DOCSLIB.ORG

Registered Voters by Gender and Constituency

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Registered Voters by Gender and Constituency REGISTERED VOTERS BY GENDER AND CONSTITUENCY % OF % OF SUB % OF PROVINCIAL CONSTITUENCY NAME MALES MALES FEMALES FEMALES TOTAL TOTAL KATUBA 25,040 46.6% 28,746 53.4% 53,786 8.1% KEEMBE 23,580 48.1% 25,453 51.9% 49,033 7.4% CHISAMBA 19,289 47.5% 21,343 52.5% 40,632 6.1% CHITAMBO 11,720 44.1% 14,879 55.9% 26,599 4.0% ITEZH-ITEZHI 18,713 47.2% 20,928 52.8% 39,641 5.9% BWACHA 24,749 48.1% 26,707 51.9% 51,456 7.7% KABWE CENTRAL 31,504 47.4% 34,993 52.6% 66,497 10.0% KAPIRI MPOSHI 41,947 46.7% 47,905 53.3% 89,852 13.5% MKUSHI SOUTH 10,797 47.3% 12,017 52.7% 22,814 3.4% MKUSHI NORTH 26,983 49.5% 27,504 50.5% 54,487 8.2% MUMBWA 23,494 47.9% 25,545 52.1% 49,039 7.4% NANGOMA 12,487 47.4% 13,864 52.6% 26,351 4.0% LUFUBU 5,491 48.1% 5,920 51.9% 11,411 1.7% MUCHINGA 10,072 49.7% 10,200 50.3% 20,272 3.0% SERENJE 14,415 48.5% 15,313 51.5% 29,728 4.5% MWEMBEZHI 16,756 47.9% 18,246 52.1% 35,002 5.3% 317,037 47.6% 349,563 52.4% 666,600 100.0% % OF % OF SUB % OF PROVINCIAL CONSTITUENCY NAME MALES MALES FEMALES FEMALES TOTAL TOTAL CHILILABOMBWE 28,058 51.1% 26,835 48.9% 54,893 5.4% CHINGOLA 34,695 49.7% 35,098 50.3% 69,793 6.8% NCHANGA 23,622 50.0% 23,654 50.0% 47,276 4.6% KALULUSHI 32,683 50.1% 32,614 49.9% 65,297 6.4% CHIMWEMWE 29,370 48.7% 30,953 51.3% 60,323 5.9% KAMFINSA 24,282 51.1% 23,214 48.9% 47,496 4.6% KWACHA 31,637 49.3% 32,508 50.7% 64,145 6.3% NKANA 27,595 51.9% 25,562 48.1% 53,157 5.2% WUSAKILE 23,206 50.5% 22,787 49.5% 45,993 4.5% LUANSHYA 26,658 49.5% 27,225 50.5% 53,883 5.3% ROAN 15,921 50.1% 15,880 49.9% 31,801 3.1% LUFWANYAMA 18,023 50.2% 17,855 49.8% 35,878 3.5% KAFULAFUTA 10,012 46.7% 11,447 53.3% 21,459 2.1% MASAITI 14,589 48.1% 15,772 51.9% 30,361 3.0% MPONGWE 21,774 48.9% 22,720 51.1% 44,494 4.3% KANKOYO 9,579 46.7% 10,919 53.3% 20,498 2.0% KANTANSHI 15,176 49.7% 15,375 50.3% 30,551 3.0% MUFULIRA 15,822 48.8% 16,602 51.2% 32,424 3.2% BWANA MKUBWA 26,057 48.6% 27,553 51.4% 53,610 5.2% CHIFUBU 24,072 47.5% 26,567 52.5% 50,639 4.9% KABUSHI 24,513 49.1% 25,395 50.9% 49,908 4.9% NDOLA CENTRAL 30,481 49.1% 31,537 50.9% 62,018 6.0% 507,825 49.5% 518,072 50.5% 1,025,897 100.0% % OF % OF SUB % OF PROVINCIAL CONSTITUENCY NAME MALES MALES FEMALES FEMALES TOTAL TOTAL CHADIZA 19,854 44.3% 24,925 55.7% 44,779 5.0% CHIPANGALI 35,246 50.3% 34,867 49.7% 70,113 7.8% CHIPATA CENTRAL 38,478 46.6% 44,072 53.4% 82,550 9.2% KASENENGWA 22,714 43.1% 29,983 56.9% 52,697 5.9% LUANGENI 17,052 42.8% 22,831 57.2% 39,883 4.4% MILANZI 14,860 44.3% 18,675 55.7% 33,535 3.7% MKAIKA 20,475 43.5% 26,542 56.5% 47,017 5.2% CHASEFU 26,683 45.3% 32,164 54.7% 58,847 6.6% LUMEZI 23,331 43.6% 30,120 56.4% 53,451 6.0% LUNDAZI 30,045 44.9% 36,927 55.1% 66,972 7.5% MALAMBO 21,280 47.2% 23,850 52.8% 45,130 5.0% NYIMBA 23,577 44.3% 29,700 55.7% 53,277 5.9% KAUMBWE 13,059 42.8% 17,450 57.2% 30,509 3.4% MSANZALA 18747 45.2% 22753 54.8% 41,500 4.6% PETAUKE 30,542 43.6% 39,570 56.4% 70,112 7.8% KAPOCHE 18,968 42.4% 25,728 57.6% 44,696 5.0% SINDA 14,568 43.7% 18,778 56.3% 33,346 3.7% VUBWI 14,153 50.7% 13,772 49.3% 27,925 3.1% 403,632 45.0% 492,707 55.0% 896,339 100.0% % OF % OF SUB % OF PROVINCIAL CONSTITUENCY NAME MALES MALES FEMALES FEMALES TOTAL TOTAL CHEMBE 8,777 47.2% 9,817 52.8% 18,594 3.3% CHIENGE 28,416 43.8% 36,474 56.2% 64,890 11.4% CHIPILI 9,411 47.7% 10,318 52.3% 19,729 3.5% KAWAMBWA 13,110 47.0% 14,775 53.0% 27,885 4.9% PAMBASHE 10,058 48.0% 10,894 52.0% 20,952 3.7% LUAPULA 7,308 42.1% 10,045 57.9% 17,353 3.1% BAHATI 21,683 45.2% 26,236 54.8% 47,919 8.5% MANSA CENTRAL 34,228 46.6% 39,243 53.4% 73,471 13.0% MILENGE 9,773 44.0% 12,418 56.0% 22,191 3.9% MWANSABOMBWE 12,675 45.6% 15,103 54.4% 27,778 4.9% MAMBILIMA 10,513 45.6% 12,565 54.4% 23,078 4.1% MWENSE 14,192 44.4% 17,745 55.6% 31,937 5.6% NCHELENGE 32,930 45.8% 38,936 54.2% 71,866 12.7% BANGWEULU 24,270 41.9% 33,586 58.1% 57,856 10.2% CHIFUNABULI 17,226 41.5% 24,278 58.5% 41,504 7.3% 254,570 44.9% 312,433 55.1% 567,003 100.0% % OF % OF SUB % OF PROVINCIAL CONSTITUENCY NAME MALES MALES FEMALES FEMALES TOTAL TOTAL CHILANGA 36,005 49.7% 36,404 50.3% 72,409 5.8% CHIRUNDU 13,691 45.6% 16,321 54.4% 30,012 2.4% CHONGWE 45,158 47.7% 49,519 52.3% 94,677 7.6% KAFUE 37,744 47.9% 41,021 52.1% 78,765 6.3% FEIRA 6,481 45.4% 7,807 54.6% 14,288 1.1% CHAWAMA 44,176 47.6% 48,703 52.4% 92,879 7.5% KABWATA 52,401 48.2% 56,328 51.8% 108,729 8.7% KANYAMA 84,670 47.7% 92,825 52.3% 177,495 14.3% LUSAKA CENTRAL 48,413 51.9% 44,954 48.1% 93,367 7.5% MANDEVU 77,245 47.6% 85,174 52.4% 162,419 13.1% MATERO 69,192 48.8% 72,476 51.2% 141,668 11.4% MUNALI 71,923 47.5% 79,650 52.5% 151,573 12.2% RUFUNSA 11,828 46.7% 13,510 53.3% 25,338 2.0% 598,927 48.2% 644,692 51.8% 1,243,619 100.0% % OF % OF SUB % OF PROVINCIAL CONSTITUENCY NAME MALES MALES FEMALES FEMALES TOTAL TOTAL CHAMA NORTH 13,685 44.2% 17,278 55.8% 30,963 7.7% CHAMA SOUTH 9,217 41.6% 12,933 58.4% 22,150 5.5% CHINSALI 25,612 47.6% 28,170 52.4% 53,782 13.4% ISOKA 18,545 47.5% 20,505 52.5% 39,050 9.7% MAFINGA 16,692 42.4% 22,693 57.6% 39,385 9.8% KANCHIBIYA 15,990 45.9% 18,858 54.1% 34,848 8.7% MFUWE 9,571 45.8% 11,311 54.2% 20,882 5.2% MPIKA 29,541 47.5% 32,646 52.5% 62,187 15.5% NAKONDE 29,994 47.5% 33,184 52.5% 63,178 15.7% SHIWAN'GANDU 16,611 47.1% 18,622 52.9% 35,233 8.8% 185,458 46.2% 216,200 53.8% 401,658 100.0% % OF % OF SUB % OF PROVINCIAL CONSTITUENCY NAME MALES MALES FEMALES FEMALES TOTAL TOTAL CHILUBI 22,249 42.6% 29,926 57.4% 52,175 8.6% KAPUTA 18,189 46.5% 20,895 53.5% 39,084 6.4% KASAMA CENTRAL 33,902 48.9% 35,393 51.1% 69,295 11.4% LUKASHYA 29,609 46.0% 34,788 54.0% 64,397 10.6% LUBANSENSHI 18,001 46.5% 20,752 53.5% 38,753 6.4% LUPOSOSHI 13,291 44.9% 16,296 55.1% 29,587 4.9% MBALA 25,301 46.8% 28,785 53.2% 54,086 8.9% SENGA HILL 20,886 46.9% 23,657 53.1% 44,543 7.3% LUNTE 13,387 48.7% 14,075 51.3% 27,462 4.5% MPOROKOSO 11,884 47.5% 13,122 52.5% 25,006 4.1% MPULUNGU 25,086 45.8% 29,637 54.2% 54,723 9.0% MALOLE 35,601 45.3% 43,032 54.7% 78,633 13.0% CHIMBAMILONGA 13,370 46.7% 15,232 53.3% 28,602 4.7% 280,756 46.3% 325,590 53.7% 606,346 100.0% % OF % OF SUB % OF PROVINCIAL CONSTITUENCY NAME MALES MALES FEMALES FEMALES TOTAL TOTAL CHAVUMA 9,297 45.1% 11,300 54.9% 20,597 5.3% IKELENG'I 8,335 45.2% 10,106 54.8% 18,441 4.8% KABOMPO 11,414 45.6% 13,604 54.4% 25,018 6.5% KASEMPA 17,083 48.3% 18,262 51.7% 35,345 9.1% MANYINGA 11,241 45.0% 13,743 55.0% 24,984 6.5% MUFUMBWE 15,022 46.8% 17,048 53.2% 32,070 8.3% MWINILUNGA 21,896 45.4% 26,292 54.6% 48,188 12.5% SOLWEZI CENTRAL 37,454 49.0% 38,923 51.0% 76,377 19.8% SOLWEZI EAST 9,651 48.3% 10,317 51.7% 19,968 5.2% SOLWEZI WEST 22,959 48.1% 24,737 51.9% 47,696 12.3% ZAMBEZI EAST 11,624 44.2% 14,693 55.8% 26,317 6.8% ZAMBEZI WEST 5,012 42.9% 6,664 57.1% 11,676 3.0% 180,988 46.8% 205,689 53.2% 386,677 100.0% % OF % OF SUB % OF PROVINCIAL CONSTITUENCY NAME MALES MALES FEMALES FEMALES TOTAL TOTAL CHIKANKATA 17,329 47.1% 19,483 52.9% 36,812 4.7% CHOMA CENTRAL 33,813 45.9% 39,780 54.1% 73,593 9.4% MBABALA 14,354 45.5% 17,182 54.5% 31,536 4.0% GWEMBE 12,074 43.8% 15,509 56.2% 27,583 3.5% DUNDUMWEZI 15,141 45.6% 18,056 54.4% 33,197 4.2% KALOMO CENTRAL 23,890 46.1% 27,877 53.9% 51,767 6.6% KATOMBOLA 25,795 47.0% 29,131 53.0% 54,926 7.0% LIVINGSTONE 36,955 47.1% 41,515 52.9% 78,470 10.0% MAGOYE 13,995 45.4% 16,854 54.6% 30,849 3.9% MAZABUKA CENTRAL 29,053 49.3% 29,901 50.7% 58,954 7.5% BWEENGWA 11,375 45.6% 13,571 54.4% 24,946 3.2% MONZE CENTRAL 27,080 45.4% 32,581 54.6% 59,661 7.6% MOOMBA 7,720 45.7% 9,175 54.3% 16,895 2.2% NAMWALA 20,238 45.4% 24,328 54.6% 44,566 5.7% PEMBA 15,557 45.2% 18,846 54.8% 34,403 4.4% SIAVONGA 12,241 46.6% 14,024 53.4% 26,265 3.4% SINAZONGWE 27,384 44.4% 34,272 55.6% 61,656 7.9% MAPATIZYA 15,924 44.2% 20,064 55.8% 35,988 4.6% 359,918 46.0% 422,149 54.0% 782,067 100.0% % OF % OF SUB % OF PROVINCIAL CONSTITUENCY NAME MALES MALES FEMALES FEMALES TOTAL TOTAL KALABO CENTRAL 10,301 39.2% 15,954 60.8% 26,255 5.9% LIUWA 6,116 41.9% 8,479 58.1% 14,595 3.3% KAOMA CENTRAL 12,878 43.5% 16,733 56.5% 29,611 6.6% MANGANGO 7,173 42.2% 9,819 57.8% 16,992 3.8% LUENA 8,854 39.7% 13,424 60.3% 22,278 5.0% LUAMPA 8,848 40.8% 12,815 59.2% 21,663 4.8% LUKULU EAST 12,136 40.9% 17,525 59.1% 29,661 6.6% MITETE 6,045 42.8% 8,085 57.2% 14,130 3.2% MONGU CENTRAL 22,060 42.5% 29,810 57.5% 51,870 11.6% NALIKWANDA 6,423 38.7% 10,174 61.3% 16,597 3.7% MULOBEZI 6,346 43.1% 8,383 56.9% 14,729 3.3% MWANDI 6,218 44.3% 7,831 55.7% 14,049 3.1% NALOLO 9,182 39.2% 14,254 60.8% 23,436 5.2% NKEYEMA 11,739 43.7% 15,128 56.3% 26,867 6.0% SENANGA 13,326 39.5% 20,384 60.5% 33,710 7.5% SESHEKE 11,280 44.2% 14,219 55.8% 25,499 5.7% SHANGOMBO 9,329 35.1% 17,249 64.9% 26,578 5.9% SIKONGO 7,133 37.6% 11,840 62.4% 18,973 4.2% SIOMA 7,961 40.2% 11,839 59.8% 19,800 4.4% 183,348 41.0% 263,945 59.0% 447,293 100.0% .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environmental Project Brief
    Public Disclosure Authorized IMPROVED RURAL CONNECTIVITY Public Disclosure Authorized PROJECT (IRCP) REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY FEEDER ROADS IN EASTERN PROVINCE Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT BRIEF September 2020 SUBMITTED BY EASTCONSULT/DASAN CONSULT - JV Public Disclosure Authorized Improved Rural Connectivity Project Environmental Project Brief for the Rehabilitation of Primary Feeder Roads in Eastern Province Improved Rural Connectivity Project (IRCP) Rehabilitation of Primary Feeder Roads in Eastern Province EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Government of the Republic Zambia (GRZ) is seeking to increase efficiency and effectiveness of the management and maintenance of the of the Primary Feeder Roads (PFR) network. This is further motivated by the recognition that the road network constitutes the single largest asset owned by the Government, and a less than optimal system of the management and maintenance of that asset generally results in huge losses for the national economy. In order to ensure management and maintenance of the PFR, the government is introducing the OPRC concept. The OPRC is a concept is a contracting approach in which the service provider is paid not for ‘inputs’ but rather for the results of the work executed under the contract i.e. the service provider’s performance under the contract. The initial phase of the project, supported by the World Bank will be implementing the Improved Rural Connectivity Project (IRCP) in some selected districts of Central, Eastern, Northern, Luapula, Southern and Muchinga Provinces. The project will be implemented in Eastern Province for a period of five (5) years from 2020 to 2025 using the Output and Performance Road Contract (OPRC) approach. GRZ thus intends to roll out the OPRC on the PFR Network covering a total of 14,333Kms country-wide.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia Page 1 of 8
    Zambia Page 1 of 8 Zambia Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2003 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor February 25, 2004 Zambia is a republic governed by a president and a unicameral national assembly. Since 1991, multiparty elections have resulted in the victory of the Movement for Multi-Party Democracy (MMD). MMD candidate Levy Mwanawasa was elected President in 2001, and the MMD won 69 out of 150 elected seats in the National Assembly. Domestic and international observer groups noted general transparency during the voting; however, they criticized several irregularities. Opposition parties challenged the election results in court, and court proceedings were ongoing at year's end. The anti-corruption campaign launched in 2002 continued during the year and resulted in the removal of Vice President Kavindele and the arrest of former President Chiluba and many of his supporters. The Constitution mandates an independent judiciary, and the Government generally respected this provision; however, the judicial system was hampered by lack of resources, inefficiency, and reports of possible corruption. The police, divided into regular and paramilitary units under the Ministry of Home Affairs, have primary responsibility for maintaining law and order. The Zambia Security and Intelligence Service (ZSIS), under the Office of the President, is responsible for intelligence and internal security. Civilian authorities maintained effective control of the security forces. Members of the security forces committed numerous serious human rights abuses. Approximately 60 percent of the labor force worked in agriculture, although agriculture contributed only 15 percent to the gross domestic product. Economic growth increased to 4 percent for the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Winrock Report Template
    <name of> Project | Month Year Photo: EMPOWER participants from Chimtende Hub, Katete District (Winrock International) EMPOWER Case Study UNDERSTANDING VARIATION IN REAL COURSE ATTENDANCE AND ACHIEVEMENT Date: October 30, 2020 Author: Alex Hardin, Winrock International EMPOWER Case Study UNDERSTANDING VARIATION IN REAL COURSE ATTENDANCE AND ACHIEVEMENT Date: October 30, 2020 PROJECT NAME: EMPOWER: Increasing Economic and Social Empowerment for Adolescent Girls and Vulnerable Women in Zambia COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NUMBER: IL-29964-16-75-K- AUTHOR: Alex Hardin, Winrock International FUNDER: United States Department of Labor Funding is provided by the United States Department of Labor under cooperative agreement number IL-29964-16-75-K-. One hundred percent of the total costs of the project are financed with federal funds, for a total of $5,000,000. This material does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the United States Department of Labor, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government. CONTACT: 2101 Riverfront Drive 2451 Crystal Drive, Suite 700 Little Rock, AR 72202 Arlington, VA 22202 501-280-3000 701-302-6500 winrock.org Acknowledgements The case study researcher would like to thank everyone who offered their time and energy toward the development of this report. Special thanks go to the Chasefu and Petauke District Coordinators, Dennis and Sombo, without whom the vast majority of the research would have been impossible, and to Diana, Mutale, Doug,
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia Page 1 of 16
    Zambia Page 1 of 16 Zambia Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2002 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor March 31, 2003 Zambia is a republic governed by a president and a unicameral national assembly. Since 1991 generally free and fair multiparty elections have resulted in the victory of the Movement for Multi -Party Democracy (MMD). In December 2001, Levy Mwanawasa of the MMD was elected president, and his party won 69 out of 150 elected seats in the National Assembly. The MMD's use of government resources during the campaign raised questions over the fairness of the elections. Although noting general transparency during the voting, domestic and international observer groups cited irregularities in the registration process and problems in the tabulation of the election results. Opposition parties challenged the election result in court, and court proceedings remained ongoing at year's end. The Constitution mandates an independent judiciary, and the Government generally respected this provision; however, the judicial system was hampered by lack of resources, inefficiency, and reports of possible corruption. The police, divided into regular and paramilitary units operated under the Ministry of Home Affairs, had primary responsibility for maintaining law and order. The Zambia Security and Intelligence Service (ZSIS), under the Office of the President, was responsible for intelligence and internal security. Members of the security forces committed numerous, and at times serious, human rights abuses. Approximately 60 percent of the labor force worked in agriculture, although agriculture contributed only 22 percent to the gross domestic product. Economic growth slowed to 3 percent for the year, partly as a result of drought in some agricultural areas.
    [Show full text]
  • USAID/Zambia Partners in Development Book
    PARTNERS IN DEVELOPMENT July 2018 Partners in Zambia’s Development Handbook July 2018 United States Agency for International Development Embassy of the United States of America Subdivision 694 / Stand 100 Ibex Hill Road P.O. Box 320373 Lusaka, Zambia 10101 Cover Photo: As part of a private -sector and youth-engagement outreach partnership, media entrepreneur and UNAIDS Ambassador Lulu Haangala Wood (l), musician and entrepreneur Pompi (c), and Film and TV producer Yoweli Chungu (r) lend their voices to help draw attention to USAID development programs. (Photo Credit: Chando Mapoma / USAID Zambia) Our Mission On behalf of the American People, we promote and demonstrate democratic values abroad, and advance a free, peaceful, and prosperous world. In support of America's foreign policy, the U.S. Agency for International Development leads the U.S. Government's international development and disaster assistance through partnerships and investments that save lives, reduce poverty, strengthen democratic governance, and help people emerge from humanitarian crises and progress beyond assistance. Our Interagency Initiatives USAID/Zambia Partners In Development 1 The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is the lead U.S. Government agency that works to end extreme global poverty and enable resilient, democratic societies to realize their potential. Currently active in over 100 countries worldwide, USAID was born out of a spirit of progress and innovation, reflecting American values and character, motivated by a fundamental belief in helping others. USAID provides development and humanitarian assistance in Africa, Asia and the Near East, Latin America and the Caribbean, and Europe. Headquartered in Washington, D.C., USAID retains field missions around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Populism in Zambia: Michael Sata's Rise
    This is the accepted version of the article which is published by Sage in International Political Science Review, Volume: 38 issue: 4, page(s): 456-472 available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512117720809 Accepted version downloaded from SOAS Research Online: http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/24592/ Post-populism in Zambia: Michael Sata’s rise, demise and legacy Alastair Fraser SOAS University of London, UK Abstract Models explaining populism as a policy response to the interests of the urban poor struggle to understand the instability of populist mobilisations. A focus on political theatre is more helpful. This article extends the debate on populist performance, showing how populists typically do not produce rehearsed performances to passive audiences. In drawing ‘the people’ on stage they are forced to improvise. As a result, populist performances are rarely sustained. The article describes the Zambian Patriotic Front’s (PF) theatrical insurrection in 2006 and its evolution over the next decade. The PF’s populist aspect had faded by 2008 and gradually disappeared in parallel with its leader Michael Sata’s ill-health and eventual death in 2014. The party was nonetheless electorally successful. The article accounts for this evolution and describes a ‘post-populist’ legacy featuring hyper- partisanship, violence and authoritarianism. Intolerance was justified in the populist moment as a reflection of anger at inequality; it now floats free of any programme. Keywords Elections, populism, political theatre, Laclau, Zambia, Sata, Patriotic Front Introduction This article both contributes to the thin theoretic literature on ‘post-populism’ and develops an illustrative case. It discusses the explosive arrival of the Patriotic Front (PF) on the Zambian electoral scene in 2006 and the party’s subsequent evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • MINISTRY of L(Rcal Goverl{!,IEI{T AI{D HOUSING MINISTERIAL STATEIAENT by the HON MINISTER of LOCAL 2015 CONSTITUENCY DEVELOPMENT
    MINISTRY OF L(rcAL GOVERl{!,IEI{T AI{D HOUSING MINISTERIAL STATEIAENT BY THE HON MINISTER OF LOCAL GOVERNAAENT AND HOUSING ON THE RELEASE OF 2014 AND 2015 CONSTITUENCY DEVELOPMENT FUND TO CONSTITUENCIES 2 ocroBER 2015 Mr. Speaker Arising from the point of order raised by Hon. Attan Divide Mbewe, the Member of Partiament for Chadiza Constjtuency on 24th September, 2015 and the sLrbsequent ruLing which you made ordering the Mjnister of Locat Government and Housing to prepare and present a MinisteriaLStatement on the same, I now do so. Mr. Speaker Before ldo that, aLlow me to use this opportunity you have created for me, to welcome and congratuLate Hon. George Mwamba (Lubasenshi Constituency); Hon. Kasandwe (Bangweutu Constituency) and Hon. Teddy Kasonso (So(wezi West Constituency) for emerging victorious in the recently'hetd two ParLiamentary by elections. Wetcome to the world of CDF. Secondty sir, as I respond to your order to present a MjnisteriaL Statement arising from the point of order, lwoutd Like to attay the fears and misgivings the House may have that Government onty responds when jt js awakened to do so. On the contrary, Sjr, the point of order came at a time when sufficient progress was already made on the subject matter. Howeverr I am in no way belittting the point of order but rather thanking the Hon. Member of Partiament for raising jt because it aLso shows thd important rote the Constituency Devetopment Fund (CDF) ptays. SimitarLy, the point of order raised by Hon. Victoria Katima (Kasenengwa Constjtuency) yesterday in the House shows the criticat rote that CDF continues to ptay in the development efforts of the nation Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Text Document (Pdf)
    Kent Academic Repository Full text document (pdf) Citation for published version Macola, Giacomo (2006) “It Means as If We Are Excluded from the Good Freedom”: Thwarted Expectations of Independence in the Luapula Province of Zambia, 1964-1967. Journal of African History, 47 (1). pp. 43-56. ISSN 0021-8537. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021853705000848 Link to record in KAR https://kar.kent.ac.uk/7559/ Document Version UNSPECIFIED Copyright & reuse Content in the Kent Academic Repository is made available for research purposes. Unless otherwise stated all content is protected by copyright and in the absence of an open licence (eg Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher, author or other copyright holder. Versions of research The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record. Enquiries For any further enquiries regarding the licence status of this document, please contact: [email protected] If you believe this document infringes copyright then please contact the KAR admin team with the take-down information provided at http://kar.kent.ac.uk/contact.html ‘IT MEANS AS IF WE ARE EXCLUDED FROM THE GOOD FREEDOM’: THWARTED EXPECTATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE IN THE LUAPULA PROVINCE OF ZAMBIA, 1964-1966* BY GIACOMO MACOLA Centre of African Studies, University of Cambridge ABSTRACT: Based on a close reading of new archival material, this article makes a case for the adoption of an empirical, ‘sub-systemic’ approach to the study of nationalist and post- colonial politics in Zambia.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Elections and Peacebuilding in Zambia Assessment Final Report
    Elections and Peacebuilding in Zambia Assessment Final Report Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 3 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 8 I. Structural Vulnerabilities ................................................................................................. 9 A. Political Factors.............................................................................................................. 9 B. Social Factors ............................................................................................................... 11 Table 1 .............................................................................................................................. 14 Composition of Members of Parliament by Gender since 1994 ....................................... 14 C. Economic Factors ......................................................................................................... 14 D. Security Factors............................................................................................................ 14 II. Vulnerabilities Specific to the 2011 Election ............................................................... 15 A. Electoral Administration .............................................................................................. 15 B. Parallel Vote Tabulation (PVT) ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Country Profile: Zambia
    TECHNICAL MARKET REVIEW Country Profile: Zambia CTCN Report No.: REPORT NO, Rev. Draft Date: 2018-06-06 1 IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER 1. This document is intended for the sole use of the Customer as detailed on the front page of this document to whom the document is addressed and who has entered into a written agreement with the DNV GL entity issuing this document (“DNV GL”). To the extent permitted by law, neither DNV GL nor any group company (the "Group") assumes any responsibility whether in contract, tort including without limitation negligence, or otherwise howsoever, to third parties (being persons other than the Customer), and no company in the Group other than DNV GL shall be liable for any loss or damage whatsoever suffered by virtue of any act, omission or default (whether arising by negligence or otherwise) by DNV GL, the Group or any of its or their servants, subcontractors or agents. This document must be read in its entirety and is subject to any assumptions and qualifications expressed therein as well as in any other relevant communications in connection with it. This document may contain detailed technical data which is intended for use only by persons possessing requisite expertise in its subject matter. 2. This document is protected by copyright and may only be reproduced and circulated in accordance with the Document Classification and associated conditions stipulated or referred to in this document and/or in DNV GL’s written agreement with the Customer. No part of this document may be disclosed in any public offering memorandum, prospectus or stock exchange listing, circular or announcement without the express and prior written consent of DNV GL.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Affairs and Business Development
    CORPORATE AFFAIRS AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT THE PROPOSED CONNECTION OF NORTH WESTERN PROVINCE TO THE NATIONAL GRID AT 132kV PREPARED BY THE ENVIRONMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS UNIT 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the Northwestern Province (NWP) ZESCO Limited supplies electricity to five districts namely Mwinilunga, Mufumbwe, Kabompo, Zambezi and Chavuma from isolated Diesel Generation Stations located in each district. The older districts (Mwinilunga, Kabompo, and Zambezi) have been on diesel power supply for over forty years now. Solwezi and Kasempa are the only two districts in the province that are supplied from the national hydro power grid. Power supply from the diesel power stations is characterized by high operational costs, inadequate capacity, very low reliability and high emissions. ZESCO Limited has therefore long sought to replace diesel generated power supply with reliable and cost effective power from the national grid by connecting all the diesel power stations to the grid. By the year 2000, ZESCO Limited was operating ten diesel stations country wide, but by 2007, four such stations had been replaced by grid supply while two new stations were installed in two newly designated districts. Despite having great potential for mining and agricultural development, NWP generally remains underdeveloped due to insufficient and unreliable power supply. It is against this background that the Government of the Republic of Zambia through ZESCO Limited, intends to connect the 5 NWP Districts still on diesel, to the National Grid at 132 kilo Volts (kV) through a transmission line network from Kasempa T-Off (Nselauke) to Chavuma and linking Mwinilunga to Lumwana. The main objective of the project is to replace the diesel generated electricity with hydro electricity by constructing a 132kV transmission line network which would be linked to the main national power grid.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMITTEE on HEALTH, JUNE 2019.Pdf
    REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL SERVICES FOR THE THIRD SESSION OF THE TWELFTH NATIONAL ASSEMBLY Printed by the National Assembly of Zambia REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON HEALTH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL SERVICES FOR THE THIRD SESSION OF THE TWELFTH NATIONAL ASSEMBLY TABLE OF CONTENTS Item Page 1.0. Membership of the Committee 3 2.0. Functions of the Committee 3 3.0. Meetings of the Committee 4 4.0. Committee’s Programme of Work 4 5.0. Arrangement of the Report 4 6.0. Procedure adopted by the Committee 4 PART I CONSIDERATION OF THE TOPICAL ISSUES Topic One - Service Delivery in Public Health Institutions in Zambia 7.0. Background 5 7.1. Consolidated summary of submissions by Stakeholders 6 7.1.1. Defining Service Delivery 6 7.1.2. The Provision of Health Care Services in Zambia 6 7.1.3. The Delivery of Health Care Services in Zambia 7 7.1.4. Financing of the Public Health Services 7 7.1.5. Adequacy of the Policy and Legal Framework Governing Service Delivery in Zambia 7 7.1.6. Strategies that Government has put in place to improve Health Service Delivery 8 7.1.7. The Role of Non-state Actors in Complimenting the Government’s Efforts in Providing Quality Service Delivery in Health Institutions 11 7.1.8. Challenges Facing Public Health Institutions in Providing Quality Service Delivery 11 8.0. Other Concerns Raised by Stakeholders 15 9.0. Local Tour of Lusaka and Luapula Provinces 19 9.1.
    [Show full text]