DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Elections and Peacebuilding in Zambia Assessment Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Elections and Peacebuilding in Zambia Assessment Final Report Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 3 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 8 I. Structural Vulnerabilities ................................................................................................. 9 A. Political Factors.............................................................................................................. 9 B. Social Factors ............................................................................................................... 11 Table 1 .............................................................................................................................. 14 Composition of Members of Parliament by Gender since 1994 ....................................... 14 C. Economic Factors ......................................................................................................... 14 D. Security Factors............................................................................................................ 14 II. Vulnerabilities Specific to the 2011 Election ............................................................... 15 A. Electoral Administration .............................................................................................. 15 B. Parallel Vote Tabulation (PVT) ................................................................................... 16 C. Political Campaign Practices ........................................................................................ 16 C. Vote Buying ................................................................................................................. 17 D. Closeness of Contests and Expectations ...................................................................... 18 E. Constitutional Reforms ................................................................................................. 18 F. Electoral Dispute Resolution ........................................................................................ 18 G. Media Environment...................................................................................................... 19 H. Social Media ................................................................................................................ 19 I. Summary of Vulnerabilities.......................................................................................... 20 Table 2 .............................................................................................................................. 20 Summary of Vulnerabilities and Implications for Conflict .............................................. 20 III. Mitigating Capacities .................................................................................................. 21 A. Electoral Commission of Zambia. ............................................................................... 21 B. Voter Registration ........................................................................................................ 21 C. Conflict Management Committees............................................................................... 22 D. Voter Education ........................................................................................................... 22 E. Zambian Military .......................................................................................................... 22 IV. Profile of Electoral Threats ......................................................................................... 23 A. Electoral Threat Profile Summary ............................................................................... 23 Electoral Peacebuilding in Zambia – Assessment Final Report 1 Creative Associates International July 2011 B. Stakeholder Analysis .................................................................................................... 23 C. Electoral Environment Factors ..................................................................................... 34 Table 3 .............................................................................................................................. 35 Closeness of Electoral Contest – 2008 Presidential By-Election ..................................... 35 D. Electoral Threat Profile Summary ............................................................................... 36 V. Current Initiatives in Electoral Peacebuilding ............................................................. 38 A. State-Based Initiatives.................................................................................................. 38 B. Non-State-Based Initiatives.......................................................................................... 39 VI. Electoral Peacebuilding Framework ........................................................................... 41 A. Recommendations Specific to the 2011 Electoral Contest ......................................... 41 1. State-Based Initiatives .................................................................................................. 41 Table 4 .............................................................................................................................. 44 Electoral Violence Education and Resolution (EVER) Dataset ....................................... 44 2. Non-State Based Initiatives........................................................................................... 45 Table 5 .............................................................................................................................. 47 Electoral Peacebuilding Framework Activity Summary Matrix ..................................... 47 B. Structural Reforms ....................................................................................................... 48 VII. Conclusions ............................................................................................................... 49 Annex One – Team Biographies and Organizational Profiles .......................................... 50 Annex Two - Institutions and Organizations Interviewed ................................................ 53 Annex Three – Acronyms ................................................................................................. 55 Annex Four – Media Organizations .................................................................................. 56 Annex Five – Mapping ..................................................................................................... 57 Electoral Peacebuilding in Zambia – Assessment Final Report 2 Creative Associates International July 2011 Executive Summary From July 8 through 14, 2011, Creative Associates International (Creative) and Pax Mondial, Limited (Pax) conducted a study in Zambia to assess the current political environment and its impact on peaceful elections. The objective of this study was to establish a profile on potential threats to electoral peace and to make recommendations on promoting a secure environment for the 2011 Zambian national and sub-national elections. The study was conducted by a four-person team, each of whom focused on one of the following areas: 1) governmental; 2) civil society; 3) political; and 4) security.1 The methodology employed by the team involved desk research and field interviews with Zambian and international stakeholders involved with administering, securing, observing, adjudicating, or providing education surrounding the 2011 elections. This methodology reflected the approach found in the Electoral Security Framework, developed by Creative for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).2 The report is organized into six content sections. This Executive Summary reviews the findings from each of these sections in order. The first section identifies underlying structural vulnerabilities for electoral conflict that may place a peaceful election at risk. The main structural vulnerabilities that pose risks to holding a peaceful 2011 election include Zambia‘s status as a transitioning democracy, political finance, as well as the presidential form of governance and associated electoral system that contribute to a ―winner-take-all‖ scenario and accompanying heightened political stakes. The lack of any political finance legal framework and enforcement mechanism embedded in the country‘s constitution has contributed to an environment in which rumors circulate surrounding the sources of funding and the ruling Movement for Multi-Party Democracy (MMD) party uses its control over key government agencies and ties with banks to place pressure on opposition parties and reduce funding to them. Equally important are the intersecting issues of high levels of poverty and unemployment and the ‗youth bulge‘ that characterize Zambia‘s demography. Poverty renders individuals more susceptible to vote buying as well as offers of cash from (mainly) political parties in exchange for perpetrating violent acts to achieve among other objectives intimidate voters. On this latter point, youth remain particularly vulnerable and have in the past in the form of youth party cadres (mainly by the MMD and Patriotic Front (PF) party) been deployed to harass and intimidate opposition voters. Although of lesser importance, the issue of Tribalism in general and in particular the corruption of tribal chiefs is an underlying area of vulnerability,
Recommended publications
  • The Office of the Inspector General

    The Office of the Inspector General

    The Office of the Inspector General Country Audit of Global Fund Grants to Zambia Audit Report No: GF-OIG-09-15 Issue Date: 5 October 2010 Country Audit of Global Fund Grants to Zambia Table of contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................... 1 Summary of findings .................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 11 Ministry of Health ........................................................................................ 13 Background ............................................................................................... 13 Achievements and challenges ................................................................... 15 Strengthening grant management ............................................................. 16 Ministry of Finance and National Planning (MOFNP) ............................... 47 Background ............................................................................................... 47 Achievements and challenges ................................................................... 47 Strengthening Grant Management............................................................. 48 Zambia National AIDS Network .................................................................. 59 Background ............................................................................................... 59 Achievements and
  • CSEC Report on Zambia's 2011 Tripartite Elections

    CSEC Report on Zambia's 2011 Tripartite Elections

    CIVIL SOCIETY ELECTION COALITION (CSEC) 2011 CSEC Report on Zambia’s 2011 Tripartite Elections 20 September 2011 December 2011 CSEC Secretariat, c/o Caritas Zambia Plot 60 Kabulonga Road P. O. Box 31965, Lusaka Zambia ‘CSEC: Promoting transparent and credible elections through monitoring all stages of the 2011 electoral process in Zambia’ 1 FOREWORD Civil society in Zambia has a long history of contributinG to the democratic process throuGh a number of activities carried out by individual orGanisations. As the civil society in the country Geared up to be part of Zambia’s 2011 tripartite elections, the idea and viability of coming up with a coordinated and structured coalition such as CSEC 2011 was unforeseen until about May 2011. Eight (8) civil society orGanizations came toGether, believing in their unique capacities but also acknowledging the Great enerGy that would be realised if the orGanisations worked toGether. CSEC thus provided a unique experience of election monitoring. The CSEC experience has Gave the participatinG civil society orGanisations an opportunity to learn many lessons from the challenges and successes of working for a common purpose in a coalition. While the challenges that CSEC faced (limited time, limited resources and varying orGanisational cultures) made it a not so easy task, such challenges were not insurmountable. It was remarkable thouGh to note that partner orGanizations remained committed to the cause and hence the achievements that were realised by the coalition. For instance the contribution made to Zambia’s 2011 elections by CSEC’s Rapid Response Project (RRP) was just phenomenal. Amidst harassment, threats and denunciations arisinG from an ill informed debate on Parallel Vote Tabulation (PVT), CSEC was able to verify official election results using RRP as alternative concept to PVT.
  • Zambia General Elections

    Zambia General Elections

    Report of the Commonwealth Observer Group ZAMBIA GENERAL ELECTIONS 20 September 2011 COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT Table of Contents Chapter 1 ................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1 Terms of Reference ....................................................................................... 1 Activities ....................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2 ................................................................................................... 3 POLITICAL BACKGROUND ....................................................................... 3 Early History ................................................................................................. 3 Colonial History of Zambia ............................................................................. 3 Post-Independence Politics ............................................................................ 3 2001 General Elections .................................................................................. 4 2006 General Elections .................................................................................. 5 The 2008 Presidential By-Election ................................................................... 5 Other Developments ...................................................................................... 5 Constitutional Review ...................................................................................
  • The Iccf Group Brochure Ed

    The Iccf Group Brochure Ed

    THE ICCF GROUP BROCHURE ED. 2021-2022 INTERNATIONALCONSERVATION.ORG TABLE OF CONTENTS WHO WE ARE AND WHAT WE DO ................................................................ 4 WORKING WITH LEGISLATURES ..................................................................... 8 • Caucuses We Support ................................. 10 • ICCF in the United States ................................ 12 • The ICCF Group in the United Kingdom ......................................................................................................... 31 • The ICCF Group in Latin America & the Caribbean ...................................................................................... 39 • The ICCF Group in Africa ............................ 63 • The ICCF Group in Southeast Asia ................ 93 WORKING WITH MINISTRIES ....................................................................... 103 MISSION THE MOST ADVANCED WE WORK HOW TO ADVANCE SOLUTION IN CONSERVATION CONSERVATION GOVERNANCE GOVERNANCE BY BUILDING 1. WE BUILD POLITICAL WILL POLITICAL WILL, The ICCF Group advances leadership in conservation by building political will among parliamentary PROVIDING and congressional leaders, and by supporting ministries in the management of protected areas. ON-THE-GROUND SOLUTIONS 2. CATALYZING CHANGE WITH KNOWLEDGE & EXPERTISE We support political will to conserve natural resources by catalyzing strategic partnerships and knowledge sharing between policymakers and our extensive network. VISION 3. TO PRESERVE THE WORLD'S MOST CRITICAL LANDSCAPES
  • Fifty Years of the Kasempa District, Zambia 1964 – 2014 Change and Continuity

    Fifty Years of the Kasempa District, Zambia 1964 – 2014 Change and Continuity

    FIFTY YEARS OF THE KASEMPA DISTRICT, ZAMBIA 1964 – 2014 CHANGE AND CONTINUITY. A case study of the ups and downs within a remote rural Zambian region during the fifty years since Independence. A descriptive analysis of its demography, geography, infrastructure, agricultural practice and present and traditional cultural aspects, including an account on the traditional ceremony of the installation of regional Headmen and the role and functions of the Kaonde clan structure. Dick Jaeger, 2015 [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF MAPS AND FIGURES...........................................................................................................3 PART I 4 PREFACE – A WORD OF THANKS.....................................................................................................4 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY......................................................................................................6 CHAPTER 1. DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGES.......................................................................................10 ZAMBIA.............................................................................................................................10 KASEMPA DISTRICT........................................................................................................10 CHAPTER 2. AGRICULTURE............................................................................................................12 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................12
  • DRAFT REPORT 2018 DA .Pdf

    DRAFT REPORT 2018 DA .Pdf

    NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF ZAMBIA REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT ASSURANCES FOR THE SECOND SESSION OF THE TWELFTH NATIONAL ASSEMBLY APPOINTED ON THURSDAY, 21ST SEPTEMBER, 2017 Printed by the National Assembly of Zambia i Table of Content 1.1 Functions of the Committee ........................................................................................... 1 1.2 Procedure adopted by the Committee .......................................................................... 1 1.3 Meetings of the Committee ............................................................................................ 2 PART I - CONSIDERATION OF SUBMISSIONS ON NEW ASSURANCES ............... 2 MINISTRY OF HIGHER EDUCATION ................................................................................ 2 11/17 Construction of FTJ Chiluba University .................................................................... 2 MINISTRY OF GENERAL EDUCATION ............................................................................. 3 39/17 Mateyo Kakumbi Primary School in Chitambo/Local Tour .................................. 3 21 /17 Mufumbwe Day Secondary School Laboratory ...................................................... 5 26/17 Pondo Basic School ....................................................................................................... 5 28/17 Deployment of Teachers to Nangoma Constituency ............................................... 6 19/16 Class Room Block at Lumimba Day Secondary School........................................... 6 17/17 Electrification
  • Imminent Arrest Tomorrow

    Imminent Arrest Tomorrow

    No317 K10 www.diggers.news Wednesday November 28, 2018 POLICE GO FOR KAMBWILI ...imminent arrest tomorrowStory page 4 PF’s loss in Don’t be used in economic Lusinde a confl ict against Chinese, tip of an Lubinda tells Zambians By Zondiwe Mbewe of the campaign against Justice Minister Given the death penalty by an iceberg – Lubinda says Zambia organisation called St should resist the Egidio. temptation of being used “It is unfortunate that Ngoma in an economic con ict some Zambians were By Abraham Kalito against the Chinese. taking the law in their Former Sinda member of And Lubinda has revealed own hands by attacking parliament Levy Ngoma has that Zambia has voted foreigners who had come warned that the Patriotic in the a rmative at the in the country to invest,” Front’s loss of the Lusinde United Nations –UN- Lubinda said. To page 11 Ward by-election is a tip on maintenance of a of the ice berg because suspension of the death residents are angry with penalty. the regime’s poor service According to a statement Tame your delivery. issued by Zambia’s First And Ngoma says President Secretary for Press and Edgar Lungu is promoting Tourism in Ethiopia hotheads, tribalism by expecting Inutu Mupango Mwanza, Easterners to vote for him Tuesday, Lubinda was on a ‘wako ni wako’ basis VJ urges simply because he comes speaking in Addis Ababa, from that part of the Ethiopia on Monday when country. he transited to Rome to Lungu, HH To page 10 attend a conference on Story page 2 the 10th Anniversary Let’s all agree, PF must go in 2021 – Andyford SIMPLICITY: Prince Harry bids farewell to British High Commissioner to Zambia Story page 2 Fergus Cochrane-Dyet at BongoHive’s Lusaka o ces yesterday - Picture Stuart Lisulo 2.
  • Environmental Project Brief

    Environmental Project Brief

    Public Disclosure Authorized IMPROVED RURAL CONNECTIVITY Public Disclosure Authorized PROJECT (IRCP) REHABILITATION OF PRIMARY FEEDER ROADS IN EASTERN PROVINCE Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECT BRIEF September 2020 SUBMITTED BY EASTCONSULT/DASAN CONSULT - JV Public Disclosure Authorized Improved Rural Connectivity Project Environmental Project Brief for the Rehabilitation of Primary Feeder Roads in Eastern Province Improved Rural Connectivity Project (IRCP) Rehabilitation of Primary Feeder Roads in Eastern Province EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Government of the Republic Zambia (GRZ) is seeking to increase efficiency and effectiveness of the management and maintenance of the of the Primary Feeder Roads (PFR) network. This is further motivated by the recognition that the road network constitutes the single largest asset owned by the Government, and a less than optimal system of the management and maintenance of that asset generally results in huge losses for the national economy. In order to ensure management and maintenance of the PFR, the government is introducing the OPRC concept. The OPRC is a concept is a contracting approach in which the service provider is paid not for ‘inputs’ but rather for the results of the work executed under the contract i.e. the service provider’s performance under the contract. The initial phase of the project, supported by the World Bank will be implementing the Improved Rural Connectivity Project (IRCP) in some selected districts of Central, Eastern, Northern, Luapula, Southern and Muchinga Provinces. The project will be implemented in Eastern Province for a period of five (5) years from 2020 to 2025 using the Output and Performance Road Contract (OPRC) approach. GRZ thus intends to roll out the OPRC on the PFR Network covering a total of 14,333Kms country-wide.
  • Zambia Page 1 of 8

    Zambia Page 1 of 8

    Zambia Page 1 of 8 Zambia Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2003 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor February 25, 2004 Zambia is a republic governed by a president and a unicameral national assembly. Since 1991, multiparty elections have resulted in the victory of the Movement for Multi-Party Democracy (MMD). MMD candidate Levy Mwanawasa was elected President in 2001, and the MMD won 69 out of 150 elected seats in the National Assembly. Domestic and international observer groups noted general transparency during the voting; however, they criticized several irregularities. Opposition parties challenged the election results in court, and court proceedings were ongoing at year's end. The anti-corruption campaign launched in 2002 continued during the year and resulted in the removal of Vice President Kavindele and the arrest of former President Chiluba and many of his supporters. The Constitution mandates an independent judiciary, and the Government generally respected this provision; however, the judicial system was hampered by lack of resources, inefficiency, and reports of possible corruption. The police, divided into regular and paramilitary units under the Ministry of Home Affairs, have primary responsibility for maintaining law and order. The Zambia Security and Intelligence Service (ZSIS), under the Office of the President, is responsible for intelligence and internal security. Civilian authorities maintained effective control of the security forces. Members of the security forces committed numerous serious human rights abuses. Approximately 60 percent of the labor force worked in agriculture, although agriculture contributed only 15 percent to the gross domestic product. Economic growth increased to 4 percent for the year.
  • Winrock Report Template

    Winrock Report Template

    <name of> Project | Month Year Photo: EMPOWER participants from Chimtende Hub, Katete District (Winrock International) EMPOWER Case Study UNDERSTANDING VARIATION IN REAL COURSE ATTENDANCE AND ACHIEVEMENT Date: October 30, 2020 Author: Alex Hardin, Winrock International EMPOWER Case Study UNDERSTANDING VARIATION IN REAL COURSE ATTENDANCE AND ACHIEVEMENT Date: October 30, 2020 PROJECT NAME: EMPOWER: Increasing Economic and Social Empowerment for Adolescent Girls and Vulnerable Women in Zambia COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NUMBER: IL-29964-16-75-K- AUTHOR: Alex Hardin, Winrock International FUNDER: United States Department of Labor Funding is provided by the United States Department of Labor under cooperative agreement number IL-29964-16-75-K-. One hundred percent of the total costs of the project are financed with federal funds, for a total of $5,000,000. This material does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the United States Department of Labor, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the United States Government. CONTACT: 2101 Riverfront Drive 2451 Crystal Drive, Suite 700 Little Rock, AR 72202 Arlington, VA 22202 501-280-3000 701-302-6500 winrock.org Acknowledgements The case study researcher would like to thank everyone who offered their time and energy toward the development of this report. Special thanks go to the Chasefu and Petauke District Coordinators, Dennis and Sombo, without whom the vast majority of the research would have been impossible, and to Diana, Mutale, Doug,
  • Political Economy Diagnostic Exercise- Zambia

    Political Economy Diagnostic Exercise- Zambia

    POLITICAL ECONOMY DIAGNOSTIC EXERCISE- ZAMBIA Final Report th 5 August 2011 Rachel Flanary, Denis Wood, Craig Mathieson and Diana Cammack Church & Court Barn, Church Lane Tickenham, Bristol, BS21 6SD United Kingdom Tel: +44 1275 811 345 [email protected] www.theIDLgroup.com POLITICAL ECONOMY DIAGNOSTIC EXERCISE- ZAMBIA Final Report 5th August 2011 The IDL Group Ltd Church and Court Barn Church Lane Tickenham Bristol BS21 6SD United Kingdom Tel: +44 1275 811345 Fax: +44 1275 811333 Email: [email protected] Web: www.theIDLgroup.com Prepared by: Rachel Flanary Reviewed by: Rachel Percy Approved by: © theIDLgroup 2011 Political Economy Diagnostic Exercise- Zambia Acknowledgements The study team would like to thank USAID/Zambia and in particular Adam Jung for the support received and the assistance provided in setting up meetings and sending relevant document. Much of this work was carried out during a particularly busy period for USAID staff, as people were preparing for the new country strategy. We appreciate the extra effort that has been taken in meeting us for discussions, answering our many questions and sending through relevant documentation. We interviewed stakeholders in Lusaka and in Eastern Province. We would like to thank the people who were generous with their time, who helped us in the field, and who organised meetings for us. Thanks to you all. Political Economy Diagnostic Exercise- Zambia Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………………………………… (i) 1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................
  • Intra-Party Democracy in the Zambian Polity1

    Intra-Party Democracy in the Zambian Polity1

    John Bwalya, Owen B. Sichone: REFRACTORY FRONTIER: INTRA-PARTY … REFRACTORY FRONTIER: INTRA-PARTY DEMOCRACY IN THE ZAMBIAN POLITY1 John Bwalya Owen B. Sichone Abstract: Despite the important role that intra-party democracy plays in democratic consolidation, particularly in third-wave democracies, it has not received as much attention as inter-party democracy. Based on the Zambian polity, this article uses the concept of selectocracy to explain why, to a large extent, intra-party democracy has remained a refractory frontier. Two traits of intra-party democracy are examined: leadership transitions at party president-level and the selection of political party members for key leadership positions. The present study of four political parties: United National Independence Party (UNIP), Movement for Multiparty Democracy (MMD), United Party for National Development (UPND) and Patriotic Front (PF) demonstrates that the iron law of oligarchy predominates leadership transitions and selection. Within this milieu, intertwined but fluid factors, inimical to democratic consolidation but underpinning selectocracy, are explained. Keywords: Intra-party Democracy, Leadership Transition, Ethnicity, Selectocracy, Third Wave Democracies Introduction Although there is a general consensus that political parties are essential to liberal democracy (Teorell 1999; Matlosa 2007; Randall 2007; Omotola 2010; Ennser-Jedenastik and Müller 2015), they often failed to live up to the expected democratic values such as sustaining intra-party democracy (Rakner and Svasånd 2013). As a result, some scholars have noted that parties may therefore not necessarily be good for democratic consolidation because they promote private economic interests, which are inimical to democracy and state building (Aaron 1 The authors gratefully acknowledge the comments from the editorial staff and anonymous reviewers.