Functional Morphology of Stereospondyl Amphibian Skulls
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Functional Morphology of Stereospondyl Amphibian Skulls Samantha Clare Penrice Doctor of Philosophy School of Life Sciences College of Science July 2018 Functional morphology of stereospondyl amphibian skulls Stereospondyls were the most diverse clade of early tetrapods, spanning 190 million years, with over 250 species belonging to eight taxonomic groups. They had a range of morphotypes and have been found on every continent. Stereospondyl phylogeny is widely contested and repeatedly examined but despite these studies, we are still left with the question, why were they so successful and why did they die out? A group-wide analysis of functional morphology, informing us about their palaeobiology, was lacking for this group and was carried out in order to address the questions of their success and demise. Based on an original photograph collection, size independent skull morphometrics were used, in conjunction with analyses of the fossil record and comparative anatomy, to provide a synthesis of the functional morphology of stereospondyl amphibians. Stereospondyls originated in the Carboniferous and most taxonomic groups were extinct at the end of the Triassic. The early Triassic had exceptionally high numbers of short- lived genera, in habitats that were mostly arid but apparently experienced occasional monsoon rains. Genera turnover slowed and diversity was stable in the Middle Triassic, then declined with a series of extinctions of the Late Triassic. Stereospondyls showed the pattern of ‘disaster’ taxa: rapidly diversifying following a mass extinction, spreading to a global distribution, although this high diversity was relatively short-lived. Geometric morphometrics on characteristics of the skull and palate was carried out to assess general skull morphology and identified the orbital position and skull outline to be the largest sources of skull variation. Comparing anatomy of stereospondyls with extant species revealed that the differences in head shape and orbit positions between stereospondyls allows inference of a range of feeding behaviours, ranging from rapid head swipes, to crushing invertebrates with wide palatal bones, and crocodilian-type ambushing. The range of feeding modalities meant stereospondyl species were able to coexist with minimal competition. The success was, however, short lived, as highly specialised shapes in the middle and Late Triassic probably meant that stereospondyls were not able to adapt to a more generalised lifestyle when the end Triassic extinction eliminated ecosystems. i Contents Chapter 1: General Introduction........................................................................................ 1 1.1 Early tetrapods and the stereospondyls ................................................................... 1 1.2 Perceptions of stereospondyls in the literature ....................................................... 3 1.3 Phylogeny ................................................................................................................ 4 1.5 Aims and objectives of this thesis ......................................................................... 11 Chapter 2: General methods ............................................................................................ 12 2.1 Overview ............................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Identifying stereospondyls in the literature ........................................................... 12 2.3 Anatomy ................................................................................................................ 13 2.4 Taxonomic affinities ............................................................................................. 17 2.5 Geological time ..................................................................................................... 18 2.6 Image database ...................................................................................................... 18 Chapter 3: Distribution of stereospondyls in the fossil record ........................................ 21 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 21 3.1.1 Overview ........................................................................................................ 21 3.1.2 Dating formations........................................................................................... 22 3.1.3 The ancient world ........................................................................................... 23 3.1.4 Importance of distribution in the fossil record ............................................... 27 3.2 Methods ................................................................................................................. 30 3.2.1 Overview ........................................................................................................ 30 3.2.2 Data ................................................................................................................ 31 3.2.3 Fossil record correlations ............................................................................... 32 3.2.4 Origination, extinction and persistence through time .................................... 33 3.3 Results ................................................................................................................... 34 3.3.1 Distribution in the fossil record ..................................................................... 34 3.3.2 Originations, extinctions and persistence ....................................................... 42 3.3.4 Taxonomic distribution of stereospondyls ..................................................... 47 ii 3.4. Discussion ............................................................................................................ 49 3.4.1 Distribution in the fossil record ..................................................................... 49 3.4.2 Taxonomic distribution .................................................................................. 55 3.4.3 Unusual observations in geological time ....................................................... 56 3.4.4 Stereospondyl finds that are not attributable to species ................................. 57 3.4.5 Proxies ............................................................................................................ 58 3.4.6 Summary ........................................................................................................ 58 Chapter 4: Geometric Morphometrics of Stereospondyl Skull Features ........................ 60 4.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 60 4.1.1 Overview ........................................................................................................ 60 4.1.2 Geometric morphometrics in palaeontology .................................................. 61 4.1.3 Geometric morphometric studies of stereospondyls ...................................... 63 4.2 Methods ................................................................................................................. 67 4.2.1 Taxa selection................................................................................................. 67 4.2.2 Recording of landmarks ................................................................................. 67 4.2.3 Analysis .......................................................................................................... 68 4.3 Results ................................................................................................................... 75 4.3.1 Skull roof described by discreet landmarks ................................................... 75 4.3.2 Palate described by discreet landmarks ......................................................... 78 4.3.3 Skull outlines using semilandmarks ............................................................... 83 4.3.4 Orbit shape using semilandmarks .................................................................. 87 4.3.5 Naris shape using semilandmarks .................................................................. 90 4.3.6 Lacrimal shape using semilandmarks ............................................................ 93 4.3.7 Tabular shape using semilandmarks .............................................................. 96 4.3.8 Ectopterygoid shape using semilandmarks .................................................... 99 4.3.9 Palatine shape using semilandmarks ............................................................ 102 4.3.10 Subtemporal vacuity shape using semilandmarks...................................... 105 4.3.11 Mantel tests ................................................................................................ 108 iii 4.3.12 Extant amphibians ...................................................................................... 108 4.4 Discussion ........................................................................................................... 116 4.4.1 General observations .................................................................................... 116 4.4.2 Extant amphibian skull shapes ..................................................................... 122 4.4.3 Functional implications of shape differences ............................................... 123 Chapter 5: Consensus shapes of stereospondyl skulls .................................................. 129 5.1 Overview