DOCSLIB.ORG

CSEC Report on Zambia's 2011 Tripartite Elections

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CSEC Report on Zambia's 2011 Tripartite Elections CIVIL SOCIETY ELECTION COALITION (CSEC) 2011 CSEC Report on Zambia’s 2011 Tripartite Elections 20 September 2011 December 2011 CSEC Secretariat, c/o Caritas Zambia Plot 60 Kabulonga Road P. O. Box 31965, Lusaka Zambia ‘CSEC: Promoting transparent and credible elections through monitoring all stages of the 2011 electoral process in Zambia’ 1 FOREWORD Civil society in Zambia has a long history of contributinG to the democratic process throuGh a number of activities carried out by individual orGanisations. As the civil society in the country Geared up to be part of Zambia’s 2011 tripartite elections, the idea and viability of coming up with a coordinated and structured coalition such as CSEC 2011 was unforeseen until about May 2011. Eight (8) civil society orGanizations came toGether, believing in their unique capacities but also acknowledging the Great enerGy that would be realised if the orGanisations worked toGether. CSEC thus provided a unique experience of election monitoring. The CSEC experience has Gave the participatinG civil society orGanisations an opportunity to learn many lessons from the challenges and successes of working for a common purpose in a coalition. While the challenges that CSEC faced (limited time, limited resources and varying orGanisational cultures) made it a not so easy task, such challenges were not insurmountable. It was remarkable thouGh to note that partner orGanizations remained committed to the cause and hence the achievements that were realised by the coalition. For instance the contribution made to Zambia’s 2011 elections by CSEC’s Rapid Response Project (RRP) was just phenomenal. Amidst harassment, threats and denunciations arisinG from an ill informed debate on Parallel Vote Tabulation (PVT), CSEC was able to verify official election results using RRP as alternative concept to PVT. The 2011 tripartite elections were not only important for Zambia but for the entire Southern African region. The elections have become a Good practice for peaceful elections, wide stakeholder participation and peaceful transfer of power. CSEC did a comparative analysis of the RRP and ECZ final election results and the outcome showed consistency between the two. It is our belief that our involvement as civil society Gave confidence and inteGrity to the process. Now that elections are behind us, we should continue to use our strengths and press for the improvements in our electoral process especially as we anticipate the pending constitutional reforms. The lack of movement in constitutional reforms has consequently impeded proGress in electoral reforms and as a country we should seize the opportunity of constitutional reforms to strengthen the leGal framework for our elections. This CSEC 2011 Election MonitorinG Report provides a detailed account of the critical findings that CSEC noted during its monitorinG effort. Salient, among these were that:- · during the pre-Election Day period the Electoral Commission of Zambia endeavoured to provide a conducive environment by being inclusive and consultative to all stakeholders; · media coveraGe of competing political parties and candidates failed to adhere to the Electoral (Code of Conduct) ReGulations; · freedom of an individual to run for public office throuGh adoptions in most political parties was constrained by lack intra party democracy in almost all our political parties. All political parties failed to deliberately demonstrate a commitment to the promotion of women, youth and people living with disability participation; · durinG Election Day, it was observed that most polling stations commenced votinG in official time; secrecy of the vote was larGely enhanced, and availability of election materials was significantly suitable for the conduct of an election. CSEC-2011 notes that the Electoral Commission of Zambia’s is yet to realise its independence, Given the numerous incidents that occurred which could act to undermine election inteGrity. We recommend that the Current Constitutional Reforms embraces this critical inadequacy by reviewing the existing centralised executive functioninG of the Commission. The possibility of decentralising the commission and Giving it resource autonomy must be explored. CSEC – ‘ZAMBIA’S 2011 TRIPARTITE ELECTIONS REPORT’ 2 It is our hope that stakeholders will find this report educative and informative. We call upon all concerned stakeholders to take note of the critical observations made and act upon them. I wish, on behalf of the CSEC steering committee, to extend our sincere Gratitude to all the monitors, supervisory staff, CSEC personnel and all people of Goodwill for a job well done. We are also Grateful to the donor community and National Democratic Institute (NDI) for partnerinG with CSEC. We also wish to thank the Electoral Commission of Zambia, the media, the Zambia Police, Anti-Corruption Commission and other stakeholders who in many ways contributed in makinG our work as CSEC much liGhter. Sam Mulafulafu CSEC CHAIRPERSON December 2011 CSEC – ‘ZAMBIA’S 2011 TRIPARTITE ELECTIONS REPORT’ 3 FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES ..................................................................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................................. 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................................................... 9 ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................................................... 10 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 OVERVIEW ON DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS......................................................................................................... 12 1.2 THE 2011 ELECTIONS REPORT ............................................................................................................................. 12 2 COUNTRY CONTEXT .................................................................................................................................................... 14 2.1 A SOCIO-ECONOMIC BRIEF .................................................................................................................................... 14 2.2 POLITICS AND ELECTIONS IN ZAMBIA................................................................................................................... 14 2.2.1 The Period 1991 to 2000 ................................................................................................................................... 14 2.2.2 The Period 2001 to 2011 ................................................................................................................................... 19 2.4 RETROSPECT .......................................................................................................................................................... 23 3 LEGAL FRAMEWORKS FOR ELECTIONS IN ZAMBIA ................................................................................................. 24 3.1 OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................................................................. 24 3.2 LEGAL FRAMEWORKS ............................................................................................................................................ 24 3.2.1 Constitution of Zambia Act ............................................................................................................................... 24 3.2.2 Electoral Act No. 12 of 2006.............................................................................................................................. 25 3.2.3 The Electoral Commission Act ........................................................................................................................... 26 3.2.4 The Electoral (Code of Conduct) Regulations, 2011 .......................................................................................... 26 3.2.5 Local Government Act and Local Government Elections Act 1994..................................................................... 28 3.2.6 Public Order Act, No. 1 of 1996 ......................................................................................................................... 28 3.2.7 Anti-Corruption Act .......................................................................................................................................... 28 3.3 ZAMBIA’S ELECTORAL SYSTEM ............................................................................................................................ 28 3.4 CONSTITUTIONAL AND ELECTORAL REFORMS ....................................................................................................... 28 3.4.1 Constitutional Reforms ..................................................................................................................................... 28 3.4.2 Electoral Reforms ............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Office of the Inspector General
    The Office of the Inspector General Country Audit of Global Fund Grants to Zambia Audit Report No: GF-OIG-09-15 Issue Date: 5 October 2010 Country Audit of Global Fund Grants to Zambia Table of contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................... 1 Summary of findings .................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 11 Ministry of Health ........................................................................................ 13 Background ............................................................................................... 13 Achievements and challenges ................................................................... 15 Strengthening grant management ............................................................. 16 Ministry of Finance and National Planning (MOFNP) ............................... 47 Background ............................................................................................... 47 Achievements and challenges ................................................................... 47 Strengthening Grant Management............................................................. 48 Zambia National AIDS Network .................................................................. 59 Background ............................................................................................... 59 Achievements and
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia General Elections
    Report of the Commonwealth Observer Group ZAMBIA GENERAL ELECTIONS 20 September 2011 COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT Table of Contents Chapter 1 ................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1 Terms of Reference ....................................................................................... 1 Activities ....................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2 ................................................................................................... 3 POLITICAL BACKGROUND ....................................................................... 3 Early History ................................................................................................. 3 Colonial History of Zambia ............................................................................. 3 Post-Independence Politics ............................................................................ 3 2001 General Elections .................................................................................. 4 2006 General Elections .................................................................................. 5 The 2008 Presidential By-Election ................................................................... 5 Other Developments ...................................................................................... 5 Constitutional Review ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Imminent Arrest Tomorrow
    No317 K10 www.diggers.news Wednesday November 28, 2018 POLICE GO FOR KAMBWILI ...imminent arrest tomorrowStory page 4 PF’s loss in Don’t be used in economic Lusinde a confl ict against Chinese, tip of an Lubinda tells Zambians By Zondiwe Mbewe of the campaign against Justice Minister Given the death penalty by an iceberg – Lubinda says Zambia organisation called St should resist the Egidio. temptation of being used “It is unfortunate that Ngoma in an economic con ict some Zambians were By Abraham Kalito against the Chinese. taking the law in their Former Sinda member of And Lubinda has revealed own hands by attacking parliament Levy Ngoma has that Zambia has voted foreigners who had come warned that the Patriotic in the a rmative at the in the country to invest,” Front’s loss of the Lusinde United Nations –UN- Lubinda said. To page 11 Ward by-election is a tip on maintenance of a of the ice berg because suspension of the death residents are angry with penalty. the regime’s poor service According to a statement Tame your delivery. issued by Zambia’s First And Ngoma says President Secretary for Press and Edgar Lungu is promoting Tourism in Ethiopia hotheads, tribalism by expecting Inutu Mupango Mwanza, Easterners to vote for him Tuesday, Lubinda was on a ‘wako ni wako’ basis VJ urges simply because he comes speaking in Addis Ababa, from that part of the Ethiopia on Monday when country. he transited to Rome to Lungu, HH To page 10 attend a conference on Story page 2 the 10th Anniversary Let’s all agree, PF must go in 2021 – Andyford SIMPLICITY: Prince Harry bids farewell to British High Commissioner to Zambia Story page 2 Fergus Cochrane-Dyet at BongoHive’s Lusaka o ces yesterday - Picture Stuart Lisulo 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia Page 1 of 8
    Zambia Page 1 of 8 Zambia Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2003 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor February 25, 2004 Zambia is a republic governed by a president and a unicameral national assembly. Since 1991, multiparty elections have resulted in the victory of the Movement for Multi-Party Democracy (MMD). MMD candidate Levy Mwanawasa was elected President in 2001, and the MMD won 69 out of 150 elected seats in the National Assembly. Domestic and international observer groups noted general transparency during the voting; however, they criticized several irregularities. Opposition parties challenged the election results in court, and court proceedings were ongoing at year's end. The anti-corruption campaign launched in 2002 continued during the year and resulted in the removal of Vice President Kavindele and the arrest of former President Chiluba and many of his supporters. The Constitution mandates an independent judiciary, and the Government generally respected this provision; however, the judicial system was hampered by lack of resources, inefficiency, and reports of possible corruption. The police, divided into regular and paramilitary units under the Ministry of Home Affairs, have primary responsibility for maintaining law and order. The Zambia Security and Intelligence Service (ZSIS), under the Office of the President, is responsible for intelligence and internal security. Civilian authorities maintained effective control of the security forces. Members of the security forces committed numerous serious human rights abuses. Approximately 60 percent of the labor force worked in agriculture, although agriculture contributed only 15 percent to the gross domestic product. Economic growth increased to 4 percent for the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Economy Diagnostic Exercise- Zambia
    POLITICAL ECONOMY DIAGNOSTIC EXERCISE- ZAMBIA Final Report th 5 August 2011 Rachel Flanary, Denis Wood, Craig Mathieson and Diana Cammack Church & Court Barn, Church Lane Tickenham, Bristol, BS21 6SD United Kingdom Tel: +44 1275 811 345 [email protected] www.theIDLgroup.com POLITICAL ECONOMY DIAGNOSTIC EXERCISE- ZAMBIA Final Report 5th August 2011 The IDL Group Ltd Church and Court Barn Church Lane Tickenham Bristol BS21 6SD United Kingdom Tel: +44 1275 811345 Fax: +44 1275 811333 Email: [email protected] Web: www.theIDLgroup.com Prepared by: Rachel Flanary Reviewed by: Rachel Percy Approved by: © theIDLgroup 2011 Political Economy Diagnostic Exercise- Zambia Acknowledgements The study team would like to thank USAID/Zambia and in particular Adam Jung for the support received and the assistance provided in setting up meetings and sending relevant document. Much of this work was carried out during a particularly busy period for USAID staff, as people were preparing for the new country strategy. We appreciate the extra effort that has been taken in meeting us for discussions, answering our many questions and sending through relevant documentation. We interviewed stakeholders in Lusaka and in Eastern Province. We would like to thank the people who were generous with their time, who helped us in the field, and who organised meetings for us. Thanks to you all. Political Economy Diagnostic Exercise- Zambia Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………………………………… (i) 1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Populism in Zambia: Michael Sata's Rise
    This is the accepted version of the article which is published by Sage in International Political Science Review, Volume: 38 issue: 4, page(s): 456-472 available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512117720809 Accepted version downloaded from SOAS Research Online: http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/24592/ Post-populism in Zambia: Michael Sata’s rise, demise and legacy Alastair Fraser SOAS University of London, UK Abstract Models explaining populism as a policy response to the interests of the urban poor struggle to understand the instability of populist mobilisations. A focus on political theatre is more helpful. This article extends the debate on populist performance, showing how populists typically do not produce rehearsed performances to passive audiences. In drawing ‘the people’ on stage they are forced to improvise. As a result, populist performances are rarely sustained. The article describes the Zambian Patriotic Front’s (PF) theatrical insurrection in 2006 and its evolution over the next decade. The PF’s populist aspect had faded by 2008 and gradually disappeared in parallel with its leader Michael Sata’s ill-health and eventual death in 2014. The party was nonetheless electorally successful. The article accounts for this evolution and describes a ‘post-populist’ legacy featuring hyper- partisanship, violence and authoritarianism. Intolerance was justified in the populist moment as a reflection of anger at inequality; it now floats free of any programme. Keywords Elections, populism, political theatre, Laclau, Zambia, Sata, Patriotic Front Introduction This article both contributes to the thin theoretic literature on ‘post-populism’ and develops an illustrative case. It discusses the explosive arrival of the Patriotic Front (PF) on the Zambian electoral scene in 2006 and the party’s subsequent evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict Structural Vulnerability Assessment (SVA) - Zambia
    Conflict Structural Vulnerability Assessment (SVA) - Zambia Supported by: UNDP Support to Election Cycle Project in Zambia November, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgement........................................................................................................ iv Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... v Main Findings ................................................................................................................ v Recommendations ...................................................................................................... vii SECTION ONE: BACKGROUND TO THE STRUCTURAL VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT (SVA) ..................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview of Key SVA Concepts ............................................................................. 1 1.1.1Structural Causes of Conflict ............................................................................ 2 1.1.2 Proximate Causes of Conflict ........................................................................... 2 1.1.3 Triggers of Conflict ........................................................................................... 2 1.1.4 Actors .............................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Goal and Objectives of the Study ........................................................................... 4 1.3 Study Questions ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Intra-Party Democracy in the Zambian Polity1
    John Bwalya, Owen B. Sichone: REFRACTORY FRONTIER: INTRA-PARTY … REFRACTORY FRONTIER: INTRA-PARTY DEMOCRACY IN THE ZAMBIAN POLITY1 John Bwalya Owen B. Sichone Abstract: Despite the important role that intra-party democracy plays in democratic consolidation, particularly in third-wave democracies, it has not received as much attention as inter-party democracy. Based on the Zambian polity, this article uses the concept of selectocracy to explain why, to a large extent, intra-party democracy has remained a refractory frontier. Two traits of intra-party democracy are examined: leadership transitions at party president-level and the selection of political party members for key leadership positions. The present study of four political parties: United National Independence Party (UNIP), Movement for Multiparty Democracy (MMD), United Party for National Development (UPND) and Patriotic Front (PF) demonstrates that the iron law of oligarchy predominates leadership transitions and selection. Within this milieu, intertwined but fluid factors, inimical to democratic consolidation but underpinning selectocracy, are explained. Keywords: Intra-party Democracy, Leadership Transition, Ethnicity, Selectocracy, Third Wave Democracies Introduction Although there is a general consensus that political parties are essential to liberal democracy (Teorell 1999; Matlosa 2007; Randall 2007; Omotola 2010; Ennser-Jedenastik and Müller 2015), they often failed to live up to the expected democratic values such as sustaining intra-party democracy (Rakner and Svasånd 2013). As a result, some scholars have noted that parties may therefore not necessarily be good for democratic consolidation because they promote private economic interests, which are inimical to democracy and state building (Aaron 1 The authors gratefully acknowledge the comments from the editorial staff and anonymous reviewers.
    [Show full text]
  • May-2021-Edition-5-1
    MONTHLY Socialist SOCIALISTPARTY ISSUE 10, APRIL/MAY 2021 A newsletter published by the Socialist Party, Lusaka, Zambia FREE OF CHARGE The August elections give us a chance to SocialistYou, staff reporter the poor, SOCIALIST Party president Fred M’membe change told a presentation of parliamentary and local government candidates that it was the majority who should be ruling Zambia. everything “Who are the majority in this country? They say democracy is majority rule. If it’s the poor who are the majority, why don’t they rule? This year, and build a you, the poor, should rule,” must rule he said. Dr M’membe was speaking more just at Kingfisher Garden Court in Lusaka at the unveiling cer- emony for 34 parliamentary and three local government and caring candidates. He asked them, “Was Jesus rich or poor? Were his society disciples rich or poor? When choosing a chief, did they choose the rich or the wise? yourselves “Does having money Fred M’membe says majority can end poverty amount to being wise? Is leadership about money?” Dr M’membe said that, for the most part, those who ruled lived well but those who were governed suffered, add- ing that the poor had not ruled Zambia since independence. “They use you like a ladder when climbing on to a wall and when they are at the top they drop the ladder,” he said. And he warned what would happen if the poor did not take control in the August elections this year. “If you, poor people, don’t rule, pov- erty will not end,” he said.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Elections and Peacebuilding in Zambia Assessment Final Report
    Elections and Peacebuilding in Zambia Assessment Final Report Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 3 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 8 I. Structural Vulnerabilities ................................................................................................. 9 A. Political Factors.............................................................................................................. 9 B. Social Factors ............................................................................................................... 11 Table 1 .............................................................................................................................. 14 Composition of Members of Parliament by Gender since 1994 ....................................... 14 C. Economic Factors ......................................................................................................... 14 D. Security Factors............................................................................................................ 14 II. Vulnerabilities Specific to the 2011 Election ............................................................... 15 A. Electoral Administration .............................................................................................. 15 B. Parallel Vote Tabulation (PVT) ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation Report Nimd – Programme in Zambia 2004-2007
    EVALUATION REPORT NIMD – PROGRAMME IN ZAMBIA 2004-2007 December 2007 Nadia Molenaers [email protected] IOB-University of Antwerp, Belgium TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS………………………………………………………………………3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY…………………………………………………………………………4 I.INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………………….5 I.1. Working with political parties - NIMD: mission, vision, strategy I.2. Terms of Reference and a note on methodology II.ZAMBIAN POLITICAL HISTORY AND CONTEXT ………………………………………………….9 II.1. Independence and the formation of a one-party State: Kaunda’s legacy II.2. 1991: The first multi-party elections, the first alternation of power II.3. From multi-party to dominant party system? Chiluba seeking a third term II.4. MMD continues to rule: Mwanawasa consolidates the dominant party system II.5. Is the power balance slowly tilting towards a second real alternation in power? II.6. An overall assessment of the political situation III.EVALUATING THE NIMD PROGRAMME IN ZAMBIA……………………………………………15 III.1. Facts and Figures III.2. Perceptions and views III.3. Perceptions with regards to the institutional set-up of ZCID IV. CONCLUSIONS……………………………………………………………………………......................39 LIST OF INTERVIEWED PEOPLE……………………………………………………………………….41 ANNEX: TERMS OF REFERENCE……………………………………………………………………….42 2 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS FDD: Forum for Democracy and Development HP: Heritage Party IPB: Inter Party Bureau MMD: Movement for Multiparty Democracy NCC: National Constitution Conference NIMD: Netherlands Institute Multiparty Democracy PF: Patriotic Front SoP: Summit of Presidents ULP: United Liberal Party UNIP: United National Independence Party UPND: United Party for National Development ZCID: Zambian Center for Interparty Dialogue 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY1 “The thing that threatens ZCID yet at the same time is its driving force is the turbulent nature of politics and political parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authorities Review of Operations
    Republic of Zambia REPORT OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL ON THE REVIEW OF OPERATIONS OF LOCAL AUTHORITIES FOR THE FINANCIAL YEARS ENDED 31ST DECEMBER 2013, 2014 and 2015 Price: 60.00 REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA REPORT OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL ON THE REVIEW OF OPERATIONS OF LOCAL AUTHORITIES FOR THE FINANCIAL YEARS ENDED 31ST DECEMBER 2013, 2014 and 2015 K60.00 REPORT OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL - REVIEW OF OPERATIONS OF LOCAL AUTHORITIES Preamble Local Authorities are public institutions established by an Act of Parliament under Section 3 of the Local Government Act, Cap 281 of the Laws of Zambia and are Government institutions. The main objective of establishing Councils is to provide services on behalf of Central Government to residents within their areas of jurisdictions. Currently, there are one hundred and five (105) councils spread out in all the districts. In this regard, Local Authorities are a key factor in socio-economic development because their operations are directly linked to community activities. An effective monitoring of their operations is, therefore, inevitable in ensuring sustainable economic and environmental development in the country. The Constitution of Zambia Amendment Act No. 2 (2016) devolves powers to the Local Authorities (LA) in the quest to decentralize the operations of Government as all the Government departments and institutions will now be managed at the local authority level. This therefore, entails that there should be greater accountability on the part of the local authorities as they will now be responsible for a lot of government resources for onward service delivery to the general citizenry. In this regard, Article 250 (1) (i) of the Constitution of Zambia Amendment Act No.
    [Show full text]