Tai Po Kau Headland Conservation Study & SSSI Proposal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tai Po Kau Headland Conservation Study & SSSI Proposal Tai Po Kau Headland Conservation Study & S.S.S.I. Proposal Tai Po Kau Headland Conservation Study and S.S.S.I. Proposal 18 July 2006 Proposal Proponents Mrs. G. Barretto M.B.E., V.M.M. Mr. L. A. Barretto A.R.I.B.A. Mrs. K. A. Barretto B.A. Mr. R. O. Barretto S.C. Editors Dr. R. C. Kendrick Ph.D. Mr. R. O. Barretto S.C. Authors Dr. G. W. J. Ades Ph.D. Mrs. K. A. Barretto B.A. Mr. R.O. Barretto S.C. Dr. R. C. Kendrick Ph.D. Mr. M. Kilburn B.A. Dr. M. W. N. Lau Ph.D. Mr. R. W. Lewthwaite B.A. Dr. Ng S. C. Ph.D. Tolo Pond Mangrove Core Headland Area Pai Mun Shan (Area 40) Tolo Pond Mangrove Pai Mun Shan (Area 40) buffer zone survey route Figure 3 - Core Headland Area Biodiversity Survey Map as designated in the Tai Po Outline Zoning Plan Figure 4. Zones in the Tai Po Kau Headland area Tai Po Kau Headland Conservation Study and SSSI Proposal July 2006 Contents PART A – INTRODUCTION 6 1 SUMMARY 6 2 BACKGROUND 10 3 RATIONALE 14 4 OBJECTIVES 25 PART B – TAI PO KAU HEADLAND INFORMATION 26 5 SITE DEFINITION 26 6 PHYSICAL INFORMATION 28 7 BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION 29 8 CULTURAL INFORMATION 43 PART C – EVALUATION 48 9 SITE EVALUATION 48 10 ECOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROTECTION MEASURES 55 11 CONCLUSIONS 61 PART D - ENDNOTES 63 12 REFERENCES 64 13 APPENDICES 67 1 Full Table of Contents PART A – INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................6 1 SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................................6 2 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................ 10 2.1 HERITAGE FACTORS ......................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.1 Early History ............................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.2 Early New Territories Architecture............................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.3 Heritage Landscape Value ........................................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 SITE VALUES....................................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.3 AMENITY ACCESS .............................................................................................................................................................. 11 2.4 THE TAI PO LANDSCAPE AND RECREATION STUDY FINAL REPORT OF JANUARY 1979 .................................... 11 2.4.1 Vegetation Pattern........................................................................................................................................................ 11 2.4.2 Feng Shui Woodland .................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.4.3 Headland Vegetation Potential..................................................................................................................................... 11 2.4.4 Landscape Quality........................................................................................................................................................ 11 2.4.5 Recreation Demand....................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.4.6 Conservation Interest..................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.4.7 Hillslope Woodland Policy............................................................................................................................................ 12 2.4.8 Tai Po Report Conclusion............................................................................................................................................. 12 2.5 MATURE NATIVE WOODLAND HISTORY ..................................................................................................................... 12 2.6 CURRENT STUDIES ............................................................................................................................................................ 13 3 RATIONALE ............................................................................................................................................. 14 3.1 THE CONSERVATION PROPOSAL.................................................................................................................................... 14 3.1.1 Existing Zoning............................................................................................................................................................ 14 3.1.2 Problems of Existing Zoning......................................................................................................................................... 14 3.1.2.1 Adjacent Areas Lost to Development ..................................................................................................................................14 3.1.2.2 Developments In Progress and Planned..............................................................................................................................15 3.2 LAND USE HISTORY AND PLANNING ISSUES............................................................................................................... 15 3.2.1 History of Land Use at and near Tai Po Kau Headland - Planning constraints and parameters. ................................. 15 3.2.2 Summary of Recent relevant Planning History re TPIL12............................................................................................ 15 3.2.2.1 Land and Planning History .....................................................................................................................................................15 3.2.2.2 Developmental Pressures ........................................................................................................................................................16 3.2.2.3 TPIL12 Access ..........................................................................................................................................................................16 3.2.2.4 Unauthorised Tree Cutting .....................................................................................................................................................16 3.2.2.5 1997 Re-zoning Proposal ........................................................................................................................................................16 3.2.2.6 More Unauthorised Tree Damage.........................................................................................................................................17 3.2.2.7 1998 Planning Application......................................................................................................................................................17 3.2.2.8 Dual Planning Applications ....................................................................................................................................................17 3.2.2.9 2001 Planning Application......................................................................................................................................................17 3.2.2.10 Conditions to Protect Site Ecology.......................................................................................................................................17 3.2.2.11 Insufficiency of Tree Surveys .................................................................................................................................................18 3.3 PROBLEMS DUE TO OVER DEVELOPMENT.................................................................................................................... 19 3.4 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT - IMPORTANT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER AND LANDSCAPE VALUE............................. 21 3.5 COMPENSATION, CONSERVATION AREA AND SSSI AND SPECIAL AREA .............................................................. 21 3.6 CREATE NEW CONSERVATION ZONES TO COMPENSATE FOR LOSS TO DEVELOPMENT ...................................... 22 3.7 MITIGATION OPPORTUNITY ........................................................................................................................................... 22 3.8 GOVERNMENT MANPOWER REQUIREMENTS.............................................................................................................. 22 3.9 PREVIOUS ZONING CASES............................................................................................................................................... 23 3.10 PROPOSAL CONFORMITY ................................................................................................................................................. 23 3.11 CONCLUSIONS.................................................................................................................................................................... 23 3.12 RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve Moth Survey 2009
    Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve Moth Survey 2009 Fauna Conservation Department Kadoorie Farm & Botanic Garden 29 June 2010 Kadoorie Farm and Botanic Garden Publication Series: No 6 Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve moth survey 2009 Fung Yuen SSSI & Butterfly Reserve Moth Survey 2009 Executive Summary The objective of this survey was to generate a moth species list for the Butterfly Reserve and Site of Special Scientific Interest [SSSI] at Fung Yuen, Tai Po, Hong Kong. The survey came about following a request from Tai Po Environmental Association. Recording, using ultraviolet light sources and live traps in four sub-sites, took place on the evenings of 24 April and 16 October 2009. In total, 825 moths representing 352 species were recorded. Of the species recorded, 3 meet IUCN Red List criteria for threatened species in one of the three main categories “Critically Endangered” (one species), “Endangered” (one species) and “Vulnerable” (one species” and a further 13 species meet “Near Threatened” criteria. Twelve of the species recorded are currently only known from Hong Kong, all are within one of the four IUCN threatened or near threatened categories listed. Seven species are recorded from Hong Kong for the first time. The moth assemblages recorded are typical of human disturbed forest, feng shui woods and orchards, with a relatively low Geometridae component, and includes a small number of species normally associated with agriculture and open habitats that were found in the SSSI site. Comparisons showed that each sub-site had a substantially different assemblage of species, thus the site as a whole should retain the mosaic of micro-habitats in order to maintain the high moth species richness observed.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Ghats), Idukki District, Kerala, India
    International Journal of Entomology Research International Journal of Entomology Research ISSN: 2455-4758 Impact Factor: RJIF 5.24 www.entomologyjournals.com Volume 3; Issue 2; March 2018; Page No. 114-120 The moths (Lepidoptera: Heterocera) of vagamon hills (Western Ghats), Idukki district, Kerala, India Pratheesh Mathew, Sekar Anand, Kuppusamy Sivasankaran, Savarimuthu Ignacimuthu* Entomology Research Institute, Loyola College, University of Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India Abstract The present study was conducted at Vagamon hill station to evaluate the biodiversity of moths. During the present study, a total of 675 moth specimens were collected from the study area which represented 112 species from 16 families and eight super families. Though much of the species has been reported earlier from other parts of India, 15 species were first records for the state of Kerala. The highest species richness was shown by the family Erebidae and the least by the families Lasiocampidae, Uraniidae, Notodontidae, Pyralidae, Yponomeutidae, Zygaenidae and Hepialidae with one species each. The results of this preliminary study are promising; it sheds light on the unknown biodiversity of Vagamon hills which needs to be strengthened through comprehensive future surveys. Keywords: fauna, lepidoptera, biodiversity, vagamon, Western Ghats, Kerala 1. Introduction Ghats stretches from 8° N to 22° N. Due to increasing Arthropods are considered as the most successful animal anthropogenic activities the montane grasslands and adjacent group which consists of more than two-third of all animal forests face several threats (Pramod et al. 1997) [20]. With a species on earth. Class Insecta comprise about 90% of tropical wide array of bioclimatic and topographic conditions, the forest biomass (Fatimah & Catherine 2002) [10].
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Threatened Taxa
    The Journal of Threatened Taxa (JoTT) is dedicated to building evidence for conservaton globally by publishing peer-reviewed artcles OPEN ACCESS online every month at a reasonably rapid rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org. All artcles published in JoTT are registered under Creatve Commons Atributon 4.0 Internatonal License unless otherwise mentoned. JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproducton, and distributon of artcles in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publicaton. Journal of Threatened Taxa Building evidence for conservaton globally www.threatenedtaxa.org ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Communication Bat diversity in the Banpale forest, Pokhara, Nepal during spring season Prabhat Kiran Bhatarai, Basant Sharma, Anisha Neupane, Sunita Kunwar & Pratyush Dhungana 26 May 2021 | Vol. 13 | No. 6 | Pages: 18479–18489 DOI: 10.11609/jot.6263.13.6.18479-18489 For Focus, Scope, Aims, and Policies, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/aims_scope For Artcle Submission Guidelines, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/submissions For Policies against Scientfc Misconduct, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/policies_various For reprints, contact <[email protected]> The opinions expressed by the authors do not refect the views of the Journal of Threatened Taxa, Wildlife Informaton Liaison Development Society, Zoo Outreach Organizaton, or any of the partners. The journal, the publisher, the host, and the part- Publisher & Host ners are not responsible for the
    [Show full text]
  • Andhra Pradesh
    PROFILES OF SELECTED NATIONAL PARKS AND SANCTUARIES OF INDIA JULY 2002 EDITED BY SHEKHAR SINGH ARPAN SHARMA INDIAN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION NEW DELHI CONTENTS STATE NAME OF THE PA ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR CAMPBELL BAY NATIONAL PARK ISLANDS GALATHEA NATIONAL PARK MOUNT HARRIET NATIONAL PARK NORTH BUTTON ISLAND NATIONAL PARK MIDDLE BUTTON ISLAND NATIONAL PARK SOUTH BUTTON ISLAND NATIONAL PARK RANI JHANSI MARINE NATIONAL PARK WANDOOR MARINE NATIONAL PARK CUTHBERT BAY WILDLIFE SANCTUARY GALATHEA BAY WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INGLIS OR EAST ISLAND SANCTUARY INTERVIEW ISLAND SANCTUARY LOHABARRACK OR SALTWATER CROCODILE SANCTUARY ANDHRA PRADESH ETURUNAGARAM SANCTUARY KAWAL WILDLIFE SANCTUARY KINNERSANI SANCTUARY NAGARJUNASAGAR-SRISAILAM TIGER RESERVE PAKHAL SANCTUARY PAPIKONDA SANCTUARY PRANHITA WILDLIFE SANCTUARY ASSAM MANAS NATIONAL PARK GUJARAT BANSDA NATIONAL PARK PURNA WILDLIFE SANCTUARY HARYANA NAHAR SANCTUARY KALESAR SANCTUARY CHHICHHILA LAKE SANCTUARY ABUBSHEHAR SANCTUARY BIR BARA VAN JIND SANCTUARY BIR SHIKARGAH SANCTUARY HIMACHAL PRADESH PONG LAKE SANCTUARY RUPI BHABA SANCTUARY SANGLA SANCTUARY KERALA SILENT VALLEY NATIONAL PARK ARALAM SANCTUARY CHIMMONY SANCTUARY PARAMBIKULAM SANCTUARY PEECHI VAZHANI SANCTUARY THATTEKAD BIRD SANCTUARY WAYANAD WILDLIFE SANCTUARY MEGHALAYA BALPAKARAM NATIONAL PARK SIJU WILDLIFE SANCTUARY NOKREK NATIONAL PARK NONGKHYLLEM WILDLIFE SANCTUARY MIZORAM MURLEN NATIONAL PARK PHAWNGPUI (BLUE MOUNTAIN) NATIONAL 2 PARK DAMPA WILDLIFE SANCTUARY KHAWNGLUNG WILDLIFE SANCTUARY LENGTENG WILDLIFE SANCTUARY NGENGPUI WILDLIFE
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Morphology of the Male Genitalia in Lepidoptera
    COMPARATIVE MORPHOLOGY OF THE MALE GENITALIA IN LEPIDOPTERA. By DEV RAJ MEHTA, M. Sc.~ Ph. D. (Canta.b.), 'Univefsity Scholar of the Government of the Punjab, India (Department of Zoology, University of Oambridge). CONTENTS. PAGE. Introduction 197 Historical Review 199 Technique. 201 N ontenclature 201 Function • 205 Comparative Morphology 206 Conclusions in Phylogeny 257 Summary 261 Literature 1 262 INTRODUCTION. In the domains of both Morphology and Taxonomy the study' of Insect genitalia has evoked considerable interest during the past half century. Zander (1900, 1901, 1903) suggested a common structural plan for the genitalia in various orders of insects. This work stimulated further research and his conclusions were amplified by Crampton (1920) who homologized the different parts in the genitalia of Hymenoptera, Mecoptera, Neuroptera, Diptera, Trichoptera Lepidoptera, Hemiptera and Strepsiptera with those of more generalized insects like the Ephe­ meroptera and Thysanura. During this time the use of genitalic charac­ ters for taxonomic purposes was also realized particularly in cases where the other imaginal characters had failed to serve. In this con­ nection may be mentioned the work of Buchanan White (1876), Gosse (1883), Bethune Baker (1914), Pierce (1909, 1914, 1922) and others. Also, a comparative account of the genitalia, as a basis for the phylo­ genetic study of different insect orders, was employed by Walker (1919), Sharp and Muir (1912), Singh-Pruthi (1925) and Cole (1927), in Orthop­ tera, Coleoptera, Hemiptera and the Diptera respectively. It is sur­ prising, work of this nature having been found so useful in these groups, that an important order like the Lepidoptera should have escaped careful analysis at the hands of the morphologists.
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong's Bad Biodiversity
    JULY 2001 NUMBER 23 Porcupine! Newsletter of the Department of Ecology & Biodiversity, The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong's Bad Biodiversity Aliens - also known as exotics or introduced species - are species which did not occur here naturally but have been brought to Hong Kong by humans, either deliberately, as crops, ornamentals, domestic animals or pets, or accidentally, as stowaways in ships and cargo planes, as seeds or eggs in soil, or attached to shoes or clothing. Most species which arrive in this way do not "escape" to form wild populations, and most of the species which have escaped are confined to places that are continually disturbed by humans. The weeds of cultivated areas, roadsides and urban wasteland are mostly exotics, as are the fish in concrete channels, and such conspicuous urban invertebrates as the "American" Cockroach and the Giant African Snail. Most of these urban exotics are doing no obvious harm and some contribute positively to the quality of city life. However, they also form the pool of species from which are drawn the small number of ecologically-damaging ones: the invasive species. Invasive species are aliens that invade natural or semi-natural communities. Out of the 150 or so well-established alien plant species in Hong Kong, less than a dozen have become invasive. The climbing American composite Mikania micrantha – Mile-a-Minute – is the most obvious example, but even this is confined to relatively disturbed sites. The "success" rate seems to be higher among birds and mammals, but the species which have done well in natural habitats are all from tropical East Asia and are apparently occupying niches vacated by the loss of the same or closely-related species when Hong Kong was deforested centuries ago.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive DNA Barcode Library for the Looper Moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) of British Columbia, Canada
    AComprehensiveDNABarcodeLibraryfortheLooper Moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) of British Columbia, Canada Jeremy R. deWaard1,2*, Paul D. N. Hebert3, Leland M. Humble1,4 1 Department of Forest Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2 Entomology, Royal British Columbia Museum, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 3 Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, 4 Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada Abstract Background: The construction of comprehensive reference libraries is essential to foster the development of DNA barcoding as a tool for monitoring biodiversity and detecting invasive species. The looper moths of British Columbia (BC), Canada present a challenging case for species discrimination via DNA barcoding due to their considerable diversity and limited taxonomic maturity. Methodology/Principal Findings: By analyzing specimens held in national and regional natural history collections, we assemble barcode records from representatives of 400 species from BC and surrounding provinces, territories and states. Sequence variation in the barcode region unambiguously discriminates over 93% of these 400 geometrid species. However, a final estimate of resolution success awaits detailed taxonomic analysis of 48 species where patterns of barcode variation suggest cases of cryptic species, unrecognized synonymy as well as young species. Conclusions/Significance: A catalog of these taxa meriting further taxonomic investigation is presented as well as the supplemental information needed to facilitate these investigations. Citation: deWaard JR, Hebert PDN, Humble LM (2011) A Comprehensive DNA Barcode Library for the Looper Moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) of British Columbia, Canada. PLoS ONE 6(3): e18290. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018290 Editor: Sergios-Orestis Kolokotronis, American Museum of Natural History, United States of America Received August 31, 2010; Accepted March 2, 2011; Published March 28, 2011 Copyright: ß 2011 deWaard et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Range of a Palearctic Uraniid Moth Eversmannia Exornata
    Org Divers Evol (2015) 15:285–300 DOI 10.1007/s13127-014-0195-1 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Range of a Palearctic uraniid moth Eversmannia exornata (Lepidoptera: Uraniidae: Epipleminae) was split in the Holocene, as evaluated using histone H1 and COI genes with reference to the Beringian disjunction in the genus Oreta (Lepidoptera: Drepanidae) Vladimir I. Solovyev & Vera S. Bogdanova & Vladimir V. Dubatolov & Oleg E. Kosterin Received: 7 November 2013 /Accepted: 5 December 2014 /Published online: 24 December 2014 # Gesellschaft für Biologische Systematik 2014 Abstract Large-scale climatic cycling during the Pleistocene COI gene fragment appeared to have two alleles differing by resulted in repeated split and fusion of species ranges in high one synonymous substitution; both alleles co-occurring in the northern latitudes. Disjunctions of ranges of some Eurasian European population. The histone H1 gene had two dimorphic species associated with nemoral communities used to be dated synonymous sites, with both variants of one site found in all to ‘glacial time’, with existence of their contiguous ranges three isolates. Absence of accumulated difference in both reconstructed not later than 1 mya, while a recent hypothesis genes and polymorphism for the same synonymous substitu- associates them with the Boreal time of the Holocene and tion in the H1 gene in all three parts of the range suggests a reconstructs the contiguous ranges ca 5 thousand years ago. very recent disjunction which cannot be resolved by coding These estimates differing by almost 3 orders of magnitude gene sequences. This well corresponds to the Holocene dis- appealed for their testing via molecular methods. We made junction hypothesis and rules out the Pliocene/early such a test for Eversmannia exornata (Lepidoptera: Pleistocene disjunction hypothesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Threatened Taxa
    The Journal of Threatened Taxa (JoTT) is dedicated to building evidence for conservaton globally by publishing peer-reviewed artcles OPEN ACCESS online every month at a reasonably rapid rate at www.threatenedtaxa.org. All artcles published in JoTT are registered under Creatve Commons Atributon 4.0 Internatonal License unless otherwise mentoned. JoTT allows unrestricted use, reproducton, and distributon of artcles in any medium by providing adequate credit to the author(s) and the source of publicaton. Journal of Threatened Taxa Building evidence for conservaton globally www.threatenedtaxa.org ISSN 0974-7907 (Online) | ISSN 0974-7893 (Print) Short Communication Diversity pattern of butterfly communities (Lepidoptera) in different habitat types of Nahan, Himachal Pradesh, India Suveena Thakur, Suneet Bahrdwaj & Amar Paul Singh 26 July 2021 | Vol. 13 | No. 8 | Pages: 19137–19143 DOI: 10.11609/jot.7095.13.8.19137-19143 For Focus, Scope, Aims, and Policies, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/aims_scope For Artcle Submission Guidelines, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/about/submissions For Policies against Scientfc Misconduct, visit htps://threatenedtaxa.org/index.php/JoTT/policies_various For reprints, contact <[email protected]> The opinions expressed by the authors do not refect the views of the Journal of Threatened Taxa, Wildlife Informaton Liaison Development Society, Zoo Outreach Organizaton, or any of the partners. The journal, the publisher, the host, and the part- Publisher & Host ners are not responsible
    [Show full text]
  • PACIFIC INSECTS MONOGRAPH Ll
    PACIFIC INSECTS MONOGRAPH ll Lepidoptera of American Samoa with particular reference to biology and ecology By John Adams Comstock Published by Entomology Department, Bernice P. Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawaii, U. S. A. 1966 PACIFIC INSECTS MONOGRAPHS Published by Entomology Department, Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii, 96819, U. S. A. Editorial Committee: J. L. Gressitt, Editor (Honolulu), S. Asahina (Tokyo), R. G. Fennah (London), R. A. Harrison (Christchurch), T. C. Maa (Honolulu & Taipei), C. W. Sabrosky (Washington, D. C), R. L. Usinger (Berkeley), J. van der Vecht (Leiden), K. Yasumatsu (Fukuoka), E. C. Zimmerman (New Hampshire). Assistant Editors: P. D. Ashlock (Honolulu), Carol Higa (Honolulu), Naoko Kunimori (Fukuoka), Setsuko Nakata (Honolulu), Toshi Takata (Fukuoka). Business Manager: C. M. Yoshimoto (Honolulu). Business Assistant: Doris Anbe (Honolulu). Business Agent in Japan: K. Yasumatsu (Fukuoka). Entomological staff, Bishop Museum, 1966: Doris Anbe, Hatsuko Arakaki, P. D. Ashlock, S. Azuma, Madaline Boyes, Candida Cardenas, Ann Cutting, M. L. Goff, J. L. Gressitt (Chairman), J. Harrell, Carol Higa, Y. Hirashima, Shirley Hokama, E. Holzapfel, Dorothy Hoxie, Helen Hurd, June Ibara, Naoko Kuni­ mori, T. C. Maa, Grace Nakahashi, Setsuko Nakata (Adm. Asst.), Tulene Nonomura, Carol Okuma, Ka­ tharine Pigue, Linda Reineccius, T. Saigusa, I. Sakakibara, Judy Sakamoto, G. A. Samuelson, Sybil Seto, W. A. Steffan, Amy Suehiro, Grace Thompson, Clara Uchida, J. R. Vockeroth, Nixon Wilson, Mabel Ya- tsuoka, C. M. Yoshimoto, E. C. Zimmermann. Field associates: M. J. Fitzsimons, E. E. Gless, G. E. Lip- pert, V. Peckham, D. S. Rabor, J. Sedlacek, M. Sedlacek, P. Shanahan, R. Straatman, J. Strong, H. M. Tor- revillas, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Back Matter (PDF)
    w Tables 1 and 2 of paper entitled Tabular data relating to three papers in Phil, Trans. R. Soc. bond. B, vol. 286 Speculations on seed dispersal and the flora of the Aldabra archipelago By G. E. Wickf.ns W. Speculations on seed dispersal and the flora of the Aldabra archipelago in Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, vol. 286 By G. E. Wickens F. A twelve month study of insect abundance and composition at various localities on Aldabra Atoll By Dawn W. Frith H.Numbers of plant species on the islands of Aldabra Atoll By Sarah H. Hnatiuk TABLE 1 . CHECK LIST OF THE TERRESTRIAL FLORA: ITS DISTRIBUTION, MODE OF DISPERSAL AND STATUS. Nomenclature follows that accepted for 'The Flora of Ald&bra and Neighbouring Islands' by F.R. Fosberg & S.A. Renvoize (in press). Aid. - Aldabra Ast. - Astove Mad. - Madagascar Ass. - Assumption Sey. - Seychelles Masc. - Mascarenes Cos. - Cosmoledo Afr. - Africa t denotes no longer extant dispersal b ird s c C tn u x) •o ft) d> a 0) ■P 4-> •H 4) c X distribution propagule 90 •H o e s ta tu s 1 . Acrostichum aureum pantropical spore + n a tiv e 2 . Nephrolepis biserrata pantropical spore n a tiv e 3. Annona squamosa pantropical seed + introduced, cult 4. Cissampelos pareira var. hirsuta palaeotropical drupe + n a tiv e 5. Brassica nigra cosmopolitan seed + introduced, cult 6. Capparis cartilaginea palaeotropical 6eed ? n a tiv e 7. Cleome s trig o s a A fr.-M asc. seed ? ? native, strand 8. Gynandropsis gynardra pantropical seed + in tro d u ced , weed 9.
    [Show full text]
  • º'‡ Èõàπõπ§ ∫ (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) ¢Õ߇¢Μ√—°…“Æ
    π‘æπ∏åµâπ©∫—∫ º’‡ ◊ÈÕÀπÕπ§◊∫ (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) ¢Õ߇¢µ√—°…“æ—π∏ÿå —µ«åªÉ“ Œ“≈“-∫“≈“ ®—ßÀ«—¥π√“∏‘«“ »ÿ¿ƒ°…å «—≤π ‘∑∏‘Ï 1 ™—¬«—≤πå ª√–¡«≈2 ÿ√‰°√ ‡æ‘Ë¡§”3 ·≈– »‘√‘æ√ ∑ÕßÕ“√’¬å 4 Abstract Watanasit, S.1, Pramual, C.1, Permkam, S.2, and Thong-Aree, S.3 Geometrid moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) in Hala-Bala Wildlife Sanctuary, Narathiwat Province Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol., 2004, 26(2) : 197-210 The purpose of this research was to investigate the species diversity and abundance of geometrid moths in tropical rain forest of Hala-Bala Wildlife Sanctuary (< 200 meters above sea level), Narathiwat Province, southern Thailand. Field data were collected every 2 months from July 2001 to July 2002. Three light traps were placed 200 meters apart. Moths were collected every 2 hours between 18.00 - 24.00 pm for 1Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, 2Department of Pest Management, Faculty of Natural Resourecs, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90112, 3Peat Swamp Hala-Bala Research Station, Narathiwat, 96160 Thailand. 1«∑.¡. ( —µ««‘∑¬“) √Õß»“ µ√“®“√¬å 2«∑.¡. (𑇫»«‘∑¬“) π—°»÷°…“ ¿“§«‘™“™’««‘∑¬“ §≥–«‘∑¬“»“ µ√å 3Ph.D. (Entomology) √Õß»“ µ√“®“√¬å ¿“§«‘™“°“√®—¥°“√»—µ√Ÿæ◊™ §≥–∑√—欓°√∏√√¡™“µ‘ ¡À“«‘∑¬“≈—¬ ߢ≈“π§√‘π∑√å Õ”‡¿ÕÀ“¥„À≠à ®—ßÀ«—¥ ߢ≈“ 90112 4«∑.¡. (™’««‘∑¬“ªÉ“‰¡â) π—°«‘™“°“√ ∂“π’«‘®—¬ —µ«åªÉ“ ªÉ“æ√ÿªÉ“Œ“≈“-∫“≈“ 96160 π√“∏‘«“ Corresponding e-mail : [email protected] √—∫µâπ©∫—∫ 10 µÿ≈“§¡ 2546 √—∫≈ßæ‘¡æå 18 µÿ≈“§¡ 2546 Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. Geometrid moths in Hala-Bala Wildlife Sanctuary, Narathiwat Vol. 26 No. 2 Mar.-Apr. 2004 198 Watanasit, S., et al. 3 consecutive nights. Seven hundred and fifty six individuals of geometrid moths comprising 5 subfamilies, 17 tribes, 67 genera and 129 species were collected and identified.
    [Show full text]