DOCSLIB.ORG

New York Agreement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New York Agreement New York Agreement Agreement Between the Republic of Indonesia and the Kingdom of the Netherlands Concerning West New Guinea (West Irian) (As signed at the United Nations Headquarters, New York, August 15, 1962 ) The Republic of Indonesia and the Kingdom of the Netherlands, Having in mind the interests and welfare of the people of the territory of West New Guinea (West Irian) hereinafter referred to as "the territory", Desirous of settling their dispute regarding the territory, Now, therefore, agree as follows: RATIFICATION OF AGREEMENT AND RESOLUTION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE UNITED NATIONS Article I After the present Agreement between Indonesia and the Netherlands has been signed and ratified by both Contracting Parties, Indonesia and the Netherlands will jointly sponsor a draft resolution in the United Nations under the terms of which the General Assembly of the United Nations takes note of the present Agreement, acknowledges the role conferred upon the Secretary-General of the United Nations therein, and authorizes him to carry out the tasks entrusted to him therein. TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATION Article II After the adoption of the resolution referred to in article I, the Netherlands will transfer administration of the territory to a United Nations Temporary Executive Authority (UNTEA) established by and under the jurisdiction of the Secretary-General upon the arrival of the United Nations Administrator appointed in accordance with article IV. The UNTEA will in turn transfer the administration to Indonesia in accordance with article XII. UNITED NATIONS ADMINISTRATION Article III In order to facilitate the transfer of administration to the UNTEA after the adoption of the resolution by the General Assembly, the Netherlands will invite the Secretary-General to send a representative to consult briefly with the Netherlands Governor of the territory prior to the latter's departure. The Netherlands Governor will depart prior to the arrival of the United Nations Administrator. Article IV A United Nations Administrator, acceptable to Indonesia and the Netherlands, will be appointed by the Secretary-General. Article V The United Nation Administrator, as chief executive officer of the UNTEA, will have full authority under the direction of the Secretary-General to administer the territory for the period of the UNTEA administration in accordance with the terms of the present Agreement. Article VI 1. The United Nations flag will be flown during the period of the United Nations administration. 2. With regard to the flying of the Indonesian and Netherlands flags, it is agreed that this matter will be determined by agreement between the Secretary-General and the respective Governments. Article VII The Secretary-General will provide the UNTEA with such security forces as the United Nations Administrator deems necessary; such forces will primarily supplement existing Papuan (West Irianese) police in the task of maintaining law and order. The Papuan Volunteer Corps, which on the arrival of the United Nations Administrator will cease being part of the Netherlands armed forces, and the Indonesian armed forces in the territory will be under the authority of, and at the disposal of, the Secretary-General for the same purpose. The United Nations Administrator will, to the extent feasible, use the Papuan (West Irianese) police as a United Nations security force to maintain law and order and, at his discretion, use Indonesian armed forces. The Netherlands armed forces will be repatriated as rapidly as possible and while still in the territory will be under the authority of the UNTEA. Article VIII The United Nations Administrator will send periodic reports to the Secretary-General on the principal aspects of the implementation of the present Agreement. The Secretary-General will submit full reports to Indonesia and the Netherlands and may submit, at his discretion, reports to the General Assembly or to all United Nations Members. FIRST PHASE OF THE UNTEA ADMINISTRATION Article IX The United Nations Admlnistrator will replace as rapidly as possible top Netherlands officials as defined in annex A with non-Netherlands, non-Indonesian officials during the first phase of the UNTEA administration which will be completed on 1 May 1963. The United Nations Administrator will be authorized to employ on a temporary basis all Netherlands officials other than top Netherlands officials defined in annex A, who wish to serve the UNTEA, in accordance with such terms and conditions as the Secretary-General may specify. As many Papuans (West Irianese) as possible will be brought into administrative and technical positions. To fill the remaining required posts, the UNTEA will have authority to employ personnel provided by Indonesia. Salary rates prevailing in the territory will be maintained. Article X Immediately after the transfer of administration to the UNTEA, the UNTEA will widely publicize and explain the terms of the present Agreement, and will inform the population concerning the transfer of administration to Indonesia and the provisions for the act of self-determination as set out in the present Agreement. Article XI To the extent that they are consistent with the letter and spirit of the present Agreement, existing laws and regulations will remain in effect. The UNTEA will have power to promulgate new laws and regulations or amend them within the spirit and framework of the present Agreement. The representative councils will be consulted prior to the issuance of new laws and regulations or the amendment of existing laws. SECOND PHASE Article XII The United Nations Administrator will have discretion to transfer all or part of the administration to Indonesia at any time after the first phase of the UNTEA administration. The UNTEA's authority will lease at the moment of transfer of full administrative control to Indonesia. Article XIII United Nations security forces will be replaced by Indonesian security forces after the first phase of the UNTEA administration. All United Nations security forces will be withdrawn upon the transfer of administration to Indonesia. INDONESIAN ADMINISTRATION AND SELF-DETERMINATION Article XIV After the transfer of full administrative responsibility to Indonesia, Indonesian national laws and regulations will in principle be applicable in the territory, it being understood that they be consistent with the rights and freedoms guaranteed to the inhabitants under the terns of the present Agreement. New laws and regulations or amendments to the existing ones can be enacted within the spirit of the present Agreement. The representative councils will be consulted as appropriate. Article XV After the transfer of full administrative responsibility to Indonesia, the primary task of Indonesia will be further intensification of the education of the people, of the combating of illiteracy, and of the advancement of their social, cultural and economic development. Efforts also will be made, in accordance with present Indonesian practice, to accelerate the participation of the people in local government through periodic elections. Any aspects relating to the act of free choice will be governed by the terms of this Agreement. Article XVI At the time of the transfer of full administrative responsibility to Indonesia a number of United Nations experts, as deemed adequate by the Secretary-General after consultation with Indonesia, will be designated to remain wherever their duties require their presence. Their duties will, prior to the arrival of the United Nations Representative, who will participate at the appropriate time in the arrangements for self-determination, be limited to advising on, and assisting in, preparations for carrying out the provisions for self-determination except in so far as Indonesia and the Secretary-General may agree upon their performing other expert functions. They will be responsible to the Secretary-General for the carrying out of their duties. Article XVII Indonesia will invite the Secretary-General to appoint a Representative who, together with a staff made up, inter alia, of experts referred to in article XVI, will carry out the Secretary- General's responsibilities to advise, assist and participate in arrangements which are the responsibility of Indonesia for the act of free choice. The Secretary-General will, at the proper time, appoint the United Nations Representative in order that he and his staff may assume their duties in the territory one year prior to the date of self-determination. Such additional staff as the United Nations Representative might feel necessary will be determined by the Secretary-General after consultations with Indonesia. The United Nations Representative and his staff will have the same freedom of movement as provided for the personnel referred to in article XVI. Article XVIII Indonesia will make arrangements, with the assistance and participation of the United Nation Representative and his staff, to give the people of the territory the opportunity to exercise freedom of choice. Such arrangements will include: (a) Consultations (Musyawarah) with the representative councils on procedures l and appropriate methods to be followed for ascertaining the freely expressed will of the population; (b) The determination of the actual date of the exercise of free choice within the period established by the present Agreement; (c) Formulation of the questions in such a way as to permit the inhabitants to decide (a) whether they wish to remain with Indonesia; or (b) whether they wish to sever their ties with Indonesia; (d) The eligibility of all adults, male and female, not foreign nationals, to participate in the act of self-determination to be carried out in accordance with international practice, who are resident at the time of the signing of the present Agreement and at the time of the act of self- determination, including those residents who departed after 1945 and who return to the territory to resume residence after the termination of Netherlands administration. Article XIX The United Nations Representative will report to the Secretary-General on the arrangements arrived at for freedom of choice. Article XX The act of self-determination will be completed before the end of 1969.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The West Papua Dilemma Leslie B
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2010 The West Papua dilemma Leslie B. Rollings University of Wollongong Recommended Citation Rollings, Leslie B., The West Papua dilemma, Master of Arts thesis, University of Wollongong. School of History and Politics, University of Wollongong, 2010. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/3276 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact Manager Repository Services: [email protected]. School of History and Politics University of Wollongong THE WEST PAPUA DILEMMA Leslie B. Rollings This Thesis is presented for Degree of Master of Arts - Research University of Wollongong December 2010 For Adam who provided the inspiration. TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION................................................................................................................................ i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................. ii ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................... iii Figure 1. Map of West Papua......................................................................................................v SUMMARY OF ACRONYMS ....................................................................................................... vi INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • The Indonesian Coin Strategy: Failures and Alternative Approaches in Overcoming the Papuan Insurgency
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 2015-12 The Indonesian coin strategy: failures and alternative approaches in overcoming the Papuan insurgency Afriandi, Djon Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/47944 NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS THE INDONESIAN COIN STRATEGY: FAILURES AND ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES IN OVERCOMING THE PAPUAN INSURGENCY by Djon Afriandi December 2015 Thesis Advisor: Douglas Borer Second Reader: George Lober Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704–0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington, DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED (Leave blank) December 2015 Master’s thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS THE INDONESIAN COIN STRATEGY: FAILURES AND ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES IN OVERCOMING THE PAPUAN INSURGENCY 6. AUTHOR(S) Djon Afriandi 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Social and Political Sciences
    Journal of Social and Political Sciences Mulyadi, and Risman, Helda. (2020), The 1962 Military Confrontation on Salvaging West Papua: An Analysis on War Theory. In: Journal of Social and Political Sciences, Vol.3, No.4, 1092-1099. ISSN 2615-3718 DOI: 10.31014/aior.1991.03.04.240 The online version of this article can be found at: https://www.asianinstituteofresearch.org/ Published by: The Asian Institute of Research The Journal of Social and Political Sciences is an Open Access publication. It may be read, copied, and distributed free of charge according to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. The Asian Institute of Research Social and Political Sciences is a peer-reviewed International Journal. The journal covers scholarly articles in the fields of Social and Political Sciences, which include, but not limited to, Anthropology, Government Studies, Political Sciences, Sociology, International Relations, Public Administration, History, Philosophy, Arts, Education, Linguistics, and Cultural Studies. As the journal is Open Access, it ensures high visibility and the increase of citations for all research articles published. The Journal of Social and Political Sciences aims to facilitate scholarly work on recent theoretical and practical aspects of Social and Political Sciences. The Asian Institute of Research Journal of Social and Political Sciences Vol.3, No.4, 2020: 1092-1099 ISSN 2615-3718 Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved DOI: 10.31014/aior.1991.03.04.240 The 1962 Military Confrontation on Salvaging West Papua: An Analysis on War Theory Mulyadi1, Helda Risman2 1 Total War Strategy Post Graduate Student, Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia 2 Secretary of the Total War Strategy Study Program, Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia Correspondence: Mulyadi, Total war strategy post graduate student, Indonesia Defense University, Bogor, Indonesia.
    [Show full text]
  • Western New Guinea
    Western New Guinea West Papua" redirects here. For the Indonesian province with the same name, see West Papua (province). Western New Guinea is the Indonesian western half of the island of New Guinea and consists of two provinces, Papua and West Papua. It was previously known by various names, including Netherlands New Guinea (1895–1 October 1962), West New Guinea (1 October 1962–1 May 1963), West Irian (1 May 1963–1973), and Irian Jaya (1973–2000). The incorporation of western New Guinea into Indonesia remains controversial with human rights non- governmental organizations (NGO), including some supporters in the United States Congress and other bodies, as well as many of the territory's indigenous population. Many indigenous inhabitants and human rights NGOs refer to it as West Papua. Western New Guinea was annexed by Indonesia under the 1969 Act of Free Choice in accord with the controversial 1962 New York Agreement. During the rule of President Suharto from 1965 to 1998, human rights and other advocates criticized Indonesian government policies in the province as repressive, and the area received relatively little attention in Indonesia's development plans. During the Reformasi period from 1998 to 2001, Papua and other Indonesian provinces received greater regional autonomy. In 2001, a law was passed granting "Special Autonomy" status to Papua, although many of the law's requirements have either not been implemented or have been only minimally implemented.[1] In 2003, the Indonesian central government declared that the province would be split into three provinces: Papua Province, Central Irian Jaya Province, and West Irian Jaya Province.
    [Show full text]
  • Tensions Between Sovereignty and Self-Determination Principles in the UN
    Tensions between Sovereignty and Self-Determination Principles in the UN UN’s Ambiguity in relation to the West Papua Self-Determination Claims Syanthy Christianty Political Science- Global Politics and Societal Change One-year master 15 credits Spring Semester/2020 Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Kristian Steiner Abstract Sovereignty and self-determination are two principles accepted by UN in the UN Charter and resolutions. The aim of this thesis is to analyze the tensions between sovereignty and self- determination principles in the UN and to increase understanding of how these tensions might have led to ambiguity in UN policy toward the West Papua case. The thesis identifies that there are tensions between those two principles in the UN resolutions. The tensions cause ambiguity in the UN when they are involving in self-determination cases outside the classical colonial context. The argument will be strengthened by conducting a single case study analysis on West Papua self- determination claim. As one of the self-determination claims outside the classical colonial context, the UN role when being involved in the case is argued to be lack of response and ambiguous. It concludes that the ambiguity of the UN when involved in the West Papua self-determination claim is resulted from the tensions between sovereignty and self-determination principles in the UN resolutions. Keywords: Sovereignty, Self-determination, Classical colonial context, Unilateral Secession, West Papua Word Count: 16,462 Table of contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 A brief overview
    [Show full text]
  • (INDONESIAN WEST NEW GUINEA) 1968 to 1969 John Saltford
    UNITED NATIONS INVOLVEMENT WITH THE ACT OF SELF-DETERMINATION IN WEST IRIAN (INDONESIAN WEST NEW GUINEA) 1968 TO 1969 John Saltford Introduction This paper, based mainly upon previously classified United Nations documents, will seek to re-examine the events surrounding the Act of Free Choice which took place in West New Guinea in July and August 1969. In particular, I wish to look at the role of the United Nations and consider whether or not it fulfilled its responsibilities towards the Papuan people. The origins of UN involvement in West New Guinea begin with the formation in 1949 of the UN Commission on Indonesia. This set up the "Round Table Conference" at The Hague which resulted in the agreement to transfer sovereignty from the Dutch to an Indonesian federation led by President Sukarno. During the negotiations, the Netherlands had insisted on retaining sovereignty over West New Guinea, a position condemned by Indonesia as the continuance of Dutch colonialism and a "troublemaking anachronism."1 The Hague argued the West 1 Memo of a conversation in Washington between William Lacy (Assistant Chief of Staff Southeast Asian Affairs), Jacob Beam (American Consul General designate at Batavia), and Soedjatmoko (representative of the Indonesian Republic), September 14,1949, in US Foreign Relations 1949, vol. VII, Indonesia (Washington, DC: Department of State Printing Office). Indonesia 69 (April 2000) 72 John Saitford Papuans had little or no connection with the Asians of Indonesia. They also claimed that they had only administered West New Guinea from Java because they did not consider it practical to appoint a separate governor and administration for a territory with only a small Dutch presence.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesian W Est New Guinea
    U nited Nations Involvement W ith the Act of Self-Determination in W est Irian (Indonesian W est New G uinea) 1968 to 1969 John Saltford Introduction This paper, based mainly upon previously classified United Nations documents, will seek to re-examine the events surrounding the Act of Free Choice which took place in West New Guinea in July and August 1969. In particular, I wish to look at the role of the United Nations and consider whether or not it fulfilled its responsibilities towards the Papuan people. The origins of UN involvement in West New Guinea begin with the formation in 1949 of the UN Commission on Indonesia. This set up the "Round Table Conference" at The Hague which resulted in the agreement to transfer sovereignty from the Dutch to an Indonesian federation led by President Sukarno. During the negotiations, the Netherlands had insisted on retaining sovereignty over West New Guinea, a position condemned by Indonesia as the continuance of Dutch colonialism and a "troublemaking anachronism."1 The Hague argued the West 1 Memo of a conversation in Washington between William Lacy (Assistant Chief of Staff Southeast Asian Affairs), Jacob Beam (American Consul General designate at Batavia), and Soedjatmoko (representative of the Indonesian Republic), September 14,1949, in US Foreign Relations 1949, vol. VII, Indonesia (Washington, DC: Department of State Printing Office). Indonesia 69 (April 2000) 72 John Saltford Papuans had little or no connection with the Asians of Indonesia. They also claimed that they had only administered West New Guinea from Java because they did not consider it practical to appoint a separate governor and administration for a territory with only a small Dutch presence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Independence of Indonesia
    ௐ 1 ഇ! ࢱ 1-39! 2020 ѐ/ߋ؞ཱི !ס έ៉઼ᅫࡁտ؞Ώ! ௐ 16 Taiwan International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 1-39 Spring 2020 * 印尼的獨立建國 ߉ϒዡ ර̂ጯϔ୉ְચၱ൴णጯրି଱ڌ ၡ ࢋ ĂڼԧࣇА૟̬௜Оκϔ୉͹ཌྷ۞൴णĂତ඾аᜪఈᜋ۞തϔ௚ ޢٙणฟ۞ࢭ׻Ă౵ޢο፾ϲކᑭෛޢГֽ҂၅͟ώ۞࢕ְҫᅳĂ൒ ྅ጬ੽ֽઇඕԍĄڠ .ͽγϹ౉श vs ă͟ώ࢕ְҫᅳă፾ϲࢭ׻ڼᙯᔣෟĈОκϔ୉͹ཌྷăఈᜋ۞തϔ௚ ᄃण୕ķጯఙࡁ੅ົĂέΔĂڶέ៉઼ᅫࡁտጯົ͹ᏱĶ˼ᒩѐֽ۞Оκů൴णனٺ൴ܑ * 2019 ѐ 9 ͡ 28 ͟Ą઼ϲέ៉रቑ̂ጯဦ३ᐡ७ડტЪ̂ሁ 508 ົᛉވĄ ăௐ 1 ഇĞ2020/ߋ؞ཱིğס Įέ៉઼ᅫࡁտ؞Ώįௐ 16 2 No, Your Majesty, this is not your country. It is our country, our homeland. One day it will be free, free forever- we have sworn it! Ernest Douwes DekkerĞMcMahon, 1981: 30ğ Though life in Indonesia was filled with hardship during Japanese military rule, Japan was a model for us in one way, which was that Asia too could defeat Western colonialism. This was an important thing we learned from Japan. Before then, it had never entered our minds. Pramoedya Ananta ToerĞISHP, n.d.ğ With the arrival of the Japanese just about everyone was full of hope, except for those who had worked in the service of the Dutch. Pramoedya Ananta ToerĞWikipedia, 2019ağ Is Liberty and freedom only for certain favored peoples of this world? Indonesians will never understand why it is, for instance, wrong for the Germans to rule the Holland if it is right for the Dutch to rule Indonesia. In either case the right to rule rests on pure force and not on the sanction of the population. SukarnoĞMcMahon, 1981: 95ğ On examination we find that the autonomy offered us by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Papua Question: Historical Contexts and International Dimensions
    ISSUE: 2019 No. 91 ISSN 2335-6677 RESEARCHERS AT ISEAS – YUSOF ISHAK INSTITUTE ANALYSE CURRENT EVENTS Singapore |31 October 2019 The Papua Question: Historical Contexts and International Dimensions Leo Suryadinata* EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • In August and September 2019, there were demonstrations and riots in Papua1 organized by pro-independence groups demanding a referendum. These were triggered by an attack on Papuan students by an Indonesian mob in Surabaya, which led to violent unrest which spread quickly and left many dead or wounded. • Some have raised the prospect of Papua going the way of East Timor, but the two situations are significantly different. Indonesia’s annexation of East Timor during Suharto’s rule was never recognized by the UN, whereas Papua was recognized by the UN as part of Indonesian territory in 1969. • Opposition to Indonesian rule has simmered ever since Papua was incorporated into Indonesia, but it became more energized by the greater democratic space in the post- Suharto era. As more Papuan youths received better education, they became more politicized. • Papuan nationalists have made some progress in internationalizing the Papuan problem, particularly in gaining support from the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) countries, which in turn have raised the Papuan issue at the UN annually. • Political unrest and controversy over human rights violations arising from the Papuan question will be a difficult challenge for President Jokowi during his second term. However, the prospects for West Papuan independence appear to be bleak. Papua is low on the international community’s agenda, the Papuans are divided, and in the unlikely event of a self-determination exercise, the growing numbers of non- Papuan migrants in the province would be a huge obstacle.
    [Show full text]
  • SAVING INDONESIA: Comparative American, British, and Canadian Policy Toward Indonesia, 1961-1965
    UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCE TRN419 SAVING INDONESIA: Comparative American, British, and Canadian Policy Toward Indonesia, 1961-1965 Maria Monica Layarda Supervised by Professor Robert Bothwell & Julie Gilmour 2017 TRN419|Saving Indonesia, 1961-1965 *The author is grateful for the guidance, encouragement, and inspiration from her course instructors, Professor Robert Bothwell and Julie Gilmour, throughout the writing of this paper. A special thanks is due to historian David Webster who answered this author’s substantive and research methods queries in writing (on Dec 6-7, 2016) and via Skype interview (on March 21, 2017) and to Dr. Dirks who diligently provided help to navigate various archival databases, especially in requesting documents through the rather complex Canadian national archive. The author is also indebted to Trinity and Robarts librarians who provided general research help and advice. 2 Maria Monica Layarda The geographical broadening of the academic world and waves of archival opening throughout the 1990s have led to the globalization of Cold War narrative.1 While Cold War historians—orthodox and revisionist alike—were once focused on the American-Soviet rivalry on the European theatre, Cold War narrative has expanded to encompass the periphery. The ensuing growth of Third World historiography has also largely revised the conventional portrayal of the Third World actors from being “victims” into active players who influenced and constrained the principal belligerents. In many cases, these “alleged puppets were less victims than puppeteers”.2 This was especially true in Asia where local agency was responsible for turning the cold hostility into a hot conflict, bringing the lead actors into the Asian theatre.
    [Show full text]
  • Papua New Guinea Border: Irianese Nationalism
    THE INDONESIA - PAPUA NEW GUINEA BORDER: IRIANESE NATIONALISM AND SMALL STATE DIPLOMACY R.J. May (Ed.) Working Paper No 2 Department of Political and Social Change Research School of Pacific Studies Australian National University August 1979 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-publication entry The Indonesia - Papua New Guinea border (Working paper; no . 2) Includes bibliographical references ISBN 0 908160 33 x 1. Indonesia - Foreign relations - Papua New Guinea . 2. Papua New Guinea - Foreign relations - Indonesia . I. May, Ronald J. , ed . (Series : Australian National University, Canberra . Research School of Pacific Studies . Dept . of Political and Social Change . Working paper; no . 2 ISSN 0157-2776) 327'.598'095 C 0 N T E N T S Preface i A historical perspective Peter Hastings 1 Problems of international borders with particular reference to the current re-negotiation of the Indonesia - Papua New Guinea agreement concerning administrative border arrangements J.R.V. Pre scott 12 The 'Jusuf Line' : beginnings of a more fruitful phase? Rex Mo rtimer 33 Does Indonesia have expansionist designs on Papua New Guinea? J.A.C. Mackie 42 Papua New Guinea perceptions on the border ; internal pressures and policies. Kwasi Nyamekye and Ralph Premdas 65 Living wi th a lion . Public at_ti tudes and private feelings R.J. May 80 Border deve lopment: a 'political necessity' again J.M. Herlihy 108 Appendix I Agreement between the government of Australia (acting on its own behalf and on behalf of the government of Papua New Guinea) and the
    [Show full text]
  • Papua's Insecurity: State Failure in the Indonesian Periphery
    Policy Studies 73 Papua’s Insecurity State Failure in the Indonesian Periphery Bobby Anderson Papua’s Insecurity State Failure in the Indonesian Periphery About the East-West Center The East-West Center promotes better relations and understanding among the people and nations of the United States, Asia, and the Pacific through cooperative study, research, and dialogue. Established by the US Congress in 1960, the Center serves as a resource for infor- mation and analysis on critical issues of common concern, bringing people together to exchange views, build expertise, and develop policy options. The Center’s 21-acre Honolulu campus, adjacent to the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, is located midway between Asia and the US main- land and features research, residential, and international conference facilities. The Center’s Washington, DC, office focuses on preparing the United States for an era of growing Asia Pacific prominence. The Center is an independent, public, nonprofit organization with funding from the US government, and additional support provided by private agencies, individuals, foundations, corporations, and govern- ments in the region. Policy Studies an East-West Center series Series Editors Dieter Ernst and Marcus Mietzner Description Policy Studies presents original research on pressing economic and political policy challenges for governments and industry across Asia, About the East-West Center and for the region's relations with the United States. Written for the The East-West Center promotes better relations and understanding policy and business communities, academics, journalists, and the in- among the people and nations of the United States, Asia, and the formed public, the peer-reviewed publications in this series provide Pacific through cooperative study, research, and dialogue.
    [Show full text]