Cash Balance at End of this Period (subtract line 24 from line 23) .15.

Pdrmary General or section D -Campaign Financial Status Election Special Election (Column A) (Column B)

26 Liabilities (excluding loans) Incurred THIS PERIOD which S are still outstanding (Schedule C1) $ Liabilities (excluding loans) Outstanding from PREVIOUS PERIODS (liabilities line 28 of previous report less liabil- $ $ Ities which have been paid; if first .I -lenter zero) $ $ 28 Total liabilities Outstanding (add lines 26 a.,id 27) 29 Net Campaign Disbursements and Expenditures in-kind PREVIOUSLY REPORTED (enter line 31 of previous re- 1,235,886.76 s port or If this is first report enter zero) 30 Net Campaign Disbursements and Expenditures In-kind 81,671.96 $ THIS PERIOD (enter line 15) 31 Total Net Campaign Disbursements and Expenditures $ 1,31.7,558.72 in-kind to date (add lines 29 and 30) 32 Total Net Campaign Disbursements and Expenditures in- kind to date and liabilities Outstanding (add lines 28 and 31) a s $si$

33 Tota! loans Outstanding

- -- i''- :-~ ~.. -q_ . -- i3;p

.9.

. - iil PAGE Jan. 1978-pg. 4 SUMMARY committee. (if a of Total Campaign Finances to Candidate(s) supported by this Section E*-'Allocation flied for each candidate sup- candidate authorization or non-authorization has not been ported, such a statement must be filed with this report.) B. A: enter Line 32 column B on Line 54 column (1) Enter Line 32 column A on Line 54 column on Lines 34 thru 53. (2) List each of the candidates supporled by this committee amounts in Lines 34 through 53 Column A. (3) Allocate Line 54 A to each of the candidates- enter enter amounts in Lines 34 thru 53 column B. (4) Allocate Line 54 B to each of the candidates: of Campaign Finances to Ca&.'.: C DAAccumulative Allocation em 2 CANDIDATE PRIMARY ELECTION GENERAL OR SPE%. I (Column A) ELECTION (Column 5 - owcentl amount LAST NAME FIRST NAME amount 1,317,558.72 B.P. Man Stein Andrew ------

---I II

------" - -. I In ut ntis ie&ln 2$ 37%5 .2 10%

Imust be the same "-- .- .

-- All S------I-

-m- 6(t4t~DULL Jfan. .1/0p.

FICIAL CA Period PorG Control Identification USE CON Al MAILING ADDRESS CFULL NAME' EIVED~~ d Park N.Y. 1200 lJnion Turnpike New Hyde Litwin I- ,19831 Leonard 10016 2, 000. 575 Park Avenue South NYVC red"3 Manocherian i- iI 3000 Marcus Ave Lake Success ,NY 11042 4,000. 83 I Jeffrey Glick S -1345Ave of the Americas NYCI0 at 83 IHoeard Rubenstein 10022 1,000.- 81Julia Robinson 6415th Avenue New York, N.Y. 1,000. Arrigoni R',nnv- N-YV 1fl47 83 Edward II gbF IjI lse~~"0* IV -ftf i -, Shearson American Express 83 IIds 14 -ll Ctrpat t4w York.NYJ1000 11.9000. c Im I': I-.i Stv VfiEJf NY 10023 PC, II~ I Lincoln Plaza New York, LOW rt330 MendikMadison Avenue Nevi York, NY 10017 600.C 60% 83j mend i1k 30Mdo101 N.Y. 10041 300.'C Peter Solomon 55 Water Street New York, 100 William Street New York, NY 10038 OO00.C 83 Seymour Cohn 600.C B.L. Schwartz 955 5th Avenue New York, N.Y 10021 New York,NY 10024 l50.. 183 Mrs. M.F. Polayes 27 West 87th Street New York, N.Y10024 300.C 183 Dr&rs Maurice Goo.'. 171 West 79th Street NYC 10021 300.1'. /83 Marjorie Sachs 196 East 75th Street 330 West 72nd Street NYC 10023 90.(C /83 Judy Singer . New York, N.Y. 135. / 183 1 Christopher Leei 330 West 72nd Street N.Y.. I 90- /83 i Angelo C. Paoino. 171 Faningdale St Islip 45. /83 Rosemary Palino .171 Farmingdale St;. Islip,NY 100. /83 Esther B. Wolf 1240 Central Park West NYC Park Wst NYC 10023 25. 183 Jan Levy 115 Central

NYC 600. /83 tJFT 260 Park Avenue South 83Transport Work:-.s 1980 Broadway_ 200.' S00. i/3 Helene+Sidney Stein 241 Central Park West NYC TOTAL CR BALANCE FORWARD - 28,035.00_ VVIN .4

I VVM isTTI g.9--68 bLAnIPlIM&L r

ICIAL" CAIii CON Al Identification Period. P orG Control USE AMOIN CO:" m FULL NAME---- MAILINGADDRESS ".--

3..1 Alison R. Mager 500 5th Avenue NYC 10017 •61"50C.C

i Peter Mager 500 5th Avenue NYC 10017 ___

On €thS Avpnue NYC 10017 I I I M4Lq.p 13,300. 0:- 3 I axnal nii. ,_r_ _ %,1v...... _ .... 3 Harry Silveman 888 7th Avenue New York, NY 10116 0900c, C 3_ _ohn Radziwill 834 Sth Avenue New York; N.Y. 10021 o*1. Street NYC 10021 2,O0.C 3 1 1 Warner LeRoy 1317 East 64th NYC 10010 5C.C 3 1 LaRossa, Axenfeld &Mitchell. 141 ..Madison Avenue Street NYC 1 00%.0C_ 3 I I Admarketing Exchange Media 422East 29th 10021 ,,"" ro- 3 I L e Schwat o ny1944 5th Avenue NYC S 1 Arnold Kimmel. 20SO.LC Avenue RockvlejNY 20:.C_ ~ I~Sanford M. Litvack 505 N. Village 20:.C a3rKevin McGrath 1-330 Madison Avenue NYC Avenue NYC 10021 10C 83 Sigmund Wahrsager 1700 Park 3 I....Serres,Visione &Rice Inc. 1108 Greenwich Street NYC 10016 19o~ 0 C' 25C.0'_ 17'1: Joseph Solomon 1153 East 53rd Street NYC 10022

Road HarrisonNY 10528 25.C 3 Stanley M. Grossan 34 Sterling i-ri Andrew G. Racz 444 East 86th Street NYC 1002820. ;n-rr 3Benenson Capital Company I380 Madison Avenue NYC 106~7 50:%,. C 3... I 1Herbert Rubin 40. Wall Street NYC 10005 10017 M.A._ 3'... Lawrence Rosenbiuth 1342 Madison Avenue NYC Lustigran I 747 3rd Avenue NYC'10017 1: ___Bass, Uliran & Harrison NY10528 sc:.c 3__ Peter Fishbein 1101 Woodlands Road Madison Avenue NYC 10022 W0:.C 3 David Muss 635 521 5th Avenue s0:.X 3 Glaser, Shandell& Blitz TOTAL OR BALANCE FORWARD lo 119,450.00

-.- .a d-

° .-- u~-w . - - - - ~wI~TrJ 5-i~-7-'J *' ~ - ~7

ICIAL. CA' Period P orG Control JSE CON Al Identification CO MAILING ADDRESS IVED ~ NAMAE IvEDI~ IFULL S

Beach, Fl 33480 3I Michael Singer I-44 Cocoanut Road Palm Iv,OtL3. ( i 345 Park Avenue NYC'10154 2,5C0.C I I I tik~ Rd,,rn SCO.C 83- I InLit6wtz berger 99 Park Avenue NYC 10016 83 j Virgil Gladieux .2630 Lasket Rd ToledoOhio4313,otO.cc ______1.0~. C 83S. 83 IKornreich& I Sons, Inc _919 3rd Avenue NYC 10022 83 j 1 1Arnold Stream ' 717 3rd Avenue NYC 10017 25 .0L 893 Helen Guthrie N. 521. 5th Avenue NYC____ 1 jawrenceL83 Levine 40 East 38th Street NYC 100161 83 1i eo Jaffee 711 5th Avenue NYC 10022 I f83 Potamkin Cadillac l lth Ave at 54th. Street NYC 10019 . ,C2O.: 83 W lsSBurrows 514 West 49th Street NYC 10019 250.- Park Avenue NYC 10152 110 '83 1 Joseph. S. Ro *^n 375 10011 230.' 183 I Nelson Seitef 111 8th Avenue NYC Ave CrstwoodNY 1070712,Sfl.Z 18 Richard J. Fay 481 Westchester /83 Charles Allen, Jr. 711 5th Avenue NYC 10022 ISOM Elmont, NY11003 1,COO. ,83 1 Leon Dematteis 820 Elmont Road,

1 SC0.. - 265 East Street66th StreetNYC 10005 NYC . 10021 •40 1.,3.: 183(83 /8cJffrehan.I I Mcmahan, Brafman,Epstein MOrgan& Co. 40WLOSreDYC105."Wall

NYC 10017.5,0O. /83 Bernard H. Mendik 330 Madison Avenue 500. 183 Harvey Rosen 220 Madison Avenue NYC 10016 10022 100. /83 Shorenstein& Shorenstein 595 Madison Avenue.NYC 125 Park Avenue NYC 10017 . 1,coo. /83 _ _ Stephen E. Smith 530 7th AvenueNYC 10018 P83 Abraham Shrader Robert S. Pirie Aquila Farm Hamilton, Mass. 01936 250.

23,350.00 .. TOTAL OR BALANCE FORWARD

1. dL

fVpw W%*Aoo WvWIOG

FICIAL • CA* orG Control I Identification Period P USE. CON Al FULL NAME MAILING ADDRESS AMOSr, IVED1I z a 1,50O.Vol ee Vti riif 230 Park Avenue NYC 33 1 Charl !brL L " W ," --- - I Snn-l ast 77th Street NYC 10162 ii t..- .I - J fl.64 1%1 .. 1oalI narolaa1 anoU nULoii ,,t ...... 10025 1 $000 S3 1Lawrence Spellman 22 West 96th Street NYC Saul Pearce 230 Park Avenue NYC g3 III Alan Aronsohn 200 East 82nd Street NYC IIoo. 83II Mathew Silvermanj 230 Park Avenue I rjrjC.0 A. IrvingI N amI 7Ailliam 83 Messina Gloria JoseDhson 745 5th Avenue NYC ,7_5.C C. 83" Robert Edwards 460 Sylvan Ave,Englewood Cliffs,N.J. I C. 83 Alice Sachs _ 83 I Tanebaum Harber Co 221 West 57th Street NYC IOC.C 83 Tufo & Zuccottl 645 Madison Avenue NYC 10022 4,OOC.C 83 KSB Broadway Associates 1 165 Duane Street NYC 10013 0,00C.C 83 J HRO International 575 Madison Avenue NYC 10022 0, .r. 83 Arthur Emil 791-Park Avenue NYC 2,50?.C 2,0Op.C 83 1 Peter Kalikow - 101 Park Avenue NYC

iiI ___ 83 x __ Timex Garage Corpi .50 Park Avenue NYC '83 X Rollex Garage Corp 345 East BOth Street NYC -. ,50:.c '8 X Kalikow Construction Corp. 101 Park Avenue NYC 1,50". '83 500 Park Avenue Associates " 90 Park Avenue NYC I1,50:.C '83 N.J. Kalikow 101 Park Avenue.NYC 2,00. 383 Minor Associates Rockefeller Plaza NYC 10.C 83 Ed Downe 15,00:.1 1/83 1 Carol Realty 00______79. 250.00 TOTAL OR BALANCE FORWARD

.° . a-A. -A - -CL 'o - , pI P - --.- -I . OWI ,Sam MY U 'His

FICIAL" CA • CA CON Al Identificalion Period PorG Control JSEU-. COc ...... I MAILING ADDRESS . AMO%.: FULL NAME EIVED1 0

I I I I NYC 10019 "' 13 Sidney E. Cohn 1370 Ave of the Americas NYC 10036 251 13 I Muiligan & Jacobson 25 West 45th Street j 3 I I 1CvilService Ret. Emp.Assoc. 267 Broadway NYC 10007 ,20. 10:.( 33 Leonard Toboroff, P.C. • 425"Park Avenue NYC 203j B3 Saul Shames ;. 767 3rd Avenue NYC. 10017 83 II _Abraham Hilrschfeld 336 East 61st Street NYC 10021SM. I SM.t 3 1 I , AaronJ. Broder 350:5th Avenue B3 I I Kenpart Realty 1909 3rd Avenue 2,00:.C Angelesi" Ca.I ,00:.c 8 I TechnicolorService 2049 Central Park EastLos Road Great NeckNY o:. -4 575 5th Ave Associates 1111 Great Neck --- - _--.,

I_ 1: ____

______58. 0 _ _ _ _LAC__ TOTA _ _

______I--o .... . -

TOTAL OR BALANCE FORWARD 264,585.00

S**,...... -ra . SCHEDULL AS .4Jan.. 8p 7 ~Th~i~f-TffT CA Pot G AL TRI A61 identification Period

AMOLNtv V q-DFULLNAMEj MAILING ADDRESS INew Yorkers for Stein I______10,000.0r.

i tanley Michaels, Friends of Vioo

TO&19 0.0

OTE REEITS____U -

I. FUL~~ ~ AM ______~ AIIN ~ADES ~~ I*INYE

IV 12REf0

83- ______Palae_'Co_1564_roadwaNework,-IY_4_5_'.'0_

TOTAL40100.0 a-- ie DS OF DIS UF- I ifh ffs SCHEDULE B." FULL NAME . MAILING ADDRESS1 AMOUr.N DEDO . I REFUNL£: •.I I I I SI. I -

TOTAL

REPAYMENT OF LOANS SCHEDULE B' PAID I FULL NAME MAILING ADDRESS AMOUNT 0DTE CF L:-

/83 Andrew Stein 38 East 85th Street NYC 20,000.00 /83 Andrew Stein 38 East 85th Street*NYC 5,000.00

/83 Andrew Stein 38 East 85th Street NYC 2S,000.00 "

84 Andrew Stein 38 East 85th Street NYC 10,000.00

______.00 ...... _ 1 7 9 , 50 0 1 T'OTAL 179,500.00

TRANSFERS OUT .SCHEDULE CA AlIdentification gTRO Period P orG Co PAID: FULL NAME MAILING ADDRESS AMOUKN 33 1Human RiQhts.CamDaion Fund iiiii 150.00 3 jPulaski Associates 61-60 56th Road Masbeth,NY 1*1"378 100.00

,83 tam a nd. Democrats I 50.00 '83 j New Dem Club ._.. _ - 125.00 ,83'83 ,,""I VlO 100.00 '83 jJefferson Dem Club "400.00 '83 Friends of Carolyn Maloney •_70.00

34 Independent Democratic Club 100.0

34 Gay Mens Health Crisis 50.00

34 tew Democratic Coalition 200.60

34 Gay"Mens Health Crisis 100.00 ___ TOTAL 5,480.00

I --- ow llljltljwl=1111111111111111 NDS OF DISBUTMEN SCHEDULE 8.

I I-AM U i 'EDOED_ ____,UN FULL. NAME MAILING ADDRESS • 0.*

•IPalae 64ro,."Broadway 'I New York, N.Y. 10036 1450.

TOTAL

7

REPAYMENT OF LOANS . SCHEDULE PAID I FULL NAME MAILING ADDRESS AMOUNT [DATE OF -.0 /83/8 Andrew Stein 38 EatEast 85th5h"treNC StreetNYC 25,000.00 21/83 Andrew Stein 38 East 85th Street NYC" 11500.00

.713 Andrew Stein - 38 East 85th Street NYC 27,000.00

7/83 1 Andrew Stein 38 East 85th Street NYC 25,000.00. 10/83 1 Andrew Stein 38 Last 85th Street NYC 20,000.00_• TOTAL

TRANSFERS OUT SCHEDULE E CA.CA TRO Al Identification Period P or a CO . ... _.. . .. AMOU .1, PAID', FULL NAME MAILINGADDRESS ( 83 ICommittee to elect J. Birnbaum ______. i00."

83 Friends of James McManus 319 West 48th Street NYC 500.0: 83 ItNAACP Show of Shows 100.0:

83 1Liberal Party 1560 Broadway.-.2,500.0: 83 !Cornittee for Alicea+Quinn . 20.0:

83 Friends of Stern+Gonzalez 656 West 181st Street NYC 20.0: 83 Community Free Democrats 506 Amsterdam Ave NewYork, N.Y.NY 120.0

'83 Friends of Gonzalez 656 West 181st Street New York, N.Y.

83 4Committee for Elaine Par-ker ______0.__L . 83 1GL D 300.C".• -- 83 I GMHC R osnroP TOTAL

,T. 44 Li' PURPOSE OF MAILING ADDRESS AMOUNT DISBURSEL: I ID FULL NAME newspaper ad South NYC 1,176.00 /B3 Tovm andVillage 235 Park Avenue 6,000.00 /83 D. H. Sawyer-Associates 18th Street NYC 1,000.00 printing /83 1 Goldmark Group 6 West New York, N.Y. 1,400.00 :3 Postmaster GPO 100.00 Sierra Club 18th Street NYC 2,750.00 printing 13 Goldmark Group 6-Vest Drive NYC 10025 185.00_contribution 33 IDance Base Inc. 276 Riverside GPO New York, N.Y. 29000-00 postage 3 IPostmaster II 1,000.00 postage 9/83 1Postmaster GPO New York, N.Y. 175.00 ad Vote W/83 INY Gay reimursec 350.00 expenses 3/83I Petty, Cash -I______600.00 AIRIdA*4 @nujpBrooklyn, NY I Ia 23/83 IJewish Press -- 4 1. w ...... J.._.." - - -- ______%__.. East 46th Street NYC 10017 82.50 photos -31/83 %I,.odernage 325 York, N.Y. 310.00 postage k/83 Postmaster GPO New Sreimburse-., NYC NYC 951.35 expenses 2/83 lAndrew Stein 38 East 85th Street Lexington Avenue NYC 10022 665.00 IIhlcute '14/83 OSI 575 S.O-00 a 10 FaIt ?3rd Strapt NYC Srppt NYC- 10.0 contrib'ation J118ohn Paul Centpr 103 Ft 7th Or 19 Cliff Street NYC 100.00 contri buti postage GPO New York, NY 700.00 '19/83 IPostmaster .----..- !I ,, 4,k, 315 7th Avenue NYC I 250.00 exvenses ]Michae1 I '19/83 Bataglino ...... 4 - I m _ _ i ."250.00 Avenue NYC 10022 anaflcoc 575 Lexinoton mmmm m .CJ4-m-im - --- 83 0.S. _ I- -i- --f - . 2nnfn a .A- --- A. I'*1 tO lO, " mev.4- m 1 ,"l.e. F. osc-1 Eft S'th -t tXC'Y'I I Z..U Ift.n mburse:T I 250- 0 I !stamos )/8/83 Petty Cash ______I. 100.00 contrlbut~c'r 350 West 125th Street NYC 100.00 Tree Fund Icontribt'scr ' ).19/83j Chrisnas I - - -S - - t - -.-- I a iY*in,~t raa~n~ i I 50tn0.r00-ncI Broadway at 47th Street NYC ,9500.00 expense ).20183 Palace Theatre' I ,K I -4 78.00 reimburSes 713 Humboldt Dtreet Brooklyn,NY 78.00 rimureie 4/20/83 j David Grodhulski I II I 661.78 ______575 Lexington Avenue NYC i computer O-S- I )/23/63 I -I r-3I JL 661.7 34,084.63 TOTAL OR BALANCE FORWARD

- 4.' v WNW dbft. Jan. 1978-p9.8 isu E EkTO SCHEDULE 21

PAID FULL NAME MAILING ADDRESS PURPOSE V=

Paul Frnd. Center 103 East 7th Street NYC 75.00 contrlbuti-, r2l/331John I Sen Cit. 221831La Famille 2017 5th Avenue NYC "500.00 Fent 22/831BrillLiquor 150 Chambers Street NYC 268.11 l2/83ZaleKoff Graphics 435 Hudson Street NYC 3,000.00 printirro fh/83 ID. Sawyer Associates 5,000.00 consultant /83 jPostmaster G.P.O. New York, N.Y."- 2,000.00 postage computer 8Election Computer Services 575 Lexington Avenue NYC 2,826.00 Avenue NYC 728.65 jComputer 83 jElection Computer Services 575 Lexington 240.00 computer P83 lHarry Cotlen 183 ;tarts Clark 240.. 240.00 183 ILillian Rouplis 183 f.illiam Devalle 240.00 ,

. Van Ness 210.00 . 183 I 6@ S /83 rank Urso '20O0.0 /83 Ilfred Hughes 150.00 art work 183 ostmaster GPO NYC 800.00 postage

S4 ostmaster GPO NYC ,.000.00 postage 61.06 reimbursed 34 latne Parker . copere 2000.00 computer 34 Sol*_575 Lexington AvenueNYC

34 ostmaster G.P.O NYC ,000.00 0tag

34 Zale Koff Graphics Inc. 1411;,,cnn Street NYr 0,000.00 pinting 34 East 3rd Street Association 100.00 contribut':.r

34 Mandlers 222 Grand Street NYC 51.90 supplies Postmaster G.P.O. NYC 2,000.00 postage

33,900.72 TOTAL OR BALANCE FORWARD WY~ -. I r

p -= 1 NEV! toip: *a q *JOlslmWW64w - y &JAW r ~"*~* *-.- m 01 I WI PURPOSE - MAILING ADDRESS v FIAMOUNTI AID FULL NAME 17DISSURSEhb,--. i ' ' reimbursed PO Box 1597 NYC 185.00 expenses /33 1Tom Cusick contributior n ...-n,,... ir= A,, rat v 125.06 L o Washinoton. D.C. I I I . Uvo; crUL i t. Ic mn L. ,,, e..Ug'sj.. - .. reimbursed Pat Pacifico 747 10th Avenue NYC 125.00 expenses 1 . 00 reimbursed 3. St1,ichael Battqglino 315 7th Avenue NYC " 2.0 exoenses Postmaster G.P.O. NYC 7,000.00 ioostage 300.00 €Contributio- 83 INat. Alliance against Violence. 1W.Sgth StPark Committee.,,o 100.00 lcontributic 83 181.00 a [all I It nw Pvace 833181st Street NYC I °- ~~~~~110 ..... ! vu. . reimbursed- pense 83 Oavid Grochulski 713 Humboldt StreetB:'weklyn,NY 1p141.00 s NYC 257.71 jists 83 1Board of Elec'.ions 131 Varick Street .135.00 contributic- 83 Irvington House Institute 1,150.00 postage f83 ]Postmaster G.P.O. 210.00 comp. list 83 Sophie Berkowitz 210.00 r83 Vernice Fowler /83 Florence Feinstein 210.00 1 /83 Rene Noona 240.00 240.00 /83 Tamy Martin 1

/83 Martha Rubin 180.00

/83 Geraldine Moses 1.210.00.

/83 Adolph Gross . 210.00

/83 Barbara Bruno 180.00 .... /83 Cynthia Adamick .. 240.00 DoreenBookum - 240.00 '/83 Louise Flores * .. 240.00 183.1 ...... -

:/83 John Vega 210.00.. __ '/83 Maria Velazquei 210.00

'/83 Patricia Tambakis 150.00 210.00 '/83 Jean Shevlin

13,609. 71 TOTAL OR BALANCE FORWARD

w~ ~ *9f-7v 'r . ~U prp k. A &A 4 4 Aa . 3,,. tj_ - # -- I %P " %1 -1 * v -- -- f -AdmL. bn4w. MR It ao . ------x

.,---f w w

orm SBE 4 pg. 1.(Rev. 5/78) STATE OF NEW YORK 0 BOARD OF ELECTIONS FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE STATEMENT -CANDIDATE OR POLITICAL COMMITTEE (see instructions on reverse side)

STEIN -'81 Identification Number (lull name of canoeoate or committe4) 144

60 East 42nd Street President Borough of Manhattan 40 "ice£ Poltcal SubdWV~sIon) New York, N.Y. 10165 Democrat ICSIy. sale. tp code INa e o Paty O Inowep1nt oy) Check if address has changed since last statement REPORT FOR ELECTION ON i i i (primary. eneral. speuloll

TYPE OF REPORT CHECK ONE: 0 Candidate itemized O Committee itemized 0 Candidate in-lieu-of O Committee in-lieu-of CHECK ONE: C 32-day pre- primary C 32-day pro- election January 15, 19.43.. C 11-day pre- primary 11-day pre- election 0 May 15, 19- il 27-day post-primary 27-day post-election 0 September 15, 19...

CHECK IF APPLICABLE: C Termination report Amendment to repor

VERIFICATION ITEMIZED IN-LIEU-OF Walter McCaffrey In&me)I e e ni e e Treasurer of the of the (Treasurer. Canaicate. other for (Tr~surer. Camme. oihefl Ir Stein '81 len %a"-e Of CO-mee or Otfce o DTaty postion) slate (Narm of commomte or office or party oiltion) sta that I At 1^e ,i8o0e1Maeion containao herein being mo hae not ecev nor expenre mone tan oneft nouO'1 ".548t tC Aotocie 14 of the Election Laiw is in all - OVS t'.ae to te bestof my knowledge, information olSlat m Connection wan ri cafmpios, C .) -t b*e480

/1 ~, *:ae loo*t) (signatlure) is.cra:uee t

ANY FALSE STATEMENT MADE IN THE WITHIN STATEMENT IS PUNISHABLE AS A CLASS A MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO SECTION 210.45 OF THE PENAL LAW.

o !.VgwpqTm-qg - I i FIT-, 114.R-qp, ' A .,Tw I-..

1. I 4 4w~-i

U"

4 Jah. 1978-pg.'4" SUMMARY PAGE a Section E - Allocation of Total Campaign Finances to Candidate(s) supported by this committee. (if candidate authorization or non-authorization has not been filed for each candidate sup- ported, such a statement must be filed with this report.) B. (1) Enter Line 32 column A on Line 54 column A; enter Line 32 column B on Line 54 column (2) List each of the candidates supported by this committee on Lines 34 thru 53. Column A. (3) Allocate Line 54 A to each of the candidates: enter amounts in Lines 34 through 53 B. (4) Allocate Line 54 B to each of.the candidates: enter amounts in Lines 34 thru 53 column

Accumulative Allocation of Campaign Finances to CWdda'.?: _ _ _, 0 , o CANDIDATE on PRIMARY ELECTION GENERAL OR SPEC., C) 5 (Column A) ELECTION (Columr: LAST NAME FIRST NAME amount cent momunt per

B.P.-MAN. STEIN ANDREW 1#187&427.80 100" ____

_ _ _ _ _I ______

______11

.... _____,II" I

A,....tns on triosIiine & line 32 l187 ,427. 4600%I I,Oc alp:glt "e the sane I I .I -L

d..

J.

..1 44P 4-0O46 8-4-

§BE 4-Jan. 1978-pg. 2 SUMMARY PAGE

S Candidate Statement: Complete Sections A, B, C, D. Do not Include In this statement receipts and expenditures which are included in a political committee report.

Committee Statement: Complete- Sections A, B, C, D, E.

Section A-RECEIPTS (this period): Primary Generaloor Election Special Election LINE NO.: (Column A) (Column B) S2699415.63Ls 1 Monetary Contributions Itemized (Schedule Al) 2 J Unitemized 3 Contributions other than money (Schedule A2) 4 Sub-total Contributions (add lines 1 through 3) s 269415.63 s S Refunds of Contributions (Schedule A3) 6 Total Contributions (subtract line 5 from line 4) S 269,415.63 S_ _ _ 7 Loans Received this period (Schedule A4) s s $ 269 5 . S. 8 Transfers In (Schedule A5) $__ _ _S_ _ _ 9 Other Receipts (Schedule A6) 10 Total of net receipts and contributions other than money s$ 269,415.63 $_...... (add lines 6 through 9)

Section B- DISBURSEMENTS (this period): 11 / Itemized (Schedule 81) s. 90,393.16 s.__ S 116.5 $Sqo ...... 12 Net campaign Disbursements Unitemized and Expenditures in-kind 13 (In support of one or more Expenditures In-Kind candidates) (Schedule A2) $ S- 14 Refund (Schedule 82) 15 (add lines 11 through 13 less Total 90,839.74 S line 14) 16 Non-campaign Disburse- (constituted and part) ments committee only) S. S_____ 17 Repayment of loans (Schedule 83) ~ 136,500.00 S 63,385.53 _ 46 Transfers Out (Schedule B4) 5* 199,885.53 ______19 Total Other Disbursements (add lines 16 through 18) 20 Total of net Disbursements and Expenditures in-kind (a d lines 15 and 1 S$ 290,725.27 -_-

.7 - Jan. 1978-pg.3 SUMMARY PAGE

ion C -Cash Balance ENO. (Columns A & B) Cash Balance at Beginning of this period (enter amount from previous report line 25 or If this is first report, 219324.75 enter zero) S , Total of Net Receipts and Contributions Other than Money this period (add line 10 columns A & B) $269,415.6 Total (add line 21 and 22) $ 290,740.38 Total of Net Disbursements and Expenditures In-kind this period (add line 20 columns A & B) -290, 725.27 . Cash Balance at End of this Period 15.11 (subtract line 24 from line 23) $

e:tion D- Campaign Financial Status Primary General or Sectlon Special (Cection (Column A) (olumn B)

26 Liabilities (excluding loans) Incurred THIS PERIOD which are still outstanding (Schedule Cl) $ S .? Liabilities (excluding loans) Outstanding from PREVIOUS PERIODS (liabilities line 28 of previous report less liabil- itie3 which have been paid; if first report enter zero) $ S $ !8 Total liabilities Outstanding (add lines 26 and 27) !9 Net Campaign Disbursements and Expenditures in-kind of previous re- "pontPREVIOUSLY or if this REPORTEDis first report (enter enter line zero) 31 S1, 096,588.06 $

0 Net Campaign Disbursements and Expenditures in-kind $ S THIS PERIOD (enter line 15) 90,839.74 MITotal Net Campaign Disbursements and Expenditures in-kind to date (add lines 29 and 30) $ 1.187,427.80 2 Total Net Campaign Disbursements and Expenditures in- kind to date and liabilities Outstanding (add lines 28 and 1,187,427,80 31) $

$ 366,500,00 $ 3 Total loans Outstanding

J... BE 4 Jan. 1978-pg. 5 MONETARY CONTRIBUTIONS SHEDULE I

USE CACON Al Identification Period P or G Control

E FULL NAME MAILING ADDRESS AMOUNt EIVED -3 ! • e

5,000.00 8/82 Sterling Equity " 1615 Northern Blvd., ManhassetNY 14/82 Jand 0 Realty 101 West 55th Street. New & r?, N.Y. 10.000.00

29/82 Builtland Partners 30 Rockefeller Plaza, New Ybo0,N.Y. 10,000.00 29/82 Solstead Associates 360 Park Avenue S. NYC 10022 10,000.00 Gerg len10?023 " 3 GeorgeKlein 115 Central Park West, New Yor0N.Y. 0,000.00

30/82 Sterling Equity 1615 N. Blvd. Manhasset- N.Y. 5,000.00

31/82 Harry Macklowe . 305 East 46th Street, New YorIO0Y. 5,000.00 West 45th Street, New YoOI.Y. 5,000.00 13/82M - inskoff Theatre 200 1564 Broadway New York, N.Y. • 5,000.00 13/82 - U.T. Associates

13/82 X Lunt Theatre Corp. 1564 Broadway, New York, N.Y. 5,000.00 5,000.00 13/82 X American Theatre Press Inc. 100 Sixth Avenue, New York, N.Y. Road, Kingpolnt, N.Y. 2,500.00 13/B8 Lee and Lizbeth Stevens 8 East 20/84 Builtland Partnets 30 Rockefeller Plaza, NYC 5,000.00

N.Y. 10475 3,500.00 20/8 X Morrisania Bus Service Inc. N.E. Thruway, Bronx, N.Y. 10475 1,500.00 20/82 X Edmin Realty Corp. N.E. Thruway, Bronx, N.Y. 10475 5,000.00 20/8 X Ferdinand Arrigoni, Inc N.E. Thruway, Bronx, 20/8 Delbert W. Coleman 111 EastChestnut Street, C I lo, Ill. 1,000.00

20/8 Sheldon Gordon 1801 Century Pk. East, Los Angeles,Ca. "0,000.00

21/8 xJL Arol Development Corp. 201 Bronx Terminal Market, ronx, N.Y. 5,000.00 21/8 Newton Glekel -- 680 Fifth Avenue, New York, N.Y.10019 25,000.30 23/82 Peter S, Kalikow 90 Park Avenue, New York, N.Y-lO0l6 5,000.00 East 45th Street New Yrks N.Y 5,00.00 23/82 K.T. ElghanayanBur 3091-,*Maisocvenue NYC 10022 10017 23182 Burt Abrams 2,0 1 5ad9soc5,000.00

23/B X 2 Broadly Company 245 Park Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10167 00 TOTAL OR BALANCE FORWARD

", PE", '

MWEI- IN" - -- a W- -00-. V BE 4 Jan. 1978pg. $ MONETARY CONTRIBUTIONS*SCHEDULE

)FFICIALTE c CACONo Al FULLIdentification Priod P orG Control USE CO NAME MAILING ADDRESS AMOUI., EIVED 06f

5,000.C" '23/82 X Maiden Lane Company 245 Park Avenue, New York, N.Y.10167 SuccessNY 11042 5,000.C: '23/82 Glick Development Affiliates 3000 Marcus Ave.,Lake _ I28/82Parvlz Yaghoubzadeh 475 Park Avenue South, New York, N., 1',000.C" NY 10017 5,000.c( 4/82 Alice Lawrence 870 U.N. Plaza,New York, New N.Y. 5,000.C(' '6/82 Seymour Cohen 100 William Street York, N.Y10025 1O00C, 12/82: Jayne McGrath 41 West 96th Street, Nei York, New York, N.Y. 10022 2,000.C" p12/82I 1 lKenpart Realty 900 Third Avenue, New York, N.Y10028 7,500.C" p12/82 I Bonnie&Steven Bauman 144 East 84th Street, '14821 George and Edna Daly 20 East 74th Street, New York,NY 10023. 7,500.C: 29000.C: f14/821 X Towpart Realty Corp. 909 Third Ave. New York, NY 10022 '14/82 Alexander&Joan Coleman 1 Gracie Terrace New York, N.Y. 10028 2,000.C" '14/82 Norman and Helen Elowitz 1500 Palisade Ave. Ft.Lee,NJ 07024 -5000c '14/82 Alex-Coleman 1 Gracde Terrace, New York, N.Y.10028 3,000.C: 412/82 x Taft Apartments, Inc. 909 Third Avenue, NYC 10022 2,000.C '15/82 Solstead Associates 360 Park Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10022 io,000.C: 7/82 Burt Abrams 598 Madison Ave. NYC 10022 10,000 .C: '2/82 Kenpart Realty 909 Third Avenue, NYC 10022 2,000.(2 10036 1,790.E 2/82 Nederlander I0. 208 West 41st Street NYC 8/82 X j Cub Stationers, Inc. 159 East 170th St, " Bronx, N.Y. 50. . /8/82 ITed Zeichner 620 East 20th Street, NYC .25.C 50. ?/8/8 Friends of Dick Gottfried 130 CPW NYC 10023

TOTAL OR BALANCE FORWARD 269r!15.63

..... ,.. .. L...... -J.... . L .. -- ...... -- ,--... -. - ,-t ...... :.-.' ' 0 0 .00 i"w SCHEDULE 82

FULL NAME

TOTAL

REPAYMENT OF LOANS SCHEDULE e: OF LOA MAILING ADDRESS AMOUNT DATE rE PAID FULL NAME 23,000.00 (82 Andrew Stein 8,000.00 182 Andrew Stein 32,500.00 182 Andrew Stein 66,000.00 /82 Andrew Stein 5,000.00 /82 Andrew Stein

/82 Andrew Stein_2,000.00 TOTAL 136,500.00

TRANSFERS OUT SCH4EDULE B4 CA icial TRO Al Identification Period PorG I CO ___9--- MAIUNG ADDRESS AMOUNT TE.PAID I FULL NAME 100.00 2/82 Friends Of Bob Dryfoos. 2/82 IComittee to Elect Nadler c/o/Goldsteln.131 East 96th St NYC 150.00 0/82 Friends of Eliot Engel Post Office Box 74, Bronx, N.Y. 750.00 500.00' 1182JCoTnittee to Elect Robert Rodriguez 203 East 116th St. NYC 10029 100.00 7/82 Community Free Democrats 320 Central Park Wbst, NYC 10024 /82 New Democratic Club 224 East 47th Street NYC 10017 20.00 /8? INew 'Way Democratic Club 75.00 5!82 McCall Campaign '82 c/o Fife 25 CPW NYC 10023 500.00 500.00 -/'2 Committee to-Elect Gadsen 366 St. Nicholas Avenue NYC NYC 10036 .90.00 4 jG.L.I.D. .. 225 West 48th Street

10023 O. 00 1 / Friends of Dirk nt+fri 1 a.e!.t. 7'?no trppt NYC -''-) Committee to Elect Rose Dubinsky 2 First Avenue NYC 575.00 t , • , , . , . , -- 0• • ~j .- ~ rj

E 4 Jan.1978-pg.9 DIFIINflSOF rCISBURSEMENTS SCHEDULE 8. LIF~w %Waw. %09Wv~wbwo. . %f r' m A~t'i#u5', MAILING ADDRESS AMVUIV I ATE FULL NAME REFUNDE:

0

. 'I I I " ! 2w-

-1 TOTAL

REPAYMENT OF LOANS SCHEDULE____ FULL NAME MAILING ADDRESS AMOUNT CEDL A PAID _

TOTAL

TRANSFERS OUT SCI4EOULE" cCA CA TRO Al Identification Period P or G *' CO _MAILINGADDRESSAMOUNT TE PAID I FULL NAME MAILING ADDRESS AMOUNT NYC 10011 50.0 '/8/82 IChelsea Reform Democratic Club 249 West 23rd Street. /21/82 Sterling " _26,500.00 1/22/82 28,714:44

/18/82 _2,366.65 /2/82 __- _ 2,044.44

/10/83 Democratic Association 178 Hester Street. NYC .. .Isom

I "1

TOTAL 63,385.53

1A 7 IF. - . 4L 'r O - 00A:

SCHEDULE 81 E4 Jan. 197S-pg. DISBURSEMENTS MAILING ADDRESS AMOUNT DISBURSEME PD FULL NAME

10,000.00 Media 8/82 D.H. Sawyer &Associates Ltd 60 West 55th Street NYC 9/22/82 10,000.00 Media 10/14/82 20,000.00 Media 11/15/82 10,000.00 Media

12/8/82 10,000.00 Media

NYC 10001 614.56 Pridting p7/82 Clark & Fritz_ 229 West 28th Street, NYC 1,000.00 Printing p30/82 Zale Koff Graphics 435 Hudson Street p28/82 C.T.F. Printing 150 Varick Street, NYC 351.81 Printing Personal p7/82 Gail Parie 40 West 96th Street, NYC 10025 350.00 Services 1,928.60 Transportation 7/82 Avis'Car Rental 1775 Broadway, NYC 7/21/82 2,007.00 Transportation

10016 299.00 Transportation (7/82 Parking Violation Bureau P.O.Box 2135, NYC 10023 750.00 Transportation 01ins Rent a Car 202 West 76th Street, NYC Advertising I30/82 Hagedorn 235 Park Ave. So., NYC 150.00 N.Y. 600.00 Advertising p14/82 Jewish Press 388 Third Ave.,Brooklyn, 224.70 Advertisirg 2/15/82 Enlightenment Press 56 West 22nd Street, NYC 10010 8,437.50 Theatre! .:J9/82 46th Street Theatre

9/22/82 David Tarlow & Co. 60 East 42nd St.,NYC 10017 3,500.00 Accounting 422.00 Phones 0/6/82 U.F.T. 260 Park Avenue South, NYC 0/6/82 Post Office G.P.O. NYC 10001 500.00 Stamps 162.50 Contribution 7/30/82 N.Y.C.C.S.R.E.A.

7/30/82 Farley Fund 50.00 Contribution

9/16/82 N.A.A.C.P. 100.00 Contribution

..9'-L Human Rights Campaign 300.00 Contribution

0/29/82 Uptown Chamber of Commerce 310 Lenox Avenue, NYC 100.00 Contribution Contribution 1/8/82 100 Black Men 1515 Broadway, NYC 10036 125.00 1/17/82 St Nicholas Pk Civic Assoc 1 Convent Avenue, NYC 10027 118.00 Contribution S.00 Contrfbption 1/22/82 City Meals on-Wheels TOTAL OR BALANCE FORWARD

.. . " -hX ...... --

ta. !O 6ASI

DISBURSEMENTS SCHEDULE 81 4 Jan. 1976-pg.S-- PIURPO SE OF PAID FULL NAME MAIUNG ADDRESS AMOUNT DISBURSEMEt

/22/8 Mary Manning Walsh HomeI 50.00 Contributiom NYC 150.00 Personal /12/8 Elaine Parker 2311 23S th Avenue 1A e u ,, YCSer'vices /15/8 Keith Francis Caters 78 West 120th Street, NYC 10027 350.00 Reception /15/8 Board of Elections Varick Street, NYC 255.00 Books

/29/8A Stanley Pinsley 317 West 82nd Street NYC 500.00 Media

7/82 Our Town li51 Second Avenue, NYC ,500.00 Advertising 11/23/82 1,547.49 vertising .500.00 Advertising

15/82 Cash 400.00 Stamps

e|

. TOTAL OR BALANCE FORWARD $900393.16

-W -- -. -r - -Z,.-j ,-;- 'Best mom contest is now underway , Delman Shoes, 233 First Ave., Cae Del Prado. iB Z. " Wub T&V's annual "Mother of Park Avenue 3wuth. New STYLNG. 10003 AUentries at 14 St.. 45 PERM OR St. (lol-2nd); the Year" contest isnit's se- York, N.Y. SHAMPOO & SET. F f rea include the names. ad- BODY WAVE & RESTYL- CUT.. cond week, and entries are must Stylists. Chaz-Vito Hairstylst , M best, dresses and phone numbers ING. Mark's Hair a pouring in from local DISH Second Ave (23 St.); $10 Stating this week pest, she of both the writer and his or 334 lit Ave.. at i St, will she's never been a Flowers by GIFT CERTIFICATE. lucky area resident good care of me. on this her nominee for "Mother of GARDEN. have a chance to win 13. takes Twilight. 354 East 20h St. Gramercy Pharmacy. 343 we all agree" rhymes eight- the Year A you need is yor Social the many priesto (r. 1st Ave.); GE. FistAve. (0St.);,$10OGIFT year-old Rachel Passaretti. Among CERTIFICATE. M.H. secrtymer. is he awarded to the winning AUTOMATIC CITRUS win 2S 510 East 20th Street. May 4 Hardware. Lamston, Inc.. 275 TIrdAve. Even if you don't all entries. mother are these gifts. JUICER, Vercesi a chance to the deadline for 23rd St. ulam-3rd t2l132 St.); 9PIECE FAMI- you tMill ave winning mother will be donated by local merchants: 152 Ea* -one The BRUNCH FOR TWO. LY DINNER. Repss b kewsoT&V'sat In T&V just prior 2 HOT KOSHER BARB- Avel. month's freeMren It'se- announced P. J. Reynods Restaurant. F16rstAve.atl13h St.; $10 to Mother's Day QUED CHICKENS .Zoky's citing game. For details 10 rd Ave. 2 Second Ave.. (0h St.); GIFT CERIFiCATE. n order to enter the con- Delicatessen, Park FlowerShop. e pages0 and 21. (3617 St.); 80 GIFT CER- COMPLT LUNCH FOR Gramercy test, write in 200wordsorless Frank's Trattorla, 347 X0OThird Ave .cor 21st St); consider your Mom TIFICATE. Bloom A Krup. TWO. "why you First Ave (0-21 St ); DIN- 00 GIFT CERTIFICATE. to be the best" Send all let- 206First Ave. (12-3St I*110 ters to Town & Village. 235 GIFT CERTIFICATE. H NER ENTREES FOR TWO. Continuedon Page 16 Own a.ViIIcgeE VOL. 37, NO. 21 NEW YORK, NEW YORK. APRIL 19. 1984 25 CENTS SPECIAL REPORT Stein Election Group May Have Violated Federal Law high with one family giving the Stein fund about millionThe i191 campaign did not cost Stein anything as a former employeeof any Manhattan Borough President Andrew Stein's S10.00. Nathan H. Mager. he has beenirepaid by the campaignborrowed fund 5.000 for in 'at (the year he father. Jerry Finkelstein. gave 133.000 his money that he expended. Stein campaign committee called stein Stein's and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Borough President) may have violated daughter. Alison R. Magr. contributed 31.50. July. 191. from was elected 12.500 Other at 1percent over a commercial rate loan. Federal election laws in the past year as it collected his son. Peter Mager, chipped In with Company repaid 5300.000 to wealthy realtors and corpora- Stein was paid back S%6.077 from his campaign over S500,000 in contributions, contributions, mostly The extra as if Stein were running for amounts (see lists inside). None of fund, although he had only put in S20,000 Stein, and spent $140,000 tions gave huge costs. The seat in the 15th CD. which en- are deductible expenses ac- $42.077, his lawyer says, is interest the congressional the contributions of the firm of Skadden. the area. cording to the Internal Revenue Service. lawyer, Thomas J. Schwarz compasses to Flom. 913Third Avenue. law limits individual contribu- Stein denies that any money collected was used Arps, Slate. Meagher, & Federal election his a leading election law campaigns to $1000 per further his congressional ambitions, although who is reputed to be tions to congressional and a major not all of the loan 530.ooW) or general election. Corporations disbursements during the period reads like specialist, said, "Since primary Once a from Manufacturers to Mr. Stein was further loan- union contributions are strictly prohibited campaign. fund) not all under Federal law, he of- consultant during Stein's race for ed by Mr. Stein to Stein '8 (campaign person spends over $5000 A media would be reimbursed by a candidate. Borough President in 1981 was paid a whopping of the interest on the loan ficially becomes Sawyer. '81 to Mr. Stein." committee has both received $146,000. The same media consultant. D. Stein Stein's campaign In would not permit this over the $1,000 federal limita- was paid in the last year 40.000 besides 560,000 Stein and his lawyer many contributions a was for to talk to Manufacturers about any spent in excess of the $5,000 to become 1982. Stein claims that the payment In 1962 newspaper tion and organiz- campaign back In of the loan and whether the loan and interest The Stein committee is, though, disputed bill left over from his aspect per- candidate for contribu- David Dinkens was repaid and who may have guaranteed the ed under state law where no limitation 1961 for Borough President against by Town & defeated after spending over $1 sonal loan for Stein. Three requests tions exists. who he narrowly rejected. Stein said there in the last year extraordinarily Village were made and The contributions no guarantors who would be responsible if he were policy did not pay back Manufacturers It is bank financial dealings of a customer osT WfDNFSDAY APRIt 18, 194 notto discuss Continuefd on PaRe 32

STEIN TO RUN FOR

MANiATTIAN WirfAiKh F'r-d,.ntr ft .tr Awlrr- )j4-jjj has de, i d y ,hd~it.A'k ito 5 5 runri'.l ,irn f,,rt. it-v (,jj1gj14.Slifig. se' S ,rid. ciigd in thi.iigh'- M tllh't.4t1 C O M OE

f., ivl ' u,,dt,, m Ak C . FrI .iend,i ta,""Si-tn '- t

ISobrfr t hkog hfo plh, .,vdh!:II to*,D I hi resstinthet1;thtrdkisrc i* s ,,l,S W t1h14m I

"A se( .nd l,1 -01 tako-vi. e,(I .v . )t14 agreerd Ihis was I right thing ((,do reported in its Wednesday edition that Manh net Wl The New York Post

week period of set,cond 0 .. . President Andrew Stein had ended a two • 4: mer aideBorough for Con- . to officially enter the Democratic primary Sob thoughts and decided or gress in the 15th district. the race - ,- ifinally,4 tr ,,i. decidedithin striking to make distan The Post reported...._ "Friends ....said Stein ice of

afterincumbent taking Republican a poll that Williamshowe S.nim Green. uuu uu, .. .. Brough President Andrew Stein 3 -TOWN & VILLAGE - THURSDAY. APRIL 19,19M4 Stein Election Group May Have Violated Federal Law Continued from Page I contest each other. The decisive vote is usually with housing complexes in the Coney Island section of without permission of the individual Involved. the other three members of the Board of Estimate. Brooklyn. And Gliedman was no newcomer to In June, 1981, the Sterling National Bank and Besides his Board of Estimate vote and Issuing pro- politics. He knew, as well, the considerable Trust Company. 540 Madison Avenue, lent Stein's clamations, the Borough President has little to do. generosity of the Trumps when campaign- campaign $220,000 that was guaranteed by ten men However, he can help in tax-exemptions and using contribution time came aro, 1. including Donald Trump. Edward R Downe, Jerry his position to get a friendly hearing. "When Trump's 421-A application was filed, there Finkelstein, Michael Forrest, Sylvan Lawrence. Mayor Koch in his book "Mayor" tells how Stein was soon a call from Manhattan Borough Presi- Arthur Emil, Steven Greenberg, Saul P. Steinberg, sought to aid Donald Trump with a tax-exemption dent, Andrew Stein. Stein had. earlier, been the sub- Irving Fingeritt, and Sherman Cohen. In addition, with Trump Tower. ject of damaging news stories as a result of his ac- most of these men contributed heavily In cash. The Mayor said: cepting the use of a sumptuous summer house in the Trump and his real estate .corporations con- *"On acquiring the 56th Street property, the Hamptons free of charge from another Manhattan tributed $24,000; Saul Steinberg. $30.000 and Emil younger Trump announced a project commen- real estate baron, Sylvan Lawrence. In that call $7500. Emil just last week bought the former Police surate even with his own ambition. The Trump Stein arranged a meeting with Trump to which he Headquarters on Centre Street. Organization, he said. would raze the nine-story invited Tony Gliedman to dicuss the 421-A exemp- Although Stein says that he Is vehemently anti- Bonwit Teller Building. a great favorite of Art Deco tion on the Bonwit Teller site." landlord, he has sought and obtained extremely aficionados, and construct in its place a sixty-eight- Although Stein tried to help, Trump was turned large contributions from many real estate story steel-and-glass tower containing 33 con- down. The matter is still the subject of litigation. magnates in Manhattan. One real estate man, who dominium units and vast areas for commercial use At a meeting last Friday with Stein and his elec- did not give to the Stein campaign who wanted to re- on the lower floors. To be called "The Trump tion lawyer. Schwartz, in the borough president's main anonymous, said, 'Sure, he is disliked by the Tower," it would cost. he said, $155 million to build. Municipal Building office, Stein was asked to ex- smaller real estate apartment owners who are lock- The $407,000 one-bedroom condos and the Trump plain what services were rendered by Eiection ed In, but the moguls got out of rent-control years Tower's jewel, its S3.15-million triplex, would both Computer Services and a firm, called O.S.L. both of ago Now, they want tax easements; city favors on be ready for occupancy in late !M2 For this Donald which were paid a total of $7,000 in October. 133, zoning and whatever a vote on the Board of Trump wanted an estimated 530-40-million tax ex- and January, 1964. Stein and his lawyer declined to Estimate is worth." emption under the Section 421-A program. reveal what services were performed. Each Borough President has one vote on the "Anthony Gliedman was my Commissioner for Margo Marabon, the owner of Election Computer Board of Estimate making five votes. The Mayor, Housing Preservation and Development. Glied- Services and O.S.1., 575 Lexington Avenue, refused the Comptroller, and the City Council President has man, like Trump, had his roots in Brooklyn. He to answer questions relating to her work for the two each. Each Borough President for the most knew the Trump Organization from its gigantic Stein campaign committee. She did confirm that part goes along with a "home-rule vote" and do not Trump-Warbasse and Trump Village subsidized Continued on Page 33 WE r MoM

$20 GIFT CERTIFICATE FOR FILM PROCESSING (110. 126. 135 FILM) MOTHER OF THE YEAR FROM 366 3rdClassicol Cassette Topes.- Open 7 Days r h theis .*h , a* ttenni 5usi.,t_ PHOTOMART INTERNATIONAL ___26-27Ave. 1_.. St.) 696-3783S Work eta prelsslen l. Fsrenge CORPI Fdkrf.nt T..im..1a P"h.. FNis DOnORSt. "IW Complete Selecion Poperbock AHardbock Books A 2361. t n Ave.) -WA2. ~2d 6999 320 East 23rd St. G.E. AUTOMATIC CITRUS JUICER I7732, m MOTHER OFFOE THE YEAR STYLING, CUT, SIIAMPO0O& SET $10 GIFT CERTIFICATE VERCESI HARDWARE FOR Plumbing. MOTHER OF s Toee•ouseuwares H Tp NI0E * App*lasceg THE YEAR MOTHER OF THE YEAR IEleresical Suppliee * GE 3hho * Teels Buk~ieri., * Jlae l.a 5Esr 23rd St.La.Suplle -3rdAe.) •loeo GIR5-1* Pule CHAZ-VITO HAIRSTYLISTS 3hdAvc(22-23Se) 473-233 M.H. LAMSTON, INC. "2MaST FrdAe1-29.) 777-141g0 37T FUON lrdn Ave. (33-33 S.) 7-404o W. U DINNER ENTREES FOR TWO $10 GIFT CERTIFICATE MOTHER OFFrOR THE YEAR FOR $1 0GIFT CERTIFICATE MOTHER FOl CAFE DEL PRADO OF THE YEAR MOTHER FROM OF THE YEAR GRAMERCY PHARMACY 312 Eas 23r .(8.14 H DELMAI N SHOES I 32ve26W- I 343 2331 st Ave. att14 St. AL 4-4896 ItAve.(I$ S 777

WITH TV SOUND. (40 BRUNCN FOR TWO VALUE) s20 GIFT CERTIFICATE MOTHER MOTHER (MIFRTE YEAR OF THE YEAR MOTHER OF THE YEAR OERTO HOUSEWARES Wd I YWHE~b BLOOM &KRP RESTAURANT SaUVIO P12 9 l9 359 2nd Ave. (21 St.)- 4 . 206 let Avo.(12-13 St.) 673-2 TOWN & VILLAGE - THURSDAY, APRIL 19.1904: 33

me imae rnmd Seniors ea-Olaitiy elderly Continued from Pape 4 96 MesnSIMe of Ar. Stein Election Group May See eueerage miseriiy elder pIuum is W " Amingq S e - of Ide ar arey - Md wha seedy his k ievpme faeler iir them - Sae Amdrus Feemdatieo fthe vime denfl Iverisnrley Americig Asseeseleg if Have Violated Federal Law Retirei PeimfImhas jost The Aairue Femaistieg awargiaa reearch r Was heaedin Is31by to Continued from Page 32 ie retenmt of So- MARP so pre=@* emegreb The Stein campaign committee recently spent elegy. Aashrepelsgy Mi im t & f SOW.ag.Sinee her companies specialized in voting lists. Election $2W,350 for postage and $14,000 in printing to mal Geremelgy a e UWve- lbt isepleg, telonda. Computer Services is well-known among politicians material to voters. Stein declined to reveal the con- sy of A rm sae, Ln who use mailing lists and lists of voters for cam- tent of all the mailings, to which voters were the IbeL mee-p ais inU solve- paigns. mailings made, and in what areas. Stein did supply Researchers will be d an Ies Mis.~W I In January , 1963, the Stein .*1 Committee filed one mailing concernlngA.T.& T. sed i a obdo eeme with the State Board of Elections a financial Listed on the January 15. 194. filing of Stein '$I mi effeliveges of A" Us" WO disclosure statement which said that It had no Committee was an expense to the Board of Elec- liabilities. However. Stein admitted that it owed tions, 131 Varick Street. for $27.71 for voter lists. 10,000 to a media consultant, D. Sawyer and that The Board of Elections gell voter lists at $7per thou- since the bill was in dispute it was not listed as a sand on a cash basis. Patricia Cortez of the Boar of liability. Sawyer was paid the $60,000 by Stein '81. KEEP IN THE KNOW. Elections says there were two purchases: one in SUBSCRIBE A veteran politician expressed amazement that May and one in July. Each time, she was told that it TO TOWN &VILLAGE the Stein '81 was still collecting huge amounts of was for the Borough President's office and that she LESS THAN 10' A WEEKI money nearly three years after Stein was elected should send a bill. "They didn't pay the bill on YES-SEND Borough President and that soliciting was being time" she says. "'ittook until December 14. 1983 un- ME T&V 1 done to pay off Stein and at the same time that UIlStein '81 paid the bill - six and eight months 11 1 YEAR - ( 52 WEEKS) FOR $5. money was being spent in huge sums. late." Stein was asked by Town & Village what 23 per- Stein said that the lists purchased were for all - 2 YEARS - (104 WEEKS) FOR $9. ' sons listed on the filings had done to earn salaries of over Manhattan. Cortez disagrees and remembers 0l 3 YEARS - (156 WEEKS) FOR $12. ! $210 each which was paid a few months So. Mail- that "the lists were for downtown." The number of ing addresses are supposed to be listed, but there names was 3,00. ZIP CODES 10009; 10010: 10003; 10016 ! were none. Stein said. "I have no idea what they Lawrence Hailoran, an attorney, yesterday said ELSEWHERE PLEASE ADD $5 TO ABOVE ! did." that '7M Federal law say that anybody who NAME: , Town & Village located Jean Shevlin of S Stuyve- spends more than $mI to iuence a ederal ec- sant Oval, one of the women named on the list who tion has to file with the Federal Election Commis- CITY: earned $210. She said that she had checked Board of sion and explain where the money came from." Election lists for persons who had voted in certain Town & Village has printed the federal filings STATE, zIP: years. She refused to elaborate. Stein refused to from Congressman William Green, Republican in- MAIL TO: TOWN A VILLAGE provide the addresses and phone numbers of the re- cumbent, and Betty Lall. candidate for the CIRCULATION DEPT. i maining names. Democrat nomination. 235 PARK AVE.. SO. I t N.Y.. N.Y. 10003 j gifts shell adom

9 Piece Family Dinner for ToWI uf-AL -kUEIUOlE SMALL PZZA PI Mother of the Year from EM.A. Segya REGO'S ROOST "lEVlRafHIN O1 A SAOIL Dlecous Fried Chicken & Seafood 39Iwt Ave. (ea.lls 5i.) 366-2962 Free Prompt Delivery 2-5 First Ave. at I Sth St. 533-5240

'I U M- $20 GIFT CERTIFICATE $10 GIFT C.rlTIFICATE $20 GIFT CERTIFICATE FOR DINNER FOR TWO MOTHER OFFOR THE YEAR Plus Our Special Bottle of Italian Wine MOTHER OF THE YEAR MOTHER OF THE YEAR PROM FROM ENESLOW COMFORT SHOES LA STRADA EAST RESTAURANT 296 First Avenue Phone: 777-07 Lr4 3rd Ave. (2122 St.) 473-3760 3"9First Ave. at 19 St.- 477-2300j ONE" I I BRUNCH FOR TWO 2HOT KOSHER IARIECUEDCHICKENS FOR DISH GARDEN MOTHER OF THE YEAR F4ROM MOTHEROFTHE YEAR MOTHER OF THE YEAR FROM ZOOKY'S DELICATESSEN Flowers ByTwilight FINEST KOSHER PROVISIONS FLOWERS0OR ALL OCCAGONS WIREDANY lot 5 RESTAURANT HOT BAGELSMADE BEFORE YOUR EYES 354 East 20th St. (nr. twt Ave.) GR 5-7066 ,4.02nd Ave. (20th St.I 473-9703 180 3rd Ave. (16-17 St.) 982-469" i 14rPAA -I $4500 Porm or Body Wave 1 Restyllng COMPLETE LUNCH FOR TWO . $10 GIFT CERTIFICATE FmR MOTHER OF THE YEAR MARK'S MOTHER OFTHE YEAR COMlPtiNTS OP

1 Gramercy Park Flower Shop HAIR STYLISTS uuSt FRANK'S TRATTORIA Sakm Bothers Out80 Vew "WO Talk To You About Your Hair" 347 lUAve. (20-21 St.) 677-2"91 Au ema CAsOS NOSSOUD 260 Third Ave. (car. 21st St.) Gt S-4W 334 1StAve.at 19th St. 477-2354 Woman, 92, calls Times harmful to her health. Am Yourell, Ui of Stkyve "suffered serious juris." Now be Is loaly I .4nJ" MS sin Town thiaks Tm & The April 26. IM edlon of especiated, he sad.The berllnetgIfey VUi Is a grest newspaper the Sunday Times was out-mliIon-dollar suit also names baaedle" $2.5 Winner A rligious wonmnshe has with dn average thilcknes of de her apartment door and as defendants her landord, attnd Immala CO D- S )5 W n e U each week But, whm heeopened er door in So pages Metopolitan Ue .and Mnt- ception church roollarly but don't mention the Sunday the morning she triped ee diell's World inest nw fInds It dfflca to t TInuM weeks winnn -I New York Thmto her which It M inured hr b ¢Cap,Newspa Delivery s- 18umaber is W2.l4SwSe weighs in at about five sad her lawyer Roart Den vi Cerp., whos loyee mM Very OWLert, keit POW 3IMMauid fot"howyou Row. 0 pounds with a few hunidred ba, SPark left the paper her ssmewhatof a PhOO pher 1010CODwin Illawmweekly z plus p"es. As a matter of As a result of the injury, md yesterday spouted these Priz ad a top prize of Ote fact she is suIng the NYT for Dla siUl,Miss Yourell epigrams: nimoeh'sfree rent a flat $I million because he bad to use a walker. Asked Yourel, who has lived In On nelitbors: "Everybody claims that it has been hazar- bow long die will have to me Stuyvesant Town for 3S years is as friendly as you permit dous to her health the walker, die said "I don't says that STis "one of the 01001010.'", Nowkly 7 ,,ught The U2-year-olid woman who know, b.u It fels like mos wmiderM places On raio: "lre Is no £-EV Mucceswof revoutjon lives alone at 47 ast 14th anybody could live." She was m %mdoes nm need te Puts m n tome t hrobes of Street said In onr papers on Ldst October. she fell and bornIn New York City and at- blessint of or Lord." - te tyranti thas deposed "" Monday that a "copy of the broke her hip because he tended school at St Gabriel's On anmoty: "It never - BARBARA TUCHM.AN New York Tnes newspaper" couldn't walk properly. the Church on 35th Street at Se- pays to be angry at anyone caused her to fall and thai she lawyer said. cond Avenue She describes Please turn to Page S iIIcage~ Uni, lcowilVLI.IIU.L27 On 92 -1' av TUL. 31. RU. ZJ NEW YORK, NEW YORK, MAY 3, 1984 25 ENS I Stein lies about bank loan Andrew Stein. Boraulgh President of Manhattan. who Hanover.permlssion theto Manufacturersbank's policy paymentstws Hanover were Noindiated leePt has bee testlIng the waters was not to discu details of etlh ued amew to a en whether to enter a aiy personal loan least $lo.00 Democratic primary for a The loan was revealed in to run for Cngres. ro & VHIf W e Stem chance th filing of State Eletion in a Manufactgutg yesterday sald throuh a Board forms which rep e anover toive ThY fuAl spokesman that he will not thI Stein had lout his cam. loan Ti" .00 duaClsureof the live mutany furt1hr Informa paan committee 6 Was at fIst refus4 ad then tion en a personal loan which Stetn's lawyer admitted that stein Ad e aher mo w m m eaceeded SM4,@ frm Sten had borowe In ecess bat te b oa. ma m 4MI He iubitted Manufactoms HHanover of this amount woatd biviiii doJbs Trum Campony He and his cancelled cheeks pewit thMgil per'. father. Jerry plabeuI. a Ssmfitad v anmthe mmovto wealthy In trtallst soid city te stein '51 campaign Com- ThIM & U4W yesterday s 4 , twld Temn& esf8 ep lcmw mpesana aoIsto W IeO VVmt. vsM uM V~uiwoi f they gave VWMe WW1o A ve nu e. t i 1 e e111 b m10 - ed tom &eeCt e bMdMto s1 CampaW emmittee. GeorgeMdlae. vice Prf- dent m charge of Operatano saId thai t was th p6acy of Stein no-show Mamafacturet h$reveal al details of any loan with a 1t- ier of auitorawitmon from tie b eower When told th0t T&V ndersood that Ih at Dem. club bank would not do -0Millner said. "It doesn't make sese knywhere where peple may As long as everything is em In the first real test of LtheaWask him about his campaign the upand-up'" Democratic Congressional atinancing' D)ouglas said that primary race. Betty Lall fIStein prefers "to retreat to but S T&V also called Manutac. made the best showing he tube." a reference to the turer's main office and spoke none of the candidates came t expensive media campaign inthe loan e to Giovanni Perez out the clear winner. tein is expected to wage if he department of the bank "Of President Andrew Sannounces it's typical An- he said. "we will hiBorough to an- A course," Stein. who has yet dy. he can't face the ques- everything to a third disap- reveal nounce his candidacy, Lions and he can't deal with a party if we get authonzatiOn pointed supporters by failing1Icrowd," Douglas added of a loan'" as c to disclose details to show up at the meeting Marty McLtaughlin, a "'We will not. had told them he would He said. W'l-[Uhe spokesman for Stein who was however. disclose anything The Mid Manhattan New atLere to observe, denied that without pernission from the Club. the first t Stein had ever planned to T4 hIs-mocratic club inthe ISth('(ngres.onal borrower - come to the meeting it's Stein apparently is in hot District ,, hold an 'ndomre just not right to seek an en- ment meeti', voted Monday Please turn to Page 10 will be celebrating her first birth- Please turn to Page 5 LITTLE SWINGER: Moriana Trilla, who neutral inthe in lost Thursday's nght to remain gets a push from Anne Messenger doy on May 12th. 7. primary The two declared In Stuy Town. See story on page Lall and sunshine at playground no. candidates. Betty Bob Tembeckjlian, tried to sell their political wares to ) the one hundred club members gthered at:] Editori Green: 'Post woefully inaccurate Cast 45th Street off First but neitherone was m ableAvenue. to amass the majority the club's en- What's the Truth, Andy? was relayed Bill's statement that needed to win "Woefully inaccurate" was Another inaccuracy claims that Green the $105 million claim was dorsement The reluctance of Andrew Stein to make full the description by Rep Bill the Post Mary Stumpf. in a last an investor In two 'absurd' and recommended disclosure of his campaign committee's finances and Green of the N Y Postfarticle was minute plea for Stein,urgd hotels. Green was that they check the facts with only add up to one thing: There is claiming that creditors of in- specified Stein supporters to vote no Its expenses in either. The one of the lawyers, giving the vestor Justin Colinwere seek- not an investor Stumpf. who is something very wrong Stein's fatl'er. Jerry Finkels- two con- name of the firm Obviously, endorsement ing $105 million frr.r Mr. story also contained district leader. tein. has gone almost berserk in his attempt to sup- One, that was not done. I do not the senior Green and other n-m:acrs of tradictory statements had taken her Stein and Finkelstein ca:l Itsa staff know who the sources were said that Stein press our investigation. - ,t ors of that calls to Green's his family. "No story, but the and members of his own staff "hatchet Job" (whatever that means) which is their that went unanswered, the second for this Colin have sug.>*ited have been by surprise when he failed at terminology for anything that might bPembarrassing- that Roden spoke to the Post reporters may anyone In my tamily is As a the last minute to appear."I It when the Village Vokceran but could not reach Green misled by someone. Six years ago. Stein used responsible for Colin's I unders- spoke with him In the after- "The paper called at about former reporter. about his using his office as debt," said the Con- butnoonbefore the.metn& and a disparaging story Rodensaid, "andI tand deadline pressures, orough President to aid large real estate c n- gresaman. "and the dollar 6:00p.m." he had all intmtions of com- that Bill was facts need to he checked out," lent him a a anmptifms figures are absurd." explained ini." the said. She wasn't trbutors. One realtor even Washington to Roden said. "The story has the facts enroute from sure why he backed out.but sumnmer home In Sotthhanpfl torfree. and that I would The Post article said: "Bill turned inside-out" said New York "he wouldn't have put And this week, we were told that Manilfactures I called them Greenisembrolledinamulti- added Greens aide, Hank Roden. call them back. in situation on pur- not to discuss any loan sIth third later million doliar bankruptcy me that" Hanover policy was Green family lost again about a half hour could costhim and 00§e "The them he was not yet case that parties, even with approval from the borrower. Stein's as a resul of Colin's and told Lall's cam- monev his family a cool $105million, Larry Douglas. loan from the bank is very questionable; interest the' are among home and I would call later is a'!vi'ties and to federal court paign manager, said 'Stein Please turn to Page 4 seeking When I reached Hill, I called according to compete a group of creditors I.. ... w...... I ...... pop n afraid to have legal redress' the Post tce imore s t'leasetun to rate iu I- TOWN &VILLAGE -THURSDAY. MAY 3, 11S4

spends nw un IWOMANb abo-o his Loan Federal law, he officially djisused th bome a candidate. pnod readsk&e a MoW ANDY STEIN CLAMS UP cofuslmd from Pal I Stan's campain commit- campig. ha both received many Jir r stein stein's water in reference inhis gt- We fate, MS thmtend edi money from corimti over the $1.0 LOG Ung beck more lmMation and pS and pghulshe. (1mr16'G. • TELEPHONE his campaign Committee. Ihders HagedoMeum- ad in His in excess of the 8S,0 to expeed. Left word to cd Sten -,1hanhe put The Tomn& Vl .aifT&V dI't THURSDAY. April 26 at 2:45 p.m. - Not In. Not lawyer sam It was for In- become a candidate. re anmakepslee. Stai's Stin commMe iI. Um Town& Vig. tfrest. However. runnd e st aM figes"show that noInterest4 hr em- payments had ever been wherenoI lluMs Green FRIDAY. April 27 at 104O.m.--Uptown at meting.-Wil WIh Nhm mN Towns made to Manufacturers tributionsesis CsntmedfnmPUPi refiud to the ONbUM in the Viag. Tut. Stein bi yar were eMstraordhsi- answer my qiuImons about l q interest payments. ly l guwItneflsn cu ebtainedbyI ll MAONDAy. April 0at 3:15p.m. -N ot inoffice. Stein's campaign commit- the Stein fund abot 8141,41. Post. tee called Stein 'I (the year Nathanf. Muger, a farmer lbs case invlvs me -olinOTl tocall his publicreatosm. employe of Stein's father. ullps f Colin. Mchltin TUESDAY. M Oy1 at 1:45 p.m. -'o .T he was elected Boough pinkeliein.ve Mrtin Maughlin. Presient) may haveviolated Jerry Co.. te Wa l Su the ,.m; his digide, Alimon brokerae firm eatnled by Federal election laws In contribud ClledRManMcaf ughOn. Told t Stain past year as It collected over t. Maw, ker aid entrpew suIm, and his aonPetW JIUn Colin, estraned i TUESDAY. My at 3:45 p.m. mignfineioms. 8si00 in contributions. onontool repaid 00. to Stein, and Mager. chippedIn with band of OIs slst Cyn- would natonswerenyfurthorquest la. .other contributlens. this. spent140.000 as If Stein were tat runing for the congeseional Mostly wealhyr"orsan "Creditors claim corpoations gave hue sat in the ItiCD.whichen- uu i d. Green, the liberal Mal"At compasses the area agmounts (M Rpba,"-d" ;ame iNone of the contributions are were effectively full paSenrs"Andy Stein using Federal election law limits deductible expene m c- in Colin's hl wicI in Individual contributions to Internal congressional campaigns to cording to the chide two now defunct West $1000 per primary or general levenueService. and Stein denie that any were Colin'spat. hatchetjob' line election Corporations strict- money collected was used W union contributions are congressional am- would mean that they would ly prohibited Once a persOn further his have to sharelull Coin'sMon.maextent of the't3 U Vllage Vne sltutes acrime.e Sectien 304 ing "Stein '8i." the campaignhis "lbs 110w New Yor t City committee that erved Miefulxtnt f heSeteber10. IMr. (b) of la BP race. agalmut Devd creditor's claims against Col- Andr teinw- the nel. C afterhe o &r by Dinkimn,. for hs cong al in total 5190 million. dpntihable theac- race. Stein '11I"may hme Musk School Settlmint "Green and his family have proclaimed champion of the meant"ieropunihbl violated federal dectin aws 135 ba Illf reet N.Y.C. IWU poor. the ditesed removal from office ThIrd Street toM the hak'dm4ptcy court aged. the f t, in the past year as it collected S I~la m4Is that, far from being partners, - has smenexplaining to do. gi nehefin the over 505,000 in contribution MUSIC io l m they are actually v s. Since Stein became boroulft or pro- rep&id 530,=0 to Stein. and they re ictim.acWMY We derfManhtattan in service,_loan,anis orn aytmun thing. trn, a January of 111. he has sc- miseorp"r'n infirm, any corporation.,form imo or spent 954os060as if Stein were to his congressional cepted more than 575.060in r entity wich runninghrth the the political donations fron knowg is interested set in th.D.." For bUilders, real estate SUN. May. 2,100 directly or indirectly in any sysulees. developers and brokers. and manner whatsoever in StinspWokesman Marty Information consetucti n compans. any...bIness dealminp with McLugMWicallethe dory a THE MERRY. MERRY MONTH OF MAY About Several of tsIe Corporations the city or any city amncy." "hasitchijob" The North/South Consononce presents "Oper of Classified Ads have either sought contracts Stein said houtism by John David Earnest and the world from or have had projects ap- contribuji saim... 's- the Worms" ord Of by Max Llfchiti for proved by the city's wi ge lRegitmate stf premiere of "Silent Flowers Esimate. of which Stein is a guest CALL togther and te Vllae mezzo and ensemble. Director: Max Llfchltz. voting ntmber. Voice wil ipore ftIt WIbe conductor: John Soldon and Judith Otton and Linda OR7.3131 Moreover. Stein enjoyed a abatchstjob " in Cl&ssified Ads Eckord.euest sopranos. AIso on the program pectaculiar vaclt hn FVm N.Y P , A1 M Get Results Wusby " eIon. DeIlbue nd Puccini and ote W-ustampton during June and July of this mmmer .. jI Call muscal celebrotons of Spring which he sdmits wag m - one day after news THE COMPOSER CONCERT Cohn, broke that Stein had privately A MAET TRANSNET possible by Seymour the "Silk OR7-3131 Admission S5 Seniors/students $2. 0 TDF accepted ASSOCIATES, who, with his brother-in-law decided to run in Sylvan Lawrence, is a prin- Stackin " 15h District - with a f tage story in 43tSMll A"e PhNYC -11imbtaaooNY,Ce. f In the Sylvan Lawrence cm o Ltd. '1 cipal VWg. an East Clerk.' Office AprIl I?. I64. Company. a real estate cor- Town and bumtnes own a eperate elert- nelgorPInd weekly. uset copil Is Peee 1411i. NY, poration which owns many Side TUES.. MAY S. 7:30 PM Gea. PIenr Traonenel rundine buildings inLower Manhat- The six-page "specqal Group. Inc. Lid Piar. Jeftro that Stein with assisting ar- Cb cotribeted ad Space to the Ci- report" contends JAMES J LAVELLE Aem RICHARD GOLDSMITH. clorinet Io. tan and leases us- oaprofltsGen. Per:tier.$1 e ty of New York. At last cout for the past year has been tists Donald Pirone. piano: Brad Alexander. percus- 4 Pn#.$1.00. 1% Term to Dec 450Laup.il Ave 31. 210 or earlier derision. Lawrence Com- bassoon. in a program of the Sylvan sion, and Alan Futterman, b1ankruPtcyor dIolutoe of Gee pany held nearly 53 million in Debussy. Karol Rthaus. Pinr No additional contribution. New vot. NY 10170 works by Mendelssohn. reaud be me Additional limited city leases and others. partners may be admited. No Richard Brooks priorty among limited partners Although there is some 1212-U07-4=3 whether or not .6be -e, "Sam fwwa, hmp, Admission: Free queStion as to ky.'sd W- S this or the other gifts con- i, hk h aw ham Ceeetace e Carer "VC '"M WALNUT PAW IV me94 WED.. MAY 9. 7:30 PM fe women i agmedl ASAXIATES (l2210CO7-312 S.0.8 i ioa Iatmp,8. il" Ispm. Oe tnwm Sq. NYC --susaeof DANCE RECITAL Cetlfacale ol Lied ParrifsV CARA GARGANO assisted by other professional asdto seep"0ame"U mewis Ited mNew YotkCowdy fet aO I. Feb I. i niWem uN dancers and selected advanced students. Also op- * IsmM t e issms" alm iwmproeo. le and pe- as the J mpsy "a Purn peoring will be Judith Ann Cummings. Sm m.5,ninueIemm dm mrr The W Pw. In. ( Mips, Appel &Waldon, Inc. Reader in Anna's Requiem. a ballot to the poem by UnI Sq. NYC .miid Pwlse, hN e. b .,mAmn. ou&PW l c e SucP.lkw'5e 1t hines Cdriem ow basedfproma The program is a varied one he set bsdmgd I. TePMn de. Ill. I NX Anna Ahkmtov. IIml eds d Se iDC from the SIrm. NW. Wam*An. Aemewfoesns * o Ina p mie t ranging from Opera Dances with singers bIsmiVt.an tak .I. 10MM1e 1 54.I. 31 PsU wBeg works. All Im July I.Mand -- h CW Post Opera Workshop to very modern Nosear frau year te eer Cariie Admission: Free FREE INVESTMENT MAIN IWST SEMINARS UNITE foremn -ese1MOlOhvha Nslih PARTNERSHIP, GUEST SPEAKERS -PROM THE NUVEEN TAX4WEMPT FUN AND OUROWN MUMM ONDSWATM WLu isctm TAX FREE INCOAM AND PISTOL LICENSES MUNICIML ONDS N.Y.C. y vymostUwfwE QIFLE/SHOTGUN & IUNTING PEQMIT9 Thurdafmournewat 434 Ave~ue of Iha Amadeu GUAPANTEED RESULTS New W4 N.Y. 10511 D ONE Ae~eenuunu mEws see ALL PERWORK Tom p em.was gumsww gse PERSONAL & CONFIDENTIAL REPRESENTATION (12) 42M

WEAPONS DISCOUNTS Twm. mwavd.in WW MEMBERSHIP 434 A SAWelIN&mmV^ Wmlit lle VANGE g No RIme Aml sIrIno, _,______e SAFETY & LEGAL TbAINING heisspi drmoetlr " 673-5472 477-2507 aelmeeuwrite remeet atIZN I,1 my deman 5 r e pweet I _____Sa. . - Z lur t an rt In rtrn for bbecu •MemsC-: N ,tONAL ssPLUAmoc(NRA), Fan W4. rw..bPfhsvLCuues is ibutkI Here she is-Miss New York Melissa Manning, the functions. Gail Young, "the music. performed sveral reigning Miss New York part she enjoys most is going classical pieces for the State, was in the communit) from ward to ward visiting veterans She .- ad they were $25 f"inner last Wednesday on a goodwill the patients'" Manning tI "Ist audience and very visit to the Manhattan V A delighted the veteran% by Appreciative" tiecuw "it's This week's winning number Hospital at 24th Street andI tandmng out chocolate bars WA often tI"I they have the is 122.14-1966 See page II and First Avenue, alter which she which had been donated for chance to tw exposed to Ger find out how you too can win stopped in tordinner at P J the occasion and signing shwin. Chopin. and Kahat the 25 weekly prizeand a top Reynolds, Second Avenue autographs on pictures of chaturian " prize of one month's free and 20th Street herself Her chaperone said She has heen Miss New rent The 24year-old beauty "they love her, we were con- York State slnc, last October. queen finds visiting the stantly having to pull her when she was crowned by state's V A Hospitals one of away from the patients. Vanessa Williams who went Weklv "hohught the most rewarding tasks of because they didn't want her on to be Miss America to leave" After a day spent cheering her tenure "'They love it "No one can make :'ou feel in- Manning, an accomplished up patients. Manning. Young. when Miss New York visits terior withour your Connt." pianist currently on leave and CDR Robert F' Wisom. because it makes them feel - ELEANOR ROOE;"LT remembered"* from Montclair State College USN. Executive Officer of According to her official in Upper Montclair New Naval Station N.Y in Melisa Manning state chaperone for USO Jersey where she majors In Continued on Page 17 own 5 .Ilczge2i I - VOL. 37. NO. 22 NEW YORK. NEW YORK. APRIL 26, 1984 25 CENTS Stein ducks all questions on $525,000 bank loan Manhattan erui IPin- 4ww Amdrew Smremaie- Oeor Mr. Stein end Mr. Pinkolaetin slgemnthis wekan adt Quwetion: Permit Town & V01i190 10 spOOk to surrounding is stee cam- p fud which may have the loon officer and get information about lted federa electin Steins loon of $525.000 from the Manufacturers tows. Hanover Bank which he then loaned to his com. hia rela- Stein and pubic more money tis firm refused to answer poign committee and was repaid specific questons on a thnn he loaned. SM0,m loan to Stein by Question: Let Town & Village see and discuss Manufacturers Hanover all mailings of Stein *81 this post year Bank and the campaign's repayment to Stein plus In- Question: Let us speak to David Sawyer about terest, of 658/,177, Stein con- the extra $40000 paid to him this post year tinued to hide items onhow (besides the $60.000 which was given as a settle- his campaign committee had ment of a dispute). spent $140,08; and he failed to disclose the nature and Question: Give us the names and addresses of substance of all of his mail- the score of people that were on the Stein 81 payroll so we can find out what they did. Svencalls throughout the week by Town & Village to Question: Let us speak to your computer ser. Stin's office were not return- vices for which Stein '61 paid thousands and d. Marty McLoughlin. who allow them to tell us what they did be employed by Stein SUNRISE SERVICE AT STUT OVAL: A special mess held early 1dOt Sunday used to prayer are from left to right: In the Borough President's of- morning. The men leading the residents in ice sod who is now with the Naresch Garasia: Pastor P. Schoepflin. Christ Church: Father Louis Glare. firm of Latham and St. Sebastian's Church: and Poster John Dralk. Holy Trinity Slovak Church. McLaughlin. said that he would answer questions on Candidatesreact Stein's behalf but did not res- The people Borough Presi- to give a much better ex- pond dent Andrew Stein will face in planation and a clearer ac- Last week. Town & Village his run for Congress. if he counting of how the money revealed that Stein's cam- decides to announce his can- was spent'* She questioned paign committee, called Stein didacy. reacted strongly to the propriety of raising '81, has continued operations Town & Village's Story on substantial sums of mone. into 1984. raising over Stein's campaign finances htile in an elected office I $.01,0n0 and accepting con. last week Betty Lall. one of think he ought to com' 'Out tributions over $1.flO. which two Oemotrats officially and nt'ke a 'tatnilent if used in a federal campaign. entered in the campaign said Itwcau it s to full a stor. to would violate federal law 'Stein owes it to his consti ignore.' sheiulded Continued on Page 17 tuency as Borough President ('ont inued on Pige i Questions and threats

Andrew Stein, Borough President material and answers to some of of Manhattan, apparently is in hot our questions The lawyer later sent wvt-r over his rampaign expenses us soifme gobbledygook papers and disbursements Last week which posed more questions than Town & Village revealed that his they answered 'ampaign committee, called Stein Then, Stein's father, Jerry '81, may have violated Federal law Finkelstein. stepped in. He as it collected in the past .,earover threatened that he would hurt us $500000) in contributions, lrepaid personally and financially if we $300000 to Stein personally and didn't lie down and "make peace." spent $140,000 in questionable ex- He called us twice, and each time clearing rubble from the former home of the to talk to sUitDOZERS AWAY: Workers penses. we asked for permission: cement company on the East River at 20th Street. The com- at Manufacturers Transit-Mis We met with Stein and his lawyer the loan officer been ordered to restore the site to Its original condition and the the Hanover Bank; to know what a pony has for about 90 minutes before N.Y.C. Department of Ports and Terminals reports that "work is going story ran. We were promis- score of people who were listed on original smoothly." ed that we would be supplied with ('ontinued on Page 4 TOWN & VILLAGE - THURSDAY, APRILsm L -17 When asked If anyone at Miss New York P.J Reynolds invited her out Stein federal prohibition was a Stein borrowed 1110e4 in "Since mt anof the Ien on a date Manning samidthe Continued from Page single family that gave near- July. Iui r for.a110. S2,ml from Manufac. Continued From Page I I ly $100.00 Nathan H Mager. Brooklyn. went to P.J Miss America runen tutrs Hanover Trust Con- turrs to Mr. Stein was fur- stipulates that she "can't ac- Steinhas denid tht any a former employee of Stein's pany at I percent over Reynolds where they a con- ther loaned by Mr. Stein to were cept a date" while at an of-money collected was used to father. Jerry lrinkelstoinmercialrateloan. Stin'8 (campalpfund Inot the special guests of co-owner ficialappearance further his congressional am- gave .3,M; his dauhter, Sten was Tom Reynolds paid back an of the interest e the lin Reynolds said that as Miss bitin . although his Alison R Mailer, contributed SW7,pT from his campaign woud be reimbursed by Stein Manning normally N.V. diursement dura the 831.50. and his son. Peter fund, wouldn't was thankingeveyod although he had only '1 to Mr. Stein.' go to a place with a and Setting ready to leave for peri roadse hke a major Mawr chipped in with pu in SM.,W. The ears bar because she doenas't drink ' m her DobbslFerry home"alln campalp. MeN.g77, his lawyer aysIs iW Stein and hs0lawyerwuld or smoke, but she made an the waitresses offered to The New York Poet Other Contributions. maly teres costs The exception at P.J. Reynlids lawyer, set permit this newspaper to switch places with her." reported last week that Stein tiomwealthy gave realtorsaad hute amounts.,nycorpoa- firmiThomas J. Schwat of the talk to Manfacturers about because "it is a really special Another of Mansungs would announce his can of SkddArmStage, aapect nelghborhood kind of place, of he ean and duties which brings her to the didacysoml Nee of the Contrilbutions are Meae & Flom, 8913Third wether thelean and interest and the employees and city deductile expenses ac" Avenue who is reputed patrons were all very nice" is to act as an official One instance0of €ntribow to be was repaid and who may preeter whenever a naval tions to Stein's state commit- cording to the Internal a leading election law have guaranteed the Pal She said she will "definitely ship. foreign or U.S..pulls in- tee well in excess of the It.00 RevenueServi.e apecianat be back there" with her said last week loa forStein. friends because "the food to New York harbor and was really out of this wor!d." docks at the passenger shi Candidates terminals on Manhattan s the candidates In this election Tom Reynolds said Mann- Navy "always Continued from Page I said he "thought the story which be was already West side. The to obey thelaw,and I will nost was a finepieceof Ing was "a very warm and gives me the Journalism outspending his opponent, royal treat- Bob Tembeckjian, who will hesitate to Callpotenial tht obviously raised talented person" and that me"it- she said. be up against some making it necessary to con' aside from her personal beau- Andrew Stein ntothe attention Oquestions thatMr. Stein will tinue receiving contributions The best part of being Miss and Betty LAMl for the m Federalo.the Ectio ty he admired her willingness New York, she says. Corn- have to answer publicly." He while in office from the very "is Democratic party's nomin- added: "I do question sO people "to help others who are less meeting all the wonderful tin If and when doing business with Stein an- Congressman Bill Green, fortunte Most cf the people people and being able to see nounces, said " expect all meone's running up an ea- the city. It raises some who found out that she was the Republican incumbent, mom deficit Ina campaign in hasthe Statetravele of New extensveyAYork," She ~ r ~ylrl eith calqu "he•dd visiting V.A. hoVpitals were making quite surprised and thought appearances very highly of her." throughou the state lls for tough sentencing Young said that Miss New Miss New York teaches York loves meeting people piano and accompanies oiler Justice Francis T. Murphy space intoaccount when they Divisions and signing autographs. 'all of the Supreme that In fIO hundreds of musicians, works frequently Jr. of the New York Supreme mete out sentence. The Court. thousands of apartment win- you have to do is smile at ass model, and also is a part- Court's Appellate Division. at state's prison system now Justice Murphy said in an dow in New York City would Melissa and she'll give you an time waitress at a restaurant 25th Street and Madison houses more than U.00 In- inteview that In the pastbe covered with metal imes, autograph.'" in the Bronx. Avenue, who called for an end mates - lie percent of capacity. judges had sometimes ben that private seauy to the drug trafficking in "reluctant" to send people to gas would Patrel the lob Madison Square Park last Letters The overcrowded prisons d in.bies, hallways and oftepsof Continued from Page 4 "OFF T POT" month. is now working to streets of New York Permit me to mggest that have become "lawless mar- so d a"approad d apartment uUdin, we make sure serious c.minals bargaining. He declined to totally ineffective as the the "Get off the pot" heading are sent to priso even If ches of robbers, rapists and would have toug him in roaches are all back in full to your April 12th editorial is felons of every kind," in part estimate kow many criminals sane," be said. them is not emouh space had avoidedincarcerationn Ordinary men andwome force the following day. I undignified and denigrates because of a "true and com- h fashidn. be continued, 'tol us that have bad the exterminator the reputation of your As President of the Fedra- moe perceptionf a failing bere on a few occasion to no Ua of New York State crminals have takm thecity. newspaper and the intended criminal-justice system." the In his statement accompa- that crime has beoke avail. message of your editorial. Judges Murphy released a resolution said. The orgsansa- Summeri here reo lon last week decla. IyIin thresolutis Justice government toiMees, hma and so am Yours for the elimation of Un represents more than Murphyaid thatthe climate the moral pexdon for justice the roaches. doubleentendrehoendP ing that with crime rmai- 2.010 judgesinchlIng ifg at high leves in the state, those of lear in New York would hasbeendrainouedtofsele. Name wthhed MeyerPs in state supreme Court.I have been "unthinkable" en tyad, Inbplactbeisa upon request 441 East 20th qtreet Judges can no longer afford to Criminal Court. Family take the shortage of prison ly ageneratlon Ae . overwhelmgin sen" of Court and the four Appellate "If then someone had said helplessness" The Medical Page 1!

STUYVESANT AMBULATORY FOOTCARE CENTER I - I tm P~IZmsI C - LASER SURGERY IN PODIATRY. Uimagine i~niUTeIW5S *Urgerya Itn my pact ce Pod soc msdfmc .eied s sy. I leav meieed cat¢ owsotsll dy andreseatch so At I cuwQdpou d reaetmeeI r my p..ent .th s lost tlchni ues wld mot up-4..doe euip. POIATRIC APP U ONS mewThe fl u'nme'e obgcts to.0o slisvec od catectt A dlscmfot end d.elsbteg e sb, ofgooproblems 0ec0s by As meet efficie end eo. in Fed" e'.aco "ldtablesey . ofwedwmgesconbe wre scsiss meens.- us"ally toductingtteeemes.I pain s.e eedis, at wothow ome' Swa ame sceadiltsea, minwmtin succuoy belep I lnsspsol coninement. enabling Os pee's. o mes 80eledb lotw cKde abosutcomfsoably iO eelest peibietme.

LASER - WONDER TOOL OF MEDI¢IE. FUNGUS NAU vepetlov so tIsw.plosi qw~.idu iew. alesr cosied ral rosesrh tc and oepewim3t i aiWelic owAsRed "Dwim"e6~bea laobw sr endospols. semarki. 9c0m0 eel odence ovauism d dowss'yAse.,""inme~ calm. i fow eavaidblelo ooffics _es.tooo ey0 :---,--my at lice to.tas oins ofo problems. WAr Tkoypsvw ~ow,etnpyaAs unesiaof-OAs 6W. bussedof CW THE GEATEST VALUE OF THE otwbwm.g"sbeam seetee As eor@-,*-stowm-y LAS TECHNIQUE so o AA& be NOW APMARS TO KIN MEDCINE boe"sbmise so is'o fm- o.ha batee. ccsully used is Afs e olfl epsmelogy der. ,tl, Oneo end ia t lise s a bdil l PmOKERATOM pomotsro m e=as covomeelo og=.l .mrwith As pesild=g-- fnet0e end ells. sid1 efect Seep" ms. mteOst pw"*M.alUMeewa lu~up Pate.. c ese dw=eealp -P ;r

mmd.agedWis some ases"tts-weOefth.Se blam causingCaes- FOOT PRODKEMS LATEST TARGET OF LASES. tsis setes.nemeseed . Od sobwsiisg byis Aolewsy calls -end oeAhm "0mes stdies ed 9steotts As twrotlng INGROWN NAU A ece.' dmpton oel As medcol lose t#atilie sin the rool otss &and oeueesAs leMedsesels tocostkolbd ,prevels 64letio.n end e s..'n. lte sp.e8. Asoernets lOwned mtentof .ort.ows Ilo ptobtoew toqu...tg.emovel e disosd ot1 do ged slue. Nowe. .- mo- (OSfas the &ne (sal e ) i sdstedod Therso no domsgo4ofrdetton empesiteThspaoretemitted by e oett sy nedcotitn mo 'O'-.o . danor-neIlght bulb ow TV Io o s,,ofa toy o |Nght the los heo" lfnag..Smo •,e .el 5 s$a0,. tsuo"0.0'*'.s NIUROMA Thaytt tse.o, fly toho the prosed'e ,-olcos in mot otales i mow -ot ther,.a loss. l""s . )d J,to-9, ...... o at!9 ha ol t f he 1-o-A-lt the toe. suopestOviite*now fall, PfKss ,os. m-baa tems oiolsibd witt 161 I. .d wd.0,. o i' t,piodh he'th 'ks 2r"sgt.oe , r,," ps the tos iot*' CPO,-.aos the .0-e Also "id . ,e,0. ol5 hd if,,. V,h', it ,l,,44 o,.J p.,;p,-fd,, othe I-A,,lod o,O ,, t'. . t~t,, p. es 5 4mo twiw4-S [dis4-star tO,, V * , "d'[. 1h. In"o, ,p,oiess ilr. George .IcDonal~d -"ast 31st Street 211. 1002~3 Jew York, iew York

- yr~

Leeeral a2cctiY )nCl~rJisof 1325 K St~ T, lashinc-gton Dc. 2

4-

p 449938_851200_ FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINCTON. D.C. 20463

May 11, 1984

Thomas K. Schwarz, Esquire Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom 919 Third Avenue New fork, New York 10022-9931 Re: Pre-MUR 123 Dear Mr. Schwarz: This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter dated May 4, 1984 pertaining to alleged violations of the Federal Election Campaign Act by Andrew Stein and his committees. In response to your request for a meeting, Thomas Wnitehead, Assistant General CQunsel, and Anne Weissenborn, attorney, have been assigned to this matter. Their telephone number is (202) 523-4000. Anne will give you a call setting up a mutually agreeable time. If you have any questions, please let us know. Sincerely, S ~#%j 'I>

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION WASHINGTON. D.C. 20463

MEMORANDUM TO: THE COMMISSION FROM: MAIRJORIE W. EMMONS/SUSAN M. TEIR DATE: MAY 8, 1984

SUBJECT: ORIGINAL COMPLAINT - PRE-MUR 123

The attached has been circulated for your infc.mation.

Attachment SKIADEN, ARPS,SLATE, M.AGHzE &i FLOM 91. TMI, A*Vs Ur. . NEW YORK 1002";9931

CABLE ADD0I9SS (11V 371-000 "'GPASLAW NdW YORK- TWX: ?to so, S1S mi D" Ivano g.ww T[CLC 64SS0SD ~SmC moo* isa2 753 1084

WILWSUEYOW66anM so",

$0 e00II" VU-EWA MEET LMSASeL84 CAL00A Owl 03)465.450

May 4, 1984 BY HAND VIA WASHINGTON OFFICE Kenneth Gross, Esq. Associate General Counsel Federal Election Commission 1325 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20463

Dear Mr. Gross: Pursuant to our discussion after your receipt of my letter of April 30th with respect to Andrew Stein, enclosed please find a memorandum and exhibits thereto con- cerning alleged violations of the Federal Election Campaign Act by Mr. Stein and his committees. Included are the articles from Town & Village newspaper.

I would appreciate an opportunity to meet with you or your designee after you have reviewed the enclosed materials. Thank you for your cooperation.

Encs. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

This memorandum is submitted on behalf of the Stein

'81 Committee, a non-federal committee which is registered pur- suant to the New York State Election Law, and the Stein for

Congress Committee, an authorized committee registered with the Federal Election Commission. The two Stein committees request that the Federal Election Commission investigate whether any violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act, as amended, has arisen by virtue of i) the expenditure of surplus campaign funds by Stein '81, (ii) the repayment of an obligation to D.H. Sawyer

%0 & Associates Ltd. which performed services for Stein'81 and (iii) CO a loan, the proceeds of which wer.e used in the 1981 campaign which

,'4 -I loan was then repaid. This request arises as a result of an article appearing in the April 19th issue of Town & Village under

0D the headline "Special Report - Stein Election Group May Have Vio- lated Federal Law", and a follow up article in the April 26th C issue, copies of which are enclosed. Because of the attention

which this article has received in the 15th Congressional District,

Mr. Stein is being tried in the local press, even though this Agency, which has jurisdiction over violations of the Federal Election

Campaign Act, has not reviewed the alleged violations. It is

therefore respectfully requested that a Pre-MUR number be assigned and that the Comission find "no reason to believe" that a violation

has occurred.-

BACKGROUND FACTS Andrew Stein was elected Borough President in November of 1981. As of that time his State Committee, Stein '81, owed Mr. Stein $520r000. Commencing in February IP82, repayments were made in small amounts so that by the beginning of July 1983 there remained owing in excess of $208,000. A fund-raiser in July of 1983 raised in excess of $128,000, another fund-raiser in November of 1983 raised an additional $135,000 and additional contributions continue to come in from time to time from the two fund-raisers. As a result a surplus existed in the Stein '81 fund. Under New York State Law, as'with respect to federal law, surplus campaign funds may be used for any lawful purpose in connection with the official duties of an off iceholder. See Opinion of N.Y.S. Board of Elections 1979-3. 00 As discussed below, each of the mailings was consistent with that principle of New York law. The mailings which appear to be at issue are as follows C:) and are included as an appendix to this memorandum: 1. Reprint of the New York Times, "Beyond Loving New August 28, 1982, York" - approximately 1,800 pieces. 2. Reprint of the New York Times, March 20, 1983, "Wanted, Ideas for New York City" - approximately 15,000 pieces. 3. Reprint of the "Get New York T~imes, April '.24, 1983, Ready for Phone Bills to Double" - approximately 11,000 pieces. 4. Reprint of the New York Times, May 23, Letter to the Editor, "Ill 1983, Chosen Approach to Rising Health Costs" - approximately 900 pieces. 5. Reprint of the New York Post, June "Rent H~ikes Should be 3, 1983, M~odest Again" - approximately pieces. 8,700 6. Reprint of the New York Post, September 1, 1983, "Let's give the MTA Back to the People" - approximately 2,900 pieces.

7. Reprint of the New York Times, February 18, 1984, entitled, "Preservation Laws Should Apply Equally" - approximately 1,000 pieces.

All of the above pieces were mailed to past contributors, community leaders throughout the borough, political leaders through- out the borough, past supporters and past campaign volunteers throughout the borough and the city, elected public officials throughout the borough and city, tenant organizations, block and civic associations, religious and fraternal organizations, veterans organizations and political clubs around the borough.

° dditionally, the following mailings were sent: 1. Andrew Stein's Tenant Newsletter - approximately 26,000 copies mailed to people on the West Side of Manhattan t(not in the 15th Congressional District), in November 1983.

2. Approximately 82,700 copies of a newsletter which was mailed throughout the borough concerning telephone divesti- ture, in November, 1983.

3. Upper East Side Historic District Letter (January 1984) - approximately 7,000 copies sent to the Upper East Side 0 calling upon the public to attend a hearing on landmark preserva- tion issues on the Upper East Side. 4. 421A Tenant Alert (March 9, 1984) - approximately 6,00 letters sent to tenants throughout the borough who would lose certain tenant protection during 1984-1985. CO 5. Murray Hill Historic District letter (March 1984) - approximately 5,000 copies were sent to-people in the Murray Hill area requesting attendance at a public hearing dealing with local historic preservation efforts.

6. Joint Andrew Stein/Carol Bellamy mailing (March 1984) on a hearing concerning women's rights in the workplace - 60,000 pieces were mailed to neighborhoods in the Upper West Side, West Side, Greenwich Village and the East Side, many more cf which were mailed outside than inside the 15th Congressional District. 7- Title I Tenant Alert (April 1984) -approximately 6,450 letters were sent to tenants in Title I buildings on the West Side and tbe Upper West Side of the borough. Additionally, the Stein mately Committee paid for approxi- 6,200 Jewish New Year's greeting cards and approximately 9,100 Christmas greeting cards which community went to past contributors, leaders and religious leaders, political leaders, political supporters and past campaign volunteers and appointed and elected officials throughout thi borough and the city.. The nature of these mailings and the characteristics of the recipients upderscore the fact that each of these mailings were done for a lawful purpose in connection with the official duties of the Borough President. In addition to the mailings, a portion of the $520,000 debt to the candidate remained outstanding through early 1984 and payments were made to D.H. Sawyer & Associates Ltd. ("Sawyer"), which had performed services for Mr. Stein in connection with the 1981 Borough President election. As of the end of the 1981 C election, there was a dispute with Sawyer as to the amount of the fee owed, and after the July 1983 fund-raiser, additional payments were made. These payments were in resolution of the dispute arising out of the 1981 election.* D.H. Sawyer has performed no services for Stein or any committee connected with Mr. Stein since the 1981 Borough President election nor has D.H. Sawyer been retained i.n connection with any federal election nor is it expected that D.N. Sawyer will be retained in connection with any federal election. See the enclosed letter from D.H. Sawyer. Given the fact that Sawyer has not and will not be retained in connection with any federal election, there could not have been a violation of the Federal UP% 1

Eleqtion Campaign Act.

With this factual discrepancy resolved, the only

federal issue remaining for legal analysis relates to the use of the surplus funds for the mailings. 1

ANALYSIS

As is clear from the above, the mailings related to issues relevant to the duties of the Office of the Borough

President. Indeed, most of the mailings related to purely New York City local issues. Moreover, dissemination was Boroughwide

and not limited to the 15th Congressional District (East Side- Manhattan) for which Mr. Stein has filed a Statement of Candidacy.

The Stein '81 Committee and the Stein for Congress Committee do not believe there has been any violation of the Federal Elec- CD tion Law for the reasons stated below.

New York State Law, as indicated above, clearly permits the use of campaign funds as has occurred in this case. Further- o more, federal law, as it has evolved through various Advisory Opinions and Matters Under Review, permits such expenditures

As discussed below, the mailings do not implicate the FECA and, therefore, the loan from the candidate does not raise a federal issue. even where someone is a "candidate" for federal office (which did not even occur here until at least February 17, 1984,2. if there is another non-federal election purpose for the acti- vity.

Thus# for example, in AO 1978-15 the Commission held that a candidate may act as a chairman of a fund-raising opera- tion for a charity where there was no mention of his candidacy made in the charitable organization's materials and there was no solic'itation, making or acceptance of contributions to the federal campaign nor any communication which expressly advocated %0) the nomination or election to federal office or the defeat of any other candidate. Similarly, in AO 1982-15 the Commission held that a law firm can continue to conduct-its business and advertise when one of its members is a candidate for federal, o office if the advertisements did not publicize the candidacy. 1W In AO 1982-56, the Commission held that the appearances of a federal candidate in a television advertisement for a state candidate did not constitute a contribution from the state

2 While a Statement of Candidacy was filed on that date, the activities occurring were clearly in the nature of "testing the waters" expenditures. Thus under and 100.3, 11. CFR Sections 104.1 the voluntary filing did not trigger Indeed, no candidacy. contributions were received until February and the $5,000 contribution 27, 1984 level was not passed until M~arch 1984. At the same time, disbursements 13, not of the Committee have yet risen to the $5,000 limit for anything Lesting other than of the waters", consultants and polling. officeholder to the federal since the advertisement was not for the purpose of influencing the federal election and did not mention the federal candidacy. See also AO 1978-4 (A testimonial

dinner may be held without regard to limits if no solicitation

or contributions and no express advocacy); AO 1977-42 (radio broadcasts not contributions if no solicitation and no advocacy); AO 1981-37 (Congressman may receive assistance from corpora- tions in connection with matters relating to his duties of office if no advocacy or solicitation, making or receipt of contributions).

MUR determinations by the Commission, as set forth in

the various General Counsel reports, also support the absence

of any federal violation here. Thus, MURs have made it clear that the "major purpose test" is not met and no violation occurs where there is another purpose to the expenditure under attack C and there is no solicitation or receipt of contributions and no

express advocacy. In MUR 1619 the issue was raised as to whether Rev. Jesse Jackson's trip to Syria involved campaign related

activity. Because there was ample evidence of diplomatic qualifi- cations and participation in the negotiations of one of Rev. Jack- son's assistants (Tom Porter), the General Counsel concluded and the Commission (5-0) agreed that there was no evidence that the trip was campaign related. Obviously, as is well-known, Rev.

Jackson's trip to Syria had a significant impact on his Presi-

dential campaign but none of the other indicia of campaign activity was present. Similarly in MUR 1476 an allegation was made that a

Senior Citizen Advisory Council picnic was a campaign event or activity. Citing AO 1980-89, 1980-22 and 1980-16 concerning

appearances by Congressmen during re-election campaigns, the Commission determined no contribution or expenditure was involved because of the absence of any communication expressly advocating

the nomination or election of the candidate or the defeat of another candidate and there was no soliciting, making or acceptance U of any campaign contributions.

Similarly in MUR 1458 an allegation was made that expenditures for travel, lodging, polling and telephone ser- 0O vices were made in connection with a federal election. With respect to travel and lodging, it was held that the appearances

Iwere in connection with the state officeholder's position even 0 though they overlapped with the congressional district in which

the state officeholder was a candidate and that any benefit to the congressional campaign was incidental. However, with respect to polling, it was determined that since certain ques- tions would clearly be an aid to the feaeral campaign that there

should have been an allocation. In this case, all polling in connection with the federal campaign has been paid for by Stein

for Congress. Similar analyses appear in MUR 1283 involving the Readers' Digest, MUR 1372 and MUR 1298 ("public exposure

by an individual as a candidate will not be presumed to be for the purpose of influencing an election, provided that it can be shown that the appearance had some alternative justification").

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, it is respectfully sub-

mitted that there is no "reason to believe" a violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act, as amended, has occurred. Either

a Pre-MUR or a MUR humber should be assigned and, based upon

the inftormation set forth, a finding made that neither Stein '81 nor Stein for Congress violated the FECA as a result of the activities herein described.

May 3, 1984 0 m 'Best mom 'contest is now

ftV amsus . o s or Pak Avems so New York, N.Y. loM A Iatlsat 14 yerw mm is It'sam lllmaN le Un aml n .ad-BODY St.;WAVE so &Pe" RoiL. 0on a" 0=0w t"u dsomsand phone neu ING, Mort's NMa StI CVal"leves bos a poml,At bot SMat writn, smdhi or 334l411,A"., at 198L; laourned Careof e, a tishotnminee for -Meow of GARDEN. rWomOM rhymoelgit. 161year. Tiit, A4 rlaw no, Pasoaroul. Among themany prsm to mr Iit A 5. am uth suoo may 4 is be awa to the wasIng .); G.i. dMdeadline for all entries. AUTOMATIC CiTRUS ts wIIIs mote will be nowio am* thorns10112. JUICER. VrMi Hdawar%, m old In T&VJUt prior doatiled by ioai urats: 152 East X St. L..a-3r HOT KOSHER SARB. Ave. BRUNCHS, M TWo, toMew s Day QUED CHICKENS Zesky's P J Reynolds Reideo , t drto esteb con-Doilicatesom. IN 3rd Ave IL. wnlin M wetn or lss (II-I? St 8W G rr CER. Mq- Inid Ave., UiM t., '"hye COMPLETE LUNCH P03 o Consider your Mom TIrICATE. Bloom & Knp. TWO. Flral'sTwmtgri. 37 Is b hebs ho sew an it. =Fist Ave 113-13St , $i0 lan to Town SViliags. GIrT CERTiriCArE, Firs Ave. -21 Si; DIN. Z15 H NER ENTREES FOR TWO. !F n IIc. V . 37. 0O11 NEWYORK. NEW YORK, APRIL 19. 1984 2 CMcllm I 25 UN'S SPECIAL REPORT Stein Election Group May Have Violated Federal Law M s3 or Predent Andiew Stein's ~ ~ culedSt '11I,the year he No-w ow tiiY~vt%M B Steft flW aout -rideu) may have violated $101.0111NathanL K.&go. a -m epso of Th.e131 ampp ii cm aaaye mas IIIam stemn's father. Jerry rinsslamelit gave mw; his he has bam M in th Psm year as it collected daughter. Alison R. Mailr. contribuled 31*M1.and byido cmpsip fod #or my Utlalo.repaid Satooss to himson. Peter MaWr. chipped moey ta beepm. tein bomuoed IStu, in in with O32S. other July. 1111. from Maclmrednm linur =45,6 as if Stein were running for contrutIons. mosuy wealthy realtors and Corpora. True OwlawImi .hCDwhich en- compiy at I Iradvro s omfem la rae lan. tions gave hugs amounts (see lists inside. Non of Sb wal lpapai bek r7.Iro ie comp oi he Contributions are deductible expensi ac- fnd, alhobed w limits individual contn..u- cording to the Internal Revenue Service onlyputn 8m T0e4e0ra aum in C08di09se. campgaigns to $100o per 12w. his lawyer as Is Costst The Stein denies that any money collected was usad to awyer. 7ThomsJ. iarli peeyr urdeltion. Corporations and further of te firm ofSadm elm~~ his conressional ambitions, although his ArPL Sa1e0 M11mgher.& lum. selemictlyprohibited. Once a disbursements during the Period reads like a m&jor 92 Th1d Ave 1111,wOW ' rcderal law, he of- campaign. Who is repaud to be s p i ,ca said , " Si nc n ta a ll leading of hM l eoctiman sN l olaww ) all"o A media consultant during Stein's race for e mmilse has both received o from mbac wn to Mr. Ste was lfthr ln- S o w the 1.000 federal limit&- President in I8I was paid a whopping edby Mr.Sti toStanli 8canmp,a fmdt - I=R0 in mom" of the 33.0W to become 1,00?The same media consultant. D Sawyer. a was paid in the last year 540,000 besides N e00In ofStein lbs hate at lssa would be Miimersd by Ienmamllmiggs is, though. orgaw- 1= Stein '11to Mr. Stain" aw claims that the payment in 190 was for Stein and Ws lawyer would nut limm liomitation for contribu- disputed bill left over from his campaign back permit this in nNew .' is tak to anuactorems aba any I d 181 for Borough President against David Dinkens IntMad year extraordinarly who he narrowly defeated after spendinlg over 1 a11ec1f01 ekm and whetera lean and was pMd and wo maY hve ranteed interestSe per. soal an forStei. 'hlis ronummtby T wn & Village w e made and rejcte Stein said there were Noguaraatoo wo would hor nlole if he did not pay bac Mamfactuem It isbink policy not to disc onncial deoaw of a customwe j AuM rboTo RUN FOR ntaimmdaRPV31ae

, -,=b l.....CONGRESS

AN so on ung b rs de t nd w St n ha en e a tw we k p r o of s c d ,cneet uadd ecddtoofcilyene heDmcrtcprmr frCn

amp b York 1111Ma* ter aigapl PostaNewhtsoe reported iin its eiduwhnsrknWednesday edition NOWNoam President .Andrew Stein had ended a two week periodthat Manhattan itneoof second and decided to officially enter the Democratic primary for Con- lesIthe IRh distritt, It Peg reported. "Friends said Stein finally decided to make race , ., the taltina pol that shwed him behind'tut'within striking distance of "' to" IHLqxplilcanWilliam S Green a S-*WN &VILUG0A - ThUSAY. APRIL19. 11164 0 Stein Election Group May Have Violated Federal Law Contied from Page I contest each other. The decisive vote is usually with housing complexes in the Coney Island sectio of without permisMn of the individual Involved. the other three members of the Board of Estimate. Brooklyn. And Gledman was no newcomer to In June. 111, the Sterting National Sank and Besides his Board of Estimate vote and issumil pro- politics. He knew, as well, the considerable Trust Company. 540 Madison Avenue, lest Stein's clamations, the Borough President has little to do. generosity of the Trumps when campig campaign M0.000 that was guaranteed by ten men However. he can help in taxexemutlons and using contribution time came around. including Donald Trump.Edward R Downs. Jerry his position to g a friendly hearing. "When Trump's 421-A application was filed. thta Finkelsten. Michal Fr Sylvan Lawrence. Mayor Koch in his book "Mayor" tells how Stein was soon a call from Manhattan Boroupg Pro- Arthur Emil. Steven Grember. Saul P Steinberg. sought to ai Donald Trump with a tax-exemption dent, Andrew Stein Stein had. earlier, been the ih- Irving ringeritt, and Sherman Cohen In addition. with Trump Tower ject of damaging news stories as a result of his ac- most of these men contributed heavily in cash The Mayor said: epting the use of a sumptuous sunimer house in the Trump and his real estate corporations con- -On acquiring the Stth Street prqey, the amptons free of charge frar. another Manhiattn tributed 824.000; Saul Steinberg. 330,000 and Emil younger Trump announced a project commen- real estate baron. Sylvan Lawrence. In that ca 37500 Emil just last week bought the former Police surate even with his own ambition The Trump Stein arranged a meeting with Trump to which he Headquarters on Centre Street. Organization. he said, would raze the nine-story invited Tony Gliedman to discuss the 421-A exemp- Although Stein says that he isvehemently anti- Bonwit Teller Budding. a great favorite of Art Deco tion on the Bonwit Teller site." landlord, he has sought and obtained extremely aficiondos, and construct in its place a sixty-eight- Although Stein tried to help. Trump was turned large contributions from many real estate story steel-and-glass tower containing 3m0con- down The matter is still the subject of litigation. magnates in Manhattan One real estate man. who dominium units and vast areas for commercial use At a meeting last Friday with Stein and his elec- did not give to the Stein campaign who wanted to re- on the lower floors To be called 'The Trump tion lawyer. Schwart. in the borough presidet's main anonymous, said. "Sure. he is disliked by the Tower.'" it would cost, he said. 5155 million to build Municipal Building office, Stein was asked to ea- smaller real estate apartment owners who are lock- The W7 ,7009one-bedroom condos and the Trump plain what services were rendered by Election ed in. but the moguls got out of rent-control years Tower's jewel. its 53.15-million triplex. would both Computer Services and a firm, called 0 S .. both of ago Now, they want tax easements, city favors on be ready for occupancy in late 1932.For this Donald which were paid a total of 17.00 in October. II& zoning and whatever a vote on the Board of Trump wanted an estimated S30-540million tax ex- and January. 1904. Stein and his lawyer declined to EsUmate is worth." emption under the Section 421-A program reveal what services were perfomed Each Borough President has one vote on the "Anthony Gliedman was my Commissioner for Margo Marabion. the owner o4 Election Computer Board of Estimate making five votes The Mayor. Housing Preservation and Development Glied- Services and OS, 575 Lexington Avenue. reused the Comptroller, and the City Council President h man. like Trump, had his roots in Brooklyn He to answer questions relating to her work for the two each Each Borough President for the most knew the Trump Organizaion from its gigantic Stein campaign committee. She did confirm that part goes along with a "'hone-rule vote" and do not Trump-Warbasse and Trump Village subsidized Contued on Pae 33

NbrM()M1

$10 GIFT CEPTIFICATE TWO 1M06513 PAUSIII4NI $20 GIFT CERTIFICATE FOR FILM PROCESSING MAR HE (110. 126. 135F9k) "U!rm ST- PIE RRE THE YEAR MOTHER OFMaOM Co, wlefSeIecto I H rdbeck I o s & 5 , TOMAR INTERNATIONAL CORP , 'r1LS~. Ite m kelh ha. P,ain-ieesm a Pamemii Aun. Clessicol Cmsee Tapes. Open 70"s 320 lost 23rd St. 677- 3"l 3rd Avo. 126-27 St.) 6GW5S7ll

G.E. AUTOMATIC CITRUIS JUICER $10 GIFT CERTIFICATErpoe MOTHER OF THE YEAR SCIroS OIASIWTO STS YEAR ARESME RLO MH. L mSTON,OF THE INC EIegTHtk11ppe O (moo-s VoALE MOTHER FTHE YEAR MOTHER

'20 GIFT CERTIFICATE MOTHER OF THE YEAR FROM ram MOTHER OF THE YEAR CAFE DEL PRADO MOTH F TEYA GRAMERCY PHARMACY 1 14tL k (18t. HDELMAN SHOES 14- 2331 st Ave. at 14 St. AL 4-48%

G.E. FNIAN RADIO RUNCH FOerTWO WITH TV SOUND - ('40 VALUE) MOTHER OF THE YEAR MOTHER OF THE YEAR BLOOMCERTIFICATE & KRUP MOTHER OF THEYEAR, W d rL*WVHEM GIFT WWIU0KW UAE 20 SIGlaAm(18s W-M 359 2nd Av7. (21 St.) 41 A VILLAGI - TRIMYAY. AI t. -U Sen iou, Stein Election Group May at of~q sd ssse Is Min

Sos "61111111sis Have Violated Aba u INS..oi Federal Law Is awaded a rmnsee Vaos =ly! bw ~bo* C*WWN hum PqP to S. Deoiiiei of al. = The Stein campaign committee recently spent Okap. Aatbrspoka ad her companies peciallsed in voting lists. Election 520,20 for postae and 8l4,00oIn pnntng to mail G olseme ske hUo. its Computer Services is well-known among politicians material to voters. Stein declined to reveal the con- sil of Aubrne s U1lo h inpmo il to b who um malling lists and lists of voters for cam- tent of all the malings, to which voters were the merebrem is a stis.r mailings made, and in what reas. Stein did supply Booeorebes wll be -ui 6 in January. 1N,the Stein '11Committee filed one maling concerning A.T& T. bh Sioldoi, - bUosbs- rl with the State Board of Election a financial Listed on the January 15. 104. fling of Stein '51 disihesen d AAA wid W~ disclosure statement which said that it had no Committee was an expense to theBoard of Elec- liabilities. However, Stein admitted that it owed lions.131Varick Street. for 857.71 for voter lists. No.000 to a media consultant. D Sawyer and that The Board of Elections sell voter lists at 57 per thou- since the bill was In dispute it was not listed as a sand on a cash basis Patricia Cortesof the Boar of liability Sawyer was paid theSO.SO KEEP IN THE KNOW by Stein '51 Elections says there were two purchases: one in SUBSCRIBE TO TOWN A VILLAGE A veteran politician expressed amazement that May and one in July Each time. she was told that it the Stein '81 was still collecting huge amounts of was for the Borough President's uffice and that she LESS THAN 10' A WEEK ! money nearly three years after Stein was elected should send a bill "They didn't pay the bill on YES - SEND ME T&V 1 Borough President and that soliciting was being time" she says "It took until December 14.193 un- done to pay off Stein and at the same time that tilStein 'I paid the bill - six and eight months E 1 YEAR - ( 52 WEEKS) FOR 55. money was being spent in huge sums. late." 0 2 YEARS- Stein was asked by Town & Village what 23 per- Stein laid that the lists purchased were for all (104 WEEKS) FOR $9. sons listed on the filings had done to earn salaries of over Manhattan. Cortex disagrees and remembers 0 3 YEARS - (156 WEEKS) FOR $12. 5210each which was paid a few months ago Mail that "the lists were for downtown." The number of ing addresses are supposed to be listed, but there names was 6,000. ZIP CODES 10009: 10010 10003; 10016 were noe. Stein soid. A have no idea what they Lawrence Halloran. an attorney, yesterday said ELSEWHERE PLEASE ADD 5 TO ABOVE dI" that "The Federal law says that anybody who NAME: Town & Village located Jean Shevlin of 5 Stuyve- spends mo e than SII0 to influence a Federal ee. sant Oval, oe of the women named on the list who tion has to file with theFederal Election Commis- CITY: earned 5210. She said that she had checked Board of sion and explain where tmo y came from" STATE ElWtio lists for persons who had voted in certain Town & Village has printed the federal filings ZIP: ...... years, She reused to elaborate. Stein refused to from Cangrelss WWiiam Gree. Republican In- MAIL TO: tOWN AVILLAGE provide the address and phone numbers of the re. cumbeM and Bety LaD. candidate for the CICULATlON OPT. mainingnames. Democrat nomination. 2S PANK AVE.. 50. N.Y.. N.Y. lSX gifts shell adce

9 Piece Family Dinner for Mother of the Year TInnS S11 011 from MOTHER OF THE YEAR REGOOS ROOST $20LGIFT II IiE Oeciem,€ Fried Chckea E So PETE S"A*PIACE Free Prompt Celivery 24. First Ave. ot ISth St. S33-5240 IN letsAY& (ec. 21911t.) 3611621

S$10 GIFT C-"TMFICATE FOR DINN E FOl TWO $20 GIFT CERTIFICATE Plus Our Speudl Belem@of iiln Win. No- MOTHER OF THE YEAR MOTHER OF THE YEAR FtOR ENESLOW OMFu SHOES1 LA STADA EAST ESrAUNT 274 413-1f-d3A7.(212S.IWProt Airsn i Pheeme 77.740 3"9 rW Ave.0t1911t." 477-2IM

BRUNCH FOR TWO DISH GARDEN MOTHER OF THE YEAR MOTHER OF THE YEAR PM MOTHER OFPmOs THE YEAR ZOOKY'S DELICATESSEN Flowers By Twilliht IOtW IftP011 OL OCCASIO111111 1oTMIALS MABIMlYO3EVUlS AMC~y RESTAURANT 5 1E4s201 St.(nr. Ist Ave.) GIRS-70 345 2nd Ave. (2OIh St.I 473-9M7 I*ikdA9uI14l7SQ 9046"

s450° ,.ermor "wvea esting COnPLETE LUNCH FOR TMO , $10 GIF CERTIFICATE me MOTHER OF THE YEAR MARK'S MOTHER OFTHE YEAR coutu~mlhs oP MUOM HAIR SITLISTS 011s FRANK'S TRATTORA Gramercy Park Flower Shop "We T6ik To You About Your Heir" 347 LitAve. (2-21 St.) 677-2991 3341t Ae. st 19th St. 477-2354 20 Third Ave. (ow. 21t St.) Cos. Hlere she iscomMis~ Yorkx #25 Yier

Akom deisdOWm r is h. Ihas 1 i In am""ftlr d=. a P. 00*aMm oldam do"*Afh 011ipll. VAftkut po s om On ,tmdO -a

iaIe V.A. Wolbak n od o Ikepalomi."tin" m Wlliam 11111W ft mWA 11111111tub ofhmmbdd':1111 W er emseilmAmorifs .i hNA be ft"e: "n"e 111111it Isev." Aftoradypi hr

saoel s her UMicaisW whleSkteal No.Mi ava Itahm4POP 1111i ms, _____ oqwn amVI caxseF2 .'22 NEWYORK. NEW YORK. APRIL 26. 1964 25 CENTS Stein ducks all questions on $525,000 bank loan

-raowSi aind Doew'Mr. Steen and Mr.Fiukelstein -ms'q misiimeam- tie: Permit Town & Vise to speak to p md wk may hew the loan officer and get information about Sen s loan of SS25 000 from the Manufociurers Skisn -, lkmi olel. Nanover Sank which he then loaned to his cam. tsmeMi firm romedamoem is aaswera a paign committee a. d was repaid more -orey than he tconed. Question: Let Town A Vitloge see and discuss tSmloambih tle byI all mailings of Stein S1 this post year. *ropayt is ls ids Question Let us speak to Dovd Sawyer about a ed SU0 e aped the antra $40 000 paid to him this post year U as wde poofm ro. (besides the $60 000 whict' wos given as a settle- ment of a dispute). isata Mach MyM mmkem Usft asewar k Queehon: Give us the names orn addresses of I; lalodisheOm11174p.asyedem's oSI@emd he flm-Sa*s the score of people that were on the Sten 91 oaace all Isis mal-fo payroll so we can find out what they did. Question: Let us speak to your computer ser vices for wiich Stein 81 paid thousands and ft dislos ft natim as SUfls seWr AT Sill OVAlS A pecild meee held early les 1edm't allow *m to tell us what they did lmoil,m mm leedlg els e reeld s Is Pmyomarem ft lefteefrgh op 16,110 beisWosol Normsw Oereeto Pwe P. SdNhep4. rl5 C o feW tetsmL Sdmkr St. Sekm"In's chr mod Peeto Jew groll. Noly Trknlty ShmeMk Churh. flea atmmLalemm md SWMs h f hiof t ml Candidatesreact ex- TMweek Tm & Viap the people lermelPreft" to give a much better SAndrew Simewell fae in pLasand a clearrr ac. rneveled thi Stells's am- his fur for Coetpee. if he counti of how OW Mow.% dcides i amm ce hiscan- was spe t "She qsutesixed St. has ceisamed to ae propriety of raising Ao 55W reisieperts~m ave r didecy. reacted MaMy Tom a Vllap's Story an ausumtia am of mte. Iueem asd acepin coe. SteiN's Campain fnanes si an eeted oftte I trdbilUon ave outer if usedi Stee. wisicte s week etty ll. e Of tin he to :Qffw twit ua feealb camp. two Dmacrms ffictally and make a 6tatement wroulvslat federl 111 emlered ente camsnpasaid I1CaUWit' ta full a *ter'.to CastuSed Pasm' ? -Steta elm 9it Islec ti l-mare."* sh ddd Questions and threats tiaOcy as IeWAO Preedeit Continuedon Past I' And" Sten, Boroug Prmdent material and answers to some of of Mallitaa,' apparently i in hot our questions. The lawyer later sent water er s cama expees s some obbledgaak papers and duabarsment. Last week which posed more questions than Town & VUIl revealed that hi thenswered. camPai committee, called Stein Tn .en's father. Jerry I '81, may have violated Federal law Finkelstein, stepped in. He as it cooeesed in the past year over threatened that he would hurt us SM-,O0 in contributions, repaid personally and financially if we W00,0to Sten personally and didn't lie down and "make peace." spent $140.000 in questionable ex- He called us twice, and each time p0me. we asked for permission: to talk to -Ui-oO0U11 AWAYt Wedhers cleorek rulbble from the formar home of the We met with Stein and his lawyer the loan officer at Manufacturers Trensit.Min cement ompoey em the Slet Ever at 20th Street. The Com- for about 0 minutes before the Hanover Bank; to know what a pony hes beon ordered to eenore se site to Its orllinel erodition sod the o0 yran We were promis- score of people who were listed on N.Y.C. Doertmant of Pairt eod Tatmtinsl roers thet "work is gaing id O would be supplied with ('ortinuei on P.etr 4 smoothly.- 0 T1 AtVILtLAGE - THRDY APRIL 25k Will 17 Miss. New York m "m" tei let rd nW a am btamocd N.SA* in satna" a kk ~at~ksdFa a saigaidthe Ca.opilfd tramnfa& s Ip4 ftuma5m.ra, GM Mar.a July M. base tan Illin caN1W&I he F.J apa Amulsado_ *bamrue &C ~ m mpam=4= an i "" a p a ave acam. mW sllo , n 1 ommacolleted wamnead to ft - -- thar Iaaa by Hr. skis VVEWIM.aiiOf 7 ZWs , 0-bWa W"ne"SA11it fa)N I "Paid b141ackidofl uthei d lbbaa btiao m w foeu a am Him his' Allo aw tr m isa c am a~I oulde rl byhsi N.. =_aalgvm~gd dmllwom t during h lb5.56. 26 PlceWit aad no fteHd.although he km-7 1W rSti Ilsiant hdno drn bha period reads like a mWrHu c~ppd in Wia IA in. Thil extra CMPP IN0% 4110IT3 kib W~laye sps islaW li ONla111d1011111 kmdWWO a on"" bu ob med an Mi Now- Yak Pad 06kw cauiolm smaul taroot, cogsaThe lawyer, not Permit t"ml toagpa asspiam at P.J. Reynolds Isp0n oare 1" astwe kstat Stow weMYlh tasa sna reate and eami5S 'Timas J Schwars af thmeta to Hafeurs ti realy apaial Author imng coul aiac ia caft- tliM ave huge &E5U5Wfirm af Skaddan. Arps, State ~M : -s Wadlo plam. emu sti brings any 0 m ofathlb baa aid her to tedidacyNWdsassuilel h W'eHaag A P1ol, 913Thrchuthe maaamd 0~al Wi hia ad it isgoac ananWW Oft imiAcs Ofcsm*ti-a1t dedatit pa5 ml5 eupmas ac- AvenumWhos is reputo to bm was repaid m Oft May, ~l~ I". pair slimaco a novel HOWto Stei's state commit. carding to lbs 11111010111a Ima-i miacim law hmaveguarauteed bam am wil " lb parsamal tdapiil Lemor U.S.. pelts Wi I" wail inexceso at slSM RevamaService paclatn, said loot week loan for Stein ei WASIWW . wnsr ;;-bspa.6Wp Candidates thecumilaes inthisaelectionaid be 'tacow" th story Which he wam idlcadp fe. adNA oat Th'mNv,,lway Conalntaion PageItoillyo l7eaw.andI wllmmot tasae atJournalistso outapinding .Lwsmkd 1115se tO5*royal tra Bo Tgamnat Andrewh Stai lmltls his 4ppgeso, adsw th bat "she mid b to tal PWatna tha oiuly raised sama making it mecscsaaryto cow aswifmbThebea panof ein Mis anben upaand at Aoltr Steim violaintteratention Cof qh10t111 HrSanWillAh tinumrse*vmng contribhtion tyedmulrw lieneft BetY Lil fr te te reera Elet- 11-have tn anacar publicly " He wile %c York. dmasays. --is Democratic pary's nmonmia-minsim." added -1 do Inoffice from thevmr Ia abalbebs m am a1in an the wondertui tion, quasesn so- People doing businssm bilarmHuft it and w-henStain as- Conggessnain Bill Grass. t cow's runningoup an anor ta city It raises mm Of90paspl people ad being able loswe nouncesasaid -I expt all the Republican incumbent. bs Nee 00 tat Omacam tam mnomideficit is a campaign in eithical questionsaha add wiigVA baspitala were box Statetravata of W York ' Slhm tif expytallnt ugh mdadthagat apeaace UOS se ten in ver higly of liar - trAoe uto stater M urph o o gh se tnc n Younaai that Miss Now "in N"c yakt basis mutin York town_ people plwm ac~companias ~~e justice rrancis T Murphy Opc Ntaconchnhe nmlao;of the Suprenia that Is 199t hundreds of ap uo ANt i uiaciam. wafta lirenitmy Jr of the New York Suprem 01ee O wite ros The Court. thousands of apartmnt tw m is aa modid ad almais a pan- Court's Appellate Diviioni. at 21,1110'pimuo sysem not Jutice Murpty aid to am tims in Now York City Would y anvua ~~- eaat a roiura Wt Street and Maison boomamore tan 3&NIkae in ta i wet as ecvamt ne os Sipp.is the ofem Avenuea.cbscallsd foram end mute - l16 Pert to Of ad W oeimsbe anidthatprvt iii N ths drug tralfickinI cavetty _reluctaol' to sand people go pirds couid palrel 00 1811 Lesters WoV TI1ZPD'!, month,is now carting to a Yr hadhata~prip ad CoimidramPuae Pout bias," hallwys ma r Weka we to maplioothat moames riou vW~aIhav taoalal bargin. He declined to localy , la9lv an tameStGot aeftha ' bing are a to prism ace rembes hll aeni alearAprl bft :.= it ChueON owbe rapistsamaided mutsn adm s tervsnomom No aNverykind. " Ii pan aKimao howrmy criminals a. imd bans a otct aw prl imelluidma hee s 0o10141011btmm a ahad md c avoidewlddincarceratm in OndI5U" son 8" "Mm- Sm IN day. I kmi d dnigrat AsPrai1 of thmPidiera ne bmwehad SmwaWMNIWa Sm r"paathe of yaw tina pwiroi of a (ad" d tubm criminids bavettas Smuity. taes a ins sacidas o a tbcidijsb y th in no maie Ibi'ic ha chia to a isssppie' ad Smeiimadid Judging,Murp rdimud ama sai.arata kmn below eaL.msm yew odawdiesadsherial-e"h pinIbrsiuo.Jaicgsemttoabssht kmmsa bale" s h aotm Jmegoeia oftbmd anr Yam for Sm elimatlam I" Woo*disac tn lelsIi more thi Haipty amithat tamcliate, thmmoel Pug" for jmles, Swmssim insebambsip~that5MWith at MEO lmmcd 2-M m Wchon Siam otfear o piew- York would tamtamn drinemd owlo amcb Haye e at hi to- inteso in Sts pe m COWL ha1Veem "tdakmL~e" OW-#Y mad IN We placs Is UPm no"" 441East u strs ugam a SM ______m Word to Crimii Comet. Pamoyly p m w atlu ovorcbiEms aims a take Smeshotage of pIm. ComNtad Sm Aisdd -m-If kaa ""t~ , ,

STUYVESANT AMBULATORY CENTER LUMIP _7AM.FOOTCARE Imalne Kniffeless Suraervl

Sb WINDa .osami. h6e1%I covid 0 - L. Z.g'0eq am the AMm"ui Ies19 MSftee eng cWrW thed"gOwgio9 POOATIC APPUCATIOINS ca moI.i Sofe weg by ** w mo~wom ow oS oPw&& V * cew..aie w"e Si to edwoolco be tW ad _Of oft mo S01eu0oVW C... * .0. g900.61y1" b"eg fm- ~Wmvofutem -'ecuf bwmat WPft ROOMI MANS

yam...5 wee '5.WW a Ws-le $-q.cw.I*'he *Wo MWy '0W-hugo~ ~ _" codw",owlo~s-am.g LAW aWAIO 1 W1111199. WAIT sn emgfe.OW omt . wi bead Si 0*mi.VWq Mhey eg owy ooWtewndofteodfSi ow 0"641111ao~SiCo 0141W..W. . -. WesW"qw ow a e-seee.w" 00 lowo -" be teeeeog ohew"be". 'eic icon" of %o WOW fntooqe eanscsaowt'Z 0

WWIIIIIIIAIIIT0A11110LASUS. 1110OKATOSIS on"'oft" eu.elbSoa eee~m.cCW" a odeo menom-e~~ eOWeor"ewovey Oaes - '*am." 0-11 cloeVgdUP b -11,1= ma amd .m ow06sde so djo, ad Wgem mews-ro - WWS. roaee i VVm"-w -eeNo bAode-legsN i Iw.bthe cow 0%0w1 obww asdw weelbenown-s 6 wewmm 41001111of WOOns~ow"iwmaom MW 0m ias ow~iaaido~g m cwsis me - so W i Low a..ow~~ wm 'edosge ow 9 141114 A - eoi of fgotno&*. WWow.0utm . "90o mo .c1 ma..~soe wate"Umy W40WWn T Cnim" befami tm. ma Mom - o f AN*.gadA *- 60 611 'amam Si#a ow ma Weve OWa-W-0 9"ma MOST INSURANCE PLANS ACCEPTED Dr. Arthur D. Freiberg, DPM, FAAFS 3 10 First Avo. (Cor. 18th St.)

In Stuyvesont Town M-t- A P-J A-, AA-b., A, A y f 777-7998 W V 77

Sic t~tv 3jok4 1te SATURDAY, AUGUST 38, IM

The world watched as we slowly time it takes a pruject w ruceive v' r-hted ourselves and began our green Iht from the city. reCtoy. For five or six years, there Second, aur tax policies for cowa. Beyond was certainty, predictability, direc- mercial proWrties must be rede- tim and eve a vague sense of prom. sine to gie potetial Investors lseandprospe.1ty. pMter ceraiy. Instead of abate Sing But a policy born of crisis breeds mit that an granted, only to be m new crises. Fueled by the incentives, Wr d whens pia wisnds shift. office buildings skyrocketed, real es. we sld Instttut a "Certain tax tate values soared and along with heel," which giarants an eqitlbl New York them rue a political bua and cry to tax rate for a specified mm ef tap this new wellspring of potential years. Thn tax level should, in e tax revemu - in effect, to repeat sn, be inaked to a project's iMal By Andrew Stein past mistakes. Real estate taxes were inome. It would give invest=8 a pee afford theciy lo .New Yot is a twab place to do uncapped, assessments rue and with dictableta rate and them commercial rents. Incentives creamd rvm as renutal income in. to From Port Washlnm to Seattle, for new offices became precarious, cream Thus. teants will be able #manwo baine and poiticd discretionary and nonexistent. as if look forward to lon-erm leseis with. leders repeat this pin, " it it were the answer to our contimaift need to am significati, naticipae- ein0K in. an WPAnc rimal ban of traditio not build for a future service economy creas baedan mandated tax b. tuft. Whtewr the relty, this MCI. was to build less This formula is designed to meet th our f MMe ai peti- We now face an economy fraught needs of the developer, the team and pa shop with uncertainUes. To survive the eco. the city without causing Veus mr. tlm w00hin an ihni slngy can- nomic instability of the 1980's. New tainty or crffice for any sector. tm belm mmumt. and we York must end its reactive crisis man- Finally. we must start to deal with omusbegintosoftemourawnugbmag agement and begn actively plnnuing thecrud mismatch betwe theavall- for a lo-raq, stable competitive able jobe within our n se rvice eco. wateu a useless bmucratic mn vti uonment. omy and the skills of our labor flrce. thtikrn cd deveoping teawa 0n1 ca no ker allow ou service in. educationallty8a resdo"m s/wYok pbpamstax=~lImlNW p~l geared reu touar First, te city Plamng8 Commis. W ftf ecoomilc needs. sm mM be rest"cture to reduce dustry to Import its work f e smply Based cc the once. taitles and vs. the average 12 mont of burmucratic became our citsens lack the skills to gaules of doing business in a city as tikern and review a project m. compete. The Board d Eduaon bigma New York, its reputati~nm a cey before it is certified for public must create training schools and pro. tmpace for busins.ispastybon 4'scains Our vital and democratic grams omred to aur new higb-tec oft o past as a city nm by crsi Num.a-us review procedur econmy. m e training rust remain intact. This procedure and manaemet and offek*ldM plamn8 for a stablemps v buI- Iv communities and city agencies progms must beexpanded. Without ix moths in which to evaluate fully these, eur public education will be- Eight yers a the wrld busm the mefts of any project through eL- come outdated and arcane. fmmdtywtcedorvay thase city Utive arinp betuw community We can no longer rely on slick teaoudin the edge of bankruptcy. boards, the City Planning Commis. promotional campaip such m '1 maIN 1g jobs. bsRinASs and sion and the Board of Estimate. But a Love Now York" to polish our image revemm. In the crisis, we played to lot of bureaucratic wrangling occurs While they are innovative and impe our sengtb: aur ftr as a bustnes8 before the review procs begins in- sive, tbme campaigns do little to smile economy. Real estate taxes volving many environmmal land. make New York competitive or to mark. tax ad nming Issum, and thm shape the economic realities in whid' were capped for five yas. The city our future lies. and state reduced or eliminted bul. should be s-eamdined into a single es taxs and created tax and oning Fqpr; mh e proedure, Without intives to aid the rnwruction of jeeP&Ising the Inerty of the ncu Andrew Stein is Manhattan Boot office space to house the whlteoliar rat pViom. This first stage should Preseat . Induties that would becme the be requied by law to take only sx hackbone of our future economy Iantis, educ&ng by almot half the March 20, 1983 WTANTED: IDEAS FOR NEW YORK QITY

S , .Acmmmtn_mmca I law, health. As America's economic baseh shfero m mamuting ow sMvie. New York has merged Was "Clearly, the city and the mon face premer service provider$r the wod. several years of further job losses, erod- Ironically. some of the vrny reas ing tax bases and increases independent cited to eqplain the city's econmic "de. population. But it Is certainly difficult to mise" are now re0spld a.-sAbe ascertai any acto the city could take among its Umiql m 1 -ina MrnVIO to avert or mitigate this downward ecrnmowy - lanet dmsy pecked pq ladoes ad thaMe That view of New York trm am ad 011" s- City. offed In lrMs in a frastr es tati mqpWt study prepared for the Joint them. As Meablw P. Dire- Economic committee of Con- nan, a prolossor of econom-. grm, reflected a common Ics at New York lUav ity, asumpton among urban ,theobemnt ecnomists. New York was MUnhattan's Borough PresidgLent b" -owod seen to be too congested. too are needced to te inuMd old, too big and too cumber- says Inew approaches speedy* cces" to otbrw - some to accommodate the nuti ure the city's growing ser e and busness Nam. demands of modern com- S tives. both for comunica- merce. The future, they said, onomy with its brokerage tion and for marketing per- would lie in more sprawling ks and communication firMNS. por. Frthor eidence of urban settings like Los An- the New York advantage: gles or Dallas-Fort Worth. He offers his own suggestiot Many of thn ds emrsd There is no denyingNeW cities oftntouted as t York's problems. That "do. urbanaum-e s of pO nt population 9 is g- future have bs m v in gantic and growing. Our New York's direction -wit- M.000elderly would cntl- ss the new subwayey - tute the nation's sevmth- tens l by San Francisco largmt city. TM umber of and Wahingto and th our citin living below the rapidtransit plans an- poverty line. Muned in the nmmcedby Houston. last census as $7.412 a year for a family Yet New York's turs I far hOWm as of four. ic greater than the entire popula- sued. We mut reo e the y i. tion of Detroit. The public-transportation udametally, en economic Mty and system has faced crisis after crisis, and that the success or failure of our em- the educational and criminal-Justice sys- nomic -lci will determine the qualty tens are under constant attack. of our lives. That mm e mN eeolMe Yet New York b confounded Its fiscal specific new programstotnurture a C. Long-trm debt service as a businessa-mmum"ty. prticr the percentapOf operating expenditures is service industri s upon wbich weIi. at the historically low level of 10 percent. c as"Sly dpe&It eWo e- two-thirds of the ratio of five quires tt we fid -ways years al. For the last tM n towinsdepend entMs fiscal Year. for example, the The4densely packed populatio and it o d obmwbr t 09t cT city bad a rlus. The on(ce some time.we used tod&- its huge transit system, 2 offeo -w apprMWMh IA tous Out, was not crippled vi iewed as among the cause such prolem areas as -ad tr meof critica Slow On,NowtYork City Ne1w York's economic woes 6are Mtrmlt has - more tha ,moM aid Is inemple!oyesib new jobs. an averag of na)w seen as competitive nearly 40,M peryer. n attracting growth comp LAS.iInwAt foosI have rame of growth, New Yok is Sgmm" wPlsofh- f m-gmff -- o only by *e Sum rp-iedp - at u Btcites of Dalls. Husmm rmrasove- wfowm Cya*m fmde d11mof lin and Los Angeles. MWatis . Wroed haemm--a mast signlflcant Of all, th odugSft. wo Its ia growth is happening in those lntrethat represet the ma Way from tdoedwof Wim future - iSbtmuweaming nation's economic to find -MWlchom ran finace, advertin trn- prdoblmothe mdsca

ANDREW STEIN, Manhattan Borough prident ~13~

our Uniform Land Use Re- day, an army of data proes commitments from the company - a Under Every tax rate to be renegoti- view Procerde, comnds and k y-punch operators ,claims low. 10-year sors, in the light of the company's city agencies are allowd six moo" payment cashiers, copy-machine ated the merits as to providing permanent in whichtowevaluate fully operatos and ma clerks descends record of extomive jobs. of any project by mean upon the comnmercial ad industrial hearings before community beie. parks of Lao Island. Westchester. the City Planning and New JerseY and Connecticut. They Ask almost anyone in business. the Board of Estimate. It is an ap- back-offtce make up the rank4nd-file from the hot-dog vendor on the corner preach that has proved itself. But be. staff of the service economy, process- of the Avenue of the Americas and fore a project is certified by the Do- for ing information, money and paper 54th Street to the head of the New pertinent of City Planning for the re- in New York the corporations located York Stock Exchange: "What's it like view procedure, it must pasthrough side City. They work out there side by to start a business in New York?" He a bureaucratic gantlet of challenges of with the employees of hundreds or she will tell you that it is tough - from various agencies on eniron- to the small businesses ancillary tougher than in other cities - in large mental, landmark, tax and soning food stores service economy, such as measure because New Yorkers have iu. Thin revew, often character- or office-supply shops. attitude to. lad by petty wrangling., takes an un- to an ingrained, negative Midtown Manhattan continues ward business development. ciIaomc -ble average of 12 monthe of virtually attract the central offices That attitude is summed up in the per project. once again. Wecantaf- every key component of the service phrase "Guilty until proven in- ford to throw such oadbloi in the economy, from communications and cent." and it has led to a daunting pat of comanies mei to mettle information enterprises to securities array of regulations embodied in beror tom eMlM; the Initial plang firms and banks. Howevor. though building codes ad land-ue revew procs ld bepimodwith a corporate hedquarters may polish -cM,lbr code and mall s agleImy. and thetime aowd the municipal Image. they do not rep. permits and reporting M- siould be limiteby law. to SiR resent the principal source of future quirements.Ma in an unco. jobs - particularly the semiskilled ordinated and duplicative fashion by jobs the city's residents most need. a hoss of omtmlssm, boards, cou. And New York City as a whole is los- bureaus. N w York leads the nation In the d- cila. agencies and versty -and arl -ar-of It ing out to our suburban neighbors in Consider the demands New York the competition for these jobs. pad upon the companies compet- tax sructur. It s-emsa ido. To a certain extent, many of the ing for the franchises for cable televi- signed to dicor a ew bimmnses business decisions to move back-of- sion. a key technoloical elmnt of from settlinghm. MWHo Incwludes lice and other enterprises out of New the ervlce-dominated economy. (To Plowrty tmeXI a ra0o00porau York City came during the mid-iW0's put it simply, cable transforms every mtxacoal pratiMta, a and early 1970's. inspired by cheap household television set into a poten- commercial occupancy tax pha a gasoline, inexpensive and abundant tial marketplace for everthing from host of minor. iSy bmi -p open space and vigorous "poaching" stock transfers to real estate to the ciflc smaller taxes. Now Yrk City campaigns by suburban communi- latest in fashion.) Ever since Manhat- also has the naion's IO Males uM ties. These decisions established a tan was "wired" for cable in IM. the (it puls retail ma to th doubae) precedent: It is hard to convince a city has been trying to create a mecb- and asubstantial pmonMaMinme tax corporation that set up its first data. aninm to allow cable companies into (it pushes upper-inme employee t processing plant in Hicksvlle. L. L., its other boroughs. What should have the.suburb. that its second such plant should be taken six or seven months for com- What's more, the city's built in Long Island City instead of pettive bids and approval has takes upon bisiness and mlae tmes leaves Hicksville. two years as the city has demanded us incredibly vulMrbwt the mtu- But as land and construction costs more and more paperwork and in. ation of the national bUsiMMSS cycle. rise and the suburbs increase their sisted upon additional programs of Some other cities rely more heavily tax rates to cope with a host of prob. dubious value. The cost to the compa- opertytams-inDomsfor.ex- lems suburban officials never nies has risen so high that it is still un- ample, they acc t for 70 percent of dreamed of a decade ago. New York certain whether New Yorkers. other revenues, xc ing state sad Fed- urban areas become City and other than those in Manhattan. will get eral aid; the figure forNew York Is 27 increasingly attractive. One recent cable television. percent. costs survey of construction and land Land-use regulation follows a simi- busimes at construc- Not only do we tax our suggests that office-space lar pattern. For instance, why isa my other tion in Brooklyn or Queens now costs a Iher rate tha vitually small restaurateur planning a side. city -- the avera company pays about the same as building in the sub- walk cafe of marginal impact sub- urbs. about $1,275 in tam pW year PW em- jected to the same extensive scrutiny ployee - but we also play favortm To lure those companies that do not given the most extensive housing Some office among thodiffetrnt iUtrl. require pnme Manhattan development of the decade? Builders taxes. like the n A space. New York should re-evaluate of large, expensive cosruction targtd on our most dy- the zoning of various areas outside tx, are projects can and do pay handomly -inc growthindusf. the city's center, particularly under. for the legal talent to shepherd a utilized manufacturing areas. The va- the moramof munici- Apparently, the notion in w project through m8 seors are cant and boarded-up warehouses that but a small entrepre- PrMd that these pal reviews. and can be maked for all dot the Queens shoreline along the unable to afford such expertise. "captive" neur. they ar worth. In fact, moms9of these East River ,area prime example of a is thwarted at virtually every step. location close to the midtown business "captives" have proved to be quite One result: Many small firms refuse me core that could e developed for back- when free, moving of their operatiom to locate in th city. or languish back- office activity. thsydo. out of the city and baldlngnew The city's land-development tools Itis not a result we can afford. office, service facilities elsewhere. In also include the power of condemna- all our jobs are with the long rn.themspecalizeddinmies About half of sUMn- tion and the right to lease or sell va. fewer than 100 em- u retard thep owt oour companies with addm the Impr- cant city land and municipal facill. pltes. To help mach companeas cope "t indutries and ties. New York does not lack for such Now York should con. din within the busInsecounmmity with city codes. city to the private land and facilities that would serve sider establishing a twoiered sys. that the in hostile the city better if developed for data- tem for some of its regulatory ac- sector. processing centers, information-stor- tions. An example of what can be ac- That im e n is heigheed by age centers, commercial parks and complIshed isthe Dermt of inequis within the tax laws. A the like. One example: the Brooklyn Buldin streamlined permit and prime xm l is the occupancy tx Army Terminal. where the city cur- program for small which is charged toownerswMho rent be. self-inspection rently stores its dilapidated buses renovations. Multiple inspections am ther comecil PM e wto other fore they are scrapped. required for large prolec by plumb- buinesma. The I mNIl BUS- New York should market such ers. elcrin and the lk. Bfut -l Mahim Corpolrato a the the properties by taking a Iaf from under thte~mlined program. the book of our commerial real-estate arch~tect for an Iilvldmd aparnmu Coany, aong ohers b on concerns. We might ease the comn- in eowere t vouch for the cond- Makdison An, anbIhheUmieoc,- res- mercial tax burden for corporate tio of te renovation; hs flicene In dents willing to locate their backof- forfeit Ifa;in fiImd t lhave mlestelnd eak t,, fiomwr, the FIet Dents. fice operation in the city, even pg Corpen whine roe~ helm ing such tax reief to nptiate the fact. S4 4 44 6.~8~t New York, says the author, should find ways to make vacant or little-used municipal properties available for development as data. processing centers or commercial parks.

ters is just a block sway from In addition, the Board of available to secondary-chool must be nurured. And there I.B.M., leases out some space Education should begin to students during the universi. slould be regular. routine r- in the building and thus must redesign secondary-school ty's summersession. evaluation and redesign of pay an occupancy tax. academic and vocational- 0 route to meat demogphic Such charges are inevitably training programs so that and otherchaeinthcity passed on to commercial ten- pupils do not waste their time When Harcourt Brace - a practice that has been ants in the form of higher learning obsolete and dead- Jovanovich. a major New more bonored in thbeich. rents, discouraging new com- end job skills. Metal-working, York publisher. annmmned a Criminal bemvior in New panies from settling in the welding and nautical train- year ag that it was moving York is not s prevalent as city and old companies from ing, for example, should yield out of New York City, the some believe; we rank 12th expanding here. One solution to programs that give stu- company becam the first among the nation's 2 largest to the problem would be a sin- dents the technical, mechani. corPorae emigrant to cite cities in per-capita crime. gle tax to replace current cal skills needed by medical the diminished quality of city Yet the criminal-justice Sy commercial and occupancy and dental aides, key-punch services as a key factor in the tm clearly must be Im- taxes. The level of that tax operators and graphic art. decision. The publisber said proved if Now York is to be would be set as a percentage ists. its employees could not rely perceived as a sale and so- of a property's rental income Some initiatives are need- n the subways and bus to cure place to live and Wori. and could be negotiated on a ed, as well. in bringing city got them to worka Ume. AUi Among our most pIn long-term basis, granting youth and the business com- the multitude of municipal neede are mo em't and owners a predictable tax rate munity into closer contact. services cotribute to the cant officialsso dta nme and tenants a constant long- There is apprehension on both quality of life, but ther are criminals are canabt they term rent. sides: Disadvantaged stu. two cmponens mO son- will receive rapid pih dents have no experience in tal to maintainin our ece- mnt; tody. it smeMtimes reform The reduction and dealing with the corporate iomic edge: public transpor- takes six months to a year be. of business-specific taxes world, and many business- taton ad criminal justice. forethey are tried. M umr, cannot, of course, be accom- men are reluctant to "take a New York's economy wmsd additmel jalspac; plished overnight. But it must thrives on densty, and that Judges a now loath to hand be begun, and an important chance" with the students. Work-study, apprenticeship mem it must have a trans- dwn stiff memn s because first step would be a greater and post-high-school place- portation system that can there is simply no rm for reliance on the property tax ment programs must be move mses of people offt- theenvicted. and other revenues that greatly expanded. ciendy. It is the only Ameri- Perape the most pmlar. would be less harmful to busi- The Summer Jobs for can city in which mre people sensitive to visible action however, ness and less ride mas transit to work wouMd be to put mor police pen. Yoth Program, established swings of the economic n the stree. The roalock dulum. by the New York City Part- than get then by car. But the nership, a group of 120 lead. system is no longer ad- in the way of such a step has ing business executives, equately performing Its job. be finding the financing, might well be duplicated by primarily because much of but two recent proposals There are some 3.4 million the schools. Under the pro Its infrastructure - tracks, offerin tandem. a solution. jobs in New York City, but gram, companies pledge to switches, elevated struc- On idea sugges tht col- about 600,000 of them are per- turnes, tunnels - and Its roll- lege schoahpbe offere men and women hire a fixed number of young- formed by ing stock are, literally, falling residents who would agree who do not live here. Some ex. sters for the summer. The part learn apart, victim of a legacy of that for thre yeaM after perts claim this pattrn is students who take but the chief deferred investment. grau they woUld petrol inevitable, that our growing some new skills, benefit is the socialization The M.T.A. plans to spend Now York strees for a very service industries will con- $5.8billion over the next five modest salary. They Would be tinue to look to the suburbs process - the changed per- of the years for capital improve- trained for duty during the simply because our residents ceptions on the part summers. To add 11,00 foot lack the requisite education businessmen as well as the ments on the city's public transport. Of that total,.2.4 atrolmen would m the city and skills to compete. In fact, students. billion is to be spent en new M million a year, or shout there is nothing inevitable More elaborate approaches should be encouraged. With subway cars and buses and. half the catof a similar com- about it. The education and the financial support of Citi- to a lesser extet. on a limited plmMM of regular city pa- skills can be learned if the bank. for example, the Board rehabilitation program. lice. The fudig fr such a city is willing to expend the of Education has put together That is exactly tM wrong program could be Fovds money and energy to make it tack to take. Rather than buy. happen. a curriculum aimed at devel- by modifying another Wis- oping skills useful in the ing new vehicles, the M.T.A. a -a-MIeek LPyrol tax, split lack New York does not banking industry. Similar should initiate a major pr- -tsoemplye and em- educational facilities, the programs should be devel- gram to overhaul and recon. ployee, that Would b dedl- central job.training sites for oped with other industries. struct its car and buses In its cated to a crimetrust fami the labor force of the future. New York might also profit w yard. This would save Th city woulm eve ome edu. Our public school system by emulating a Boston initia. ar anms that could be S million ama y, eAs cates about a million children tive announced last year spentoen the crucaltaskof re- to fud 10,0W goat oulmen a year. It is not, however, whereby the business com- building the system's crum. - with money left over for prepared for the changing de- munity pledged to employ a bng --h-sructure. Gven nw ownt -romand a mandsof the city's economy. minimum of 400 high-school the autmrity's plan to pu- start on somenw jails One problem is financial. graduates each year. on chain now cars from feip The dark days of Now New York spends an average condition that the school sys- nations. a recontr1 uctiOn pro- York's fiscal crIse have of $2.700 on each pupil, while tem reduce its dropout rate gram would offer another MMSinm "19. Tnhecity suburban Westchester, Rock- and improve its record in bonin, -rvinadditional is nolaeger national symbol land and Nassau counties providing students with read. jobs for its employees at of urban economic decline. spend an average of $3,500. ing and math skills. home. Yet Its reswgn has bean a The result: The small classes Though largely state-fund- Yet the bet-itentioned kind of unguided missile, and individual attention so ed. the City University of long-range plans are worth fueed by e ploMsiv groMt In important for working with New York still operates little unless the decline in tmes Mrvis and the disadvantaged city students under shared city-state direc- riders and revemes can be finalal dintry but without are enjoyed, instead, by mid. tion and could play a much halted. In the past, the au- signficawgovesmal di. die-class suburban children. larger role, working with the thority has paid all too little rction. As td othSr ci of Even in times of recession, city's elementary and sec- atnon to finding ways of d nation moe - reo- the educational system is not ondary schools. College stu- attracting new riders. The r- fully lotha~ icn the place to stint on the basic dents could tutor public- m proposal fotr a magntic me ra, 1Nw Yok will have reading and math' skills re- school pupils, for example, cad sysum to replace tokens Squcdmnits pam. Nm Is quired for entry-level poets in and remedial and enrichmmt is an mM of t eind of t tm o o nU#or da the service economy. proIams could be made - apoapm d t vMina ~bc~ A. Iuok-- SUNDAY, APRIL 24, 19 Business Forum THE PRC OF THE&TAKP Get Ready for Phone Bills to Double Service Commission, is tat "the IW- By ANDREW L STEIN vestment community will be scotl- WiAng this decion to esce.M N Jan. 1. iM. the telcommuni- 59 whether the company will be ingiad It as we know It financial condition an ePprOehM cations indutry diveitum." In esua, New Yut today will come to a swift and, Telephne a ety mM bhimer en the Amrican Telehom and divet tef of rvnes fromIsts cusmer to pe. Telegraph Company pare itslf!for divestitur. its 2 local opasting compNs. Much haa been writte about the Additimaly, the IMPOO Of IWvn- inynad oppor mes for the il Sys- inutdnc is the new lUUI ter onc Itit fredfrom the limits. thon imposed on its operatiomn and enters the ag of fm-whei competition. Unfrtmately. too little sensn o the ntional sad local been paid to the effect hat localMnm finr to mee tooqmt- divestiture will have on the average 085 c odOlesistanOfye Mm" ( 7.ential and busness wu of local tele0= n servics. And prelwmnary the aompantiefert taey are Ats financial material from local operas- Mwsraewhlr flocal s h servihepr- C-ng companies suuests that the hvmA.T.& T. brakup will be costly, in mie case tripling the average telephone bill. $ Wthewll be manis aalet aeby they a boot are of vaiSb The essental challenge for local isua sal l -- l stadt and rataaeting bodies is reguators Moreover,m1g cn aletost s, the valeseof loa of SW r evqt,Feehm .'clear: scrutini2e the conequence of offset the lanes of pot- An amy- ceived in the last 13 y a nuayin- u.rnm,th esawenno ea,k ispmd- the divestiture an local users and d. cas such an lon nw cusomer such a rate increase will inultw To wel- d t~ans Me 13p6future rate structure. to mitigate promises PqudpmeI a-It. crease the cos of the ayttto 70 par- anddt t etocloays. fthecot to average conumers. Most indusry mly tsm that the namer's bill by 50 pea co otnal In- To 1em thtat e rat e Following the - amimcmmntof the bulk of reve s will comei hm In. €n&. Combined with ap .allatom, ovrhle by th pemestla of CNeettlement between A.T.& T. and the crossed access chaoe sd IscreF d creas in deposits and I Jiutce Department them was no lack rams. Although A.T.&T. officials this rise in local rates amdpriem the divestiture, state -e-eata will have , .. f dir predictiore about the offect n calmly -su thehe p c tot reas telephone out of the marki tfor tosof to establish cleary their authooiy -i local rates. Federal, state and local tory authorities wll be able torn ac- thousads or elderly and low-income over thee issues and deleta poli- government agencies issued state. cans fees WO Mae to preea local New Yorkers. des that balance the Wlty of the e-mentL about the impdling immpact of rates, stats regulators san -ncm-sd settlen and the I -i - of the divestiture. The United States Sen- aot losing tir am anrlty In %TER states am hza similar xtshactog. ate's Commerce and Judiciary this ad other assa primril be. SPennsylvani tha sttlemt rt ill first asemrt their mnrl over ntra Nsrp5nels, the Howe Judiciary Commit. cause the -l of double by the Ritthst of tee and the Subcommittee on Tel. does not praAe fr hw Stat regl- sateaccess charges by i rat divestiture, increasing S mnftesd190 at a premium for long4-s- mc munincatt Comsumer Protec- tors wil set local rawt or acces million s year. according 'tion and Finance as waill as vanmas dharge. man for the state's utillto a se- ance opertors. To asur ther cm- ut mus state regulatory agencies ordered in- In the abeence of clear anwers or lom. A spokesman for S l, the agencies challenge my quines into the breakup. rgulaors to Delisaid that in anticipat of dives F.C.C. actiom that usrp their ablt specific actim by staM .dtof llfo. toN oltl mew. Some of these hearings have been asert their a rityover locl rte, titure the company expect Sto completed; others have yet to be Qnti- f Rgulats should am conslder us. the Dell oWaftg compdes wil not a 1 billon rate rise in late May,mor quir operatomr to phsiss4a ay cM ated. But for all the talk, no legislaeIon hesitate to seek raseetting decisioes than doubling its requas of a year ofdivestiture owrtwovtol0yearsto has been enacted, nor new rate struc- from the F.C.C. - undubely a ago. According to a spoke rtie easeste I enon she public. tures designed. And with only eight morn sympathetic ear. 1h. the pub. Florida Public Service C months remaining in the predivesti. mmtefo Fnally. they sho permit local op. lic will have forfeited valuable local the average residential f rac fortoeat a cram nm ture peiod. state regulatory action powers. The rmult could me trm Somhern Bell user is $10..N, but asa sources of rvnue such a it owan appears to be the consumer's only line nomical increases wi the masm . remdt of divestture and the recnt Dial-It services sad Yelow Pag By of defense against almost certain eral yes, dubling m Insome se F.C.C. decision raising loc,i alusers chars rmium for specal sev. "aning phone rates. tripling the cost of local taehpo fees for on-ldistance am Ice, the new im sch as call forwarding, radio When the telephone umbilical cord servicto the cinmer. rate will be S31.1. between Ma Bell and its local operat. pagan and cellular mobile telepho tig companies is severed, most tele- For example, according to testi. Thus predictions don't reflect the smetm heycouldalsobslpoffeetthe communications experts agree that mony by DwM Kello. Assistast true situation or the full innpact on the banslcofthatelepmo. the operating companies will need to Controller for the Now York Tele- umstaers. For instance, New York With diveetituwe sand the corner, raise enormous ammmts of revenue to phone Commy, the company my it Telephone, in its moss re ae raein. the tim to sctis am. And hw the will need 3.9 billion is addtional cream request, is seeking to maintain state regulators meet this challenge revenues by the end of 5115.That a 16.85 percent return on equity. Its will determine whether the 'lephone Andrew J. Stein is the Borough amomt alone is greater than all the explanation for the requesI, according remain means of o ication President of Manhattan. rate incre es the evnoany has ru. to its Brief on Exceptions to the Public available to evervww 0

ANDREW STEIN, Manhattan Borough President I bt iqeW Uork gimuo MONDAY, MAY 4 NM3

Letters M-Chosen Approach to Rising Health Costs

mne an milvidumi Pon h inmI- Fo ,mampl, V a hospital bum a Totbzdiur. - w in or pid:msam uCAT Thfie ehph uo WW mheW webw umm pups scmmr, It wll Usll be li t oP. win dim Ovt ts to a doctor wIl tONi thb depi service e Lbo vubmum carecommcmInaMe Op5imar- oded mmm dmmce, ticiebg Dr. 3rn0.Jh.M5I WithI do HamrSecualym in ,umsmf Lb DeurnImWof ,s m bmitwu pdy divide do OW ms 3mm Servic. be two am" a ume palimnp s3.16 fths: It' Wsmadltt w'tw1k to mhembl Lb hm to whiek tLby It's hir beme, lAMrN mNy arev m m r Other maem inmWa it pimm a - p r. w ly Dr. n m mw mdi- heavy hnm Gel car In Lb "weris lent" Is mt and Wl m. ady Sb wnWs Come to services they need *Lbso*Lb quite correeL lts spins expedIl Of thecngLir We rank 16t ft inm mMaft. It wmrt work became It is boned wm lab in Wwwwy. Tm o mim of the erommse Room dot hm camre ou ciam Po wMthM m trai. !,je ubonrpatatorn fals In p.m m -t simp bcom tLhy rns.t af- dmandbfl fad it. Yet our natiso i fis In the Dr. R at mmmr at two blls now w=ld In the 1e 1esp 1 8orm V. in Coqgeen void crete modve am moggefl for P11rw SamstbfIs imfiat Ou belth. ca Com. ad i is wt Lb m ap oflcur hnkb camJ.Js ow the ftm mmmpouldublrouIro bo wouldotMIs Iabes't ay. Lbovrm ard- hmdrpur in mat, tLb Proposal to tax ad elderly. Dr. ab2 m q" to health bmflt would rely farm mesdica Ps1 II m- o ver-m dismissthLb rofe.Lpowideklbho worker to negotiate for fewer and wbelam&g in -ae inwhich early do- emesatngcw.1bmlmhcarebath few ben to bep Lb Gow.- tection Is cruclal. this cot" be a ftal evidenca =mmn that it is wei gp wtulchplays thcacmilpart. mit rm takig bigger and blow decision. ik dollars aad ce dhip. bites ot of ther real home. That's dediib area m iam bemo What we have to do is stat not cost--- __ _ layeddlagnosis alien eadstothesd ping away at wht makes health car Andl It ishamd to Imie how h~gher fhr cue came iflat L cost o in this cmnry s eipmles, m mepayum wlwulvsam mdwueatmc mnely cut db -Wy L Govewn nmea is willin to speed for Utsc-ti. addeietfor an elderly pevo Tbe prlolm with Lb schoes is ms. do ot of tLM mnoilp on imeorfA&lnBt obadmtb. that they are based en tb fulty Wehave to attmck that coumer demand can problem: boarcresandpkysl- But he or d will pay five times as theory we muih for dot -wee Ip ay dictat the prim d belt cam They cia's fee. At the same tim 6 do not address Lbrl re lne must persevere in ow On3toW t m- foral bip: S1xKed pad overa so that -al ow ci i- Tis is mctly Le kind of devsmtng which is the profliate bebts l our health.care providers. If hme ils ms have adequate and afdable - costcpid that Medicare wm d. helthcare. ANMmw signedtopree are mcted. they wil increase the pr-patent ost o health cam, nt EqUmy ,mrn. both sChomes NewYork May L im would drlve up dedtwtibles - the "P.&ce It.

ANDREW STEIN, Manhattan Borough President I1

(c- 1983 News Group Pullcations Inc. Vol on, . 13Ila pMT, JUNE 3, 1983 AMERICA'S FASTEST-GROWING NEWSPAP111 Rent hikes should be modest again0

By ANDREW SWAIN Manhattan Borcmwh President

1HM annual mrn~.h iong s-metirres as high as 15 ,(' t.ay. of the building owner Is dLrpiay of di~laffei on he- per tent previously gl'.en *'.st ra.ea unmnacionabla tweeri the citvms -eni w&a to i&n-dlords when &n ,ge i-iart pay- Purtherincie Lnterg blilzed ternaafl 1-n U~weU &-.Artrnent was vas,:rat1 .;&rtrnent by rates fluctuaLe wildly landlords berms MVs iay S!roply1 pu.t. It was a tE)id .:.nd increeas from lending trutitutiwu when the Ren~t Gui e!:res Iac'ed giveaway thaI pro- per cent the to lending Institutiloft bor- Board takes public test- mocted tena~nt hs.-am- rtctof &Inowner'a op. ough to borough. and mony to deter-r.ine t-.ts rn ent. ~et dedicated nteighborhood to neigb- and fewer than year's rent lncreApie. The coasa a landlord Ln- tzO1,-,n p". r tenta burho4 Rut rnrr eiy recitl4 10 per cent of the city's Last Y.r, theae U) tr rx-letting his va. M-:LF~f the Nhuldinga face refiane- won g-1lcm cated &partient are ac- tenns ;Lncing La an iflg protima tat any year. concautlons - smnaller. CCIntj-d for in the pr.rvey every :n 6 t-c h e- To cornjtert~ate than-average rent 'I-r hnd a c-'A-ner with acrvas-the- and an end to creases the *1-. ar-i c, n-. n o b~iiird increasm would allc'%snces. vacancy PrvVer Addg a vs. f Dr a host of hurt landlords who pay C~caya~iuc on *-tV of But even these im- 1 .rv of %l,'ch higher-thazi-average Wn provementsi n rent equity thi ts utplain d- ,.b.e- ieleI,- %hith tomft rates and unrwa- etA Ai' may be eroded this yeAr .of sraily profit thirme who In the rush to ccompenSaLe don't -ftnance ce who r- nt r 1: building owners for the t - :- - ifs pay ;cwer-tltan-averax? tne rl v r -- incrtaxed mawt of refi * .-- - nC. 1.r *C.req rate&. nancing rnortgageL - nt T he mct equitable Way n e However, If the Guide- . o r'1s Vo 4ddrezs the question is lines Board ia to we faijr Fk-,n,,%a at c i ed -..c 'eia to develop a mechanism rents for the corning year. rJnprove- at the Conciliations and Ithe 'urrnt Appea.1s Boar to comn- three key fartors indicate In the past. '.he txm&rvi of MLdest ation Liystem, penata an individual another round ~.stida %aranc-v allzrw- rent ritees is i order. -aLiveev owner when he refs- r-eas one way to -oin- t-me , y rances his property. The F~riut. the incrct"s rg Fwrsate o'A-re?-z for the be airriilai rent qta- nen'a -- fur- pmreaa could Cfnsts of c:,u-rdng iin -if r-frtna.--ig !heir at c-to' irue to the CAB*@ procediares bil!zed iip-Arment tid- %.o; d: p^ A !upJl.v thie zr-r.FVe- for :wrdshlp and capital- ings - to ae b.'I~t sjinc' for Ck nrpen- Imnpr-uvement rent in- or older ap)Art --r'ts V otn g to do w! th 2947. creases re~'dby Lban- no longer ofmony-~ e ~the This owners who cunuoi t(l. 6 --it-±P- -isy. rent i--ueJly !ace the difficult this Ye~Ar. t_%ir4 c~~ ::6 -,*- ston of refinancing , er ent C- i t-. '-At -. vn rr-nt-yubsllzed !,s will re--'elve

-4 2;1A7~ burdening .PrtAL -- _ite the b-Ulyhoo no C)p. *'hecxwt of mortgage .. 4 aE e'jufty die- fe ?*!z~ yeax's rent f kw-,- the rnod-

o a~ I-i - jq I U r .- :Borough President ?4UUSAd. 196 UPTMUEB,1. Let's give the to the people By ANDREW STEIN ManhattanBorough Pdt

Ulm heqin a" TH3 RMCKNT rmfgma- oeaI AwrIf atll teM owisnmow am tions of Richmrd Ravitch kqth, me gmcy do- and John Simpson pre- 197? was quit as NO theelft e dm 49 m~ ent Gov. Cuomo with a roul~les hrAaD the money M It wIN s40 prime opportunity to ima make the unwieldy bu- take $4 milm o 60W limm vease reaucracy that runs our ptete the two Muim ad The endo car110a s subways. buses and the program d Qo trains more accountable Trunk Us Md the Se- to the public it is man- ond Avemau submep. dated to serve. In wUL the VIA Da d CIO mad -A& car -d lgsbm- adsal For the past 15 years. ,aed to FORns te It has been the particu- orde Is the sydem's 15 vn tdo cl~n the lar misfortune of New MTA's five year plan die- thow :4 them Id M York City and Its metro. yew hlmH , n "3 . carded the sowiloi0 of poliltan area that its sin- way am W"t UN106- - m - ~ M~ gle largest public ser- the aed il their UeAOw~ thewean' syte vice, used by nearly 5.5 hun - I noamle Oft In fter of Is- million people a day. is T1m wo So 010MO vmeInIa wdplum utterly outside the pub- that tic's electoral control. ms chas My nWe bmW Of the and the result has been York ty to we the cars med bipt edgtW, - ed uba"MMeFV devastating. mamgaetwer to me The di1epWie e This August. an a re- -ag wort as mil- taem whtthe sy100100 117 - sold.. sult of seriously deterio- lion, about hao of the ad rating subway tracks, 0o of the original purchase. ica hang 1ther ur- percentof the system's Bt the prim t VU trekua beA ed M subways were either late -~paidM r 9 mV eduthefge or cancelled. The aver- dacepalm"by compvari- age time for a ride In- sOS to the Mletwide devas- sme SDbelMeon th1a Ow. creased 30 percent and tation the board man- thy a Contedaitn the number of collision* dated when It voted to cut By so own m d mmdwhmsnofth or derailments rapidly pre ve abwa car approached record num. maintenance In MS dur- vam nm themit e bers - 13 since January. lasg the city's fisd criss. fo amanYofive to But the recent track Traawore bte md n reai its tedandMiU maor w thevro crisis is only the latest in were cancelled with in- mlokm hawIn It nooko the 15 year legacy of creasing requmy. Dy for Wooud. elevated bm daily wdin Of the MTA unaccountabUity. January 13 a average 3ye ftIM 90100ugr FMm the stmat. the of 430 cars a day either 411leth IrA Board. out cf touch novr left terminal or to reitthat the at- = with the system's needs, woke down In mld-roue fa1= tWc ~ ingwll set out on an ambitious and were emoled - a now routes building pro. condion that 001d take Inerllmisand an gram, even though the manthw,five to swee alutdeteloratim In system was beginning to years to be remedied. service. Nor does it tame -n Ofmlor theI deteriorate from neglect The riil p c -ems much Insight to predict,

ANDREW STEIN, Manhattan Borough President W at, 4 tt jjrlk Ebuntlz

NEW YORK, SATURDAY, FEBRUARY A8 1984 Preservation Laws Should Apply Equally By Andrew Stein and Lynn Forester Stein

The New York State Legislature is be involved I t otelcton oeit at- glmognt tiom s nrely unwar- serlosly comsiderig a measu that chitectural treaauus. ranted. would strf a body blow at the ability Ou ems have repeatedly hl The First AmedmutdoesnolvTe of the state and city to prsee ire that WO&m -~itos -n a oraiatlon a uii to so- -UM architra lazdmaiks. laudmark p ra, a a i-. slp IS commercial activity Ito The popo111 legslatin which has mate ue of govenal poweu Abiding by th esn reguiatim tha acured rgm beca9e Of the lbs publics hitrest in;p tng ir- replaceae art ad rid- Vmm others. mrew, l dispume over St. Dathlae's a.Sm -_-au-imtm ae -jec to an aw Cnch In New York City, is designed mands p k ft" of deci m to motolawsicludgingaetd to prohibit the application of amy local change or destroy mach resmae health mnd safty n fatum.it is landmark prvation regulation to Landmarks laws perM = pub- meclabl to~ maiutat corn- property owed by religin orani- lic volm t and, at the mse mriactivity Is tIaatmIm 1ls mums without their conm. Its sup- time, ane rmive to e nes and ius eqnon becume th pm portes otend that the landmark interests of the poperty ownm In aeds from a commercial red e presrvation laws, applied to buil particlar, fth rst landmarks de-lopmm will be ueil to e2ms ings Wed for religious puoes, vio- laws provide for relief incases of te actMie of a refllgn erp - late the pbibition agalzut state in. hards*. tin. AUl owners of comeil real tefto with the free mcise of The debate mrtding the pr. Ssmuld play by tMe same rules. religion guaranteed by the First po ede tion has revealed th As the United Sta Suprmu Court Andment of the C406titution. very serious and legiti m t problems sold tn 1=: "When followers of a However, the public's lnterest in facing religious rainizat om .How. amtimdsr ect m comm imal the uandm disposition of valuable ever, New York City's "hrdship" activity as a maer of chaice, d landmarks reqires a mechanism to provision isdesigned to address this limits they accept on their own cna. insmurethat invaluable architecture is isue. For mmple, the New York duct as a matter of cuclec an not Wcm ately sacrificed for City Landmarks Commission found faith are not to be prp d o comm etrca gain. Landmark laws hardship with r to popety the statutory schemes which an provif Just much a mechanism. owned by achurch In the Fort Green binding an othe s in tha activity." Two immutable prtioe suld Historic District and, on an edited Landmark Vrienva and raw govern the debate ovw any legisla- bads, authorind the demolition of S-M ,qpMMM alliGes nt a- tion that woud limit lindumars. the church.owned buflding. The com- mi. The protection of both Is a vi- pregulatiom. First, lad mission's recent decis with re tally important goal. We can, wth marks prese .-ation sol cotin spect to the Mount Neboh Synagogue sympahyf, undaI-anding and ecorn. to be recognized as a proper and and the Marymount School reveal omy, administer our iandmar highly desirable functim of govern- that a workable procedure is In place prwee ton laws. Be mr land- ment. Snond, the treatment of com- and the opporttmity for relief mists. marks am too mclum to pemit mercial dev e should not dif- inboth cases, the commiM al- irdetrction withou public ecr. fer because of the identity of the lowed the institutions involved to al- tiny. The beauy of our landmarks owner or the purpm to wthch the ter their structures so they cold re was Ingly mn Care u created; 1ly it profits from the commercial activity main economically viable. vnwt be lingly and carefully pme- will be put. Of course, we can and should Im. served. Public policy and legal precedent prove our laws and their administra- support the use of giernment regu- tion where necessary. Fair and equ - lation to protect landmarks. The table administration of them isnot Andrew Stein is Menu ston Borough blanket exemption that wmld be impossible. But a flat prohibition president. Lym Forester Stein, a ntedreliguorguam by against public partIcipaon in ded. lawyer, is a member of the Maudcipal the ropse leAslatio is a direct slons affecting the preervation of de- Arts Socety, a civic nganiztlode- challenge to the right of the public to struction of buildi owned by rel- voted to lanmrku p rvatior.

ANDREW STEIN, Manhattan Borough President

NOT AT GOVERNMENT EXPENSE. The Rent Guidelines Board a ppoe nee:I rent- apertuWONblzs effective October 1, 1983 to Sept nber.^0 190*,, Thea-Iid.Unes ai ethe same as last year; 4 percent for a I year lea and 7 percent for a two year lease. For tenants whos electrdity 1i Mudel lit the t%' ,(StIM 1 w6 .Ad Peter Cooper Village) the guidelines are 3 percent 'for a I yer lea*e and-6 percent 16r2 year lease. Due to a law passed by the state legisature the three year 14ee provision has been eliminated. Units renting for $200 or less, in addition-to the mandated increases, will batve-a $10 monthly additional allowance. Rents in these units are not to exceed $208 and $214 for a I or 2 year leas respectively.

The RGB has also approved a three-tiered vacancy allowance ranging from no increase to 15 percent depending upon when the last vacancy occured. I am encouraged by the Board' decision on the basic guideline of* .and 7 p t because the cost of operating a. rent stabilzd building increased only slightly above last year. But re-imOslni- a va alO~ance is unjustified and gives landlords an incentive to harass existing tenants to move., .m CIA~ REM I The state legislature recently passed legislation which would allow the City Council to authorize cash paymnt to landlords whme Senior Citizen Rent Increase Exemption credits were greater than their property taxes* SCRE alows seAor citizens, 62 or older who have annual incomes of under $10,000 and pay at !et one-third of their incomes for rent, to apply for exemption from further 'teit increases. The landlord gets a property tax credit for the amount of the exemption.

The New York State Supreme Court ruled the program to be unconstitutional because in some cases rent incresem emption amounts were greater than the property taxes, thus depriving the owner of rightful income. The City Councilpow has to act for the program to comply with the court order. You can help by writing your council representative and urging them to support SCRIE.

BRINGING THE LANDLORDS TO TRIAL In October 1980 1 filed a class action lawsuit, along with the New York State Tenant and Neighborhood Coalition, charging the New York City Rent Guidelines Board with violating the spirit and the intent of the Rent Stabilization laws. The suit contends that, when it sets annual rent increases, the Board doesn't fully analyze all the economic factors that determine the profitability of housing. Instead it analyzes just the annual increases in prices for goods and services, only one factor in the howing market. The case is now moving toward trial and I am confident about its success. A fundraising effort to support the continuing legal battle is now underway.

IF YOU HAVE A HOUSING PROBLEM, CALL BOROUGH PRESIDENT. S S HOUSING UNIT FOR ASSISTANCE - 566-41050 -over- During the 1983 session, the State Legislature revised the Emergency Tenant Protection Act (ETPA). Some changes are pro-tenant; others are pro-landlord. The major chwvges are described below. If you have any questions or any problems with your landlord, call the Borough President's Housing Office at 5"-105. STATE OPERATION OF RENT CONTROL AND RENT STABILIZATION On April 1, 1984, the State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR)r will begin administering rent stabilization and rent control. By July 1, 1914 landlords must register each apartment's rent with DHCR. This will establish the initial registered rent. A copy of each apartment's registration must be sent to its tenant. A tenant has 90 days to challenge the initial registered rent's legality. Landlords found guilty of willfully overcharging after April 1, 1984 will be liable tr for damages equalling three times the amount of the overcharge. nDHCR will also enforce the laws against tenant harassment. Landlords found guilty of harassment can now be fined up to $1,000 for the first offense and up to cO $2,500 for subsequent offenses. APARTMENT SHARING In May, 1983 the State Court of Appeals ruled that landlords may evict unrelated tenants sharing an apartment without the landlords consent. The Legislature subsequently revised the law to permit one additional occupant (a person not on the lease nor related to the tenant) and the additional occupant's dependent children. SUBLETING AND ASSIGNING The revised ETPA explicitly gives tenants the right to sublet their apartments and prohibits landlords from "unreasonably withholding consent." If a landlord unreasonably withholds consent or does not respond to the sublet request, the tenant may proceed with the sublet. However, a tenant's lease may not be assined without the landlord's consent, even if that consent is unreasonably withheld. Defining "good reason to withhold consent" has been left to the courts. TENANTS OF NON-PROFIT INSTITUTIONS PfOTECTED Tenants in buildings owned by non-profit institutions are now covered by rent stabilization. Institutional landlords are now prohibited from evicting tenants to use their apartments for residential purposes if (1)the tenant has occupied the premises for five years and had not been informed of the institution's right to evict, or (2) the tenant had occupied the apartment prior to the institution's ownership. OVERCHARGE APPEAL DEADLINE Tenants who suspect they are being overcharged should file a complaint with the City's Conciliation and Appeals Board (CAB) before the April 1, 1984 State takeover. Currently, a tenant whose complaint is verified may recover all overcharges. After the State takeover, a statute of limitations will prevent the recovery of overcharges made more than four years prior to the complaint.

ANDREW STEIN, Manhattan Borough President Andrew M4bWst'ns Newsletter

DIESTITURFA WHAT TO DO? On January 1, American Telephone & Telegraph will divest itself of its operating companies, including New York Telephone Company. AT&T will be responsible for long distance calls and customer premises equipment. New York Telephone will provide local calling service. The divestiture will radically change our telecommunicatiorn system. The divestiture's effects on local telephone rates deeply concern me. I recently completed a study indicating the telephone company will need $2.9 billion over the next two years to pay for this process. Telephone officials predicted local rates could more than double in the next three to five years.

Telephone customers, however, have various options for cutting their telephone bills: 1)Buy your own equipment - Most customers currently rent their equipment from New York Telephone Company. However, equipment, as well as future rental fees will revert to AT&T. Now, customers can own their equipment by purchasing it from AT&T or other telephone companies. You can thus avoid the monthly rental charges of $4 to $12 for standard equipment. You will recover your investment after several years. However, once you purchase the equipment, you are responsible for its maintenance and upkeep. Theref ore, purchase high quality equipment, so costly repairs will not be frequently required.

2)Survey the Long Distance Market - As of January a, long distance will no longer be rovided by New York Telephone C'mompany. Thereafter, consumers will be able to choose amongst a variety of providers of long distance service including AT&T, MCI, SPRINT and other carriers. Thus, for the first time, there will be a competitive market for your long distance dollar. The best advice is to shop around for the best long distance service that will give you the service you use or need at the best possible price. 3)Use local Telephone Directories- Directory Assistance charges, for both local and long distance service, will increase as services are priced on a competitive basis. Therefore, consumers should seek to obtain telephone directories from the counties they most often call, so that operator assisted directory service can be avoided. Telephone service will be changing significantly as of January 1. Consumers, however, have the capability to hold down their own rates by shopping around for the best possible service and equipment. Now that competition has entered into the telephone industry, we should take advantage of all avenues of service.

ACCESS FEEPOT NE The American Telephone and Telegraph Company had proposed to charge all of Its customers a $2 monthly access fee- no matter how much money they spent on long distance calls This charge could rise to $6 per month at a later date. After months of discussion, however, the Federal Communications Commission has decided to put the new fee on hold for at least three months. Hopef ully, we, along with other telephone intervenors, can convince the FCC to reject the proposal, and base all residential long distance rates on actual usage. This monthly -charge is unnecessary and unfair to the telephone ratepyer.

HOW TO COMPLAIN ABOUT YOUR TELEPHONE B I STEM OPPOSES NY T.EL'S $1.1 DILUON MRATE INCEASE

the New York State Public Service Commission August I, 1983, New York Telephone asked summer, is On most of which would become effective next for a $1.1 billion rate increase. This increase, the first post-divestiture increase. intervened in the proceedings to telephone rate cases, I have formally 22. As in the last four Manhattan. Hearings began September interests of the people of the Borough of gathering represent the New York Telephone Company's figures and utilities consultant has been questioning My rate increase is unjustifiable. witnesses to convince the PSC that this company's increases within reason. For been successful in keeping some of the telephone New York I have to keep the pay telephone rate at 10 cents. the past three years, we have led the battle defeated of a pay call to 25 cents, but we have successfully Telephone has tried to increase the cost this increase. the lat of municipal consumers which fought Last year, we helped organize a coalition company only half result was that the PSC gave the telephone telephone increase request. The final of what it wanted. are by a New York State utility. The following year's increase request is the largest sought This on them: highlights of the increase and my position telephone Telephone Company is seekinSa 30 cent pay PAY CALL - This time, the New York million. I want to rate in the nation, yielding an extra $186.9 call. This would be the highest telephone will still be able to call so that those who cannot afford a home keep the 10 cent rate. communicate with the outside world at a reasonable telephone customer gets three free ASSISTANCE - Currently, the residential request. DIRECTORY then charged 35 cents for each successive Directory Assistance calls, and is monthly calls monthIy wants to reduce the allowance to two free In this rate case, New YorkTelephone I oppose any increase in for any additional requests to 40 cents. and increase the charge any telephone directory from the Assistance charges. Remember, you can obtain Directory your local business office. phone company free of charge just by calling wants $52.6 million more for connecting CONNECTION CHARGES - New York Telephone the actual new connection charge totals $132, excluding telephone service. The proposed This increased to $18by consumers paid $8.75 to have service connected. installation. In 1970, I oppose further increases; average has increased rapidly since (it is $98.25 this year). 1975 and the cost of a service connection. middle class consumers can now barely afford the telephone company is seeking .a late PAYMENT CHARGE - For the first time ever, LATE one month late. The Company wants to assess payment charge if payment is more than bill is on all unpaid bills at the time the next telephone customers a 1% percent late charge the amount owed lessone which would be charged as a percentage of prepared. This charge, and business customers. I oppose service charge, would apply to both residential month's local accounts come from major business customers this charge, as the largest share of delinquent rather than residential ratepayers. increased wire charges, are many other issues in this rate case, including Of course, there and higher private line costs, I will be local message calling, higher exchange rates, increases for I hope to stop the increase from taking effect fighting all these increases over the next six months. in its entirety.

WHO IS THE PUBLIC SERVICE COM and how it operates. The PSC wonder who makes up the Public Service Commision Many people for setting rates for electric, tele , water, utility rates in our state. It is responsible and regulates Of course, it is also responsible for insuring safe and gas companies'who do business in New York. adequate service. Thefor terms.Governor There with are the noState acttml Senate's quimlications approval. membersThe PSCserve has for seven six members,years, with appointed staggered by the two seats for consumer representatives. membership, but the last two Governors reserved its business. Its rate awarde haove Wee I am unhappy with the way the PSC has conducted to the interests. An elected PSC, directly accountable excessive and contrary to the consumers' best people would serve us better. ANDREW STEIN, Manhlattan Borough President WITH CITY SERVICES HED HELP? HAVE A PROULEM S OFFICE- CAL D..OKOIGH P3EDt I E TEl 4 0li~ 689 0 (Iblecuj~d~w SUNDAY, APRIL 8A 133

THE OF THE AT&T. AKUP Get Ready for Phone Bills to Double

My ANDREW J. VMTIN

~Jan. 1. 194. the telommul-. cations ndustry as we kow it today will come to a swift and. OutosmbW j Telephone and Eassincreae when the American Below are.recet rate Telegraph Company divests itself of reqieste by the Ne"wYor 1.250 ,is 22 local operating companies. I~.k f-Inmnanw'I Mum I Much has been written about the I1the company's proected revenue ehortall myriad opportunities for the Bell Sys- for 1984 and 1985 tem once atis freed from the limita- Figures an millions 89 879 tions iTnpoed on its operations and the age of free-wheeling Source New York SewIConsuW enters ProtectionSard. ,,w YoM, S competition. Unfortunately, too little Pubkic Servi cweC on~ and local ,ttention on the national 381 level has been paid to the effect that divestiture will have on the average residential and business users of local telephone services. And preliminary financial material from local operat- ing companies suggesta that the breakup will be costly, in some cams Aug.NM. Ma~h eb. Y Adl 19 t tripling the average telephone bill. The essential challenge for local regulators and rate-setting bodies is clear: scrutinize the consequences of the divestiture on local users and de- ea year.doubling andin somecase amfidence In the neW local operain sip future rate s:nactures to mitigate of local tolephm campaneis an as yet umnemred average consumers. tripm the cm a the cost to WOWcto the CoMOumr. CoM. &u invtment Services are Following the oncement of the rmdyc stia wareye. Last month. settlement between A.T.& T. and the For example, acorM to tet- Mody's domgaded the bond rating Justice Department there was no lack mon by Dwig Kelg AsM of mnodeOpratiu Cmpme-- of direpredictions about the effect n Contror fhr the New York Tele. mostly from Ma to AsL. As a result, local rates. Federal. state and local phM Compaytecomp aysIte i local rats will rise to met thmeperat government agencies issued stat. will need a.$ billion In adm i ScompameN' oher cost mof ny ments about the impending impact of rvemms by them d of II. Tht and invesurwinl become even more divesUture. The United States Sen. mnmm aimm I greater tha all the Mical of the financd s Uty of Judiciary nomemyhas re- ate's Commerce and rate inrM the the co me after they are divested panels. the Home Judiiary Commit. cav in thelast 13 Years. Momover ffm A.T.& T. tee and the Subcommittee on Tale. such a raencraewill pobalyi- The cost of locl tele service communications Consumer Protec- creasethe costof fthe&Vera&e COD- will be affected by a host of other and Finance as well as varim pems to 70 pr- tion mer's bil by 30 wIsusmowll - depeiation sched- state regulatory agenciesodered In. cent. Combind with a pmualwI- ule. the valutrure eqip. quiries into the breakup. craee in deos and amlaoms, -m .the assgmiM ofbook-deprec- Some of these hearings have bee ths rismin iocrates cmld prim the atom mermm. leain ara- t completed; others have yet to be Inii- tkpbio of the market for toms of anddsixtramfr, to cite olya few. ated. But for all the talk. no legiaton th lsandor eldwrly aN low-Incom To inaure dt commes are not has beenenacted, nor new rate struc- New Yorkers. omwhelmd by the a cm f tures designed. And with only eight diveotte sate mulators -wlhave in the predivesti. monthe remaining TTHR States are in a Similar t establi clearly their authoi ture period, state regulatory action ave th Immuesad ddelinete po- only line end. Pmyv ratem appears to be the consumer's fifth yearof de that balans the integWy of the against almost certain doble by dt of defense divestiture. incremmingnearly Im Settlement and the Interm o the imnring phone rates. a year, accovdin to a spoes- 9,hen the telephone umbilical cord mlml iocatsiphoeconm mFWfor the Stat's utility commis- The kd relatory agmies mmm between Ma Bell and its local opemt- sion A spoesan for Souhwesuu fi assertthr cnrm-i over mire- companies is severed, most tel. ilg Dell amd that in acipto of dives- Omft c s hmge Wby settigSrat commumcations experts ape that and fem sat a premium for ln4i- will need to ue timhecommy ee te fileor the opwerating companies May, more tame operatorn. To asmmurtheir con- amounts of revenue to a 1 billion rate rie iM late raise enormous tmn doubling ts requM of a Year tro, the agies must chamu any offset the loss of profIt-making serv- ao. Accordhttoe pokumn hr the F.C.C. actim that usu their ability ices such as long lines. customer Florida Public ervc CommSWio townlolcalrte. premmises equipment and Dial-It. resddenal flat rat for Regulano n mb alscmlder re. mte the the ave Most industry analysts that SoAhern Dll mrs is810. buta a bulk of revenusewill come from in- q rl, oeatws to ph asmlwyst rit of di imm and the recnt of di'e IvMer Itl to years to creased access charges and Increased F.C.C. decsm raslng local worm' ese '-Iinmthe p~c. rates. Although A.T.& T. offidt" ftes r l weasdncsevice, te new Fleelly. they elmid permit local op. calmly assum the pulic tt regua- ratewillbe l.8. creite MW able to m ac- oaigcomapaes to tory authoritis wi be rlet te aemmoeso eviemmiech as intswn cm fees high amugh toprc locl 11m wedPrm don't Dd-lt services and Yl PN . By rates, state regulators tnsi tatlmOnrthe fUll ImPMaethe about losfu their own authority in cn.or For Imne, New York icesm a cell -foraeng.a ldlo i this and otherareas, pmari be. Telpn ItI mosmcun rat pon and cealul a modle l me caume the language of the eulemm aame req;;;is semsig to maims does nt - frhl hew stat.regla- a 146.5pn en euey l. eIs mem~imeame tonWill m locl ratoesWorm charges. WisDrie m Knpim ft dtl do Um to It s s . And heW the UmserieCoo is .at ma-s e cera a or Inthe absen of vsmen uimmimty wil be seawi specificacton by state euh to mlmis decisio toascerteim gull IN IN I m ob a rt their authrity ow ocl M wm companyWill bela soemi wnWaeMs awabbleteveryw'ed tohe operating MlA" A A-NtIm taIppeches hesitae to seek rate eutt cim of"ia ED lim le or , from the F.C.C. -a ss""eOtbu m y-m - ,miPeOer .aa I ~gmisnamiy -hem he aminmrs to Paw Andrew J. Sub es' . POWe Teorll el -n oa. A1 7.the ise1pantd Invef11r Pueslmi lmlon. @NOW bm sWIN *@MW- iN(]IS311d HflOIlOG NVWUVHNVW N131S M3aaNv

p q qBg UD 10 elqnop lo oqd

.jlo SND UDD Wfl4.450M.p AekoqM

,OOS "A'N 'WOA MIN 0N0401"M llWdli=iflW 01108 Important news concerning the Telephone Company dive mu,1mU.- re tbat will directly affect you.

N JS iUNV

"Of-99C $e ow a M aid 'noA o ! jo aq uu i ;1 "s4aoJddu OaJMlSOAT.P s n;djqI1! Pub noA ado4l ! OJfmC!,sA^.p pu soe i a uoqdola uo uo!$ewJou! osql*41 noA Op!Aoid !Jm, smu .yqJ, •aa ow a"&pqJo .uow put Oaj!nslA!p O45 UO )UaWUJOAOD (IJOa 415 41!M s1uoww O POI!Pluoqd OM 'OJowJ041Jf. "IUP Aled o ou01 a Su!AOS u! popooons put s *leia uoqdola. 1)AoA maN Jno; ela% u!. polimdplrJd isJzeA Auvw *o;saoeJ puB a3T!JaS auotdalaljo ns T041 U!•dn)paJq poAJOAU! A1 A uOq 0WA4 I J.ipiV 41 ijo;aq l .Ipm n Alap!AM iuawdmnba pU SOAJaSse Joa30!otp A4^I ll!M sJauoWsf:l) ";k!AJaS a m s$p %*I put luaudilba ssvwad Jawolsfl) I.p!Aoid dols nq 'aO!AJU ouoqdaja$ 0JOlIuiplAoid anuluTo lI&A auoqalj )JOmaN jadwvxa o! "4OVU tp ll!M%SO!AJOS UMJ:) Jo JOP!AoJd ,04i pue ewJoJ 11!q auoqdala 'saojoauoqdala$ 'owes aq uuuwoa Allf J!Mlm,Ua ;O AJ OuoqdMio qOnoq1 "AJOVISu4 Pn! u! saue aU.4uaJdwoo put p!deJ sow oq~ olaoptunL U1I/ JJ Anisnpu! suo!t.tunwwo oqi " l$If• 4flmSOp44WlI AjvnuwC uo Jnwo IIIMa0Mj a$ G! a lP JOIO i VUoWdIlOL UUWJOWV a4 put 'SwTJjvq '0DAJag l oodojoi 3noqe S3ujJdWOO LUew PDAOOOQJOU4I a# . 40

PRESIDENT O7 THE BOROUGH O7 MANHATTAN CITY OF NEW YORK NEW YORK. N. Y. 10007

ANOOMW SYCIN

January 2?, 1984

Mr. William H Ransom 115 E 87 St, #14e New York, NY 10028

Dear Mr. Ransom, I am writing to invite you to join me at a community meeting which will consider the question of whether the Upper East Side Historic District should be extended from 79th Street up to 96th Street. Date: Sunday, February Sth Place: The Dalton School 108 East 89th Street (Between Park and Lexidnton) Time: 1:00 PM

You will have an opportunity to present your views as well as listen to the comments of such people as Kent Barwick, Chairman of the Municipal Art Society, Preservatloeat Brendan Gill, and Gene Norman, Chairman of the Landmarks Preservation Commission. Councilwoman Carolyn Maloney will join me in cosponsoring the event. The issue of extending the Upper Last Side Historic District is of enormous personal importance to me. My wife Lynn and I live in the area and both share a strong belief that the area from 79th to 96th has unique architectural characteristics that must be preserved. There has been a tremendous amount of development all over the East Side and it is important that the low density and the striking facades of many of the buildings be preserved against further encroachment. If you are unable to make the community meeting but would still like to keep informed of what we are doing on the issue of historic preservation and the extension of the Upper East Side Historic District, please return the enclosed paid card to me. Please call Laura Toole at 566-6237 if you are interested in making your views beard at our community meeting on February 5th.

Sincerely,

ANDREW STEIN 1IT3M YTIAUMMOC" PUO NAM 't ...... a f QA s

* d >j~ NO POSTAGE 4 ki 11 NECESSARY II G IF MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES COME TO OUR COMMUNITY BUSINESS REPLY MAIL MEETING T DG-v FM 0DaTWMIPOQ fIirst Ci" hrmit No. UO. mW Yodi.N.Y. EXTENSION OF THE UPPER EAST SIDE HISTORICAL DISTRICT Postage will be aW byd isem

Mr. Andrew Stein DATE: Sunday, February 5th 1 Centre Street PLACE: The Dalton 8choot New York, New York 10007 101 EaM Oft Street

TIME: 1I:0 PM eQ~teeeeeeeeee te9 . ****** * 0 **e0 * * * 0 .* i:!AMISO.N...e0T 0 TICKeeeseETeK ADMISSION CAN'T MAKE OUR COMMUNITY .. ET. e000000 0 0 0 00e0 ...... RETURN THISg~...... CARD IF YOU0..... 0.0.0...... 0...... 'I

-""INTQ~ I I ! ]Nl I I"POSED .. ' '. .,. ow.U MMUNIYaoMli'O MEETING T9OP rTF.l "M E Please kpI q, formed are doing In regard to the HISTORICAL DISTRICT extension o01 0 proposed Upper East Side Historic District and on landmark preservation In general. Y' 1AUMMO RUCmjQ 0 3M©.': '~ i A M Y 2.,,,.]3V1t,P, LJ;8

PLACE: The Dalton School 10$ East 89th Street Adde . TeteP119l*W TIME: 1:00 PM PRESIDENT O r THiE 8OOUGH O r MANHATTAN CITY OF NEW YORK NFEW YORK. N. Y. 10007

ANO01W ST6EN P068,06U? March 9, 1984

Mr, Stephen balderston 2025 Broadway, Apt. 121 New York, N! 10023 Dear Mr. Balderston, No one enjoys delivering bad news. However, I think that it is important that you know that your rent may be significantly increased unless we do something to change the current law. As I an sure you know, your building is presently rent stabilized. As a result, your rent can only be raised by a fixed percentage each year. But if the current law is not changed, your building will no longer be rent stabilized after July 1, 1988. This is because your building was constructed as part of the "421 a" program. This program, designed to encourage construction of residential buildings, granted owners a declining tax abatement for ten years but made the new buildings subject to rent stabilization for the same ten year period. The ten years is just about up for the first buildings constructed under this program and we can only anticipate a sharp rise in rents. Fortunately, there is a remedy. Together we can work to amend the legislation covering "421 a" buildings. Last year the state assembly passed such an amendment but the Republican controlled state senate rejected the proposal. I am convinced that we can win the fight this year and I am working with the 421 a Coalition and other Manhattan tenants to form a comittee to take our message directly to the Republican majority leader of the state senate, Warren Anderson.

I urge you to return the enclosed postage paid card to me so that I can keep you informed and show the Republican leaders how many people support our cause. If you would like more information please call Elizabeth Wright in my housing unit at 566-4105.

ANDREW STEIN _ II

'I; I

NO POSTAGE 11111NECESSARY IF MAILED IN THE BUSINESS REPLY MAIL UNITED STATES First Class Permit No. 6M6. Now Ye0, N.Y.

Postage will be paid by addressee Mr. Andrew Stein 1 Centre Street New York, New York 10007 N

R lIRN THIS CARD TO KEEP INFORMED ON THIS ISSUE

Dear Mr. Stein:

Ye4a I want to work with yqu to preserve rent etabl~IQJ for Leants in 421 a buildings. Keep me informed of further deWlopments on this Issue and of any activities I can prticipate W*10 you.

Name

AAkfAa. IAd W-, m n.

New York, New York Zip Code

Telephone PRESIDENT OF THE BOROUGH Or MANHATTAN " CITY O r NEW YORK NEW YORK. N.Y. 10007

ANONEW STEIN

March 20, 1984

Ms. Theresa C Terenzetti 108 E 38 St Apt. 18B New York, NY 10016

Dear Ms. Terenzetti,

I am writing to invite you to attend a community meeting to discuss a proposal to the Landmarks Preservation Commission to designate the area from 34th to 39th Street between Madison and Third Avenue as the Murray Hill Historic District.

Date: Wednesday, March 28 Place: The Community Church Hall of Worship 40 East 35th Street (Between Madison and Park) Time: 7 p.m.

You will have the opportunity to present your views as well as listen to the comments of Preservationist Brendan Gill and Gene Norman, Chairman of the Landmarks Preservation Commission. The Murray Hill Committee is c o the event.

The designation of a historic district in Murray Hill is of enormous importance. The area has unique architectural characteristics and a distinct atmosphere that should be preserved. It is important that the low density, residential character, and unique buildings be protected from further encroachment.

If you wish to express your views at our community meeting, please call Elizabeth Wright at 566-3246.

If you are unable to attend this meeting but would like to be informed of further developments regarding historic preservation and the proposed Murray Hill Historic District, please return the enclosed paid postcard.

I hope you can join us on March 28.

ANDREW STEIN w

I3 !1 AA- "I.A NO POSTAGE NECESSARY ADMISSION TICKET !F MAILED !N THE UdNiTED STATES COME TO OUR, OMMUNITY BUSINESS REPLY MAIL MEE-TING TO DISCUSS THE PROPOSED First Class Permit No. 656, New York, N.Y. MURRAY HILL HISTORICAL DISTRICT Postage will be paid by addressee

Mr. Andrew Stein DATE: Wednesday, March 28th C71 1 Centre Street PLACE. The Community Church Hall n New York, New York 10007 of Worship 40 East 35th Street (between Madison and Pak)

TIME: 7 P.M. v

~ADMII~'ON T 1~'FT RETURN THIS C EEP INFORMED 'Y I ON THIS ISSUE i i

Dear Mr.Stein, MEETING TO DISCUSS THE PROPOSED

HISTORICAL STCT Please keep me informed abo $ iht you$*I rgifV *Q to the p Murray Hill Historic District and on other Iandmin prmovation projects. DATE: Wednesday, March 28th Nan',

PLACE: The Community Church Hall do=" of Worship 40 East 35th Street 0 (between Madison -and,Park) New YNew York Zip Code_ _

0 TIME: 7 P.M. Telephone- ' Aadew Stein - oog- hidn Fuiis~ .twh aw~umoa

TH CITY Or Nlw YORK March M1W4 Ms Janet Boorky 755 West End Av Apt. 5B New York, NY 10025 Dear Ms. Boorky, We are writing to invite you to the second hearing we ar holding an discrimination in the market place.

Date: Sunday, April 1 Place: High School of Art and Design 1075 Second Avenue (Between 56th and 57th Street) Time: 11 am.

The hearing will focus on three aspects of the problems (1) Pay equity: equal pay for equal work and for work of comparable value, (2) Dsintory hiring and promotional practices, and (3) Economic disincentives e.g., inequities resulting from the absence of adequate child care and unfair retirement and health benefits.

A number of experts will testify concerning the scope of tiese problems and possible solutions. But we are most interested in bearing about your eperieces. A number of people have already asked to speak at the hearing. As space is limited, we ask that you call Laura, T6ole, 566-6237, at your earliest convenience to arrange a time to testify.

We recently held a hearing at City Hall on one aspect of sex-bMasd dlacrminl_ - the absence of equal pay for work of comparable worth. A copy of the New York Times article on the hearing is enclosed. As you can see, we are taking steps to address the issue, but more must be done.

Of course, we welcome you to attend the hearing whether you choose to testify or not. If you cannot come but would like to remain on our mailing list, please return the enclosed self-addressed postage-paid card. We look forward to seeing you on April 1. Sincerely,

Andrew Stein Carol Bellamy Manhattan Borough President President of the City

P.S. Child care will be provided at the High School for anyone who needs it. 4;euijcj Lrkt Ei1mc0 ,I .%'1))', IFBURIARY 12. 1984 Imbalances in Pay for Women Examined by City

By SETH MYDAINS Isa legal secretary as impo-,ant es a had eer:-ed.... : a' -.e ' S:)eaK.r-g !c.*he :-,Personnel Di. carpenter? Is a kindergarten "eacne, "ers ard ega ,-A .'T- - -cc:or :.ar "--.z sa.d hi s office was as important as a zookeper) s:ud'-".ogohe .,e2,,ods .sed eLlewhere Not if New York City pay scales ire .c stud". -he .ssue n an effort to deter. taien ast he meuure, a City Hal hear. and worrtg cond:';:r.s .ir.ne".e best way .oproceed. "We will ca.- er.:e" "w,'rk:rnj "r vew, Y: k leg into discrepancies in pay betwee- ou- ana.,:s and hopefully predominantly female and predorm. C'. earns 5: 4. A .--,.-.' .;:ared cone W-,1,h ic ..e a -swers soon," he nantly male jobs was told last week. -.-1:h a lega. secre:-'a. -I,$6. she sa:d aa:d Th heating, headed by C:ty Counc:i San an-..a. 'nce' 54 .' President Carol Bellamy and Boruugr. Less for KIndergarten Teachers President Andrew J. Stein of Manha!. no: be ::- a -... 7 .,s Ie , , .r Newman., "he awver who won tan, marked the city's first pubtic ex- m.:gh" !ace a .a- ,s 1.: at -. .e : e -ase aga:ns" '.,astngon State, said T',': ,",m~ '.s ago • ., - .-,m; i].:r is. ploration of salary ,mbalances, a. ,,'a: ac.-"ss -,e:outr', "Barbers get sessn.en" Aaie-..e :7)ack pDaY issue known as comparable wr-t. .-cr 'ha. )eau:,,c:ans and zookeepers One witness said that na!.ora.. aga:rs: ".e -, . - -e a..:r.g:. r Ta' e: '.,, :':[email protected] " ' --e .' 7',ke~i P.-' :ake care of there Was an annual average ciffe.- P61 nP,:drer. ence of 8,000 between ful.t:-.e ferna e rNPw "'W,rK .:'. t'e contractual Change Caled Inevitable and male workers. tarng sa ar,' : r kindergarten teach- The witness, Pamela Stone Cair, a. e"s. MOs 4nr.. are women, is assistant professor of so(iology a, £4 4,ia...-n. , ac"jal average Hunter College, said three.fourths of :ar.:ng sa',a,-,s $56 Most zoo- all women In the country remained seg- Keepe7. m(s" _1f.4-hom ar reten, are in regated In the "pink-collar ghettos" 'f ,r'. .'.ere :he starting sal- clerical, retail and low-leve ser,-I e - 5>- ,4" jobs, and that even those who had riser K.:;.-_',a0r.< to higher positions remained !or .re t-dners are required . er 4i , .77-- .- ,o .... most part in the a arts degree. "semi-prufessi .s' , -.a,: teaching, social work and nea requirement reers . . . .. : r :ase. a CGimputers as 'Women's Jobs Federal 'a d"e " ". . - " ,. ,-, " .. i :.ZZ. ha: by pay. Though some 'obs. (: -5 . ' - . - , - -'!s predom.- driver, are opening up "o . -o ". " ""r--"'e state was in said, others are becomig-n - n.e C'.I I RA .ls dominated. Some newly emerg:'. -' . -.c.-des reui"e- ' " -. . ,. ,,... ent ippor- feuaions .... like computer operatr,:, -.. . * .• , " . r"" "." ,/, ." . " K ". -- ,,.TIIa falling into the old stereotypes ,-: becomlng "women's jobs." she addeed i,'.e sate tO irti, Ronnie J. Steinberg, a spec:a:'.s: _.ncrease and py ..- women's employment at t.he State ", '. n.: :nember for versityof New York at Abar- sad !MAWj

NO POSTAGE N,ECESSARY i i IF MAILED IN THE COME TO OUR COMMUNITY MEETING TO D U -SEX4SASSD UNITED STATES BUSINESS REPLY MAIL DISCRIMINATION IN THE MARKETPLACEC Class Permit No. 8567. New York, N.Y. First DATE: Sunday, Apil 1st- Postage will be paid by addressee PLACE: High School of Art and Design Mr. Andrew Stein 1075 Second AiehUO Ms. Carol Belamy I Centre Street (between 56th and 57th Street) New York, New York 10007 TIME: 11 A.M. ADMISSION TICKET RETURN THIS CARD TO KEEP INFORMED ON THIS ISSUE

SEM N!,

COME TO OURCOMMUNITY j~ MEETING TO DISCUSS SEX-BASED ...... DISCRIMINATION N TImARKt-rLpACE Dear Mr. Stein and Ms. Bellamy,

DATE: Sunday, April 1st Please keep me informed about what you are doing In regard to women's rights and sex-based discrimination in the marketplace. PLACE: High School of Art and Design 1075 Second Avenue (between 56th and 57th Street) Ad~s: Apt. TIME: 11 A.M. eork, New York Zip Code______T one k .4

OF' MANHATTAN PRESIDENT Or THE BOROUGH Iit V CITY O NEW YORK ir''Or -1 NEW YORK. N. Y 10007

ANDRMEW 4TEIN

March 20, 1984

Ms. Theresa C Terenzetti 108 E 38 St Apt. 183 New York, NY 10016

Dear Ms. Terenzetti,

I am writing to invite you to attend a community meeting to discuss a proposal to th C Landmarks Preservation Commission to designate the area from 34th to 39th Street between Madison and Third Avenue as the Murray Hill Historic District.

Date: Wednesday, March 28 Place: The Community Church Hall of Worship 40 East 35th Street (Between Madison and Park) Time: 7 p.m. %0 You will have the opportunity to present your views as well as listen to the comments of Preservationist Brendan Gill and Gene Norman, Chairman of the Landmarks Preservation Commission. The Murray Hill Committee is co-sponsoin the event.

The designation of a historic district in Murray Hill is of enormous importance. The area has unique architectural characteristics and a distinct atmosphere that C should be preserved. It is important that the low density, residential character, and unique buildings be protected from further encroachment.

If you wish tc express your views at our community meeting, please call Elizabeth Wright at 56f -3246.

If you are usnable to attend this meeting but would like to be informed of further developments regarding historic preservation and the proposed Murray Hill Historic District, please return the enclosed paid postcard.

I hope you ca join us on March 28.

ANDREW STEIN . W L-

~-i~tii NO POSTAGE ADMISSION TICKET, NECESSARY F MAILED IN THE UNITED STATES COME TO OUR COMMUNITY BUSINESS REPLY MAIL MEETING TO DISCUSS THE PROPOSED First Class Permit No. 8587. Now York, N.Y. MURRAY HILL HISTORICAL DISTRICT Postage will be paid by address" v rN Mr. Andrew Stein DATE: Wednesday, March 28th 1 Centre Street PLACE The Community Church Hall New York, New York 10007 of Worship 40 East 35th Street (between Madison and Park TIME-- 7P.M. ADMISSION TICKET RETURN THIS CARP TO IEEP INFORMED ON THIS ISSUE

COME TO OUR COMMUNITY .MEETING TO ODSCUSS.TJiEJO2OS Dear Mr. Stein, MURRAY HILL HISTORICAL DISTRICT Please keep me informed about what you are doing in regard to the proposed Murray Hill Historic District and on other landmark presevation projects. DATE: Wednesday, March 28th Name* PLACE: The Community Church Hall APAFAm* Sof Worship r~~qM%9u 01 W I '- I J .,It 40 East 35th Street 0 (between Madison and Park) New York, New York Zip Code

(TME: -7P.M. Telephone: r ppr60E NT O r TME 0ROIUGi O MANHATTAN CITy O NEW YORK

NEW YOPIK N. Y. 10007

AN0ONIW liTEIN March 9, 1984 Mr. Stephen Balderston 2025 Broadway, Apt. 121 New York, NY 10023 Dear Mr. Balderston, No one enjoys delivering bad news. However, I think that it is important that you know that your rent may be significartly increased unless we do something to change the current law.

0% As I am sure you know, your building is presently rent stabilized. As a result, your rent can only be raised by a fixed percentage each year. 0 But if the current law is not changed, your building will no longer be 0% rent stabilized after July 1, 1988. This is because your building was constructed as part of the '421 a" program. This program, designed to encourage construction of residential buildings, granted owners a declining tax abatement for ten years but made the new buildings subject to rent stabilization for the same ten year period. The ten years is just about up for the first buildings constructed under o this program and we can only anticipate a sharp rise in rents. Fortunately, there is a remedy. Together we can work to amend the C legislation covering 0421 a' buildings. Last year the state assembly passed such an amendment but the Republican controlled state senate rejected the proposal. I am convinced that we can win the fight this year and I am working with the 421 a Coalition and other Manhattan tenants to form a comuittee to take our message directly to the Republican majority leader of the state senate, Warren Anderson.

I urge you to return the enclosed postage paid card to me so that I can keep you informed and show the Republican leaders how many people support our cause. If you would like more Information please call Elizabeth Wright in my housing unit at 566-4105.

ANDREW STEIN NO POSTAGE IDIJI NECESSARY IF MAILED IN THE UNITED BUSINESS REPLY MAIL STATES First Cis" Permit No. 857, Now York N.Y.

Postaie will be paid by address Mr. Andrew Stein 1 Centre Street New York, New York 10007 I t 11 .

RETURN THISCAAD TO KEEP INFORMED ON THIS ISSUE

Dear Mr. Stein:

Yes, I want to work with yQu to preserve rent stablization for tenants in 421 a buildings. Keep me informed Of futt#!er developments on this issue and of any activities I can participate in with you.

Name

AArree- ~%Pw 10 AptP~t.

New York. New York Zip Code

Telephone mAdrew Stin Borouh Predden

T04E CITY OF New YORK March , 1984 Ms. Janet Boorky 755 West End Av Apt. 5B New York, NY 10025 Dear Ms. Boorky, We are writing to invite you to the second hearing we are boldins o se-based discrimination in the market place. Date: Sunday, April 1 Place: High School of Art and Design 1075 Second Avenue (Between 56th and 57th Street) Time: 11 a.m.

The hearing will focus on three aspects of the problem: (1) Pay equity: equal pay for equal work and for work of comparable value, (2) Discriminatory hiring and promotional practice,0 and (3) Economic disincentives: e.g., inequities resulting from the absence of adequate child care and unfair retirement and health benefits.

A mumber of experts will testify concerning the scope of these problems and possible solutions. But we are most interested in bearing about your experience. A number of people have already asked to speak at the hearing. As space is limited, we ask that you call Laura'T6ole, 566-6Z37, at yow earliest convenience to arrange a time to testify.

We recently held a hearing at City Hall on one aspect of sexbased discrimination - the absence of equal pay for work of comparable worth. A copy of the New York Times article on the hearing is enclosed. As you can see, we are taking steps to address the issue, but more must be done.

Of course, we welcome you to attend the hearing whether you choose to testify or not. If you cannot come but would like to remain on our mailing lists please return the enclosed self-addressed postage-paid card; We look forward to seeing you on April 1. Sincerely,

fAow Andrew Stein Carol Bellamy Manhattan Borough President President of the City

P.S. Child care will be provided at the High School for anyone who needs it. ~c~eo prk Z 41nC SLNDA Y. FEBR U.4RY 12, 1984 Imbalances in Pay for Women Examined by City

By SETH MYDANS Isa as leae scretary --. a _.-. a- a ba.t-_er e..-rc -- . ns ::! cA.-Pen, S:,,)K-Pag f.-z *')e . Personxel Di. carpenter? Is a kinderg a.e: :ea ,e: tei-s EM-crga xa~.ere c- - rector i ua,- '" C.-= said us office was as important as a zookeeper) "_.-~e" znase . e:1r 'c,-,n mea'-: ,es stu..,-, the mehcs used elewhere Not If New York City pay sca~ies a7r tc sradv the acsue &rn' e.o. to deter. taken as the measure, a CTV a'.. he,.- mine 1ne best, way. ,-, proceed. ""We Wlf ing into discrepancies in pay be-wee- A Zr:er wc:,.n !, eW "kcrkY cornzue o,, na~vs.,s and hopeull predominantly female and p'edoo. C:,O'rear-.s $" 4, a non-., -=ared come ur %-.h some answers soon," he nantly male jobs was told last wee. w'r aega. s 566rn,scf e %aid said The bearing, headed by C:t, Cou.:. !C7 8 ,.n " :! 1rence "c? ., V . Preldent Carol Bellamy and Bc.'u ._ Lefs for Kindergariem Teacben President Andrew J. Sten c! M..-.a- Rot beg:-. . S"" ' ::'." :S'e. it Newran, t-e ,awver who wo= tan, marked the ci,.'s !-- s-:. ex. te :- ls a.f-. '. "-,,gwr. State. scad v:.-.:.-: - -- - 2. r.:[[..".-.- ploratio, of salar' :,-,,:.a-ts. a: *:- ac.-)s :-t .o.,try. "Barners get iue known as compa-able w.- :".- s e F- a.sy 'n .at nc,' . i-. 5 *c-a."s and zookeepern One witness Said :Aat r::o7.a.:, • :gv" ,pp.ec get mzr: 2,-a:. peeple who take care of tbeM Was an annual average d.!fe.. enceof 18.000 between uliu.trre fer..ae ChjL.8e Calit-d 'lnevitabie' In New Y rk C-.-%-,*-he contractual and male workers. _ arT!-, SLE-N'. 7 icLnde.garen teach. The witness, Parneia Stone Ca:r., a. . "'s.-,.' 7 e- . ers, most Of w, crr, are women, is > '3 . , " . . r.: - .-P 'T., -. as asitant professor of socio;ogy a, S'4A.. atong .he act'ua average Hunter College, said tL'.crefou s c' 5:a.-jng saa- :s S1E,01. Most zoo- all women in the cotmtrv ,*e,a.ec se . K-e ' os wno"om F. .men, are in regated In the "pink-coll'ar gn. -77 _' : .. 7. . . .. 7 1 a ,,"..2'.7rv '-.e" the start:rg 5.a . clerical, retail and low.eve se.-oc ...... -. Re t z . - tho6e %- jobs, and that even whc -s,- .7" to higher pos,6ionrs r .ana.'ne '-:. .. 7 . . K .:ne-r.-c :acers are .required c~a.:-s degree. most pa.r i the "semn-p.,es'., .- I nx.:n. e<, ~ca_rs .equi"emenzl teaching, soc:al work a:pn .-7. res. ,,,--.,r .st a Federa: Computers as '%omer*% .itK -. ,::"r~i. .:-. , unO .ntr:at oy pay. Though some jobs, s-6;-, as r~ .:-r sa,a.-. ficr .obs predorn. driver, are opening up tc wo. A .7en t.c . '.r. .ne state was Ln said, others are beowr.-4. ML-, :t" 7177 ".AD 2, O a]rT 7 L , >.*4.t;.,w.t-:zr :nc~udes r'qrel' dominated. Some newly emeT. '-" " " K .7. " :t ','stM--* fessions like compute: cpt:: rt '.. ,ent oppor. falling into the old seeo.r. 1- becoming: "women's Jobs, " s., a :t .n-i.esoate to Lsti. Ronnie J. Steinberg, a s;c.. e-. :,,a nc-a% and pav 2..heS.: women's employment a: :, ,. , -p:e er In,. for veriryof New York at ,,ban.y._- s, , Ke-5 ADMISSION TICKET NO POSTAGE I'll' NECESSARY IF MAILED COME TO OUR COMMUNITY IN THE MEETING TO DISCUSS SEX-BASED UNITED STATES BUSINESS REPLY MAIL DISCRIMINATION IN THE MARKETPLACE First Clas Permit No. 3567, New York, N.Y. DATE: Sunday, April 1st Postage will be paid by addresse Mr. Andrew Stein 'PLACE: High School of Art and Design Ms. Carol Bellamy 1075 Second Avenue 1 Centre Street (between 56th and 57th Street) New York, New York 10007 TIME: 11 A.M. ADMISSION TICKET RETURN THIS CARD TO KEEP INFORMED ON THIS ISSUE

...... MEETrNqGCOME TO DISCOS.EX:I3IXSEDOUR COMMUNITY DISCRIMINATION IN THE; MARKETPLACEs

...... DATE: Sunday, April 1st...... Please keep me informed about what you are doing in regard to women's rights and sex-based discrimination in the marketplace. PLACE: High School of Art and Design 1075 Second Avenue Name,-,,i: . , (between 56th and 57th Street) Apt..

TIME: 11 A.M. N OXrk, New York Zip Code _____

Telephone PRESIDENT OF THE BOROUGH OF MANHATTAN CITY OF NEW YORK NEW YORK, N.Y. 10007

ANDREW STEIN

April Z3, 1984 Ms. Alta Nadelberg 180 West End Ave. Apt. 5L New York, NY 10023 Dear Ms. Nadelberg, As I am sure you know, the building you live in is known as a Title I project.. While Title I has been the subject of recent litigation, your building is not directly involved. Nonetheless, because many of you have asked me about recent developments involving co-op conversions of Title I projects, I would like to share with you a review of my activities in this area. On Thursday, September 15, 1983, I sponsored a resolution at the Board of %0 Estimate putting it on record as solidly supporting the view that any conversion of a Title I project to a cooperative or condominium must be '- approved by the Board (resolution enclosed). I was very pleased when the O. Board of Estimate unanimously supported my resolution. When legal challenges followed this action, I encouraged the Corporation Counsel of New York City and the Attorney General of New York State to '.0 support our position in the courts. Inthe initial case, unfortunately, the courts ruled against the city's position. This decision is now being appealed. 0 As the appeal is being heard, I want you to know that I will continue to be guided in my actions by an original concern which prompted me to offer my Board of Estimate resolution. That concern is a simple one: that the rights of tenants in all Title I projects be fully protected. Furthermore, 17. while the current focus deals with three Manhattan projects, what is determined in these cases will set a precedent for all Title I conversion o proposals. For these reasons I will continue to work for and ci for the requirement of Board of Estimate approval of any conversions in Title I projects. Lastly, I would much appreciate any thoughts you have on this subject. If you would like to be kept informed, please return the enclosed card.

Sincerely,

Andrew Stein - Exeptdfomte 3 C4* A4 LENl6J91 D7A @ R Board of Estimate

No. 76 R4-43 IN THE MATTER OF a COMMUNICATION dated August 11, 19@3, from the President. Borough of MAnhattan, transmitting the following resolution which would require that before the conversion of any Federal Title I redevelopment projects from rental to cooperative or ondominium ownership, application must be made to the Board of Estimate for ap- proval of such conversions: WHEREAS, The federal Housing At of 1949 provided for financial assistance, 1loansan grants to clear. replan. reconstruct and rehabilitate blighted neighbor. hoods throughout the nation including New York City;, and WHEREAS, Under Title I of the Act, the federal government provided capital pants to the City of New York to fund the acquisition of property througfiout te City by condemnation proceedinp; and WHEREAS. The Board of Estimate of the City of New York exercised its power of eminent domain to assemble sites for developments, thereby displacing thousands of individuals and small businesses, and authorized the expenditure of millions of public dollars to make possible the development of thes projects; and WHEREAS. Section 509 of the agreement between the City of New York and Manhattantown, Inc. a Title I project located in the Borough of Manhattan (now known as Park West Village) dated May 22, 1962. states that "for a period of forty years from the completion of the project no change shall be made in such project as set forth in the redevelopment Plan attached hereto as Schedule A %ithoutthe con- sent of the City Planning Commission and the Board of Estimte of the City; and WHEREAS, Section 510(b) of the agreement between the City of New York and Columbus Circle Apartments, a Title I project located in the Borough of Manhattan (now known as Coliseum Apartments) dated January 15, 1063, stat. that "for a period of forty (40) years from the completion of the housing project no chme shall be made in the project a et forth in the Redevelopment Plan of the Area (Schedule A of this A emen) without the consent of the City Planming Commission and the Board of Estimate of the City or of the respectivsuccessors of said Commission and Board"; and WHEREAS, Section 510(c) of the agreement between the City of New York and New York University/Beolevue, a Title I project located in the Borough of Manhattan (now known as Kips Bay) dated September 23, 1954, states that "for the period of forty (40) yea from the cmpletion of the housing project no change shall be nmde in the housing project as set forth in the Redevelopment Plan contained in Schedule A of this Agreement, without the consent of the City Planning Commis- sion and the Board of Estimate of the City or of the respective successors of said Commission and Board"; and WHEREAS. The stated objective of emb redevelopment plan was "to provide housing at the lowest possible rental which is consistant with sound financial plan. ning" and and to obtain this objective the Board of Estimate established below mar. ket sales pries for the land on which the aforementioned projects are situated by determining the capitalized value of the development described in the redevelop. ment plan of each project using projected per room rents substantially below the market value rentals, thus reducing the overall cost of each project to its sponsor; and WHEREAS. It was the dlear intent of the Board of Estimate to reserve its right to determine the appropriateness of any change in the redevelopment plans for these projects; and WHEREAS, The three aforementioned Title I projects are at various stages in the process of attempted conversion from rental to cooperative or ,ondominium ownerhsip; and WHEREAS, The Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York has halted any further pr ng of the conversion of certain of these developments pending City Planning Commission nnd Board of Estimate approval. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Estimate deems a conver- sion from rental to cooperative or condominium ow'nership in project. constructed under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949 to be a change in the Redevelopment Plan as adopted by the Board of Estimate; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in order for a Title I rental development to convert to cooperative or condominium ownership Board of Estimate approval must be applied for and granted. On August 18. 1983 (Cal. No. 289), the matter was lai over to thi meeting. For €onszderation--..one resolution. 0

%~C PrOSAGIE 7U111 ' ECESSARY

N 7' L BUSINESS REPLY MAIL E: STATES First Class Permit No. 857. New York, N.Y.

Postage will be paid by address"

Mr. Andrew Stein 1 Centre Street New York, New York 10007 KEEP INFORMED 0ILLO4A RETURN THIS POSTAGE PAID CA D

Dear Mr. Stein Yes, keep me informed on t0e cont 'inu*g effort i . to trol co-op conversion of Title I buildings.

Address: Apt

NeW York, New York Zip Code Telephone: ,,row-

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 1125 K SRuti N.W WAS9INGION.D.C. 204b§

THI]S IS THE BEGIJSUING OF fUR # 9 Tl-v 1

Date Filmed A g, Camera No.

Cameraman "Z"R'L