Tai Po Kau Headland Conservation Study & SSSI Proposal
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Tai Po Kau Headland Conservation Study & S.S.S.I. Proposal Tai Po Kau Headland Conservation Study and S.S.S.I. Proposal 18 July 2006 Proposal Proponents Mrs. G. Barretto M.B.E., V.M.M. Mr. L. A. Barretto A.R.I.B.A. Mrs. K. A. Barretto B.A. Mr. R. O. Barretto S.C. Editors Dr. R. C. Kendrick Ph.D. Mr. R. O. Barretto S.C. Authors Dr. G. W. J. Ades Ph.D. Mrs. K. A. Barretto B.A. Mr. R.O. Barretto S.C. Dr. R. C. Kendrick Ph.D. Mr. M. Kilburn B.A. Dr. M. W. N. Lau Ph.D. Mr. R. W. Lewthwaite B.A. Dr. Ng S. C. Ph.D. Tolo Pond Mangrove Core Headland Area Pai Mun Shan (Area 40) Tolo Pond Mangrove Pai Mun Shan (Area 40) buffer zone survey route Figure 3 - Core Headland Area Biodiversity Survey Map as designated in the Tai Po Outline Zoning Plan Figure 4. Zones in the Tai Po Kau Headland area Tai Po Kau Headland Conservation Study and SSSI Proposal July 2006 Contents PART A – INTRODUCTION 6 1 SUMMARY 6 2 BACKGROUND 10 3 RATIONALE 14 4 OBJECTIVES 25 PART B – TAI PO KAU HEADLAND INFORMATION 26 5 SITE DEFINITION 26 6 PHYSICAL INFORMATION 28 7 BIOLOGICAL INFORMATION 29 8 CULTURAL INFORMATION 43 PART C – EVALUATION 48 9 SITE EVALUATION 48 10 ECOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROTECTION MEASURES 55 11 CONCLUSIONS 61 PART D - ENDNOTES 63 12 REFERENCES 64 13 APPENDICES 67 1 Full Table of Contents PART A – INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................6 1 SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................................6 2 BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................................ 10 2.1 HERITAGE FACTORS ......................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.1 Early History ............................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.2 Early New Territories Architecture............................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.3 Heritage Landscape Value ........................................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 SITE VALUES....................................................................................................................................................................... 10 2.3 AMENITY ACCESS .............................................................................................................................................................. 11 2.4 THE TAI PO LANDSCAPE AND RECREATION STUDY FINAL REPORT OF JANUARY 1979 .................................... 11 2.4.1 Vegetation Pattern........................................................................................................................................................ 11 2.4.2 Feng Shui Woodland .................................................................................................................................................... 11 2.4.3 Headland Vegetation Potential..................................................................................................................................... 11 2.4.4 Landscape Quality........................................................................................................................................................ 11 2.4.5 Recreation Demand....................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.4.6 Conservation Interest..................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.4.7 Hillslope Woodland Policy............................................................................................................................................ 12 2.4.8 Tai Po Report Conclusion............................................................................................................................................. 12 2.5 MATURE NATIVE WOODLAND HISTORY ..................................................................................................................... 12 2.6 CURRENT STUDIES ............................................................................................................................................................ 13 3 RATIONALE ............................................................................................................................................. 14 3.1 THE CONSERVATION PROPOSAL.................................................................................................................................... 14 3.1.1 Existing Zoning............................................................................................................................................................ 14 3.1.2 Problems of Existing Zoning......................................................................................................................................... 14 3.1.2.1 Adjacent Areas Lost to Development ..................................................................................................................................14 3.1.2.2 Developments In Progress and Planned..............................................................................................................................15 3.2 LAND USE HISTORY AND PLANNING ISSUES............................................................................................................... 15 3.2.1 History of Land Use at and near Tai Po Kau Headland - Planning constraints and parameters. ................................. 15 3.2.2 Summary of Recent relevant Planning History re TPIL12............................................................................................ 15 3.2.2.1 Land and Planning History .....................................................................................................................................................15 3.2.2.2 Developmental Pressures ........................................................................................................................................................16 3.2.2.3 TPIL12 Access ..........................................................................................................................................................................16 3.2.2.4 Unauthorised Tree Cutting .....................................................................................................................................................16 3.2.2.5 1997 Re-zoning Proposal ........................................................................................................................................................16 3.2.2.6 More Unauthorised Tree Damage.........................................................................................................................................17 3.2.2.7 1998 Planning Application......................................................................................................................................................17 3.2.2.8 Dual Planning Applications ....................................................................................................................................................17 3.2.2.9 2001 Planning Application......................................................................................................................................................17 3.2.2.10 Conditions to Protect Site Ecology.......................................................................................................................................17 3.2.2.11 Insufficiency of Tree Surveys .................................................................................................................................................18 3.3 PROBLEMS DUE TO OVER DEVELOPMENT.................................................................................................................... 19 3.4 LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT - IMPORTANT LANDSCAPE CHARACTER AND LANDSCAPE VALUE............................. 21 3.5 COMPENSATION, CONSERVATION AREA AND SSSI AND SPECIAL AREA .............................................................. 21 3.6 CREATE NEW CONSERVATION ZONES TO COMPENSATE FOR LOSS TO DEVELOPMENT ...................................... 22 3.7 MITIGATION OPPORTUNITY ........................................................................................................................................... 22 3.8 GOVERNMENT MANPOWER REQUIREMENTS.............................................................................................................. 22 3.9 PREVIOUS ZONING CASES............................................................................................................................................... 23 3.10 PROPOSAL CONFORMITY ................................................................................................................................................. 23 3.11 CONCLUSIONS.................................................................................................................................................................... 23 3.12 RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................................................................................................................