DOCSLIB.ORG

Underground Water Impact Report for the Surat Cumulative Management Area 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Underground Water Impact Report for the Surat Cumulative Management Area 2016 Department of Natural Resources and Mines Office of Groundwater Impact Assessment Underground Water Impact Report for the Surat Cumulative Management Area 2016 This publication has been compiled by The Office of Groundwater Impact Assessment, Department of Natural Resources and Mines. © State of Queensland, 2016 The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. Under this licence you are free, without having to seek our permission, to use this publication in accordance with the licence terms. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The Queensland Government shall not be liable for technical or other errors or omissions contained herein. The reader/user accepts all risks and responsibility for losses, damages, costs and other consequences resulting directly or indirectly from using this information. Contents Tables...................................................................................................................................................... v Figures .................................................................................................................................................... v Appendices .......................................................................................................................................... vii Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................................ ix Summary ............................................................................................................................................... xi Context for this report .............................................................................................................................. xi Current groundwater extraction ............................................................................................................... xi Predicted water level impacts ................................................................................................................. xii Long–term Affected Areas ............................................................................................................. xii Immediately Affected Areas .......................................................................................................... xiii Water Monitoring Strategy ..................................................................................................................... xiv Spring Impact Management Strategy .................................................................................................... xiv Responsible tenure holders ................................................................................................................... xiv Reporting and review .............................................................................................................................. xv 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Water rights of petroleum tenure holders ....................................................................................... 1 1.2 Managing the cumulative impacts of adjacent CSG wells .............................................................. 1 1.3 The Surat Underground Water Impact Report ................................................................................ 3 2 Petroleum and gas production .................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Petroleum and gas production and methods .................................................................................. 4 2.1.1 Conventional petroleum and gas ................................................................................... 4 2.1.2 Coal seam gas ............................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Types of tenures and authorities .................................................................................................... 7 2.2.1 Petroleum tenures ......................................................................................................... 7 2.2.2 Environmental authorities .............................................................................................. 8 2.2.3 Water monitoring authorities .......................................................................................... 8 2.3 Petroleum tenures in the Surat CMA .............................................................................................. 8 2.4 Production areas in the Surat CMA ................................................................................................ 9 2.4.1 Existing coal seam gas production areas .................................................................... 14 2.4.2 Planned coal seam gas production areas ................................................................... 15 2.4.3 Conventional petroleum and gas production areas ..................................................... 16 2.5 Non-petroleum and gas resource activities in the Surat CMA ...................................................... 17 3 Regional landscape and geology .............................................................................................. 19 3.1 Landscape..................................................................................................................................... 19 3.1.1 Topography .................................................................................................................. 19 3.1.2 Surface drainage ......................................................................................................... 19 Underground Water Impact Report for the Surat Cumulative Management Area, Department of Natural Resources and Mines, September 2016 i 3.1.3 Climate ......................................................................................................................... 20 3.1.4 Land use ...................................................................................................................... 20 3.2 Geology ......................................................................................................................................... 22 3.2.1 The Bowen Basin......................................................................................................... 22 3.2.2 The Surat Basin ........................................................................................................... 23 3.2.3 The Clarence-Moreton Basin ....................................................................................... 24 3.2.4 Cenozoic formations .................................................................................................... 24 3.3 Developing the geological model .................................................................................................. 28 3.3.1 Modelling the Condamine Alluvium ............................................................................. 28 3.3.2 Modelling the Main Range Volcanics .......................................................................... 29 3.3.3 Modelling the Surat and Bowen Basin units ................................................................ 29 4 The hydrogeology of the Surat CMA......................................................................................... 33 4.1 The basic concept of groundwater flow ........................................................................................ 33 4.2 Groundwater systems in the Surat CMA ...................................................................................... 34 4.2.1 The Great Artesian Basin ............................................................................................ 34 4.2.2 The Bowen Basin......................................................................................................... 35 4.2.3 Alluvial systems ........................................................................................................... 36 4.2.4 Basalts ......................................................................................................................... 37 4.3 Hydrogeology of the coal sequences ............................................................................................ 40 4.3.1 The Walloon Coal Measures ....................................................................................... 40 4.3.2 The Bandanna Formation ............................................................................................ 42 4.3.3 The Cattle Creek Formation ........................................................................................ 42 4.4 Connectivity................................................................................................................................... 43 4.4.1 The Walloon Coal Measures and the Condamine Alluvium ........................................ 43 4.4.2 The Walloon Coal Measures and the aquifers of the GAB ........................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Dashanpu Dinosaur Fauna of Zigong Sichuan Short Report V - Labyrinthodont Amphibia
    The Dashanpu Dinosaur Fauna of Zigong Sichuan Short Report V - Labyrinthodont Amphibia Zhiming Dong (Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology, Paleoanthropology, Academia Sinica) Vertebrata PalAsiatica Volume XXIII, No. 4 October, 1985 pp. 301-305 Translated by Will Downs Department of Geology Bilby Research Center Northern Arizona University December, 1990 Abstract A brief discussion is presented on the morphological characteristics and phylogenetic position of Sinobrachyops placenticephalus (gen. et sp. nov.). The specimen is derived from the well-known Middle Jurassic Dashanpu dinosaur quarries of Zigong County, Sichaun Province. Sinobrachyops is the youngest geological occurrence of a labyrinthodont amphibian known to date. Its discovery extends the upper geochronological limit for the Labyrinthodontia into the Middle Jurassic. Introduction The first fossils collected from Dashanpu, Zigong, in 1979, were a pair of rhachitomous vertebrae. This discovery created a sense of perplexity among the workers, for the morphology of these pleurocentra and intercentra suggested an assignment to the Labyrinthodontia. This group of amphibians, however, was traditionally believed to have become extinct in the Late Triassic, a traditional concept that must be abandoned if scientific investigation is to be advanced and left unfettered. In 1983 the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology, Paleoanthropology Academia Sinica launched a paleontological expedition in the Shishugou Formation (Middle-Late Jurassic) from the Kelameili region, northeast Jungar Basin, Xinjiang Autonomous Region, where several rhachitomous vertebrae were discovered. Later, a fragmentary skull of a labyrinthodont amphibian was collected, confirming that this group extended into the Middle Jurassic. The discovery from the Shishugou Formation convinced the workers that the rhachitomous vertebrae at Dashanpu belonged to the Labyrinthodontia.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Groundwater Resources
    6. Groundwater Resources Contents 6 Groundwater Resources 6-1 6.1 Regulatory Framework 6-1 6.1.1 Queensland Legislation 6-1 6.2 Existing Environment 6-4 6.2.1 Project Location 6-4 6.2.2 Hydrology and Landforms 6-4 6.2.3 Geology 6-4 6.2.4 Hydrogeology 6-11 6.2.5 Groundwater Use 6-16 6.2.6 Existing Mine Groundwater Monitoring 6-25 6.2.7 Revised Project Baseline Groundwater Monitoring 6-27 6.2.8 Groundwater Levels 6-31 6.2.9 Groundwater Movement 6-35 6.2.10 Inter-aquifer Connectivity 6-38 6.2.11 Surface Water and Groundwater Interaction 6-39 6.2.12 Groundwater Quality 6-39 6.2.13 Environmental Values in the EPP Water 6-47 6.2.14 Conceptual Hydrogeological Model 6-49 6.3 Impact Assessment 6-53 6.3.1 Effects on Groundwater Levels 6-55 6.3.2 Effects on Groundwater Quality 6-72 6.3.3 Effects on Groundwater Users 6-75 6.3.4 Effects on Groundwater Dependent Ecosystems 6-77 6.4 Mitigation Measures 6-77 6.4.1 Groundwater Monitoring Program 6-77 6.4.2 Landholder Bores 6-83 6.4.3 Groundwater Impact Prediction, Validation and Review 6-83 6.4.4 Mitigation Measures for affected Groundwater Users 6-84 6.5 Conclusions 6-84 New Acland Coal Mine Stage 3 Project – Environmental Impact Statement PAGE i 6 Groundwater Resources This Chapter describes the groundwater resources that may be affected by the revised Project, how they might be affected, and the measures required for the mitigation of potential negative effects.
    [Show full text]
  • And Early Jurassic Sediments, and Patterns of the Triassic-Jurassic
    and Early Jurassic sediments, and patterns of the Triassic-Jurassic PAUL E. OLSEN AND tetrapod transition HANS-DIETER SUES Introduction parent answer was that the supposed mass extinc- The Late Triassic-Early Jurassic boundary is fre- tions in the tetrapod record were largely an artifact quently cited as one of the thirteen or so episodes of incorrect or questionable biostratigraphic corre- of major extinctions that punctuate Phanerozoic his- lations. On reexamining the problem, we have come tory (Colbert 1958; Newell 1967; Hallam 1981; Raup to realize that the kinds of patterns revealed by look- and Sepkoski 1982, 1984). These times of apparent ing at the change in taxonomic composition through decimation stand out as one class of the great events time also profoundly depend on the taxonomic levels in the history of life. and the sampling intervals examined. We address Renewed interest in the pattern of mass ex- those problems in this chapter. We have now found tinctions through time has stimulated novel and com- that there does indeed appear to be some sort of prehensive attempts to relate these patterns to other extinction event, but it cannot be examined at the terrestrial and extraterrestrial phenomena (see usual coarse levels of resolution. It requires new fine- Chapter 24). The Triassic-Jurassic boundary takes scaled documentation of specific faunal and floral on special significance in this light. First, the faunal transitions. transitions have been cited as even greater in mag- Stratigraphic correlation of geographically dis- nitude than those of the Cretaceous or the Permian junct rocks and assemblages predetermines our per- (Colbert 1958; Hallam 1981; see also Chapter 24).
    [Show full text]
  • The Mesozoic Megafossil Genus Linguifolium Arber 1917
    Acta Palaeobotanica 55(2): 123–147, 2015 DOI: 10.1515/acpa-2015-0009 The Mesozoic megafossil genus Linguifolium Arber 1917 GARY A. PATTEMORE1, JOHN F. RIGBY 2 and GEOFFREY PLAYFORD 3 1 School of Earth Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia; e-mail: [email protected] 2 School of Earth, Environmental and Biological Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Queensland 4001, Australia; e-mail: [email protected] 3 School of Earth Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia; e-mail: [email protected] Received 24 April 2015; accepted for publication 3 September 2015 ABSTRACT. The plant megafossil genus Linguifolium Arber 1917 is chiefly known from the Middle and Upper Triassic of Gondwana. The range of Linguifolium extended beyond Gondwana by the Late Triassic, persisting there through the earliest Jurassic (Hettangian). The parent plants probably grew in a well-watered, canopied environment. Diagnoses of the genus and four of its species – Linguifolium tenison-woodsii (Shirley 1898) Retallack 1980, L. waitakiense Bell in Bell et al. 1956, L. parvum Holmes & Anderson in Holmes et al. 2010, and L. steinmannii (Solms-Laubach 1899) Arber 1917 – are emended with particular reference to venation and leaf morphology; consequently, the stratigraphic ranges of the species have been more precisely defined. Coalescent venation has previously been reported in some species of Linguifolium and is identified in new material described herein. Although the vast majority of specimens assigned to the genus are from the Upper Triassic, none shows coalescent venation. This character is entirely restricted to the Middle Triassic, in particu- lar to two species: L.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Mineral Resources of the Northern Territory
    Geology and mineral resources of the Northern Territory Ahmad M and Munson TJ (compilers) Northern Territory Geological Survey Special Publication 5 Chapter 41: Eromanga Basin BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE: Munson TJ, 2013. Chapter 41: Eromanga Basin: in Ahmad M and Munson TJ (compilers). ‘Geology and mineral resources of the Northern Territory’. Northern Territory Geological Survey, Special Publication 5. Disclaimer While all care has been taken to ensure that information contained in this publication is true and correct at the time of publication, changes in circumstances after the time of publication may impact on the accuracy of its information. The Northern Territory of Australia gives no warranty or assurance, and makes no representation as to the accuracy of any information or advice contained in this publication, or that it is suitable for your intended use. You should not rely upon information in this publication for the purpose of making any serious business or investment decisions without obtaining independent and/or professional advice in relation to your particular situation. The Northern Territory of Australia disclaims any liability or responsibility or duty of care towards any person for loss or damage caused by any use of, or reliance on the information contained in this publication. Eromanga Basin Current as of May 2012 Chapter 41: EROMANGA BASIN TJ Munson INTRODUCTION geology and regolith). However, the southwestern margins of the basin are exposed in SA and the northeastern part of The ௘Cambrian±"Devonian Warburton Basin, the basin in central Qld is also exposed and has been eroding Carboniferous±Triassic 3edirNa Basin and Jurassic± since the Late Cretaceous.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract: Late Triassic ('Rhaetian') and Jurassic Palynostratigraphy of The
    172 LATE TRIASSIC ('RHAETIAN') AND JURASSIC PALYNOSTRATIGRAPHY OF THE SURAT BASIN J.L. McKellar Geological Survey of Queensland, GPO Box 194, Brisbane, 4001 BIOGRAPHY John McKellar joined the Geological Survey of Queensland in 1968. Since obtaining his B.Sc. from the University of Queensland in 1971, he has worked at the Survey as a palynologist where he has been involved with studies of various Late Palaeozoic to Mesozoic basins in Queensland. Currently, his main interests lie in the taxonomy and biostratigraphy of spore-pollen floras from the Jurassic of the Surat Basin. Data c~er i ved from this research project are also being used to provide the basis for a Ph.D. thesis at the University of Queensland~ His work in the Jurassic is soon to be extended into the Eromanga Basin in order to service the stratigraphic drilling programme presently being undertaken there by the Survey. SUl'vi~1ARY In the Jurassic of eastern Australia, the principal palynological zonation in use is that devised by Evans (1963, 1966). This scheme, which was based primarily on data derived from the Surat and Eromanga Basins, has been var• iously modified (eg. Burger, 1968; Burger & Senior, 1979) as new distribu• tion data have become available. In the Surat Basin, the development of a more formal zonation has been limited to the Early Jurassic with the work of Reiser & Williams (1969). However, the zonations of de .Jersey (1975, 1976), which are developed mainly for the sequence in the lower part of the Moreton Basin, also have application in the basal succession (Precipice Sandstone and Evergreen Formation) of the Surat Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Morphology of Stereospondyl Amphibian Skulls
    Functional Morphology of Stereospondyl Amphibian Skulls Samantha Clare Penrice Doctor of Philosophy School of Life Sciences College of Science July 2018 Functional morphology of stereospondyl amphibian skulls Stereospondyls were the most diverse clade of early tetrapods, spanning 190 million years, with over 250 species belonging to eight taxonomic groups. They had a range of morphotypes and have been found on every continent. Stereospondyl phylogeny is widely contested and repeatedly examined but despite these studies, we are still left with the question, why were they so successful and why did they die out? A group-wide analysis of functional morphology, informing us about their palaeobiology, was lacking for this group and was carried out in order to address the questions of their success and demise. Based on an original photograph collection, size independent skull morphometrics were used, in conjunction with analyses of the fossil record and comparative anatomy, to provide a synthesis of the functional morphology of stereospondyl amphibians. Stereospondyls originated in the Carboniferous and most taxonomic groups were extinct at the end of the Triassic. The early Triassic had exceptionally high numbers of short- lived genera, in habitats that were mostly arid but apparently experienced occasional monsoon rains. Genera turnover slowed and diversity was stable in the Middle Triassic, then declined with a series of extinctions of the Late Triassic. Stereospondyls showed the pattern of ‘disaster’ taxa: rapidly diversifying following a mass extinction, spreading to a global distribution, although this high diversity was relatively short-lived. Geometric morphometrics on characteristics of the skull and palate was carried out to assess general skull morphology and identified the orbital position and skull outline to be the largest sources of skull variation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of NSW
    The Geology of NSW The geological characteristics and history of NSW with a focus on coal seam gas (CSG) resources A report commissioned for the NSW Chief Scientist’s Office, May, 2013. Authors: Dr Craig O’Neill1, [email protected] Dr Cara Danis1, [email protected] 1Department of Earth and Planetary Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109. Contents A brief glossary of terms i 1. Introduction 01 2. Scope 02 3. A brief history of NSW Geology 04 4. Evolution of the Sydney­Gunnedah­Bowen Basin System 16 5. Sydney Basin 19 6. Gunnedah Basin 31 7. Bowen Basin 40 8. Surat Basin 51 9. Clarence­Moreton Basin 60 10. Gloucester Basin 70 11. Murray Basin 77 12. Oaklands Basin 84 13. NSW Hydrogeology 92 14. Seismicity and stress in NSW 108 15. Summary and Synthesis 113 ii A brief Glossary of Terms The following constitutes a brief, but by no means comprehensive, compilation of some of the terms used in this review that may not be clear to a non‐geologist reader. Many others are explained within the text. Tectono­thermal: The involvement of either (or both) tectonics (the large‐scale movement of the Earth’s crust and lithosphere), and geothermal activity (heating or cooling the crust). Orogenic: pertaining to an orogen, ie. a mountain belt. Associated with a collisional or mountain‐building event. Ma: Mega‐annum, or one million years. Conventionally associated with an age in geochronology (ie. million years before present). Epicratonic: “on the craton”, pertaining to being on a large, stable landmass (eg.
    [Show full text]
  • Palynological and Lithostratigraphi Features of The
    S: � ) Palynological and Lithostratigraphi . -t) 617 Features of the Razorhacl{ Beds� � Mount Morgan District� Queensland BY G. PLAYFORD and K. D. CORNELIUS DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY . Volume VI Number 3 PALYNOLOGICAL AND LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC FEATURES OF THE RAZORBACK BEDS, MOUNT MORGAN DISTRICT, QUEENSLAND Non-marine Razorback Beds of Lower Jurassic age can be recognized forming the Razarback Mountains immediately behind the Mount Morgan smelter stack. This conspicuous topographic expression stands in sharp contrast to the down­ faulted, negative topography exhibited by the Stanwell Coal Measures in the vicinity of Stanwell. Stanwell is located to the northwest, midway between the fiducial marks and the right edge of the photograph. Clearlyvisible are the Mount Morgan open cut, the dumps, and the tailings. (Photographed by Adastra Airways Pty. Ltd. on 21 September 1959. Reproduced by courtesy of Mount Morgan Limited.) Palynological and Lithostratigraphic Features of the Razorback Beds, Mount Morgan District, Queensland by G. PLAYFORD, B.Sc. (W.Aust.), Ph.D. (Cantab.) and K. D. CORNELIUS, M.S. (Ariz.) Price: Thirty Cents University of Queensland Papers Department of Geology Volume VI Number 3 UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND PRESS St. Lucia 5 April 1967 WHOLLY SET UP AND PRINTED IN AUSTRALIA BY WATSON FERGUSON AND COMPANY, BRISBANE, QUEENSLAND 1967 PALYNOLOGICAL AND LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC FE.ATURE.S OF THE. RAZORBACK BE.DS, MOUNT MORGAN DISTRICT, QUE.E.NSLAND ABsTRACT. Non-marine Mesozoic sediments, known as the Razorback Beds, unconformably overlie Palaeozoic ore-bearing rocks in the Mount Morgan district of east-central Queensland. The Razorback sequence consists largely of protoquartzite sandstones, which are extensively cross-stratified; intercalations of silty claystones and conglomerates are common in the basal portion.
    [Show full text]
  • Surat Underground Water Impact Report
    Underground Water Impact Report for the Surat Cumulative Management Area 18 July 2012 Prepared by: Coal Seam Gas Water Queensland Water Commission © State of Queensland (Queensland Water Commission) 2012 Surat Underground Water Impact Report Contents Tables......................................................................................................................................... iv Figures........................................................................................................................................ iv Appendices..................................................................................................................................v Abbreviations.............................................................................................................................. vi Overview ................................................................................................................................ ix 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Water Rights.........................................................................................................................................1 1.2 Cumulative Management......................................................................................................................1 1.3 Surat Underground Water Impact Report .............................................................................................1 1.4 Implementation
    [Show full text]
  • Early Cretaceous Macrofloras of Western Australia
    Records of the Westem Australian Museum 18: 19-65 (1996), Early Cretaceous macrofloras of Western Australia Stephen McLoughlin School of Botany, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia Abstract - Western Australian, Lower Cretaceous, macrofloras from the Broome Sandstone and Callawa Formation (Canning Basin), Nanutarra Formation and Birdrong Sandstone (Carnarvon Basin), Cronin Sandstone (Officer Basin), and Leederville and Bullsbrook Formations (Perth Basin) incorporate a range of lycophytes, ferns, pteridosperms, bennettitaleans, and conifers, The new monotypic genus Roebuckia is established for spatulate fern fronds (R, spatulata) of possible vittariacean alliance. Other newly established species include Phyllopteroides westralensis, Elatocladus ginginensis, and Carpolithes bullsbrookensis, Although the Western Australian fossil suites reveal some specific differences from other Australian late Mesozoic assemblages, several shared index taxa and the high proportion of bennettitaleans support correlation with the Victorian Neocomian Ptilophyllum-Pachypteris austropapillosa Zone (Zone B). Some Western Australian taxa are shared with Indian assemblages but fewer similarities exist with other Gondwanan Early Cretaceous floras, The representation of several hydrophilous fern, lycophyte, and pteridosperm groups together with growth indices from fossil woods implies a seasonal humid mesothermal climate for the Western Australian eratonic margin during the Neocomian-Barremian. Minor differences between the Western Australian
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Surat Basin Geological Model Surat Basin Stratigraphic Framework April 2012
    Appendix D Surat Basin geological model Surat Basin Stratigraphic Framework April 2012 Surat Basin Stratigraphic Framework April 2012 – Surat Basin Stratigraphic Framework April 2012 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 8 2.1. Area of Interest ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.2. Datasets .................................................................................................................................. 8 2.3. Geological Modelling ............................................................................................................ 10 3. Regional Structure ........................................................................................................................ 12 4. Geological Descriptions ................................................................................................................. 17 4.1. Base Jurassic Unconformity .................................................................................................. 17 4.2. Precipice Sandstone .............................................................................................................. 17 4.3. Evergreen Formation ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]