DOCSLIB.ORG

Impact of High Divorce Rate on Socioeconomic Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Impact of High Divorce Rate on Socioeconomic Development IMPACT OF HIGH DIVORCE RATE ON SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. CASE STUDY OF LUSAKA DISTRICT SELECTED MATERO CONSITTUENCY. BY WAZILI RAMZAAN PHIRI STUDENT NUMBER : 005-027 DISSERTATION SUBMITTED AS PARTIAL FULFILMENT FOR THE AWARD OF A BACHELOR OF DEVELOPMENT DEGREE OF CAVENDISH UNIVERSITY ZAMBIA 2020 1 | P a g e ABSTRACT The main aim of the research was to find out the impact of high divorce rate on socioeconomic development in Lusaka District selected Matero Constituency. The study further investigated the alternative measurements that was used, the study also assessed the challenges that divorced families face in society. In addition, the study investigated the measures to overcome the challenges being faced by divorced families in Lusaka district selected Matero and other parts of the district. A multiple-case study was used which involved application of qualitative and quantitative methods. A sample of 50 participants was drawn from selected areas of the district. The parents and community youths were selected purposively while community stakeholders as while as government stakeholders were selected using simple random sampling. The findings of the study revealed that parents perceived the effect of high divorce rate as a major challenge in the discipline of marriage as most divorced children suffer socially, economically, educationally, mentally and psychologically problems. In as much as we want our marriage to be perfect, discipline and trust is also needed to make it work. The divorce has led to a high level of sufferings in society. The findings on mitigation of challenges were, the marriage counseling, Financing program, socio-economic assistance,Churches advice and empowerment skills and to provide them with knowledge and skills to enhance the administration of discipline, the different ministries insisting on devorced families to adhere on the marriage roles. In light of the findings, the study recommend that marriage should have guidance and counselling departments with qualified counsellors to help in married couples to establish and strengthen the two couples rights and train them on the importance of good marriage discipline. Finally, further studies to be conducted on, the importance of good marriage relation to development. 2 | P a g e DECLARATION I declare that the work presented in this dissertation entitled “The Impact of High Divorce rate on Socioeconomic Development”, is to the best of my knowledge and believe it is my own work and that it is original. The dissertation contains no material that has been accepted for an award of a degree or Diploma by Cavendish University Zambia or any other institution. All the works that are not mine have been acknowledged. Signed:………………………………………. Date:……………………………………….. 3 | P a g e CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL This dissertation of Wazili Ramzaan Phiri has been approved as the partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of a degree in Development Studies by Cavendish University of Zambia. Examiners’ Signatures Signed…………………………………….Date………………………………… Signed……………………………………Date…………………………………. Signed……………………………………Date………………………………… 4 | P a g e ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I am sincerely thankful to almighty God/Allah who has seen me through this major task of writing this thesis. My sincere gratitude goes to Him for granting me the much needed energy, finance and good health to complete this thesis. I would also like to record my deepest appreciation to the Faculty of Arts and Social sciences, Faculty of defence, the School of Graduate Studies and Research of Cavendish University for granting me the opportunity to undertake this research and for the generous skills support. Similarly, am very grateful to all those who contributed towards the success of this thesis. In writing this thesis, I heavily relied on the counsel and guidance of my supervisor, Mrs Nkhata Caroline. Special thanks goes to her for untiring guidance. Her brilliant grasp of the aim and content of this work led her to insightful comments, queries and suggestions that helped me a great deal. I am really grateful for her invaluable assistance, friendship and acts of mentorship. I very much appreciate her infinite patience, care, time and sustained devotion to this work. Iam sincerely grateful for her commitment and the time she accorded me during the writing of this thesis. I sincere acknowledge the support of my classmates and school mates: Salome Mulenga, Martha Syamalimba, Kennedy Nondo, Hamba Rhodah and Pured Mulenga . It was because of their friendly support that I successfully managed to confidently work on my thesis. My great thanks also goes to my Wife Aishah Namusokwe for her great support she gave me during the hard work of my thesis. Furthermore, Iam forever indebted to my Parents Finace Kambole, Ahmad Waziri, and Papa Shahid Motala for nurturing my academic potential. Thanks to my brothers and sisters: Rijah Ramsey, Waziri Waziri, Canstone.Y.Chishimba, Bakali Hillary and Anze Waziri who gave me both moral and financial support to complete this work. I wish to thank all parents, Lecturers and students that took part in this study and provided the useful information. 5 | P a g e Table of Contents DECLARATION ...................................................................................................................................... 3 CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL ........................................................................................................... 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ........................................................................................................................ 5 CHAPTER ONE ..................................................................................................................................... 10 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 10 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................................... 10 1.2 Statement of the problem .............................................................................................................. 11 1.3 Purpose of the study ........................................................................................................................ 12 1.4 Objectives of the study ................................................................................................................... 12 The general objective ............................................................................................................................ 12 1.5 Specific of Objective ....................................................................................................................... 12 1.6 Research questions (S) ................................................................................................................. 12 1.7 Significance of the study ................................................................................................................. 13 1.8 Rationale ......................................................................................................................................... 13 1.9 Limitations ..................................................................................................................................... 13 1.11 Scope of the Study ....................................................................................................................... 14 1.12 Operational definitions .................................................................................................................. 14 CHAPTER TWO ...................................................................................................................................... 15 2.1 Literature Review.......................................................................................................................... 15 2.2 The concept of divorce .................................................................................................................... 15 2.3 Basic concept of divorce ................................................................................................................. 16 Legal separation .................................................................................................................................... 16 Marital Property .................................................................................................................................... 16 Spousal Support .................................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 An increase of divorce cases in different parts of Zambia ........................................................... 17 2.5 Divorce Rates in Lusaka district : Subdivision. .............................................................................. 19 2.6 Involvement of Zambian institutions on high divorce rate ........................................................... 23 2.7 Causes of divorce rate in Lusaka .................................................................................................. 24 2.8 Gender based violence contributing to high divorce rate ............................................................... 24 2.9 Effects of divorce on children ....................................................................................................... 25 2.10 Impact of divorce on socio-economic and education
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zambia Page 1 of 16
    Zambia Page 1 of 16 Zambia Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2002 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 31, 2003 Zambia is a republic governed by a president and a unicameral national assembly. Since 1991 generally free and fair multiparty elections have resulted in the victory of the Movement for Multi -Party Democracy (MMD). In December 2001, Levy Mwanawasa of the MMD was elected president, and his party won 69 out of 150 elected seats in the National Assembly. The MMD's use of government resources during the campaign raised questions over the fairness of the elections. Although noting general transparency during the voting, domestic and international observer groups cited irregularities in the registration process and problems in the tabulation of the election results. Opposition parties challenged the election result in court, and court proceedings remained ongoing at year's end. The Constitution mandates an independent judiciary, and the Government generally respected this provision; however, the judicial system was hampered by lack of resources, inefficiency, and reports of possible corruption. The police, divided into regular and paramilitary units operated under the Ministry of Home Affairs, had primary responsibility for maintaining law and order. The Zambia Security and Intelligence Service (ZSIS), under the Office of the President, was responsible for intelligence and internal security. Members of the security forces committed numerous, and at times serious, human rights abuses. Approximately 60 percent of the labor force worked in agriculture, although agriculture contributed only 22 percent to the gross domestic product. Economic growth slowed to 3 percent for the year, partly as a result of drought in some agricultural areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Observing the 2001 Zambia Elections
    SPECIAL REPORT SERIES THE CARTER CENTER WAGING PEACE ◆ FIGHTING DISEASE ◆ BUILDING HOPE OBSERVING THE 2001 ZAMBIA ELECTIONS THE CARTER CENTER STRIVES TO RELIEVE SUFFERING BY ADVANCING PEACE AND HEALTH WORLDWIDE; IT SEEKS TO PREVENT AND RESOLVE CONFLICTS, ENHANCE FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY, AND PROTECT AND PROMOTE HUMAN RIGHTS WORLDWIDE. THE CARTER CENTER NDINDI OBSERVING THE 2001 ZAMBIA ELECTIONS OBSERVING THE 2001 ZAMBIA ELECTIONS FINAL REPORT THE CARTER CENTER The Democracy Program One Copenhill Atlanta, GA 30307 (404) 420-5188 FAX (404) 420-5196 WWW.CARTERCENTER.ORG OCTOBER 2002 1 THE CARTER CENTER NDI OBSERVING THE 2001 ZAMBIA ELECTIONS 2 THE CARTER CENTER NDINDI OBSERVING THE 2001 ZAMBIA ELECTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Carter Center Election Observation Delegation and Staff ............................................................... 5 Terms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................................. 7 Foreword ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 10 Acknowledgments............................................................................................................................. 15 Background ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In the Past 24 Hrs, There Were 868 New Confirmed Cases, 2 Deaths and 183 Global Numbers Recoveries
    ZAMBIA SITUATION REPORT NO. 107 th th Disease Outbreak: COVID-19 Response start date: 30 January, 2020 Outbreak Declared:18 March, 2020 Report date: Monday 11th January 2021 Prepared by: MOH/ZNPHI/WHO Correspondence:[email protected] 1. SITUATION UPDATE Cases this week (11th - 17th Jan): 868 1.1 CURRENT CASE NUMBERS (as of 09:00 hours CAT) • In the past 24 hrs, there were 868 new confirmed cases, 2 deaths and 183 Global Numbers recoveries. (Source: JHU) 90,443,644 Confirmed • Cumulative number of confirmed COVID-19 cases recorded to date is 28,596 1,938,155 Deaths 50,173,557 Recoveries with 471 deaths (CFR=1.659%) and 20,781 recoveries (72.67% recovered). Africa Numbers • Of the 471 total deaths among the confirmed cases, 166 have been classified as Source: Africa CDC) 3,051,036 Confirmed COVID-19 deaths (CFR=0.58%) and 305 as associated deaths. See Annex 72,705 Deaths 2, 466,432 Recoveries 1 for definitions • There are currently 7,344 active cases: of these, 224 are hospitalised (with 149 on Oxygen therapy and 19 in critical condition); 7,120 patients are under community management. 2. EPIDEMIOLOGICAL HIGHLIGHTS (By Epi-week) 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 Recorded Number 2000 1000 0 5-11Oct 7-13Sep 3 -Aug39 2 -2Nov8 4 -410Jan 12-18 Oct 19-25 Oct 13-19 Apr 20-26 Apr 21-27 Sep 9 -915Nov 15 15 -21Jun 6 -612 Apr 16-22 Mar 23-29 Mar 14 14 Sep-20 -713Dec 1 - 17 Jun 13 13 July-19 8 -814 Jun 11 11 - 17 Jan 11-17 May 18-24 May 25-31 May 6 6 12July - 10 10 - 16 Aug 17 17 - 23 Aug 24 - 30 Aug 22 22 -28 Jun 16 16 - 22 Nov 23 - 29 Nov 4 - 4 10 May
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya - Caucus Parliamentary Parliamentary National Assembly of Kenya National Assembly Hon
    AFRICA 2019-2020 THE ICCF GROUP INTERNATIONALCONSERVATION.ORG COPYRIGHT INTERNATIONAL CONSERVATION CAUCUS FOUNDATION MISSION THE MOST ADVANCED TO ADVANCE SOLUTION IN CONSERVATION CONSERVATION GOVERNANCE BY WE BUILD POLITICAL WILL BUILDING The ICCF Group advances governments' leadership in conservation internationally by building political will POLITICAL WILL, within legislatures and supporting governments in the management of protected areas. PROVIDING ON-THE-GROUND CATALYZING CHANGE WITH KNOWLEDGE & EXPERTISE SOLUTIONS The ICCF Group supports political will by catalyzing strategic partnerships and knowledge sharing between policymakers and our extensive network. VISION TO PRESERVE THE WORLD'S MOST CRITICAL LANDSCAPES A WORLD The ICCF Group's international track record in legislative outcomes, public-private partnerships, & land WHERE management demonstrates that our unique model is emerging as a cost-effective, sustainable solution to PEOPLE AND conservation governance challenges. NATURE SUSTAIN AND NURTURE ONE ANOTHER 2019-2020 THE ICCF GROUP THE ICCF GROUP IN AFRICA EMPOWERING POLICYMAKERS &AND THE JUDICIARY The ICCF Group is working in East, Southern, and Central Africa to foster political will for conservation and support the sustainable management of natural resources. The ICCF Group has facilitated the establishment of parliamentary conservation caucuses in ten countries and is collaborating with each of these coalitions of policymakers to strengthen governance across several key natural resource sectors. The ICCF Group coordinates high-level political engagement with expertise on conservation strategies and solutions; facilitates interactions between U.S. and international policymakers, conservation organizations, and government agencies; and seeks to leverage and integrate resources in support of sustainable natural resource management policies. ICCF-supported caucuses enable, inform, and strengthen policymakers in their commitment to conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Registered Voters by Gender and Constituency
    REGISTERED VOTERS BY GENDER AND CONSTITUENCY % OF % OF SUB % OF PROVINCIAL CONSTITUENCY NAME MALES MALES FEMALES FEMALES TOTAL TOTAL KATUBA 25,040 46.6% 28,746 53.4% 53,786 8.1% KEEMBE 23,580 48.1% 25,453 51.9% 49,033 7.4% CHISAMBA 19,289 47.5% 21,343 52.5% 40,632 6.1% CHITAMBO 11,720 44.1% 14,879 55.9% 26,599 4.0% ITEZH-ITEZHI 18,713 47.2% 20,928 52.8% 39,641 5.9% BWACHA 24,749 48.1% 26,707 51.9% 51,456 7.7% KABWE CENTRAL 31,504 47.4% 34,993 52.6% 66,497 10.0% KAPIRI MPOSHI 41,947 46.7% 47,905 53.3% 89,852 13.5% MKUSHI SOUTH 10,797 47.3% 12,017 52.7% 22,814 3.4% MKUSHI NORTH 26,983 49.5% 27,504 50.5% 54,487 8.2% MUMBWA 23,494 47.9% 25,545 52.1% 49,039 7.4% NANGOMA 12,487 47.4% 13,864 52.6% 26,351 4.0% LUFUBU 5,491 48.1% 5,920 51.9% 11,411 1.7% MUCHINGA 10,072 49.7% 10,200 50.3% 20,272 3.0% SERENJE 14,415 48.5% 15,313 51.5% 29,728 4.5% MWEMBEZHI 16,756 47.9% 18,246 52.1% 35,002 5.3% 317,037 47.6% 349,563 52.4% 666,600 100.0% % OF % OF SUB % OF PROVINCIAL CONSTITUENCY NAME MALES MALES FEMALES FEMALES TOTAL TOTAL CHILILABOMBWE 28,058 51.1% 26,835 48.9% 54,893 5.4% CHINGOLA 34,695 49.7% 35,098 50.3% 69,793 6.8% NCHANGA 23,622 50.0% 23,654 50.0% 47,276 4.6% KALULUSHI 32,683 50.1% 32,614 49.9% 65,297 6.4% CHIMWEMWE 29,370 48.7% 30,953 51.3% 60,323 5.9% KAMFINSA 24,282 51.1% 23,214 48.9% 47,496 4.6% KWACHA 31,637 49.3% 32,508 50.7% 64,145 6.3% NKANA 27,595 51.9% 25,562 48.1% 53,157 5.2% WUSAKILE 23,206 50.5% 22,787 49.5% 45,993 4.5% LUANSHYA 26,658 49.5% 27,225 50.5% 53,883 5.3% ROAN 15,921 50.1% 15,880 49.9% 31,801 3.1% LUFWANYAMA 18,023 50.2%
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence Rates of the Common Non- Communicable Diseases and Their Risk Factors in Lusaka District, Zambia 2008
    Prevalence rates of the common non- communicable diseases and their risk factors in Lusaka district, Zambia 2008 Ministry of Health Zambia November 2008 Prevalence rates of the common non-communicable diseases and their risk factors in Lusaka district, Zambia 2008 Recommended citation Ministry of Health [Zambia] and World Health Organization Country Office [Zambia]. Prevalence rates of the common non-communicable diseases and their risk factors in Lusaka district, Zambia 2008. Lusaka, Zambia: Ministry of Health and World Health Organization. 2 CONTENTS Page ________________________________________________________________________ Tables 5 Figures 6 Preface 7 Acknowledgements 9 Executive summary 12 Abbreviations 17 1. Introduction 18 2. Literature review 20 3. Justification for Study and objectives 23 4. Materials and methods 24 4.1 Setting 24 4.2 Study Design 25 4.3 Eligibility criteria 25 4.4 Sample Size Determination 25 4.5 Sampling 27 4.6 Data Collection 29 4.7 Data Entry 32 4.8 Data Analysis 32 4.9 Ethical Consideration 32 5. Results 33 5.1 Demographics 33 5.2 Tobacco use 34 5.3 Alcohol consumption 36 5.4 Diet 38 5.5 Physical activity 38 5.6 Overweight or obese 44 5.7 Blood pressure 47 3 5.8 Impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes 50 5.9 Cholesterol 53 6. Discussion 55 6.1 Tobacco use 55 6.2 Alcohol consumption 56 6.3 Diet 57 6.4 Physical activity 58 6.5 Overweight or obese 59 6.6 Blood pressure 59 6.7 Impaired glucose tolerance or diabetes 60 6.8 Cholesterol 60 7. Possible limitations 62 8. Conclusions 63 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia FINAL REPORT EUROPEAN UNION ELECTION OBSERVATION
    Zambia FINAL REPORT GENERAL ELECTIONS 20 SEPTEMBER 2011 EUROPEAN UNION ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION This report was produced by the European Union Election Observation Mission to Zambia and presents the mission’s findings on the 20 September 2011 general elections. These views have not been adopted or in any way approved or should not be relied upon as a statement of the European Union. The European Union does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. European Union Election Observation Mission to Zambia Page 2 of 26 Final Report on the General Elections, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................... 3 II. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 6 III. POLITICAL BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................... 6 A. Political Context ................................................................................................................................. 6 B. Key Political Actors ........................................................................................................................... 6 IV. LEGAL ISSUES .............................................................................................................................. 7 A. Legal Framework ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Zambia Living Conditions Monitoring
    REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA LIVING CONDITIONS MONITORING SURVEY III 2002 ENUMERATORS INSTRUCTION MANUAL CENTRAL STATISTICAL OFFICE P.O. BOX 31908 LUSAKA, ZAMBIA. PHONE: 251377/251385/252575/251381/250195/253609/253578/253908 TEL/FAX: 252575/253578/253908/253468 1 Enumerator’s Instructions Manual – LCMS III THE LIVING CONDITIONS MONITORING SURVEY III (2002) ENUMERATOR'S INSTRUCTION MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE CHAPTER I - INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER II - LISTING PROCEDURE ........................................................................... 9 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Identification.......................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Summary of the SEA........................................................................................... 10 2.4 Sampling particulars............................................................................................. 10 2.5 Listing ................................................................................................................... 10 CHAPTER III - ENUMERATION................................................................................... 19 SECTION 1:HOUSEHOLD ROSTER............................................................................. 24 SECTION 2: MARITAL STATUS AND ORPHANHOOD...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL ASSEMBLY ZAMBIA PARLIAMENTARY CONSERVATION CAUCUS (Updated January 11, 2019) ​ ​
    NATIONAL ASSEMBLY ZAMBIA PARLIAMENTARY CONSERVATION CAUCUS (Updated January 11, 2019) ​ ​ Co-Chairs Hon. Ephraim Belemu (UPND – Mbabala) Hon. Anthony Kasandwe (PF – Bangweulu) Members 1. Hon. Stephen Kampyongo (PF- Shiwang’andu MP) 2. Hon. Nickson Chilangwa (PF – Kawambwa) 3. Hon. Mutinta Mazoka (UPND – Pemba) 4. Hon. Steve Chungu (PF – Luanshya) 5. Hon. Malozo Sichone (PF – Isoka) 6. Hon. Jean Kapata (PF – Mandevu) 7. Hon. Dora Siliya (PF – Petauke) 8. Hon. Princess Kasune (UPND – Keembe) 9. Hon. Pilila Jere (Indp – Lumezi) 10. Hon. Margaret Miti (PF – Vubwi) 11. Hon. Emerine Kabashi (PF – Luapula) 12. Hon. Maria Langa( PF Chilanga) 13. Hon. Mumbi J. C. Phiri (PF – Nominated) 14. Hon. Credo Nanjuwa (UPND – Mumbwa) 15. Hon. Njamba Machila (Indp – Mwembeshi) 16. Hon. Peter Daka (MMD – Musanzala) 17. Hon. Maxas Ng’onga (PF – Kaputa) 18. Hon. Martin Malama (PF – Kanchibiya) 19. Hon. Kapembwa Simbao (PF – Senga Hill) 20. Hon. Mwalimu Simfukwe (PF – Mbala PF) 21. Hon. Garry Nkombo (UPND – Mazabuka) 22. Hon. Cornelius Mweetwa (UPND – Choma) 23. Hon. Mbolowa Subulwa (Indp – Siaoma) 24. Hon. Chinga Miyutu (UPND – Kalabo Central) 25. Hon. Mwansa Mbulakulima (PF – Milengi) 26. Hon. Richard Musukwa (PF – Chililabombwe) 27. Hon. Gift Chiyalika (PF – Lufubu) 28. Hon. Mubika Mubika (UPND – Shangombo) 29. Hon. Brian Mundubile (PF – Mporokoso) 30. Hon. Makebi Zulu (PF – Malambo) 31. Hon. Mwimba H Malama (PF Mfuwe) 32. Hon. Davison Mung’andu(PF – Chama South) 33. Hon. Teddy J Kasongo (PF – Nominated) 34. Hon. Gift Sialubalo (PF – Nominated) 35. Hon. Emmanuel Mulenga (PF – Ndola Central) 36. Hon. Whiteson Banda (PF – Nakonde) 37. Hon. Chishi C. Kasanda (UPND – Chisamba) 38.
    [Show full text]
  • O the District Recorded a Total of 210 New Cases and 4 Deaths from 18Th-24Th March 2018, Compared to 256 Cases and 7 Deaths the Previous Week
    Ministry of Health Situational Report No. 160 Outbreak Name: Cholera Investigation start date: 4th October, 2017 Date of report: 25th March, 2018 Prepared by: MOH/ZNPHI/WHO 1. WEEK 12 SUMMARY (18th-24th MARCH 2018) Lusaka2. District: o The district recorded a total of 210 new cases and 4 deaths from 18th-24th March 2018, compared to 256 cases and 7 deaths the previous week. Of the 4 deaths recorded, 3 were community deaths. o The cumulative number of cases as of Saturday 24th March, 2018 was 4,7491 with 88 deaths o The weekly incidence rate was 9/100,000population (down from 11/100,000 the previous week), whereas the case fatality rate for week 12 was 1.91% (facility CFR=0.48%) Table 1: Summary of cases reported at CTCs in Lusaka District from 18th to 24th March 2018 CTC/CTU Total Admissions Total Deaths Cumulative Cases Cumulative Deaths Kanyama 55 0 1364 32 Chipata 9 0 1323 29 Matero 18 2 560 14 Chawama 24 1 641 6 Bauleni 0 0 68 0 Chelstone 0 0 88 4 Heroes 104 1 705 3 TOTAL 210 4 4749 88 Sub-district (total new cases) Cases by Area of Residence (# of cases) 1 Chipata (16) Chaisa (8), Chipata (2), Garden (1), Ngombe (2), Chazanga (2), Kalundu (1) 2 Matero (41) George (27), Matero (8), Zingalume (1), Lilanda (4), Chazanga (1) 3 Kanyama (64) Old Kanyama (28), John Laing (8), Garden House (14), Chibolya (3), Lusaka West (1), Kanyama West (1), Makeni (2), Makeni Villa (2), New Kanyama (1), Garden Park (1), Twin Park (1), Kanyama site and service (1), Chinika (1) 4 Chawama (22) New Chawama (1), Kuku (4), Misisi (5), Kamwala South (1), John Howard (5), Jack (2), Chawama (3), Kamwala (1) 5 Chelstone (63) Mtendere (19), Kalikiliki (18), Chainda (10), Kalingalinga (5), Kamanga (4), St Agnes (3), Chelstone (1), Chelstone Obama (1), Meanwood (2) Table 2: Distribution of cases reported in week 12 by area of residence 1 Four cases from Kanyama sub-district were reclassified as non-cases and excluded from the line list.
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of Mps 2(5).Xlsx
    ELECTORAL COMMISSION OF ZAMBIA 2016 GENERAL ELECTIONS CONSOLIDATED LIST OF ELECTED MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT FOR 156 CONSTITUENCIES NO. PROVINCE CODE PROVINCE DISTRICT CODE DISTRICT CONSTITUENCY CODE CONSTITUENCY FIRST NAME SURNAME INITIALS POLITICAL PARTY 1 101 CENTRAL 101001 CHIBOMBO 1010001 KATUBA Patricia MWASHINGWELE C UPND 2 101 CENTRAL 101001 CHIBOMBO 1010002 KEEMBE Princess KASUNE UPND 3 101 CENTRAL 101002 CHISAMBA 1010003 CHISAMBA Chushi KASANDA C UPND 4 101 CENTRAL 101003 CHITAMBO 1010004 CHITAMBO Remember MUTALE C PF 5 101 CENTRAL 101004 ITEZHITEZHI 1010005 ITEZHITEZHI Herbert SHABULA UPND 6 101 CENTRAL 101005 KABWE 1010006 BWACHA Sydney MUSHANGA PF 7 101 CENTRAL 101005 KABWE 1010007 KABWE CENTRAL Tutwa NGULUBE S PF 8 101 CENTRAL 101006 KAPIRI MPOSHI 1010008 KAPIRI MPOSHI Stanley KAKUBO K UPND 9 101 CENTRAL 101007 LUANO 1010009 MKUSHI SOUTH Davies CHISOPA PF 10 101 CENTRAL 101008 MKUSHI 1010010 MKUSHI NORTH Doreen MWAPE PF 11 101 CENTRAL 101009 MUMBWA 1010011 MUMBWA Credo NANJUWA UPND 12 101 CENTRAL 101009 MUMBWA 1010012 NANGOMA Boyd HAMUSONDE IND 13 101 CENTRAL 101010 NGABWE 1010013 LUFUBU Gift CHIYALIKA PF 14 101 CENTRAL 101011 SERENJE 1010014 MUCHINGA Howard KUNDA MMD 15 101 CENTRAL 101011 SERENJE 1010015 SERENJE Maxwell KABANDA M MMD 16 102 COPPERBELT 102001 CHILILABOMBWE 1020016 CHILILABOMBWE Richard MUSUKWA PF 17 102 COPPERBELT 102002 CHINGOLA 1020017 CHINGOLA Matthew NKHUWA PF 18 102 COPPERBELT 102002 CHINGOLA 1020018 NCHANGA Chilombo CHALI PF 19 102 COPPERBELT 102003 KALULUSHI 1020019 KALULUSHI Kampamba CHILUMBA M PF 20
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Allocation Model for The
    RESOURCE ALLOCATION MODEL FOR THE CONSTITUENCY DEVELOPMENT FUND Frank Kakungu Working Paper No. 13 December 2013 © Zambia Institute for Policy Analysis & Research 2013 i Abstract Detailed information on the location of those with the greatest need for publicly provided social services may be the most valuable information policy makers could use to allocate resources, plan and budget. More often than not, the emphasis has been on evaluating the distribution of poverty, as defined by income insufficiency, to inform resource allocation. Theoretically, measures of household wealth can be reflected by income, consumption or expenditure information. However, the collection of accurate income and consumption data requires extensive resources for household surveys. As regards, it may be more appropriate to focus on relative material and social deprivation than narrowly defined poverty. More importantly when one wants to evaluate the distribution of relative disadvantaged status between quite small geographic areas (e.g. Constituency), it is best to use data derived from the census, given that it is the most inclusive and representative of all household surveys. More overall, income from surveys are measures more reflective of short-run household’s wealth or living standard, inadequate for estimating long-run poverty accurately whereas other socio-economic and demographic census variables are regarded as much more reliable to estimate long-run deprivation. The research reported on in this paper has calculated a composite index of deprivation using
    [Show full text]