Ukraine Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ukraine Introduction EU 4+ SPACE IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FOR THE EUROPEAN SPACE ENDEAVOUR Report 5, September 2007 Charlotte Mathieu, ESPI European Space Policy Institute Report 5, September 2007 1 Short Title: ESPI Report 5, September 2007 Editor, Publisher: ESPI European Space Policy Institute A-1030 Vienna, Schwarzenbergplatz 6 Austria http://www.espi.or.at Tel.: +43 1 718 11 18 - 0 Fax - 99 Copyright: ESPI, September 2007 This report was funded, in part, through a contract with the EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY (ESA). Rights reserved - No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose without permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “source: ESPI Report 5, September 2007. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. Price: 11,00 EUR Printed by ESA/ESTEC Compilation, Layout and Design: M. A. Jakob/ESPI and Panthera.cc Report 5, September 2007 2 EU 4+ Executive Summary ....................................................................................... 5 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………7 Part I - The New EU Member States Introduction................................................................................................... 9 1. What is really at stake for Europe? ....................................................... 10 1.1. The European space community could benefit from a further cooperation with the ECS ................................................................. 10 1.2. However, their economic weight remains small in the European landscape and they still suffer from organisatorial and funding issues .... 11 1.2.1. Economic weight of the ECS in Europe ........................................... 11 1.2.2. Reality of their impact on competition ............................................ 11 1.2.3. Foreign policy issues ................................................................... 12 1.2.4. Internal challenges ..................................................................... 12 1.3. But the ECS have gained significant political weight through their EU membership ........................................................... 14 2. The ECS and Space ............................................................................... 15 2.1. The role of space in the ECS: Space as a tool for development .............. 15 2.2. The role of the ECS in the European space activities ............................ 15 2.3. The vicious circles of the development of the ECS’ space activities ......... 16 2.4. The development of space-based applications in the NMS ..................... 16 2.5. The need for an external impetus ..................................................... 17 2.6. The timing is crucial ........................................................................ 19 3. The question of ESA membership ......................................................... 21 3.1. The relationships between ESA and the ECS ....................................... 21 3.1.1. Cooperation Agreements and PRODEX ........................................... 21 3.1.2. The Plan for European Cooperating States (PECS) ........................... 21 3.1.3. The PECS experience and the options for the way forward ................ 22 3.2. Benefits and costs of the ESA Membership ......................................... 23 3.3. Challenges to the ESA membership ................................................... 24 3.3.1. For the ECS ............................................................................... 24 3.3.2. For ESA and its Member States ..................................................... 25 Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................. 26 Appendices Part I Appendix A Fact Sheet on the Czech Republic………………………………………………… 28 Fact Sheet on Hungary ………………………………………………………………… 30 Fact Sheet on Poland………………………………………………………………………32 Fact Sheet on Romania……………………………………………………………………34 Appendix B Space Activities and their Environment in the… Czech Republic…………………………………………………………………………………37 Hungary……………………………………………………………………………………………49 Poland……………………………………………………………………………………………… 61 Romania……………………………………………………………………………………………72 European Space Policy Institute Report 5, September 2007 3 Part II – Ukraine Introduction .............................................................................................. 82 1. Ukraine today – The political and economic context ............................. 83 1.1. The Ukrainian economy ................................................................... 83 1.2. The Ukrainian political situation ........................................................ 84 1.3. Ukraine and the West...................................................................... 85 2. Strengths and weaknesses of the Ukrainian space sector .................... 86 2.1. Ukraine’s space potential inherited from the Soviet era ........................ 86 2.1.1. A tremendous expertise gained during the Soviet times ................ 86 2.1.2. And important space capabilities in heritage ................................ 86 2.1.3. However Ukraine was left in a difficult situation ........................... 86 2.2. The transition towards a space nation................................................ 86 2.2.1. Space in the independent Ukraine ............................................. 87 2.2.2. The conversion from military to civil-oriented space activities ........ 87 2.2.3. The transition from mass production to low-volume production ...... 87 2.2.4. Ukraine managed to remain a major space nation ........................ 87 2.3. Ukraine’s competitive advantage ...................................................... 88 2.3.1. The low production costs in Ukraine ........................................... 88 2.3.2. But for how long? .................................................................... 88 2.4. Political and institutional issues ........................................................ 89 2.4.1. Political issues ........................................................................ 89 2.4.2. The role of the National Space Agency ....................................... 90 2.4.3. Limits to its independence ........................................................ 90 2.5. Challenges to the development of space activities ............................... 90 2.5.1. Adaptation to market principles ................................................. 90 2.5.2. Insufficient intellectual property protection ................................. 90 2.5.3. Adaptation to Western technical standards .................................. 90 2.5.4. Limited benefits to citizens ....................................................... 90 2.5.5. The interdependence with Russia ............................................... 91 3. The future of space activities in Ukraine ............................................... 92 3.1. The main challenges ....................................................................... 92 3.1.1. Funding ................................................................................. 92 3.1.2. Human resources .................................................................... 92 3.1.3. The need for new projects ........................................................ 92 3.2. Options ......................................................................................... 92 3.2.1. An independent Ukrainian space industry ................................... 933 3.2.2. Development of large-scale cooperation with new partners ........... 93 3.2.3. Continuing the cooperation with Russia ...................................... 93 4. Cooperation with Europe - Opportunities and challenges ..................... 94 4.1. Rationales for cooperation ............................................................... 94 4.2. Challenges to Europe-Ukraine cooperation ......................................... 94 4.2.1. Different definitions of cooperation ............................................ 94 4.2.2. Lack of transparency and long-term vision .................................. 94 4.2.3. Will Ukraine’s competitive advantage last? .................................. 94 4.2.4. Language problems ................................................................. 95 4.2.5. The issue of missile proliferation ................................................ 95 4.3. Potential opportunities and mechanisms for cooperation....................... 95 4.3.1. Cooperation supported by the European Union ............................ 95 4.3.2. Participation in EU programmes................................................. 95 4.3.3. Participation in ESA programmes ............................................... 95 4.3.4. Participation in the joint EU/ESA programmes ............................. 96 Conclusions – Recommendations ................................................................. 97 Appendices Part II Appendix A Fact Sheet on Ukraine…………………………………………………………………… 99 Appendix B Space Activities and their Environment in Ukraine………………………102 Report 5, September 2007 4 EU 4+ Executive Summary The successive enlargements of the European specificities, reflected in their space Union (EU) have created new opportunities activities. A common approach coordinated and challenges. The Union’s expansion between the European Commission (EC) and towards Central and Eastern Europe ESA towards these four countries would be could be particularly beneficial to Europe simpler but
Recommended publications
  • Shuttle-Mir Rendezvous & [Locking Missions
    / tv -t_ ---Fi>{ NASA-TM-II2692 • _7, w- -_ ° ;: Fourth Report of the Task Force on the Shuttle-Mir Rendezvous & [locking Missions March 1, 1995 A Task Force of the NASA Advisory Council THOMAS P. STAFFORD 1006 Cameron Street Alexandria, VA 22314 March 1, 1995 Dr. Bradford Paxkinson Chairman, National Aeronautics and Space Administration Advisory Council National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC 20546-0001 Dear Dr. Parkinson: Enclosed is the fourth report of the NAC Task Force on the Shuttle-Mir Rendezvous and Docking Missions. This report is the culmination of a two and one-half month review of preparations in Russia for the Phase 1A missions (Soyuz TM-21, Mir 18 Main Expedition, and STS-71). Once again the Task Force received tremendous support from many individuals and organizations at NASA. The same applied to our site visits in Russia where we were met with an openness and candor which served to reinforce our confidence in the ultimate success of the upcoming missions. Over the next two months, the Task Force will be focusing its efforts in two areas. The first are the preparations for STS-71, including the status of the Orbiter Docking System and the analysis of data produced by the STS-63 mission. The second area is the NASA and NASA contractor presence in Russia, including the interaction of Phase 1 and Phase 2 personnel, NASA and contractor functions, and the transition from Phase 1 to Phase 2. Sincerely, Thomas P. Stafford CC: NASA/HQ/Code A/Mr. Goldin NASA/HQ/Code A/Gen. Dailey NASA/HQ/Code A/Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Missiles OUTLOOK
    SPECIFICATIONS Missiles OUTLOOK/ GENERAL DATA AIRFRAME GUIDANCE OUTLOOK/ POWERPLANT SPECIFICATIONS MAX. MAX. SPAN, BODY LAUNCH MAX. RANGE STATUS/OUTLOOK/REMARKS DESIGNATION/NAME LENGTH WINGS OR DIAMETER WEIGHT CONTRACTOR TYPE NO. MAKE & MODEL (FT.) FINS (FT.) (FT.) (LB.) (NAUT. MI.) AIR-TO-AIR CHUNG-SHAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (CSIST), Taoyuan, Taiwan Skysword 1 (Tien Chien 1) 9.8 2.1 0.42 196.4 — IR 1 X solid propellant 9.7 In service with Taiwan air force since 1993. Skysword 2 (Tien Chien 2) 11.8 2 0.62 396.8 — Active radar 1 X solid propellant 32.4 In service with Taiwan air force since 1996. DENEL (PTY.) LTD., Pretoria, South Africa OPERATORS SATELLITE A-Darter 9.8 1.6 0.54 195.8 Denel IIR 1 X solid propellant — Fifth-generation technology demonstrator. Likely co-development with Brazil. COMMERCIAL R-Darter 11.9 2.1 0.53 264 Denel Radar 1 X solid propellant — Development completed 2000. For South African Air Force Cheetah and Gripen aircraft. U-Darter 9.6 1.67 0.42 210 Denel Two-color, IR 1 X solid propellant — First revealed in 1988; similar to Magic. Entered production in 1994. In use on South African Air Force Cheetah and Impala aircraft. DIEHL BGT DEFENSE, Uberlingen, Germany COMMERCIAL AIM-9L/I-1 Sidewinder 9.4 2.1 0.4 189 Diehl BGT Defense IR 1 X solid propellant — Upgraded and refurbished. IRIS-T 9.7 — 0.4 196 Diehl BGT Defense IIR 1 X solid propellant — In production. SATELLITE OPERATORS SATELLITE MBDA MISSILE SYSTEMS (BAE Systems, EADS, Finmeccanica), London, UK; Vélizy, France; Rome, Italy Aspide 12.1 3.4 0.67 479 Alenia Semiactive radar, homing 1 X solid propellant 43 In service.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Instrument Space-Borne Observations and Validation of the Physical Model of the Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Coupling
    Multi-instrument space-borne observations and validation of the physical model of the Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere-Magnetosphere Coupling Abstract We propose an investigation of the near-Earth space plasma dynamics and electromagnetic environment by multiparameter analysis from variety of space-based missions and creation of physical model of the coupling between lithosphere, atmosphere, ionosphere and magnetosphere which are linked by the chain of processes initiated by atmospheric boundary layer modification by air pollution (dust aerosols, nuclear disaster) and modification of boundary layer by major natural disasters: earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes/typhoons and volcanoes. Our intention is to find from experimental data and their detailed analysis the key processes in atmosphere, which modify the Earth plasma environment system under various geophysical conditions including natural and anthropogenic disasters. As input for analysis and modeling we will use the data products about atmosphere, ionosphere and magnetosphere from different satellites, including NASA EOS (TERRA, AQUA), NOAA/POES, and ESA/ EUMETSAT (METEOSAT, ENVISAT, SWARM), DEMETER/CNES, FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC, as well as ground observations of GPS/TEC, ground electromagnetic (EM) fields meteorological monitoring data, geochemistry, etc. Statistical studies that use these data sets individually have already proven the complex nature of the interconnection between lithosphere and atmosphere events and earth space environment through the Global Electric Circuit. Just recently the members of this team came independently to same conclusion that many processes in atmosphere of different origin create the similar variations in the space plasma environment what implies the existence of common physical mechanism of their generation. One of the main drivers for such coupling is the change of the boundary layer conductivity through the air pollution, Ion Induced Nucleation triggered by natural and anthropogenic radioactivity, and mesoscale atmospheric systems such as tropical hurricanes/typhoons.
    [Show full text]
  • Évkönyvbeszámoló 2009
    Hungarian Academy of Sciences Centre for Energy Research Progress Report on Research Activities 2012 CENTRE FOR ENERGY RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT 2012 HUNGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES CENTRE FOR ENERGY RESEARCH 29-33. KONKOLY THEGE MIKLÓS ÚT 1121 BUDAPEST, HUNGARY PROGRESS REPORT ON RESEARCH ACTIVITIES IN 2012 1 CENTRE FOR ENERGY RESEARCH PROGRESS REPORT 2012 Dear Reader, Welcome to the first Progress Report of the Centre for Energy Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences. From January 1, 2012, the Institute of Isotopes joined the KFKI Atomic Energy Research Institute in the framework of a major reorganisation of the institute network of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. The merging of the two institutes was carried out without substantial difficulties, however, it was a good argument to reconsider their strategies. As far as nuclear energy R&D&I is concerned, the strategy has remained unchanged. It consists of three basic elements, namely to provide the scientific background for the extended safe operation of the Paks NPP units, to participate in the preparation of constructing new nuclear units in Hungary, and to contribute to the international efforts related to the closure of the fuel cycle and the development of the new generation of power reactors. Concentrating human resources and infrastructures to these challenges is the most important duty of the management. Hopefully, the proposed Hungarian national nuclear R&D program will start rather soon and it will decisively influence the activities of the research centre. The establishing of a strong nuclear cooperation among the nuclear research centres of the Visegrád 4 countries aiming at the construction of a Generation 4 reactor also requires a strong governmental support.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Steps Toward Permanent Human Presence in Space
    SALYUT: Soviet Steps Toward Permanent Human Presence in Space December 1983 NTIS order #PB84-181437 Recommended Citation: SALYUT: Soviet Steps Toward Permanent Human Presence in Space–A Technical Mere- orandum (Washington, D. C.: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, OTA- TM-STI-14, December 1983). Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 83-600624 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 Foreword As the other major spacefaring nation, the Soviet Union is a subject of interest to the American people and Congress in their deliberations concerning the future of U.S. space activities. In the course of an assessment of Civilian Space Stations, the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) has undertaken a study of the presence of Soviets in space and their Salyut space stations, in order to provide Congress with an informed view of Soviet capabilities and intentions. The major element in this technical memorandum was a workshop held at OTA in December 1982: it was the first occasion when a significant number of experts in this area of Soviet space activities had met for extended unclassified discussion. As a result of the workshop, OTA prepared this technical memorandum, “Salyut: Soviet Steps Toward Permanent Human Presence in Space. ” It has been reviewed extensively by workshop participants and others familiar with Soviet space activities. Also in December 1982, OTA wrote to the U. S. S. R.’s Ambassador to the United States Anatoliy Dobrynin, requesting any information concerning present and future Soviet space activities that the Soviet Union judged could be of value to the OTA assess- ment of civilian space stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study of Pridneprovskaya Thermal Power Plant Reconstruction Project
    NEDO —IC-00ER01 Feasibility Study of Pridneprovskaya Thermal Power Plant Reconstruction Project IVIarch, 2001 New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) usted by: Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc. 020005064 -9 Feasibility Study of Pridneprovskaya Thermal Power Plant Reconstruction Project Entrusted by : Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc. Prepared on : March, 2001 Study purpose This project has been framed to apply Scrap & Build project of 300MW Electric power plan, to the Pridneprovskaya Thermal Power Plant owned by the JST Dneproenergo in the UKRAINE,. This project is aimed at improving the efficiency of aged facilities of the plant; enhancing its environment-friendliness; and reducing the emission of greenhouse gases. NEDO-IC —00ER01 Feasibility Study of Pridneprovskaya Thermal Power Plant Reconstruction Project March, 2001 New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) Entrusted by: Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc. Preface This Report is a result of the survey of the Feasibility Study of Pridneprovskaya Thermal Power Plant Reconstruction Project, which Chubu Electric Power Co., Inc. received consignment of New Energy Development and Industrial Technology Organization (NEDO) to conduct this study. In December 1997, the Third Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP3) was held in Kyoto. At the conference, the "Kyoto Protocol" was adopted in order to prevent global warming caused by greenhouse gases including carbon dioxide. It commits developed countries to reduce their average emissions of greenhouse gases by at least 5% "in the period 2008 - 15" from the 1990 level. Japan set its target of reduction at 6%. The Kyoto Protocol also provides measures to give flexibility in attaining the goals: "Joint Implementation (JI)" and "Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)." In JI, greenhouse gas reductions are shared among developed countries through implementation of specific international projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Space in Central and Eastern Europe
    EU 4+ SPACE IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FOR THE EUROPEAN SPACE ENDEAVOUR Report 5, September 2007 Charlotte Mathieu, ESPI European Space Policy Institute Report 5, September 2007 1 Short Title: ESPI Report 5, September 2007 Editor, Publisher: ESPI European Space Policy Institute A-1030 Vienna, Schwarzenbergplatz 6 Austria http://www.espi.or.at Tel.: +43 1 718 11 18 - 0 Fax - 99 Copyright: ESPI, September 2007 This report was funded, in part, through a contract with the EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY (ESA). Rights reserved - No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose without permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “source: ESPI Report 5, September 2007. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. Price: 11,00 EUR Printed by ESA/ESTEC Compilation, Layout and Design: M. A. Jakob/ESPI and Panthera.cc Report 5, September 2007 2 EU 4+ Executive Summary ....................................................................................... 5 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………7 Part I - The New EU Member States Introduction................................................................................................... 9 1. What is really at stake for Europe? ....................................................... 10 1.1. The European space community could benefit from a further cooperation with the ECS ................................................................. 10 1.2. However, their economic weight remains small in the European landscape and they still suffer from organisatorial and funding issues .... 11 1.2.1. Economic weight of the ECS in Europe ........................................... 11 1.2.2. Reality of their impact on competition ............................................ 11 1.2.3. Foreign policy issues ................................................................... 12 1.2.4. Internal challenges ..................................................................... 12 1.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation Slides
    Zoltán Zboray Hungarian Space Office Ministry of National Development Introduction Introduction Publications about the Hungarian Space Industry, 2014-2016 Milestones from the history of the Hungarian space related activites 1946: The Moon-Radar Experiment, the beginning of Hungarian space activities 10-part coulometer for the Zoltán BAY addition of reflected signals physicist (1900-1992) Artwork for the Moon-Radar The antenna (6x8 m²) of the Moon-Radar Experiment Experiment on the memorial Tungsram Research Laboratory, Budapest, Hungary tablet placed at Bay’s house of birth in Gyula, Hungary Milestones from the history of the Hungarian space related activites 1967: Hungary joined the Intercosmos program Sputnik-1, 1957.10.04 SAS (Signal Analyser and Sampler) plasma wave Intersputnik Space experiment, ELTE Space „Agreement on Cooperation in the Exploration Communications Base, Research Group, 1989 and Use of Outer Space for Peaceful Purposes” Taliándörögd, Hungary, 1977 Milestones from the history of the Hungarian space related activites 26.05.1980: The first Hungarian spaceflight Astronauts Bertalan FARKAS (HU) and Valerij Three generations of the KUBASOV (USSR), ready for launch onboard the Astronauts Bertalan Farkas (Hungary), Sally Ride and Jim Voss (United States) performing measurements with the „Pille” dosimeter, KFKI Soyuz-36 within the framework of Intercosmos Atomic Energy Research Hungarian „Pille” dosimeter program Institution Milestones from the history of the Hungarian space related activites 2004: Hungarian space industry
    [Show full text]
  • California State University, Northridge Low Earth Orbit
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE LOW EARTH ORBIT BUSINESS CENTER A Project submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering by Dallas Gene Bienhoff May 1985 The Proj'ectof Dallas Gene Bienhoff is approved: Dr. B. J. Bluth Professor T1mothy Wm. Fox - Chair California State University, Northridge ii iii ACKNOWLEDGEHENTS I wish to express my gratitude to those who have helped me over the years to complete this thesis by providing encouragement, prodding and understanding: my advisor, Tim Fox, Chair of Mechanical and Chemical Engineering; Dr. B. J. Bluth for her excellent comments on human factors; Dr. B. J. Campbell for improving the clarity; Richard Swaim, design engineer at Rocketdyne Division of Rockwell International for providing excellent engineering drawings of LEOBC; Mike Morrow, of the Advanced Engineering Department at Rockwell International who provided the Low Earth Orbit Business Center panel figures; Bob Bovill, a commercial artist, who did all the artistic drawings because of his interest in space commercialization; Linda Martin for her word processing skills; my wife, Yolanda, for egging me on without nagging; and finally Erik and Danielle for putting up with the excuse, "I have to v10rk on my paper," for too many years. iv 0 ' PREFACE The Low Earth Orbit Business Center (LEOBC) was initially conceived as a modular structure to be launched aboard the Space Shuttle, it evolved to its present configuration as a result of research, discussions and the desire to increase the efficiency of space utilization. Although the idea of placing space stations into Earth orbit is not new, as is discussed in the first chapter, and the configuration offers nothing new, LEOBC is unique in its application.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2012
    Federal Aviation Administration The Annual Compendium of Commercial Space Transportation: 2012 February 2013 About FAA About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover art: Phil Smith, The Tauri Group (2013) NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. • i • Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation Dear Colleague, 2012 was a very active year for the entire commercial space industry. In addition to all of the dramatic space transportation events, including the first-ever commercial mission flown to and from the International Space Station, the year was also a very busy one from the government’s perspective. It is clear that the level and pace of activity is beginning to increase significantly.
    [Show full text]
  • Zhuk Outcover.Indd
    The Carl Beck Papers in Russian & East European Studies Sergei I. Zhuk Number 1906 Popular Culture, Identity, and Soviet Youth in Dniepropetrovsk, 1959–84 The Carl Beck Papers in Russian & East European Studies Number 1906 Sergei I. Zhuk Popular Culture, Identity, and Soviet Youth in Dniepropetrovsk, 1959–84 Sergei I. Zhuk is Associate Professor of Russian and East European History at Ball State University. His paper is part of a new research project, “The West in the ‘Closed City’: Cultural Consumption, Identities, and Ideology of Late Socialism in Soviet Ukraine, 1964–84.” Formerly a Professor of American History at Dniepropetrovsk University in Ukraine, he completed his doctorate degree in Russian History at the Johns Hopkins University in 2002 and recently published Russia’s Lost Reformation: Peasants, Millennialism, and Radical Sects in Southern Russia and Ukraine, 1830–1917 (2004). No. 1906, June 2008 © 2008 by The Center for Russian and East European Studies, a program of the University Center for International Studies, University of Pittsburgh ISSN 0889-275X Image from cover: Rock performance by Dniepriane near the main building of Dniepropetrovsk University, August 31, 1980. Photograph taken by author. The Carl Beck Papers Editors: William Chase, Bob Donnorummo, Ronald H. Linden Managing Editor: Eileen O’Malley Editorial Assistant: Vera Dorosh Sebulsky Submissions to The Carl Beck Papers are welcome. Manuscripts must be in English, double-spaced throughout, and between 40 and 90 pages in length. Acceptance is based on anonymous review. Mail submissions to: Editor, The Carl Beck Papers, Center for Russian and East European Studies, 4400 Wesley W. Posvar Hall, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.
    [Show full text]
  • VII Congress
    Association of Space Explorers 7th Planetary Congress Berlin, Germany 1991 Commemorative Poster Signature Key Viktor Afanasyev Vladimir Aksyonov Alexander Alexandrov (Bul.) Soyuz TM-11 Soyuz 22, Soyuz T-2 Soyuz TM-5 Joe Allen Alexander Balandin John-David Bartoe STS 5, STS 51A Soyuz TM-9 STS 51F Patrick Baudry Gerald Carr Robert Cenker STS 51G Skylab IV 7 STS 61C Jean-Loup Chretien Charles Conrad, Jr. Samuel Durrance Soyuz T-6, Soyuz TM-7 Gemini 5, Gemini 11 STS 35 Apollo 12, Skylab II Lev Dyomin John Fabian Bertalan Farkas Soyuz 15 STS 7, STS 51G Soyuz 36 Reinhard Furrer Drew Gaffney Viktor Gorbatko STS 61A STS 40 Soyuz 7, Soyuz 24, Soyuz 37 Georgi Grechko Miroslaw Hermaszewski Alexander Ivanchenkov Soyuz 17, Soyuz 26 Soyuz 30 Soyuz 29, Soyuz T-6 Soyuz T-14 Georgi Ivanov Yevgeni Khrunov Vladimir Kovolyonok Soyuz 33 Soyuz 5 Soyuz 25, Soyuz 29, Soyuz T-4 Alexei Leonov Don Lind James Lovell, Jr. Voskhod 2, Apollo-Soyuz STS 51B Gemini 7, Gemini 12 Apollo 8, Apollo 13 Vladimir Lyakhov Oleg Makarov Gennadi Manakov Soyuz 32, Soyuz T-9 Soyuz 12, Soyuz 27, Soyuz T-3 Soyuz TM-10 Soyuz TM-6 Musa Manarov Jon McBride Bruce McCandless II Soyuz TM-4, Soyuz TM-11 STS 41G STS 41B, STS 31 Ernst Messerschmid William Nelson Wubbo Ockels STS 61A STS 61C STS 61A Donald Peterson Leonid Popov Dumitru Prunariu STS 6 Soyuz 35, Soyuz 40, Soyuz T-7 Soyuz 40 Vladimir Remek Stuart Roosa Rusty Schweickart Soyuz 28 Apollo 14 Apollo 9 Vitali Sevastyonov Thomas Stafford Gennadi Strekalov Soyuz 9, Soyuz 18 Gemini 6, Gemini 9, Apollo 10 Soyuz T-3, Soyuz T-8 Apollo-Soyuz Soyuz TM-11 Valentina Tereshkova Lodewijk van den Berg Igor Volk Vostok 6 STS 51B Soyuz T-12 Charles Walker Donald Williams Boris Yegorov STS 41D, STS 51D, STS 61B STS 51D, STS 34 Voskhod 1 Vyacheslav Zhudov Soyuz 23 This poster commemorates the 7th Planetary Congress of the Association of Space Explorers (ASE).
    [Show full text]